OVERALL

SPECS

VS AVERAGE

REVIEWS

ALTERNATIVES

ASRock Radeon RX 6750 XT Challenger Pro OC Review | 118 Data compared

Avg. price in UK: ~£480
Avg. price in US: ~$300
VRAM: 12 GB
Memory bus width: 192 bit
Thermal Design Power (TDP): 250 W

ASRock Radeon RX 6750 XT Challenger Pro OC review. Compare 118 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Graphics cards category and whether it is worth buying.

7.0

Very good

6.9

Good

8.2

Excellent

5.2
Gaming
Score components:
45.0%
3.0
Floating-point performance
25.0%
7.4
VRAM
20.0%
5.5
Ray tracing cores / units
10.0%
8.8
PCI Express (PCIe) version
6.6
Video editing
Score components:
35.0%
7.0
AV1 encode
30.0%
7.4
VRAM
20.0%
3.0
Floating-point performance
15.0%
8.8
PCI Express (PCIe) version
4.9
1080p
Score components:
55.0%
3.0
Floating-point performance
25.0%
7.4
VRAM
10.0%
5.5
Ray tracing cores / units
10.0%
8.8
PCI Express (PCIe) version
5.0
1440p
Score components:
50.0%
3.0
Floating-point performance
30.0%
7.4
VRAM
15.0%
5.5
Ray tracing cores / units
5.0%
8.8
PCI Express (PCIe) version
5.3
4K
Score components:
40.0%
3.0
Floating-point performance
35.0%
7.4
VRAM
20.0%
5.5
Ray tracing cores / units
5.0%
8.8
PCI Express (PCIe) version

Best prices in UK

£?

Best rankings

#144 in Best 12 GB Graphic Cards
#155 in Best AMD Radeon Graphic Cards
#611 in Best Graphic Cards
#644 in Best Graphic Cards For Video Editing
#647 in Best Graphic Cards For 1080p Gaming
#663 in Best Graphic Cards For Gaming
#704 in Best Graphic Cards For 1440p Gaming

Verdict

The ASRock Radeon RX 6750 XT Challenger Pro 12GB OC is a factory-overclocked graphics card built on the 7nm RDNA 2 architecture, featuring a boost clock up to 2618 MHz and 12GB of high-speed 18 Gbps GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit interface. Designed for high-fidelity 1440p gaming, it utilizes a 2.3-slot triple-fan thermal system with Striped Axial Fans and a stylish metal backplate to ensure stable 0dB silent cooling under load. Main pros include its excellent cooling efficiency, robust build quality, and strong price-to-performance ratio for mid-range builds. However, its significant length of 303mm may pose compatibility issues in smaller cases, it lacks integrated RGB lighting, and some users have noted audible coil whine during intensive operation.

Technical Specifications of graphics card ASRock Radeon RX 6750 XT Challenger Pro OC

Overall score

7.0

Show more

Hide

Popularity

What it is: An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the graphics card.

When it matters: When you prefer a graphics card that has already been chosen and reviewed by many other users.

Performance

6.2

Show more

Hide

3DMark Time Spy benchmark score

What it is: Benchmark result from 3DMark Time Spy, a synthetic DirectX 12 test often used as a quick gaming-performance reference.

When it matters: When you need a fast rough performance sort before digging into game-specific reviews and frame-rate data.

Importance: LOW

3DMark Port Royal score

What it is: Benchmark result from 3DMark Port Royal, a synthetic test focused on ray tracing performance.

When it matters: When ray tracing matters in the games you actually play and you want one quick way to separate stronger and weaker RT cards.

Importance: LOW

PassMark (G3D) result

What it is: Overall GPU performance score in PassMark G3D benchmark

When it matters: When you need one broad score to sort cards into rough performance tiers.

Importance: LOW

PassMark (DirectCompute) result

What it is: PassMark score for DirectCompute performance tests

When it matters: When compute workloads matter alongside gaming performance.

Importance: LOW

Floating-point performance

What it is: Theoretical floating-point compute performance of the GPU.

