Scored using Fitness trackers Methodology v1.0
Fitness trackers Methodology v1.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are evaluated mathematically under Frontumo Fitness trackers Methodology v1.0 using verified laboratory benchmarks, technical specifications, and authentic consumer ratings with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Fitness trackers Methodology v1.0

Xiaomi Mi Band 5 Review | 171 Data compared

Avg. price:~£35Battery life:14 daysScreen size:1.1 inchHeart rate monitor:yesGPS:noWaterproof depth rating:50 m

Xiaomi Mi Band 5 Review: Compare 171 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Fitness trackers category and whether it is worth buying.

8.1

Overall score

Score
8.1/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the fitness tracker's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best fitness trackers on the market.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

80%

7.8

Technical score

20%

9.2

User score

â–²Better than 85% of fitness-trackers
7.8

Technical score

Technical score
7.8/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Fitness trackers category across these key areas: Health, Sports & Navigation, Smart Features, App & Wellness, Connectivity, Battery, Display, Design & Durability.
When it matters
When you want to compare fitness trackers based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

20%

9.0

Sports & Navigation

20%

6.5

Battery

18%

7.8

Health

18%

7.2

Display

8%

7.6

Smart Features

8%

9.1

App & Wellness

4%

8.3

Connectivity

4%

8.2

Design & Durability

â–²Better than 80% of fitness-trackers
9.2

User score

User score
9.2/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the fitness tracker.
When it matters
When you want to know how a fitness tracker performs in daily use and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

9.0

User ratings

30%

9.7

Number of reviews

Based on 9,691 buyer reviews from online shops.
How we calculate this
User ratings – average star rating across all shop listings, weighted by how many reviews each has, on a 1–10 scale.
Number of reviews – how many buyer reviews the product has, on a logarithmic scale; the 8% most-reviewed models in the category get 10.
★Better than 97% of fitness-trackers
  • xiaomi-mi-band-5
  • xiaomi-mi-band-5
  • xiaomi-mi-band-5
xiaomi-mi-band-5
xiaomi-mi-band-5
xiaomi-mi-band-5

Best prices

*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.

Best rankings

Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Loading...
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of fitness tracker Xiaomi Mi Band 5

Technical score
Technical score
7.8/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Fitness trackers category across these key areas: Health, Sports & Navigation, Smart Features, App & Wellness, Connectivity, Battery, Display, Design & Durability.
When it matters
When you want to compare fitness trackers based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

20%

9.0

Sports & Navigation

20%

6.5

Battery

18%

7.8

Health

18%

7.2

Display

8%

7.6

Smart Features

8%

9.1

App & Wellness

4%

8.3

Connectivity

4%

8.2

Design & Durability

7.8
User score
User score
9.2/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the fitness tracker.
When it matters
When you want to know how a fitness tracker performs in daily use and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

9.0

User ratings

30%

9.7

Number of reviews

Based on 9,691 buyer reviews from online shops.
How we calculate this
User ratings – average star rating across all shop listings, weighted by how many reviews each has, on a 1–10 scale.
Number of reviews – how many buyer reviews the product has, on a logarithmic scale; the 8% most-reviewed models in the category get 10.
9.2
Popularity
Popularity
9.7/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the fitness tracker.
When it matters
When you prefer to buy a product chosen and reviewed by many other consumers.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Popularity:
Xiaomi Mi Band 5 has a popularity score of 9.7 points, which is higher than 87.3% of fitness trackers.
9.7
Value for money
Value for money
8.7/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the fitness tracker's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a fitness tracker with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

