OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS
Scored using Graphics cards Methodology v3.0
Graphics cards Methodology v3.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontum Graphics cards Methodology v3.0: the technical score from the specifications is the base, and independent expert and video reviews (up to ±0.5 points), owner opinions (up to ±0.3) and best-of lists (up to +0.3) move it up or down.
Explore Graphics cards Methodology v3.0

MAXSUN Arc Pro B70 Turbo 32GB review: 117 specs compared

Avg. price:~£260VRAM:32 GBMemory bus width:?Thermal Design Power (TDP):?

MAXSUN Arc Pro B70 Turbo 32GB Review: Compare 117 technical specifications to see how this product ranks in the Graphics cards category and whether it is worth buying.

MAXSUN Arc Pro B70 Turbo 32GB
7.7/10

Overall score

Score
7.7/ 10
✕
What it is
Our main score for this model, 1–10. It combines specs, expert reviews, best-of lists and owners.
How we count it
Parts: Technical score 40%, Reviews score 25%, List score 25%, Sentiment score 10%
Marks: Each part gets a mark out of 10. For reviews, lists and owners, a typical model in this category gets about 8 and the best one gets 10.
No data yet: A part with no data shows "?". It counts as the mark of a weaker model in this category (4 in 5 models with data score higher). This way, models with reviews, lists and owners usually come out ahead.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 61% of models
Score components

40%

8.1

Technical score

25%

?

Reviews scoreNot enough data yet, so we use 7.6, the mark of a weaker model in this category

25%

?

List scoreNot enough data yet, so we use 7.5, the mark of a weaker model in this category

10%

7.2

Sentiment score

â–²Better than 61% of graphics cards
8.2

Value for money

Value for money
8.2/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the graphics card's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a graphics card that offers a strong balance of performance, features, and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
★ Better than 99% of models
Score components

70%

7.7

Overall score

30%

9.2

Price

★Better than 99%
8.1

Technical score

Technical score
8.1/ 10
✕
What it is
How good the specs are compared with the other models in this category, 1–10.
How we count it
Areas: We rate the specs in each area against the other models in this category.
Weighting: The areas that matter most to buyers count more. The shares are shown under Score components.
Share: The technical score is 40% of the overall score.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 71% of models
Score components

44%

7.9

Performance

24%

8.7

Memory

12%

7.3

Power

11%

8.1

Features

5%

8.6

Design

4%

8.4

Connectivity

â–²Better than 71%
?

Reviews score

Reviews score
✕
What it is
Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
How we count it
Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves. Big test sites count more, short reviews half as much as full tests. A video review counts half.
Score: The average grade is 80% of the review mark; the number of reviews is the other 20% (1 review = 5, the typical number in this category = 8, the most-reviewed model = 10).
Enough data: With few reviews, the average grade is pulled toward the typical grade of this category. No reviews yet: 7.6 for now.
Share: Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Grades by review (0)
We have not found an independent test of this model yet. Until we do, its review part counts as 7.6.
User ratings collected online are not part of this score.
No expert tests yet
?

List score

List score
7.5/ 10
✕
What it is
How often independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers put this model in their best-of lists for this category.
How we count it
Points: The model in the most lists of this category gets 10; the others get 8 to 10 in proportion. In no list yet: 7.5. Lists count 25% of the overall score.
Enough data: Every list counts, even a single one. With fewer than 5 best-of lists in the category, this part is left out.
Lists with this model (0)
Not in any best-of list yet, so this part counts as 7.5. Models in a list get 8 to 10.
Not in any best-of list yet
  • maxsun-arc-pro-b70-turbo-32gb
maxsun-arc-pro-b70-turbo-32gb
Where to buy
*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
Best rankings
Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.

What owners say about the MAXSUN Arc Pro B70 Turbo 32GB

Based on 78 owners sharing their experience in online comments

56%positive21%mixed23%negative

Owners praise its fast AI performance and generous VRAM, while immature software and difficult setup remain the main frustrations.

What owners dislike

  • Owners report gibberish output, repeated tokens and unfinished model support, mainly from Intel's vLLM and SYCL software stack.19
  • Owners say getting llama.cpp, vLLM or SYCL running on Linux takes many steps, custom builds and patches, and some failed to set it up.8
  • Owners report about 20 to 30 tokens per second on 27B models, slower than an RTX 3090 or 5070 Ti.7
  • Owners report prompt processing is slow, especially with Vulkan, and long context can make the card nearly unusable.7
  • Owners report multi-GPU setups are unreliable, with poor scaling, failed pooling of memory and high SYCL overhead.4

Points mentioned by at least 3 owners, most mentioned first.

Loading category ranking...

Graphics cards model ranking

Ranked #503 of 2,260 models in Graphics cards (Overall score)

Technical Specifications of graphics card MAXSUN Arc Pro B70 Turbo 32GB

Technical score
Technical score
8.1/ 10
✕
What it is
How good the specs are compared with the other models in this category, 1–10.
How we count it
Areas: We rate the specs in each area against the other models in this category.
Weighting: The areas that matter most to buyers count more. The shares are shown under Score components.
Share: The technical score is 40% of the overall score.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 71% of models
Score components:

44%

7.9

Performance

24%

8.7

Memory

12%

7.3

Power

11%

8.1

Features

5%

8.6

Design

4%

8.4

Connectivity

8.1
Reviews score
7.6
List score
?
Value for money
Value for money
8.2/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the graphics card's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a graphics card that offers a strong balance of performance, features, and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
★ Better than 99% of models
Score components:

70%

7.7

Overall score

30%

9.2

Price

8.2
3DMark Time Spy benchmark score
?
3DMark Port Royal score
?
PassMark (G3D) result
?
PassMark (DirectCompute) result
?
FP32 performance
?
Show more
VRAM
32 GB
Market range: <4 GB – >24 GB
This graphics card has 32 GB of VRAM, which is more than 96.6% of graphics cards and equal to 3.1% of graphics cards.
Memory type
?
Memory bus width
?
Maximum memory bandwidth
?
Effective memory speed
?
Show more
PCI Express (PCIe) version
?
PCIe lanes
?
DirectX version
?
Vulkan version
?
OpenGL version
?
Show more
Max displays supported
?
Max digital resolution
?
DisplayPort outputs
3
Market range: <1 – >3
This graphics card offers 3 DisplayPort outputs, which is more than 21.7% of graphics cards and equal to 76% of graphics cards.
DisplayPort version
?
DisplayPort link rates
?
Show more
Thermal Design Power (TDP)
?
Power consumption while under peak load
?
Recommended PSU wattage
?
Board power limit
?
PCIe power spec
?
Show more
Size
?
Length
267 mm
Market range: <200 mm – >350 mm
This graphics card is 267 mm long, which is shorter than 59.3% of graphics cards and equal in length to 3.5% of graphics cards.
Height
?
Slot width
2 slot/s
Market range: <2 slot/s – >3.25 slot/s
This graphics card occupies 2 slot/s, which is slimmer than 52.4% of graphics cards and equal in width to 43.4% of graphics cards.
Weight
?
Show more

MAXSUN Arc Pro B70 Turbo 32GB vs the average graphics card

246810TotalPerformanceMemoryFeaturesConnectivityPowerDesign
  • 20 GB more VRAM
    This graphics card has more VRAM than the average graphics card (32 GB vs 12 GB). The average graphics card has 12 GB VRAM.
    32 GB vs 12 GB
  • 0.5 slot/s slimmer design
    This graphics card occupies fewer slots than the average graphics card (2 slot/s vs 2.5 slot/s). The average graphics card occupies 2.5 slot/s.
    2 slot/s vs 2.5 slot/s
  • 10% better value for money
    MAXSUN Arc Pro B70 Turbo 32GB has better value for money than the average graphics card (8.16 vs 7.4).
    8.16 vs 7.41
  • 2x cheaper
    MAXSUN Arc Pro B70 Turbo 32GB is cheaper than the average graphics card (£260 vs £520).
    £260 vs £520
  • 10% better value for money
    MAXSUN Arc Pro B70 Turbo 32GB has better value for money than the average graphics card (8.16 vs 7.4).
    8.16 vs 7.41
  • 2x cheaper
    MAXSUN Arc Pro B70 Turbo 32GB is cheaper than the average graphics card (£260 vs £520).
    £260 vs £520
  • 20 GB more VRAM
    This graphics card has more VRAM than the average graphics card (32 GB vs 12 GB). The average graphics card has 12 GB VRAM.
    32 GB vs 12 GB
  • 0.5 slot/s slimmer design
    This graphics card occupies fewer slots than the average graphics card (2 slot/s vs 2.5 slot/s). The average graphics card occupies 2.5 slot/s.
    2 slot/s vs 2.5 slot/s
  • 2 fewer fans
    This graphics card has fewer fans than the average graphics card (1 vs 3).
    1 vs 3
  • No CUDA support
    This graphics card does not support CUDA, the average graphics card does.
  • No DLSS support
    This graphics card does not support DLSS, the average graphics card does.
  • 7.7% lower sentiment score
    7.2 vs 7.8
  • 7.7% lower sentiment score
    7.2 vs 7.8
  • No CUDA support
    This graphics card does not support CUDA, the average graphics card does.
  • No DLSS support
    This graphics card does not support DLSS, the average graphics card does.
  • 2 fewer fans
    This graphics card has fewer fans than the average graphics card (1 vs 3).
    1 vs 3

Third-party reviews

What customers like about MAXSUN Arc Pro B70 Turbo 32GB

  • 32 GB of VRAM is plenty for large models and data sets.
  • A backplate adds rigidity to the card.
  • Variable refresh rate keeps motion smooth on compatible screens.
  • Three DisplayPort outputs let you run several monitors.
  • At 267 mm it fits many standard cases.
  • Overclocking is supported for those who like to tune their card.

What customers don't like about MAXSUN Arc Pro B70 Turbo 32GB

  • Its single fan is the main cooling limit.
  • No CUDA support means CUDA-only software will not run.
  • No DLSS means games rely on FSR for upscaling.
  • No SR-IOV or vGPU support limits sharing the card between virtual machines.
  • No NVLink or bridge means two cards cannot be linked.

Verdict

Large models and big data sets need room, and the MAXSUN Arc Pro B70 Turbo 32GB carries 32 GB of VRAM for them. It is a budget card for people who work with large files and do not depend on CUDA, the Nvidia software that many programs need. It has a backplate, a custom PCB and a 267 mm length, so it suits a standard case. Three DisplayPort outputs and one HDMI port cover several screens, and variable refresh rate keeps motion smooth. The trade-off is cooling: it has one fan to move heat. It has no DLSS, only FSR for upscaling. It suits a buyer who edits video, runs local AI tools or handles large projects and wants plenty of memory.

Compare MAXSUN Arc Pro B70 Turbo 32GB with other products in the Graphics cards category

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of MAXSUN Arc Pro B70 Turbo 32GB and other products in the Graphics cards category

No results found