OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS
Scored using Drones Methodology v2.0
Drones Methodology v2.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontumo Drones Methodology v2.0: technical specifications plus grades from 1,023 independent expert reviews and 2,622 video reviews, with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Drones Methodology v2.0

Holy Stone F181W Review | 97 Data compared

Avg. price:~£55Max flight time:10 minVideo resolution:1080p/25 fpsMax transmission distance:0.1 km

Holy Stone F181W Review: Compare 97 technical specifications and 7 expert and video reviews to see how this product ranks in the Drones category and whether it is worth buying.

5.3

Overall score

Score
5.3/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the drone's quality, based on technical analyses and grades from independent expert reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best drones on the market.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 85% of models
Score components

85%

4.9

Technical score

15%

7.7

Review score ( 1 · 6)

Review score 15% · 7.7 · based on 1 written review + 6 videos
1 written review + 6 videos count as 3.8 of the 4 needed; the rest counts as 7/10. Every model in this category gets the same split: reviews 15%, technical score 85%. A video or a short review counts less than a full test.
â–¼Worse than 85% of drones
4.9

Technical score

Technical score
4.9/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of the drone's technical performance, covering key areas such as flight performance, camera quality, transmission, safety features, battery life, and design.
When it matters
When you want to compare drones based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 85% of models
Score components

26%

4.0

Flight

24%

5.5

Camera

20%

4.0

Safety

16%

5.6

Connectivity

14%

6.0

Battery & Design

â–¼Worse than 85% of drones
7.7

Review score

Review score
7.7/ 10
✕
What it is
Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
How we count it
Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves.
Weighting: Big test sites count more, short reviews half as much as full tests. A video review counts half.
Share: Reviews are 15% of the overall score for every model in this category; each of the 4 needed reviews that is missing counts as 7/10.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 61% of models
Grades by review (7)
1 reviews: 1 with a printed score, 0 estimated from the review. 6 video reviews, each counting half as much as a written test. Share in the overall score: 15%, the same for every model in this category.
Video reviews 5

12.5%

8.0

B4U GO

12.5%

8.0

Drywall Beast87

12.5%

7.0

Sandbar Sofa Surfers (Jeremie Lee Cook)

12.5%

7.0

The Sethioz Project

12.5%

7.0

Sethioz Reviews

estimated from the review
Shop star ratings are not part of this score.
â–¼Worse than 61% of drones
  • holy-stone-f181w
  • holy-stone-f181w
  • holy-stone-f181w
  • holy-stone-f181w
  • holy-stone-f181w
  • holy-stone-f181w
  • holy-stone-f181w
  • holy-stone-f181w
  • holy-stone-f181w
holy-stone-f181w
holy-stone-f181w
holy-stone-f181w
holy-stone-f181w
holy-stone-f181w
holy-stone-f181w
holy-stone-f181w
holy-stone-f181w
holy-stone-f181w

Best prices

*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.

Best rankings

Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of drone Holy Stone F181W

Technical score
Technical score
4.9/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of the drone's technical performance, covering key areas such as flight performance, camera quality, transmission, safety features, battery life, and design.
When it matters
When you want to compare drones based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 85% of models
Score components:

26%

4.0

Flight

24%

5.5

Camera

20%

4.0

Safety

16%

5.6

Connectivity

14%

6.0

Battery & Design

4.9
Review score
Review score
7.7/ 10
✕
What it is
Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
How we count it
Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves.
Weighting: Big test sites count more, short reviews half as much as full tests. A video review counts half.
Share: Reviews are 15% of the overall score for every model in this category; each of the 4 needed reviews that is missing counts as 7/10.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 61% of models
Grades by review (7)
1 reviews: 1 with a printed score, 0 estimated from the review. 6 video reviews, each counting half as much as a written test. Share in the overall score: 15%, the same for every model in this category.
Video reviews 5

12.5%

8.0

B4U GO

12.5%

8.0

Drywall Beast87

12.5%

7.0

Sandbar Sofa Surfers (Jeremie Lee Cook)

12.5%

7.0

The Sethioz Project

12.5%

7.0

Sethioz Reviews

estimated from the review
Shop star ratings are not part of this score.
7.7
Popularity
Popularity
9.3/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the drone.
When it matters
When you prefer to choose a drone reviewed and selected by many other buyers.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 80% of models
Popularity:
Holy Stone F181W has a popularity score of 9.3 points, which is higher than that of 79.7% of products in this category.
9.3
Value for money
Value for money
6.7/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the drone's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a drone with a good balance between flight quality, camera features, and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 76% of models
Score components:

