Scored using Fitness trackers Methodology v1.0
Fitness trackers Methodology v1.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are evaluated mathematically under Frontumo Fitness trackers Methodology v1.0 using verified laboratory benchmarks, technical specifications, and authentic consumer ratings with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Fitness trackers Methodology v1.0

Xiaomi Mi Band 8 Review | 171 Data compared

Avg. price:~£25Battery life:16 daysScreen size:1.62 inchHeart rate monitor:yesGPS:noWaterproof depth rating:50 m

Xiaomi Mi Band 8 Review: Compare 171 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Fitness trackers category and whether it is worth buying.

8.8

Overall score

Score
8.8/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the fitness tracker's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best fitness trackers on the market.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

80%

8.9

Technical score

20%

8.4

User score

★Better than 98% of fitness-trackers
8.9

Technical score

Technical score
8.9/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Fitness trackers category across these key areas: Health, Sports & Navigation, Smart Features, App & Wellness, Connectivity, Battery, Display, Design & Durability.
When it matters
When you want to compare fitness trackers based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

20%

9.2

Sports & Navigation

20%

8.3

Battery

18%

9.0

Health

18%

9.5

Display

8%

9.1

Smart Features

8%

9.2

App & Wellness

4%

8.2

Connectivity

4%

8.1

Design & Durability

★Better than 98% of fitness-trackers
8.4

User score

User score
8.4/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the fitness tracker.
When it matters
When you want to know how a fitness tracker performs in daily use and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

8.2

User ratings

30%

8.9

Number of reviews

Based on 3,978 buyer reviews from online shops.
How we calculate this
User ratings – average star rating across all shop listings, weighted by how many reviews each has, on a 1–10 scale.
Number of reviews – how many buyer reviews the product has, on a logarithmic scale; the 8% most-reviewed models in the category get 10.
▲Better than 76% of fitness-trackers
  • xiaomi-mi-band-8
  • xiaomi-mi-band-8
  • xiaomi-mi-band-8
  • xiaomi-mi-band-8
xiaomi-mi-band-8
xiaomi-mi-band-8
xiaomi-mi-band-8
xiaomi-mi-band-8

Best prices

*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.

Best rankings

Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Loading...
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of fitness tracker Xiaomi Mi Band 8

Technical score
Technical score
8.9/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Fitness trackers category across these key areas: Health, Sports & Navigation, Smart Features, App & Wellness, Connectivity, Battery, Display, Design & Durability.
When it matters
When you want to compare fitness trackers based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

20%

9.2

Sports & Navigation

20%

8.3

Battery

18%

9.0

Health

18%

9.5

Display

8%

9.1

Smart Features

8%

9.2

App & Wellness

4%

8.2

Connectivity

4%

8.1

Design & Durability

8.9
User score
User score
8.4/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the fitness tracker.
When it matters
When you want to know how a fitness tracker performs in daily use and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

8.2

User ratings

30%

8.9

Number of reviews

Based on 3,978 buyer reviews from online shops.
How we calculate this
User ratings – average star rating across all shop listings, weighted by how many reviews each has, on a 1–10 scale.
Number of reviews – how many buyer reviews the product has, on a logarithmic scale; the 8% most-reviewed models in the category get 10.
8.4
Popularity
Popularity
8.9/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the fitness tracker.
When it matters
When you prefer to buy a product chosen and reviewed by many other consumers.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Popularity:
Xiaomi Mi Band 8 has a popularity score of 8.9 points, which is higher than 77% of fitness trackers.
8.9
Value for money
Value for money
9.2/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the fitness tracker's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a fitness tracker with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

