Scored using Graphics cards Methodology v3.0
Graphics cards Methodology v3.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontum Graphics cards Methodology v3.0: the technical score from the specifications is the base, and independent expert and video reviews (up to ±0.5 points), owner opinions (up to ±0.3) and best-of lists (up to +0.3) move it up or down.
Explore Graphics cards Methodology v3.0

ASRock Arc Pro B60 Creator 24GB review: 117 specs compared

Avg. price:~£260VRAM:24 GBMemory bus width:?Thermal Design Power (TDP):?

ASRock Arc Pro B60 Creator 24GB Review: Compare 117 technical specifications and 1 expert and video reviews to see how this product ranks in the Graphics cards category and whether it is worth buying.

ASRock Arc Pro B60 Creator 24GB
7.7/10

Overall score

Score
7.7/ 10
✕
What it is
Our main score for this model, 1–10. It combines specs, expert reviews, best-of lists and owners.
How we count it
Parts: Technical score 40%, Reviews score 25%, List score 25%, Sentiment score 10%
Marks: Each part gets a mark out of 10. For reviews, lists and owners, a typical model in this category gets about 8 and the best one gets 10.
No data yet: A part with no data shows "?". It counts as the mark of a weaker model in this category (4 in 5 models with data score higher). This way, models with reviews, lists and owners usually come out ahead.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

40%

8.2

Technical score

25%

7.1

Reviews score

25%

?

List scoreNot enough data yet, so we use 7.5, the mark of a weaker model in this category

10%

?

Sentiment scoreNot enough data yet, so we use 7.8, the mark of a weaker model in this category

â–²Better than 60% of graphics cards
8.1

Value for money

Value for money
8.1/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the graphics card's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a graphics card that offers a strong balance of performance, features, and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

7.7

Overall score

30%

9.2

Price

★Better than 98%
8.2

Technical score

Technical score
8.2/ 10
✕
What it is
How good the specs are compared with the other models in this category, 1–10.
How we count it
Areas: We rate the specs in each area against the other models in this category.
Weighting: The areas that matter most to buyers count more. The shares are shown under Score components.
Share: The technical score is 40% of the overall score.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

44%

8.0

Performance

24%

8.7

Memory

12%

7.5

Power

11%

8.1

Features

5%

8.8

Design

4%

8.3

Connectivity

â–²Better than 72%
7.1

Reviews score

Reviews score
7.1/ 10
✕
What it is
Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
How we count it
Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves. Big test sites count more, short reviews half as much as full tests. A video review counts half.
Score: The average grade is 80% of the review mark; the number of reviews is the other 20% (1 review = 5, the typical number in this category = 8, the most-reviewed model = 10).
Enough data: With few reviews, the average grade is pulled toward the typical grade of this category. No reviews yet: 7.6 for now.
Share: Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10

80%

7.6

Average grade

20%

5.0

Popularity

Grades by review (1)
1 video review, counting half as much as a written test. Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
User ratings collected online are not part of this score.
â–¼Worse than 69%
?

List score

List score
7.5/ 10
✕
What it is
How often independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers put this model in their best-of lists for this category.
How we count it
Points: The model in the most lists of this category gets 10; the others get 8 to 10 in proportion. In no list yet: 7.5. Lists count 25% of the overall score.
Enough data: Every list counts, even a single one. With fewer than 5 best-of lists in the category, this part is left out.
Lists with this model (0)
Not in any best-of list yet, so this part counts as 7.5. Models in a list get 8 to 10.
Not in any best-of list yet
  • asrock-arc-pro-b60-creator-24gb
  • asrock-arc-pro-b60-creator-24gb
  • asrock-arc-pro-b60-creator-24gb
  • asrock-arc-pro-b60-creator-24gb
asrock-arc-pro-b60-creator-24gb
asrock-arc-pro-b60-creator-24gb
asrock-arc-pro-b60-creator-24gb
asrock-arc-pro-b60-creator-24gb
Where to buy
*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
Best rankings
Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Loading...
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of graphics card ASRock Arc Pro B60 Creator 24GB

Technical score
Technical score
8.2/ 10
✕
What it is
How good the specs are compared with the other models in this category, 1–10.
How we count it
Areas: We rate the specs in each area against the other models in this category.
Weighting: The areas that matter most to buyers count more. The shares are shown under Score components.
Share: The technical score is 40% of the overall score.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

