Scored using Fitness trackers Methodology v1.0
Fitness trackers Methodology v1.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are evaluated mathematically under Frontumo Fitness trackers Methodology v1.0 using verified laboratory benchmarks, technical specifications, and authentic consumer ratings with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Fitness trackers Methodology v1.0

Samsung Galaxy FIT2 Review | 171 Data compared

Avg. price:~£45Battery life:15 daysScreen size:1.1 inchHeart rate monitor:yesGPS:noWaterproof depth rating:50 m

Samsung Galaxy FIT2 Review: Compare 171 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Fitness trackers category and whether it is worth buying.

8.2

Overall score

Score
8.2/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the fitness tracker's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best fitness trackers on the market.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

80%

7.9

Technical score

20%

9.2

User score

▲Better than 85% of fitness-trackers
7.9

Technical score

Technical score
7.9/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Fitness trackers category across these key areas: Health, Sports & Navigation, Smart Features, App & Wellness, Connectivity, Battery, Display, Design & Durability.
When it matters
When you want to compare fitness trackers based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

20%

8.4

Sports & Navigation

20%

7.5

Battery

18%

7.8

Health

18%

7.4

Display

8%

7.4

Smart Features

8%

9.1

App & Wellness

4%

7.9

Connectivity

4%

8.9

Design & Durability

▲Better than 84% of fitness-trackers
9.2

User score

User score
9.2/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the fitness tracker.
When it matters
When you want to know how a fitness tracker performs in daily use and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

9.0

User ratings

30%

9.8

Number of reviews

Based on 10,883 buyer reviews from online shops.
How we calculate this
User ratings – average star rating across all shop listings, weighted by how many reviews each has, on a 1–10 scale.
Number of reviews – how many buyer reviews the product has, on a logarithmic scale; the 8% most-reviewed models in the category get 10.
★Better than 96% of fitness-trackers
  • samsung-galaxy-fit2
  • samsung-galaxy-fit2
  • samsung-galaxy-fit2
  • samsung-galaxy-fit2
  • samsung-galaxy-fit2
  • samsung-galaxy-fit2
  • samsung-galaxy-fit2
  • samsung-galaxy-fit2
samsung-galaxy-fit2
samsung-galaxy-fit2
samsung-galaxy-fit2
samsung-galaxy-fit2
samsung-galaxy-fit2
samsung-galaxy-fit2
samsung-galaxy-fit2
samsung-galaxy-fit2

Best prices

*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.

Best rankings

Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Loading...
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of fitness tracker Samsung Galaxy FIT2

Technical score
Technical score
7.9/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Fitness trackers category across these key areas: Health, Sports & Navigation, Smart Features, App & Wellness, Connectivity, Battery, Display, Design & Durability.
When it matters
When you want to compare fitness trackers based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

20%

8.4

Sports & Navigation

20%

7.5

Battery

18%

7.8

Health

18%

7.4

Display

8%

7.4

Smart Features

8%

9.1

App & Wellness

4%

7.9

Connectivity

4%

8.9

Design & Durability

7.9
User score
User score
9.2/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the fitness tracker.
When it matters
When you want to know how a fitness tracker performs in daily use and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

9.0

User ratings

30%

9.8

Number of reviews

Based on 10,883 buyer reviews from online shops.
How we calculate this
User ratings – average star rating across all shop listings, weighted by how many reviews each has, on a 1–10 scale.
Number of reviews – how many buyer reviews the product has, on a logarithmic scale; the 8% most-reviewed models in the category get 10.
9.2
Popularity
Popularity
9.8/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the fitness tracker.
When it matters
When you prefer to buy a product chosen and reviewed by many other consumers.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Popularity:
Samsung Galaxy FIT2 has a popularity score of 9.8 points, which is higher than 90.1% of fitness trackers.
9.8
Value for money
Value for money
8.7/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the fitness tracker's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a fitness tracker with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