60%

5.3

Overall score

40%

10

Price

6.7
Max flight time
10 min
Max flight time
10 min
â–¼ Worse than 81% of models
Market range: <8 min – >40 min
This drone has a max flight time of 10 min, shorter than 81% of drones and equal to 6% of drones.
Max flight distance
0.1 km
Max flight distance
0.1 km
â–¼ Worse than 75% of models
Market range: <0.05 km – >24 km
This drone has a max flight distance of 0.1 km, shorter-range than 75.1% of drones and equal to 8.8% of drones.
Max flight speed
?
Max wind resistance
7.9 m/s
Max wind resistance
7.9 m/s
â–¼ Worse than 69% of models
Market range: <3.3 m/s – >12 m/s
This drone has max wind resistance of 7.9 m/s, lower than 69.1% of drones and equal to 10.1% of drones.
Max service ceiling (ASL)
100 m
Max service ceiling (ASL)
100 m
â–¼ Worse than 91% of models
Market range: <120 m – >6k m
This drone has a max service ceiling of 100 m, lower than 91% of drones and equal to 6% of drones.
Show more
What reviewers say
Video resolution
1080p/25 fps
Video resolution
1080p/25 fps
â–¼ Worse than 68% of models
This drone records video at 1080p/25 fps, lower than 68.3% of drones and equal to 2% of drones.
4K camera
no
4K camera
no
â–¼ Worse than 55% of models
This drone does not support 4K video. 54.6% of drones support 4K video.
Sensor size
?
Main camera megapixels
2.07 MP
Main camera megapixels
2.07 MP
â–¼ Worse than 81% of models
Market range: <2 MP – >48 MP
This drone has a main camera resolution of 2.07 MP, lower than 81.3% of drones and equal to 3.3% of drones.
Max movie bitrate
?
Show more
What reviewers say
Obstacle detection
no
Obstacle detection
no
â–¼ Worse than 31% of models
This drone does not support obstacle detection. 31% of drones support obstacle detection.
Return to Home (RTH)
no
Return to Home (RTH)
no
â–¼ Worse than 68% of models
This drone does not support Return-to-Home (RTH). 67.5% of drones support Return-to-Home (RTH).
GPS
no
GPS
no
â–¼ Worse than 65% of models
This drone does not support GPS. 65.2% of drones support GPS.
GNSS systems supported
none
GNSS systems supported
none
â–¼ Worse than 66% of models
This drone supports none GNSS systems, which are less comprehensive than those of 65.8% and the same as those of 34.2%.
Obstacle sensing directions
N/A
Show more
What reviewers say
Max transmission distance
0.1 km
Max transmission distance
0.1 km
â–¼ Worse than 72% of models
Market range: <0.05 km – >15 km
This drone has a max transmission distance of 0.1 km, shorter-range than 71.9% of drones and equal to 6.1% of drones.
Transmission latency
?
Video transmission system
Wi-Fi
Video transmission system
Wi-Fi
â–¼ Worse than 44% of models
This drone uses Wi-Fi for video transmission, which is more advanced than the system used by 8.2% and the same as that used by 47.7%.
Live view quality
720p@30 fps
Live view quality
720p@30 fps
â–¼ Worse than 57% of models
This drone offers live view quality of 720p@30 fps, lower-quality than 56.8% of drones and equal to 22.9% of drones.
Remote control
yes
Remote control
yes
â–² Better than 5% of models
This drone has a handheld remote controller. 5% of drones offer this.
Show more
What reviewers say
Battery capacity
750 mAh
Battery capacity
750 mAh
â–¼ Worse than 86% of models
Market range: <550 mAh – >5k mAh
This drone has a battery capacity of 750 mAh, smaller than 86% of drones and equal to 1.6% of drones.
Battery energy
2.775 Wh
Battery energy
2.775 Wh
â–¼ Worse than 92% of models
Market range: <3.7 Wh – >77 Wh
This drone has battery energy of 2.775 Wh, lower than 92.4% of drones and equal to 0.6% of drones.
Charging time
60 min
Charging time
60 min
â–² Better than 80% of models
Market range: <55 min – >180 min
This drone charges in 60 min, faster than 80% of drones and equal to 8.8% of drones.
Weight
139 g
Weight
139 g
â–² Better than 77% of models
Market range: <80 g – >920 g
This drone weighs 139 g, lighter than 77.3% of drones.
Removable battery
yes
Removable battery
yes
â–² Better than 1% of models
This drone has a removable battery. 0.5% of drones have a removable battery.
Show more

