OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS
Scored using Fitness trackers Methodology v1.0
Fitness trackers Methodology v1.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are evaluated mathematically under Frontumo Fitness trackers Methodology v1.0 using verified laboratory benchmarks, technical specifications, and authentic consumer ratings with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Fitness trackers Methodology v1.0

Fastrack Reflex 3 0 Review | 171 Data compared

Avg. price:~£25Battery life:10 daysScreen size:0.96 inchHeart rate monitor:yesGPS:noWaterproof depth rating:1.5 m

Fastrack Reflex 3 0 Review: Compare 171 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Fitness trackers category and whether it is worth buying.

7.1

Overall score

Score
7.1/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the fitness tracker's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best fitness trackers on the market.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 55% of models
Score components

80%

7.1

Technical score

20%

7.1

User score

â–²Better than 55% of fitness-trackers
7.1

Technical score

Technical score
7.1/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Fitness trackers category across these key areas: Health, Sports & Navigation, Smart Features, App & Wellness, Connectivity, Battery, Display, Design & Durability.
When it matters
When you want to compare fitness trackers based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 58% of models
Score components

20%

8.3

Sports & Navigation

20%

5.6

Battery

18%

7.4

Health

18%

6.5

Display

8%

7.8

Smart Features

8%

7.5

App & Wellness

4%

8.0

Connectivity

4%

7.7

Design & Durability

â–²Better than 58% of fitness-trackers
7.1

User score

User score
7.1/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the fitness tracker.
When it matters
When you want to know how a fitness tracker performs in daily use and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 82% of models
Score components

70%

7.8

User ratings

30%

5.6

Number of reviews

Based on 121 buyer reviews from online shops.
Read buyer reviews on Amazon →
How we calculate this
User ratings – average star rating across all shop listings, weighted by how many reviews each has, on a 1–10 scale.
Number of reviews – how many buyer reviews the product has, on a logarithmic scale; the 8% most-reviewed models in the category get 10.
â–¼Worse than 82% of fitness-trackers
  • fastrack-reflex-3-0
  • fastrack-reflex-3-0
  • fastrack-reflex-3-0
  • fastrack-reflex-3-0
  • fastrack-reflex-3-0
fastrack-reflex-3-0
fastrack-reflex-3-0
fastrack-reflex-3-0
fastrack-reflex-3-0
fastrack-reflex-3-0

Best prices

*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.

Best rankings

Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of fitness tracker Fastrack Reflex 3 0

Technical score
Technical score
7.1/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Fitness trackers category across these key areas: Health, Sports & Navigation, Smart Features, App & Wellness, Connectivity, Battery, Display, Design & Durability.
When it matters
When you want to compare fitness trackers based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 58% of models
Score components:

20%

8.3

Sports & Navigation

20%

5.6

Battery

18%

7.4

Health

18%

6.5

Display

8%

7.8

Smart Features

8%

7.5

App & Wellness

4%

8.0

Connectivity

4%

7.7

Design & Durability

7.1
User score
User score
7.1/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the fitness tracker.
When it matters
When you want to know how a fitness tracker performs in daily use and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 82% of models
Score components

70%

7.8

User ratings

30%

5.6

Number of reviews

Based on 121 buyer reviews from online shops.
Read buyer reviews on Amazon →
How we calculate this
User ratings – average star rating across all shop listings, weighted by how many reviews each has, on a 1–10 scale.
Number of reviews – how many buyer reviews the product has, on a logarithmic scale; the 8% most-reviewed models in the category get 10.
7.1
Popularity
Popularity
5.6/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the fitness tracker.
When it matters
When you prefer to buy a product chosen and reviewed by many other consumers.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 55% of models
Popularity:
Fastrack Reflex 3 0 has a popularity score of 5.6 points, which is higher than 55.4% of fitness trackers.
5.6
Value for money
Value for money
8.0/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the fitness tracker's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a fitness tracker with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 54% of models
Score components:

60%

7.1

Overall score

40%

10

Price

8.0
Heart rate monitor
yes
Heart rate monitor
yes
â–² Better than 40% of models
This fitness tracker supports heart rate monitoring. 40.2% of fitness trackers support heart rate monitoring.
Resting heart rate
?
Fast/slow heart rate alerts
no
Fast/slow heart rate alerts
no
â–¼ Worse than 35% of models
This fitness tracker does not support high and low heart rate alerts. 34.7% of fitness trackers support high and low heart rate alerts.
Irregular heart rate alerts
?
Blood oxygen sensor
no
Blood oxygen sensor
no
â–¼ Worse than 25% of models
This fitness tracker does not have a blood oxygen sensor. 25.4% of fitness trackers have a blood oxygen sensor.
Show more
GPS
no
GPS
no
â–¼ Worse than 11% of models
This fitness tracker does not have GPS. 11% of fitness trackers have GPS.
Satellite systems supported
no
Satellite systems supported
no
â–¼ Worse than 12% of models
This fitness tracker supports no satellite systems which is less versatile than that of 12.2% of fitness trackers and the same as that of 87.8% of fitness trackers.
no satellite positioning support.
GNSS bands supported
no
GNSS bands supported
no
â–¼ Worse than 9% of models
This fitness tracker does not support advanced GNSS bands. 8.9% of fitness trackers support advanced GNSS bands.
Galileo support
no
Galileo support
no
â–¼ Worse than 5% of models
This fitness tracker does not support Galileo. 4.9% of fitness trackers support Galileo.
Acquires GPS faster
no
Acquires GPS faster
no
â–¼ Worse than 8% of models
This fitness tracker does not support faster GPS acquisition. 8.1% of fitness trackers support faster GPS acquisition.
Show more
Notifications
yes
Notifications
yes
â–² Better than 28% of models
This fitness tracker supports notifications. 27.5% of fitness trackers support notifications.
Vibrating alerts
yes
Vibrating alerts
yes
â–² Better than 16% of models
This fitness tracker supports vibration alerts. 16.3% of fitness trackers support vibration alerts.
Call control
yes
Call control
yes
â–² Better than 59% of models
This fitness tracker supports call controls. 58.7% of fitness trackers support call controls.
Reject/mute only.
Call answering
no
Call answering
no
â–¼ Worse than 1% of models
This fitness tracker does not support call answering. 1% of fitness trackers support call answering.
Calendar sync
no
Calendar sync
no
â–¼ Worse than 20% of models
This fitness tracker does not support calendar sync. 20.3% of fitness trackers support calendar sync.
Show more
Activity reports
yes
Activity reports
yes
â–² Better than 6% of models
This fitness tracker supports activity reports. 5.7% of fitness trackers support activity reports.
Goal setting
yes
Goal setting
yes
â–² Better than 2% of models
This fitness tracker supports goal setting. 2.4% of fitness trackers support goal setting.
Achievements
?
Inactivity alerts
yes
Inactivity alerts
yes
â–² Better than 24% of models
This fitness tracker supports inactivity alerts. 23.5% of fitness trackers support inactivity alerts.
Coaching
no
Coaching
no
â–¼ Worse than 34% of models
This fitness tracker does not support coaching. 34% of fitness trackers support coaching.
Show more
Bluetooth version
5
Bluetooth version
5
â–² Better than 75% of models
This fitness tracker supports Bluetooth 5 which is newer than in 74.6% of fitness trackers and equal to that in 16.8% of fitness trackers.
Maximum Bluetooth range
10 m
Maximum Bluetooth range
10 m
â–¼ Worse than 22% of models
Market range: <8 m – >23 m
This fitness tracker offers a Bluetooth range of 10 m which is higher than that of 14.9% of fitness trackers and equal to that of 63.4% of fitness trackers.
NFC
no
NFC
no
â–¼ Worse than 13% of models
This fitness tracker does not have NFC. 13% of fitness trackers have NFC.
Wi-Fi connectivity
?
Wi-Fi version
no
Wi-Fi version
no
â–¼ Worse than 1% of models
This fitness tracker does not support modern Wi-Fi. 1% of fitness trackers support modern Wi-Fi.
no Wi-Fi support.
Show more
Battery life
10 days
Battery life
10 days
â–² Better than 50% of models
Market range: <5 days – >180 days
This fitness tracker offers a battery life of 10 days which is longer than that of 50% of fitness trackers and equal to that of 4.5% of fitness trackers.
Battery life with GPS on
N/A
Battery life in training mode
?
Battery life in power-saving mode
?
Battery capacity
90 mAh
Battery capacity
90 mAh
â–¼ Worse than 66% of models
Market range: <30 mAh – >225 mAh
This fitness tracker has a battery capacity of 90 mAh which is lower than that of 66.5% of fitness trackers and equal to that of 4.6% of fitness trackers.
Show more
Display
yes
Display
yes
â–² Better than 24% of models
This fitness tracker has a display. 24.1% of fitness trackers have a display.
Screen size
0.96 inch
Screen size
0.96 inch
â–¼ Worse than 54% of models
Market range: <0 inch – >1.6 inch
This fitness tracker has a screen size of 0.96 inch which is smaller than that of 53.9% of fitness trackers and equal to that of 9.1% of fitness trackers.
Display type
TFT LCD
Display type
TFT LCD
â–¼ Worse than 62% of models
This fitness tracker uses TFT LCD display technology which is less advanced than that of 62.1% of fitness trackers and the same as that of 5.6% of fitness trackers.
Screen resolution
80x 160
Screen resolution
80x 160
â–² Better than 62% of models
This fitness tracker has a screen resolution of 80x160 which is higher than that of 61.9% of fitness trackers and equal to that of 2.3% of fitness trackers.
Pixel density
186 ppi
Pixel density
186 ppi
â–¼ Worse than 70% of models
Market range: <140 ppi – >330 ppi
This fitness tracker has a pixel density of 186 ppi which is lower than that of 70.4% of fitness trackers and equal to that of 3.7% of fitness trackers.
Show more
Form factor
wristband
Hybrid design
no
Hybrid design
no
â–¼ Worse than 2% of models
This fitness tracker does not support Hybrid design. 2.4% of fitness trackers support Hybrid design.
Designed for kids
no
Designed for kids
no
â–¼ Worse than 2% of models
This fitness tracker is not designed for kids. 2.4% of fitness trackers are designed for kids.
Replaceable watch band
yes
Replaceable watch band
yes
â–² Better than 26% of models
This fitness tracker has a replaceable watch band. 25.6% of fitness trackers have a replaceable watch band.
Quick-release band system.
Band width
18.5 mm
Show more

