OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS
Scored using Fitness trackers Methodology v3.0
Fitness trackers Methodology v3.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontum Fitness trackers Methodology v3.0: the technical score from the specifications is the base, and independent expert and video reviews (up to ±0.5 points), owner opinions (up to ±0.3) and best-of lists (up to +0.3) move it up or down.
Explore Fitness trackers Methodology v3.0

FITVII Slim review: 163 specs compared

Avg. price:~£45Battery life:10 daysScreen size:1.47 inchHeart rate monitor:yesGPS:noWaterproof depth rating:50 m

FITVII Slim Review: Compare 168 technical specifications and 3 expert and video reviews to see how this product ranks in the Fitness trackers category and whether it is worth buying.

FITVII Slim
7.4/10

Overall score

Score
7.4/ 10
✕
What it is
Our main score for this model, 1–10. It combines specs, best-of lists, expert reviews and owners.
How we count it
Parts: Technical score 35%, List score 30%, Reviews score 25%, Sentiment score 10%
Marks: Each part gets a mark out of 10. For reviews, lists and owners, a typical model in this category gets about 8 and the best one gets 10.
No data yet: A part with no data shows "?". It counts as the mark of a weaker model in this category (4 in 5 models with data score higher). This way, models with reviews, lists and owners usually come out ahead.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 64% of models
Score components

35%

7.4

Technical score

30%

?

List scoreNot enough data yet, so we use 7.5, the mark of a weaker model in this category

25%

7.4

Reviews score

10%

?

Sentiment scoreNot enough data yet, so we use 7.1, the mark of a weaker model in this category

â–²Better than 64% of fitness trackers
8.2

Value for money

Value for money
8.2/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the fitness tracker's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a fitness tracker with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 61% of models
Score components

70%

7.4

Overall score

30%

10

Price

â–²Better than 61%
7.4

Technical score

Technical score
7.4/ 10
✕
What it is
How good the specs are compared with the other models in this category, 1–10.
How we count it
Areas: We rate the specs in each area against the other models in this category.
Weighting: The areas that matter most to buyers count more. The shares are shown under Score components.
Share: The technical score is 35% of the overall score.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 72% of models
Score components

20%

7.4

Sports

20%

5.5

Battery

18%

8.4

Health

18%

7.8

Display

8%

7.7

Smart functions

8%

8.7

Wellness

4%

7.2

Connectivity

4%

8.7

Design

â–²Better than 72%
7.4

Reviews score

Reviews score
7.4/ 10
✕
What it is
Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
How we count it
Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves. Big test sites count more, short reviews half as much as full tests. A video review counts half.
Score: The average grade is 80% of the review mark; the number of reviews is the other 20% (1 review = 5, the typical number in this category = 8, the most-reviewed model = 10).
Enough data: With few reviews, the average grade is pulled toward the typical grade of this category. No reviews yet: 7.2 for now.
Share: Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 53% of models

7.4

Mark 7.6 is below the typical mark 7.6 of this category, so it cannot lift the score above the technical score

80%

8.0

Average grade

20%

6.1

Popularity

Grades by review (3)
3 video reviews, each counting half as much as a written test. Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
User ratings collected online are not part of this score.
â–¼Worse than 53%
?

List score

List score
7.5/ 10
✕
What it is
How often independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers put this model in their best-of lists for this category.
How we count it
Points: The model in the most lists of this category gets 10; the others get 8 to 10 in proportion. In no list yet: 7.5. Lists count 30% of the overall score.
Enough data: Every list counts, even a single one. With fewer than 5 best-of lists in the category, this part is left out.
Lists with this model (0)
Not in any best-of list yet, so this part counts as 7.5. Models in a list get 8 to 10.
Not in any best-of list yet
  • fitvii-slim
  • fitvii-slim
  • fitvii-slim
  • fitvii-slim
  • fitvii-slim
  • fitvii-slim
  • fitvii-slim
fitvii-slim
fitvii-slim
fitvii-slim
fitvii-slim
fitvii-slim
fitvii-slim
fitvii-slim
Best prices
*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
Best rankings
Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Loading category ranking...

