OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS
Scored using Graphics cards Methodology v1.0
Graphics cards Methodology v1.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontum Graphics cards Methodology v1.0: technical specifications plus authentic consumer ratings, with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Graphics cards Methodology v1.0

INNO3D GeForce RTX 4070 Twin X2 OC Review | 118 Data compared

Avg. price:~£560VRAM:12 GBMemory bus width:192 bitThermal Design Power (TDP):200 W

INNO3D GeForce RTX 4070 Twin X2 OC Review: Compare 118 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Graphics cards category and whether it is worth buying.

INNO3D GeForce RTX 4070 Twin X2 OC
7.4/10

Overall score

Score
7.4/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the graphics card's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best graphics cards on the market.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 55% of models
Score components

90%

7.3

Technical score

10%

7.7

User score

â–²Better than 55% of graphics cards
7.4

Value for money

Value for money
7.4/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the graphics card's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a graphics card that offers a strong balance of performance, features, and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 57% of models
Score components

70%

7.4

Overall score

30%

7.6

Price

â–²Better than 57%
7.3

Technical score

Technical score
7.3/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Graphics cards category across these key areas: Performance, Memory, Platform & Features, Connectivity & Media, Power & Cooling, Design.
When it matters
When you want to compare graphics cards based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 55% of models
Score components

44%

6.8

Performance

24%

6.2

Memory

12%

7.9

Power & Cooling

11%

9.8

Platform & Features

5%

8.9

Design

4%

9.6

Connectivity & Media

â–²Better than 55%
7.7

User score

User score
7.7/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the graphics card.
When it matters
When you want to understand how a graphics card performs in real use and how reliable it is in terms of performance, temperatures, noise, stability, and long-term ownership.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 88% of models
Score components

70%

10

User ratings

30%

2.4

Number of reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
â–¼Worse than 88%
  • inno3d-geforce-rtx-4070-twin-x2-oc
  • inno3d-geforce-rtx-4070-twin-x2-oc
  • inno3d-geforce-rtx-4070-twin-x2-oc
inno3d-geforce-rtx-4070-twin-x2-oc
inno3d-geforce-rtx-4070-twin-x2-oc
inno3d-geforce-rtx-4070-twin-x2-oc
Best prices
*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
Best rankings
Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Loading category ranking...

Graphics cards model ranking

Ranked #534 of 2,195 models in Graphics cards (Overall score)

Technical Specifications of graphics card INNO3D GeForce RTX 4070 Twin X2 OC

Technical score
Technical score
7.3/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Graphics cards category across these key areas: Performance, Memory, Platform & Features, Connectivity & Media, Power & Cooling, Design.
When it matters
When you want to compare graphics cards based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 55% of models
Score components:

44%

6.8

Performance

24%

6.2

Memory

12%

7.9

Power & Cooling

11%

9.8

Platform & Features

5%

8.9

Design

4%

9.6

Connectivity & Media

7.3
User score
User score
7.7/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the graphics card.
When it matters
When you want to understand how a graphics card performs in real use and how reliable it is in terms of performance, temperatures, noise, stability, and long-term ownership.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 88% of models
Score components

70%

10

User ratings

30%

2.4

Number of reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
7.7
Popularity
Popularity
2.4/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the graphics card.
When it matters
When you prefer a graphics card that has already been chosen and reviewed by many other users.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 56% of models
Popularity:
INNO3D GeForce RTX 4070 Twin X2 OC has a popularity score of 2.4 points, which is lower than that of 54.7% of products in this category.
2.4
Value for money
Value for money
7.4/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the graphics card's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a graphics card that offers a strong balance of performance, features, and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 57% of models
Score components:

