Scored using Graphics cards Methodology v3.0
Graphics cards Methodology v3.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontum Graphics cards Methodology v3.0: the technical score from the specifications is the base, and independent expert and video reviews (up to ±0.5 points), owner opinions (up to ±0.3) and best-of lists (up to +0.3) move it up or down.
Explore Graphics cards Methodology v3.0

ASUS TUF GeForce RTX 3080 Gaming review: 117 specs compared

Avg. price:~£670VRAM:10 GBMemory bus width:320 bitThermal Design Power (TDP):320 W

ASUS TUF GeForce RTX 3080 Gaming Review: Compare 117 technical specifications and 27 expert and video reviews to see how this product ranks in the Graphics cards category and whether it is worth buying.

ASUS TUF GeForce RTX 3080 Gaming
7.8/10

Overall score

Score
7.8/ 10
✕
What it is
Our main score for this model, 1–10. It combines specs, expert reviews, best-of lists and owners.
How we count it
Parts: Technical score 40%, Reviews score 25%, List score 25%, Sentiment score 10%
Marks: Each part gets a mark out of 10. For reviews, lists and owners, a typical model in this category gets about 8 and the best one gets 10.
No data yet: A part with no data shows "?". It counts as the mark of a weaker model in this category (4 in 5 models with data score higher). This way, models with reviews, lists and owners usually come out ahead.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

40%

7.4

Technical score

25%

8.7

Reviews score

25%

?

List scoreNot enough data yet, so we use 7.5, the mark of a weaker model in this category

10%

7.4

Sentiment score

▲Better than 63% of graphics cards
7.5

Value for money

Value for money
7.5/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the graphics card's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a graphics card that offers a strong balance of performance, features, and price.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

7.8

Overall score

30%

7.0

Price

▲Better than 54%
7.4

Technical score

Technical score
7.4/ 10
✕
What it is
How good the specs are compared with the other models in this category, 1–10.
How we count it
Areas: We rate the specs in each area against the other models in this category.
Weighting: The areas that matter most to buyers count more. The shares are shown under Score components.
Share: The technical score is 40% of the overall score.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

44%

7.0

Performance

24%

7.0

Memory

12%

7.8

Power

11%

9.2

Features

5%

7.1

Design

4%

9.2

Connectivity

▲Better than 60%
8.7

Reviews score

Reviews score
8.7/ 10
✕
What it is
Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
How we count it
Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves. Big test sites count more, short reviews half as much as full tests. A video review counts half.
Score: The average grade is 80% of the review mark; the number of reviews is the other 20% (1 review = 5, the typical number in this category = 8, the most-reviewed model = 10).
Enough data: With few reviews, the average grade is pulled toward the typical grade of this category. No reviews yet: 7.6 for now.
Share: Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10

80%

8.6

Average grade

20%

9.2

Popularity

Grades by review (27)
17 reviews: 11 with a printed score, 6 estimated from the review. 10 video reviews, each counting half as much as a written test. Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
User ratings collected online are not part of this score.
★Better than 98%
?

List score

List score
7.5/ 10
✕
What it is
How often independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers put this model in their best-of lists for this category.
How we count it
Points: The model in the most lists of this category gets 10; the others get 8 to 10 in proportion. In no list yet: 7.5. Lists count 25% of the overall score.
Enough data: Every list counts, even a single one. With fewer than 5 best-of lists in the category, this part is left out.
Lists with this model (0)
Not in any best-of list yet, so this part counts as 7.5. Models in a list get 8 to 10.
Not in any best-of list yet
  • asus-tuf-geforce-rtx-3080-gaming
  • asus-tuf-geforce-rtx-3080-gaming
  • asus-tuf-geforce-rtx-3080-gaming
  • asus-tuf-geforce-rtx-3080-gaming
  • asus-tuf-geforce-rtx-3080-gaming
  • asus-tuf-geforce-rtx-3080-gaming
  • asus-tuf-geforce-rtx-3080-gaming
  • asus-tuf-geforce-rtx-3080-gaming
  • asus-tuf-geforce-rtx-3080-gaming
asus-tuf-geforce-rtx-3080-gaming
asus-tuf-geforce-rtx-3080-gaming
asus-tuf-geforce-rtx-3080-gaming
asus-tuf-geforce-rtx-3080-gaming
asus-tuf-geforce-rtx-3080-gaming
asus-tuf-geforce-rtx-3080-gaming
asus-tuf-geforce-rtx-3080-gaming
asus-tuf-geforce-rtx-3080-gaming
asus-tuf-geforce-rtx-3080-gaming
Where to buy
*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.

