Scored using Fitness trackers Methodology v1.0
Fitness trackers Methodology v1.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are evaluated mathematically under Frontumo Fitness trackers Methodology v1.0 using verified laboratory benchmarks, technical specifications, and authentic consumer ratings with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Fitness trackers Methodology v1.0

Xiaomi Mi Band 2 Review | 171 Data compared

Avg. price:~£20Battery life:20 daysScreen size:0.42 inchHeart rate monitor:yesGPS:noWaterproof depth rating:1 m

Xiaomi Mi Band 2 Review: Compare 171 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Fitness trackers category and whether it is worth buying.

7.0

Overall score

Score
7.0/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the fitness tracker's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best fitness trackers on the market.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

80%

6.9

Technical score

20%

7.7

User score

â–¼Worse than 51% of fitness-trackers
6.9

Technical score

Technical score
6.9/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Fitness trackers category across these key areas: Health, Sports & Navigation, Smart Features, App & Wellness, Connectivity, Battery, Display, Design & Durability.
When it matters
When you want to compare fitness trackers based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

20%

7.5

Sports & Navigation

20%

7.6

Battery

18%

6.5

Health

18%

5.6

Display

8%

7.1

Smart Features

8%

6.6

App & Wellness

4%

7.2

Connectivity

4%

7.4

Design & Durability

â–¼Worse than 55% of fitness-trackers
7.7

User score

User score
7.7/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the fitness tracker.
When it matters
When you want to know how a fitness tracker performs in daily use and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

8.2

User ratings

30%

6.4

Number of reviews

Based on 309 buyer reviews from online shops.
How we calculate this
User ratings – average star rating across all shop listings, weighted by how many reviews each has, on a 1–10 scale.
Number of reviews – how many buyer reviews the product has, on a logarithmic scale; the 8% most-reviewed models in the category get 10.
â–¼Worse than 78% of fitness-trackers
  • xiaomi-mi-band-2
  • xiaomi-mi-band-2
  • xiaomi-mi-band-2
  • xiaomi-mi-band-2
xiaomi-mi-band-2
xiaomi-mi-band-2
xiaomi-mi-band-2
xiaomi-mi-band-2

Best prices

*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.

Best rankings

Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Loading...
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of fitness tracker Xiaomi Mi Band 2

Technical score
Technical score
6.9/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Fitness trackers category across these key areas: Health, Sports & Navigation, Smart Features, App & Wellness, Connectivity, Battery, Display, Design & Durability.
When it matters
When you want to compare fitness trackers based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

20%

7.5

Sports & Navigation

20%

7.6

Battery

18%

6.5

Health

18%

5.6

Display

8%

7.1

Smart Features

8%

6.6

App & Wellness

4%

7.2

Connectivity

4%

7.4

Design & Durability

6.9
User score
User score
7.7/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the fitness tracker.
When it matters
When you want to know how a fitness tracker performs in daily use and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

8.2

User ratings

30%

6.4

Number of reviews

Based on 309 buyer reviews from online shops.
How we calculate this
User ratings – average star rating across all shop listings, weighted by how many reviews each has, on a 1–10 scale.
Number of reviews – how many buyer reviews the product has, on a logarithmic scale; the 8% most-reviewed models in the category get 10.
7.7
Popularity
Popularity
6.4/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the fitness tracker.
When it matters
When you prefer to buy a product chosen and reviewed by many other consumers.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Popularity:
Xiaomi Mi Band 2 has a popularity score of 6.4 points, which is higher than 62% of fitness trackers.
6.4
Value for money
Value for money
7.9/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the fitness tracker's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a fitness tracker with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