Fastrack Reflex 3 0 vs the average fitness tracker

246810TotalHealthSports & NavigationBatteryDisplayConnectivitySmart FeaturesDesign & DurabilityApp & Wellness
  • Touchscreen
    Touchscreen
    yes
    â–² Better than 56% of models
    This fitness tracker has a touchscreen, while the average fitness tracker does not. 43.8% of fitness trackers have a touchscreen.
  • Phone finder support
    Find my phone
    yes
    â–² Better than 51% of models
    This fitness tracker supports phone finding, while the average fitness tracker does not. 49.3% of fitness trackers support phone finding.
    Requires paired connection.
  • Color display
    Color display
    yes
    â–² Better than 63% of models
    This fitness tracker has a color display, while the average fitness tracker does not. 37.7% of fitness trackers have a color display.
  • Tracks menstrual cycle
    Menstrual cycle tracking
    yes
    â–² Better than 59% of models
    This fitness tracker supports menstrual cycle tracking, while the average fitness tracker does not. 41.7% of fitness trackers support menstrual cycle tracking.
  • Modern Bluetooth version
    Bluetooth version
    5.0
    â–² Better than 75% of models
    This fitness tracker supports a newer Bluetooth version than the average fitness tracker (5 vs 4). The average fitness tracker supports Bluetooth 4.0.
    5.0 vs 4.0
  • Built-in gyroscope
    Gyroscope
    yes
    â–² Better than 74% of models
    This fitness tracker has a gyroscope, while the average fitness tracker does not. 26.5% of fitness trackers have a gyroscope.
  • Call control
    Call control
    yes
    â–² Better than 59% of models
    This fitness tracker supports call controls, while the average fitness tracker does not. 41.5% of fitness trackers support call controls.
    Reject/mute only.
  • 28% lighter
    Thickness
    18 g mm
    â–² Better than 47% of models
    Market range: <8 mm – >13 mm
    This fitness tracker is lighter than the average fitness tracker (18 g vs 25 g). The average fitness tracker weighs 25 g.
    18 g vs 25 g
  • 2.8x cheaper
    Fastrack Reflex 3 0 is cheaper than the average fitness tracker (£25 vs £70).
    £25 vs £70
  • Tracks menstrual cycle
    Menstrual cycle tracking
    yes
    â–² Better than 59% of models
    This fitness tracker supports menstrual cycle tracking, while the average fitness tracker does not. 41.7% of fitness trackers support menstrual cycle tracking.
  • Touchscreen
    Touchscreen
    yes
    â–² Better than 56% of models
    This fitness tracker has a touchscreen, while the average fitness tracker does not. 43.8% of fitness trackers have a touchscreen.
  • Color display
    Color display
    yes
    â–² Better than 63% of models
    This fitness tracker has a color display, while the average fitness tracker does not. 37.7% of fitness trackers have a color display.
  • Modern Bluetooth version
    Bluetooth version
    5.0
    â–² Better than 75% of models
    This fitness tracker supports a newer Bluetooth version than the average fitness tracker (5 vs 4). The average fitness tracker supports Bluetooth 4.0.
    5.0 vs 4.0
  • Phone finder support
    Find my phone
    yes
    â–² Better than 51% of models
    This fitness tracker supports phone finding, while the average fitness tracker does not. 49.3% of fitness trackers support phone finding.
    Requires paired connection.
  • Call control
    Call control
    yes
    â–² Better than 59% of models
    This fitness tracker supports call controls, while the average fitness tracker does not. 41.5% of fitness trackers support call controls.
    Reject/mute only.
  • Camera remote control
    Camera remote control
    yes
    â–² Better than 61% of models
    This fitness tracker supports camera remote control, while the average fitness tracker does not. 38.9% of fitness trackers support camera remote control.
  • Gesture control
    Gesture control
    yes
    â–² Better than 60% of models
    This fitness tracker supports gesture controls, while the average fitness tracker does not. 40.8% of fitness trackers support gesture controls.
  • 28% lighter
    Thickness
    18 g mm
    â–² Better than 47% of models
    Market range: <8 mm – >13 mm
    This fitness tracker is lighter than the average fitness tracker (18 g vs 25 g). The average fitness tracker weighs 25 g.
    18 g vs 25 g
  • Water intake tracking
    Water intake tracking
    yes
    â–² Better than 58% of models
    This fitness tracker supports water intake tracking, while the average fitness tracker does not. 42% of fitness trackers support water intake tracking.
    Includes hydration reminders.
  • Lower screen resolution
    Screen resolution
    80 x 160
    â–² Better than 62% of models
    This fitness tracker has a lower screen resolution than the average fitness tracker (80x160 vs 194x368). The average fitness tracker has a screen resolution of 194x368.
    80x160 vs 194x368
  • 48.5 m lower waterproof depth rating
    Waterproof depth rating
    1.5 m
    â–¼ Worse than 73% of models
    Market range: <0 m – >50 m
    This fitness tracker has a lower waterproof depth rating than the average fitness tracker (1.5 m vs 50 m). The average fitness tracker has a waterproof depth rating of 50 m.
    1.5 m vs 50 m
  • No weight tracking
    Weight tracking