What reviewers say about the ASUS TUF GeForce RTX 3080 Gaming

Based on 17 · 11

Reviewers praise its cool temperatures, quiet running and solid build, but complain it is huge, heavy and power hungry.
Praised
Mixed views
Criticised
Pick a topic to see who said what

What owners say about the ASUS TUF GeForce RTX 3080 Gaming

Based on 238 owners sharing their experience in online comments

68%positive13%mixed19%negative

Owners praise strong, lasting gaming performance, while limited VRAM, high power use, and heat cause the most frustration.

What owners dislike

  • Several owners say the card runs very hot and heats up small rooms, with some models hitting over 100 C in the VRM or hotspot without new pads or paste.7
  • Owners say 10GB of VRAM runs out in newer games at 1440p and 4K, causing stutters or forcing lower texture settings.4

Points mentioned by at least 3 owners, most mentioned first.

Loading...
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of graphics card ASUS TUF GeForce RTX 3080 Gaming

Technical score
Technical score
7.4/ 10
✕
What it is
How good the specs are compared with the other models in this category, 1–10.
How we count it
Areas: We rate the specs in each area against the other models in this category.
Weighting: The areas that matter most to buyers count more. The shares are shown under Score components.
Share: The technical score is 40% of the overall score.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

44%

7.0

Performance

24%

7.0

Memory

12%

7.8

Power

11%

9.2

Features

5%

7.1

Design

4%

9.2

Connectivity

7.4
Reviews score
8.7
List score
?
Value for money
Value for money
7.5/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the graphics card's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a graphics card that offers a strong balance of performance, features, and price.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