44%

8.0

Performance

24%

8.7

Memory

12%

7.5

Power

11%

8.1

Features

5%

8.8

Design

4%

8.3

Connectivity

8.2
Reviews score
7.1
List score
?
Value for money
Value for money
8.1/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the graphics card's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a graphics card that offers a strong balance of performance, features, and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

70%

7.7

Overall score

30%

9.2

Price

8.1
3DMark Time Spy benchmark score
?
3DMark Port Royal score
?
PassMark (G3D) result
?
PassMark (DirectCompute) result
?
FP32 performance
?
Show more
VRAM
24 GB
This graphics card has 24 GB of VRAM, which is more than 91.2% of graphics cards and equal to 5.5% of graphics cards.
Memory type
?
Memory bus width
?
Maximum memory bandwidth
?
Effective memory speed
?
Show more
PCI Express (PCIe) version
?
PCIe lanes
?
DirectX version
?
Vulkan version
?
OpenGL version
?
Show more
Max displays supported
?
Max digital resolution
?
DisplayPort outputs
4
This graphics card offers 4 DisplayPort outputs, which is more than 97.8% of graphics cards and equal to 2.1% of graphics cards.
DisplayPort version
?
DisplayPort link rates
?
Show more
Thermal Design Power (TDP)
?
Power consumption while under peak load
200 W
This graphics card draws 200 W under peak load, which is lower than 53.4% of graphics cards and equal to 3.6% of graphics cards.
Recommended PSU wattage
?
Board power limit
200 W
This graphics card has a board power limit of 200 W, which is lower than that of 55.1% of graphics cards and equal to that of 2.6% of graphics cards.
PCIe power spec
200 W
Show more
Size
?
Length
271 mm
This graphics card is 271 mm long, which is shorter than 56.4% of graphics cards and equal in length to 0.1% of graphics cards.
Height
112 mm
This graphics card is 112 mm tall, which is shorter than 76.6% of graphics cards and equal in height to 3.2% of graphics cards.
Slot width
2 slot/s
This graphics card occupies 2 slot/s, which is slimmer than 52.4% of graphics cards and equal in width to 43.4% of graphics cards.
Weight
1,118 g
This graphics card weighs 1,118 g, which is heavier than 56.7% of Graphics cards.
Show more

