OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS
Scored using Graphics cards Methodology v3.0
Graphics cards Methodology v3.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontum Graphics cards Methodology v3.0: the technical score from the specifications is the base, and independent expert and video reviews (up to ±0.5 points), owner opinions (up to ±0.3) and best-of lists (up to +0.3) move it up or down.
Explore Graphics cards Methodology v3.0

ASRock Arc Pro B65 Creator 32GB review: 117 specs compared

Avg. price:~£260VRAM:32 GBMemory bus width:?Thermal Design Power (TDP):?

ASRock Arc Pro B65 Creator 32GB Review: Compare 117 technical specifications to see how this product ranks in the Graphics cards category and whether it is worth buying.

ASRock Arc Pro B65 Creator 32GB
7.8/10

Overall score

Score
7.8/ 10
✕
What it is
Our main score for this model, 1–10. It combines specs, expert reviews, best-of lists and owners.
How we count it
Parts: Technical score 40%, Reviews score 25%, List score 25%, Sentiment score 10%
Marks: Each part gets a mark out of 10. For reviews, lists and owners, a typical model in this category gets about 8 and the best one gets 10.
No data yet: A part with no data shows "?". It counts as the mark of a weaker model in this category (4 in 5 models with data score higher). This way, models with reviews, lists and owners usually come out ahead.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 64% of models
Score components

40%

8.1

Technical score

25%

?

Reviews scoreNot enough data yet, so we use 7.6, the mark of a weaker model in this category

25%

?

List scoreNot enough data yet, so we use 7.5, the mark of a weaker model in this category

10%

?

Sentiment scoreNot enough data yet, so we use 7.8, the mark of a weaker model in this category

â–²Better than 64% of graphics cards
8.2

Value for money

Value for money
8.2/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the graphics card's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a graphics card that offers a strong balance of performance, features, and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
★ Better than 99% of models
Score components

70%

7.8

Overall score

30%

9.2

Price

★Better than 99%
8.1

Technical score

Technical score
8.1/ 10
✕
What it is
How good the specs are compared with the other models in this category, 1–10.
How we count it
Areas: We rate the specs in each area against the other models in this category.
Weighting: The areas that matter most to buyers count more. The shares are shown under Score components.
Share: The technical score is 40% of the overall score.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 71% of models
Score components

44%

8.2

Performance

24%

8.5

Memory

12%

6.7

Power

11%

8.4

Features

5%

8.8

Design

4%

8.7

Connectivity

â–²Better than 71%
?

Reviews score

Reviews score
✕
What it is
Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
How we count it
Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves. Big test sites count more, short reviews half as much as full tests. A video review counts half.
Score: The average grade is 80% of the review mark; the number of reviews is the other 20% (1 review = 5, the typical number in this category = 8, the most-reviewed model = 10).
Enough data: With few reviews, the average grade is pulled toward the typical grade of this category. No reviews yet: 7.6 for now.
Share: Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Grades by review (0)
We have not found an independent test of this model yet. Until we do, its review part counts as 7.6.
User ratings collected online are not part of this score.
No expert tests yet
?

List score

List score
7.5/ 10
✕
What it is
How often independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers put this model in their best-of lists for this category.
How we count it
Points: The model in the most lists of this category gets 10; the others get 8 to 10 in proportion. In no list yet: 7.5. Lists count 25% of the overall score.
Enough data: Every list counts, even a single one. With fewer than 5 best-of lists in the category, this part is left out.
Lists with this model (0)
Not in any best-of list yet, so this part counts as 7.5. Models in a list get 8 to 10.
Not in any best-of list yet
  • asrock-arc-pro-b65-creator-32gb
  • asrock-arc-pro-b65-creator-32gb
  • asrock-arc-pro-b65-creator-32gb
asrock-arc-pro-b65-creator-32gb
asrock-arc-pro-b65-creator-32gb
asrock-arc-pro-b65-creator-32gb
Where to buy
*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
Best rankings
Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Loading category ranking...

Graphics cards model ranking

Ranked #464 of 2,260 models in Graphics cards (Overall score)

Technical Specifications of graphics card ASRock Arc Pro B65 Creator 32GB

Technical score
Technical score
8.1/ 10
✕
What it is
How good the specs are compared with the other models in this category, 1–10.
How we count it
Areas: We rate the specs in each area against the other models in this category.
Weighting: The areas that matter most to buyers count more. The shares are shown under Score components.
Share: The technical score is 40% of the overall score.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 71% of models
Score components:

44%

8.2

Performance

24%

8.5

Memory

12%

6.7

Power

11%

8.4

Features

5%

8.8

Design

4%

8.7

Connectivity

8.1
Reviews score
7.6
List score
?
Value for money
Value for money
8.2/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the graphics card's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a graphics card that offers a strong balance of performance, features, and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
★ Better than 99% of models
Score components:

70%

7.8

Overall score

30%

9.2

Price

8.2
3DMark Time Spy benchmark score
?
3DMark Port Royal score
?
PassMark (G3D) result
?
PassMark (DirectCompute) result
?
FP32 performance
?
Show more
VRAM
32 GB
Market range: <4 GB – >24 GB
This graphics card has 32 GB of VRAM, which is more than 96.6% of graphics cards and equal to 3.1% of graphics cards.
Memory type
GDDR6
This graphics card uses GDDR6 memory, which is newer than on 16.4% of graphics cards and equal to 40.3% of graphics cards.
Memory bus width
?
Maximum memory bandwidth
?
Effective memory speed
19,000 MHz
Market range: <7k MHz – >28k MHz
This graphics card reaches an effective memory speed of 19,000 MHz, which is faster than that of 48.5% of graphics cards and equal to that of 3.2% of graphics cards.
Show more
PCI Express (PCIe) version
5
This graphics card supports PCIe 5, which is newer than on 73% of graphics cards and equal to 27% of graphics cards.
PCIe lanes
?
DirectX version
?
Vulkan version
?
OpenGL version
4.6
This graphics card supports OpenGL 4.6, which is more advanced than on 2% of graphics cards and equal to 98% of graphics cards.
Show more
Max displays supported
4
Market range: <4 – >4
This graphics card supports up to 4 displays, which is more than 9% of graphics cards and equal to 88.2% of graphics cards.
Max digital resolution
?
DisplayPort outputs
4
Market range: <1 – >3
This graphics card offers 4 DisplayPort outputs, which is more than 97.8% of graphics cards and equal to 2.1% of graphics cards.
DisplayPort version
2.1
This graphics card supports DisplayPort 2.1, which is more advanced than on 66.4% of graphics cards and equal to 7.7% of graphics cards.
DisplayPort link rates
?
Show more
Thermal Design Power (TDP)
?
Power consumption while under peak load
200 W
Market range: <100 W – >400 W
This graphics card draws 200 W under peak load, which is lower than 53.4% of graphics cards and equal to 3.6% of graphics cards.
Recommended PSU wattage
?
Board power limit
200 W
Market range: <100 W – >400 W
This graphics card has a board power limit of 200 W, which is lower than that of 55.1% of graphics cards and equal to that of 2.6% of graphics cards.
PCIe power spec
200 W
Show more
Size
?
Length
271 mm
Market range: <200 mm – >350 mm
This graphics card is 271 mm long, which is shorter than 56.4% of graphics cards and equal in length to 0.1% of graphics cards.
Height
112 mm
Market range: <109 mm – >146 mm
This graphics card is 112 mm tall, which is shorter than 76.6% of graphics cards and equal in height to 3.2% of graphics cards.
Slot width
2 slot/s
Market range: <2 slot/s – >3.25 slot/s
This graphics card occupies 2 slot/s, which is slimmer than 52.4% of graphics cards and equal in width to 43.4% of graphics cards.
Weight
1,057 g
Market range: <500 g – >2k g
This graphics card weighs 1,057 g, which is heavier than 52.2% of Graphics cards and equal to 0.1% of Graphics cards.
Show more