60%

8.8

Overall score

40%

10

Price

9.2
Heart rate monitor
yes
Heart rate monitor
yes
This fitness tracker supports heart rate monitoring. 40.2% of fitness trackers support heart rate monitoring.
Resting heart rate
yes
Resting heart rate
yes
This fitness tracker supports Resting heart rate. 52.6% of fitness trackers support Resting heart rate.
Fast/slow heart rate alerts
yes
Fast/slow heart rate alerts
yes
This fitness tracker supports high and low heart rate alerts. 65.8% of fitness trackers support high and low heart rate alerts.
High and low heart rate alerts.
Irregular heart rate alerts
no
Irregular heart rate alerts
no
This fitness tracker does not support irregular heart rate alerts. 12.4% of fitness trackers support irregular heart rate alerts.
Blood oxygen sensor
yes
Blood oxygen sensor
yes
This fitness tracker has a blood oxygen sensor. 75.1% of fitness trackers have a blood oxygen sensor.
Show more
GPS
no
GPS
no
This fitness tracker does not have GPS. 11% of fitness trackers have GPS.
Satellite systems supported
no
Satellite systems supported
no
This fitness tracker supports no satellite systems which is less versatile than that of 12.2% of fitness trackers and the same as that of 87.8% of fitness trackers.
GNSS bands supported
no
GNSS bands supported
no
This fitness tracker does not support advanced GNSS bands. 8.9% of fitness trackers support advanced GNSS bands.
Galileo support
no
Galileo support
no
This fitness tracker does not support Galileo. 4.9% of fitness trackers support Galileo.
Acquires GPS faster
no
Acquires GPS faster
no
This fitness tracker does not support faster GPS acquisition. 8.1% of fitness trackers support faster GPS acquisition.
Show more
Notifications
yes
Notifications
yes
This fitness tracker supports notifications. 27.5% of fitness trackers support notifications.
Vibrating alerts
yes
Vibrating alerts
yes
This fitness tracker supports vibration alerts. 16.3% of fitness trackers support vibration alerts.
Call control
yes
Call control
yes
This fitness tracker supports call controls. 58.7% of fitness trackers support call controls.
Reject/mute plus quick replies.
Call answering
no
Call answering
no
This fitness tracker does not support call answering. 1% of fitness trackers support call answering.
Calendar sync
yes
Calendar sync
yes
This fitness tracker supports calendar sync. 80.2% of fitness trackers support calendar sync.
Shows synced events for the next 7 days.
Show more
Activity reports
yes
Activity reports
yes
This fitness tracker supports activity reports. 5.7% of fitness trackers support activity reports.
via Mi Fit app
Goal setting
yes
Goal setting
yes
This fitness tracker supports goal setting. 2.4% of fitness trackers support goal setting.
Achievements
yes
Achievements
yes
This fitness tracker supports achievements. 24.3% of fitness trackers support achievements.
Inactivity alerts
yes
Inactivity alerts
yes
This fitness tracker supports inactivity alerts. 23.5% of fitness trackers support inactivity alerts.
Coaching
yes
Coaching
yes
This fitness tracker supports coaching. 66.5% of fitness trackers support coaching.
Show more
Bluetooth version
5.1
Bluetooth version
5.1
This fitness tracker supports Bluetooth 5.1 which is newer than in 91.9% of fitness trackers and equal to that in 2% of fitness trackers.
Maximum Bluetooth range
10 m
Maximum Bluetooth range
10 m
This fitness tracker offers a Bluetooth range of 10 m which is higher than that of 14.9% of fitness trackers and equal to that of 63.4% of fitness trackers.
NFC
?
Wi-Fi connectivity
no
Wi-Fi connectivity
no
This fitness tracker does not support Wi-Fi. 1.8% of fitness trackers support Wi-Fi.
Wi-Fi version
no
Wi-Fi version
no
This fitness tracker does not support modern Wi-Fi. 1% of fitness trackers support modern Wi-Fi.
no Wi-Fi support.
Show more
Battery life
16 days
Battery life
16 days
This fitness tracker offers a battery life of 16 days which is longer than that of 75.7% of fitness trackers and equal to that of 0.5% of fitness trackers.
Battery life with GPS on
N/A
Battery life in training mode
?
Battery life in power-saving mode
?
Battery capacity
190 mAh
Battery capacity
190 mAh
This fitness tracker has a battery capacity of 190 mAh which is higher than that of 75% of fitness trackers and equal to that of 2.6% of fitness trackers.
Show more
Display
yes
Display
yes
This fitness tracker has a display. 24.1% of fitness trackers have a display.
Screen size
1.62 inch
Screen size
1.62 inch
This fitness tracker has a screen size of 1.62 inch which is larger than that of 90.9% of fitness trackers and equal to that of 2.1% of fitness trackers.
Display type
AMOLED
Display type
AMOLED
This fitness tracker uses AMOLED display technology which is more advanced than that of 74.9% of fitness trackers and the same as that of 25.1% of fitness trackers.
Screen resolution
192x 490
Screen resolution
192x 490
This fitness tracker has a screen resolution of 192x490 which is higher than that of 93.8% of fitness trackers and equal to that of 1.7% of fitness trackers.
Pixel density
326 ppi
Pixel density
326 ppi
This fitness tracker has a pixel density of 326 ppi which is higher than that of 86.1% of fitness trackers and equal to that of 12% of fitness trackers.
Show more
Form factor
wristband
Hybrid design
no
Hybrid design
no
This fitness tracker does not support Hybrid design. 2.4% of fitness trackers support Hybrid design.
Designed for kids
no
Designed for kids
no
This fitness tracker is not designed for kids. 2.4% of fitness trackers are designed for kids.
Replaceable watch band
yes
Replaceable watch band
yes
This fitness tracker has a replaceable watch band. 25.6% of fitness trackers have a replaceable watch band.
Band width
20 mm
Show more