70%

7.8

Overall score

30%

7.0

Price

7.5
3DMark Time Spy benchmark score
15,000 points
This graphics card scores 15,000 points in 3DMark Time Spy, which is higher than 51.4% of graphics cards and equal to 0.5% of graphics cards.
3DMark Port Royal score
11,449 points
This graphics card scores 11,449 points in 3DMark Port Royal, which is higher than 59.9% of graphics cards.
PassMark (G3D) result
25,063 points
This graphics card scores 25,063 points in PassMark G3D, which is higher than 57.9% of graphics cards and equal to 0.3% of graphics cards.
PassMark (DirectCompute) result
25,159 points
This graphics card scores 25,159 points in PassMark DirectCompute, which is higher than 87% of graphics cards and equal to 0.1% of graphics cards.
FP32 performance
29.77 TFLOPS
This graphics card delivers 29.77 TFLOPS FP32 performance, which is higher than that of 59.4% of graphics cards and equal to that of 0.4% of graphics cards.
Show more
What reviewers say
VRAM
10 GB
This graphics card has 10 GB of VRAM, which is less than 55.5% of graphics cards and equal to 1.3% of graphics cards.
Memory type
GDDR6X
This graphics card uses GDDR6X memory, which is newer than on 57.1% of graphics cards and equal to 22.4% of graphics cards.
Memory bus width
320 bit
This graphics card uses a 320 bit memory bus, which is wider than that of 86.2% of graphics cards and equal to that of 2% of graphics cards.
Maximum memory bandwidth
760 GB/s
This graphics card reaches 760 GB/s memory bandwidth, which is higher than that of 80.6% of graphics cards and equal to that of 0.8% of graphics cards.
Effective memory speed
19,000 MHz
This graphics card reaches an effective memory speed of 19,000 MHz, which is faster than that of 48.5% of graphics cards and equal to that of 3.2% of graphics cards.
Show more
PCI Express (PCIe) version
4
This graphics card supports PCIe 4, which is newer than on 22.5% of graphics cards and equal to 50.5% of graphics cards.
PCIe lanes
x16
This graphics card uses x16 PCIe lanes, which is more than 24.1% of graphics cards and equal to 75.9% of graphics cards.
DirectX version
12 Ultimate
This graphics card supports DirectX 12 Ultimate, which is more advanced than on 22.8% of graphics cards and equal to 77.2% of graphics cards.
Vulkan version
1.4
This graphics card supports Vulkan 1.4, which is more advanced than on 20.8% of graphics cards and equal to 79.2% of graphics cards.
OpenGL version
4.6
This graphics card supports OpenGL 4.6, which is more advanced than on 2% of graphics cards and equal to 98% of graphics cards.
Show more
Max displays supported
4
This graphics card supports up to 4 displays, which is more than 9% of graphics cards and equal to 88.2% of graphics cards.
Max digital resolution
7680x4320
This graphics card supports a maximum digital resolution of 7680x4320, which is higher than that of 9.2% of graphics cards and equal to that of 90.9% of graphics cards.
DisplayPort outputs
3
This graphics card offers 3 DisplayPort outputs, which is more than 21.7% of graphics cards and equal to 76% of graphics cards.
DisplayPort version
1.4a
This graphics card supports DisplayPort 1.4a, which is more advanced than on 19.3% of graphics cards and equal to 46.3% of graphics cards.
DisplayPort link rates
8.1 Gbps
This graphics card supports DisplayPort link rates up to 8.1 Gbps, which is slower than on 65.3% of graphics cards and equal to 22.5% of graphics cards.
Show more
Thermal Design Power (TDP)
320 W
This graphics card has a TDP of 320 W, which is higher than that of 79.8% of graphics cards and equal to that of 5.6% of graphics cards.
Power consumption while under peak load
344 W
This graphics card draws 344 W under peak load, which is higher than 84% of graphics cards.
Recommended PSU wattage
850 W
This graphics card recommends a 850 W PSU, which is higher than that of 83.6% of graphics cards and equal to that of 11.9% of graphics cards.
Board power limit
375 W
This graphics card has a board power limit of 375 W, which is higher than that of 88.6% of graphics cards and equal to that of 0.5% of graphics cards.
PCIe power spec
320 W
Show more
What reviewers say
Size
300x 126.7x 51.7 mm
Length
300 mm
This graphics card is 300 mm long, which is longer than 57.3% of graphics cards and equal in length to 2.9% of graphics cards.
Height
127 mm
This graphics card is 127 mm tall, which is taller than 54.2% of graphics cards and equal in height to 1.2% of graphics cards.
Slot width
2.7 slot/s
This graphics card occupies 2.7 slot/s, which is wider than 65.9% of graphics cards and equal in width to 2.2% of graphics cards.
Weight
1,398 g
This graphics card weighs 1,398 g, which is heavier than 70.1% of Graphics cards.
Show more
What reviewers say

ASUS TUF GeForce RTX 3080 Gaming vs the average graphics card

246810TotalPerformanceMemoryFeaturesConnectivityPowerDesign
  • 128 bit wider memory bus
    This graphics card has a wider memory bus than the average graphics card (320 bit vs 192 bit). The average graphics card has a memory bus width of 192 bit.
    320 bit vs 192 bit
  • 69.6% higher memory bandwidth
    This graphics card has a higher memory bandwidth than the average graphics card (760 GB/s vs 448 GB/s). The average graphics card has a memory bandwidth of 448 GB/s.
    760 GB/s vs 448 GB/s
  • 28 more compute units
    This graphics card has more compute units than the average graphics card (68 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 compute units.
    68 vs 40
  • 28 more ray tracing cores
    This graphics card has more ray tracing cores than the average graphics card (68 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 ray tracing cores.
    68 vs 40
  • 32 more ROPs
    This graphics card has more ROPs than the average graphics card (96 vs 64). The average graphics card has 64 ROPs.
    96 vs 64
  • 88 more TMUs
    This graphics card has more TMUs than the average graphics card (272 vs 184). The average graphics card has 184 TMUs.
    272 vs 184
  • Supports ECC memory
    This graphics card supports ECC memory, the average graphics card does not.
  • 128 more AI cores
    This graphics card has more AI cores than the average graphics card (272 vs 144). The average graphics card has 144 AI cores.
    272 vs 144
  • 20.8% higher review score
    Reviews score
    8.7/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
    How we count it
    Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves. Big test sites count more, short reviews half as much as full tests. A video review counts half.
    Score: The average grade is 80% of the review mark; the number of reviews is the other 20% (1 review = 5, the typical number in this category = 8, the most-reviewed model = 10).
    Enough data: With few reviews, the average grade is pulled toward the typical grade of this category. No reviews yet: 7.6 for now.
    Share: Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
    Score distribution
    ▼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10