Fitness trackers model ranking

Ranked #72 of 238 models in Fitness trackers (Overall score)

Technical Specifications of fitness tracker FITVII Slim

Technical score
Technical score
7.4/ 10
✕
What it is
How good the specs are compared with the other models in this category, 1–10.
How we count it
Areas: We rate the specs in each area against the other models in this category.
Weighting: The areas that matter most to buyers count more. The shares are shown under Score components.
Share: The technical score is 35% of the overall score.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 72% of models
Score components:

20%

7.4

Sports

20%

5.5

Battery

18%

8.4

Health

18%

7.8

Display

8%

7.7

Smart functions

8%

8.7

Wellness

4%

7.2

Connectivity

4%

8.7

Design

7.4
Reviews score
7.4
List score
?
Value for money
Value for money
8.2/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the fitness tracker's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a fitness tracker with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 61% of models
Score components:

70%

7.4

Overall score

30%

10

Price

8.2
Heart rate monitor
yes
This fitness tracker supports heart rate monitoring. 36.2% of fitness trackers support heart rate monitoring.
Resting heart rate
yes
This fitness tracker supports Resting heart rate. 47.5% of fitness trackers support Resting heart rate.
Fast/slow heart rate alerts
yes
This fitness tracker supports high and low heart rate alerts. 63.9% of fitness trackers support high and low heart rate alerts.
Irregular heart rate alerts
no
This fitness tracker does not support irregular heart rate alerts. 13.7% of fitness trackers support irregular heart rate alerts.
Blood oxygen sensor
yes
This fitness tracker has a blood oxygen sensor. 68.2% of fitness trackers have a blood oxygen sensor.
Show more
GPS
no
This fitness tracker does not have GPS. 12.7% of fitness trackers have GPS.
Satellite systems supported
N/A
GNSS bands supported
N/A
Galileo support
N/A
Acquires GPS faster
N/A
Show more
Notifications
yes
This fitness tracker supports notifications. 27.8% of fitness trackers support notifications.
Vibrating alerts
yes
This fitness tracker supports vibration alerts. 14.3% of fitness trackers support vibration alerts.
Call control
?
Call answering
no
This fitness tracker does not support call answering. 0.9% of fitness trackers support call answering.
Calendar sync
no
This fitness tracker does not support calendar sync. 20.5% of fitness trackers support calendar sync.
Show more
Activity reports
yes
This fitness tracker supports activity reports. 5% of fitness trackers support activity reports.
Goal setting
yes
This fitness tracker supports goal setting. 2.5% of fitness trackers support goal setting.
Achievements
?
Inactivity alerts
yes
This fitness tracker supports inactivity alerts. 21.4% of fitness trackers support inactivity alerts.
Coaching
no
This fitness tracker does not support coaching. 36.4% of fitness trackers support coaching.
Show more
Bluetooth version
4
This fitness tracker supports Bluetooth 4 which is newer than in 4.6% of fitness trackers and equal to that in 47% of fitness trackers.
Maximum Bluetooth range
10 m
Market range: <8 m – >23 m
This fitness tracker offers a Bluetooth range of 10 m which is higher than that of 14.9% of fitness trackers and equal to that of 64.5% of fitness trackers.
NFC
no
This fitness tracker does not have NFC. 11.8% of fitness trackers have NFC.
Wi-Fi connectivity
no
This fitness tracker does not support Wi-Fi. 2.5% of fitness trackers support Wi-Fi.
Wi-Fi version
no
This fitness tracker does not support modern Wi-Fi. 0.9% of fitness trackers support modern Wi-Fi.
Show more
Battery life
10 days
Market range: <5 days – >180 days
This fitness tracker offers a battery life of 10 days which is longer than that of 47.8% of fitness trackers and equal to that of 6.6% of fitness trackers.
Battery life with GPS on
N/A
Battery life in training mode
?
Power-saving battery life
?
Battery capacity
300 mAh
Market range: <30 mAh – >225 mAh
This fitness tracker has a battery capacity of 300 mAh which is higher than that of 95.3% of fitness trackers and equal to that of 2.9% of fitness trackers.
Show more
Display
yes
This fitness tracker has a display. 26.3% of fitness trackers have a display.
Screen size
1.47 inch
Market range: <0 inch – >1.6 inch
This fitness tracker has a screen size of 1.47 inch which is larger than that of 72.8% of fitness trackers and equal to that of 10.1% of fitness trackers.
Display type
?
Screen resolution
?
Pixel density
?
Show more
Form factor
wristband
Hybrid design
no
This fitness tracker does not support Hybrid design. 2.1% of fitness trackers support Hybrid design.
Designed for kids
no
This fitness tracker is not designed for kids. 3.3% of fitness trackers are designed for kids.
Replaceable watch band
yes
This fitness tracker has a replaceable watch band. 23.4% of fitness trackers have a replaceable watch band.
Band width
16 mm
Show more

