Scored using Fitness trackers Methodology v1.0
Fitness trackers Methodology v1.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are evaluated mathematically under Frontumo Fitness trackers Methodology v1.0 using verified laboratory benchmarks, technical specifications, and authentic consumer ratings with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Fitness trackers Methodology v1.0

Samsung Galaxy Fit E Review | 171 Data compared

Avg. price:~£35Battery life:7 daysScreen size:0.74 inchHeart rate monitor:yesGPS:noWaterproof depth rating:50 m

Samsung Galaxy Fit E Review: Compare 171 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Fitness trackers category and whether it is worth buying.

7.0

Overall score

Score
7.0/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the fitness tracker's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best fitness trackers on the market.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

80%

6.6

Technical score

20%

8.5

User score

â–¼Worse than 52% of fitness-trackers
6.6

Technical score

Technical score
6.6/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Fitness trackers category across these key areas: Health, Sports & Navigation, Smart Features, App & Wellness, Connectivity, Battery, Display, Design & Durability.
When it matters
When you want to compare fitness trackers based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

20%

7.2

Sports & Navigation

20%

4.8

Battery

18%

7.0

Health

18%

5.6

Display

8%

7.2

Smart Features

8%

9.0

App & Wellness

4%

7.8

Connectivity

4%

9.1

Design & Durability

â–¼Worse than 65% of fitness-trackers
8.5

User score

User score
8.5/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the fitness tracker.
When it matters
When you want to know how a fitness tracker performs in daily use and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

8.3

User ratings

30%

9.0

Number of reviews

Based on 4,662 buyer reviews from online shops.
How we calculate this
User ratings – average star rating across all shop listings, weighted by how many reviews each has, on a 1–10 scale.
Number of reviews – how many buyer reviews the product has, on a logarithmic scale; the 8% most-reviewed models in the category get 10.
â–²Better than 79% of fitness-trackers
  • samsung-galaxy-fit-e
  • samsung-galaxy-fit-e
  • samsung-galaxy-fit-e
  • samsung-galaxy-fit-e
  • samsung-galaxy-fit-e
samsung-galaxy-fit-e
samsung-galaxy-fit-e
samsung-galaxy-fit-e
samsung-galaxy-fit-e
samsung-galaxy-fit-e

Best prices

*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.

Best rankings

Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Loading...
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of fitness tracker Samsung Galaxy Fit E

Technical score
Technical score
6.6/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Fitness trackers category across these key areas: Health, Sports & Navigation, Smart Features, App & Wellness, Connectivity, Battery, Display, Design & Durability.
When it matters
When you want to compare fitness trackers based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

20%

7.2

Sports & Navigation

20%

4.8

Battery

18%

7.0

Health

18%

5.6

Display

8%

7.2

Smart Features

8%

9.0

App & Wellness

4%

7.8

Connectivity

4%

9.1

Design & Durability

6.6
User score
User score
8.5/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the fitness tracker.
When it matters
When you want to know how a fitness tracker performs in daily use and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

8.3

User ratings

30%

9.0

Number of reviews

Based on 4,662 buyer reviews from online shops.
How we calculate this
User ratings – average star rating across all shop listings, weighted by how many reviews each has, on a 1–10 scale.
Number of reviews – how many buyer reviews the product has, on a logarithmic scale; the 8% most-reviewed models in the category get 10.
8.5
Popularity
Popularity
9.0/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the fitness tracker.
When it matters
When you prefer to buy a product chosen and reviewed by many other consumers.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Popularity:
Samsung Galaxy Fit E has a popularity score of 9 points, which is higher than 78.4% of fitness trackers.
9.0
Value for money
Value for money
7.9/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the fitness tracker's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a fitness tracker with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

