OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS
Scored using Graphics cards Methodology v3.0
Graphics cards Methodology v3.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontum Graphics cards Methodology v3.0: the technical score from the specifications is the base, and independent expert and video reviews (up to ±0.5 points), owner opinions (up to ±0.3) and best-of lists (up to +0.3) move it up or down.
Explore Graphics cards Methodology v3.0

ASUS TUF 3 Radeon RX 5600 XT Evo Gaming 6G OC review: 117 specs compared

Avg. price:~£260VRAM:6 GBMemory bus width:192 bitThermal Design Power (TDP):150 W

ASUS TUF 3 Radeon RX 5600 XT Evo Gaming 6G OC Review: Compare 117 technical specifications and 1 expert reviews to see how this product ranks in the Graphics cards category and whether it is worth buying.

ASUS TUF 3 Radeon RX 5600 XT Evo Gaming 6G OC
5.9/10

Overall score

Score
5.9/ 10
✕
What it is
Our main score for this model, 1–10. It combines specs, expert reviews, best-of lists and owners.
How we count it
Parts: Technical score 40%, Reviews score 25%, List score 25%, Sentiment score 10%
Marks: Each part gets a mark out of 10. For reviews, lists and owners, a typical model in this category gets about 8 and the best one gets 10.
No data yet: A part with no data shows "?". It counts as the mark of a weaker model in this category (4 in 5 models with data score higher). This way, models with reviews, lists and owners usually come out ahead.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 90% of models
Score components

40%

5.3

Technical score

25%

5.3

Reviews score

25%

?

List scoreNot enough data yet, so we use 7.5, the mark of a weaker model in this category

10%

5.3

Sentiment score

â–¼Worse than 90% of graphics cards
6.9

Value for money

Value for money
6.9/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the graphics card's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a graphics card that offers a strong balance of performance, features, and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 79% of models
Score components

70%

5.9

Overall score

30%

9.2

Price

â–¼Worse than 79%
5.3

Technical score

Technical score
5.3/ 10
✕
What it is
How good the specs are compared with the other models in this category, 1–10.
How we count it
Areas: We rate the specs in each area against the other models in this category.
Weighting: The areas that matter most to buyers count more. The shares are shown under Score components.
Share: The technical score is 40% of the overall score.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 79% of models
Score components

44%

3.8

Performance

24%

4.1

Memory

12%

9.4

Power

11%

8.0

Features

5%

7.0

Design

4%

8.6

Connectivity

â–¼Worse than 79%
5.3

Reviews score

Reviews score
5.3/ 10
✕
What it is
Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
How we count it
Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves. Big test sites count more, short reviews half as much as full tests. A video review counts half.
Score: The average grade is 80% of the review mark; the number of reviews is the other 20% (1 review = 5, the typical number in this category = 8, the most-reviewed model = 10).
Enough data: With few reviews, the average grade is pulled toward the typical grade of this category. No reviews yet: 7.6 for now.
Share: Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 87% of models

5.3

Mark 7.7 is below the typical mark 7.9 of this category, so it cannot lift the score above the technical score

80%

8.4

Average grade

20%

5.0

Popularity

Grades by review (1)
1 review, with a printed score. Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
User ratings collected online are not part of this score.
â–¼Worse than 87%
?

List score

List score
7.5/ 10
✕
What it is
How often independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers put this model in their best-of lists for this category.
How we count it
Points: The model in the most lists of this category gets 10; the others get 8 to 10 in proportion. In no list yet: 7.5. Lists count 25% of the overall score.
Enough data: Every list counts, even a single one. With fewer than 5 best-of lists in the category, this part is left out.
Lists with this model (0)
Not in any best-of list yet, so this part counts as 7.5. Models in a list get 8 to 10.
Not in any best-of list yet
  • asus-tuf-3-radeon-rx-5600-xt-evo-gaming-6g-oc
  • asus-tuf-3-radeon-rx-5600-xt-evo-gaming-6g-oc
  • asus-tuf-3-radeon-rx-5600-xt-evo-gaming-6g-oc
  • asus-tuf-3-radeon-rx-5600-xt-evo-gaming-6g-oc
  • asus-tuf-3-radeon-rx-5600-xt-evo-gaming-6g-oc
  • asus-tuf-3-radeon-rx-5600-xt-evo-gaming-6g-oc
asus-tuf-3-radeon-rx-5600-xt-evo-gaming-6g-oc
asus-tuf-3-radeon-rx-5600-xt-evo-gaming-6g-oc
asus-tuf-3-radeon-rx-5600-xt-evo-gaming-6g-oc
asus-tuf-3-radeon-rx-5600-xt-evo-gaming-6g-oc
asus-tuf-3-radeon-rx-5600-xt-evo-gaming-6g-oc
asus-tuf-3-radeon-rx-5600-xt-evo-gaming-6g-oc
Where to buy
    N/A~ £260
Best rankings
Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.