When it matters: When rendering, AI, or heavy compute work needs strong single-precision throughput.

Importance: LOW

Show more

Memory

6.2

Show more

Hide

VRAM

What it is: Total video memory available on the graphics card

When it matters: When you play at high settings, use texture mods, or work with large creative projects.

Importance: HIGH

Memory type

What it is: Type of graphics memory used (GDDR6, HBM2e, etc.)

When it matters: When memory technology is part of the buying decision because it affects bandwidth class, power use, and product positioning.

Importance: LOW

GDDR6

GDDR version

What it is: Generation of GDDR memory used by the graphics card.

When it matters: When you want to separate older memory generations from newer ones before comparing bandwidth, power behavior, and market tier.

Importance: LOW

Memory bus width

What it is: Width of the memory interface bus in bits

When it matters: When you care about steadier performance at higher resolutions, heavier texture settings, or ray-traced workloads that stress memory traffic.

Importance: HIGH

Maximum memory bandwidth

What it is: Maximum data transfer rate between GPU and its memory

When it matters: When 4K gaming, ray tracing, or creator work can choke a slower memory subsystem.

Importance: HIGH

Show more

Platform & Features

9.2

Show more

Hide

PCI Express (PCIe) version

What it is: Version of PCI Express interface supported

When it matters: When you are pairing the card with an older motherboard and want to avoid leaving bandwidth or future compatibility on the table.

Importance: LOW

PCIe lanes

What it is: Number of PCI Express lanes used for communication

When it matters: When limited lane width could bottleneck the card in some systems.

Importance: LOW

DirectX version

What it is: Highest supported DirectX API version

When it matters: When you play newer Windows games that depend on the latest graphics features.

Importance: LOW

Vulkan version

What it is: Highest supported Vulkan API version

When it matters: When modern games, emulators, or creative apps lean on Vulkan support.

Importance: LOW

OpenGL version

What it is: Highest supported OpenGL API version

When it matters: When older games or pro apps still depend on OpenGL compatibility.

Importance: LOW

Show more

Connectivity & Media

9.1

Show more

Hide

Max displays supported

What it is: Total number of external displays supported simultaneously

When it matters: When you run a multi-monitor desk for sim racing, trading, or editing.

Importance: LOW

Max digital resolution

What it is: Maximum supported digital display resolution

When it matters: When you plan to drive 4K or 8K panels at their native resolution.

Importance: LOW

DisplayPort outputs

What it is: Number of DisplayPort video outputs

When it matters: When your setup needs several high-refresh monitors without adapters.

Importance: LOW

DisplayPort version

What it is: Version of DisplayPort standard supported

When it matters: When your monitor setup depends on newer DisplayPort features for higher refresh rates, higher resolution, or better cable flexibility.

Importance: LOW

DisplayPort link rates

What it is: Supported data link rates for DisplayPort connections

When it matters: When you are pushing high resolution and refresh rate over DisplayPort.

Importance: LOW

Show more

Power & Cooling

8.3

Show more

Hide

Thermal Design Power (TDP)

What it is: Typical power consumption under full load (TDP)

When it matters: When you need a realistic idea of power draw before choosing a PSU or case.

Importance: MEDIUM

Power consumption while under peak load

What it is: Peak power draw of the graphics card under maximum load.

When it matters: When transient-heavy gaming loads could stress your power supply.

Importance: LOW

Recommended PSU wattage

What it is: Recommended wattage of the system power supply

When it matters: When you are checking whether your current power supply is enough.

Importance: LOW

Board power limit

What it is: Maximum configurable power limit for the GPU board

When it matters: When you care about how far the card can be pushed through tuning or factory power settings.

Importance: LOW

PCIe power spec

What it is: PCIe power delivery specification followed

When it matters: When you are checking whether the slot and external cables match the card's intended power-delivery standard.

Importance: LOW

250 W

Show more

Design

7.0

Show more

Hide

Size

What it is: Physical size of the GPU card

When it matters: When you need the card to fit a compact case without blocking nearby hardware.