70%

7.4

Overall score

30%

7.6

Price

7.4
3DMark Time Spy benchmark score
17,186 points
Market range: <4k points – >34k points
This graphics card scores 17,186 points in 3DMark Time Spy, which is higher than 57.4% of graphics cards.
3DMark Port Royal score
11,156 points
Market range: <0 points – >25k points
This graphics card scores 11,156 points in 3DMark Port Royal, which is higher than 58.5% of graphics cards and equal to 0.1% of graphics cards.
PassMark (G3D) result
28,169 points
Market range: <7.7k points – >36k points
This graphics card scores 28,169 points in PassMark G3D, which is higher than 66.1% of graphics cards.
PassMark (DirectCompute) result
28,995 points
Market range: <3.1k points – >26.3k points
This graphics card scores 28,995 points in PassMark DirectCompute, which is higher than 93.2% of graphics cards and equal to 2.2% of graphics cards.
Floating-point performance
29.5 TFLOPS
Market range: <4.38 TFLOPS – >57.42 TFLOPS
This graphics card delivers 29.5 TFLOPS floating-point performance, which is higher than that of 57.5% of graphics cards and equal to that of 0.2% of graphics cards.
Show more
VRAM
12 GB
Market range: <4 GB – >24 GB
This graphics card has 12 GB of VRAM, which is more than 45.5% of graphics cards and equal to 16% of graphics cards.
Memory type
GDDR6X
GDDR version
GDDR6X
This graphics card uses GDDR6X memory, which is newer than on 56.7% of graphics cards and equal to 22.7% of graphics cards.
Memory bus width
192 bit
Market range: <64 bit – >384 bit
This graphics card uses a 192 bit memory bus, which is narrower than that of 50.3% of graphics cards and equal to that of 18.8% of graphics cards.
Maximum memory bandwidth
504 GB/s
Market range: <168 GB/s – >960 GB/s
This graphics card reaches 504 GB/s memory bandwidth, which is higher than that of 53.8% of graphics cards and equal to that of 2.1% of graphics cards.
Show more
PCI Express (PCIe) version
4
This graphics card supports PCIe 4, which is newer than on 22.3% of graphics cards and equal to 52.1% of graphics cards.
PCIe lanes
x16
This graphics card uses x16 PCIe lanes, which is more than 23.4% of graphics cards and equal to 76.6% of graphics cards.
DirectX version
12 Ultimate
This graphics card supports DirectX 12 Ultimate, which is more advanced than on 22.6% of graphics cards and equal to 77.4% of graphics cards.
Vulkan version
1.4
This graphics card supports Vulkan 1.4, which is more advanced than on 20.7% of graphics cards and equal to 79.3% of graphics cards.
OpenGL version
4.6
This graphics card supports OpenGL 4.6, which is more advanced than on 1.9% of graphics cards and equal to 98.1% of graphics cards.
Show more
Max displays supported
4
Market range: <4 – >4
This graphics card supports up to 4 displays, which is more than 8.3% of graphics cards and equal to 88.9% of graphics cards.
Max digital resolution
7680x4320
This graphics card supports a maximum digital resolution of 7680x4320, which is higher than that of 9% of graphics cards and equal to that of 91% of graphics cards.
DisplayPort outputs
3
Market range: <1 – >3
This graphics card offers 3 DisplayPort outputs, which is more than 21% of graphics cards and equal to 76.8% of graphics cards.
DisplayPort version
1.4a
This graphics card supports DisplayPort 1.4a, which is more advanced than on 19.5% of graphics cards and equal to 47.1% of graphics cards.
DisplayPort link rates
32.4 Gbps
Market range: <5.4 Gbps – >80 Gbps
This graphics card supports DisplayPort link rates up to 32.4 Gbps, which is faster than on 57.6% of graphics cards and equal to 21.5% of graphics cards.
Show more
Thermal Design Power (TDP)
200 W
Market range: <60 W – >360 W
This graphics card has a TDP of 200 W, which is lower than that of 51.4% of graphics cards and equal to that of 3.9% of graphics cards.
Power consumption while under peak load
200 W
Market range: <100 W – >400 W
This graphics card draws 200 W under peak load, which is lower than 54% of graphics cards and equal to 3.6% of graphics cards.
Recommended PSU wattage
650 W
Market range: <450 W – >850 W
This graphics card recommends a 650 W PSU, which is lower than that of 40.3% of graphics cards and equal to that of 13.9% of graphics cards.
Board power limit
200 W
Market range: <100 W – >400 W
This graphics card has a board power limit of 200 W, which is lower than that of 55.9% of graphics cards and equal to that of 2.5% of graphics cards.
PCIe power spec
200 W
Show more
Size
250x 118x 42 mm
This graphics card measures 250x118x 42 mm, which is more compact than 82.3% of graphics cards and equal in size to 1.2% of graphics cards.
Length
250 mm
Market range: <200 mm – >350 mm
This graphics card is 250 mm long, which is shorter than 68.1% of graphics cards and equal in length to 1.5% of graphics cards.
Height
118 mm
Market range: <109 mm – >146 mm
This graphics card is 118 mm tall, which is shorter than 66% of graphics cards and equal in height to 1.7% of graphics cards.
Slot width
2 slot/s
Market range: <2 slot/s – >3.25 slot/s
This graphics card occupies 2 slot/s, which is slimmer than 53.4% of graphics cards and equal in width to 42.5% of graphics cards.
Weight
850 g
Market range: <500 g – >2k g
This graphics card weighs 850 g, which is lighter than 67.4% of graphics cards and equal in weight to 0.2% of graphics cards.
Show more