60%

8.2

Overall score

40%

10

Price

8.7
Heart rate monitor
yes
Heart rate monitor
yes
This fitness tracker supports heart rate monitoring. 40.2% of fitness trackers support heart rate monitoring.
Resting heart rate
yes
Resting heart rate
yes
This fitness tracker supports Resting heart rate. 52.6% of fitness trackers support Resting heart rate.
Fast/slow heart rate alerts
yes
Fast/slow heart rate alerts
yes
This fitness tracker supports high and low heart rate alerts. 65.8% of fitness trackers support high and low heart rate alerts.
High heart rate alert only.
Irregular heart rate alerts
no
Irregular heart rate alerts
no
This fitness tracker does not support irregular heart rate alerts. 12.4% of fitness trackers support irregular heart rate alerts.
Blood oxygen sensor
no
Blood oxygen sensor
no
This fitness tracker does not have a blood oxygen sensor. 25.4% of fitness trackers have a blood oxygen sensor.
Show more
GPS
no
GPS
no
This fitness tracker does not have GPS. 11% of fitness trackers have GPS.
Satellite systems supported
no
Satellite systems supported
no
This fitness tracker supports no satellite systems which is less versatile than that of 12.2% of fitness trackers and the same as that of 87.8% of fitness trackers.
no satellite positioning support.
GNSS bands supported
no
GNSS bands supported
no
This fitness tracker does not support advanced GNSS bands. 8.9% of fitness trackers support advanced GNSS bands.
Galileo support
no
Galileo support
no
This fitness tracker does not support Galileo. 4.9% of fitness trackers support Galileo.
Acquires GPS faster
no
Acquires GPS faster
no
This fitness tracker does not support faster GPS acquisition. 8.1% of fitness trackers support faster GPS acquisition.
Show more
Notifications
yes
Notifications
yes
This fitness tracker supports notifications. 27.5% of fitness trackers support notifications.
Vibrating alerts
yes
Vibrating alerts
yes
This fitness tracker supports vibration alerts. 16.3% of fitness trackers support vibration alerts.
Call control
yes
Call control
yes
This fitness tracker supports call controls. 58.7% of fitness trackers support call controls.
Reject/mute only.
Call answering
no
Call answering
no
This fitness tracker does not support call answering. 1% of fitness trackers support call answering.
Calendar sync
yes
Calendar sync
yes
This fitness tracker supports calendar sync. 80.2% of fitness trackers support calendar sync.
Includes a calendar widget for synced phone events.
Show more
Activity reports
yes
Activity reports
yes
This fitness tracker supports activity reports. 5.7% of fitness trackers support activity reports.
via Samsung Health
Goal setting
yes
Goal setting
yes
This fitness tracker supports goal setting. 2.4% of fitness trackers support goal setting.
Achievements
yes
Achievements
yes
This fitness tracker supports achievements. 24.3% of fitness trackers support achievements.
Inactivity alerts
yes
Inactivity alerts
yes
This fitness tracker supports inactivity alerts. 23.5% of fitness trackers support inactivity alerts.
Coaching
no
Coaching
no
This fitness tracker does not support coaching. 34% of fitness trackers support coaching.
Show more
Bluetooth version
5.1
Bluetooth version
5.1
This fitness tracker supports Bluetooth 5.1 which is newer than in 91.9% of fitness trackers and equal to that in 2% of fitness trackers.
Maximum Bluetooth range
?
NFC
no
NFC
no
This fitness tracker does not have NFC. 13% of fitness trackers have NFC.
Wi-Fi connectivity
?
Wi-Fi version
no
Wi-Fi version
no
This fitness tracker does not support modern Wi-Fi. 1% of fitness trackers support modern Wi-Fi.
no Wi-Fi support.
Show more
Battery life
15 days
Battery life
15 days
This fitness tracker offers a battery life of 15 days which is longer than that of 74.8% of fitness trackers and equal to that of 0.5% of fitness trackers.
Battery life with GPS on
N/A
Battery life in training mode
?
Battery life in power-saving mode
21 h
Battery life in power-saving mode
21 h
This fitness tracker offers a power-saving battery life of 21 h which is longer than that of 61.1% of fitness trackers and equal to that of 11.1% of fitness trackers.
Battery capacity
159 mAh
Battery capacity
159 mAh
This fitness tracker has a battery capacity of 159 mAh which is higher than that of 60.5% of fitness trackers.
Show more
Display
yes
Display
yes
This fitness tracker has a display. 24.1% of fitness trackers have a display.
Screen size
1.1 inch
Screen size
1.1 inch
This fitness tracker has a screen size of 1.1 inch which is larger than that of 55.9% of fitness trackers and equal to that of 4.2% of fitness trackers.
Display type
AMOLED
Display type
AMOLED
This fitness tracker uses AMOLED display technology which is more advanced than that of 74.9% of fitness trackers and the same as that of 25.1% of fitness trackers.
Screen resolution
126x 294
Screen resolution
126x 294
This fitness tracker has a screen resolution of 126x294 which is higher than that of 78.4% of fitness trackers and equal to that of 1.7% of fitness trackers.
Pixel density
291 ppi
Pixel density
291 ppi
This fitness tracker has a pixel density of 291 ppi which is higher than that of 77.8% of fitness trackers and equal to that of 2.8% of fitness trackers.
Show more
Form factor
wristband
Hybrid design
no
Hybrid design
no
This fitness tracker does not support Hybrid design. 2.4% of fitness trackers support Hybrid design.
Designed for kids
no
Designed for kids
no
This fitness tracker is not designed for kids. 2.4% of fitness trackers are designed for kids.
Replaceable watch band
yes
Replaceable watch band
yes
This fitness tracker has a replaceable watch band. 25.6% of fitness trackers have a replaceable watch band.
Band width
14 mm
Show more

