Scored using Graphics cards Methodology v1.0
Graphics cards Methodology v1.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontum Graphics cards Methodology v1.0: technical specifications plus authentic consumer ratings, with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Graphics cards Methodology v1.0

AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT Review | 118 Data compared

Avg. price:~£430VRAM:8 GBMemory bus width:256 bitThermal Design Power (TDP):225 W

AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT Review: Compare 118 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Graphics cards category and whether it is worth buying.

AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT
6.0/10

Overall score

Score
6.0/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the graphics card's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best graphics cards on the market.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

90%

5.8

Technical score

10%

8.4

User score

▼Worse than 75% of graphics cards
6.7

Value for money

Value for money
6.7/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the graphics card's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a graphics card that offers a strong balance of performance, features, and price.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

6.0

Overall score

30%

8.3

Price

▼Worse than 74%
5.8

Technical score

Technical score
5.8/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Graphics cards category across these key areas: Performance, Memory, Platform & Features, Connectivity & Media, Power & Cooling, Design.
When it matters
When you want to compare graphics cards based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

44%

4.2

Performance

24%

5.6

Memory

12%

6.8

Power & Cooling

11%

8.4

Platform & Features

5%

9.1

Design

4%

8.7

Connectivity & Media

▼Worse than 76%
8.4

User score

User score
8.4/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the graphics card.
When it matters
When you want to understand how a graphics card performs in real use and how reliable it is in terms of performance, temperatures, noise, stability, and long-term ownership.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

8.0

User ratings

30%

9.5

Number of reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
▲Better than 70%
  • amd-radeon-rx-5700-xt
  • amd-radeon-rx-5700-xt
  • amd-radeon-rx-5700-xt
  • amd-radeon-rx-5700-xt
  • amd-radeon-rx-5700-xt
  • amd-radeon-rx-5700-xt
  • amd-radeon-rx-5700-xt
  • amd-radeon-rx-5700-xt
  • amd-radeon-rx-5700-xt
amd-radeon-rx-5700-xt
amd-radeon-rx-5700-xt
amd-radeon-rx-5700-xt
amd-radeon-rx-5700-xt
amd-radeon-rx-5700-xt
amd-radeon-rx-5700-xt
amd-radeon-rx-5700-xt
amd-radeon-rx-5700-xt
amd-radeon-rx-5700-xt
Best prices
*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
Loading...
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of graphics card AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT

Technical score
Technical score
5.8/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Graphics cards category across these key areas: Performance, Memory, Platform & Features, Connectivity & Media, Power & Cooling, Design.
When it matters
When you want to compare graphics cards based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

44%

4.2

Performance

24%

5.6

Memory

12%

6.8

Power & Cooling

11%

8.4

Platform & Features

5%

9.1

Design

4%

8.7

Connectivity & Media

5.8
User score
User score
8.4/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the graphics card.
When it matters
When you want to understand how a graphics card performs in real use and how reliable it is in terms of performance, temperatures, noise, stability, and long-term ownership.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

8.0

User ratings

30%

9.5

Number of reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
8.4
Popularity
Popularity
9.5/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the graphics card.
When it matters
When you prefer a graphics card that has already been chosen and reviewed by many other users.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Popularity:
AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT has a popularity score of 9.5 points, which is higher than that of 88.2% of products in this category.
9.5
Value for money
Value for money
6.7/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the graphics card's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a graphics card that offers a strong balance of performance, features, and price.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