Importance: LOW

Length

What it is: Physical length of the GPU card

When it matters: When front radiators or drive cages leave only limited GPU clearance.

Importance: LOW

Height

What it is: Physical height of the GPU card

When it matters: When side panels, brackets, or tight case layouts reduce vertical clearance.

Importance: LOW

Slot width

What it is: Number of PCIe slots occupied by the card

When it matters: When you need room for another PCIe card or better airflow under the GPU.

Importance: LOW

Weight

What it is: Total weight of the graphics card

When it matters: When sag, bracket support, or shipping stress matters in your build.

Importance: LOW

Show more

ASRock Radeon RX 6750 XT Challenger Pro OC vs the average graphics card

Why is ASRock Radeon RX 6750 XT Challenger Pro OC better than the average graphics card?

Show more

Hide

4.5% higher boost clock speed
ASRock Radeon RX 6750 XT Challenger Pro OC has a higher boost GPU clock than the average graphics card (2,618 MHz vs 2,505 MHz). The average graphics card has a boost GPU clock of 2,505 MHz.
What it is: Maximum boost frequency the GPU can reach under load
When it matters: When you want a rough idea of peak advertised frequency, while knowing real sustained clocks still depend on cooling and power limits.
Importance: HIGH
ASRock Radeon RX 6750 XT Challenger Pro OC has a higher boost GPU clock than the average graphics card (2,618 MHz vs 2,505 MHz). The average graphics card has a boost GPU clock of 2,505 MHz.2618 MHz vs 2505 MHz
24x more Infinity Cache
ASRock Radeon RX 6750 XT Challenger Pro OC has more Infinity Cache than the average graphics card (96 MB vs 4 MB). The average graphics card has 4 MB Infinity Cache.
What it is: Size of the L3 or Infinity Cache memory
When it matters: When you want to know whether extra on-chip cache may help the card avoid VRAM bottlenecks in modern high-resolution games.
Importance: LOW
ASRock Radeon RX 6750 XT Challenger Pro OC has more Infinity Cache than the average graphics card (96 MB vs 4 MB). The average graphics card has 4 MB Infinity Cache.96 MB vs 4 MB
28.6% faster VRAM clock
ASRock Radeon RX 6750 XT Challenger Pro OC has a higher VRAM clock than the average graphics card (2,250 MHz vs 1,750 MHz). The average graphics card runs its VRAM at 1,750 MHz.
What it is: Speed at which the GPU memory operates
When it matters: When you want more context on how quickly the card's VRAM can move data.
Importance: LOW
ASRock Radeon RX 6750 XT Challenger Pro OC has a higher VRAM clock than the average graphics card (2,250 MHz vs 1,750 MHz). The average graphics card runs its VRAM at 1,750 MHz.2250 MHz vs 1750 MHz
16.4% higher base clock speed
ASRock Radeon RX 6750 XT Challenger Pro OC has a higher base GPU clock than the average graphics card (2,235 MHz vs 1920 MHz). The average graphics card has a base GPU clock of 1920 MHz.
What it is: Base operating frequency of the GPU core under standard conditions
When it matters: When you want to understand the card's guaranteed starting frequency instead of looking only at optimistic boost figures.
Importance: HIGH
ASRock Radeon RX 6750 XT Challenger Pro OC has a higher base GPU clock than the average graphics card (2,235 MHz vs 1920 MHz). The average graphics card has a base GPU clock of 1920 MHz.2235 MHz vs 1920 MHz
Supports multi-GPU linking
ASRock Radeon RX 6750 XT Challenger Pro OC supports multi-GPU linking, the average graphics card does not.