INNO3D GeForce RTX 4070 Twin X2 OC vs the average graphics card

246810TotalPerformanceMemoryPlatform & FeaturesConnectivity & MediaPower & CoolingDesign
  • 0.5 slot/s slimmer design
    This graphics card occupies fewer slots than the average graphics card (2 slot/s vs 2.5 slot/s). The average graphics card occupies 2.5 slot/s.
    2 slot/s vs 2.5 slot/s
  • 10.5% faster memory speed
    This graphics card has a higher effective memory speed than the average graphics card (21000 MHz vs 19000 MHz). The average graphics card reaches an effective memory speed of 19000 MHz.
    21,000 MHz vs 19,000 MHz
  • More compact card size
    This graphics card is more compact than the average graphics card (250x118 x 42 mm vs 285x127 x 52 mm). The average graphics card has a size of 285x127 x 52 mm.
    250x118 x 42 mm vs 285x127 x 52 mm
  • 35 mm shorter card length
    This graphics card is shorter than the average graphics card (250 mm vs 285 mm). The average graphics card has a length of 285 mm.
    250 mm vs 285 mm
  • 12.5% higher memory bandwidth
    This graphics card has a higher memory bandwidth than the average graphics card (504 GB/s vs 448 GB/s). The average graphics card has a memory bandwidth of 448 GB/s.
    504 GB/s vs 448 GB/s
  • Newer HDMI version
    This graphics card supports a newer HDMI version than the average graphics card (2.1a vs 2.1).
    2.1a vs 2.1
  • 2.4x higher compute score
    This graphics card has a higher compute score than the average graphics card (28995 points vs 12074 points). The average graphics card has a compute score of 12074 points.
    28,995 points vs 12,074 points
  • 50% larger L2 cache
    This graphics card has more L2 cache than the average graphics card (36 MB vs 24 MB). The average graphics card has 24 MB L2 cache.
    36 MB vs 24 MB
  • 2.4x higher compute score
    This graphics card has a higher compute score than the average graphics card (28995 points vs 12074 points). The average graphics card has a compute score of 12074 points.
    28,995 points vs 12,074 points
  • 20.9% higher texture rate
    This graphics card has a higher texture rate than the average graphics card (460.9 GTexel/s vs 381.2 GTexel/s). The average graphics card has a texture rate of 381.2 GTexel/s.
    460.9 GTexel/s vs 381.2 GTexel/s
  • 24.3% higher PassMark score
    This graphics card has a higher PassMark score than the average graphics card (28169 points vs 22653 points). The average graphics card has a PassMark score of 22653 points.
    28,169 points vs 22,653 points
  • 40 more AI cores
    This graphics card has more AI cores than the average graphics card (184 vs 144). The average graphics card has 144 AI cores.
    184 vs 144
  • 29.2% higher FP32 performance
    This graphics card has a higher FP32 performance than the average graphics card (29.2 TFLOPS vs 22.57 TFLOPS). The average graphics card has FP32 performance of 22.57 TFLOPS.
    29.15 TFLOPS vs 22.57 TFLOPS
  • 6 more compute units
    This graphics card has more compute units than the average graphics card (46 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 compute units.
    46 vs 40
  • 10.5% faster memory speed
    This graphics card has a higher effective memory speed than the average graphics card (21000 MHz vs 19000 MHz). The average graphics card reaches an effective memory speed of 19000 MHz.
    21,000 MHz vs 19,000 MHz
  • 12.5% higher memory bandwidth
    This graphics card has a higher memory bandwidth than the average graphics card (504 GB/s vs 448 GB/s). The average graphics card has a memory bandwidth of 448 GB/s.
    504 GB/s vs 448 GB/s
  • 50% larger L2 cache
    This graphics card has more L2 cache than the average graphics card (36 MB vs 24 MB). The average graphics card has 24 MB L2 cache.
    36 MB vs 24 MB
  • Newer HDMI version
    This graphics card supports a newer HDMI version than the average graphics card (2.1a vs 2.1).
    2.1a vs 2.1
  • 0.5 slot/s slimmer design
    This graphics card occupies fewer slots than the average graphics card (2 slot/s vs 2.5 slot/s). The average graphics card occupies 2.5 slot/s.
    2 slot/s vs 2.5 slot/s
  • More compact card size