Xiaomi Mi Band 8 vs the average fitness tracker

246810TotalHealthSports & NavigationBatteryDisplayConnectivitySmart FeaturesDesign & DurabilityApp & Wellness
  • 33.3% higher screen brightness
    Screen brightness
    600 nits
    This fitness tracker has a higher screen brightness than the average fitness tracker (600 nits vs 450 nits). The average fitness tracker has screen brightness of 450 nits.
    600 nits vs 450 nits
  • 6 days longer battery life
    Battery life
    16 days
    This fitness tracker has a higher battery life than the average fitness tracker (16 days vs 10 days). The average fitness tracker has 10 days of battery life.
    16 days vs 10 days
  • Blood oxygen monitoring
    Blood oxygen sensor
    yes
    This fitness tracker has a blood oxygen sensor, while the average fitness tracker does not. 25.2% of fitness trackers have a blood oxygen sensor.
  • Always-on display
    Always-on display
    yes
    This fitness tracker has an always-on display, while the average fitness tracker does not. 25.6% of fitness trackers have an always-on display.
  • Measures VO2 max
    VO2 max
    yes
    This fitness tracker supports VO2 max tracking, while the average fitness tracker does not. 21.8% of fitness trackers support VO2 max tracking.
  • Lower resting heart rate
    Resting heart rate
    yes
    This fitness tracker supports Resting heart rate, while the average fitness tracker does not. 47.7% of fitness trackers support Resting heart rate.
  • 0.58 inch larger screen size
    Screen size
    1.62 inch
    This fitness tracker has a higher screen size than the average fitness tracker (1.6 inch vs 1.04 inch). The average fitness tracker has a screen size of 1.04 inch.
    1.62 inch vs 1.04 inch
  • Touchscreen
    Touchscreen
    yes
    This fitness tracker has a touchscreen, while the average fitness tracker does not. 43.8% of fitness trackers have a touchscreen.
  • 16% better value for money
    Xiaomi Mi Band 8 has a higher value-for-money score than the average fitness tracker (9.19 vs 7.9).
    9.19 vs 7.92
  • 2.8x cheaper
    Xiaomi Mi Band 8 is cheaper than the average fitness tracker (£25 vs £70).
    £25 vs £70
  • 5% higher user score
    User score
    8.4/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the fitness tracker.
    When it matters
    When you want to know how a fitness tracker performs in daily use and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
    Score distribution
    ▼
    ▼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    Xiaomi Mi Band 8
    the average fitness tracker
    Xiaomi Mi Band 8 has a higher user score than the average fitness tracker (8.40 vs 8.000).
    8.4 vs 8
  • Blood oxygen monitoring
    Blood oxygen sensor
    yes
    This fitness tracker has a blood oxygen sensor, while the average fitness tracker does not. 25.2% of fitness trackers have a blood oxygen sensor.
  • Measures VO2 max
    VO2 max
    yes
    This fitness tracker supports VO2 max tracking, while the average fitness tracker does not. 21.8% of fitness trackers support VO2 max tracking.
  • Lower resting heart rate
    Resting heart rate
    yes
    This fitness tracker supports Resting heart rate, while the average fitness tracker does not. 47.7% of fitness trackers support Resting heart rate.
  • Heart rate alerts
    Fast/slow heart rate alerts
    yes
    This fitness tracker supports high and low heart rate alerts, while the average fitness tracker does not. 34.5% of fitness trackers support high and low heart rate alerts.
    High and low heart rate alerts.
  • Continuous SpO₂ monitoring
    Continuous SpO₂ monitoring
    yes
    This fitness tracker supports continuous SpO₂ monitoring, while the average fitness tracker does not. 12.3% of fitness trackers support continuous SpO₂ monitoring.
    24/7 monitoring.
  • Tracks menstrual cycle
    Menstrual cycle tracking
