Scored using Graphics cards Methodology v1.0
Graphics cards Methodology v1.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontum Graphics cards Methodology v1.0: technical specifications plus authentic consumer ratings, with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Graphics cards Methodology v1.0

ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3060 OC Review | 118 Data compared

Avg. price:~£380VRAM:12 GBMemory bus width:192 bitThermal Design Power (TDP):170 W

ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3060 OC Review: Compare 118 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Graphics cards category and whether it is worth buying.

ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3060 OC
6.4/10

Overall score

Score
6.4/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the graphics card's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best graphics cards on the market.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

90%

6.1

Technical score

10%

9.3

User score

▼Worse than 66% of graphics cards
7.1

Value for money

Value for money
7.1/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the graphics card's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a graphics card that offers a strong balance of performance, features, and price.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

6.4

Overall score

30%

8.5

Price

▼Worse than 58%
6.1

Technical score

Technical score
6.1/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Graphics cards category across these key areas: Performance, Memory, Platform & Features, Connectivity & Media, Power & Cooling, Design.
When it matters
When you want to compare graphics cards based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

44%

4.2

Performance

24%

5.8

Memory

12%

8.4

Power & Cooling

11%

9.5

Platform & Features

5%

9.5

Design

4%

9.2

Connectivity & Media

▼Worse than 70%
9.3

User score

User score
9.3/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the graphics card.
When it matters
When you want to understand how a graphics card performs in real use and how reliable it is in terms of performance, temperatures, noise, stability, and long-term ownership.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

9.4

User ratings

30%

9.0

Number of reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
★Better than 91%
  • asus-dual-geforce-rtx-3060-oc
  • asus-dual-geforce-rtx-3060-oc
  • asus-dual-geforce-rtx-3060-oc
  • asus-dual-geforce-rtx-3060-oc
  • asus-dual-geforce-rtx-3060-oc
  • asus-dual-geforce-rtx-3060-oc
  • asus-dual-geforce-rtx-3060-oc
  • asus-dual-geforce-rtx-3060-oc
  • asus-dual-geforce-rtx-3060-oc
  • asus-dual-geforce-rtx-3060-oc
  • asus-dual-geforce-rtx-3060-oc
  • asus-dual-geforce-rtx-3060-oc
  • asus-dual-geforce-rtx-3060-oc
  • asus-dual-geforce-rtx-3060-oc
  • asus-dual-geforce-rtx-3060-oc
  • asus-dual-geforce-rtx-3060-oc
  • asus-dual-geforce-rtx-3060-oc
asus-dual-geforce-rtx-3060-oc
asus-dual-geforce-rtx-3060-oc
asus-dual-geforce-rtx-3060-oc
asus-dual-geforce-rtx-3060-oc
asus-dual-geforce-rtx-3060-oc
asus-dual-geforce-rtx-3060-oc
asus-dual-geforce-rtx-3060-oc
asus-dual-geforce-rtx-3060-oc
asus-dual-geforce-rtx-3060-oc
asus-dual-geforce-rtx-3060-oc
asus-dual-geforce-rtx-3060-oc
asus-dual-geforce-rtx-3060-oc
asus-dual-geforce-rtx-3060-oc
asus-dual-geforce-rtx-3060-oc
asus-dual-geforce-rtx-3060-oc
asus-dual-geforce-rtx-3060-oc
asus-dual-geforce-rtx-3060-oc
Best prices
*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
Loading...
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of graphics card ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3060 OC

Technical score
Technical score
6.1/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Graphics cards category across these key areas: Performance, Memory, Platform & Features, Connectivity & Media, Power & Cooling, Design.
When it matters
When you want to compare graphics cards based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

44%

4.2

Performance

24%

5.8

Memory

12%

8.4

Power & Cooling

11%

9.5

Platform & Features

5%

9.5

Design

4%

9.2

Connectivity & Media

6.1
User score
User score
9.3/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the graphics card.
When it matters
When you want to understand how a graphics card performs in real use and how reliable it is in terms of performance, temperatures, noise, stability, and long-term ownership.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

9.4

User ratings

30%

9.0

Number of reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
9.3
Popularity
Popularity
9.0/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the graphics card.
When it matters
When you prefer a graphics card that has already been chosen and reviewed by many other users.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Popularity:
ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3060 OC has a popularity score of 9 points, which is higher than that of 84.2% of products in this category.
9.0
Value for money
Value for money
7.1/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the graphics card's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a graphics card that offers a strong balance of performance, features, and price.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

