OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS
Scored using Graphics cards Methodology v1.0
Graphics cards Methodology v1.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontum Graphics cards Methodology v1.0: technical specifications plus authentic consumer ratings, with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Graphics cards Methodology v1.0

GIGABYTE Radeon RX 6750 XT Gaming OC Review | 118 Data compared

Avg. price:~£440VRAM:12 GBMemory bus width:192 bitThermal Design Power (TDP):250 W

GIGABYTE Radeon RX 6750 XT Gaming OC Review: Compare 118 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Graphics cards category and whether it is worth buying.

GIGABYTE Radeon RX 6750 XT Gaming OC
7.1/10

Overall score

Score
7.1/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the graphics card's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best graphics cards on the market.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 50% of models
Score components

90%

7.0

Technical score

10%

8.3

User score

â–²Better than 50% of graphics cards
7.4

Value for money

Value for money
7.4/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the graphics card's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a graphics card that offers a strong balance of performance, features, and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 57% of models
Score components

70%

7.1

Overall score

30%

8.2

Price

â–²Better than 57%
7.0

Technical score

Technical score
7.0/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Graphics cards category across these key areas: Performance, Memory, Platform & Features, Connectivity & Media, Power & Cooling, Design.
When it matters
When you want to compare graphics cards based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 50% of models
Score components

44%

6.2

Performance

24%

6.3

Memory

12%

8.4

Power & Cooling

11%

9.2

Platform & Features

5%

8.2

Design

4%

8.5

Connectivity & Media

â–²Better than 50%
8.3

User score

User score
8.3/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the graphics card.
When it matters
When you want to understand how a graphics card performs in real use and how reliable it is in terms of performance, temperatures, noise, stability, and long-term ownership.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 68% of models
Score components

70%

8.5

User ratings

30%

8.0

Number of reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
â–²Better than 68%
  • gigabyte-radeon-rx-6750-xt-gaming-oc
  • gigabyte-radeon-rx-6750-xt-gaming-oc
  • gigabyte-radeon-rx-6750-xt-gaming-oc
  • gigabyte-radeon-rx-6750-xt-gaming-oc
  • gigabyte-radeon-rx-6750-xt-gaming-oc
  • gigabyte-radeon-rx-6750-xt-gaming-oc
  • gigabyte-radeon-rx-6750-xt-gaming-oc
  • gigabyte-radeon-rx-6750-xt-gaming-oc
gigabyte-radeon-rx-6750-xt-gaming-oc
gigabyte-radeon-rx-6750-xt-gaming-oc
gigabyte-radeon-rx-6750-xt-gaming-oc
gigabyte-radeon-rx-6750-xt-gaming-oc
gigabyte-radeon-rx-6750-xt-gaming-oc
gigabyte-radeon-rx-6750-xt-gaming-oc
gigabyte-radeon-rx-6750-xt-gaming-oc
gigabyte-radeon-rx-6750-xt-gaming-oc
Best prices
*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
Best rankings
Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of graphics card GIGABYTE Radeon RX 6750 XT Gaming OC

Technical score
Technical score
7.0/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Graphics cards category across these key areas: Performance, Memory, Platform & Features, Connectivity & Media, Power & Cooling, Design.
When it matters
When you want to compare graphics cards based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 50% of models
Score components:

44%

6.2

Performance

24%

6.3

Memory

12%

8.4

Power & Cooling

11%

9.2

Platform & Features

5%

8.2

Design

4%

8.5

Connectivity & Media

7.0
User score
User score
8.3/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the graphics card.
When it matters
When you want to understand how a graphics card performs in real use and how reliable it is in terms of performance, temperatures, noise, stability, and long-term ownership.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 68% of models
Score components

70%

8.5

User ratings

30%

8.0

Number of reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
8.3
Popularity
Popularity
8.0/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the graphics card.
When it matters
When you prefer a graphics card that has already been chosen and reviewed by many other users.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 75% of models
Popularity:
GIGABYTE Radeon RX 6750 XT Gaming OC has a popularity score of 8 points, which is higher than that of 74.6% of products in this category.
8.0
Value for money
Value for money
7.4/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the graphics card's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a graphics card that offers a strong balance of performance, features, and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 57% of models
Score components:

70%

7.1

Overall score

30%

8.2

Price

7.4
3DMark Time Spy benchmark score
13,419 points
Market range: <4k points – >34k points
This graphics card scores 13,419 points in 3DMark Time Spy, which is lower than 55.6% of graphics cards and equal to 0.1% of graphics cards.
3DMark Port Royal score
5,698 points
Market range: <0 points – >25k points
This graphics card scores 5,698 points in 3DMark Port Royal, which is lower than 69.9% of graphics cards and equal to 0.2% of graphics cards.
PassMark (G3D) result
20,689 points
Market range: <7.7k points – >36k points
This graphics card scores 20,689 points in PassMark G3D, which is lower than 59.1% of graphics cards and equal to 0.1% of graphics cards.
PassMark (DirectCompute) result
10,380 points
Market range: <3.1k points – >26.3k points
This graphics card scores 10,380 points in PassMark DirectCompute, which is lower than 60% of graphics cards.
Floating-point performance
13.43 TFLOPS
Market range: <4.38 TFLOPS – >57.42 TFLOPS
This graphics card delivers 13.43 TFLOPS floating-point performance, which is lower than that of 66.9% of graphics cards and equal to that of 0.1% of graphics cards.
Show more
VRAM
12 GB
Market range: <4 GB – >24 GB
This graphics card has 12 GB of VRAM, which is more than 45.5% of graphics cards and equal to 16% of graphics cards.
Memory type
GDDR6
GDDR version
GDDR6
This graphics card uses GDDR6 memory, which is newer than on 15.9% of graphics cards and equal to 40.3% of graphics cards.
Memory bus width
192 bit
Market range: <64 bit – >384 bit
This graphics card uses a 192 bit memory bus, which is narrower than that of 50.3% of graphics cards and equal to that of 18.8% of graphics cards.
Maximum memory bandwidth
432 GB/s
Market range: <168 GB/s – >960 GB/s
This graphics card reaches 432 GB/s memory bandwidth, which is lower than that of 58.9% of graphics cards and equal to that of 1.7% of graphics cards.
Show more
PCI Express (PCIe) version
4
This graphics card supports PCIe 4, which is newer than on 22.3% of graphics cards and equal to 52.1% of graphics cards.
PCIe lanes
x16
This graphics card uses x16 PCIe lanes, which is more than 23.4% of graphics cards and equal to 76.6% of graphics cards.
DirectX version
12 Ultimate
This graphics card supports DirectX 12 Ultimate, which is more advanced than on 22.6% of graphics cards and equal to 77.4% of graphics cards.
Vulkan version
1.4
This graphics card supports Vulkan 1.4, which is more advanced than on 20.7% of graphics cards and equal to 79.3% of graphics cards.
OpenGL version
4.6
This graphics card supports OpenGL 4.6, which is more advanced than on 1.9% of graphics cards and equal to 98.1% of graphics cards.
Show more
Max displays supported
4
Market range: <4 – >4
This graphics card supports up to 4 displays, which is more than 8.3% of graphics cards and equal to 88.9% of graphics cards.
Max digital resolution
7680x4320
This graphics card supports a maximum digital resolution of 7680x4320, which is higher than that of 9% of graphics cards and equal to that of 91% of graphics cards.
DisplayPort outputs
2
Market range: <1 – >3
This graphics card offers 2 DisplayPort outputs, which is fewer than 79.1% of graphics cards and equal to 9.5% of graphics cards.
DisplayPort version
1.4a
This graphics card supports DisplayPort 1.4a, which is more advanced than on 19.5% of graphics cards and equal to 47.1% of graphics cards.
DisplayPort link rates
8.1 Gbps
Market range: <5.4 Gbps – >80 Gbps
This graphics card supports DisplayPort link rates up to 8.1 Gbps, which is slower than on 65% of graphics cards and equal to 22.7% of graphics cards.
Show more
Thermal Design Power (TDP)
250 W
Market range: <60 W – >360 W
This graphics card has a TDP of 250 W, which is higher than that of 58.3% of graphics cards and equal to that of 6.2% of graphics cards.
Power consumption while under peak load
250 W
Market range: <100 W – >400 W
This graphics card draws 250 W under peak load, which is higher than 56.8% of graphics cards and equal to 4.8% of graphics cards.
Recommended PSU wattage
650 W
Market range: <450 W – >850 W
This graphics card recommends a 650 W PSU, which is lower than that of 40.3% of graphics cards and equal to that of 13.9% of graphics cards.
Board power limit
250 W
Market range: <100 W – >400 W
This graphics card has a board power limit of 250 W, which is higher than that of 55.1% of graphics cards and equal to that of 4.4% of graphics cards.
PCIe power spec
250 W
Show more
Size
281x 115x 49 mm
Length
281 mm
Market range: <200 mm – >350 mm
This graphics card is 281 mm long, which is shorter than 51.4% of graphics cards and equal in length to 1% of graphics cards.
Height
115 mm
Market range: <109 mm – >146 mm
This graphics card is 115 mm tall, which is shorter than 72.4% of graphics cards and equal in height to 1.7% of graphics cards.
Slot width
2.5 slot/s
Market range: <2 slot/s – >3.25 slot/s
This graphics card occupies 2.5 slot/s, which is slimmer than 36.3% of graphics cards and equal in width to 14.7% of graphics cards.
Weight
990 g
Market range: <500 g – >2k g
This graphics card weighs 990 g, which is lighter than 56.2% of graphics cards and equal in weight to 0.3% of graphics cards.
Show more