70%

6.0

Overall score

30%

8.3

Price

6.7
3DMark Time Spy benchmark score
9,500 points
This graphics card scores 9,500 points in 3DMark Time Spy, which is lower than 72.9% of graphics cards and equal to 0.5% of graphics cards.
3DMark Port Royal score
0 points
This graphics card scores 0 points in 3DMark Port Royal, which is lower than 83.2% of graphics cards and equal to 16.8% of graphics cards.
PassMark (G3D) result
16,167 points
This graphics card scores 16,167 points in PassMark G3D, which is lower than 73% of graphics cards and equal to 0.2% of graphics cards.
PassMark (DirectCompute) result
5,636 points
This graphics card scores 5,636 points in PassMark DirectCompute, which is lower than 80.3% of graphics cards and equal to 0.1% of graphics cards.
Floating-point performance
9.75 TFLOPS
This graphics card delivers 9.75 TFLOPS floating-point performance, which is lower than that of 75.1% of graphics cards and equal to that of 0.4% of graphics cards.
Show more
VRAM
8 GB
This graphics card has 8 GB of VRAM, which is less than 57.5% of graphics cards and equal to 25.1% of graphics cards.
Memory type
GDDR6
GDDR version
GDDR6
This graphics card uses GDDR6 memory, which is newer than on 15.9% of graphics cards and equal to 40.3% of graphics cards.
Memory bus width
256 bit
This graphics card uses a 256 bit memory bus, which is wider than that of 49.7% of graphics cards and equal to that of 35.9% of graphics cards.
Maximum memory bandwidth
448 GB/s
This graphics card reaches 448 GB/s memory bandwidth, which is higher than that of 41.1% of graphics cards and equal to that of 11% of graphics cards.
Show more
PCI Express (PCIe) version
4
This graphics card supports PCIe 4, which is newer than on 22.3% of graphics cards and equal to 52.1% of graphics cards.
PCIe lanes
x16
This graphics card uses x16 PCIe lanes, which is more than 23.4% of graphics cards and equal to 76.6% of graphics cards.
DirectX version
12.1
This graphics card supports DirectX 12.1, which is older than on 77.4% of graphics cards and equal to 4.4% of graphics cards.
Vulkan version
1.4
This graphics card supports Vulkan 1.4, which is more advanced than on 20.7% of graphics cards and equal to 79.3% of graphics cards.
OpenGL version
4.6
This graphics card supports OpenGL 4.6, which is more advanced than on 1.9% of graphics cards and equal to 98.1% of graphics cards.
Show more
Max displays supported
4
This graphics card supports up to 4 displays, which is more than 8.3% of graphics cards and equal to 88.9% of graphics cards.
Max digital resolution
7680x4320
This graphics card supports a maximum digital resolution of 7680x4320, which is higher than that of 9% of graphics cards and equal to that of 91% of graphics cards.
DisplayPort outputs
3
This graphics card offers 3 DisplayPort outputs, which is more than 21% of graphics cards and equal to 76.8% of graphics cards.
DisplayPort version
1.4a
This graphics card supports DisplayPort 1.4a, which is more advanced than on 19.5% of graphics cards and equal to 47.1% of graphics cards.
DisplayPort link rates
8.1 Gbps
This graphics card supports DisplayPort link rates up to 8.1 Gbps, which is slower than on 65% of graphics cards and equal to 22.7% of graphics cards.
Show more
Thermal Design Power (TDP)
225 W
This graphics card has a TDP of 225 W, which is higher than that of 54.4% of graphics cards and equal to that of 1.1% of graphics cards.
Power consumption while under peak load
225 W
This graphics card draws 225 W under peak load, which is higher than 51.7% of graphics cards and equal to 1.2% of graphics cards.
Recommended PSU wattage
600 W
This graphics card recommends a 600 W PSU, which is lower than that of 54.3% of graphics cards and equal to that of 7.9% of graphics cards.
Board power limit
270 W
This graphics card has a board power limit of 270 W, which is higher than that of 61.4% of graphics cards and equal to that of 0.9% of graphics cards.
PCIe power spec
225 W
Show more
Size
272x 111x 36 mm
Length
272 mm
This graphics card is 272 mm long, which is shorter than 56.6% of graphics cards and equal in length to 0.4% of graphics cards.
Height
111 mm
This graphics card is 111 mm tall, which is shorter than 83.5% of graphics cards and equal in height to 5.1% of graphics cards.
Slot width
2 slot/s
This graphics card occupies 2 slot/s, which is slimmer than 53.4% of graphics cards and equal in width to 42.5% of graphics cards.
Weight
1,100 g
This graphics card weighs 1,100 g, which is heavier than 54.2% of graphics cards and equal in weight to 1.1% of graphics cards.
Show more

AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT vs the average graphics card