60%

7.0

Overall score

40%

10

Price

7.9
Heart rate monitor
yes
Heart rate monitor
yes
This fitness tracker supports heart rate monitoring. 40.2% of fitness trackers support heart rate monitoring.
Resting heart rate
yes
Resting heart rate
yes
This fitness tracker supports Resting heart rate. 52.6% of fitness trackers support Resting heart rate.
Fast/slow heart rate alerts
no
Fast/slow heart rate alerts
no
This fitness tracker does not support high and low heart rate alerts. 34.7% of fitness trackers support high and low heart rate alerts.
Irregular heart rate alerts
no
Irregular heart rate alerts
no
This fitness tracker does not support irregular heart rate alerts. 12.4% of fitness trackers support irregular heart rate alerts.
Blood oxygen sensor
no
Blood oxygen sensor
no
This fitness tracker does not have a blood oxygen sensor. 25.4% of fitness trackers have a blood oxygen sensor.
Show more
GPS
no
GPS
no
This fitness tracker does not have GPS. 11% of fitness trackers have GPS.
Satellite systems supported
no
Satellite systems supported
no
This fitness tracker supports no satellite systems which is less versatile than that of 12.2% of fitness trackers and the same as that of 87.8% of fitness trackers.
no satellite positioning support.
GNSS bands supported
no
GNSS bands supported
no
This fitness tracker does not support advanced GNSS bands. 8.9% of fitness trackers support advanced GNSS bands.
Galileo support
no
Galileo support
no
This fitness tracker does not support Galileo. 4.9% of fitness trackers support Galileo.
Acquires GPS faster
no
Acquires GPS faster
no
This fitness tracker does not support faster GPS acquisition. 8.1% of fitness trackers support faster GPS acquisition.
Show more
Notifications
yes
Notifications
yes
This fitness tracker supports notifications. 27.5% of fitness trackers support notifications.
Vibrating alerts
yes
Vibrating alerts
yes
This fitness tracker supports vibration alerts. 16.3% of fitness trackers support vibration alerts.
Call control
yes
Call control
yes
This fitness tracker supports call controls. 58.7% of fitness trackers support call controls.
Reject/mute only.
Call answering
no
Call answering
no
This fitness tracker does not support call answering. 1% of fitness trackers support call answering.
Calendar sync
yes
Calendar sync
yes
This fitness tracker supports calendar sync. 80.2% of fitness trackers support calendar sync.
All events scheduled on the connected phone can sync automatically.
Show more
Activity reports
yes
Activity reports
yes
This fitness tracker supports activity reports. 5.7% of fitness trackers support activity reports.
via Samsung Health
Goal setting
yes
Goal setting
yes
This fitness tracker supports goal setting. 2.4% of fitness trackers support goal setting.
Achievements
yes
Achievements
yes
This fitness tracker supports achievements. 24.3% of fitness trackers support achievements.
Inactivity alerts
yes
Inactivity alerts
yes
This fitness tracker supports inactivity alerts. 23.5% of fitness trackers support inactivity alerts.
Coaching
no
Coaching
no
This fitness tracker does not support coaching. 34% of fitness trackers support coaching.
Show more
Bluetooth version
5
Bluetooth version
5
This fitness tracker supports Bluetooth 5 which is newer than in 74.6% of fitness trackers and equal to that in 16.8% of fitness trackers.
Maximum Bluetooth range
?
NFC
no
NFC
no
This fitness tracker does not have NFC. 13% of fitness trackers have NFC.
Wi-Fi connectivity
?
Wi-Fi version
no
Wi-Fi version
no
This fitness tracker does not support modern Wi-Fi. 1% of fitness trackers support modern Wi-Fi.
no Wi-Fi support.
Show more
Battery life
7 days
Battery life
7 days
This fitness tracker offers a battery life of 7 days which is shorter than that of 53.5% of fitness trackers and equal to that of 22.8% of fitness trackers.
Battery life with GPS on
N/A
Battery life in training mode
?
Battery life in power-saving mode
?
Battery capacity
70 mAh
Battery capacity
70 mAh
This fitness tracker has a battery capacity of 70 mAh which is lower than that of 77.6% of fitness trackers and equal to that of 3.3% of fitness trackers.
Show more
Display
yes
Display
yes
This fitness tracker has a display. 24.1% of fitness trackers have a display.
Screen size
0.74 inch
Screen size
0.74 inch
This fitness tracker has a screen size of 0.74 inch which is smaller than that of 86.7% of fitness trackers and equal to that of 1.4% of fitness trackers.
Display type
PMOLED
Display type
PMOLED
This fitness tracker uses PMOLED display technology which is less advanced than that of 53.9% of fitness trackers and the same as that of 7.7% of fitness trackers.
Screen resolution
128x 64
Screen resolution
128x 64
This fitness tracker has a screen resolution of 128x64 which is higher than that of 52.8% of fitness trackers and equal to that of 2.3% of fitness trackers.
Pixel density
193 ppi
Pixel density
193 ppi
This fitness tracker has a pixel density of 193 ppi which is lower than that of 64.8% of fitness trackers and equal to that of 1.9% of fitness trackers.
Show more
Form factor
wristband
Hybrid design
no
Hybrid design
no
This fitness tracker does not support Hybrid design. 2.4% of fitness trackers support Hybrid design.
Designed for kids
no
Designed for kids
no
This fitness tracker is not designed for kids. 2.4% of fitness trackers are designed for kids.
Replaceable watch band
yes
Replaceable watch band
yes
This fitness tracker has a replaceable watch band. 25.6% of fitness trackers have a replaceable watch band.
Band width
12 mm
Show more