What owners say about the ASUS TUF 3 Radeon RX 5600 XT Evo Gaming 6G OC

Based on 96 owners sharing their experience in online comments

64%positive8%mixed28%negative

Owners value its strong gaming performance, though driver instability, crashes, and black screens remain the main frustration.

What owners dislike

  • Owners report random crashes to desktop and reboots during games or everyday use, and several returned the card after nothing fixed them.39
  • Owners report sudden black screens, lost signal at boot, and screens that stay blank until a restart, sometimes fixed by changing the driver or BIOS.32
  • Owners say newer AMD driver versions broke games or caused black screens, and rolling back to an older driver version fixed the problem for some.19
  • Owners report stuttering and frame-rate drops in some games, especially with certain settings, and say performance can trail competing cards.11
  • Owners say the Radeon Software interface freezes, fails to open, and resets overclock settings, making tuning frustrating.10
  • Owners say the PC stalls or fails to boot, or shows no display after sleep or restart, sometimes until the drivers are reinstalled.8
  • Owners report the card reaching 85 to 100 degrees Celsius under load, which caused shutdowns until the fan curve was raised manually.3
  • Owners say frame-rate limiting features conflict with each other and that some games or VR sessions do not play well with them.3
  • Owners say the card plays loud beeps every time a game starts, a signal tied to anti-lag or enhanced sync, and disabling those features did not stop it.3
  • Owners say some BIOS updates forced higher memory clocks or caused boot failures, and flashing back to the old BIOS fixed it for some.3

Points mentioned by at least 3 owners, most mentioned first.

Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of graphics card ASUS TUF 3 Radeon RX 5600 XT Evo Gaming 6G OC

Technical score
Technical score
5.3/ 10
✕
What it is
How good the specs are compared with the other models in this category, 1–10.
How we count it
Areas: We rate the specs in each area against the other models in this category.
Weighting: The areas that matter most to buyers count more. The shares are shown under Score components.
Share: The technical score is 40% of the overall score.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 79% of models
Score components:

44%

3.8

Performance

24%

4.1

Memory

12%

9.4

Power

11%

8.0

Features

5%

7.0

Design

4%

8.6

Connectivity

5.3
Reviews score
5.3
List score
?
Value for money
Value for money
6.9/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the graphics card's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a graphics card that offers a strong balance of performance, features, and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 79% of models
Score components:

70%

5.9

Overall score

30%

9.2

Price

6.9
3DMark Time Spy benchmark score
7,057 points
Market range: <4.1k points – >30.1k points
This graphics card scores 7,057 points in 3DMark Time Spy, which is lower than 80.5% of graphics cards.
3DMark Port Royal score
0 points
Market range: <0 points – >22.4k points
This graphics card scores 0 points in 3DMark Port Royal, which is lower than 83.1% of graphics cards and equal to 16.9% of graphics cards.
PassMark (G3D) result
15,822 points
Market range: <7.7k points – >36k points
This graphics card scores 15,822 points in PassMark G3D, which is lower than 73.7% of graphics cards.
PassMark (DirectCompute) result
6,219 points
Market range: <3.1k points – >26.3k points
This graphics card scores 6,219 points in PassMark DirectCompute, which is lower than 78.5% of graphics cards.
FP32 performance
8.06 TFLOPS
Market range: <3.94 TFLOPS – >56.3 TFLOPS
This graphics card delivers 8.06 TFLOPS FP32 performance, which is lower than that of 77.8% of graphics cards and equal to that of 0.1% of graphics cards.
Show more
VRAM
6 GB
Market range: <4 GB – >16 GB
This graphics card has 6 GB of VRAM, which is less than 82.5% of graphics cards and equal to 5.1% of graphics cards.
Memory type
GDDR6
This graphics card uses GDDR6 memory, which is newer than on 16.4% of graphics cards and equal to 40.3% of graphics cards.
Memory bus width
192 bit
Market range: <128 bit – >384 bit
This graphics card uses a 192 bit memory bus, which is wider than that of 31.9% of graphics cards and equal to that of 18.7% of graphics cards.
Maximum memory bandwidth
336 GB/s
Market range: <168 GB/s – >960 GB/s
This graphics card reaches 336 GB/s memory bandwidth, which is lower than that of 63.6% of graphics cards and equal to that of 2% of graphics cards.
Effective memory speed
14,000 MHz
Market range: <7k MHz – >28k MHz
This graphics card reaches an effective memory speed of 14,000 MHz, which is slower than that of 69.4% of graphics cards and equal to that of 11.1% of graphics cards.
Show more
PCI Express (PCIe) version
4
This graphics card supports PCIe 4, which is newer than on 22.5% of graphics cards and equal to 50.5% of graphics cards.
PCIe lanes
x16
This graphics card uses x16 PCIe lanes, which is more than 24.1% of graphics cards and equal to 75.9% of graphics cards.
DirectX version
12
This graphics card supports DirectX 12, which is older than on 81.8% of graphics cards and equal to 17% of graphics cards.
Vulkan version
1.3
This graphics card supports Vulkan 1.3, which is older than on 79.2% of graphics cards and equal to 15.6% of graphics cards.
OpenGL version
4.6
This graphics card supports OpenGL 4.6, which is more advanced than on 2% of graphics cards and equal to 98% of graphics cards.
Show more
Max displays supported
4
Market range: <4 – >4
This graphics card supports up to 4 displays, which is more than 9% of graphics cards and equal to 88.2% of graphics cards.
Max digital resolution
7680x4320
This graphics card supports a maximum digital resolution of 7680x4320, which is higher than that of 9.2% of graphics cards and equal to that of 90.9% of graphics cards.
DisplayPort outputs
3
Market range: <1 – >3
This graphics card offers 3 DisplayPort outputs, which is more than 21.7% of graphics cards and equal to 76% of graphics cards.
DisplayPort version
1.4
This graphics card supports DisplayPort 1.4, which is older than on 80.8% of graphics cards and equal to 13.1% of graphics cards.
DisplayPort link rates
32.4 Gbps
Market range: <5.4 Gbps – >80 Gbps
This graphics card supports DisplayPort link rates up to 32.4 Gbps, which is faster than on 56.6% of graphics cards and equal to 20.9% of graphics cards.
Show more
Thermal Design Power (TDP)
150 W
Market range: <86 W – >360 W
This graphics card has a TDP of 150 W, which is lower than that of 72.9% of graphics cards and equal to that of 2.8% of graphics cards.
Power consumption while under peak load
150 W
Market range: <106 W – >365 W
This graphics card draws 150 W under peak load, which is lower than 75.9% of graphics cards and equal to 1.4% of graphics cards.
Recommended PSU wattage
450 W
Market range: <450 W – >850 W
This graphics card recommends a 450 W PSU, which is lower than that of 84% of graphics cards and equal to that of 6.1% of graphics cards.
Board power limit
150 W
Market range: <107 W – >400 W
This graphics card has a board power limit of 150 W, which is lower than that of 75.6% of graphics cards and equal to that of 1.9% of graphics cards.
PCIe power spec
160 W
Show more
Size
283x 129x 54 mm
Length
282.6 mm
Market range: <200 mm – >337 mm
This graphics card is 282.6 mm long, which is longer than 50.1% of graphics cards.
Height
128.5 mm
Market range: <109 mm – >146 mm
This graphics card is 128.5 mm tall, which is taller than 57.6% of graphics cards and equal in height to 0.1% of graphics cards.
Slot width
2.7 slot/s
Market range: <2 slot/s – >3.25 slot/s
This graphics card occupies 2.7 slot/s, which is wider than 65.9% of graphics cards and equal in width to 2.2% of graphics cards.
Weight
522 g
Market range: <541 g – >2k g
This graphics card weighs 522 g, which is lighter than 90.1% of Graphics cards and equal to 0.1% of Graphics cards.
Show more

