Scored using Fitness trackers Methodology v1.0
Fitness trackers Methodology v1.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are evaluated mathematically under Frontumo Fitness trackers Methodology v1.0 using verified laboratory benchmarks, technical specifications, and authentic consumer ratings with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Fitness trackers Methodology v1.0

Samsung Galaxy Fit Review | 171 Data compared

Avg. price:~£35Battery life:7 daysScreen size:0.95 inchHeart rate monitor:yesGPS:noWaterproof depth rating:50 m

Samsung Galaxy Fit Review: Compare 171 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Fitness trackers category and whether it is worth buying.

7.8

Overall score

Score
7.8/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the fitness tracker's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best fitness trackers on the market.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

80%

7.7

Technical score

20%

8.1

User score

â–²Better than 76% of fitness-trackers
7.7

Technical score

Technical score
7.7/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Fitness trackers category across these key areas: Health, Sports & Navigation, Smart Features, App & Wellness, Connectivity, Battery, Display, Design & Durability.
When it matters
When you want to compare fitness trackers based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

20%

9.1

Sports & Navigation

20%

5.2

Battery

18%

8.2

Health

18%

7.1

Display

8%

8.0

Smart Features

8%

9.5

App & Wellness

4%

7.8

Connectivity

4%

8.6

Design & Durability

â–²Better than 75% of fitness-trackers
8.1

User score

User score
8.1/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the fitness tracker.
When it matters
When you want to know how a fitness tracker performs in daily use and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

8.4

User ratings

30%

7.4

Number of reviews

Based on 888 buyer reviews from online shops.
How we calculate this
User ratings – average star rating across all shop listings, weighted by how many reviews each has, on a 1–10 scale.
Number of reviews – how many buyer reviews the product has, on a logarithmic scale; the 8% most-reviewed models in the category get 10.
â–²Better than 72% of fitness-trackers
  • samsung-galaxy-fit
  • samsung-galaxy-fit
  • samsung-galaxy-fit
  • samsung-galaxy-fit
  • samsung-galaxy-fit
  • samsung-galaxy-fit
  • samsung-galaxy-fit
  • samsung-galaxy-fit
samsung-galaxy-fit
samsung-galaxy-fit
samsung-galaxy-fit
samsung-galaxy-fit
samsung-galaxy-fit
samsung-galaxy-fit
samsung-galaxy-fit
samsung-galaxy-fit

Best prices

*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.

Best rankings

Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Loading...
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of fitness tracker Samsung Galaxy Fit

Technical score
Technical score
7.7/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Fitness trackers category across these key areas: Health, Sports & Navigation, Smart Features, App & Wellness, Connectivity, Battery, Display, Design & Durability.
When it matters
When you want to compare fitness trackers based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

20%

9.1

Sports & Navigation

20%

5.2

Battery

18%

8.2

Health

18%

7.1

Display

8%

8.0

Smart Features

8%

9.5

App & Wellness

4%

7.8

Connectivity

4%

8.6

Design & Durability

7.7
User score
User score
8.1/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the fitness tracker.
When it matters
When you want to know how a fitness tracker performs in daily use and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

8.4

User ratings

30%

7.4

Number of reviews

Based on 888 buyer reviews from online shops.
How we calculate this
User ratings – average star rating across all shop listings, weighted by how many reviews each has, on a 1–10 scale.
Number of reviews – how many buyer reviews the product has, on a logarithmic scale; the 8% most-reviewed models in the category get 10.
8.1
Popularity
Popularity
7.4/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the fitness tracker.
When it matters
When you prefer to buy a product chosen and reviewed by many other consumers.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Popularity:
Samsung Galaxy Fit has a popularity score of 7.4 points, which is higher than 65.3% of fitness trackers.
7.4
Value for money
Value for money
8.4/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the fitness tracker's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a fitness tracker with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