60%

7.0

Overall score

40%

10

Price

7.9
Heart rate monitor
yes
Heart rate monitor
yes
This fitness tracker supports heart rate monitoring. 40.2% of fitness trackers support heart rate monitoring.
Resting heart rate
no
Resting heart rate
no
This fitness tracker does not support Resting heart rate. 47.9% of fitness trackers support Resting heart rate.
Fast/slow heart rate alerts
no
Fast/slow heart rate alerts
no
This fitness tracker does not support high and low heart rate alerts. 34.7% of fitness trackers support high and low heart rate alerts.
Irregular heart rate alerts
no
Irregular heart rate alerts
no
This fitness tracker does not support irregular heart rate alerts. 12.4% of fitness trackers support irregular heart rate alerts.
Blood oxygen sensor
no
Blood oxygen sensor
no
This fitness tracker does not have a blood oxygen sensor. 25.4% of fitness trackers have a blood oxygen sensor.
Show more
GPS
no
GPS
no
This fitness tracker does not have GPS. 11% of fitness trackers have GPS.
Satellite systems supported
no
Satellite systems supported
no
This fitness tracker supports no satellite systems which is less versatile than that of 12.2% of fitness trackers and the same as that of 87.8% of fitness trackers.
GNSS bands supported
no
GNSS bands supported
no
This fitness tracker does not support advanced GNSS bands. 8.9% of fitness trackers support advanced GNSS bands.
Galileo support
no
Galileo support
no
This fitness tracker does not support Galileo. 4.9% of fitness trackers support Galileo.
Acquires GPS faster
no
Acquires GPS faster
no
This fitness tracker does not support faster GPS acquisition. 8.1% of fitness trackers support faster GPS acquisition.
Show more
Notifications
yes
Notifications
yes
This fitness tracker supports notifications. 27.5% of fitness trackers support notifications.
Vibrating alerts
yes
Vibrating alerts
yes
This fitness tracker supports vibration alerts. 16.3% of fitness trackers support vibration alerts.
Call control
no
Call control
no
This fitness tracker does not support call controls. 41.8% of fitness trackers support call controls.
Call answering
no
Call answering
no
This fitness tracker does not support call answering. 1% of fitness trackers support call answering.
Calendar sync
no
Calendar sync
no
This fitness tracker does not support calendar sync. 20.3% of fitness trackers support calendar sync.
Show more
Activity reports
no
Activity reports
no
This fitness tracker does not support activity reports. 94.8% of fitness trackers support activity reports.
Goal setting
yes
Goal setting
yes
This fitness tracker supports goal setting. 2.4% of fitness trackers support goal setting.
Achievements
no
Achievements
no
This fitness tracker does not support achievements. 76.2% of fitness trackers support achievements.
Inactivity alerts
yes
Inactivity alerts
yes
This fitness tracker supports inactivity alerts. 23.5% of fitness trackers support inactivity alerts.
Coaching
no
Coaching
no
This fitness tracker does not support coaching. 34% of fitness trackers support coaching.
Show more
Bluetooth version
4
Bluetooth version
4
This fitness tracker supports Bluetooth 4 which is newer than in 5.1% of fitness trackers and equal to that in 51.3% of fitness trackers.
Maximum Bluetooth range
10 m
Maximum Bluetooth range
10 m
This fitness tracker offers a Bluetooth range of 10 m which is higher than that of 14.9% of fitness trackers and equal to that of 63.4% of fitness trackers.
NFC
no
NFC
no
This fitness tracker does not have NFC. 13% of fitness trackers have NFC.
Wi-Fi connectivity
no
Wi-Fi connectivity
no
This fitness tracker does not support Wi-Fi. 1.8% of fitness trackers support Wi-Fi.
no Wi-Fi connectivity.
Wi-Fi version
no
Wi-Fi version
no
This fitness tracker does not support modern Wi-Fi. 1% of fitness trackers support modern Wi-Fi.
no Wi-Fi support.
Show more
Battery life
20 days
Battery life
20 days
This fitness tracker offers a battery life of 20 days which is longer than that of 78.2% of fitness trackers and equal to that of 3.5% of fitness trackers.
Battery life with GPS on
N/A
Battery life in training mode
?
Battery life in power-saving mode
?
Battery capacity
70 mAh
Battery capacity
70 mAh
This fitness tracker has a battery capacity of 70 mAh which is lower than that of 77.6% of fitness trackers and equal to that of 3.3% of fitness trackers.
Show more
Display
yes
Display
yes
This fitness tracker has a display. 24.1% of fitness trackers have a display.
Screen size
0.42 inch
Screen size
0.42 inch
This fitness tracker has a screen size of 0.42 inch which is smaller than that of 97.2% of fitness trackers and equal to that of 0.7% of fitness trackers.
Display type
OLED
Display type
OLED
This fitness tracker uses OLED display technology which is more advanced than that of 52.8% of fitness trackers and the same as that of 21.5% of fitness trackers.
Screen resolution
72x 40
Screen resolution
72x 40
This fitness tracker has a screen resolution of 72x40 which is lower than that of 63.1% of fitness trackers and equal to that of 0.6% of fitness trackers.
Pixel density
193 ppi
Pixel density
193 ppi
This fitness tracker has a pixel density of 193 ppi which is lower than that of 64.8% of fitness trackers and equal to that of 1.9% of fitness trackers.
Show more
Form factor
wristband
Hybrid design
no
Hybrid design
no
This fitness tracker does not support Hybrid design. 2.4% of fitness trackers support Hybrid design.
Designed for kids
no
Designed for kids
no
This fitness tracker is not designed for kids. 2.4% of fitness trackers are designed for kids.
Replaceable watch band
yes
Replaceable watch band
yes
This fitness tracker has a replaceable watch band. 25.6% of fitness trackers have a replaceable watch band.
Band width
15.7 mm
Show more