ASUS TUF 3 Radeon RX 5600 XT Evo Gaming 6G OC vs the average graphics card

246810TotalPerformanceMemoryFeaturesConnectivityPowerDesign
  • 30.8% lower PSU requirement
    This graphics card has a lower PSU requirement than the average graphics card (450 W vs 650 W). The average graphics card has a PSU requirement of 650 W.
    450 W vs 650 W
  • 30.2% lower TDP
    This graphics card has a lower TDP than the average graphics card (150 W vs 215 W). The average graphics card has a TDP of 215 W.
    150 W vs 215 W
  • 31.8% lower board power limit
    This graphics card has a lower board power limit than the average graphics card (150 W vs 220 W). The average graphics card has a board power limit of 220 W.
    150 W vs 220 W
  • More FP64 throughput
    This graphics card has a better FP64 ratio than the average graphics card (1:16 vs 1:64).
    1:16 vs 1:64
  • 6.4 dB quieter under load
    This graphics card has a lower load noise level than the average graphics card (29 dB vs 35.4 dB). The average graphics card has a load noise level of 35.4 dB.
    29 dB vs 35.4 dB
  • 2x cheaper
    ASUS TUF 3 Radeon RX 5600 XT Evo Gaming 6G OC is cheaper than the average graphics card (£260 vs £520).
    £260 vs £520
  • 7 °C lower load temperature
    This graphics card has a lower load temperature than the average graphics card (60 °C vs 67 °C). The average graphics card has a load temperature of 67 °C.
    60 °C vs 67 °C
  • 48.5% lighter
    This graphics card is lighter than the average graphics card (522 g vs 1,014 g). The average graphics card weighs 1,014 g.
    522 g vs 1,014 g
  • 2x cheaper
    ASUS TUF 3 Radeon RX 5600 XT Evo Gaming 6G OC is cheaper than the average graphics card (£260 vs £520).
    £260 vs £520
  • More FP64 throughput
    This graphics card has a better FP64 ratio than the average graphics card (1:16 vs 1:64).
    1:16 vs 1:64
  • 30.8% lower PSU requirement
    This graphics card has a lower PSU requirement than the average graphics card (450 W vs 650 W). The average graphics card has a PSU requirement of 650 W.
    450 W vs 650 W
  • 30.2% lower TDP
    This graphics card has a lower TDP than the average graphics card (150 W vs 215 W). The average graphics card has a TDP of 215 W.
    150 W vs 215 W
  • 31.8% lower board power limit
    This graphics card has a lower board power limit than the average graphics card (150 W vs 220 W). The average graphics card has a board power limit of 220 W.
    150 W vs 220 W
  • 6.4 dB quieter under load
    This graphics card has a lower load noise level than the average graphics card (29 dB vs 35.4 dB). The average graphics card has a load noise level of 35.4 dB.
    29 dB vs 35.4 dB
  • 7 °C lower load temperature
    This graphics card has a lower load temperature than the average graphics card (60 °C vs 67 °C). The average graphics card has a load temperature of 67 °C.
    60 °C vs 67 °C
  • 48.5% lighter
    This graphics card is lighter than the average graphics card (522 g vs 1,014 g). The average graphics card weighs 1,014 g.
    522 g vs 1,014 g
  • 6 GB less VRAM
    This graphics card has fewer VRAM than the average graphics card (6 GB vs 12 GB). The average graphics card has 12 GB VRAM.
    6 GB vs 12 GB
  • 40 fewer ray tracing cores
    This graphics card has fewer ray tracing cores than the average graphics card (0 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 ray tracing cores.
    0 vs 40
  • 29.3% lower boost clock speed
    This graphics card has a lower boost GPU clock than the average graphics card (1,770 MHz vs 2,505 MHz). The average graphics card has a boost GPU clock of 2,505 MHz.
    1,770 MHz vs 2,505 MHz
  • Less advanced frame generation
    This graphics card has less advanced frame generation than the average graphics card (no vs multi frame generation).
  • No CUDA support
    This graphics card does not support CUDA, the average graphics card does.
  • 26.4% lower review score
    Reviews score
    5.3/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
    How we count it
    Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves. Big test sites count more, short reviews half as much as full tests. A video review counts half.
    Score: The average grade is 80% of the review mark; the number of reviews is the other 20% (1 review = 5, the typical number in this category = 8, the most-reviewed model = 10).
    Enough data: With few reviews, the average grade is pulled toward the typical grade of this category. No reviews yet: 7.6 for now.
    Share: Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
    Score distribution
    â–¼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    â–¼ Worse than 87% of models