    80%

    8.6

    Average grade

    20%

    9.2

    Popularity

    Grades by review (27)
    17 reviews: 11 with a printed score, 6 estimated from the review. 10 video reviews, each counting half as much as a written test. Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
    User ratings collected online are not part of this score.
    8.7 vs 7.2
  • 28 more compute units
    This graphics card has more compute units than the average graphics card (68 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 compute units.
    68 vs 40
  • 28 more ray tracing cores
    This graphics card has more ray tracing cores than the average graphics card (68 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 ray tracing cores.
    68 vs 40
  • 32 more ROPs
    This graphics card has more ROPs than the average graphics card (96 vs 64). The average graphics card has 64 ROPs.
    96 vs 64
  • 88 more TMUs
    This graphics card has more TMUs than the average graphics card (272 vs 184). The average graphics card has 184 TMUs.
    272 vs 184
  • 128 more AI cores
    This graphics card has more AI cores than the average graphics card (272 vs 144). The average graphics card has 144 AI cores.
    272 vs 144
  • 23% higher texture rate
    This graphics card has a higher texture rate than the average graphics card (465.1 GTexel/s vs 378 GTexel/s). The average graphics card has a texture rate of 378 GTexel/s.
    465.1 GTexel/s vs 378 GTexel/s
  • 31.7% higher FP32 performance
    This graphics card has a higher FP32 performance than the average graphics card (29.8 TFLOPS vs 22.6 TFLOPS). The average graphics card has FP32 performance of 22.6 TFLOPS.
    29.77 TFLOPS vs 22.6 TFLOPS
  • 2.08x higher compute score
    This graphics card has a higher compute score than the average graphics card (25,159 points vs 12,70.5 points). The average graphics card has a compute score of 12,070.5 points.
    25,159 points vs 12,070.5 points
  • 128 bit wider memory bus
    This graphics card has a wider memory bus than the average graphics card (320 bit vs 192 bit). The average graphics card has a memory bus width of 192 bit.
    320 bit vs 192 bit
  • 69.6% higher memory bandwidth
    This graphics card has a higher memory bandwidth than the average graphics card (760 GB/s vs 448 GB/s). The average graphics card has a memory bandwidth of 448 GB/s.
    760 GB/s vs 448 GB/s
  • Supports ECC memory
    This graphics card supports ECC memory, the average graphics card does not.
  • Supports LHR limiting
    This graphics card supports an LHR limiter, while the average graphics card does not. 7.5% of Graphics cards support one.
  • 31.7% lower boost clock speed
    This graphics card has a lower boost GPU clock than the average graphics card (1,710 MHz vs 2,505 MHz). The average graphics card has a boost GPU clock of 2,505 MHz.
    1,710 MHz vs 2,505 MHz
  • Less advanced frame generation
    This graphics card has less advanced frame generation than the average graphics card (no vs multi frame generation).
  • 60% larger process node
    This graphics card uses a larger manufacturing process than the average graphics card (8 nm vs 5 nm). The average graphics card uses a manufacturing process of 5 nm.
    8 nm vs 5 nm
  • 25% lower base clock speed
    This graphics card has a lower base GPU clock than the average graphics card (1,440 MHz vs 1920 MHz). The average graphics card has a base GPU clock of 1920 MHz.
    1,440 MHz vs 1,920 MHz
  • 48.8% higher TDP
    This graphics card has a higher TDP than the average graphics card (320 W vs 215 W). The average graphics card has a TDP of 215 W.
    320 W vs 215 W
  • No AV1 encoding
    This graphics card does not support AV1 encoding, the average graphics card does.
  • 30.8% higher PSU requirement
    This graphics card has a higher PSU requirement than the average graphics card (850 W vs 650 W). The average graphics card has a PSU requirement of 650 W.
    850 W vs 650 W
  • 32.1% slower VRAM clock
    This graphics card has a lower VRAM clock than the average graphics card (1,188 MHz vs 1,750 MHz). The average graphics card runs its VRAM at 1,750 MHz.
    1,188 MHz vs 1,750 MHz
  • 28.9% more expensive
    ASUS TUF GeForce RTX 3080 Gaming is more expensive than the average graphics card (£670 vs £520).