Xiaomi Mi Band 2 vs the average fitness tracker

246810TotalHealthSports & NavigationBatteryDisplayConnectivitySmart FeaturesDesign & DurabilityApp & Wellness
  • 10 days longer battery life
    Battery life
    20 days
    This fitness tracker has a higher battery life than the average fitness tracker (20 days vs 10 days). The average fitness tracker has 10 days of battery life.
    20 days vs 10 days
  • 24% lighter
    Thickness
    19 g mm
    This fitness tracker is lighter than the average fitness tracker (19 g vs 25 g). The average fitness tracker weighs 25 g.
    19 g vs 25 g
  • Built-in route tracker
    Has a route tracker
    yes
    This fitness tracker supports route tracking, while the average fitness tracker does not. 49.8% of fitness trackers support route tracking.
    Uses connected phone GPS for route maps.
  • 3.5x cheaper
    Xiaomi Mi Band 2 is cheaper than the average fitness tracker (£20 vs £70).
    £20 vs £70
  • Camera remote control
    Camera remote control
    yes
    This fitness tracker supports camera remote control, while the average fitness tracker does not. 38.9% of fitness trackers support camera remote control.
    Needs a third-party app.
  • Gesture control
    Gesture control
    yes
    This fitness tracker supports gesture controls, while the average fitness tracker does not. 40.8% of fitness trackers support gesture controls.
  • 3.5x cheaper
    Xiaomi Mi Band 2 is cheaper than the average fitness tracker (£20 vs £70).
    £20 vs £70
  • 10 days longer battery life
    Battery life
    20 days
    This fitness tracker has a higher battery life than the average fitness tracker (20 days vs 10 days). The average fitness tracker has 10 days of battery life.
    20 days vs 10 days
  • Camera remote control
    Camera remote control
    yes
    This fitness tracker supports camera remote control, while the average fitness tracker does not. 38.9% of fitness trackers support camera remote control.
    Needs a third-party app.
  • Gesture control
    Gesture control
    yes
    This fitness tracker supports gesture controls, while the average fitness tracker does not. 40.8% of fitness trackers support gesture controls.
  • 24% lighter
    Thickness
    19 g mm
    This fitness tracker is lighter than the average fitness tracker (19 g vs 25 g). The average fitness tracker weighs 25 g.
    19 g vs 25 g
  • Lower screen resolution
    Screen resolution
    72 x 40
    This fitness tracker has a lower screen resolution than the average fitness tracker (72x40 vs 194x368). The average fitness tracker has a screen resolution of 194x368.
    72x40 vs 194x368
  • No automatic activity detection
    Automatic activity detection
    no
    This fitness tracker does not support automatic activity detection, while the average fitness tracker does. 52% of fitness trackers support automatic activity detection.
  • 0.62 inch smaller screen size
    Screen size
    0.42 inch
    This fitness tracker has a lower screen size than the average fitness tracker (0.4 inch vs 1.04 inch). The average fitness tracker has a screen size of 1.04 inch.
    0.42 inch vs 1.04 inch
  • 0.5 hours longer charging time
    Charging time
    2 hours
    This fitness tracker has a higher charging time than the average fitness tracker (2 hours vs 1.5 hours). The average fitness tracker needs 1.5 hours to charge.
    2 hours vs 1.5 hours
  • No activity reports
    Activity reports
    no
    This fitness tracker does not support activity reports, while the average fitness tracker does. 94.3% of fitness trackers support activity reports.
  • 49 m lower waterproof depth rating
    Waterproof depth rating
    1 m
    This fitness tracker has a lower waterproof depth rating than the average fitness tracker (1 m vs 50 m). The average fitness tracker has a waterproof depth rating of 50 m.
    1 m vs 50 m
  • 36.4% smaller battery capacity
    Battery capacity
    70 mAh