    5.3

    Mark 7.7 is below the typical mark 7.9 of this category, so it cannot lift the score above the technical score

    80%

    8.4

    Average grade

    20%

    5.0

    Popularity

    Grades by review (1)
    1 review, with a printed score. Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
    User ratings collected online are not part of this score.
    5.3 vs 7.2
  • No DLSS support
    This graphics card does not support DLSS, the average graphics card does.
  • No ray tracing
    This graphics card does not support ray tracing, the average graphics card does.
  • 26.4% lower review score
    Reviews score
    5.3/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
    How we count it
    Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves. Big test sites count more, short reviews half as much as full tests. A video review counts half.
    Score: The average grade is 80% of the review mark; the number of reviews is the other 20% (1 review = 5, the typical number in this category = 8, the most-reviewed model = 10).
    Enough data: With few reviews, the average grade is pulled toward the typical grade of this category. No reviews yet: 7.6 for now.
    Share: Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
    Score distribution
    â–¼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    â–¼ Worse than 87% of models

    5.3

    Mark 7.7 is below the typical mark 7.9 of this category, so it cannot lift the score above the technical score

    80%

    8.4

    Average grade

    20%

    5.0

    Popularity

    Grades by review (1)
    1 review, with a printed score. Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
    User ratings collected online are not part of this score.
    5.3 vs 7.2
  • 32.1% lower sentiment score
    5.3 vs 7.8
  • 8.1% worse value for money
    ASUS TUF 3 Radeon RX 5600 XT Evo Gaming 6G OC has worse value for money than the average graphics card (6.86 vs 7.4).
    6.86 vs 7.41
  • 29.3% lower boost clock speed
    This graphics card has a lower boost GPU clock than the average graphics card (1,770 MHz vs 2,505 MHz). The average graphics card has a boost GPU clock of 2,505 MHz.
    1,770 MHz vs 2,505 MHz
  • 40 fewer ray tracing cores
    This graphics card has fewer ray tracing cores than the average graphics card (0 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 ray tracing cores.
    0 vs 40
  • No CUDA support
    This graphics card does not support CUDA, the average graphics card does.
  • 27.1% lower base clock speed
    This graphics card has a lower base GPU clock than the average graphics card (1,400 MHz vs 1920 MHz). The average graphics card has a base GPU clock of 1920 MHz.
    1,400 MHz vs 1,920 MHz
  • 144 fewer AI cores
    This graphics card has fewer AI cores than the average graphics card (0 vs 144). The average graphics card has 144 AI cores.
    0 vs 144
  • 33.3% lower texture rate
    This graphics card has a lower texture rate than the average graphics card (252 GTexel/s vs 378 GTexel/s). The average graphics card has a texture rate of 378 GTexel/s.
    252 GTexel/s vs 378 GTexel/s
  • 64.3% lower FP32 performance
    This graphics card has a lower FP32 performance than the average graphics card (8.1 TFLOPS vs 22.6 TFLOPS). The average graphics card has FP32 performance of 22.6 TFLOPS.
    8.06 TFLOPS vs 22.6 TFLOPS
  • 29.8% lower pixel rate
    This graphics card has a lower pixel rate than the average graphics card (113.3 GPixel/s vs 161.3 GPixel/s). The average graphics card has a pixel rate of 161.3 GPixel/s.
    113.3 GPixel/s vs 161.3 GPixel/s
  • 40 fewer TMUs
    This graphics card has fewer TMUs than the average graphics card (144 vs 184). The average graphics card has 184 TMUs.
    144 vs 184
  • 52.2% lower gaming score
    This graphics card has a lower gaming score than the average graphics card (7,057 points vs 14,779 points). The average graphics card has a gaming score of 14,779 points.
    7,057 points vs 14,779 points
  • 3 years older
    This graphics card was released earlier than the average graphics card (2020 vs 2023).
    January 2020
    2020 vs 2023
  • 4 fewer compute units
    This graphics card has fewer compute units than the average graphics card (36 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 compute units.
    36 vs 40
  • 30.1% lower PassMark score
    This graphics card has a lower PassMark score than the average graphics card (15,822 points vs 22,638 points). The average graphics card has a PassMark score of 22,638 points.