60%

7.8

Overall score

40%

10

Price

8.4
Heart rate monitor
yes
Heart rate monitor
yes
This fitness tracker supports heart rate monitoring. 40.2% of fitness trackers support heart rate monitoring.
Resting heart rate
yes
Resting heart rate
yes
This fitness tracker supports Resting heart rate. 52.6% of fitness trackers support Resting heart rate.
Fast/slow heart rate alerts
yes
Fast/slow heart rate alerts
yes
This fitness tracker supports high and low heart rate alerts. 65.8% of fitness trackers support high and low heart rate alerts.
High heart rate alert only.
Irregular heart rate alerts
no
Irregular heart rate alerts
no
This fitness tracker does not support irregular heart rate alerts. 12.4% of fitness trackers support irregular heart rate alerts.
Blood oxygen sensor
no
Blood oxygen sensor
no
This fitness tracker does not have a blood oxygen sensor. 25.4% of fitness trackers have a blood oxygen sensor.
Show more
GPS
no
GPS
no
This fitness tracker does not have GPS. 11% of fitness trackers have GPS.
Satellite systems supported
no
Satellite systems supported
no
This fitness tracker supports no satellite systems which is less versatile than that of 12.2% of fitness trackers and the same as that of 87.8% of fitness trackers.
GNSS bands supported
no
GNSS bands supported
no
This fitness tracker does not support advanced GNSS bands. 8.9% of fitness trackers support advanced GNSS bands.
Galileo support
no
Galileo support
no
This fitness tracker does not support Galileo. 4.9% of fitness trackers support Galileo.
Acquires GPS faster
no
Acquires GPS faster
no
This fitness tracker does not support faster GPS acquisition. 8.1% of fitness trackers support faster GPS acquisition.
Show more
Notifications
yes
Notifications
yes
This fitness tracker supports notifications. 27.5% of fitness trackers support notifications.
Vibrating alerts
yes
Vibrating alerts
yes
This fitness tracker supports vibration alerts. 16.3% of fitness trackers support vibration alerts.
Call control
yes
Call control
yes
This fitness tracker supports call controls. 58.7% of fitness trackers support call controls.
Reject/mute plus quick replies.
Call answering
no
Call answering
no
This fitness tracker does not support call answering. 1% of fitness trackers support call answering.
Calendar sync
yes
Calendar sync
yes
This fitness tracker supports calendar sync. 80.2% of fitness trackers support calendar sync.
Automatically syncs events from the connected mobile device.
Show more
Activity reports
yes
Activity reports
yes
This fitness tracker supports activity reports. 5.7% of fitness trackers support activity reports.
via Samsung Health
Goal setting
yes
Goal setting
yes
This fitness tracker supports goal setting. 2.4% of fitness trackers support goal setting.
Achievements
yes
Achievements
yes
This fitness tracker supports achievements. 24.3% of fitness trackers support achievements.
Inactivity alerts
yes
Inactivity alerts
yes
This fitness tracker supports inactivity alerts. 23.5% of fitness trackers support inactivity alerts.
Coaching
yes
Coaching
yes
This fitness tracker supports coaching. 66.5% of fitness trackers support coaching.
Running Coach support.
Show more
Bluetooth version
5
Bluetooth version
5
This fitness tracker supports Bluetooth 5 which is newer than in 74.6% of fitness trackers and equal to that in 16.8% of fitness trackers.
Maximum Bluetooth range
10 m
Maximum Bluetooth range
10 m
This fitness tracker offers a Bluetooth range of 10 m which is higher than that of 14.9% of fitness trackers and equal to that of 63.4% of fitness trackers.
NFC
yes
NFC
yes
This fitness tracker has NFC. 87.5% of fitness trackers have NFC.
NFC is for pairing only.
Wi-Fi connectivity
no
Wi-Fi connectivity
no
This fitness tracker does not support Wi-Fi. 1.8% of fitness trackers support Wi-Fi.
Wi-Fi version
no
Wi-Fi version
no
This fitness tracker does not support modern Wi-Fi. 1% of fitness trackers support modern Wi-Fi.
no Wi-Fi support.
Show more
Battery life
7 days
Battery life
7 days
This fitness tracker offers a battery life of 7 days which is shorter than that of 53.5% of fitness trackers and equal to that of 22.8% of fitness trackers.
Battery life with GPS on
N/A
Battery life in training mode
N/A
Battery life in power-saving mode
?
Battery capacity
120 mAh
Battery capacity
120 mAh
This fitness tracker has a battery capacity of 120 mAh which is higher than that of 50.7% of fitness trackers and equal to that of 2.6% of fitness trackers.
Show more
Display
yes
Display
yes
This fitness tracker has a display. 24.1% of fitness trackers have a display.
Screen size
0.95 inch
Screen size
0.95 inch
This fitness tracker has a screen size of 0.95 inch which is smaller than that of 63.6% of fitness trackers and equal to that of 5.6% of fitness trackers.
Display type
AMOLED
Display type
AMOLED
This fitness tracker uses AMOLED display technology which is more advanced than that of 74.9% of fitness trackers and the same as that of 25.1% of fitness trackers.
Screen resolution
120x 240
Screen resolution
120x 240
This fitness tracker has a screen resolution of 120x240 which is higher than that of 72.2% of fitness trackers and equal to that of 4% of fitness trackers.
Pixel density
282 ppi
Pixel density
282 ppi
This fitness tracker has a pixel density of 282 ppi which is higher than that of 56.5% of fitness trackers and equal to that of 15.7% of fitness trackers.
Show more
Form factor
wristband
Hybrid design
no
Hybrid design
no
This fitness tracker does not support Hybrid design. 2.4% of fitness trackers support Hybrid design.
Designed for kids
no
Designed for kids
no
This fitness tracker is not designed for kids. 2.4% of fitness trackers are designed for kids.
Replaceable watch band
yes
Replaceable watch band
yes
This fitness tracker has a replaceable watch band. 25.6% of fitness trackers have a replaceable watch band.
Band width
17.3 mm
Show more