    yes
    This fitness tracker supports menstrual cycle tracking, while the average fitness tracker does not. 41.7% of fitness trackers support menstrual cycle tracking.
  • Period notifications
    Has period notifications
    yes
    This fitness tracker has period notifications, while the average fitness tracker does not. 31% of fitness trackers have period notifications.
  • Fertile window notifications
    Displays fertile window notifications
    yes
    This fitness tracker displays fertile window notifications, while the average fitness tracker does not. 24.1% of fitness trackers display fertile window notifications.
  • Ovulation prediction
    Predicts ovulation
    yes
    This fitness tracker predicts ovulation, while the average fitness tracker does not. 41.6% of fitness trackers predict ovulation.
  • Cycle start prediction
    Predicts start date
    yes
    This fitness tracker predicts the start date, while the average fitness tracker does not. 42.5% of fitness trackers predict the start date.
  • 6 days longer battery life
    Battery life
    16 days
    This fitness tracker has a higher battery life than the average fitness tracker (16 days vs 10 days). The average fitness tracker has 10 days of battery life.
    16 days vs 10 days
  • 0.5 hours shorter charging time
    Charging time
    1 hours
    This fitness tracker has a lower charging time than the average fitness tracker (1 hours vs 1.5 hours). The average fitness tracker needs 1.5 hours to charge.
    1 hours vs 1.5 hours
  • 72.7% larger battery capacity
    Battery capacity
    190 mAh
    This fitness tracker has a higher battery capacity than the average fitness tracker (190 mAh vs 110 mAh). The average fitness tracker has 110 mAh of battery capacity.
    190 mAh vs 110 mAh
  • Low power mode
    Low power mode
    yes
    This fitness tracker supports low power mode, while the average fitness tracker does not. 24.1% of fitness trackers support low power mode.
  • 33.3% higher screen brightness
    Screen brightness
    600 nits
    This fitness tracker has a higher screen brightness than the average fitness tracker (600 nits vs 450 nits). The average fitness tracker has screen brightness of 450 nits.
    600 nits vs 450 nits
  • Always-on display
    Always-on display
    yes
    This fitness tracker has an always-on display, while the average fitness tracker does not. 25.6% of fitness trackers have an always-on display.
  • 0.58 inch larger screen size
    Screen size
    1.62 inch
    This fitness tracker has a higher screen size than the average fitness tracker (1.6 inch vs 1.04 inch). The average fitness tracker has a screen size of 1.04 inch.
    1.62 inch vs 1.04 inch
  • Touchscreen
    Touchscreen
    yes
    This fitness tracker has a touchscreen, while the average fitness tracker does not. 43.8% of fitness trackers have a touchscreen.
  • 33.1% higher pixel density
    Pixel density
    326 ppi
    This fitness tracker has a higher pixel density than the average fitness tracker (326 ppi vs 245 ppi). The average fitness tracker has a pixel density of 245 ppi.
    326 ppi vs 245 ppi
  • Color display
    Color display
    yes
    This fitness tracker has a color display, while the average fitness tracker does not. 37.7% of fitness trackers have a color display.
  • Ambient light sensor
    Ambient light sensor
    yes
    This fitness tracker has an ambient light sensor, while the average fitness tracker does not. 16.7% of fitness trackers have an ambient light sensor.
  • Durable display glass
    Display glass type
    reinforced glass
    This fitness tracker uses more durable display glass than the average fitness tracker (reinforced glass vs glass). The average fitness tracker uses glass display glass.
    reinforced glass vs glass
  • Higher screen resolution
    Screen resolution
    192 x 490