Samsung Galaxy FIT2 vs the average fitness tracker

246810TotalHealthSports & NavigationBatteryDisplayConnectivitySmart FeaturesDesign & DurabilityApp & Wellness
  • 5 days longer battery life
    Battery life
    15 days
    This fitness tracker has a higher battery life than the average fitness tracker (15 days vs 10 days). The average fitness tracker has 10 days of battery life.
    15 days vs 10 days
  • Lower resting heart rate
    Resting heart rate
    yes
    This fitness tracker supports Resting heart rate, while the average fitness tracker does not. 47.7% of fitness trackers support Resting heart rate.
  • Touchscreen
    Touchscreen
    yes
    This fitness tracker has a touchscreen, while the average fitness tracker does not. 43.8% of fitness trackers have a touchscreen.
  • Swim stroke counter
    Swim stroke counter
    yes
    This fitness tracker supports swim stroke counting, while the average fitness tracker does not. 22% of fitness trackers support swim stroke counting.
  • Auto pause
    Auto pause
    yes
    This fitness tracker supports auto pause, while the average fitness tracker does not. 23.2% of fitness trackers support auto pause.
    Running and cycling only.
  • Heart rate alerts
    Fast/slow heart rate alerts
    yes
    This fitness tracker supports high and low heart rate alerts, while the average fitness tracker does not. 34.5% of fitness trackers support high and low heart rate alerts.
    High heart rate alert only.
  • Phone finder support
    Find my phone
    yes
    This fitness tracker supports phone finding, while the average fitness tracker does not. 49.3% of fitness trackers support phone finding.
  • Modern Bluetooth version
    Bluetooth version
    5.1
    This fitness tracker supports a newer Bluetooth version than the average fitness tracker (5.1 vs 4). The average fitness tracker supports Bluetooth 4.0.
    5.1 vs 4.0
  • 15.3% higher user score
    User score
    9.2/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the fitness tracker.
    When it matters
    When you want to know how a fitness tracker performs in daily use and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
    Score distribution
    ▼
    ▼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    Samsung Galaxy FIT2
    the average fitness tracker
    Samsung Galaxy FIT2 has a higher user score than the average fitness tracker (9.22 vs 8.000).
    9.22 vs 8
  • 93.7% more popular
    Samsung Galaxy FIT2 has a higher popularity than the average fitness tracker (9.81 vs 5.1).
    9.81 vs 5.07
  • 10% better value for money
    Samsung Galaxy FIT2 has a higher value-for-money score than the average fitness tracker (8.71 vs 7.9).
    8.71 vs 7.92
  • Lower resting heart rate
    Resting heart rate
    yes
    This fitness tracker supports Resting heart rate, while the average fitness tracker does not. 47.7% of fitness trackers support Resting heart rate.
  • Heart rate alerts
    Fast/slow heart rate alerts
    yes
    This fitness tracker supports high and low heart rate alerts, while the average fitness tracker does not. 34.5% of fitness trackers support high and low heart rate alerts.
    High heart rate alert only.
  • Tracks menstrual cycle
    Menstrual cycle tracking
    yes
    This fitness tracker supports menstrual cycle tracking, while the average fitness tracker does not. 41.7% of fitness trackers support menstrual cycle tracking.
  • Period notifications
    Has period notifications
    yes
    This fitness tracker has period notifications, while the average fitness tracker does not. 31% of fitness trackers have period notifications.
  • Fertile window notifications
    Displays fertile window notifications
    yes
    This fitness tracker displays fertile window notifications, while the average fitness tracker does not. 24.1% of fitness trackers display fertile window notifications.
  • Ovulation prediction
    Predicts ovulation
    yes
    This fitness tracker predicts ovulation, while the average fitness tracker does not. 41.6% of fitness trackers predict ovulation.
  • Cycle start prediction
    Predicts start date
    yes
    This fitness tracker predicts the start date, while the average fitness tracker does not. 42.5% of fitness trackers predict the start date.
  • 5 days longer battery life
    Battery life
    15 days
    This fitness tracker has a higher battery life than the average fitness tracker (15 days vs 10 days). The average fitness tracker has 10 days of battery life.
    15 days vs 10 days
  • 44.5% larger battery capacity
    Battery capacity
    159 mAh
    This fitness tracker has a higher battery capacity than the average fitness tracker (159 mAh vs 110 mAh). The average fitness tracker has 110 mAh of battery capacity.