Samsung Galaxy Fit vs the average fitness tracker

246810TotalHealthSports & NavigationBatteryDisplayConnectivitySmart FeaturesDesign & DurabilityApp & Wellness
  • Lower resting heart rate
    Resting heart rate
    yes
    This fitness tracker supports Resting heart rate, while the average fitness tracker does not. 47.7% of fitness trackers support Resting heart rate.
  • Touchscreen
    Touchscreen
    yes
    This fitness tracker has a touchscreen, while the average fitness tracker does not. 43.8% of fitness trackers have a touchscreen.
  • Swim stroke counter
    Swim stroke counter
    yes
    This fitness tracker supports swim stroke counting, while the average fitness tracker does not. 22% of fitness trackers support swim stroke counting.
  • Auto pause
    Auto pause
    yes
    This fitness tracker supports auto pause, while the average fitness tracker does not. 23.2% of fitness trackers support auto pause.
    Specific workouts only.
  • Heart rate alerts
    Fast/slow heart rate alerts
    yes
    This fitness tracker supports high and low heart rate alerts, while the average fitness tracker does not. 34.5% of fitness trackers support high and low heart rate alerts.
    High heart rate alert only.
  • Phone finder support
    Find my phone
    yes
    This fitness tracker supports phone finding, while the average fitness tracker does not. 49.3% of fitness trackers support phone finding.
  • Coaching features
    Coaching
    yes
    This fitness tracker supports coaching, while the average fitness tracker does not. 33.8% of fitness trackers support coaching.
    Running Coach support.
  • Tracks elevation
    Elevation tracking
    yes
    This fitness tracker supports elevation tracking, while the average fitness tracker does not. 27.4% of fitness trackers support elevation tracking.
    Elevation via connected-phone GPS
  • 1.4% higher user score
    User score
    8.1/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the fitness tracker.
    When it matters
    When you want to know how a fitness tracker performs in daily use and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
    Score distribution
    â–¼
    â–¼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    Samsung Galaxy Fit
    the average fitness tracker
    Samsung Galaxy Fit has a higher user score than the average fitness tracker (8.11 vs 8.000).
    8.11 vs 8
  • Lower resting heart rate
    Resting heart rate
    yes
    This fitness tracker supports Resting heart rate, while the average fitness tracker does not. 47.7% of fitness trackers support Resting heart rate.
  • Heart rate alerts
    Fast/slow heart rate alerts
    yes
    This fitness tracker supports high and low heart rate alerts, while the average fitness tracker does not. 34.5% of fitness trackers support high and low heart rate alerts.
    High heart rate alert only.
  • Tracks menstrual cycle
    Menstrual cycle tracking
    yes
    This fitness tracker supports menstrual cycle tracking, while the average fitness tracker does not. 41.7% of fitness trackers support menstrual cycle tracking.
  • Period notifications
    Has period notifications
    yes
    This fitness tracker has period notifications, while the average fitness tracker does not. 31% of fitness trackers have period notifications.
  • Fertile window notifications
    Displays fertile window notifications
    yes
    This fitness tracker displays fertile window notifications, while the average fitness tracker does not. 24.1% of fitness trackers display fertile window notifications.
  • Ovulation prediction
    Predicts ovulation
    yes
    This fitness tracker predicts ovulation, while the average fitness tracker does not. 41.6% of fitness trackers predict ovulation.
  • Cycle start prediction
    Predicts start date
    yes
    This fitness tracker predicts the start date, while the average fitness tracker does not. 42.5% of fitness trackers predict the start date.
  • Low power mode
    Low power mode
    yes
    This fitness tracker supports low power mode, while the average fitness tracker does not. 24.1% of fitness trackers support low power mode.
  • Supports wireless charging
    Wireless charging
    yes
    This fitness tracker supports wireless charging, while the average fitness tracker does not. 2.8% of fitness trackers support wireless charging.
  • Touchscreen
    Touchscreen
    yes
    This fitness tracker has a touchscreen, while the average fitness tracker does not. 43.8% of fitness trackers have a touchscreen.
  • Color display
    Color display
    yes
    This fitness tracker has a color display, while the average fitness tracker does not. 37.7% of fitness trackers have a color display.
  • Branded damage-resistant glass
    Has branded damage-resistant glass
    yes
    This fitness tracker uses branded damage-resistant glass, while the average fitness tracker does not. 22.2% of fitness trackers use branded damage-resistant glass.