FITVII Slim vs the average fitness tracker

246810TotalHealthSportsBatteryDisplayConnectivitySmart functionsDesignWellness
  • 2.4x larger battery capacity
    This fitness tracker has a higher battery capacity than the average fitness tracker (300 mAh vs 125 mAh). The average fitness tracker has 125 mAh of battery capacity.
    300 mAh vs 125 mAh
  • Blood oxygen monitoring
    This fitness tracker has a blood oxygen sensor, while the average fitness tracker does not. 32.1% of fitness trackers have a blood oxygen sensor.
  • Multi-sport mode
    This fitness tracker supports multi-sport mode, while the average fitness tracker does not. 14.5% of fitness trackers support multi-sport mode.
  • Touchscreen
    This fitness tracker has a touchscreen, while the average fitness tracker does not. 46.7% of fitness trackers have a touchscreen.
  • Heart rate alerts
    This fitness tracker supports high and low heart rate alerts, while the average fitness tracker does not. 36.4% of fitness trackers support high and low heart rate alerts.
  • 0.41 inch larger screen size
    This fitness tracker has a higher screen size than the average fitness tracker (1.5 inch vs 1.06 inch). The average fitness tracker has a screen size of 1.06 inch.
    1.47 inch vs 1.06 inch
  • Color display
    This fitness tracker has a color display, while the average fitness tracker does not. 39.1% of fitness trackers have a color display.
  • Tracks menstrual cycle
    This fitness tracker supports menstrual cycle tracking, while the average fitness tracker does not. 45.2% of fitness trackers support menstrual cycle tracking.
  • Blood oxygen monitoring
    This fitness tracker has a blood oxygen sensor, while the average fitness tracker does not. 32.1% of fitness trackers have a blood oxygen sensor.
  • Heart rate alerts
    This fitness tracker supports high and low heart rate alerts, while the average fitness tracker does not. 36.4% of fitness trackers support high and low heart rate alerts.
  • Tracks menstrual cycle
    This fitness tracker supports menstrual cycle tracking, while the average fitness tracker does not. 45.2% of fitness trackers support menstrual cycle tracking.
  • Period notifications
    This fitness tracker has period notifications, while the average fitness tracker does not. 34.6% of fitness trackers have period notifications.
  • Fertile window notifications
    This fitness tracker displays fertile window notifications, while the average fitness tracker does not. 25.1% of fitness trackers display fertile window notifications.
  • Ovulation prediction
    This fitness tracker predicts ovulation, while the average fitness tracker does not. 44.1% of fitness trackers predict ovulation.
  • Cycle start prediction
    This fitness tracker predicts the start date, while the average fitness tracker does not. 45.8% of fitness trackers predict the start date.
  • Blood pressure monitoring
    This fitness tracker supports blood pressure monitoring, while the average fitness tracker does not. 5% of fitness trackers support blood pressure monitoring.
  • Multi-sport mode
    This fitness tracker supports multi-sport mode, while the average fitness tracker does not. 14.5% of fitness trackers support multi-sport mode.
  • 91.5 more exercise modes
    This fitness tracker has more exercise modes than the average fitness tracker (100 vs 8.5). The average fitness tracker offers 8.5 exercise modes.
    100 vs 8.5
  • 2.4x larger battery capacity
    This fitness tracker has a higher battery capacity than the average fitness tracker (300 mAh vs 125 mAh). The average fitness tracker has 125 mAh of battery capacity.
    300 mAh vs 125 mAh
  • Touchscreen
    This fitness tracker has a touchscreen, while the average fitness tracker does not. 46.7% of fitness trackers have a touchscreen.
  • 0.41 inch larger screen size
    This fitness tracker has a higher screen size than the average fitness tracker (1.5 inch vs 1.06 inch). The average fitness tracker has a screen size of 1.06 inch.
    1.47 inch vs 1.06 inch
  • Color display
    This fitness tracker has a color display, while the average fitness tracker does not. 39.1% of fitness trackers have a color display.
  • Music playback
    This fitness tracker supports music playback, while the average fitness tracker does not. 2.1% of fitness trackers support music playback.
  • 2.03x larger internal storage
    This fitness tracker has a higher internal storage than the average fitness tracker (0.1 GB vs 0.1 GB). The average fitness tracker has 0.064 GB of internal storage.
    0.13 GB vs 0.064 GB
  • Camera remote control
    This fitness tracker supports camera remote control, while the average fitness tracker does not. 40.6% of fitness trackers support camera remote control.
  • No account required
    This fitness tracker works without an account, while the average fitness tracker does not. 9.8% of fitness trackers work without an account.
  • No pace measurement
    This fitness tracker does not support pace measurement, while the average fitness tracker does. 62.9% of fitness trackers support pace measurement.
  • 0.5 hours longer charging time
    This fitness tracker has a higher charging time than the average fitness tracker (2 hours vs 1.5 hours). The average fitness tracker needs 1.5 hours to charge.
    2 hours vs 1.5 hours
  • Old Bluetooth version
    This fitness tracker supports an older Bluetooth version than the average fitness tracker (4 vs 4.1). The average fitness tracker supports Bluetooth 4.1.
    4.0 vs 4.1
  • Not compatible with smart scales
    This fitness tracker is not compatible with smart scales, while the average fitness tracker is. 64.9% of fitness trackers are compatible with smart scales.
  • 5 mm thicker design
    This fitness tracker is thicker than the average fitness tracker (16 mm vs 11 mm). The average fitness tracker has a thickness of 11 mm.
    16 mm vs 11 mm
  • No pace measurement
    This fitness tracker does not support pace measurement, while the average fitness tracker does. 62.9% of fitness trackers support pace measurement.
  • 0.5 hours longer charging time
    This fitness tracker has a higher charging time than the average fitness tracker (2 hours vs 1.5 hours). The average fitness tracker needs 1.5 hours to charge.
    2 hours vs 1.5 hours
  • Old Bluetooth version
    This fitness tracker supports an older Bluetooth version than the average fitness tracker (4 vs 4.1). The average fitness tracker supports Bluetooth 4.1.
    4.0 vs 4.1
  • 5 mm thicker design
    This fitness tracker is thicker than the average fitness tracker (16 mm vs 11 mm). The average fitness tracker has a thickness of 11 mm.
    16 mm vs 11 mm
  • Not compatible with smart scales
    This fitness tracker is not compatible with smart scales, while the average fitness tracker is. 64.9% of fitness trackers are compatible with smart scales.