    £670 vs £520
  • 31.7% lower boost clock speed
    This graphics card has a lower boost GPU clock than the average graphics card (1,710 MHz vs 2,505 MHz). The average graphics card has a boost GPU clock of 2,505 MHz.
    1,710 MHz vs 2,505 MHz
  • 25% lower base clock speed
    This graphics card has a lower base GPU clock than the average graphics card (1,440 MHz vs 1920 MHz). The average graphics card has a base GPU clock of 1920 MHz.
    1,440 MHz vs 1,920 MHz
  • 3 years older
    This graphics card was released earlier than the average graphics card (2020 vs 2023).
    September 2020
    2020 vs 2023
  • 32.1% slower VRAM clock
    This graphics card has a lower VRAM clock than the average graphics card (1,188 MHz vs 1,750 MHz). The average graphics card runs its VRAM at 1,750 MHz.
    1,188 MHz vs 1,750 MHz
  • 2 GB less VRAM
    This graphics card has fewer VRAM than the average graphics card (10 GB vs 12 GB). The average graphics card has 12 GB VRAM.
    10 GB vs 12 GB
  • 79.2% smaller L2 cache
    This graphics card has fewer L2 cache than the average graphics card (5 MB vs 24 MB). The average graphics card has 24 MB L2 cache.
    5 MB vs 24 MB
  • Less advanced frame generation
    This graphics card has less advanced frame generation than the average graphics card (no vs multi frame generation).
  • 60% larger process node
    This graphics card uses a larger manufacturing process than the average graphics card (8 nm vs 5 nm). The average graphics card uses a manufacturing process of 5 nm.
    8 nm vs 5 nm
  • 2.14x larger GPU die
    This graphics card has a higher GPU die size than the average graphics card (628 mm² vs 294 mm²). The average graphics card has a GPU die size of 294 mm².
    628 mm² vs 294 mm²
  • No AV1 encoding
    This graphics card does not support AV1 encoding, the average graphics card does.
  • Older HDMI version
    This graphics card supports an older HDMI version than the average graphics card (2.1 vs 2.1a).
    2.1 vs 2.1a
  • More basic codec support
    This graphics card encodes more basic formats than the average graphics card (H.264/H.265/VP9 vs H.264/H.265/AV1/VP9).
    H.264/H.265/VP9 vs H.264/H.265/AV1/VP9
  • Older NVDEC generation
    This graphics card has a lower NVDEC generation than the average graphics card (5 vs 6). The average graphics card offers NVDEC generation 6.
    5 vs 6
  • 62.5% lower DisplayPort bandwidth
    This graphics card has a lower DisplayPort bandwidth than the average graphics card (8.1 Gbps vs 21.6 Gbps). The average graphics card has DisplayPort bandwidth of 21.6 Gbps.
    8.1 Gbps vs 21.6 Gbps
  • 48.8% higher TDP
    This graphics card has a higher TDP than the average graphics card (320 W vs 215 W). The average graphics card has a TDP of 215 W.
    320 W vs 215 W
  • 30.8% higher PSU requirement
    This graphics card has a higher PSU requirement than the average graphics card (850 W vs 650 W). The average graphics card has a PSU requirement of 650 W.
    850 W vs 650 W
  • 70.5% higher board power limit
    This graphics card has a higher board power limit than the average graphics card (375 W vs 220 W). The average graphics card has a board power limit of 220 W.
    375 W vs 220 W
  • 56.4% higher peak power draw
    This graphics card has a higher peak power draw than the average graphics card (344 W vs 220 W). The average graphics card has a peak power draw of 220 W.
    344 W vs 220 W
  • 6 °C higher idle temperature
    This graphics card has a higher idle temperature than the average graphics card (43 °C vs 37 °C). The average graphics card has an idle temperature of 37 °C.
    43 °C vs 37 °C
  • 17.8 mm longer card length
    This graphics card is longer than the average graphics card (300 mm vs 282.2 mm). The average graphics card has a length of 282.2 mm.
    300 mm vs 282.2 mm
  • 0.2 slot/s wider design
    This graphics card occupies more slots than the average graphics card (2.7 slot/s vs 2.5 slot/s). The average graphics card occupies 2.5 slot/s.
    2.7 slot/s vs 2.5 slot/s
  • 37.9% heavier
    This graphics card is heavier than the average graphics card (1,398 g vs 1,014 g). The average graphics card weighs 1,014 g.
    1,398 g vs 1,014 g

