OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS
Scored using Graphics cards Methodology v1.0
Graphics cards Methodology v1.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontum Graphics cards Methodology v1.0: technical specifications plus authentic consumer ratings, with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Graphics cards Methodology v1.0

ZOTAC Gaming GeForce RTX 4060 Ti Twin Edge 8GB Review | 118 Data compared

Avg. price:~£380VRAM:8 GBMemory bus width:128 bitThermal Design Power (TDP):160 W

ZOTAC Gaming GeForce RTX 4060 Ti Twin Edge 8GB Review: Compare 118 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Graphics cards category and whether it is worth buying.

ZOTAC Gaming GeForce RTX 4060 Ti Twin Edge 8GB
6.8/10

Overall score

Score
6.8/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the graphics card's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best graphics cards on the market.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 57% of models
Score components

90%

6.6

Technical score

10%

8.9

User score

â–¼Worse than 57% of graphics cards
7.3

Value for money

Value for money
7.3/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the graphics card's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a graphics card that offers a strong balance of performance, features, and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 53% of models
Score components

70%

6.8

Overall score

30%

8.5

Price

â–²Better than 53%
6.6

Technical score

Technical score
6.6/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Graphics cards category across these key areas: Performance, Memory, Platform & Features, Connectivity & Media, Power & Cooling, Design.
When it matters
When you want to compare graphics cards based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 61% of models
Score components

44%

6.0

Performance

24%

4.2

Memory

12%

8.6

Power & Cooling

11%

9.6

Platform & Features

5%

9.2

Design

4%

9.6

Connectivity & Media

â–¼Worse than 61%
8.9

User score

User score
8.9/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the graphics card.
When it matters
When you want to understand how a graphics card performs in real use and how reliable it is in terms of performance, temperatures, noise, stability, and long-term ownership.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 82% of models
Score components

70%

9.1

User ratings

30%

8.4

Number of reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
â–²Better than 82%
  • zotac-gaming-geforce-rtx-4060-ti-twin-edge-8gb
  • zotac-gaming-geforce-rtx-4060-ti-twin-edge-8gb
  • zotac-gaming-geforce-rtx-4060-ti-twin-edge-8gb
  • zotac-gaming-geforce-rtx-4060-ti-twin-edge-8gb
  • zotac-gaming-geforce-rtx-4060-ti-twin-edge-8gb
  • zotac-gaming-geforce-rtx-4060-ti-twin-edge-8gb
  • zotac-gaming-geforce-rtx-4060-ti-twin-edge-8gb
  • zotac-gaming-geforce-rtx-4060-ti-twin-edge-8gb
zotac-gaming-geforce-rtx-4060-ti-twin-edge-8gb
zotac-gaming-geforce-rtx-4060-ti-twin-edge-8gb
zotac-gaming-geforce-rtx-4060-ti-twin-edge-8gb
zotac-gaming-geforce-rtx-4060-ti-twin-edge-8gb
zotac-gaming-geforce-rtx-4060-ti-twin-edge-8gb
zotac-gaming-geforce-rtx-4060-ti-twin-edge-8gb
zotac-gaming-geforce-rtx-4060-ti-twin-edge-8gb
zotac-gaming-geforce-rtx-4060-ti-twin-edge-8gb
Best prices
*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
Best rankings
Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Loading category ranking...

Graphics cards model ranking

Ranked #702 of 2,195 models in Graphics cards (Overall score)

Technical Specifications of graphics card ZOTAC Gaming GeForce RTX 4060 Ti Twin Edge 8GB

Technical score
Technical score
6.6/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Graphics cards category across these key areas: Performance, Memory, Platform & Features, Connectivity & Media, Power & Cooling, Design.
When it matters
When you want to compare graphics cards based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 61% of models
Score components:

44%

6.0

Performance

24%

4.2

Memory

12%

8.6

Power & Cooling

11%

9.6

Platform & Features

5%

9.2

Design

4%

9.6

Connectivity & Media

6.6
User score
User score
8.9/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the graphics card.
When it matters
When you want to understand how a graphics card performs in real use and how reliable it is in terms of performance, temperatures, noise, stability, and long-term ownership.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 82% of models
Score components

70%

9.1

User ratings

30%

8.4

Number of reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
8.9
Popularity
Popularity
8.4/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the graphics card.
When it matters
When you prefer a graphics card that has already been chosen and reviewed by many other users.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 78% of models
Popularity:
ZOTAC Gaming GeForce RTX 4060 Ti Twin Edge 8GB has a popularity score of 8.4 points, which is higher than that of 78.1% of products in this category.
8.4
Value for money
Value for money
7.3/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the graphics card's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a graphics card that offers a strong balance of performance, features, and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 53% of models
Score components:

70%

6.8

Overall score

30%

8.5

Price

7.3
3DMark Time Spy benchmark score
12,000 points
Market range: <4k points – >34k points
This graphics card scores 12,000 points in 3DMark Time Spy, which is lower than 61.4% of graphics cards and equal to 0.5% of graphics cards.
3DMark Port Royal score
7,919 points
Market range: <0 points – >25k points
This graphics card scores 7,919 points in 3DMark Port Royal, which is lower than 59.9% of graphics cards.
PassMark (G3D) result
22,638 points
Market range: <7.7k points – >36k points
This graphics card scores 22,638 points in PassMark G3D, which is lower than 50.5% of graphics cards and equal to 1.3% of graphics cards.
PassMark (DirectCompute) result
12,074 points
Market range: <3.1k points – >26.3k points
This graphics card scores 12,074 points in PassMark DirectCompute, which is higher than 49.4% of graphics cards and equal to 0.8% of graphics cards.
Floating-point performance
22.06 TFLOPS
Market range: <4.38 TFLOPS – >57.42 TFLOPS
This graphics card delivers 22.06 TFLOPS floating-point performance, which is lower than that of 53.6% of graphics cards and equal to that of 1.3% of graphics cards.
Show more
VRAM
8 GB
Market range: <4 GB – >24 GB
This graphics card has 8 GB of VRAM, which is less than 57.5% of graphics cards and equal to 25.1% of graphics cards.
Memory type
GDDR6
GDDR version
GDDR6
This graphics card uses GDDR6 memory, which is newer than on 15.9% of graphics cards and equal to 40.3% of graphics cards.
Memory bus width
128 bit
Market range: <64 bit – >384 bit
This graphics card uses a 128 bit memory bus, which is narrower than that of 69.6% of graphics cards and equal to that of 26% of graphics cards.
Maximum memory bandwidth
288 GB/s
Market range: <168 GB/s – >960 GB/s
This graphics card reaches 288 GB/s memory bandwidth, which is lower than that of 69.7% of graphics cards and equal to that of 6.8% of graphics cards.
Show more
PCI Express (PCIe) version
4