60%

8.1

Overall score

40%

10

Price

8.7
Heart rate monitor
yes
Heart rate monitor
yes
This fitness tracker supports heart rate monitoring. 40.2% of fitness trackers support heart rate monitoring.
Resting heart rate
yes
Resting heart rate
yes
This fitness tracker supports Resting heart rate. 52.6% of fitness trackers support Resting heart rate.
Fast/slow heart rate alerts
yes
Fast/slow heart rate alerts
yes
This fitness tracker supports high and low heart rate alerts. 65.8% of fitness trackers support high and low heart rate alerts.
High heart rate alert only.
Irregular heart rate alerts
no
Irregular heart rate alerts
no
This fitness tracker does not support irregular heart rate alerts. 12.4% of fitness trackers support irregular heart rate alerts.
Blood oxygen sensor
no
Blood oxygen sensor
no
This fitness tracker does not have a blood oxygen sensor. 25.4% of fitness trackers have a blood oxygen sensor.
Show more
GPS
no
GPS
no
This fitness tracker does not have GPS. 11% of fitness trackers have GPS.
Satellite systems supported
no
Satellite systems supported
no
This fitness tracker supports no satellite systems which is less versatile than that of 12.2% of fitness trackers and the same as that of 87.8% of fitness trackers.
no satellite positioning support.
GNSS bands supported
no
GNSS bands supported
no
This fitness tracker does not support advanced GNSS bands. 8.9% of fitness trackers support advanced GNSS bands.
Galileo support
no
Galileo support
no
This fitness tracker does not support Galileo. 4.9% of fitness trackers support Galileo.
Acquires GPS faster
no
Acquires GPS faster
no
This fitness tracker does not support faster GPS acquisition. 8.1% of fitness trackers support faster GPS acquisition.
Show more
Notifications
yes
Notifications
yes
This fitness tracker supports notifications. 27.5% of fitness trackers support notifications.
Vibrating alerts
yes
Vibrating alerts
yes
This fitness tracker supports vibration alerts. 16.3% of fitness trackers support vibration alerts.
Call control
yes
Call control
yes
This fitness tracker supports call controls. 58.7% of fitness trackers support call controls.
Reject/mute only.
Call answering
no
Call answering
no
This fitness tracker does not support call answering. 1% of fitness trackers support call answering.
Calendar sync
no
Calendar sync
no
This fitness tracker does not support calendar sync. 20.3% of fitness trackers support calendar sync.
Show more
Activity reports
yes
Activity reports
yes
This fitness tracker supports activity reports. 5.7% of fitness trackers support activity reports.
Goal setting
yes
Goal setting
yes
This fitness tracker supports goal setting. 2.4% of fitness trackers support goal setting.
Achievements
no
Achievements
no
This fitness tracker does not support achievements. 76.2% of fitness trackers support achievements.
Inactivity alerts
yes
Inactivity alerts
yes
This fitness tracker supports inactivity alerts. 23.5% of fitness trackers support inactivity alerts.
Coaching
?
Show more
Bluetooth version
5
Bluetooth version
5
This fitness tracker supports Bluetooth 5 which is newer than in 74.6% of fitness trackers and equal to that in 16.8% of fitness trackers.
Maximum Bluetooth range
10 m
Maximum Bluetooth range
10 m
This fitness tracker offers a Bluetooth range of 10 m which is higher than that of 14.9% of fitness trackers and equal to that of 63.4% of fitness trackers.
NFC
?
Wi-Fi connectivity
no
Wi-Fi connectivity
no
This fitness tracker does not support Wi-Fi. 1.8% of fitness trackers support Wi-Fi.
no Wi-Fi connectivity.
Wi-Fi version
no
Wi-Fi version
no
This fitness tracker does not support modern Wi-Fi. 1% of fitness trackers support modern Wi-Fi.
no Wi-Fi support.
Show more
Battery life
14 days
Battery life
14 days
This fitness tracker offers a battery life of 14 days which is longer than that of 60.4% of fitness trackers and equal to that of 13.9% of fitness trackers.
Longer in saver mode
Battery life with GPS on
N/A
Battery life in training mode
?
Battery life in power-saving mode
?
Battery capacity
125 mAh
Battery capacity
125 mAh
This fitness tracker has a battery capacity of 125 mAh which is higher than that of 54% of fitness trackers and equal to that of 2% of fitness trackers.
Show more
Display
yes
Display
yes
This fitness tracker has a display. 24.1% of fitness trackers have a display.
Screen size
1.1 inch
Screen size
1.1 inch
This fitness tracker has a screen size of 1.1 inch which is larger than that of 55.9% of fitness trackers and equal to that of 4.2% of fitness trackers.
Display type
AMOLED
Display type
AMOLED
This fitness tracker uses AMOLED display technology which is more advanced than that of 74.9% of fitness trackers and the same as that of 25.1% of fitness trackers.
Screen resolution
126x 294
Screen resolution
126x 294
This fitness tracker has a screen resolution of 126x294 which is higher than that of 78.4% of fitness trackers and equal to that of 1.7% of fitness trackers.
Pixel density
290 ppi
Pixel density
290 ppi
This fitness tracker has a pixel density of 290 ppi which is higher than that of 76.9% of fitness trackers.
Show more
Form factor
wristband
Hybrid design
no
Hybrid design
no
This fitness tracker does not support Hybrid design. 2.4% of fitness trackers support Hybrid design.
Designed for kids
no
Designed for kids
no
This fitness tracker is not designed for kids. 2.4% of fitness trackers are designed for kids.
Replaceable watch band
yes
Replaceable watch band
yes
This fitness tracker has a replaceable watch band. 25.6% of fitness trackers have a replaceable watch band.
Band width
15.5 mm
Show more