Samsung Galaxy Fit E vs the average fitness tracker

246810TotalHealthSports & NavigationBatteryDisplayConnectivitySmart FeaturesDesign & DurabilityApp & Wellness
  • Lower resting heart rate
    Resting heart rate
    yes
    This fitness tracker supports Resting heart rate, while the average fitness tracker does not. 47.7% of fitness trackers support Resting heart rate.
  • Tracks menstrual cycle
    Menstrual cycle tracking
    yes
    This fitness tracker supports menstrual cycle tracking, while the average fitness tracker does not. 41.7% of fitness trackers support menstrual cycle tracking.
  • 40% lighter
    Thickness
    15 g mm
    This fitness tracker is lighter than the average fitness tracker (15 g vs 25 g). The average fitness tracker weighs 25 g.
    15 g vs 25 g
  • Modern Bluetooth version
    Bluetooth version
    5.0
    This fitness tracker supports a newer Bluetooth version than the average fitness tracker (5 vs 4). The average fitness tracker supports Bluetooth 4.0.
    5.0 vs 4.0
  • Period notifications
    Has period notifications
    yes
    This fitness tracker has period notifications, while the average fitness tracker does not. 31% of fitness trackers have period notifications.
  • Call control
    Call control
    yes
    This fitness tracker supports call controls, while the average fitness tracker does not. 41.5% of fitness trackers support call controls.
    Reject/mute only.
  • Rugged design
    Rugged design
    yes
    This fitness tracker supports Rugged design, while the average fitness tracker does not. 5.4% of fitness trackers support Rugged design.
    MIL-STD-810G rated.
  • Cycle start prediction
    Predicts start date
    yes
    This fitness tracker predicts the start date, while the average fitness tracker does not. 42.5% of fitness trackers predict the start date.
  • 6.3% higher user score
    User score
    8.5/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the fitness tracker.
    When it matters
    When you want to know how a fitness tracker performs in daily use and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
    Score distribution
    â–¼
    â–¼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    Samsung Galaxy Fit E
    the average fitness tracker
    Samsung Galaxy Fit E has a higher user score than the average fitness tracker (8.50 vs 8.000).
    8.5 vs 8
  • Lower resting heart rate
    Resting heart rate
    yes
    This fitness tracker supports Resting heart rate, while the average fitness tracker does not. 47.7% of fitness trackers support Resting heart rate.
  • Tracks menstrual cycle
    Menstrual cycle tracking
    yes
    This fitness tracker supports menstrual cycle tracking, while the average fitness tracker does not. 41.7% of fitness trackers support menstrual cycle tracking.
  • Period notifications
    Has period notifications
    yes
    This fitness tracker has period notifications, while the average fitness tracker does not. 31% of fitness trackers have period notifications.
  • Ovulation prediction
    Predicts ovulation
    yes
    This fitness tracker predicts ovulation, while the average fitness tracker does not. 41.6% of fitness trackers predict ovulation.
  • Cycle start prediction
    Predicts start date
    yes
    This fitness tracker predicts the start date, while the average fitness tracker does not. 42.5% of fitness trackers predict the start date.
  • Modern Bluetooth version
    Bluetooth version
    5.0
    This fitness tracker supports a newer Bluetooth version than the average fitness tracker (5 vs 4). The average fitness tracker supports Bluetooth 4.0.
    5.0 vs 4.0
  • Call control
    Call control
    yes
    This fitness tracker supports call controls, while the average fitness tracker does not. 41.5% of fitness trackers support call controls.
    Reject/mute only.
  • Calendar sync
    Calendar sync
    yes
    This fitness tracker supports calendar sync, while the average fitness tracker does not. 20.2% of fitness trackers support calendar sync.
    All events scheduled on the connected phone can sync automatically.
  • 40% lighter
    Thickness
    15 g mm
    This fitness tracker is lighter than the average fitness tracker (15 g vs 25 g). The average fitness tracker weighs 25 g.
    15 g vs 25 g
  • Rugged design
    Rugged design
    yes
    This fitness tracker supports Rugged design, while the average fitness tracker does not. 5.4% of fitness trackers support Rugged design.