70%

6.4

Overall score

30%

8.5

Price

7.1
3DMark Time Spy benchmark score
8,853 points
This graphics card scores 8,853 points in 3DMark Time Spy, which is lower than 74.7% of graphics cards and equal to 0.3% of graphics cards.
3DMark Port Royal score
8,850 points
This graphics card scores 8,850 points in 3DMark Port Royal, which is lower than 51.4% of graphics cards and equal to 0.1% of graphics cards.
PassMark (G3D) result
17,064 points
This graphics card scores 17,064 points in PassMark G3D, which is lower than 68.9% of graphics cards and equal to 0.1% of graphics cards.
PassMark (DirectCompute) result
8,152 points
This graphics card scores 8,152 points in PassMark DirectCompute, which is lower than 70.8% of graphics cards and equal to 0.4% of graphics cards.
Floating-point performance
13.17 TFLOPS
This graphics card delivers 13.17 TFLOPS floating-point performance, which is lower than that of 69.1% of graphics cards and equal to that of 1% of graphics cards.
Show more
VRAM
12 GB
This graphics card has 12 GB of VRAM, which is more than 45.5% of graphics cards and equal to 16% of graphics cards.
Memory type
GDDR6
GDDR version
GDDR6
This graphics card uses GDDR6 memory, which is newer than on 15.9% of graphics cards and equal to 40.3% of graphics cards.
Memory bus width
192 bit
This graphics card uses a 192 bit memory bus, which is narrower than that of 50.3% of graphics cards and equal to that of 18.8% of graphics cards.
Maximum memory bandwidth
360 GB/s
This graphics card reaches 360 GB/s memory bandwidth, which is lower than that of 62% of graphics cards and equal to that of 1.5% of graphics cards.
Show more
PCI Express (PCIe) version
4
This graphics card supports PCIe 4, which is newer than on 22.3% of graphics cards and equal to 52.1% of graphics cards.
PCIe lanes
x16
This graphics card uses x16 PCIe lanes, which is more than 23.4% of graphics cards and equal to 76.6% of graphics cards.
DirectX version
12 Ultimate
This graphics card supports DirectX 12 Ultimate, which is more advanced than on 22.6% of graphics cards and equal to 77.4% of graphics cards.
Vulkan version
1.4
This graphics card supports Vulkan 1.4, which is more advanced than on 20.7% of graphics cards and equal to 79.3% of graphics cards.
OpenGL version
4.6
This graphics card supports OpenGL 4.6, which is more advanced than on 1.9% of graphics cards and equal to 98.1% of graphics cards.
Show more
Max displays supported
4
This graphics card supports up to 4 displays, which is more than 8.3% of graphics cards and equal to 88.9% of graphics cards.
Max digital resolution
7680x4320
This graphics card supports a maximum digital resolution of 7680x4320, which is higher than that of 9% of graphics cards and equal to that of 91% of graphics cards.
DisplayPort outputs
3
This graphics card offers 3 DisplayPort outputs, which is more than 21% of graphics cards and equal to 76.8% of graphics cards.
DisplayPort version
1.4a
This graphics card supports DisplayPort 1.4a, which is more advanced than on 19.5% of graphics cards and equal to 47.1% of graphics cards.
DisplayPort link rates
8.1 Gbps
This graphics card supports DisplayPort link rates up to 8.1 Gbps, which is slower than on 65% of graphics cards and equal to 22.7% of graphics cards.
Show more
Thermal Design Power (TDP)
170 W
This graphics card has a TDP of 170 W, which is lower than that of 63.4% of graphics cards and equal to that of 1.9% of graphics cards.
Power consumption while under peak load
170 W
This graphics card draws 170 W under peak load, which is lower than 66.4% of graphics cards and equal to 1.6% of graphics cards.
Recommended PSU wattage
650 W
This graphics card recommends a 650 W PSU, which is lower than that of 40.3% of graphics cards and equal to that of 13.9% of graphics cards.
Board power limit
187 W
This graphics card has a board power limit of 187 W, which is lower than that of 60% of graphics cards and equal to that of 0.3% of graphics cards.
PCIe power spec
170 W
Show more
Size
200x 123x 38 mm
This graphics card measures 200x123x 38 mm, which is more compact than 94.5% of graphics cards and equal in size to 0.5% of graphics cards.
Length
200 mm
This graphics card is 200 mm long, which is shorter than 89.9% of graphics cards and equal in length to 0.7% of graphics cards.
Height
123 mm
This graphics card is 123 mm tall, which is shorter than 55.3% of graphics cards and equal in height to 0.7% of graphics cards.
Slot width
2 slot/s
This graphics card occupies 2 slot/s, which is slimmer than 53.4% of graphics cards and equal in width to 42.5% of graphics cards.
Weight
541 g
This graphics card weighs 541 g, which is lighter than 90% of graphics cards and equal in weight to 0.1% of graphics cards.
Show more

ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3060 OC vs the average graphics card

246810TotalPerformanceMemoryPlatform & FeaturesConnectivity & MediaPower & CoolingDesign
  • Supports ECC memory
    This graphics card supports ECC memory, the average graphics card does not.
  • 85 mm shorter card length
    This graphics card is shorter than the average graphics card (200 mm vs 285 mm). The average graphics card has a length of 285 mm.
    200 mm vs 285 mm
  • 0.5 slot/s slimmer design
    This graphics card occupies fewer slots than the average graphics card (2 slot/s vs 2.5 slot/s). The average graphics card occupies 2.5 slot/s.
    2 slot/s vs 2.5 slot/s
  • More compact card size
    This graphics card is more compact than the average graphics card (200x123 x 38 mm vs 285x127 x 52 mm). The average graphics card has a size of 285x127 x 52 mm.
    200x123 x 38 mm vs 285x127 x 52 mm
  • 16% higher user score
    User score
    9.3/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the graphics card.
    When it matters
    When you want to understand how a graphics card performs in real use and how reliable it is in terms of performance, temperatures, noise, stability, and long-term ownership.
    Score distribution
    ▼
    ▼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3060 OC
    the average graphics card
    ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3060 OC has a higher user score than the average graphics card (9.28 vs 8.000).
    9.28 vs 8
  • 20.9% lower TDP
    This graphics card has a lower TDP than the average graphics card (170 W vs 215 W). The average graphics card has a TDP of 215 W.
    170 W vs 215 W
  • Includes LHR limiter
    This graphics card includes an LHR limiter, the average graphics card does not.
  • 7.1% faster VRAM clock
    This graphics card has a higher VRAM clock than the average graphics card (1875 MHz vs 1750 MHz). The average graphics card runs its VRAM at 1750 MHz.
    1,875 MHz vs 1,750 MHz
  • 16% higher user score
    User score
    9.3/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the graphics card.
    When it matters
    When you want to understand how a graphics card performs in real use and how reliable it is in terms of performance, temperatures, noise, stability, and long-term ownership.
    Score distribution
    ▼
    ▼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3060 OC
    the average graphics card
    ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3060 OC has a higher user score than the average graphics card (9.28 vs 8.000).
    9.28 vs 8
  • 2.14x more popular
    ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3060 OC is more popular than the average graphics card (9 vs 4.2).
    9 vs 4.22
  • Supports ECC memory
    This graphics card supports ECC memory, the average graphics card does not.
  • 7.1% faster VRAM clock
    This graphics card has a higher VRAM clock than the average graphics card (1875 MHz vs 1750 MHz). The average graphics card runs its VRAM at 1750 MHz.
    1,875 MHz vs 1,750 MHz
  • 8x more Infinity Cache
    This graphics card has more Infinity Cache than the average graphics card (32 MB vs 4 MB). The average graphics card has 4 MB Infinity Cache.
    32 MB vs 4 MB
  • Includes LHR limiter
    This graphics card includes an LHR limiter, the average graphics card does not.
  • 20.9% lower TDP
    This graphics card has a lower TDP than the average graphics card (170 W vs 215 W). The average graphics card has a TDP of 215 W.
    170 W vs 215 W
  • 85 mm shorter card length
    This graphics card is shorter than the average graphics card (200 mm vs 285 mm). The average graphics card has a length of 285 mm.
    200 mm vs 285 mm
  • 0.5 slot/s slimmer design
    This graphics card occupies fewer slots than the average graphics card (2 slot/s vs 2.5 slot/s). The average graphics card occupies 2.5 slot/s.
    2 slot/s vs 2.5 slot/s
  • More compact card size
    This graphics card is more compact than the average graphics card (200x123 x 38 mm vs 285x127 x 52 mm). The average graphics card has a size of 285x127 x 52 mm.
    200x123 x 38 mm vs 285x127 x 52 mm
  • 47% lighter card weight
    This graphics card is lighter than the average graphics card (541 g vs 1021 g). The average graphics card weighs 1021 g.
    541 g vs 1,021 g
  • 25.5% lower boost clock speed
    This graphics card has a lower boost GPU clock than the average graphics card (1867 MHz vs 2505 MHz). The average graphics card has a boost GPU clock of 2505 MHz.
    1,867 MHz vs 2,505 MHz
  • 64 bit narrower memory bus
    This graphics card has a narrower memory bus than the average graphics card (192 bit vs 256 bit). The average graphics card has a memory bus width of 256 bit.
    192 bit vs 256 bit
  • 1 fewer fans
    This graphics card has fewer fans than the average graphics card (2 vs 3).
    2 vs 3
  • 31.3% lower base clock speed
    This graphics card has a lower base GPU clock than the average graphics card (1320 MHz vs 1920 MHz). The average graphics card has a base GPU clock of 1920 MHz.
    1,320 MHz vs 1,920 MHz
  • 12 fewer compute units
    This graphics card has fewer compute units than the average graphics card (28 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 compute units.
    28 vs 40
  • 60% larger process node
    This graphics card has a higher process node than the average graphics card (8 nm vs 5 nm). The average graphics card uses a process node of 5 nm.
    8 nm vs 5 nm
  • 72 fewer TMUs
    This graphics card has fewer TMUs than the average graphics card (112 vs 184). The average graphics card has 184 TMUs.
    112 vs 184
  • 46% lower texture rate