Xiaomi Mi Band 5 vs the average fitness tracker

246810TotalHealthSports & NavigationBatteryDisplayConnectivitySmart FeaturesDesign & DurabilityApp & Wellness
  • Lower resting heart rate
    Resting heart rate
    yes
    This fitness tracker supports Resting heart rate, while the average fitness tracker does not. 47.7% of fitness trackers support Resting heart rate.
  • Touchscreen
    Touchscreen
    yes
    This fitness tracker has a touchscreen, while the average fitness tracker does not. 43.8% of fitness trackers have a touchscreen.
  • Swim stroke counter
    Swim stroke counter
    yes
    This fitness tracker supports swim stroke counting, while the average fitness tracker does not. 22% of fitness trackers support swim stroke counting.
  • Auto pause
    Auto pause
    yes
    This fitness tracker supports auto pause, while the average fitness tracker does not. 23.2% of fitness trackers support auto pause.
  • Heart rate alerts
    Fast/slow heart rate alerts
    yes
    This fitness tracker supports high and low heart rate alerts, while the average fitness tracker does not. 34.5% of fitness trackers support high and low heart rate alerts.
    High heart rate alert only.
  • Phone finder support
    Find my phone
    yes
    This fitness tracker supports phone finding, while the average fitness tracker does not. 49.3% of fitness trackers support phone finding.
  • 4 days longer battery life
    Battery life
    14 days
    This fitness tracker has a higher battery life than the average fitness tracker (14 days vs 10 days). The average fitness tracker has 10 days of battery life.
    Longer in saver mode
    14 days vs 10 days
  • Tracks elevation
    Elevation tracking
    yes
    This fitness tracker supports elevation tracking, while the average fitness tracker does not. 27.4% of fitness trackers support elevation tracking.
    Elevation via connected phone GPS
  • 15.4% higher user score
    User score
    9.2/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the fitness tracker.
    When it matters
    When you want to know how a fitness tracker performs in daily use and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
    Score distribution
    â–¼
    â–¼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    Xiaomi Mi Band 5
    the average fitness tracker
    Xiaomi Mi Band 5 has a higher user score than the average fitness tracker (9.24 vs 8.000).
    9.24 vs 8
  • 91.5% more popular
    Xiaomi Mi Band 5 has a higher popularity than the average fitness tracker (9.7 vs 5.1).
    9.7 vs 5.07
  • 9.4% better value for money
    Xiaomi Mi Band 5 has a higher value-for-money score than the average fitness tracker (8.66 vs 7.9).
    8.66 vs 7.92
  • Lower resting heart rate
    Resting heart rate
    yes
    This fitness tracker supports Resting heart rate, while the average fitness tracker does not. 47.7% of fitness trackers support Resting heart rate.
  • Heart rate alerts
    Fast/slow heart rate alerts
    yes
    This fitness tracker supports high and low heart rate alerts, while the average fitness tracker does not. 34.5% of fitness trackers support high and low heart rate alerts.
    High heart rate alert only.
  • Tracks menstrual cycle
    Menstrual cycle tracking
    yes
    This fitness tracker supports menstrual cycle tracking, while the average fitness tracker does not. 41.7% of fitness trackers support menstrual cycle tracking.
  • Period notifications
    Has period notifications
    yes