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

9.0
Gadget Pilipinas
≈ estimated
13/10/2020
Hands-on review · game benchmarks, thermals and power draw
Verdict
ASUS TUF GeForce RTX 3080 Gaming is one of the best-value custom 3080s: cool, strong and worth buying if you can find one.
9.0
Bitwit
≈ estimated
18/09/2020
Hands-on review · benchmarks, temperatures and noise
Verdict
ASUS TUF GeForce RTX 3080 Gaming is strongly recommended for cooling and temperatures, though its size and design trail the Founders Edition.
9.0
The Tech Tank
≈ estimated
17/09/2020
Hands-on review · 4K benchmarks, temperatures and ray tracing
Verdict
The ASUS TUF GeForce RTX 3080 Gaming is impressive in every way and likely one of the best RTX 3080 cards in its price class.
9.0
der8auer
≈ estimated
17/09/2020
Hands-on review · shunt mod and cooling tests
Verdict
ASUS TUF GeForce RTX 3080 Gaming has a great, quiet cooler, but its thermal pads are hard to restore after the cooler comes off.
9.0
PC Centric
≈ estimated
17/09/2020
Hands-on review · clock speeds, thermals and noise
Verdict
The ASUS TUF GeForce RTX 3080 Gaming has excellent cooling and overclocking, but it is not much better than the Founders Edition, so price decides.
9.0
forthenext
≈ estimated
11/03/2021
Unboxing · first impressions and undervolted daily use
Verdict
ASUS TUF GeForce RTX 3080 Gaming is a strong card for its generation, and it runs quietly once undervolted.
Not graded
Hands-on video, no verdict
Overview video
Brand video
Hands-on video, no verdict
Not graded