    This graphics card has a lower texture rate than the average graphics card (205.7 GTexel/s vs 381.2 GTexel/s). The average graphics card has a texture rate of 381.2 GTexel/s.
    205.7 GTexel/s vs 381.2 GTexel/s
  • 25.5% lower boost clock speed
    This graphics card has a lower boost GPU clock than the average graphics card (1867 MHz vs 2505 MHz). The average graphics card has a boost GPU clock of 2505 MHz.
    1,867 MHz vs 2,505 MHz
  • 31.3% lower base clock speed
    This graphics card has a lower base GPU clock than the average graphics card (1320 MHz vs 1920 MHz). The average graphics card has a base GPU clock of 1920 MHz.
    1,320 MHz vs 1,920 MHz
  • 12 fewer compute units
    This graphics card has fewer compute units than the average graphics card (28 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 compute units.
    28 vs 40
  • 72 fewer TMUs
    This graphics card has fewer TMUs than the average graphics card (112 vs 184). The average graphics card has 184 TMUs.
    112 vs 184
  • 46% lower texture rate
    This graphics card has a lower texture rate than the average graphics card (205.7 GTexel/s vs 381.2 GTexel/s). The average graphics card has a texture rate of 381.2 GTexel/s.
    205.7 GTexel/s vs 381.2 GTexel/s
  • 12 fewer ray tracing cores
    This graphics card has fewer ray tracing cores than the average graphics card (28 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 ray tracing cores.
    28 vs 40
  • 46% lower pixel rate
    This graphics card has a lower pixel rate than the average graphics card (88.2 GPixel/s vs 163.2 GPixel/s). The average graphics card has a pixel rate of 163.2 GPixel/s.
    88.18 GPixel/s vs 163.2 GPixel/s
  • 16 fewer ROPs
    This graphics card has fewer ROPs than the average graphics card (48 vs 64). The average graphics card has 64 ROPs.
    48 vs 64
  • 40.7% lower FP32 performance
    This graphics card has a lower FP32 performance than the average graphics card (13.4 TFLOPS vs 22.57 TFLOPS). The average graphics card has FP32 performance of 22.57 TFLOPS.
    13.38 TFLOPS vs 22.57 TFLOPS
  • 32 fewer AI cores
    This graphics card has fewer AI cores than the average graphics card (112 vs 144). The average graphics card has 144 AI cores.
    112 vs 144
  • 39.7% lower gaming score
    This graphics card has a lower gaming score than the average graphics card (8853 points vs 14678.5 points). The average graphics card has a gaming score of 14678.5 points.
    8,853 points vs 14,678.5 points
  • 24.7% lower PassMark score
    This graphics card has a lower PassMark score than the average graphics card (17064 points vs 22653 points). The average graphics card has a PassMark score of 22653 points.
    17,064 points vs 22,653 points
  • 55.7% lower FP16 performance
    This graphics card has a lower FP16 performance than the average graphics card (13.2 TFLOPS vs 29.7 TFLOPS). The average graphics card has FP16 performance of 29.725 TFLOPS.
    13.17 TFLOPS vs 29.725 TFLOPS
  • 58.3% lower FP64 performance
    This graphics card has a lower FP64 performance than the average graphics card (0.2 TFLOPS vs 0.48 TFLOPS). The average graphics card has FP64 performance of 0.48 TFLOPS.
    0.2 TFLOPS vs 0.48 TFLOPS
  • 64 bit narrower memory bus
    This graphics card has a narrower memory bus than the average graphics card (192 bit vs 256 bit). The average graphics card has a memory bus width of 256 bit.
    192 bit vs 256 bit
  • 21.1% slower memory speed
    This graphics card has a lower effective memory speed than the average graphics card (15000 MHz vs 19000 MHz). The average graphics card reaches an effective memory speed of 19000 MHz.
    15,000 MHz vs 19,000 MHz
  • 87.5% smaller L2 cache
    This graphics card has fewer L2 cache than the average graphics card (3 MB vs 24 MB). The average graphics card has 24 MB L2 cache.
    3 MB vs 24 MB
  • 19.6% lower memory bandwidth
    This graphics card has a lower memory bandwidth than the average graphics card (360 GB/s vs 448 GB/s). The average graphics card has a memory bandwidth of 448 GB/s.
    360 GB/s vs 448 GB/s
  • 60% larger process node
    This graphics card has a higher process node than the average graphics card (8 nm vs 5 nm). The average graphics card uses a process node of 5 nm.
    8 nm vs 5 nm
  • 2 older
    This graphics card was released earlier than the average graphics card (2021 vs 2023).
    February 2021
    2,021 vs 2,023
  • Older encoder generation
    This graphics card uses an older encoder generation than the average graphics card (7 vs 8). The average graphics card uses encoder generation 8.
    7 vs 8
  • 47.6% fewer transistors
    This graphics card has fewer transistors than the average graphics card (12000 million vs 22900 million). The average graphics card has 22900 million transistors.
    12,000 million vs 22,900 million
  • No AV1 encoding
    This graphics card does not support AV1 encoding, the average graphics card does.
    No vs yes
  • 2 fewer monitors per output type
    This graphics card supports fewer monitors per output type than the average graphics card (1 vs 3). The average graphics card supports 3 monitors per output type.
    1 vs 3
  • Older NVDEC generation
    This graphics card has a lower NVDEC generation than the average graphics card (5 vs 6). The average graphics card offers NVDEC generation 6.
    5 vs 6
  • 1 fewer fans
    This graphics card has fewer fans than the average graphics card (2 vs 3).
    2 vs 3
  • 6 °C higher load temperature
    This graphics card has a higher load temperature than the average graphics card (73 °C vs 67 °C). The average graphics card has a load temperature of 67 °C.
    73 °C vs 67 °C