    This graphics card is more compact than the average graphics card (250x118 x 42 mm vs 285x127 x 52 mm). The average graphics card has a size of 285x127 x 52 mm.
    250x118 x 42 mm vs 285x127 x 52 mm
  • 35 mm shorter card length
    This graphics card is shorter than the average graphics card (250 mm vs 285 mm). The average graphics card has a length of 285 mm.
    250 mm vs 285 mm
  • 7 mm lower card height
    This graphics card is shorter than the average graphics card (118 mm vs 125 mm). The average graphics card has a height of 125 mm.
    118 mm vs 125 mm
  • 64 bit narrower memory bus
    This graphics card has a narrower memory bus than the average graphics card (192 bit vs 256 bit). The average graphics card has a memory bus width of 256 bit.
    192 bit vs 256 bit
  • 1 fewer fans
    This graphics card has fewer fans than the average graphics card (2 vs 3).
    2 vs 3
  • No dual BIOS
    This graphics card does not include dual BIOS, the average graphics card does.
  • No RGB lighting
    This graphics card does not include RGB lighting, the average graphics card does.
  • 25% slower VRAM clock
    This graphics card has a lower VRAM clock than the average graphics card (1313 MHz vs 1750 MHz). The average graphics card runs its VRAM at 1750 MHz.
    1,313 MHz vs 1,750 MHz
  • 2 fewer monitors per output type
    This graphics card supports fewer monitors per output type than the average graphics card (1 vs 3). The average graphics card supports 3 monitors per output type.
    1 vs 3
  • Older shader model
    This graphics card supports an older shader model than the average graphics card (6.7 vs 6.8).
    6.7 vs 6.8
  • 3.5% lower user score
    User score
    7.7/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the graphics card.
    When it matters
    When you want to understand how a graphics card performs in real use and how reliable it is in terms of performance, temperatures, noise, stability, and long-term ownership.
    Score distribution
    ▼▼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    INNO3D GeForce RTX 4070 Twin X2 OC
    the average graphics card
    INNO3D GeForce RTX 4070 Twin X2 OC has a lower user score than the average graphics card (7.73 vs 8.000).
    7.73 vs 8
  • 3.5% lower user score
    User score
    7.7/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the graphics card.
    When it matters
    When you want to understand how a graphics card performs in real use and how reliable it is in terms of performance, temperatures, noise, stability, and long-term ownership.
    Score distribution
    ▼▼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    INNO3D GeForce RTX 4070 Twin X2 OC
    the average graphics card
    INNO3D GeForce RTX 4070 Twin X2 OC has a lower user score than the average graphics card (7.73 vs 8.000).
    7.73 vs 8
  • 64 bit narrower memory bus
    This graphics card has a narrower memory bus than the average graphics card (192 bit vs 256 bit). The average graphics card has a memory bus width of 256 bit.
    192 bit vs 256 bit
  • 25% slower VRAM clock
    This graphics card has a lower VRAM clock than the average graphics card (1313 MHz vs 1750 MHz). The average graphics card runs its VRAM at 1750 MHz.
    1,313 MHz vs 1,750 MHz
  • Older shader model
    This graphics card supports an older shader model than the average graphics card (6.7 vs 6.8).
    6.7 vs 6.8
  • 2 fewer monitors per output type
    This graphics card supports fewer monitors per output type than the average graphics card (1 vs 3). The average graphics card supports 3 monitors per output type.
    1 vs 3
  • Older NVDEC generation
    This graphics card has a lower NVDEC generation than the average graphics card (5 vs 6). The average graphics card offers NVDEC generation 6.
    5 vs 6
  • 1 fewer fans
    This graphics card has fewer fans than the average graphics card (2 vs 3).
    2 vs 3
  • No dual BIOS
    This graphics card does not include dual BIOS, the average graphics card does.
  • 5 °C lower thermal ceiling
    This graphics card has a lower thermal ceiling than the average graphics card (100 °C vs 95 °C). The average graphics card has a thermal ceiling of 95 °C.
    100 °C vs 95 °C
  • No RGB lighting
    This graphics card does not include RGB lighting, the average graphics card does.