This graphics card supports PCIe 4, which is newer than on 22.3% of graphics cards and equal to 52.1% of graphics cards.
PCIe lanes
x8
This graphics card uses x8 PCIe lanes, which is fewer than 76.7% of graphics cards and equal to 22.2% of graphics cards.
DirectX version
12 Ultimate
This graphics card supports DirectX 12 Ultimate, which is more advanced than on 22.6% of graphics cards and equal to 77.4% of graphics cards.
Vulkan version
1.4
This graphics card supports Vulkan 1.4, which is more advanced than on 20.7% of graphics cards and equal to 79.3% of graphics cards.
OpenGL version
4.6
This graphics card supports OpenGL 4.6, which is more advanced than on 1.9% of graphics cards and equal to 98.1% of graphics cards.
Show more
Max displays supported
4
Market range: <4 – >4
This graphics card supports up to 4 displays, which is more than 8.3% of graphics cards and equal to 88.9% of graphics cards.
Max digital resolution
7680x4320
This graphics card supports a maximum digital resolution of 7680x4320, which is higher than that of 9% of graphics cards and equal to that of 91% of graphics cards.
DisplayPort outputs
3
Market range: <1 – >3
This graphics card offers 3 DisplayPort outputs, which is more than 21% of graphics cards and equal to 76.8% of graphics cards.
DisplayPort version
1.4a
This graphics card supports DisplayPort 1.4a, which is more advanced than on 19.5% of graphics cards and equal to 47.1% of graphics cards.
DisplayPort link rates
32.4 Gbps
Market range: <5.4 Gbps – >80 Gbps
This graphics card supports DisplayPort link rates up to 32.4 Gbps, which is faster than on 57.6% of graphics cards and equal to 21.5% of graphics cards.
Show more
Thermal Design Power (TDP)
160 W
Market range: <60 W – >360 W
This graphics card has a TDP of 160 W, which is lower than that of 68% of graphics cards and equal to that of 4.8% of graphics cards.
Power consumption while under peak load
160 W
Market range: <100 W – >400 W
This graphics card draws 160 W under peak load, which is lower than 71.2% of graphics cards and equal to 3.8% of graphics cards.
Recommended PSU wattage
500 W
Market range: <450 W – >850 W
This graphics card recommends a 500 W PSU, which is lower than that of 75.6% of graphics cards and equal to that of 8.9% of graphics cards.
Board power limit
187 W
Market range: <100 W – >400 W
This graphics card has a board power limit of 187 W, which is lower than that of 60% of graphics cards and equal to that of 0.3% of graphics cards.
PCIe power spec
160 W
Show more
Size
225.5x 123.2x 40.1 mm
This graphics card measures 225.5x123.2x 40.1 mm, which is more compact than 88.4% of graphics cards and equal in size to 0.6% of graphics cards.
Length
225.5 mm
Market range: <200 mm – >350 mm
This graphics card is 225.5 mm long, which is shorter than 84.1% of graphics cards and equal in length to 0.3% of graphics cards.
Height
123.2 mm
Market range: <109 mm – >146 mm
This graphics card is 123.2 mm tall, which is shorter than 54.8% of graphics cards and equal in height to 0.5% of graphics cards.
Slot width
2.2 slot/s
Market range: <2 slot/s – >3.25 slot/s
This graphics card occupies 2.2 slot/s, which is slimmer than 51.8% of graphics cards and equal in width to 1.1% of graphics cards.
Weight
1,000 g
Market range: <500 g – >2k g
This graphics card weighs 1,000 g, which is lighter than 51.5% of graphics cards and equal in weight to 3.1% of graphics cards.
Show more