    This fitness tracker has period notifications, while the average fitness tracker does not. 31% of fitness trackers have period notifications.
  • Fertile window notifications
    Displays fertile window notifications
    yes
    This fitness tracker displays fertile window notifications, while the average fitness tracker does not. 24.1% of fitness trackers display fertile window notifications.
  • Ovulation prediction
    Predicts ovulation
    yes
    This fitness tracker predicts ovulation, while the average fitness tracker does not. 41.6% of fitness trackers predict ovulation.
  • Cycle start prediction
    Predicts start date
    yes
    This fitness tracker predicts the start date, while the average fitness tracker does not. 42.5% of fitness trackers predict the start date.
  • 4 days longer battery life
    Battery life
    14 days
    This fitness tracker has a higher battery life than the average fitness tracker (14 days vs 10 days). The average fitness tracker has 10 days of battery life.
    Longer in saver mode
    14 days vs 10 days
  • Touchscreen
    Touchscreen
    yes
    This fitness tracker has a touchscreen, while the average fitness tracker does not. 43.8% of fitness trackers have a touchscreen.
  • Color display
    Color display
    yes
    This fitness tracker has a color display, while the average fitness tracker does not. 37.7% of fitness trackers have a color display.
  • 18.4% higher pixel density
    Pixel density
    290 ppi
    This fitness tracker has a higher pixel density than the average fitness tracker (290 ppi vs 245 ppi). The average fitness tracker has a pixel density of 245 ppi.
    290 ppi vs 245 ppi
  • Durable display glass
    Display glass type
    reinforced glass
    This fitness tracker uses more durable display glass than the average fitness tracker (reinforced glass vs glass). The average fitness tracker uses glass display glass.
    reinforced glass vs glass
  • Modern Bluetooth version
    Bluetooth version
    5.0
    This fitness tracker supports a newer Bluetooth version than the average fitness tracker (5 vs 4). The average fitness tracker supports Bluetooth 4.0.
    5.0 vs 4.0
  • Mac OS X compatible
    Compatible with Mac OS X
    yes
    This fitness tracker is compatible with Mac OS X, while the average fitness tracker is not. 28.8% of fitness trackers are compatible with Mac OS X.
  • Phone finder support
    Find my phone
    yes
    This fitness tracker supports phone finding, while the average fitness tracker does not. 49.3% of fitness trackers support phone finding.
  • Passcode protection
    Passcode protection
    yes
    This fitness tracker supports passcode protection, while the average fitness tracker does not. 17.6% of fitness trackers support passcode protection.
    Uses an off-wrist lock.
  • Call control
    Call control
    yes
    This fitness tracker supports call controls, while the average fitness tracker does not. 41.5% of fitness trackers support call controls.
    Reject/mute only.
  • Camera remote control
    Camera remote control
    yes
    This fitness tracker supports camera remote control, while the average fitness tracker does not. 38.9% of fitness trackers support camera remote control.
    Enable it in Lab settings.
  • Gesture control
    Gesture control
    yes
    This fitness tracker supports gesture controls, while the average fitness tracker does not. 40.8% of fitness trackers support gesture controls.
  • 11.6% lighter
    Thickness
    22.1 g mm
    This fitness tracker is lighter than the average fitness tracker (22.1 g vs 25 g). The average fitness tracker weighs 25 g.