    159 mAh vs 110 mAh
  • Touchscreen
    Touchscreen
    yes
    This fitness tracker has a touchscreen, while the average fitness tracker does not. 43.8% of fitness trackers have a touchscreen.
  • Color display
    Color display
    yes
    This fitness tracker has a color display, while the average fitness tracker does not. 37.7% of fitness trackers have a color display.
  • Branded damage-resistant glass
    Has branded damage-resistant glass
    yes
    This fitness tracker uses branded damage-resistant glass, while the average fitness tracker does not. 22.2% of fitness trackers use branded damage-resistant glass.
    Panda Glass.
  • 18.8% higher pixel density
    Pixel density
    291 ppi
    This fitness tracker has a higher pixel density than the average fitness tracker (291 ppi vs 245 ppi). The average fitness tracker has a pixel density of 245 ppi.
    291 ppi vs 245 ppi
  • Durable display glass
    Display glass type
    panda glass
    This fitness tracker uses more durable display glass than the average fitness tracker (panda glass vs glass). The average fitness tracker uses glass display glass.
    panda glass vs glass
  • Modern Bluetooth version
    Bluetooth version
    5.1
    This fitness tracker supports a newer Bluetooth version than the average fitness tracker (5.1 vs 4). The average fitness tracker supports Bluetooth 4.0.
    5.1 vs 4.0
  • Phone finder support
    Find my phone
    yes
    This fitness tracker supports phone finding, while the average fitness tracker does not. 49.3% of fitness trackers support phone finding.
  • Call control
    Call control
    yes
    This fitness tracker supports call controls, while the average fitness tracker does not. 41.5% of fitness trackers support call controls.
    Reject/mute only.
  • Calendar sync
    Calendar sync
    yes
    This fitness tracker supports calendar sync, while the average fitness tracker does not. 20.2% of fitness trackers support calendar sync.
    Includes a calendar widget for synced phone events.
  • Camera remote control
    Camera remote control
    yes
    This fitness tracker supports camera remote control, while the average fitness tracker does not. 38.9% of fitness trackers support camera remote control.
    Galaxy phone required.
  • 40% lighter
    Thickness
    15 g mm
    This fitness tracker is lighter than the average fitness tracker (15 g vs 25 g). The average fitness tracker weighs 25 g.
    15 g vs 25 g
  • Tracks calorie intake
    Calorie intake tracking
    yes
    This fitness tracker supports calorie intake tracking, while the average fitness tracker does not. 39.3% of fitness trackers support calorie intake tracking.
  • Water intake tracking
    Water intake tracking
    yes
    This fitness tracker supports water intake tracking, while the average fitness tracker does not. 42% of fitness trackers support water intake tracking.
    Includes a native hydration widget.
  • No exercise tagging
    Exercise tagging
    no
    This fitness tracker does not support exercise tagging, while the average fitness tracker does. 58.4% of fitness trackers support exercise tagging.
  • Lower screen resolution
    Screen resolution
    126 x 294
    This fitness tracker has a lower screen resolution than the average fitness tracker (126x294 vs 194x368). The average fitness tracker has a screen resolution of 194x368.
    126x294 vs 194x368
  • 5.8 mm greater height
    Height
    46.6 mm
    This fitness tracker is taller than the average fitness tracker (46.6 mm vs 40.8 mm). The average fitness tracker has a height of 40.8 mm.
    46.6 mm vs 40.8 mm
  • 10 °C lower maximum operating temperature
    Max operating temperature
    35 °C
    This fitness tracker has a lower maximum operating temperature than the average fitness tracker (35 °C vs 45 °C). The average fitness tracker supports a maximum operating temperature of 45 °C.
    Thermal alerts can begin above 35 C.
    35 °C vs 45 °C
  • Lower screen resolution
    Screen resolution
    126 x 294
    This fitness tracker has a lower screen resolution than the average fitness tracker (126x294 vs 194x368). The average fitness tracker has a screen resolution of 194x368.
    126x294 vs 194x368
  • 5.8 mm greater height
    Height
    46.6 mm
    This fitness tracker is taller than the average fitness tracker (46.6 mm vs 40.8 mm). The average fitness tracker has a height of 40.8 mm.
    46.6 mm vs 40.8 mm
  • 10 °C lower maximum operating temperature
    Max operating temperature
    35 °C
    This fitness tracker has a lower maximum operating temperature than the average fitness tracker (35 °C vs 45 °C). The average fitness tracker supports a maximum operating temperature of 45 °C.
    Thermal alerts can begin above 35 C.
    35 °C vs 45 °C