    This fitness tracker has a higher screen resolution than the average fitness tracker (192x490 vs 194x368). The average fitness tracker has a screen resolution of 194x368.
    192x490 vs 194x368
  • Modern Bluetooth version
    Bluetooth version
    5.1
    This fitness tracker supports a newer Bluetooth version than the average fitness tracker (5.1 vs 4). The average fitness tracker supports Bluetooth 4.0.
    5.1 vs 4.0
  • Phone finder support
    Find my phone
    yes
    This fitness tracker supports phone finding, while the average fitness tracker does not. 49.3% of fitness trackers support phone finding.
  • Passcode protection
    Passcode protection
    yes
    This fitness tracker supports passcode protection, while the average fitness tracker does not. 17.6% of fitness trackers support passcode protection.
  • 4x larger internal storage
    Internal storage
    0.128 GB
    This fitness tracker has a higher internal storage than the average fitness tracker (0.1 GB vs 0 GB). The average fitness tracker has 0.032 GB of internal storage.
    0.128 GB vs 0.032 GB
  • Call control
    Call control
    yes
    This fitness tracker supports call controls, while the average fitness tracker does not. 41.5% of fitness trackers support call controls.
    Reject/mute plus quick replies.
  • Calendar sync
    Calendar sync
    yes
    This fitness tracker supports calendar sync, while the average fitness tracker does not. 20.2% of fitness trackers support calendar sync.
    Shows synced events for the next 7 days.
  • Camera remote control
    Camera remote control
    yes
    This fitness tracker supports camera remote control, while the average fitness tracker does not. 38.9% of fitness trackers support camera remote control.
    Requires Mi Fitness app pairing.
  • Gesture control
    Gesture control
    yes
    This fitness tracker supports gesture controls, while the average fitness tracker does not. 40.8% of fitness trackers support gesture controls.
  • 7 newer release date
    Release date
    2023
    This fitness tracker was released more recently than the average fitness tracker (2023 vs 2016). The average fitness tracker was released in 2016.
    April 2023
    2023 vs 2016
  • Coaching features
    Coaching
    yes
    This fitness tracker supports coaching, while the average fitness tracker does not. 33.8% of fitness trackers support coaching.
  • Points-based system
    Points-based system
    yes
    This fitness tracker supports a points-based system, while the average fitness tracker does not. 38.6% of fitness trackers support a points-based system.
    Uses PAI.
  • Not compatible with smart scales
    Compatible with smart scales
    no
    This fitness tracker is not compatible with smart scales, while the average fitness tracker is. 68.1% of fitness trackers are compatible with smart scales.
  • 8% heavier
    Thickness
    27 g mm
    This fitness tracker is heavier than the average fitness tracker (27 g vs 25 g). The average fitness tracker weighs 25 g.
    27 g vs 25 g
  • 7.2 mm greater height
    Height
    48 mm
    This fitness tracker is taller than the average fitness tracker (48 mm vs 40.8 mm). The average fitness tracker has a height of 40.8 mm.
    48 mm vs 40.8 mm
  • 8% heavier
    Thickness
    27 g mm
    This fitness tracker is heavier than the average fitness tracker (27 g vs 25 g). The average fitness tracker weighs 25 g.
    27 g vs 25 g
  • 7.2 mm greater height
    Height
    48 mm
    This fitness tracker is taller than the average fitness tracker (48 mm vs 40.8 mm). The average fitness tracker has a height of 40.8 mm.
    48 mm vs 40.8 mm
  • Not compatible with smart scales
    Compatible with smart scales
    no
    This fitness tracker is not compatible with smart scales, while the average fitness tracker is. 68.1% of fitness trackers are compatible with smart scales.