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 81% of models
    This fitness tracker does not support weight tracking, while the average fitness tracker does. 81% of fitness trackers support weight tracking.
  • No personalization options
    Can be personalised
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 80% of models
    This fitness tracker cannot be personalized, while the average fitness tracker can. 79.9% of fitness trackers can be personalized.
  • 24.1% lower pixel density
    Pixel density
    186 ppi
    â–¼ Worse than 70% of models
    Market range: <140 ppi – >330 ppi
    This fitness tracker has a lower pixel density than the average fitness tracker (186 ppi vs 245 ppi). The average fitness tracker has a pixel density of 245 ppi.
    186 ppi vs 245 ppi
  • 18.2% smaller battery capacity
    Battery capacity
    90 mAh
    â–¼ Worse than 66% of models
    Market range: <30 mAh – >225 mAh
    This fitness tracker has a lower battery capacity than the average fitness tracker (90 mAh vs 110 mAh). The average fitness tracker has 110 mAh of battery capacity.
    90 mAh vs 110 mAh
  • Not compatible with smart scales
    Compatible with smart scales
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 68% of models
    This fitness tracker is not compatible with smart scales, while the average fitness tracker is. 68.1% of fitness trackers are compatible with smart scales.
  • 0.08 inch smaller screen size
    Screen size
    0.96 inch
    â–¼ Worse than 54% of models
    Market range: <0 inch – >1.6 inch
    This fitness tracker has a lower screen size than the average fitness tracker (1 inch vs 1.04 inch). The average fitness tracker has a screen size of 1.04 inch.
    0.96 inch vs 1.04 inch
  • 12.2% lower user score
    User score
    7.1/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the fitness tracker.
    When it matters
    When you want to know how a fitness tracker performs in daily use and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
    Score distribution
    ▼▼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    Fastrack Reflex 3 0
    the average fitness tracker
    Fastrack Reflex 3 0 has a lower user score than the average fitness tracker (7.13 vs 8.000).
    7.13 vs 8
  • 18.2% smaller battery capacity
    Battery capacity
    90 mAh
    â–¼ Worse than 66% of models
    Market range: <30 mAh – >225 mAh
    This fitness tracker has a lower battery capacity than the average fitness tracker (90 mAh vs 110 mAh). The average fitness tracker has 110 mAh of battery capacity.
    90 mAh vs 110 mAh
  • Lower screen resolution
    Screen resolution
    80 x 160
    â–² Better than 62% of models
    This fitness tracker has a lower screen resolution than the average fitness tracker (80x160 vs 194x368). The average fitness tracker has a screen resolution of 194x368.
    80x160 vs 194x368
  • 24.1% lower pixel density
    Pixel density
    186 ppi
    â–¼ Worse than 70% of models
    Market range: <140 ppi – >330 ppi
    This fitness tracker has a lower pixel density than the average fitness tracker (186 ppi vs 245 ppi). The average fitness tracker has a pixel density of 245 ppi.
    186 ppi vs 245 ppi
  • 0.08 inch smaller screen size
    Screen size
    0.96 inch
    â–¼ Worse than 54% of models
    Market range: <0 inch – >1.6 inch
    This fitness tracker has a lower screen size than the average fitness tracker (1 inch vs 1.04 inch). The average fitness tracker has a screen size of 1.04 inch.
    0.96 inch vs 1.04 inch
  • 96.8% lower RAM capacity
    RAM capacity
    0.000064 GB
    â–¼ Worse than 42% of models
    Market range: <0.5 GB – >2 GB
    This fitness tracker has a lower RAM capacity than the average fitness tracker (0 GB vs 0 GB). The average fitness tracker has 0.002 GB of RAM capacity.
    Converted from 64 KB to GB.
    0.000064 GB vs 0.002 GB
  • 48.5 m lower waterproof depth rating
    Waterproof depth rating
    1.5 m
    â–¼ Worse than 73% of models
    Market range: <0 m – >50 m
    This fitness tracker has a lower waterproof depth rating than the average fitness tracker (1.5 m vs 50 m). The average fitness tracker has a waterproof depth rating of 50 m.
    1.5 m vs 50 m
  • 4.6 mm greater height
    Height
    45.4 mm
    â–¼ Worse than 76% of models
    Market range: <10 mm – >50 mm
    This fitness tracker is taller than the average fitness tracker (45.4 mm vs 40.8 mm). The average fitness tracker has a height of 40.8 mm.
    45.4 mm vs 40.8 mm
  • No weight tracking
    Weight tracking
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 81% of models
    This fitness tracker does not support weight tracking, while the average fitness tracker does. 81% of fitness trackers support weight tracking.
  • No personalization options
    Can be personalised
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 80% of models
    This fitness tracker cannot be personalized, while the average fitness tracker can. 79.9% of fitness trackers can be personalized.
  • Not compatible with smart scales
    Compatible with smart scales
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 68% of models
    This fitness tracker is not compatible with smart scales, while the average fitness tracker is. 68.1% of fitness trackers are compatible with smart scales.