What it is: Supports NVIDIA SLI or AMD CrossFire multi-GPU setup
When it matters: When you still run legacy multi-GPU gaming or rendering workflows.
Importance: LOW
ASRock Radeon RX 6750 XT Challenger Pro OC supports multi-GPU linking, the average graphics card does not.
Better FP64 ratio
ASRock Radeon RX 6750 XT Challenger Pro OC has a better FP64 ratio than the average graphics card (1:16 vs 1:64).
What it is: Ratio of double-precision (FP64) to single-precision (FP32) performance
When it matters: When you need to know whether FP64 is merely present or genuinely useful.
Importance: LOW
ASRock Radeon RX 6750 XT Challenger Pro OC has a better FP64 ratio than the average graphics card (1:16 vs 1:64).1:16 vs 1:64
More compact card size
ASRock Radeon RX 6750 XT Challenger Pro OC is more compact than the average graphics card (303x131x 45 mm vs 285x127x 52 mm). The average graphics card has a size of 285x127x 52 mm.
What it is: Physical size of the GPU card
When it matters: When you need the card to fit a compact case without blocking nearby hardware.
Importance: LOW
ASRock Radeon RX 6750 XT Challenger Pro OC is more compact than the average graphics card (303x131x 45 mm vs 285x127x 52 mm). The average graphics card has a size of 285x127x 52 mm.303x131 x 45 mm vs 285x127 x 52 mm
50% lower idle power draw
ASRock Radeon RX 6750 XT Challenger Pro OC has a lower idle power draw than the average graphics card (6 W vs 12 W). The average graphics card has an idle power draw of 12 W.
What it is: Power consumption of the graphics card while idle.
When it matters: When the PC stays on for long hours and background power draw adds up.
Importance: LOW
ASRock Radeon RX 6750 XT Challenger Pro OC has a lower idle power draw than the average graphics card (6 W vs 12 W). The average graphics card has an idle power draw of 12 W.6 W vs 12 W
4.5% higher boost clock speed
ASRock Radeon RX 6750 XT Challenger Pro OC has a higher boost GPU clock than the average graphics card (2,618 MHz vs 2,505 MHz). The average graphics card has a boost GPU clock of 2,505 MHz.
16.4% higher base clock speed
ASRock Radeon RX 6750 XT Challenger Pro OC has a higher base GPU clock than the average graphics card (2,235 MHz vs 1920 MHz). The average graphics card has a base GPU clock of 1920 MHz.
Better FP64 ratio
ASRock Radeon RX 6750 XT Challenger Pro OC has a better FP64 ratio than the average graphics card (1:16 vs 1:64).
24x more Infinity Cache
ASRock Radeon RX 6750 XT Challenger Pro OC has more Infinity Cache than the average graphics card (96 MB vs 4 MB). The average graphics card has 4 MB Infinity Cache.
28.6% faster VRAM clock
ASRock Radeon RX 6750 XT Challenger Pro OC has a higher VRAM clock than the average graphics card (2,250 MHz vs 1,750 MHz). The average graphics card runs its VRAM at 1,750 MHz.
Supports multi-GPU linking
ASRock Radeon RX 6750 XT Challenger Pro OC supports multi-GPU linking, the average graphics card does not.
50% lower idle power draw
ASRock Radeon RX 6750 XT Challenger Pro OC has a lower idle power draw than the average graphics card (6 W vs 12 W). The average graphics card has an idle power draw of 12 W.
More compact card size
ASRock Radeon RX 6750 XT Challenger Pro OC is more compact than the average graphics card (303x131x 45 mm vs 285x127x 52 mm). The average graphics card has a size of 285x127x 52 mm.

Platform & Features

Power & Cooling

Why is ASRock Radeon RX 6750 XT Challenger Pro OC worse than the average graphics card?