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

W
wareable.com
06/11/2020
Summary of the review
P
pocket-lint.com
03/11/2021
Summary of the review
T
t3.com
25/07/2022
Summary of the review
E
expertreviews.co.uk
03/02/2021
Summary of the review
T
techradar.com
05/08/2022
Summary of the review
T
techadvisor.com
02/12/2020
Summary of the review
R
radiotimes.com
16/03/2021
Summary of the review
D
digitaltrends.com
26/04/2022
Summary of the review
C
consumerreports.org
Undated
Summary of the review
C
coachweb.com
05/10/2022
Summary of the review
T
trustedreviews.com
15/01/2021
Summary of the review
C
chip.de
08/11/2022
Summary of the review
I
inside-digital.de
20/11/2020
Summary of the review
N
notebookcheck.com
03/12/2020
Summary of the review
C
connect.de
21/04/2021
Summary of the review
C
chip.de
16/01/2021
Summary of the review
C
computerbild.de
02/12/2020
Summary of the review
N
notebookcheck.biz
07/12/2020
Summary of the review
E
esbellsa.com
08/03/2026
Summary of the review
T
techprincess.it
11/01/2021
Summary of the review
M
mistergadget.tech
07/11/2020
Summary of the review
T
tech.everyeye.it
26/11/2020
Summary of the review
S
smartworld.it
12/11/2020
Summary of the review
H
hardloopzone.nl
Geen exacte datum vermeld
Summary of the review
T
tweakers.net
24/01/2021
Summary of the review

Third-party reviews

Based on 10,883 buyer reviews from online shops.
Reviews last updated: June 2026 · How we calculate this

What we like about Samsung Galaxy FIT2

  • Exceptional battery life, often lasting up to two weeks on a single charge
  • Vibrant 1.1-inch AMOLED display with bright colors and clear text
  • Affordable price point, offering high value compared to competitors
  • Lightweight and comfortable design suitable for all-day wear and sleep
  • Reliable automatic workout detection and helpful movement reminders
  • Seamless integration with the Samsung Health ecosystem and Galaxy Wearable app

What we don't like about Samsung Galaxy FIT2

  • Lack of built-in GPS, requiring a connected smartphone for location tracking
  • Questionable heart rate and step count accuracy during high-intensity training
  • Fiddly and difficult-to-use strap clasp design
  • Absence of advanced features like NFC for mobile payments or blood oxygen (SpO2) monitoring
  • Capacitive touch button can be difficult to see or interact with in certain lighting
  • Build materials feel somewhat cheap and are prone to scratches over time

Verdict

The Samsung Galaxy Fit2 is a lightweight 21g fitness tracker featuring a vibrant 1.1-inch AMOLED 3D glass display with a 126 x 294 resolution and 5ATM water resistance. Key characteristics include automatic workout detection for five activities, stress monitoring, sleep analysis, and a hand-washing timer, all powered by a 159mAh battery offering up to 15–21 days of life. Its main pros are the slim, comfortable design, exceptional battery longevity for its class, and seamless integration with the Samsung Health ecosystem for comprehensive data syncing. However, it lacks built-in GPS and an altimeter, and some users find the 'tuck-in' strap clasp fiddly or uncomfortable during long-term wear.

Compare Samsung Galaxy FIT2 with other products in the Fitness trackers category

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Samsung Galaxy FIT2 and other products in the Fitness trackers category

No results found