GIGABYTE Radeon RX 6750 XT Gaming OC vs the average graphics card

246810TotalPerformanceMemoryPlatform & FeaturesConnectivity & MediaPower & CoolingDesign
  • 4.7% higher boost clock speed
    This graphics card has a higher boost GPU clock than the average graphics card (2623 MHz vs 2505 MHz). The average graphics card has a boost GPU clock of 2505 MHz.
    2,623 MHz vs 2,505 MHz
  • Supports ECC memory
    This graphics card supports ECC memory, the average graphics card does not.
  • 24x more Infinity Cache
    This graphics card has more Infinity Cache than the average graphics card (96 MB vs 4 MB). The average graphics card has 4 MB Infinity Cache.
    96 MB vs 4 MB
  • 28.6% faster VRAM clock
    This graphics card has a higher VRAM clock than the average graphics card (2250 MHz vs 1750 MHz). The average graphics card runs its VRAM at 1750 MHz.
    2,250 MHz vs 1,750 MHz
  • 12% higher base clock speed
    This graphics card has a higher base GPU clock than the average graphics card (2150 MHz vs 1920 MHz). The average graphics card has a base GPU clock of 1920 MHz.
    2,150 MHz vs 1,920 MHz
  • 10 mm lower card height
    This graphics card is shorter than the average graphics card (115 mm vs 125 mm). The average graphics card has a height of 125 mm.
    115 mm vs 125 mm
  • 4.1% higher user score
    User score
    8.3/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the graphics card.
    When it matters
    When you want to understand how a graphics card performs in real use and how reliable it is in terms of performance, temperatures, noise, stability, and long-term ownership.
    Score distribution
    â–¼
    â–¼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    GIGABYTE Radeon RX 6750 XT Gaming OC
    the average graphics card
    GIGABYTE Radeon RX 6750 XT Gaming OC has a higher user score than the average graphics card (8.33 vs 8.000).
    8.33 vs 8
  • 4.1% higher user score
    User score
    8.3/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the graphics card.
    When it matters
    When you want to understand how a graphics card performs in real use and how reliable it is in terms of performance, temperatures, noise, stability, and long-term ownership.
    Score distribution
    â–¼
    â–¼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    GIGABYTE Radeon RX 6750 XT Gaming OC
    the average graphics card
    GIGABYTE Radeon RX 6750 XT Gaming OC has a higher user score than the average graphics card (8.33 vs 8.000).
    8.33 vs 8
  • 4.7% higher boost clock speed
    This graphics card has a higher boost GPU clock than the average graphics card (2623 MHz vs 2505 MHz). The average graphics card has a boost GPU clock of 2505 MHz.
    2,623 MHz vs 2,505 MHz
  • 12% higher base clock speed
    This graphics card has a higher base GPU clock than the average graphics card (2150 MHz vs 1920 MHz). The average graphics card has a base GPU clock of 1920 MHz.
    2,150 MHz vs 1,920 MHz
  • Supports ECC memory
    This graphics card supports ECC memory, the average graphics card does not.
  • 24x more Infinity Cache
    This graphics card has more Infinity Cache than the average graphics card (96 MB vs 4 MB). The average graphics card has 4 MB Infinity Cache.
    96 MB vs 4 MB
  • 28.6% faster VRAM clock
    This graphics card has a higher VRAM clock than the average graphics card (2250 MHz vs 1750 MHz). The average graphics card runs its VRAM at 1750 MHz.
    2,250 MHz vs 1,750 MHz
  • 10 mm lower card height
    This graphics card is shorter than the average graphics card (115 mm vs 125 mm). The average graphics card has a height of 125 mm.
    115 mm vs 125 mm
  • No CUDA support
    This graphics card does not support CUDA, the average graphics card does.
  • 64 bit narrower memory bus
    This graphics card has a narrower memory bus than the average graphics card (192 bit vs 256 bit). The average graphics card has a memory bus width of 256 bit.
    192 bit vs 256 bit
  • No DLSS support
    This graphics card does not support DLSS, the average graphics card does.
  • No dual BIOS
    This graphics card does not include dual BIOS, the average graphics card does.
  • 40% larger process node
    This graphics card has a higher process node than the average graphics card (7 nm vs 5 nm). The average graphics card uses a process node of 5 nm.
    7 nm vs 5 nm
  • 104 fewer AI cores