    Corning Gorilla Glass.
  • 15.1% higher pixel density
    Pixel density
    282 ppi
    This fitness tracker has a higher pixel density than the average fitness tracker (282 ppi vs 245 ppi). The average fitness tracker has a pixel density of 245 ppi.
    282 ppi vs 245 ppi
  • Modern Bluetooth version
    Bluetooth version
    5.0
    This fitness tracker supports a newer Bluetooth version than the average fitness tracker (5 vs 4). The average fitness tracker supports Bluetooth 4.0.
    5.0 vs 4.0
  • NFC
    NFC
    yes
    This fitness tracker has NFC, while the average fitness tracker does not. 13% of fitness trackers have NFC.
    NFC is for pairing only.
  • Phone finder support
    Find my phone
    yes
    This fitness tracker supports phone finding, while the average fitness tracker does not. 49.3% of fitness trackers support phone finding.
  • Call control
    Call control
    yes
    This fitness tracker supports call controls, while the average fitness tracker does not. 41.5% of fitness trackers support call controls.
    Reject/mute plus quick replies.
  • Calendar sync
    Calendar sync
    yes
    This fitness tracker supports calendar sync, while the average fitness tracker does not. 20.2% of fitness trackers support calendar sync.
    Automatically syncs events from the connected mobile device.
  • 1 more physical buttons
    N. of physical buttons
    1
    This fitness tracker has a higher physical buttons than the average fitness tracker (1 vs 0). The average fitness tracker has 0 of physical buttons.
    1 vs 0
  • Gesture control
    Gesture control
    yes
    This fitness tracker supports gesture controls, while the average fitness tracker does not. 40.8% of fitness trackers support gesture controls.
  • Rugged design
    Rugged design
    yes
    This fitness tracker supports Rugged design, while the average fitness tracker does not. 5.4% of fitness trackers support Rugged design.
    MIL-STD-810G rated.
  • Coaching features
    Coaching
    yes
    This fitness tracker supports coaching, while the average fitness tracker does not. 33.8% of fitness trackers support coaching.
    Running Coach support.
  • Tracks calorie intake
    Calorie intake tracking
    yes
    This fitness tracker supports calorie intake tracking, while the average fitness tracker does not. 39.3% of fitness trackers support calorie intake tracking.
  • Water intake tracking
    Water intake tracking
    yes
    This fitness tracker supports water intake tracking, while the average fitness tracker does not. 42% of fitness trackers support water intake tracking.
  • 3 days shorter battery life
    Battery life
    7 days
    This fitness tracker has a lower battery life than the average fitness tracker (7 days vs 10 days). The average fitness tracker has 10 days of battery life.
    7 days vs 10 days
  • Lower screen resolution
    Screen resolution
    120 x 240
    This fitness tracker has a lower screen resolution than the average fitness tracker (120x240 vs 194x368). The average fitness tracker has a screen resolution of 194x368.
    120x240 vs 194x368
  • 0.09 inch smaller screen size
    Screen size
    0.95 inch
    This fitness tracker has a lower screen size than the average fitness tracker (1 inch vs 1.04 inch). The average fitness tracker has a screen size of 1.04 inch.
    0.95 inch vs 1.04 inch
  • 10 °C lower maximum operating temperature
    Max operating temperature
    35 °C
    This fitness tracker has a lower maximum operating temperature than the average fitness tracker (35 °C vs 45 °C). The average fitness tracker supports a maximum operating temperature of 45 °C.
    Thermal alerts can begin above 35 C.
    35 °C vs 45 °C
  • 3 days shorter battery life
    Battery life
    7 days
    This fitness tracker has a lower battery life than the average fitness tracker (7 days vs 10 days). The average fitness tracker has 10 days of battery life.
    7 days vs 10 days
  • Lower screen resolution
    Screen resolution
    120 x 240
    This fitness tracker has a lower screen resolution than the average fitness tracker (120x240 vs 194x368). The average fitness tracker has a screen resolution of 194x368.
    120x240 vs 194x368
  • 0.09 inch smaller screen size
    Screen size
    0.95 inch
    This fitness tracker has a lower screen size than the average fitness tracker (1 inch vs 1.04 inch). The average fitness tracker has a screen size of 1.04 inch.
    0.95 inch vs 1.04 inch
  • 10 °C lower maximum operating temperature
    Max operating temperature
    35 °C
    This fitness tracker has a lower maximum operating temperature than the average fitness tracker (35 °C vs 45 °C). The average fitness tracker supports a maximum operating temperature of 45 °C.
    Thermal alerts can begin above 35 C.
    35 °C vs 45 °C