ASRock Arc Pro B60 Creator 24GB vs the average graphics card

246810TotalPerformanceMemoryFeaturesConnectivityPowerDesign
  • 12 GB more VRAM
    This graphics card has more VRAM than the average graphics card (24 GB vs 12 GB). The average graphics card has 12 GB VRAM.
    24 GB vs 12 GB
  • 1 more DisplayPort outputs
    This graphics card has more DisplayPort outputs than the average graphics card (4 vs 3). The average graphics card has 3 DisplayPort outputs.
    4 vs 3
  • 0.5 slot/s slimmer design
    This graphics card occupies fewer slots than the average graphics card (2 slot/s vs 2.5 slot/s). The average graphics card occupies 2.5 slot/s.
    2 slot/s vs 2.5 slot/s
  • 13 mm lower card height
    This graphics card is shorter than the average graphics card (112 mm vs 125 mm). The average graphics card has a height of 125 mm.
    112 mm vs 125 mm
  • 9.8% better value for money
    ASRock Arc Pro B60 Creator 24GB has better value for money than the average graphics card (8.14 vs 7.4).
    8.14 vs 7.41
  • 2x cheaper
    ASRock Arc Pro B60 Creator 24GB is cheaper than the average graphics card (£260 vs £520).
    £260 vs £520
  • 4.2% higher base clock speed
    This graphics card has a higher base GPU clock than the average graphics card (2000 MHz vs 1920 MHz). The average graphics card has a base GPU clock of 1920 MHz.
    2,000 MHz vs 1,920 MHz
  • 9.8% better value for money
    ASRock Arc Pro B60 Creator 24GB has better value for money than the average graphics card (8.14 vs 7.4).
    8.14 vs 7.41
  • 2x cheaper
    ASRock Arc Pro B60 Creator 24GB is cheaper than the average graphics card (£260 vs £520).
    £260 vs £520
  • 4.2% higher base clock speed
    This graphics card has a higher base GPU clock than the average graphics card (2000 MHz vs 1920 MHz). The average graphics card has a base GPU clock of 1920 MHz.
    2,000 MHz vs 1,920 MHz
  • 12 GB more VRAM
    This graphics card has more VRAM than the average graphics card (24 GB vs 12 GB). The average graphics card has 12 GB VRAM.
    24 GB vs 12 GB
  • 1 more DisplayPort outputs
    This graphics card has more DisplayPort outputs than the average graphics card (4 vs 3). The average graphics card has 3 DisplayPort outputs.
    4 vs 3
  • 13 mm lower card height
    This graphics card is shorter than the average graphics card (112 mm vs 125 mm). The average graphics card has a height of 125 mm.
    112 mm vs 125 mm
  • 0.5 slot/s slimmer design
    This graphics card occupies fewer slots than the average graphics card (2 slot/s vs 2.5 slot/s). The average graphics card occupies 2.5 slot/s.
    2 slot/s vs 2.5 slot/s
  • 2 fewer fans
    This graphics card has fewer fans than the average graphics card (1 vs 3).
    1 vs 3
  • No CUDA support
    This graphics card does not support CUDA, the average graphics card does.
  • No DLSS support
    This graphics card does not support DLSS, the average graphics card does.
  • 4.2% lower boost clock speed
    This graphics card has a lower boost GPU clock than the average graphics card (2,400 MHz vs 2,505 MHz). The average graphics card has a boost GPU clock of 2,505 MHz.
    2,400 MHz vs 2,505 MHz
  • No RGB lighting
    This graphics card does not include RGB lighting, the average graphics card does.
  • No HDMI output
    This graphics card does not include HDMI output, the average graphics card does.
  • No CUDA support
    This graphics card does not support CUDA, the average graphics card does.
  • 4.2% lower boost clock speed
    This graphics card has a lower boost GPU clock than the average graphics card (2,400 MHz vs 2,505 MHz). The average graphics card has a boost GPU clock of 2,505 MHz.
    2,400 MHz vs 2,505 MHz
  • No DLSS support
    This graphics card does not support DLSS, the average graphics card does.
  • No HDMI output
    This graphics card does not include HDMI output, the average graphics card does.
  • 2 fewer fans
    This graphics card has fewer fans than the average graphics card (1 vs 3).
    1 vs 3
  • No RGB lighting
    This graphics card does not include RGB lighting, the average graphics card does.

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

5.0
ReSpawn PC
≈ estimated
06/02/2026
Hands-on review · gaming benchmarks at 1440p
Verdict
ASRock Arc Pro B60 Creator 24GB is playable in most 1440p games, but clearly slower than the B580, so it's hard to recommend for gaming.
8.0
ReSpawn PC
≈ estimated
04/02/2026
Hands-on test · AI image and video generation
Verdict
ASRock Arc Pro B60 Creator 24GB suits AI image work thanks to its 24GB VRAM, but the driver setup alongside a gaming card is frustrating.
Hands-on video, no verdict
Hands-on video, no verdict
Overview video
Overview video

Third-party reviews

What customers like about ASRock Arc Pro B60 Creator 24GB

  • 24 GB of memory handles large scenes and AI models.
  • Four DisplayPort outputs drive several monitors at once.
  • At 112 mm high, it suits compact cases.
  • Fan stop lets the fan switch off at low load.
  • Overclocking support gives room to tune the card.
  • A backplate adds rigidity to the board.

What customers don't like about ASRock Arc Pro B60 Creator 24GB

  • No HDMI ports, so HDMI monitors need an adapter.
  • Only one fan, so the cooling depends on case airflow.
  • It draws 200 W under peak load, which adds heat to the case.
  • No CUDA support, so CUDA-only creative software will not use this card.
  • No DLSS support, so DLSS-only games do not get that upscaling.
  • At 1118 g it is heavy and needs a secure mount.

Verdict

24 GB of memory is the reason to look at the ASRock Arc Pro B60 Creator 24GB, a budget card for creative work. That leaves room for big 3D scenes and large AI models on one card. Four DisplayPort outputs let it drive several screens at once, and the 112 mm height suits a compact case. A backplate and overclocking support round out the build. The trade-off is HDMI: there are no HDMI ports at all, so you need a DisplayPort monitor or an adapter. It has one fan, and it draws 200 W under peak load, so the case needs decent airflow. At 1118 g it is heavy, so a sturdy mount matters. It suits a creator who needs lots of video memory and is not chasing DLSS for games.

Compare ASRock Arc Pro B60 Creator 24GB with other products in the Graphics cards category

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of ASRock Arc Pro B60 Creator 24GB and other products in the Graphics cards category

No results found