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

Third-party reviews

Based on 121 buyer reviews from online shops.
Reviews last updated: June 2026 · How we calculate this
Read buyer reviews on Amazon →

What we like about Fastrack Reflex 3 0

  • Stylish and modern design with attractive dual-tone color options
  • Accurate tracking for core features like step counting and heart rate
  • Offers a variety of 10+ sports modes, including yoga, hiking, and cycling
  • Lightweight and comfortable silicone strap suitable for long-term wear
  • IP68 water resistance makes it durable for heavy rain or workouts
  • Competitive entry-level pricing considered 'pocket-friendly' by some users

What we don't like about Fastrack Reflex 3 0

  • Battery life frequently falls short of the claimed 10 days, with some users reporting only 1-day life
  • Touchscreen responsiveness is often sluggish or inconsistent
  • One-point sensing navigation is not intuitive or user-friendly
  • The home button is hidden under the display without any physical marking
  • Frequent Bluetooth connection and data syncing issues with the companion app
  • Lack of advanced health metrics like SpO2 (blood oxygen) monitoring

Verdict

The Fastrack Reflex 3.0 is a budget-friendly fitness tracker featuring a 0.96-inch rectangular TFT-LCD color touchscreen with an 80 x 160 pixel resolution and IP68 water resistance. Key characteristics include 10+ sports modes, 24/7 heart rate monitoring, sleep tracking, a sedentary alert, and smart features like music/camera control and phone finder via Bluetooth 5.0. Main pros are its lightweight 24g design, stylish dual-tone silicone straps, and a 90mAh battery offering up to 10 days of life on a 90-minute charge. However, notable cons include the lack of built-in GPS, an unmarked 'home' button below the display that can be confusing for new users, and reports of inconsistent step counting accuracy.

Compare Fastrack Reflex 3 0 with other products in the Fitness trackers category

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Fastrack Reflex 3 0 and other products in the Fitness trackers category

No results found