    This fitness tracker has a lower battery capacity than the average fitness tracker (70 mAh vs 110 mAh). The average fitness tracker has 110 mAh of battery capacity.
    70 mAh vs 110 mAh
  • Limited ip rating
    IP rating
    IP67
    This fitness tracker has a lower IP rating than the average fitness tracker (IP67 vs IP68). The average fitness tracker has an IP rating of IP68.
    IP67 vs IP68
  • 4.3% lower user score
    User score
    7.7/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the fitness tracker.
    When it matters
    When you want to know how a fitness tracker performs in daily use and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
    Score distribution
    ▼▼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    Xiaomi Mi Band 2
    the average fitness tracker
    Xiaomi Mi Band 2 has a lower user score than the average fitness tracker (7.67 vs 8.000).
    7.67 vs 8
  • 0.5 hours longer charging time
    Charging time
    2 hours
    This fitness tracker has a higher charging time than the average fitness tracker (2 hours vs 1.5 hours). The average fitness tracker needs 1.5 hours to charge.
    2 hours vs 1.5 hours
  • 36.4% smaller battery capacity
    Battery capacity
    70 mAh
    This fitness tracker has a lower battery capacity than the average fitness tracker (70 mAh vs 110 mAh). The average fitness tracker has 110 mAh of battery capacity.
    70 mAh vs 110 mAh
  • Lower screen resolution
    Screen resolution
    72 x 40
    This fitness tracker has a lower screen resolution than the average fitness tracker (72x40 vs 194x368). The average fitness tracker has a screen resolution of 194x368.
    72x40 vs 194x368
  • 0.62 inch smaller screen size
    Screen size
    0.42 inch
    This fitness tracker has a lower screen size than the average fitness tracker (0.4 inch vs 1.04 inch). The average fitness tracker has a screen size of 1.04 inch.
    0.42 inch vs 1.04 inch
  • 21.2% lower pixel density
    Pixel density
    193 ppi
    This fitness tracker has a lower pixel density than the average fitness tracker (193 ppi vs 245 ppi). The average fitness tracker has a pixel density of 245 ppi.
    193 ppi vs 245 ppi
  • Basic display glass
    Display glass type
    polycarbonate
    This fitness tracker uses less durable display glass than the average fitness tracker (polycarbonate vs glass). The average fitness tracker uses glass display glass.
    polycarbonate vs glass
  • No stopwatch
    Stopwatch
    no
    This fitness tracker does not have a stopwatch, while the average fitness tracker does. 59.7% of fitness trackers have a stopwatch.
  • 49 m lower waterproof depth rating
    Waterproof depth rating
    1 m
    This fitness tracker has a lower waterproof depth rating than the average fitness tracker (1 m vs 50 m). The average fitness tracker has a waterproof depth rating of 50 m.
    1 m vs 50 m
  • Limited ip rating
    IP rating
    IP67
    This fitness tracker has a lower IP rating than the average fitness tracker (IP67 vs IP68). The average fitness tracker has an IP rating of IP68.
    IP67 vs IP68
  • 10 °C higher minimum operating temperature
    Min operating temperature
    -10 °C
    This fitness tracker has a higher minimum operating temperature than the average fitness tracker (-10 °C vs 0 °C). The average fitness tracker supports a minimum operating temperature of 0 °C.
    -10 °C vs 0 °C
  • No activity reports
    Activity reports
    no
    This fitness tracker does not support activity reports, while the average fitness tracker does. 94.3% of fitness trackers support activity reports.
  • No personalization options
    Can be personalised
    no
    This fitness tracker cannot be personalized, while the average fitness tracker can. 79.9% of fitness trackers can be personalized.
  • No achievements
    Achievements
    no
    This fitness tracker does not support achievements, while the average fitness tracker does. 75.8% of fitness trackers support achievements.