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

9.0
Maciej Piotrowski
≈ estimated
03/08/2025
Hands-on review · battery, calls and app tests
Verdict
FITVII Slim is a waterproof fitness tracker at a good price and recommended for everyone, though its watch face library is limited.
9.0
Buyer's Edge
≈ estimated
29/06/2025
Hands-on review · daily use and feature walkthrough
Verdict
FITVII Slim is an inexpensive smartwatch that meets what the reviewer wants from daily wear.
8.0
Unwrapped and Rated
≈ estimated
23/10/2019
Unboxing and first look · charging time test
Verdict
FITVII Slim is worth a look for anyone who wants a small, comfortable watch that can do a lot, though it is somewhat pricey.
8.0
Manar Jackson
≈ estimated
05/04/2026
First look · short wear test
Verdict
FITVII Slim is a slim, comfortable watch worth trying if you want to get healthier.
Hands-on video, no verdict
Hands-on video, no verdict
Overview video

Third-party reviews

What we like about FITVII Slim

  • The battery lasted about 10 days between charges in tests.
  • The 1.47 inch touchscreen is easy to read in daylight.
  • IP68 and 50 m rating mean it handles swimming and sweaty workouts.
  • 100 exercise modes cover many sports.
  • Calls from the wrist sound clear on the other end.
  • Blood pressure tracking is built in.

What we don't like about FITVII Slim

  • At 16 mm thick, the watch sits bulky on the wrist.
  • There is no GPS, so route tracking is missing.
  • The choice of watch faces is limited, and many are busy or have small print.
  • The companion app is somewhat limited.
  • The charger uses an older micro USB cable.

Verdict

Battery life is what sets the FITVII Slim apart, a budget smartwatch that lasts 10 days and fits someone who wants a bright touchscreen and many workout modes. The 1.47 inch screen is easy to read in daylight, and calls from the wrist sound clear on the other end. It is waterproof to 50 m and rated IP68, so swimming and sweaty workouts are no problem. There are 100 exercise modes, multi-sport mode and a stopwatch. Sleep reports and menstrual cycle tracking are included, and no account is needed to get started. The trade-off is a thick 16 mm body and no GPS, and the watch faces and app are limited. The charger uses micro USB, and a full charge takes 2 hours. It suits a buyer who wants a waterproof watch with a long battery on a small budget.

Compare FITVII Slim with other products in the Fitness trackers category

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of FITVII Slim and other products in the Fitness trackers category

No results found