Show more

Hide

No CUDA support
ASRock Radeon RX 6750 XT Challenger Pro OC does not support CUDA, the average graphics card does.
144 fewer AI cores
ASRock Radeon RX 6750 XT Challenger Pro OC has fewer AI cores than the average graphics card (0 vs 144). The average graphics card has 144 AI cores.
40.6% lower FP32 performance
ASRock Radeon RX 6750 XT Challenger Pro OC has a lower FP32 performance than the average graphics card (13.4 TFLOPS vs 22.57 TFLOPS). The average graphics card has FP32 performance of 22.57 TFLOPS.
37.8% lower ray tracing score
ASRock Radeon RX 6750 XT Challenger Pro OC has a lower ray tracing score than the average graphics card (5,698 points vs 9,166 points). The average graphics card has a ray tracing score of 9,166 points.
24 fewer TMUs
ASRock Radeon RX 6750 XT Challenger Pro OC has fewer TMUs than the average graphics card (160 vs 184). The average graphics card has 184 TMUs.
38.5% lower compute score
ASRock Radeon RX 6750 XT Challenger Pro OC has a lower compute score than the average graphics card (7,426 points vs 12,074 points). The average graphics card has a compute score of 12,074 points.
64 bit narrower memory bus
ASRock Radeon RX 6750 XT Challenger Pro OC has a narrower memory bus than the average graphics card (192 bit vs 256 bit). The average graphics card has a memory bus width of 256 bit.
87.5% smaller L2 cache
ASRock Radeon RX 6750 XT Challenger Pro OC has fewer L2 cache than the average graphics card (3 MB vs 24 MB). The average graphics card has 24 MB L2 cache.
5.3% slower memory speed
ASRock Radeon RX 6750 XT Challenger Pro OC has a lower effective memory speed than the average graphics card (18,000 MHz vs 19,000 MHz). The average graphics card reaches an effective memory speed of 19,000 MHz.
3.6% lower memory bandwidth
ASRock Radeon RX 6750 XT Challenger Pro OC has a lower memory bandwidth than the average graphics card (432 GB/s vs 448 GB/s). The average graphics card has a memory bandwidth of 448 GB/s.
No DLSS support
ASRock Radeon RX 6750 XT Challenger Pro OC does not support DLSS, the average graphics card does.
40% larger process node
ASRock Radeon RX 6750 XT Challenger Pro OC has a higher process node than the average graphics card (7 nm vs 5 nm). The average graphics card uses a process node of 5 nm.
Older encoder generation
ASRock Radeon RX 6750 XT Challenger Pro OC uses an older encoder generation than the average graphics card (4 vs 8). The average graphics card uses encoder generation 8.
Older OpenCL version
ASRock Radeon RX 6750 XT Challenger Pro OC supports an older OpenCL version than the average graphics card (2.1 vs 3.0).
1 older
ASRock Radeon RX 6750 XT Challenger Pro OC was released earlier than the average graphics card (2022 vs 2023).
May 2022
No AV1 encoding
ASRock Radeon RX 6750 XT Challenger Pro OC does not support AV1 encoding, the average graphics card does.
Narrower encode codec support
ASRock Radeon RX 6750 XT Challenger Pro OC supports narrower hardware encode codec support than the average graphics card (H.264/H.265/AV1 vs H.264/H.265/AV1/VP9).
No dual BIOS
ASRock Radeon RX 6750 XT Challenger Pro OC does not include dual BIOS, the average graphics card does.
16.3% higher TDP
ASRock Radeon RX 6750 XT Challenger Pro OC has a higher TDP than the average graphics card (250 W vs 215 W). The average graphics card has a TDP of 215 W.
15 °C lower thermal ceiling
ASRock Radeon RX 6750 XT Challenger Pro OC has a lower thermal ceiling than the average graphics card (110 °C vs 95 °C). The average graphics card has a thermal ceiling of 95 °C.
8.6 dB noisier under load
ASRock Radeon RX 6750 XT Challenger Pro OC has a higher load noise level than the average graphics card (44 dB vs 35.4 dB). The average graphics card has a load noise level of 35.4 dB.
7.7% higher PSU requirement
ASRock Radeon RX 6750 XT Challenger Pro OC has a higher PSU requirement than the average graphics card (700 W vs 650 W). The average graphics card has a PSU requirement of 650 W.
8 °C higher idle temperature
ASRock Radeon RX 6750 XT Challenger Pro OC has a higher idle temperature than the average graphics card (45 °C vs 37 °C). The average graphics card has an idle temperature of 37 °C.