    15,822 points vs 22,638 points
  • 48.5% lower compute score
    This graphics card has a lower compute score than the average graphics card (6,219 points vs 12,70.5 points). The average graphics card has a compute score of 12,070.5 points.
    6,219 points vs 12,070.5 points
  • 6 GB less VRAM
    This graphics card has fewer VRAM than the average graphics card (6 GB vs 12 GB). The average graphics card has 12 GB VRAM.
    6 GB vs 12 GB
  • 26.3% slower memory speed
    This graphics card has a lower effective memory speed than the average graphics card (14,000 MHz vs 19,000 MHz). The average graphics card reaches an effective memory speed of 19,000 MHz.
    14,000 MHz vs 19,000 MHz
  • 25% lower memory bandwidth
    This graphics card has a lower memory bandwidth than the average graphics card (336 GB/s vs 448 GB/s). The average graphics card has a memory bandwidth of 448 GB/s.
    336 GB/s vs 448 GB/s
  • 87.5% smaller L2 cache
    This graphics card has fewer L2 cache than the average graphics card (3 MB vs 24 MB). The average graphics card has 24 MB L2 cache.
    3 MB vs 24 MB
  • 87.5% smaller L1 cache
    This graphics card has fewer L1 cache than the average graphics card (16 KB vs 128 KB). The average graphics card has 128 KB L1 cache.
    16 KB vs 128 KB
  • Less advanced frame generation
    This graphics card has less advanced frame generation than the average graphics card (no vs multi frame generation).
  • No DLSS support
    This graphics card does not support DLSS, the average graphics card does.
  • No ray tracing
    This graphics card does not support ray tracing, the average graphics card does.
  • 40% larger process node
    This graphics card uses a larger manufacturing process than the average graphics card (7 nm vs 5 nm). The average graphics card uses a manufacturing process of 5 nm.
    7 nm vs 5 nm
  • No AI upscalers
    This graphics card does not support AI upscalers, the average graphics card does.
  • No XeSS support
    This graphics card does not support XeSS, the average graphics card does.
  • No mesh shaders
    This graphics card does not support mesh shaders, the average graphics card does.
  • Older Vulkan version
    This graphics card supports an older Vulkan version than the average graphics card (1.3 vs 1.4).
    1.3 vs 1.4
  • Older DirectX version
    This graphics card supports an older DirectX version than the average graphics card (12 vs 12 Ultimate).
    12 vs 12 Ultimate
  • Older OpenCL version
    This graphics card supports an older OpenCL version than the average graphics card (2 vs 3).
    2 vs 3
  • No sampler feedback
    This graphics card does not support sampler feedback, the average graphics card does.
  • 55% fewer transistors
    This graphics card has fewer transistors than the average graphics card (10,300 million vs 22,900 million). The average graphics card has 22,900 million transistors.
    10,300 million vs 22,900 million
  • No AV1 encoding
    This graphics card does not support AV1 encoding, the average graphics card does.
  • Older HDMI version
    This graphics card supports an older HDMI version than the average graphics card (2.0b vs 2.1a).
    2.0b vs 2.1a
  • No AV1 decoding
    This graphics card does not support AV1 decoding, the average graphics card does.
  • More basic codec support
    This graphics card encodes more basic formats than the average graphics card (H.264/H.265 vs H.264/H.265/AV1/VP9).
    H.264/H.265 vs H.264/H.265/AV1/VP9
  • Older DisplayPort version
    This graphics card supports an older DisplayPort version than the average graphics card (1.4 vs 1.4a).
    1.4 vs 1.4a
  • No dual BIOS
    This graphics card does not include dual BIOS, the average graphics card does.
  • 15 °C lower thermal ceiling
    This graphics card has a lower thermal ceiling than the average graphics card (110 °C vs 95 °C). The average graphics card has a thermal ceiling of 95 °C.
    110 °C vs 95 °C
  • 17 °C higher idle temperature
    This graphics card has a higher idle temperature than the average graphics card (54 °C vs 37 °C). The average graphics card has an idle temperature of 37 °C.
    54 °C vs 37 °C
  • No RGB lighting
    This graphics card does not include RGB lighting, the average graphics card does.
  • 0.2 slot/s wider design
    This graphics card occupies more slots than the average graphics card (2.7 slot/s vs 2.5 slot/s). The average graphics card occupies 2.5 slot/s.
    2.7 slot/s vs 2.5 slot/s