    This graphics card has fewer AI cores than the average graphics card (40 vs 144). The average graphics card has 144 AI cores.
    40 vs 144
  • No AV1 encoding
    This graphics card does not support AV1 encoding, the average graphics card does.
    No vs yes
  • 1 fewer DisplayPort outputs
    This graphics card has fewer DisplayPort outputs than the average graphics card (2 vs 3). The average graphics card has 3 DisplayPort outputs.
    2 vs 3
  • No CUDA support
    This graphics card does not support CUDA, the average graphics card does.
  • 104 fewer AI cores
    This graphics card has fewer AI cores than the average graphics card (40 vs 144). The average graphics card has 144 AI cores.
    40 vs 144
  • 40.5% lower FP32 performance
    This graphics card has a lower FP32 performance than the average graphics card (13.4 TFLOPS vs 22.57 TFLOPS). The average graphics card has FP32 performance of 22.57 TFLOPS.
    13.43 TFLOPS vs 22.57 TFLOPS
  • 37.8% lower ray tracing score
    This graphics card has a lower ray tracing score than the average graphics card (5698 points vs 9166 points). The average graphics card has a ray tracing score of 9166 points.
    5,698 points vs 9,166 points
  • 24 fewer TMUs
    This graphics card has fewer TMUs than the average graphics card (160 vs 184). The average graphics card has 184 TMUs.
    160 vs 184
  • 64 bit narrower memory bus
    This graphics card has a narrower memory bus than the average graphics card (192 bit vs 256 bit). The average graphics card has a memory bus width of 256 bit.
    192 bit vs 256 bit
  • 87.5% smaller L2 cache
    This graphics card has fewer L2 cache than the average graphics card (3 MB vs 24 MB). The average graphics card has 24 MB L2 cache.
    3 MB vs 24 MB
  • 5.3% slower memory speed
    This graphics card has a lower effective memory speed than the average graphics card (18000 MHz vs 19000 MHz). The average graphics card reaches an effective memory speed of 19000 MHz.
    18,000 MHz vs 19,000 MHz
  • 3.6% lower memory bandwidth
    This graphics card has a lower memory bandwidth than the average graphics card (432 GB/s vs 448 GB/s). The average graphics card has a memory bandwidth of 448 GB/s.
    432 GB/s vs 448 GB/s
  • No DLSS support
    This graphics card does not support DLSS, the average graphics card does.
  • 40% larger process node
    This graphics card has a higher process node than the average graphics card (7 nm vs 5 nm). The average graphics card uses a process node of 5 nm.
    7 nm vs 5 nm
  • Older encoder generation
    This graphics card uses an older encoder generation than the average graphics card (3 vs 8). The average graphics card uses encoder generation 8.
    3 vs 8
  • 1 older
    This graphics card was released earlier than the average graphics card (2022 vs 2023).
    May 2022
    2,022 vs 2,023
  • Older shader model
    This graphics card supports an older shader model than the average graphics card (6.7 vs 6.8).
    6.7 vs 6.8
  • No AV1 encoding
    This graphics card does not support AV1 encoding, the average graphics card does.
    No vs yes
  • 1 fewer DisplayPort outputs
    This graphics card has fewer DisplayPort outputs than the average graphics card (2 vs 3). The average graphics card has 3 DisplayPort outputs.
    2 vs 3
  • Narrower decode codec support
    This graphics card supports narrower hardware decode codec support than the average graphics card (H.264/H.265/AV1/VP9 vs H.264/H.265/AV1/VP9/MPEG-2/VC-1).
    H.264/H.265/AV1/VP9 vs H.264/H.265/AV1/VP9/MPEG-2/VC-1
  • 2 fewer monitors per output type
    This graphics card supports fewer monitors per output type than the average graphics card (1 vs 3). The average graphics card supports 3 monitors per output type.
    1 vs 3
  • No dual BIOS
    This graphics card does not include dual BIOS, the average graphics card does.
  • 16.3% higher TDP
    This graphics card has a higher TDP than the average graphics card (250 W vs 215 W). The average graphics card has a TDP of 215 W.
    250 W vs 215 W
  • 15 °C lower thermal ceiling
    This graphics card has a lower thermal ceiling than the average graphics card (110 °C vs 95 °C). The average graphics card has a thermal ceiling of 95 °C.
    110 °C vs 95 °C
  • 11 °C higher idle temperature
    This graphics card has a higher idle temperature than the average graphics card (48 °C vs 37 °C). The average graphics card has an idle temperature of 37 °C.
    48 °C vs 37 °C