    MIL-STD-810G rated.
  • Water intake tracking
    Water intake tracking
    yes
    This fitness tracker supports water intake tracking, while the average fitness tracker does not. 42% of fitness trackers support water intake tracking.
  • No pace measurement
    Measures pace
    no
    This fitness tracker does not support pace measurement, while the average fitness tracker does. 61.7% of fitness trackers support pace measurement.
  • Lower screen resolution
    Screen resolution
    128 x 64
    This fitness tracker has a lower screen resolution than the average fitness tracker (128x64 vs 194x368). The average fitness tracker has a screen resolution of 194x368.
    128x64 vs 194x368
  • No exercise tagging
    Exercise tagging
    no
    This fitness tracker does not support exercise tagging, while the average fitness tracker does. 58.4% of fitness trackers support exercise tagging.
  • 3 days shorter battery life
    Battery life
    7 days
    This fitness tracker has a lower battery life than the average fitness tracker (7 days vs 10 days). The average fitness tracker has 10 days of battery life.
    7 days vs 10 days
  • No sleep reports
    Provides sleep reports
    no
    This fitness tracker does not support sleep reports, while the average fitness tracker does. 84.8% of fitness trackers support sleep reports.
  • 0.3 inch smaller screen size
    Screen size
    0.74 inch
    This fitness tracker has a lower screen size than the average fitness tracker (0.7 inch vs 1.04 inch). The average fitness tracker has a screen size of 1.04 inch.
    0.74 inch vs 1.04 inch
  • 36.4% smaller battery capacity
    Battery capacity
    70 mAh
    This fitness tracker has a lower battery capacity than the average fitness tracker (70 mAh vs 110 mAh). The average fitness tracker has 110 mAh of battery capacity.
    70 mAh vs 110 mAh
  • 21.2% lower pixel density
    Pixel density
    193 ppi
    This fitness tracker has a lower pixel density than the average fitness tracker (193 ppi vs 245 ppi). The average fitness tracker has a pixel density of 245 ppi.
    193 ppi vs 245 ppi
  • No sleep reports
    Provides sleep reports
    no
    This fitness tracker does not support sleep reports, while the average fitness tracker does. 84.8% of fitness trackers support sleep reports.
  • 3 days shorter battery life
    Battery life
    7 days
    This fitness tracker has a lower battery life than the average fitness tracker (7 days vs 10 days). The average fitness tracker has 10 days of battery life.
    7 days vs 10 days
  • 36.4% smaller battery capacity
    Battery capacity
    70 mAh
    This fitness tracker has a lower battery capacity than the average fitness tracker (70 mAh vs 110 mAh). The average fitness tracker has 110 mAh of battery capacity.
    70 mAh vs 110 mAh
  • Lower screen resolution
    Screen resolution
    128 x 64
    This fitness tracker has a lower screen resolution than the average fitness tracker (128x64 vs 194x368). The average fitness tracker has a screen resolution of 194x368.
    128x64 vs 194x368
  • 0.3 inch smaller screen size
    Screen size
    0.74 inch
    This fitness tracker has a lower screen size than the average fitness tracker (0.7 inch vs 1.04 inch). The average fitness tracker has a screen size of 1.04 inch.
    0.74 inch vs 1.04 inch
  • 21.2% lower pixel density
    Pixel density
    193 ppi
    This fitness tracker has a lower pixel density than the average fitness tracker (193 ppi vs 245 ppi). The average fitness tracker has a pixel density of 245 ppi.
    193 ppi vs 245 ppi
  • Basic display glass
    Display glass type
    acrylic
    This fitness tracker uses less durable display glass than the average fitness tracker (acrylic vs glass). The average fitness tracker uses glass display glass.
    acrylic vs glass
  • No stopwatch
    Stopwatch
    no
    This fitness tracker does not have a stopwatch, while the average fitness tracker does. 59.7% of fitness trackers have a stopwatch.
  • 10 °C lower maximum operating temperature
    Max operating temperature
    35 °C
    This fitness tracker has a lower maximum operating temperature than the average fitness tracker (35 °C vs 45 °C). The average fitness tracker supports a maximum operating temperature of 45 °C.
    Thermal alerts can begin above 35 C.
    35 °C vs 45 °C