No RGB lighting
ASRock Radeon RX 6750 XT Challenger Pro OC does not include RGB lighting, the average graphics card does.
6 mm higher card profile
ASRock Radeon RX 6750 XT Challenger Pro OC is taller than the average graphics card (131 mm vs 125 mm). The average graphics card has a height of 125 mm.
18 mm longer card length
ASRock Radeon RX 6750 XT Challenger Pro OC is longer than the average graphics card (303 mm vs 285 mm). The average graphics card has a length of 285 mm.
No CUDA support
ASRock Radeon RX 6750 XT Challenger Pro OC does not support CUDA, the average graphics card does.
What it is: Supports CUDA parallel computing platform
When it matters: When your apps or AI tools specifically depend on the CUDA software stack.
Importance: MEDIUM
ASRock Radeon RX 6750 XT Challenger Pro OC does not support CUDA, the average graphics card does.
64 bit narrower memory bus
ASRock Radeon RX 6750 XT Challenger Pro OC has a narrower memory bus than the average graphics card (192 bit vs 256 bit). The average graphics card has a memory bus width of 256 bit.
What it is: Width of the memory interface bus in bits
When it matters: When you care about steadier performance at higher resolutions, heavier texture settings, or ray-traced workloads that stress memory traffic.
Importance: HIGH
ASRock Radeon RX 6750 XT Challenger Pro OC has a narrower memory bus than the average graphics card (192 bit vs 256 bit). The average graphics card has a memory bus width of 256 bit.192 bit vs 256 bit
No DLSS support
ASRock Radeon RX 6750 XT Challenger Pro OC does not support DLSS, the average graphics card does.
What it is: Supports NVIDIA DLSS upscaling technology
When it matters: When you play NVIDIA-supported games and want better frame rates at higher settings.
Importance: LOW
ASRock Radeon RX 6750 XT Challenger Pro OC does not support DLSS, the average graphics card does.
144 fewer AI cores
ASRock Radeon RX 6750 XT Challenger Pro OC has fewer AI cores than the average graphics card (0 vs 144). The average graphics card has 144 AI cores.
What it is: Number of tensor or AI processing cores
When it matters: When AI features, frame generation, or creator tools use dedicated matrix hardware.
Importance: MEDIUM
ASRock Radeon RX 6750 XT Challenger Pro OC has fewer AI cores than the average graphics card (0 vs 144). The average graphics card has 144 AI cores.0 vs 144
No dual BIOS
ASRock Radeon RX 6750 XT Challenger Pro OC does not include dual BIOS, the average graphics card does.
What it is: Includes dual BIOS for redundancy or overclocking profiles
When it matters: When you want a safer recovery path after tweaking fan curves or overclock settings, or you need separate quiet and performance profiles.
Importance: LOW
ASRock Radeon RX 6750 XT Challenger Pro OC does not include dual BIOS, the average graphics card does.
40% larger process node
ASRock Radeon RX 6750 XT Challenger Pro OC has a higher process node than the average graphics card (7 nm vs 5 nm). The average graphics card uses a process node of 5 nm.
What it is: Size of the manufacturing process in nanometers
When it matters: When process node differences may affect power, heat, and overall efficiency.
Importance: MEDIUM
ASRock Radeon RX 6750 XT Challenger Pro OC has a higher process node than the average graphics card (7 nm vs 5 nm). The average graphics card uses a process node of 5 nm.7 nm vs 5 nm
No AV1 encoding
ASRock Radeon RX 6750 XT Challenger Pro OC does not support AV1 encoding, the average graphics card does.
What it is: Supports hardware encoding of AV1 video codec
When it matters: When you stream or export video and want efficient AV1 encoding on the GPU.
Importance: LOW
ASRock Radeon RX 6750 XT Challenger Pro OC does not support AV1 encoding, the average graphics card does.Not supported vs supported
No RGB lighting
ASRock Radeon RX 6750 XT Challenger Pro OC does not include RGB lighting, the average graphics card does.
What it is: Includes customizable RGB lighting effects
When it matters: When the GPU is part of a windowed build with synchronized lighting.
Importance: LOW
ASRock Radeon RX 6750 XT Challenger Pro OC does not include RGB lighting, the average graphics card does.