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

P
peterviola.com
12/01/2025
Summary of the review
V
vividrepairs.co.uk
30/11/2025
Summary of the review

Third-party reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
Reviews last updated: June 2026 · How we calculate this

What we like about ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3060 OC

  • Generous 12GB VRAM buffer provides better longevity than 8GB models
  • Excellent thermal performance with effective cooling and quiet operation
  • Compact 20cm dual-slot design fits easily into small-form-factor builds
  • High-quality build featuring a metal backplate and stainless steel bracket
  • Solid 1080p and capable 1440p gaming performance for mainstream titles
  • Quiet 0dB technology that stops fans when the temperature is below 50°C

What we don't like about ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3060 OC

  • Ray tracing performance can cause significant frame rate drops in AAA games
  • Pricing can sometimes be poor compared to more powerful alternatives like the RX 6700 XT
  • Performance is insufficient for consistent 4K gaming without major settings compromises
  • Lacks extensive RGB lighting which may disappoint some enthusiasts
  • Performance gains over previous generations (like 2060 Super) can be relatively minor

Verdict

The Asus Dual GeForce RTX 3060 OC is a compact, 20cm long graphics card based on the NVIDIA Ampere architecture, featuring 3,584 CUDA cores and an overclocked boost clock of up to 1,867 MHz. It is equipped with 12GB of GDDR6 VRAM on a 192-bit interface, delivering solid 1080p and 1440p gaming performance with support for Ray Tracing and DLSS. Its main pros include an efficient Axial-tech dual-fan cooling system, 0dB silent operation at low temperatures, and broad compatibility with smaller builds due to its dual-slot design. However, its cons include limited RGB lighting and a performance profile that struggles with smooth 4K gameplay in demanding titles without significant setting adjustments.

Compare ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3060 OC with other products in the Graphics cards category

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3060 OC and other products in the Graphics cards category

No results found