ASRock Arc Pro B65 Creator 32GB vs the average graphics card

246810TotalPerformanceMemoryFeaturesConnectivityPowerDesign
  • 20 GB more VRAM
    This graphics card has more VRAM than the average graphics card (32 GB vs 12 GB). The average graphics card has 12 GB VRAM.
    32 GB vs 12 GB
  • 25% higher base clock speed
    This graphics card has a higher base GPU clock than the average graphics card (2,400 MHz vs 1920 MHz). The average graphics card has a base GPU clock of 1920 MHz.
    2,400 MHz vs 1,920 MHz
  • Newer PCIe version
    This graphics card supports a newer PCIe version than the average graphics card (5 vs 4).
    5.0 vs 4.0
  • 1 more DisplayPort outputs
    This graphics card has more DisplayPort outputs than the average graphics card (4 vs 3). The average graphics card has 3 DisplayPort outputs.
    4 vs 3
  • 0.5 slot/s slimmer design
    This graphics card occupies fewer slots than the average graphics card (2 slot/s vs 2.5 slot/s). The average graphics card occupies 2.5 slot/s.
    2 slot/s vs 2.5 slot/s
  • 13 mm lower card height
    This graphics card is shorter than the average graphics card (112 mm vs 125 mm). The average graphics card has a height of 125 mm.
    112 mm vs 125 mm
  • Newer DisplayPort version
    This graphics card supports a newer DisplayPort version than the average graphics card (2.1 vs 1.4a).
    2.1 vs 1.4a
  • 10.7% better value for money
    ASRock Arc Pro B65 Creator 32GB has better value for money than the average graphics card (8.21 vs 7.4).
    8.21 vs 7.41
  • 10.7% better value for money
    ASRock Arc Pro B65 Creator 32GB has better value for money than the average graphics card (8.21 vs 7.4).
    8.21 vs 7.41
  • 2x cheaper
    ASRock Arc Pro B65 Creator 32GB is cheaper than the average graphics card (£260 vs £520).
    £260 vs £520
  • 25% higher base clock speed
    This graphics card has a higher base GPU clock than the average graphics card (2,400 MHz vs 1920 MHz). The average graphics card has a base GPU clock of 1920 MHz.
    2,400 MHz vs 1,920 MHz
  • 20 GB more VRAM
    This graphics card has more VRAM than the average graphics card (32 GB vs 12 GB). The average graphics card has 12 GB VRAM.
    32 GB vs 12 GB
  • Newer PCIe version
    This graphics card supports a newer PCIe version than the average graphics card (5 vs 4).
    5.0 vs 4.0
  • 1 more DisplayPort outputs
    This graphics card has more DisplayPort outputs than the average graphics card (4 vs 3). The average graphics card has 3 DisplayPort outputs.
    4 vs 3
  • Newer DisplayPort version
    This graphics card supports a newer DisplayPort version than the average graphics card (2.1 vs 1.4a).
    2.1 vs 1.4a
  • 13 mm lower card height
    This graphics card is shorter than the average graphics card (112 mm vs 125 mm). The average graphics card has a height of 125 mm.
    112 mm vs 125 mm
  • 0.5 slot/s slimmer design
    This graphics card occupies fewer slots than the average graphics card (2 slot/s vs 2.5 slot/s). The average graphics card occupies 2.5 slot/s.
    2 slot/s vs 2.5 slot/s
  • 2 fewer fans
    This graphics card has fewer fans than the average graphics card (1 vs 3).
    1 vs 3
  • No CUDA support
    This graphics card does not support CUDA, the average graphics card does.
  • 4.2% lower boost clock speed
    This graphics card has a lower boost GPU clock than the average graphics card (2,400 MHz vs 2,505 MHz). The average graphics card has a boost GPU clock of 2,505 MHz.
    2,400 MHz vs 2,505 MHz
  • No RGB lighting
    This graphics card does not include RGB lighting, the average graphics card does.
  • No HDMI output
    This graphics card does not include HDMI output, the average graphics card does.
  • No CUDA support
    This graphics card does not support CUDA, the average graphics card does.
  • 4.2% lower boost clock speed
    This graphics card has a lower boost GPU clock than the average graphics card (2,400 MHz vs 2,505 MHz). The average graphics card has a boost GPU clock of 2,505 MHz.
    2,400 MHz vs 2,505 MHz
  • No HDMI output
    This graphics card does not include HDMI output, the average graphics card does.
  • 2 fewer fans
    This graphics card has fewer fans than the average graphics card (1 vs 3).
    1 vs 3
  • No RGB lighting
    This graphics card does not include RGB lighting, the average graphics card does.

Third-party reviews

What customers like about ASRock Arc Pro B65 Creator 32GB

  • 32 GB of GDDR6 memory handles very large scenes and datasets.
  • The same 2400 MHz boost and base clock keeps speed steady.
  • Four DisplayPort outputs drive four screens at once.
  • DisplayPort 2.1 is the current standard for high-resolution monitors.
  • A 112 mm height helps it fit tighter cases.
  • A backplate protects the back of the card.

What customers don't like about ASRock Arc Pro B65 Creator 32GB

  • There is no HDMI port or HDMI output, so older TVs need an adapter.
  • A single fan may run warmer under long loads.
  • There is no CUDA support, so some creative software may not work well.
  • At 1057 g it is heavy, and the card needs firm support in the case.
  • It draws 200 W at peak load, so the power supply should be solid.

Verdict

People who work with large scenes or big datasets often care more about memory than speed, and the ASRock Arc Pro B65 Creator 32GB is built with that in mind. Its 32 GB of GDDR6 memory is the main reason to buy it. Its 19000 MHz memory speed and 2400 MHz clock keep work moving. Four DisplayPort outputs drive up to four screens, and version 2.1 is the current standard. It is 271 mm long and 2 slots wide, and its 112 mm height helps it fit tighter cases. The trade-off is connections: no HDMI at all, and only one fan. It also has no CUDA support, which some creative software needs, and it draws 200 W. It suits a 3D artist or data worker who needs memory more than gaming extras.

Compare ASRock Arc Pro B65 Creator 32GB with other products in the Graphics cards category

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of ASRock Arc Pro B65 Creator 32GB and other products in the Graphics cards category

No results found