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

Not graded

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

10
techpowerup.com
✓ explicit
06/08/2020
Cooler review · Mid-range card
Verdict
ASUS Radeon RX 5600 XT TUF EVO is a 1080p card with a redesigned cooler, but its memory ships slower than other RX 5600 XT cards until a BIOS update.

Third-party reviews

What customers like about ASUS TUF 3 Radeon RX 5600 XT Evo Gaming 6G OC

  • Excellent 1080p performance, often exceeding 60 FPS in AAA titles at high settings.
  • Effective cooling with the updated 'EVO' heatsink and Axial-tech fans, keeping temperatures consistently low.
  • Extremely quiet operation, including a 0dB fan-stop mode during light use.
  • High energy efficiency compared to previous AMD generations like Polaris or Vega.
  • Solid build quality featuring a durable metal backplate.
  • Reliable frame pacing and low-latency responsiveness due to RDNA architecture.

What customers don't like about ASUS TUF 3 Radeon RX 5600 XT Evo Gaming 6G OC

  • Requires a manual VBIOS update to achieve maximum performance (14 Gbps memory speed).
  • Limited VRAM (6GB) compared to some competitors, which can bottleneck performance at higher resolutions or in newer titles.
  • No hardware-accelerated ray tracing support.
  • Initial driver instability and occasional system crashes reported by some users during setup.
  • Higher initial retail price compared to other RX 5600 XT models like the Sapphire Pulse.
  • Lack of advanced software features like AV1 support or high-end AI upscaling.

Verdict

The ASUS TUF Gaming 3 Radeon RX 5600 XT Evo Gaming 6G OC is a factory-overclocked mid-range graphics card designed for elite 1080p gaming, featuring the 7nm RDNA 1.0 architecture with 2,304 stream processors. It is equipped with 6GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit interface, delivering an effective memory speed of 14 Gbps and a boost clock reaching up to 1770 MHz in OC mode. Key characteristics include a robust triple-axial-tech fan cooling system with dual ball bearings, a protective metal backplate, and a 2.7-slot design for improved thermal dissipation. Its primary advantages are its quiet operation via 0dB technology, high energy efficiency at a 150W TDP, and smooth frame rates in AAA titles. However, notable drawbacks include its lack of hardware-accelerated ray tracing, the requirement for a manual BIOS update to reach peak 14 Gbps memory speeds on some earlier batches, and its architectural limitation for high-performance 1440p or 4K gaming.

Compare ASUS TUF 3 Radeon RX 5600 XT Evo Gaming 6G OC with other products in the Graphics cards category

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of ASUS TUF 3 Radeon RX 5600 XT Evo Gaming 6G OC and other products in the Graphics cards category

No results found