ZOTAC Gaming GeForce RTX 4060 Ti Twin Edge 8GB vs the average graphics card

246810TotalPerformanceMemoryPlatform & FeaturesConnectivity & MediaPower & CoolingDesign
  • 20.3% higher base clock speed
    This graphics card has a higher base GPU clock than the average graphics card (2310 MHz vs 1920 MHz). The average graphics card has a base GPU clock of 1920 MHz.
    2,310 MHz vs 1,920 MHz
  • 28.6% faster VRAM clock
    This graphics card has a higher VRAM clock than the average graphics card (2250 MHz vs 1750 MHz). The average graphics card runs its VRAM at 1750 MHz.
    2,250 MHz vs 1,750 MHz
  • 59.5 mm shorter card length
    This graphics card is shorter than the average graphics card (225.5 mm vs 285 mm). The average graphics card has a length of 285 mm.
    225.5 mm vs 285 mm
  • 23.1% lower PSU requirement
    This graphics card has a lower PSU requirement than the average graphics card (500 W vs 650 W). The average graphics card has a PSU requirement of 650 W.
    500 W vs 650 W
  • 25.6% lower TDP
    This graphics card has a lower TDP than the average graphics card (160 W vs 215 W). The average graphics card has a TDP of 215 W.
    160 W vs 215 W
  • More compact card size
    This graphics card is more compact than the average graphics card (225.5x123.2 x 40.1 mm vs 285x127 x 52 mm). The average graphics card has a size of 285x127 x 52 mm.
    225.5x123.2 x 40.1 mm vs 285x127 x 52 mm
  • 1.2% higher boost clock speed
    This graphics card has a higher boost GPU clock than the average graphics card (2535 MHz vs 2505 MHz). The average graphics card has a boost GPU clock of 2505 MHz.
    2,535 MHz vs 2,505 MHz
  • 11.5% higher user score
    User score
    8.9/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the graphics card.
    When it matters
    When you want to understand how a graphics card performs in real use and how reliable it is in terms of performance, temperatures, noise, stability, and long-term ownership.
    Score distribution
    â–¼
    â–¼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    ZOTAC Gaming GeForce RTX 4060 Ti Twin Edge 8GB
    the average graphics card
    ZOTAC Gaming GeForce RTX 4060 Ti Twin Edge 8GB has a higher user score than the average graphics card (8.92 vs 8.000).
    8.92 vs 8
  • 11.5% higher user score
    User score
    8.9/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the graphics card.
    When it matters
    When you want to understand how a graphics card performs in real use and how reliable it is in terms of performance, temperatures, noise, stability, and long-term ownership.
    Score distribution
    â–¼
    â–¼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    ZOTAC Gaming GeForce RTX 4060 Ti Twin Edge 8GB
    the average graphics card
    ZOTAC Gaming GeForce RTX 4060 Ti Twin Edge 8GB has a higher user score than the average graphics card (8.92 vs 8.000).
    8.92 vs 8
  • 20.3% higher base clock speed
    This graphics card has a higher base GPU clock than the average graphics card (2310 MHz vs 1920 MHz). The average graphics card has a base GPU clock of 1920 MHz.
    2,310 MHz vs 1,920 MHz
  • 1.2% higher boost clock speed
    This graphics card has a higher boost GPU clock than the average graphics card (2535 MHz vs 2505 MHz). The average graphics card has a boost GPU clock of 2505 MHz.
    2,535 MHz vs 2,505 MHz
  • 28.6% faster VRAM clock
    This graphics card has a higher VRAM clock than the average graphics card (2250 MHz vs 1750 MHz). The average graphics card runs its VRAM at 1750 MHz.
    2,250 MHz vs 1,750 MHz
  • 8x more Infinity Cache
    This graphics card has more Infinity Cache than the average graphics card (32 MB vs 4 MB). The average graphics card has 4 MB Infinity Cache.
    32 MB vs 4 MB
  • Newer HDMI version
    This graphics card supports a newer HDMI version than the average graphics card (2.1a vs 2.1).
    2.1a vs 2.1
  • 4x higher HDMI bandwidth
    This graphics card has a higher HDMI bandwidth than the average graphics card (48 Gbps vs 12 Gbps). The average graphics card has HDMI bandwidth of 12 Gbps.
    48 Gbps vs 12 Gbps
  • 23.1% lower PSU requirement
    This graphics card has a lower PSU requirement than the average graphics card (500 W vs 650 W). The average graphics card has a PSU requirement of 650 W.
    500 W vs 650 W
  • 25.6% lower TDP
    This graphics card has a lower TDP than the average graphics card (160 W vs 215 W). The average graphics card has a TDP of 215 W.
    160 W vs 215 W
  • 59.5 mm shorter card length
    This graphics card is shorter than the average graphics card (225.5 mm vs 285 mm). The average graphics card has a length of 285 mm.
    225.5 mm vs 285 mm
  • More compact card size
    This graphics card is more compact than the average graphics card (225.5x123.2 x 40.1 mm vs 285x127 x 52 mm). The average graphics card has a size of 285x127 x 52 mm.