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

T
techradar.com
05/07/2019
Summary of the review
T
techadvisor.com
28/11/2019
Summary of the review
H
hitechcentury.com
14/10/2019
Summary of the review
W
wareable.com
19/07/2019
Summary of the review
U
uk.pcmag.com
14/06/2019
Summary of the review
L
lesnumeriques.com
31/01/2020
Summary of the review
S
smartworld.it
30/07/2019
Summary of the review
W
wonen.nl
No date provided
Summary of the review

Third-party reviews

Based on 888 buyer reviews from online shops.
Reviews last updated: June 2026 · How we calculate this

What we like about Samsung Galaxy Fit

  • Bright and vibrant AMOLED display that is easy to read in sunlight
  • Lightweight and slim design makes it comfortable for 24/7 wear and sleep tracking
  • Strong value for the price, offering core fitness features without high costs
  • Impressive battery life, typically lasting 7 to 10 days in real-world use
  • Seamless integration and additional features (like camera control) when used with Samsung phones
  • Fluid and intuitive user interface with responsive touch controls

What we don't like about Samsung Galaxy Fit

  • Lack of built-in GPS requires carrying a phone to track outdoor workout routes
  • No NFC support for contactless payments
  • Inconsistent sleep and step tracking reported by some users compared to high-end devices
  • Limited compatibility; certain features or the entire device may not work with non-Samsung or iOS phones
  • No built-in speaker or microphone for taking calls or using voice assistants

Verdict

The Samsung Galaxy Fit 3 is a lightweight, budget-friendly fitness tracker featuring a 1.6-inch AMOLED display (256 x 402 resolution) housed in a durable aluminum frame. Key characteristics include 5ATM/IP68 water resistance, a 208mAh battery providing up to 13 days of life, and tracking for over 100 exercises alongside sleep, stress, and SpO2 monitoring. Main pros include its vibrant, larger screen, slim design, and seamless integration with the Samsung ecosystem for features like camera control and phone notifications. However, notable cons include the lack of built-in GPS, no microphone or speaker for calls, and its incompatibility with iOS devices.

Compare Samsung Galaxy Fit with other products in the Fitness trackers category

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Samsung Galaxy Fit and other products in the Fitness trackers category

No results found