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

C
consumerreports.org
01/05/2019
Summary of the review
R
root-nation.com
04/06/2019
Summary of the review
S
sammobile.com
18/06/2019
Summary of the review
E
expertreviews.co.uk
15/11/2019
Summary of the review
W
wareable.com
08/07/2019
Summary of the review
T
techradar.com
07/07/2019
Summary of the review
C
computerbild.de
12/06/2019
Summary of the review
N
nextpit.de
13/05/2019
Summary of the review
G
giga.de
22/06/2019
Summary of the review
C
computerbild.de
19/06/2019
Summary of the review
C
chip.de
25/07/2019
Summary of the review
C
connect.de
29/08/2019
Summary of the review
N
netzwelt.de
17/07/2019
Summary of the review
G
giga.de
22/06/2019
Summary of the review
F
fr.root-nation.com
04/06/2019
Summary of the review
T
test-achats.be
12/06/2019
Summary of the review
E
es.root-nation.com
04/06/2019
Summary of the review
T
tuttoandroid.net
20/02/2019
Summary of the review
S
smartworld.it
26/09/2021
Summary of the review
T
tuttoandroid.net
31/05/2019
Summary of the review
T
test-aankoop.be
22/10/2026
Summary of the review
W
wonen.nl
22/10/2026
Summary of the review

Third-party reviews

Based on 4,662 buyer reviews from online shops.
Reviews last updated: June 2026 · How we calculate this

What we like about Samsung Galaxy Fit E

  • Highly affordable, budget-friendly price point
  • Slim, lightweight, and comfortable design for all-day wear and sleep
  • Automatic activity tracking for walks and runs works reliably
  • Accurate sleep and basic heart rate monitoring for its class
  • Water-resistant (5ATM) and suitable for swimming or showering
  • Simple interface that covers essential health metrics

What we don't like about Samsung Galaxy Fit E

  • Battery life often falls short of the advertised 7 days, typically lasting 3-4 days
  • Monochrome, low-resolution display can be difficult to read in direct sunlight
  • Lacks a true touchscreen; users must 'tap' the device to cycle through screens
  • Missing advanced features like a stopwatch, timer, or GPS
  • Limited notification interaction; users can see who messaged but often not the content
  • Inconsistent step counting and heart rate tracking during intense interval training

Verdict

The Samsung Galaxy Fit E is an ultra-lightweight entry-level fitness tracker weighing just 15g, featuring a 0.74-inch monochrome PMOLED display (128 x 64 resolution) and a 70mAh battery designed to last up to 6–7 days with typical use. Running on FreeRTOS, it includes a heart rate sensor and accelerometer to support automatic workout detection for walking, running, and dynamic activities, alongside sleep tracking and 5ATM water resistance up to 50 meters. Main pros include its extremely comfortable, slim design, MIL-STD-810G military-grade durability, and seamless integration with the Samsung Health ecosystem. However, notable cons include the lack of a touchscreen (relying on single/double taps to cycle screens), no built-in GPS, poor outdoor visibility in direct sunlight, and the inability to check battery levels directly on the device without the companion app.

Compare Samsung Galaxy Fit E with other products in the Fitness trackers category

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Samsung Galaxy Fit E and other products in the Fitness trackers category

No results found