246810TotalPerformanceMemoryPlatform & FeaturesConnectivity & MediaPower & CoolingDesign
  • 14 mm lower card height
    This graphics card is shorter than the average graphics card (111 mm vs 125 mm). The average graphics card has a height of 125 mm.
    111 mm vs 125 mm
  • 0.5 slot/s slimmer design
    This graphics card occupies fewer slots than the average graphics card (2 slot/s vs 2.5 slot/s). The average graphics card occupies 2.5 slot/s.
    2 slot/s vs 2.5 slot/s
  • Better FP64 ratio
    This graphics card has a better FP64 ratio than the average graphics card (1:16 vs 1:64).
    1:16 vs 1:64
  • 5.6% higher user score
    User score
    8.4/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the graphics card.
    When it matters
    When you want to understand how a graphics card performs in real use and how reliable it is in terms of performance, temperatures, noise, stability, and long-term ownership.
    Score distribution
    ▼
    ▼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT
    the average graphics card
    AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT has a higher user score than the average graphics card (8.45 vs 8.000).
    8.45 vs 8
  • 2.26x more popular
    AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT is more popular than the average graphics card (9.53 vs 4.2).
    9.53 vs 4.22
  • 4x larger L1 cache
    This graphics card has more L1 cache than the average graphics card (512 vs 128). The average graphics card has 128 L1 cache.
    512 vs 128
  • 7.7% lower PSU requirement
    This graphics card has a lower PSU requirement than the average graphics card (600 W vs 650 W). The average graphics card has a PSU requirement of 650 W.
    600 W vs 650 W
  • 5.6% higher user score
    User score
    8.4/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the graphics card.
    When it matters
    When you want to understand how a graphics card performs in real use and how reliable it is in terms of performance, temperatures, noise, stability, and long-term ownership.
    Score distribution
    ▼
    ▼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT
    the average graphics card
    AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT has a higher user score than the average graphics card (8.45 vs 8.000).
    8.45 vs 8
  • 2.26x more popular
    AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT is more popular than the average graphics card (9.53 vs 4.2).
    9.53 vs 4.22
  • Better FP64 ratio
    This graphics card has a better FP64 ratio than the average graphics card (1:16 vs 1:64).
    1:16 vs 1:64
  • 4x larger L1 cache
    This graphics card has more L1 cache than the average graphics card (512 vs 128). The average graphics card has 128 L1 cache.
    512 vs 128
  • 7.7% lower PSU requirement
    This graphics card has a lower PSU requirement than the average graphics card (600 W vs 650 W). The average graphics card has a PSU requirement of 650 W.
    600 W vs 650 W
  • 14 mm lower card height
    This graphics card is shorter than the average graphics card (111 mm vs 125 mm). The average graphics card has a height of 125 mm.
    111 mm vs 125 mm
  • 0.5 slot/s slimmer design
    This graphics card occupies fewer slots than the average graphics card (2 slot/s vs 2.5 slot/s). The average graphics card occupies 2.5 slot/s.
    2 slot/s vs 2.5 slot/s
  • 40 fewer ray tracing cores
    This graphics card has fewer ray tracing cores than the average graphics card (0 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 ray tracing cores.
    0 vs 40
  • 2 fewer fans
    This graphics card has fewer fans than the average graphics card (1 vs 3).
    1 vs 3
  • No CUDA support
    This graphics card does not support CUDA, the average graphics card does.
  • 24% lower boost clock speed
    This graphics card has a lower boost GPU clock than the average graphics card (1905 MHz vs 2505 MHz). The average graphics card has a boost GPU clock of 2505 MHz.
    1,905 MHz vs 2,505 MHz
  • 4 GB less VRAM
    This graphics card has fewer VRAM than the average graphics card (8 GB vs 12 GB). The average graphics card has 12 GB VRAM.
    8 GB vs 12 GB
  • No DLSS support
    This graphics card does not support DLSS, the average graphics card does.
  • No ray tracing
    This graphics card does not support ray tracing, the average graphics card does.
  • 144 fewer AI cores
    This graphics card has fewer AI cores than the average graphics card (0 vs 144). The average graphics card has 144 AI cores.
    0 vs 144
  • 7.6% worse value for money
    AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT has worse value for money than the average graphics card (6.69 vs 7.2).
    6.69 vs 7.2
  • 40 fewer ray tracing cores
    This graphics card has fewer ray tracing cores than the average graphics card (0 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 ray tracing cores.
    0 vs 40
  • No CUDA support
    This graphics card does not support CUDA, the average graphics card does.
  • 24% lower boost clock speed
    This graphics card has a lower boost GPU clock than the average graphics card (1905 MHz vs 2505 MHz). The average graphics card has a boost GPU clock of 2505 MHz.
    1,905 MHz vs 2,505 MHz
  • 144 fewer AI cores
    This graphics card has fewer AI cores than the average graphics card (0 vs 144). The average graphics card has 144 AI cores.
    0 vs 144
  • 56.8% lower FP32 performance
    This graphics card has a lower FP32 performance than the average graphics card (9.8 TFLOPS vs 22.57 TFLOPS). The average graphics card has FP32 performance of 22.57 TFLOPS.
    9.75 TFLOPS vs 22.57 TFLOPS
  • 16.4% lower base clock speed
    This graphics card has a lower base GPU clock than the average graphics card (1605 MHz vs 1920 MHz). The average graphics card has a base GPU clock of 1920 MHz.
    1,605 MHz vs 1,920 MHz
  • 25.3% lower pixel rate
    This graphics card has a lower pixel rate than the average graphics card (121.9 GPixel/s vs 163.2 GPixel/s). The average graphics card has a pixel rate of 163.2 GPixel/s.