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

E
en.techreviewer.de
06/10/2024
Summary of the review
T
trustedreviews.com
02/08/2016
Summary of the review
T
techenclave.com
05/08/2016
Summary of the review
T
techrvw.com
11/02/2018
Summary of the review
T
techadvisor.com
13/07/2016
Summary of the review
W
wareable.com
25/05/2017
Summary of the review
C
cnet.com
03/10/2016
Summary of the review
T
techradar.com
14/12/2017
Summary of the review
C
coolsmartphone.com
11/07/2016
Summary of the review
O
olympusmountaineering.com
27/07/2017
Summary of the review
M
medium.com
10/06/2017
Summary of the review
G
gogi.in
12/07/2016
Summary of the review
C
cnx-software.com
27/06/2016
Summary of the review
H
head-fi.org
03/03/2018
Summary of the review
C
chip.de
14/08/2016
Summary of the review
C
chip.de
09/08/2016
Summary of the review
C
computerbild.de
20/07/2018
Summary of the review
F
fitness-factory.net
Datum unbekannt
Summary of the review
N
nextpit.de
18/07/2016
Summary of the review
H
handelsblatt.com
20/07/2016
Summary of the review
T
top-for-phone.fr
17/07/2016
Summary of the review
P
phonandroid.com
16/06/2016
Summary of the review
J
journaldugeek.com
10/08/2016
Summary of the review
L
lesnumeriques.com
20/08/2016
Summary of the review
F
frandroid.com
09/06/2023
Summary of the review
B
bxnxg.com
03/07/2016
Summary of the review
V
vonguru.fr
31/10/2016
Summary of the review
A
antoineguilbert.fr
11/09/2016
Summary of the review
R
rotek.fr
04/02/2018
Summary of the review
S
siecledigital.fr
12/02/2018
Summary of the review
S
smmart.es
20/07/2016
Summary of the review
C
computerhoy.20minutos.es
18/02/2017
Summary of the review
E
elespanol.com
01/07/2016
Summary of the review
P
pabloyglesias.com
28/09/2016
Summary of the review
P
profesionalreview.com
12/12/2016
Summary of the review
X
xataka.com
06/03/2018
Summary of the review
R
recensioniorologi.it
11/12/2019
Summary of the review
X
xiaomiamo.it
11/10/2016
Summary of the review
Q
qualescegliere.it
01/02/2017
Summary of the review
T
tuttoandroid.net
24/06/2016
Summary of the review
A
andreagaleazzi.com
29/06/2016
Summary of the review
T
tweakers.net
11/02/2018
Summary of the review
N
nl.techreviewer.de
06/10/2024
Summary of the review
T
tweakers.net
17/03/2018
Summary of the review
T
tweakers.net
04/01/2017
Summary of the review
T
tweakers.net
25/11/2016
Summary of the review
T
tweakers.net
05/08/2016
Summary of the review
G
gadgetgear.nl
15/09/2016
Summary of the review
A
androidworld.nl
22/09/2016
Summary of the review

Third-party reviews

Based on 309 buyer reviews from online shops.
Reviews last updated: June 2026 · How we calculate this

What we like about Xiaomi Mi Band 2

  • Incredible value for money and very affordable price point
  • Excellent battery life, typically lasting between 10 to 20+ days
  • Lightweight and comfortable design suitable for 24/7 wear
  • IP67 water resistance allows for showering and hand-washing
  • Includes basic but useful notifications for calls and selected apps
  • Sleep tracking is generally accurate and reliable
  • Simple, easy-to-read OLED display for quick stat checks

What we don't like about Xiaomi Mi Band 2

  • Heart rate monitor is often inconsistent and does not support continuous tracking
  • OLED display is difficult to read outdoors in direct sunlight
  • Step counting can be less accurate, sometimes triggered by driving or arm movement
  • Official Mi Fit app has been described as basic or buggy by some users
  • Must remove the tracker module from the strap every time you need to charge it
  • Lacks built-in GPS for more advanced exercise tracking
  • Limited notification detail (displays icons rather than full message text)

Verdict

The Xiaomi Mi Band 2 is an ultra-affordable fitness tracker featuring a 0.42-inch monochrome OLED display and a single capacitive touch button for navigating metrics like time, steps, and heart rate. It is equipped with a 70mAh battery providing up to 20 days of life, an ADI accelerometer for pedometer functions, and an optical heart rate sensor, all housed in an IP67 water-resistant body. Main pros include its exceptional battery longevity, lightweight design (approx. 7g module), and basic smart notifications for calls and apps. However, it lacks integrated GPS, the display can be difficult to read in direct sunlight, and the heart rate monitor does not support continuous all-day tracking.

Compare Xiaomi Mi Band 2 with other products in the Fitness trackers category

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Xiaomi Mi Band 2 and other products in the Fitness trackers category

No results found