    225.5x123.2 x 40.1 mm vs 285x127 x 52 mm
  • 128 bit narrower memory bus
    This graphics card has a narrower memory bus than the average graphics card (128 bit vs 256 bit). The average graphics card has a memory bus width of 256 bit.
    128 bit vs 256 bit
  • 4 GB less VRAM
    This graphics card has fewer VRAM than the average graphics card (8 GB vs 12 GB). The average graphics card has 12 GB VRAM.
    8 GB vs 12 GB
  • 1 fewer fans
    This graphics card has fewer fans than the average graphics card (2 vs 3).
    2 vs 3
  • No dual BIOS
    This graphics card does not include dual BIOS, the average graphics card does.
  • Fewer PCIe lanes
    This graphics card has fewer PCIe lanes than the average graphics card (x8 vs x16). The average graphics card has x16 PCIe lanes.
    x8 vs x16
  • 35.7% lower memory bandwidth
    This graphics card has a lower memory bandwidth than the average graphics card (288 GB/s vs 448 GB/s). The average graphics card has a memory bandwidth of 448 GB/s.
    288 GB/s vs 448 GB/s
  • 48 fewer TMUs
    This graphics card has fewer TMUs than the average graphics card (136 vs 184). The average graphics card has 184 TMUs.
    136 vs 184
  • 16 fewer ROPs
    This graphics card has fewer ROPs than the average graphics card (48 vs 64). The average graphics card has 64 ROPs.
    48 vs 64
  • 48 fewer TMUs
    This graphics card has fewer TMUs than the average graphics card (136 vs 184). The average graphics card has 184 TMUs.
    136 vs 184
  • 16 fewer ROPs
    This graphics card has fewer ROPs than the average graphics card (48 vs 64). The average graphics card has 64 ROPs.
    48 vs 64
  • 6 fewer compute units
    This graphics card has fewer compute units than the average graphics card (34 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 compute units.
    34 vs 40
  • 25.4% lower pixel rate
    This graphics card has a lower pixel rate than the average graphics card (121.7 GPixel/s vs 163.2 GPixel/s). The average graphics card has a pixel rate of 163.2 GPixel/s.
    121.7 GPixel/s vs 163.2 GPixel/s
  • 14.9% lower texture rate
    This graphics card has a lower texture rate than the average graphics card (324.5 GTexel/s vs 381.2 GTexel/s). The average graphics card has a texture rate of 381.2 GTexel/s.
    324.5 GTexel/s vs 381.2 GTexel/s
  • 6 fewer ray tracing cores
    This graphics card has fewer ray tracing cores than the average graphics card (34 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 ray tracing cores.
    34 vs 40
  • 18.2% lower gaming score
    This graphics card has a lower gaming score than the average graphics card (12000 points vs 14678.5 points). The average graphics card has a gaming score of 14678.5 points.
    12,000 points vs 14,678.5 points
  • 13.6% lower ray tracing score
    This graphics card has a lower ray tracing score than the average graphics card (7919 points vs 9166 points). The average graphics card has a ray tracing score of 9166 points.
    7,919 points vs 9,166 points
  • 128 bit narrower memory bus
    This graphics card has a narrower memory bus than the average graphics card (128 bit vs 256 bit). The average graphics card has a memory bus width of 256 bit.
    128 bit vs 256 bit
  • 4 GB less VRAM
    This graphics card has fewer VRAM than the average graphics card (8 GB vs 12 GB). The average graphics card has 12 GB VRAM.
    8 GB vs 12 GB
  • 35.7% lower memory bandwidth
    This graphics card has a lower memory bandwidth than the average graphics card (288 GB/s vs 448 GB/s). The average graphics card has a memory bandwidth of 448 GB/s.
    288 GB/s vs 448 GB/s
  • 5.3% slower memory speed
    This graphics card has a lower effective memory speed than the average graphics card (18000 MHz vs 19000 MHz). The average graphics card reaches an effective memory speed of 19000 MHz.
    18,000 MHz vs 19,000 MHz
  • Fewer PCIe lanes
    This graphics card has fewer PCIe lanes than the average graphics card (x8 vs x16). The average graphics card has x16 PCIe lanes.
    x8 vs x16
  • Narrower decode codec support
    This graphics card supports narrower hardware decode codec support than the average graphics card (H.264/AV1/VP9 vs H.264/H.265/AV1/VP9/MPEG-2/VC-1).
    H.264/AV1/VP9 vs H.264/H.265/AV1/VP9/MPEG-2/VC-1
  • 2 fewer monitors per output type
    This graphics card supports fewer monitors per output type than the average graphics card (1 vs 3). The average graphics card supports 3 monitors per output type.
    1 vs 3
  • Older NVDEC generation
    This graphics card has a lower NVDEC generation than the average graphics card (5 vs 6). The average graphics card offers NVDEC generation 6.
    5 vs 6
  • 1 fewer fans
    This graphics card has fewer fans than the average graphics card (2 vs 3).
    2 vs 3
  • No dual BIOS
    This graphics card does not include dual BIOS, the average graphics card does.