    121.9 GPixel/s vs 163.2 GPixel/s
  • 20% lower texture rate
    This graphics card has a lower texture rate than the average graphics card (304.8 GTexel/s vs 381.2 GTexel/s). The average graphics card has a texture rate of 381.2 GTexel/s.
    304.8 GTexel/s vs 381.2 GTexel/s
  • 28.6% lower PassMark score
    This graphics card has a lower PassMark score than the average graphics card (16167 points vs 22653 points). The average graphics card has a PassMark score of 22653 points.
    16,167 points vs 22,653 points
  • 35.3% lower gaming score
    This graphics card has a lower gaming score than the average graphics card (9500 points vs 14678.5 points). The average graphics card has a gaming score of 14678.5 points.
    9,500 points vs 14,678.5 points
  • 24 fewer TMUs
    This graphics card has fewer TMUs than the average graphics card (160 vs 184). The average graphics card has 184 TMUs.
    160 vs 184
  • 53.3% lower compute score
    This graphics card has a lower compute score than the average graphics card (5636 points vs 12074 points). The average graphics card has a compute score of 12074 points.
    5,636 points vs 12,074 points
  • 4 GB less VRAM
    This graphics card has fewer VRAM than the average graphics card (8 GB vs 12 GB). The average graphics card has 12 GB VRAM.
    8 GB vs 12 GB
  • 26.3% slower memory speed
    This graphics card has a lower effective memory speed than the average graphics card (14000 MHz vs 19000 MHz). The average graphics card reaches an effective memory speed of 19000 MHz.
    14,000 MHz vs 19,000 MHz
  • 83.3% smaller L2 cache
    This graphics card has fewer L2 cache than the average graphics card (4 MB vs 24 MB). The average graphics card has 24 MB L2 cache.
    4 MB vs 24 MB
  • No DLSS support
    This graphics card does not support DLSS, the average graphics card does.
  • No ray tracing
    This graphics card does not support ray tracing, the average graphics card does.
  • 40% larger process node
    This graphics card has a higher process node than the average graphics card (7 nm vs 5 nm). The average graphics card uses a process node of 5 nm.
    7 nm vs 5 nm
  • No mesh shaders
    This graphics card does not support mesh shaders, the average graphics card does.
  • No XeSS support
    This graphics card does not support XeSS, the average graphics card does.
  • 4 older
    This graphics card was released earlier than the average graphics card (2019 vs 2023).
    July 2019
    2,019 vs 2,023
  • No DirectStorage support
    This graphics card does not support DirectStorage, the average graphics card does.
  • Older DirectX version
    This graphics card supports an older DirectX version than the average graphics card (12.1 vs 12 Ultimate).
    12.1 vs 12 Ultimate
  • Older OpenCL version
    This graphics card supports an older OpenCL version than the average graphics card (2.1 vs 3).
    2.1 vs 3.0
  • No sampler feedback
    This graphics card does not support sampler feedback, the average graphics card does.
  • Older encoder generation
    This graphics card uses an older encoder generation than the average graphics card (7 vs 8). The average graphics card uses encoder generation 8.
    7 vs 8
  • 55% fewer transistors
    This graphics card has fewer transistors than the average graphics card (10300 million vs 22900 million). The average graphics card has 22900 million transistors.
    10,300 million vs 22,900 million
  • No AV1 encoding
    This graphics card does not support AV1 encoding, the average graphics card does.
  • No AV1 decoding
    This graphics card does not support AV1 decoding, the average graphics card does.
  • Older HDMI version
    This graphics card supports an older HDMI version than the average graphics card (2.0b vs 2.1).
    2.0b vs 2.1
  • Narrower encode codec support
    This graphics card supports narrower hardware encode codec support than the average graphics card (H.264/H.265/VP9 vs H.264/H.265/AV1/VP9).
    H.264/H.265/VP9 vs H.264/H.265/AV1/VP9
  • Older HDCP version
    This graphics card supports an older HDCP version than the average graphics card (2.2 vs 2.3).
    2.2 vs 2.3
  • Narrower decode codec support
    This graphics card supports narrower hardware decode codec support than the average graphics card (H.264/H.265/AV1/VP9 vs H.264/H.265/AV1/VP9/MPEG-2/VC-1).
    H.264/H.265/AV1/VP9 vs H.264/H.265/AV1/VP9/MPEG-2/VC-1
  • 2 fewer fans
    This graphics card has fewer fans than the average graphics card (1 vs 3).
    1 vs 3
  • No fan stop
    This graphics card does not support fan stop, the average graphics card does.
  • 15 °C lower thermal ceiling
    This graphics card has a lower thermal ceiling than the average graphics card (110 °C vs 95 °C). The average graphics card has a thermal ceiling of 95 °C.
    110 °C vs 95 °C
  • 25 °C higher load temperature
    This graphics card has a higher load temperature than the average graphics card (92 °C vs 67 °C). The average graphics card has a load temperature of 67 °C.
    92 °C vs 67 °C
  • 7.6 dB noisier under load
    This graphics card has a higher load noise level than the average graphics card (43 dB vs 35.4 dB). The average graphics card has a load noise level of 35.4 dB.
    43 dB vs 35.4 dB
  • 27 dB noisier at idle
    This graphics card has a higher idle noise level than the average graphics card (27 dB vs 0 dB). The average graphics card has an idle noise level of 0 dB.
    27 dB vs 0 dB
  • 11 °C higher idle temperature
    This graphics card has a higher idle temperature than the average graphics card (48 °C vs 37 °C). The average graphics card has an idle temperature of 37 °C.
    48 °C vs 37 °C
  • 20% higher board power limit
    This graphics card has a higher board power limit than the average graphics card (270 W vs 225 W). The average graphics card has a board power limit of 225 W.
    270 W vs 225 W
  • 4.7% higher TDP
    This graphics card has a higher TDP than the average graphics card (225 W vs 215 W). The average graphics card has a TDP of 215 W.
    225 W vs 215 W