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

9.0
tomshardware.com
✓ explicit
18/09/2020
Benchmark test · Cooling and noise
Verdict
The ASUS TUF Gaming RTX 3080 OC matches the Founders Edition's speed while running over 10°C cooler and slightly quieter, but it takes up an extra slot.
9.5
kitguru.net
✓ explicit
30/09/2020
Benchmark test · Gaming and cooling
Verdict
The ASUS TUF RTX 3080 OC is a sturdy, well-finished card with dual BIOS, but at 340 watts it is one of the most power-hungry GPUs tested.
9.0
techspot.com
✓ explicit
20/09/2020
Benchmark test · Thermals and power
Verdict
The ASUS TUF Gaming RTX 3080 OC is quieter, cooler and up to 6% faster than the Founders Edition, and it uses standard 8-pin power connectors.
8.0
pcmag.com
✓ explicit
15/10/2020
Lab test · Cooling and overclocking
Verdict
The ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3080 OC runs cooler than the Founders Edition and hits 4K at 60fps but trails it by a few frames in some games.
8.8
techporn.ph
✓ explicit
22/10/2020
Hands-on test · Gaming and software
Verdict
The ASUS TUF RTX 3080 O10G is a big card topping 60fps at 4K, but in lighter games like CS:GO and DOTA 2 its GPU usage drops to 30-40%.
8.0
ign.com
✓ explicit
16/07/2021
Hands-on test · Cooling and speed
Verdict
The ASUS TUF Gaming RTX 3080 OC is cool, quiet and fast, but only 1–4% ahead of the Founders Edition in game tests.
9.0
hardwareluxx.de
≈ estimated
30/09/2020
Benchmark test · Power limits
Verdict
The ASUS TUF RTX 3080 OC is an almost perfect all-rounder for gamers, though its 340W power limit is higher than Nvidia's own card.
9.0
pcgameshardware.de
≈ estimated
15/03/2021
Lab test · Custom cooler design
Verdict
The ASUS TUF Gaming RTX 3080 O10G is a well-tuned, sturdy card that boosts to about 1,890MHz, but its high power draw and bulk are drawbacks.
10
lesnumeriques.com
✓ explicit
30/10/2020
Lab test · Cooling and noise
Verdict
The ASUS TUF Gaming RTX 3080 is a well-built, quiet card whose fans stay off at idle, suiting players who want a calm PC.
8.0
comptoir-hardware.com
≈ estimated
18/09/2020
Lab test · Noise and software
Verdict
The ASUS TUF Gaming RTX 3080 runs cool and quiet thanks to its solid power section, but its Armoury Crate software still only controls the logo lighting.
9.0
elchapuzasinformatico.com
≈ estimated
18/09/2020
Lab test · Temperatures and noise
Verdict
The ASUS TUF RTX 3080 OC runs much cooler than the Founders Edition, but its three-fan cooler is large and its overclock adds only about 3%.
9.0
profesionalreview.com
✓ explicit
18/09/2020
Unboxing · Design and cooling
Verdict
The ASUS TUF RTX 3080 O10G is a well-built card with a metal shroud and strong cooling, but its 2.7-slot size suits only roomy cases.
7.0
hwupgrade.it
≈ estimated
16/11/2020
Lab test · Cooling and temperature
Verdict
The ASUS TUF Gaming RTX 3080 OC is a balanced card that runs well cooler than rivals, though its frame-rate gains are small.
9.3
multiplayer.it
✓ explicit
17/10/2020
Hands-on test · Cooling and build
Verdict
The ASUS TUF Gaming RTX 3080 OC is a sturdy, cool, quiet card for 4K gaming, but at 1.4 kg and 51.7 mm thick it needs a roomy case.
9.2
thegamesmachine.it
✓ explicit
07/10/2020
Benchmark test · Synthetic results
Verdict
The ASUS TUF Gaming RTX 3080 OC is among the strongest RTX 3080 cards and a clear step up from older GPUs, though Serious Sam 4 would not launch.
9.0
techtesters.eu
≈ estimated
17/09/2020
Hands-on test · Cooling and design
Verdict
The ASUS TUF RTX 3080 OC is a sturdy, cool card for 1440p high-refresh and 4K gaming, but its size and weight are the main drawbacks.
9.0
techgaming.nl
✓ explicit
29/09/2020
Performance test · Ray tracing
Verdict
The ASUS TUF RTX 3080 OC is a cool, quiet card that keeps ray tracing above 60fps, but it is large and heavy.

Third-party reviews

What customers like about ASUS TUF GeForce RTX 3080 Gaming

  • Exceptional cooling performance, often running 10-15°C cooler than the Founders Edition
  • High build quality featuring an all-aluminum shroud and backplate
  • Extremely quiet operation, especially when using the 'Quiet Mode' BIOS switch
  • Includes an additional HDMI 2.1 port (two total) compared to the standard single port on most 3080s
  • Strong overclocking and undervolting headroom due to the robust heatsink
  • Dual BIOS switch allows for easy toggling between performance and lower noise profiles

What customers don't like about ASUS TUF GeForce RTX 3080 Gaming

  • Large physical footprint (2.7-slot design) that may not fit in smaller cases
  • Minimal RGB lighting compared to higher-end series like the ROG Strix
  • Reports of noticeable coil whine in some units under high load
  • Requires significant power, often triggering OCP on older or lower-tier power supplies
  • Potential for GPU sag due to its heavy weight, often requiring a support bracket

Verdict

The Asus TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3080 is a high-performance graphics card built on NVIDIA's Ampere architecture, featuring 8,704 CUDA cores and 10GB of high-speed GDDR6X VRAM on a 320-bit interface. It distinguishes itself with a robust 2.7-slot cooling design that includes triple Axial-tech fans with dual ball bearings and a dedicated VRAM heatsink for superior thermal management. Key pros include exceptional 4K gaming performance, dual BIOS support for switching between performance and quiet modes, and a durable all-metal shroud with military-grade capacitors. Main cons include its massive physical footprint that may not fit in smaller cases, high power requirements typically necessitating at least a 750W-850W PSU, and relatively minimalist RGB lighting compared to enthusiast-tier competitors.

Compare ASUS TUF GeForce RTX 3080 Gaming with other products in the Graphics cards category

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of ASUS TUF GeForce RTX 3080 Gaming and other products in the Graphics cards category

No results found