    22.1 g vs 25 g
  • Points-based system
    Points-based system
    yes
    This fitness tracker supports a points-based system, while the average fitness tracker does not. 38.6% of fitness trackers support a points-based system.
    Uses PAI.
  • 0.5 hours longer charging time
    Charging time
    2 hours
    This fitness tracker has a higher charging time than the average fitness tracker (2 hours vs 1.5 hours). The average fitness tracker needs 1.5 hours to charge.
    2 hours vs 1.5 hours
  • 50% smaller internal storage
    Internal storage
    0.016 GB
    This fitness tracker has a lower internal storage than the average fitness tracker (0 GB vs 0 GB). The average fitness tracker has 0.032 GB of internal storage.
    0.016 GB vs 0.032 GB
  • Lower screen resolution
    Screen resolution
    126 x 294
    This fitness tracker has a lower screen resolution than the average fitness tracker (126x294 vs 194x368). The average fitness tracker has a screen resolution of 194x368.
    126x294 vs 194x368
  • No achievements
    Achievements
    no
    This fitness tracker does not support achievements, while the average fitness tracker does. 75.8% of fitness trackers support achievements.
  • 1.45 mm thicker design
    Thickness
    12.45 mm
    This fitness tracker is thicker than the average fitness tracker (12.5 mm vs 11 mm). The average fitness tracker has a thickness of 11 mm.
    12.45 mm vs 11 mm
  • 6.15 mm greater height
    Height
    46.95 mm
    This fitness tracker is taller than the average fitness tracker (47 mm vs 40.8 mm). The average fitness tracker has a height of 40.8 mm.
    46.95 mm vs 40.8 mm
  • 74.4% lower RAM capacity
    RAM capacity
    0.000512 GB
    This fitness tracker has a lower RAM capacity than the average fitness tracker (0 GB vs 0 GB). The average fitness tracker has 0.002 GB of RAM capacity.
    0.000512 GB vs 0.002 GB
  • 0.5 hours longer charging time
    Charging time
    2 hours
    This fitness tracker has a higher charging time than the average fitness tracker (2 hours vs 1.5 hours). The average fitness tracker needs 1.5 hours to charge.
    2 hours vs 1.5 hours
  • Lower screen resolution
    Screen resolution
    126 x 294
    This fitness tracker has a lower screen resolution than the average fitness tracker (126x294 vs 194x368). The average fitness tracker has a screen resolution of 194x368.
    126x294 vs 194x368
  • 50% smaller internal storage
    Internal storage
    0.016 GB
    This fitness tracker has a lower internal storage than the average fitness tracker (0 GB vs 0 GB). The average fitness tracker has 0.032 GB of internal storage.
    0.016 GB vs 0.032 GB
  • 74.4% lower RAM capacity
    RAM capacity
    0.000512 GB
    This fitness tracker has a lower RAM capacity than the average fitness tracker (0 GB vs 0 GB). The average fitness tracker has 0.002 GB of RAM capacity.
    0.000512 GB vs 0.002 GB
  • 1.45 mm thicker design
    Thickness
    12.45 mm
    This fitness tracker is thicker than the average fitness tracker (12.5 mm vs 11 mm). The average fitness tracker has a thickness of 11 mm.
    12.45 mm vs 11 mm
  • 6.15 mm greater height
    Height
    46.95 mm
    This fitness tracker is taller than the average fitness tracker (47 mm vs 40.8 mm). The average fitness tracker has a height of 40.8 mm.
    46.95 mm vs 40.8 mm
  • No achievements
    Achievements
    no
    This fitness tracker does not support achievements, while the average fitness tracker does. 75.8% of fitness trackers support achievements.