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

T
techspot.com
24/04/2024
Summary of the review
T
techspot.com
04/08/2022
Summary of the review
T
tomshardware.com
06/02/2020
Summary of the review
T
tomshardware.com
28/01/2020
Summary of the review
T
tomshardware.com
21/11/2019
Summary of the review
T
techspot.com
14/08/2019
Summary of the review
U
uk.pcmag.com
11/07/2019
Summary of the review
T
techspot.com
08/07/2019
Summary of the review
P
pk.ign.com
07/07/2019
Summary of the review
A
au.pcmag.com
11/07/2019
Summary of the review
T
tomshardware.com
21/11/2019
Summary of the review
T
techpowerup.com
07/07/2019
Summary of the review
W
wepc.com
19/10/2023
Summary of the review
E
expertreviews.co.uk
06/08/2019
Summary of the review
T
techradar.com
19/07/2022
Summary of the review
R
rockpapershotgun.com
07/07/2019
Summary of the review
T
trustedreviews.com
07/07/2019
Summary of the review
G
geeknetic.es
07/07/2019
Summary of the review
P
profesionalreview.com
08/10/2019
Summary of the review
G
geektopia.es
07/09/2019
Summary of the review

Third-party reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
Reviews last updated: June 2026 · How we calculate this

What we like about AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT

  • Excellent price-to-performance ratio compared to equivalent Nvidia cards
  • Strong 1440p gaming performance, often exceeding 60fps in AAA titles
  • Innovative RDNA architecture with significant IPC improvements over older GCN cards
  • Useful software features like Radeon Image Sharpening (RIS) and Radeon Anti-Lag
  • Support for PCIe 4.0, providing early future-proofing for compatible systems
  • Competitive power efficiency for its performance tier

What we don't like about AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT

  • Reference 'blower-style' cooler runs very hot (high junction temperatures) and loud
  • Lacks hardware-based ray tracing support, which is standard on rival RTX cards
  • History of driver instability, specifically 'black screen' crashes and system freezes
  • Limited overclocking headroom due to thermal constraints on stock designs
  • Some third-party models (like the early Asus TUF Gaming X3) had poor VRAM cooling
  • High VRAM power consumption at idle with high-refresh-rate monitors

Verdict

The AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT is a high-end graphics card built on the 7nm RDNA architecture, featuring a Navi 10 GPU with 2,560 stream processors, 160 texture mapping units (TMUs), and 64 ROPs. It is equipped with 8GB of GDDR6 VRAM on a 256-bit memory bus, delivering a bandwidth of 448 GB/s and operating at a base clock of 1,605 MHz with a boost up to 1,905 MHz. Its main strengths include excellent price-to-performance value for 1440p gaming, high energy efficiency compared to previous GCN architectures with a 225W TDP, and support for PCIe 4.0. However, its notable drawbacks include a lack of hardware-accelerated ray tracing, relatively high operating temperatures that can exceed 100°C (Tjunction), and a noisy blower-style cooler on the reference model.

Compare AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT with other products in the Graphics cards category

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT and other products in the Graphics cards category

No results found