Platform & Features

Connectivity & Media

Power & Cooling

Graphic comparison of ASRock Radeon RX 6750 XT Challenger Pro OC and other products in the Graphics cards category

Attribute category

Attribute

No results found

Third-party reviews

United Kingdom

United States

(Reviews last updated: June 2026)

What customers like about ASRock Radeon RX 6750 XT Challenger Pro OC?

Excellent 1440p performance, capable of high frame rates in modern titles like BG3 and Elden Ring.
Strong price-to-performance ratio, often cited as one of the best values in the mid-range market.
The 12GB GDDR6 VRAM provides better future-proofing for high-resolution textures compared to 8GB models.
Efficient triple-fan cooling design maintains stable temperatures under heavy gaming loads.
Solid build quality featuring a stylish metal backplate that prevents PCB bending.
Quiet operation at lower temperatures thanks to the 0dB silent cooling technology.

What customers dislike about ASRock Radeon RX 6750 XT Challenger Pro OC?

Fan noise can become noticeably loud when the card is pushed to high clock speeds or under heavy stress.
Limited aesthetic features, specifically a lack of integrated RGB lighting compared to competitor models.
Ray tracing performance is relatively weak, often requiring significant setting reductions or FSR to be playable.
Physical size (triple-fan length) may not fit in smaller or more compact PC cases.
Marginal performance gains over the original RX 6700 XT despite a higher launch price and power draw.
Occasional reports of driver instability or high hotspot temperatures in specific hardware configurations.

Expert reviews

pausehardware.com

01/05/2024

Summary of the review

Test De La RX 6750 XT D’AMD : La Carte Idéale En 1440p

The review by Pause Hardware evaluates the AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT, analyzing its role as a refreshed 7nm RDNA 2 architecture component introduced alongside the 6950 XT and 6650 XT. Tested with Precision Boost Overdrive and Smart Access Memory enabled, the card features slightly higher clock speeds (2495 MHz game frequency) and faster 12GB GDDR6 memory (bandwidth up to 432 Go/s) compared to the original RX 6700 XT. In synthetic and real-world gaming tests, the card demonstrates strong capabilities, delivering an average of 69 FPS in demanding titles like Cyberpunk at 1080p and keeping a highly commendable 54 FPS average at 1440p. In software testing like 3D Mark Firestrike, it hits a maximum temperature of 79°C while consuming 202W and generating 39 dB(A) of noise, showing solid structural efficiency. The primary pros highlighted in the review are its excellent raw performance in both 1080p and 1440p, allowing users to play demanding games in highly favorable settings without needing a more expensive top-tier model. It successfully competes with higher-end models under traditional rasterisation workloads, even matching or occasionally exceeding its...

Video reviews

Best alternatives

GIGABYTE Radeon RX 7800 XT Gaming OC

Graphics cards

ASUS Prime Radeon RX 9070 OC Edition

Graphics cards

XFX Speedster Merc 319 Radeon RX 7800 XT Black Edition

Graphics cards

Sapphire Pulse Radeon RX 9070

Graphics cards

PowerColor Radeon RX 7800 XT

Graphics cards

Sapphire Pure Radeon RX 7800 XT

Graphics cards

PowerColor Fighter Radeon RX 7800 XT

Graphics cards

PowerColor Hellhound Sakura Radeon RX 7800 XT

Graphics cards

ASRock Radeon RX 7800 XT Steel Legend OC

Graphics cards

ASUS Dual Radeon RX 7800 XT OC Edition

Graphics cards

ASUS TUF Gaming Radeon RX 7800 XT OC Edition

Graphics cards

XFX Speedster SWFT 210 Radeon RX 7800 XT Core Edition

Graphics cards

Compare ASRock Radeon RX 6750 XT Challenger Pro OC with other products in the Graphics cards category

Compare