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

W
wareable.com
20/08/2020
Summary of the review
T
techgearlab.com
29/04/2021
Summary of the review
X
xda-developers.com
25/10/2020
Summary of the review
F
fitandwell.com
27/06/2022
Summary of the review
S
stuff.tv
02/09/2020
Summary of the review
T
techadvisor.com
25/09/2020
Summary of the review
T
techradar.com
20/08/2020
Summary of the review
C
chip.de
29/10/2020
Summary of the review
F
faz.net
03/04/2026
Summary of the review
N
nextpit.de
23/02/2021
Summary of the review
H
homeandsmart.de
02/04/2026
Summary of the review
H
heise.de
14/09/2020
Summary of the review
F
frandroid.com
02/10/2020
Summary of the review
G
global.techradar.com
21/08/2020
Summary of the review
J
journaldugeek.com
02/12/2020
Summary of the review
N
nextpit.fr
23/02/2021
Summary of the review
C
computerhoy.20minutos.es
12/08/2020
Summary of the review
X
xataka.com.mx
14/08/2020
Summary of the review
T
tomshw.it
20/09/2020
Summary of the review
S
smartworld.it
09/07/2020
Summary of the review
R
robadainformatici.it
28/10/2025
Summary of the review
T
tech.everyeye.it
08/08/2020
Summary of the review
C
corriere.it
27/08/2020
Summary of the review
T
techgirl.nl
22/07/2021
Summary of the review
T
tweakers.net
11/11/2020
Summary of the review
A
androidworld.nl
11/08/2020
Summary of the review
A
androidplanet.nl
15/06/2020
Summary of the review
D
droidapp.nl
31/01/2021
Summary of the review
C
coolesuggesties.nl
07/10/2020
Summary of the review

Third-party reviews

Based on 9,691 buyer reviews from online shops.
Reviews last updated: June 2026 · How we calculate this

What we like about Xiaomi Mi Band 5

  • Exceptional value for money compared to higher-end brands like Fitbit
  • Large, bright 1.1-inch AMOLED display that is easy to read in direct sunlight
  • Greatly improved magnetic charging system that doesn't require removing the strap
  • Extensive variety of watch faces, including animated and customisable options
  • Broad range of features including 11 sports modes, PAI score, stress tracking, and camera remote control
  • Excellent battery life that can last up to 14 days under standard use
  • Water-resistant up to 50m (5ATM), making it suitable for swimming and showering

What we don't like about Xiaomi Mi Band 5

  • Inconsistent heart rate accuracy, especially during high-intensity or weightlifting sessions
  • Sleep tracking can be unreliable, occasionally missing wake periods or misidentifying sleep cycles
  • Lack of built-in GPS (requires a phone connection for distance mapping)
  • Global edition lacks NFC for payments and voice assistant support found in the Chinese version
  • Design can be uncomfortable for some due to the protruding heart rate sensor on the back
  • The official Mi Fit app contains advertisements and can feel unintuitive to new users
  • Limited integration with popular third-party fitness apps like Strava or Runkeeper

Verdict

The Xiaomi Mi Band 5 is a budget-friendly fitness tracker featuring a 1.1-inch AMOLED dynamic color display with 126x294 resolution and up to 450 nits of brightness. It offers 24/7 heart rate monitoring via an upgraded PPG sensor, 11 professional sports modes, 5ATM water resistance, and comprehensive tracking for sleep (including REM), stress, and women's health. Key advantages include its convenient magnetic charging system, 14-day battery life from a 125mAh cell, and a vast selection of over 100 customizable watch faces. However, it lacks built-in GPS and NFC in the global version, and some users find the companion app interface difficult to navigate.

Compare Xiaomi Mi Band 5 with other products in the Fitness trackers category

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Xiaomi Mi Band 5 and other products in the Fitness trackers category

No results found