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

1
1side0.net
06/12/2023
Summary of the review
N
niuxtech.lt
11/12/2023
Summary of the review
T
trustedreviews.com
27/11/2023
Summary of the review
A
androidpolice.com
09/02/2024
Summary of the review
T
techadvisor.com
31/01/2024
Summary of the review
W
wareable.com
16/10/2023
Summary of the review
S
smartdroid.de
27/04/2023
Summary of the review
N
nextpit.de
08/10/2023
Summary of the review
F
fitforfun.de
05/06/2024
Summary of the review
S
smartzone.de
17/05/2023
Summary of the review
T
test.de
16/02/2024
Summary of the review
C
computerbild.de
19/12/2023
Summary of the review
N
notebookcheck.com
22/12/2023
Summary of the review
C
chip.de
28/11/2023
Summary of the review
F
faz.net
03/04/2026
Summary of the review
C
chip.de
24/11/2023
Summary of the review
L
lesnumeriques.com
05/12/2023
Summary of the review
F
frandroid.com
24/06/2025
Summary of the review
L
lemon.fr
01/11/2023
Summary of the review
N
nextpit.fr
11/08/2023
Summary of the review
L
leclaireur.fnac.com
16/01/2024
Summary of the review
0
01net.com
04/12/2023
Summary of the review
C
clubic.com
05/12/2023
Summary of the review
2
20minutos.es
08/11/2023
Summary of the review
R
robadainformatici.it
28/10/2025
Summary of the review
T
techprincess.it
14/11/2023
Summary of the review
A
andreagaleazzi.com
08/11/2023
Summary of the review
X
xiaomitoday.it
24/06/2023
Summary of the review
T
tomshw.it
10/11/2023
Summary of the review
A
androidworld.nl
20/11/2023
Summary of the review

Third-party reviews

Based on 3,978 buyer reviews from online shops.
Reviews last updated: June 2026 · How we calculate this

What we like about Xiaomi Mi Band 8

  • Exceptional value for money with a highly affordable price point.
  • Smooth and responsive 60Hz AMOLED display with improved 600 nits brightness.
  • Long-lasting battery life, reaching up to 16 days with light usage or roughly 5-6 days with all features enabled.
  • Enhanced design with a more premium metal frame and versatile quick-release strap system.
  • Fast charging capabilities, capable of reaching a full charge in approximately 45–60 minutes.
  • Pebble Mode provides unique, advanced running metrics when clipped to footwear.

What we don't like about Xiaomi Mi Band 8

  • Lack of built-in GPS requires a constant connection to a smartphone for outdoor route tracking.
  • Fitness and health tracking accuracy can be inconsistent, particularly for heart rate and calorie burn.
  • Missing smart features on the global edition, such as NFC for contactless payments and voice assistants.
  • Many health and sleep tracking features are disabled by default, requiring manual setup in the app.
  • Notifications are for viewing only, with no ability to reply directly from the band.
  • Mi Fitness app can be buggy, with occasional sync issues or limited data analysis.

Verdict

The Xiaomi Mi Band 8 is a versatile fitness tracker featuring a 1.62-inch AMOLED touch display with a smooth 60Hz refresh rate, 326 PPI resolution, and up to 600 nits of auto-adjustable brightness. Encased in a sleek metallic midframe, it supports over 150 sports modes, including a unique 'Pebble Mode' for advanced running metrics when clipped to shoes, alongside 24/7 heart rate, SpO2, sleep, and stress monitoring. Key advantages include an impressive battery life of up to 16 days (or 6 days with Always-on Display), 5ATM water resistance, and a new quick-release strap system that allows it to be worn as a pendant. However, notable drawbacks include the lack of built-in GPS, the absence of a physical home button for navigation, and no NFC support in the global version.

Compare Xiaomi Mi Band 8 with other products in the Fitness trackers category

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Xiaomi Mi Band 8 and other products in the Fitness trackers category

No results found