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

W
windowscentral.com
30/05/2023
Summary of the review
Zotac GeForce RTX 4060 TiGo to product viewer dialogue for this item. review: How much do you care about DLSS 3 Frame Generation?
C
charlestech.fr
17/05/2024
Summary of the review
Test Zotac GeForce RTX 4060 Ti Twin Edge OC : Avis complet
(Translated)Show original

Third-party reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
Reviews last updated: June 2026 · How we calculate this

What we like about ZOTAC Gaming GeForce RTX 4060 Ti Twin Edge 8GB

  • Compact dual-slot design fits easily in Small Form Factor (SFF) and Mini-ITX cases
  • Excellent power efficiency with significantly lower power draw than previous generations
  • Support for modern features like DLSS 3 Frame Generation and AV1 encoding for streamers
  • Quiet operation and effective cooling for its power class
  • Zotac offers a 5-year extended warranty upon registration in certain regions
  • Strong performance for 1080p gaming in modern AAA titles

What we don't like about ZOTAC Gaming GeForce RTX 4060 Ti Twin Edge 8GB

  • Limited 8GB VRAM and 128-bit bus can cause performance drops at 1440p or 4K resolutions
  • Poor value proposition compared to previous generational leaps in performance
  • 8GB of memory is increasingly insufficient for some newer, VRAM-heavy game titles
  • Some users report the card can run hot in cases with poor airflow
  • Limited RGB lighting and basic software customization options compared to higher-end models

Verdict

The Zotac Gaming GeForce RTX 4060 Ti Twin Edge 8GB is a compact, mid-range graphics card powered by the NVIDIA Ada Lovelace architecture, featuring 4,352 CUDA cores and a boost clock speed of 2,535 MHz. It is equipped with 8GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus, delivering a bandwidth of 288 GB/s, and utilizes a dual-fan IceStorm 2.0 cooling system with FREEZE fan stop technology for silent operation at idle. Main characteristics include its small 2.2-slot form factor (225.5mm length) and high energy efficiency with a 160W maximum power draw, requiring only a single 8-pin PCIe power connector. Key pros include excellent 1080p and 1440p gaming performance, support for DLSS 3 Frame Generation for significantly boosted frame rates, and a metal backplate for structural durability. However, main cons involve its limited 8GB VRAM capacity which may bottleneck future AAA titles or high-resolution textures, and a relatively narrow memory bus that can restrict performance compared to higher-tier cards.

Compare ZOTAC Gaming GeForce RTX 4060 Ti Twin Edge 8GB with other products in the Graphics cards category

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of ZOTAC Gaming GeForce RTX 4060 Ti Twin Edge 8GB and other products in the Graphics cards category

No results found