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

H
hardwareluxx.de
10/05/2022
Summary of the review
Lautstärke, Temperatur und Leistungsaufnahme - Seite 8 (Specific measurements for the Gigabyte model) For detailed in-depth analysis of this specific...
(Translated)Show original

Third-party reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
Reviews last updated: June 2026 · How we calculate this

What we like about GIGABYTE Radeon RX 6750 XT Gaming OC

  • Excellent 1440p gaming performance, often exceeding 60 FPS on high settings
  • Effective Windforce 3X cooling system that keeps temperatures stable under load
  • Includes 12GB of VRAM, providing better longevity than some competing mid-range cards
  • Generally quiet operation even during intensive gaming sessions
  • Solid build quality featuring a protective metal backplate
  • Good value for money compared to higher-end NVIDIA alternatives like the RTX 3070

What we don't like about GIGABYTE Radeon RX 6750 XT Gaming OC

  • Ray tracing performance is significantly weaker than NVIDIA's equivalent offerings
  • Higher power consumption (TDP) compared to the original RX 6700 XT for minor performance gains
  • Gigabyte's RGB Fusion software is frequently criticized by users for being buggy
  • Customer support from Gigabyte is noted by some community members as being difficult to deal with
  • Limited performance headroom for 4K gaming in modern AAA titles
  • Lack of widespread support for FSR compared to NVIDIA's more mature DLSS technology

Verdict

The Gigabyte Radeon RX 6750 XT Gaming OC is a factory-overclocked RDNA 2 graphics card featuring 12GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus with 18Gbps effective speeds and 432GB/s bandwidth. Built on the 7nm process with 2,560 stream processors and 40 ray accelerators, it features a boost clock up to 2623MHz and a game clock of 2533MHz, aimed squarely at high-refresh 1440p gaming. Its main characteristics include the Windforce 3X cooling system with alternate-spinning 80mm fans, a protective metal backplate, and RGB Fusion 2.0. Pros include excellent thermal performance, quiet operation under load, and a notable performance lead over its predecessor in memory-bandwidth-limited titles. However, cons include higher power consumption (250W TBP) compared to the RX 6700 XT, limited performance gains in non-optimized titles, and weaker ray tracing and upscaling maturity relative to its Nvidia competitors.

Compare GIGABYTE Radeon RX 6750 XT Gaming OC with other products in the Graphics cards category

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of GIGABYTE Radeon RX 6750 XT Gaming OC and other products in the Graphics cards category

No results found