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

G
gadgetpilipinas.net
16/10/2023
Summary of the review
Inno3D RTX 4070 Twin X2 OC White Stealth Graphics Card Review Would you like help looking for performance benchmarks, pricing, or where to buy this sp...
E
eteknix.com
14/04/2023
Summary of the review
Nvidia RTX 4070 Graphics Card Review - Page 3
T
tweaktown.com
26/10/2023
Summary of the review
INNO3D GeForce RTX 4070 TWIN X2 OC White Stealth Review
C
cowcotland.com
13/04/2023
Summary of the review
Test INNO3D GEFORCE RTX 4070 TWIN X2 OC : Consommation et température
(Translated)Show original

Third-party reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
Reviews last updated: June 2026 · How we calculate this

What we like about INNO3D GeForce RTX 4070 Twin X2 OC

  • Compact two-slot design ideal for small form factor (SFF) cases
  • Excellent power efficiency with low power consumption for its performance tier
  • Runs cool and quiet even under heavy load
  • Includes a metal backplate for improved durability and heat dissipation
  • Great price-to-performance ratio compared to triple-fan models
  • Clean and neutral aesthetic without excessive RGB lighting

What we don't like about INNO3D GeForce RTX 4070 Twin X2 OC

  • Lacks flashy RGB lighting or a 'gamer' aesthetic which some users may miss
  • Limited overclocking headroom and no dual-BIOS feature
  • Fans are audible at higher speeds, though generally quiet at stock settings
  • Two-fan design may be perceived as 'bland' compared to larger, premium cards
  • Shorter warranty period (2 years) compared to some competitors

Verdict

The Inno3D GeForce RTX 4070 Twin X2 OC is a compact, dual-slot graphics card built on the Ada Lovelace architecture, featuring 5,888 CUDA cores and a factory-overclocked boost clock of 2,505 MHz. It is equipped with 12GB of GDDR6X memory on a 192-bit bus, delivering a bandwidth of 504 GB/s while maintaining a highly efficient 200W TDP. Key advantages include its small form factor, making it ideal for ITX builds, alongside support for DLSS 3 frame generation and quiet, effective cooling via dual 88mm scythe fans. Potential drawbacks include a lack of RGB lighting and a restricted power limit that prevents significant further overclocking.

Compare INNO3D GeForce RTX 4070 Twin X2 OC with other products in the Graphics cards category

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of INNO3D GeForce RTX 4070 Twin X2 OC and other products in the Graphics cards category

No results found