Holy Stone F181W vs the average drone

246810TotalFlightCameraSafetyConnectivityBattery & Design
  • 30 min shorter charging time
    Charging time
    60 min
    â–² Better than 80% of models
    Market range: <55 min – >180 min
    This drone charges faster than the average drone (60 min vs 90 min). The average drone charges in 90 min.
    60 min vs 90 min
  • 43.5% lower weight
    Weight
    139 g
    â–² Better than 77% of models
    Market range: <80 g – >920 g
    This drone is lighter than the average drone (139 g vs 246 g). The average drone weighs 246 g.
    139 g vs 246 g
  • Supports smartphone control
    Smartphone control
    yes
    â–² Better than 50% of models
    This drone supports smartphone control, while the average drone does not.
  • 30 ° wider field of view
    Field of view
    120 °
    â–² Better than 70% of models
    Market range: <79 ° – >130 °
    This drone has a wider field of view than the average drone (120 ° vs 90 °). The average drone has a field of view of 90 °.
    120 ° vs 90 °
  • More modern charging port
    Charging interface
    proprietary
    â–¼ Worse than 42% of models
    This drone uses proprietary for charging, while the average drone uses micro-USB.
    proprietary vs micro-USB
  • 3.64x cheaper
    Holy Stone F181W is cheaper than the average drone (£55 vs £200).
    £55 vs £200
  • 3.64x cheaper
    Holy Stone F181W is cheaper than the average drone (£55 vs £200).
    £55 vs £200
  • 30 ° wider field of view
    Field of view
    120 °
    â–² Better than 70% of models
    Market range: <79 ° – >130 °
    This drone has a wider field of view than the average drone (120 ° vs 90 °). The average drone has a field of view of 90 °.
    120 ° vs 90 °
  • Supports smartphone control
    Smartphone control
    yes
    â–² Better than 50% of models
    This drone supports smartphone control, while the average drone does not.
  • 30 min shorter charging time
    Charging time
    60 min
    â–² Better than 80% of models
    Market range: <55 min – >180 min
    This drone charges faster than the average drone (60 min vs 90 min). The average drone charges in 90 min.
    60 min vs 90 min
  • 43.5% lower weight
    Weight
    139 g
    â–² Better than 77% of models
    Market range: <80 g – >920 g
    This drone is lighter than the average drone (139 g vs 246 g). The average drone weighs 246 g.
    139 g vs 246 g
  • More modern charging port
    Charging interface
    proprietary
    â–¼ Worse than 42% of models
    This drone uses proprietary for charging, while the average drone uses micro-USB.
    proprietary vs micro-USB
  • Lower video resolution
    Video resolution
    1080p/25 fps
    â–¼ Worse than 68% of models
    This drone offers lower video resolution than the average drone (1080p/25 fps vs 4K/100 fps). The average drone offers a video resolution of 4K/100 fps.
    1080p/25 fps vs 4K/100 fps
  • Fewer GNSS systems
    GNSS systems supported
    none
    â–¼ Worse than 66% of models
    This drone supports none GNSS systems, while the average drone supports GPS, GLONASS, Galileo, BeiDou.
    none vs GPS, GLONASS, Galileo, BeiDou
  • 2.8 m/s lower wind resistance
    Max wind resistance
    7.9 m/s
    â–¼ Worse than 69% of models
    Market range: <3.3 m/s – >12 m/s
    This drone handles weaker wind than the average drone (7.9 m/s vs 10.7 m/s). The average drone handles wind up to 10.7 m/s.
    7.9 m/s vs 10.7 m/s
  • More basic transmission system
    Video transmission system
    Wi-Fi
    â–¼ Worse than 44% of models
    This drone uses Wi-Fi for video transmission, while the average drone uses SkyLink 2.0.
    Wi-Fi vs SkyLink 2.0
  • 10 min shorter flight time
    Max flight time
    10 min
    â–¼ Worse than 81% of models
    Market range: <8 min – >40 min
    This drone offers shorter max flight time than the average drone (10 min vs 20 min). The average drone offers 20 min of max flight time.
    10 min vs 20 min
  • No subject tracking
    Subject tracking
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 61% of models
    This drone cannot track subjects, while the average drone can.
  • No return-to-home (RTH)
    Return to Home (RTH)
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 68% of models
    This drone does not support return-to-home (RTH), while the average drone does.
  • No GPS
    GPS
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 65% of models
    This drone does not have GPS, while the average drone does.
  • 4.9% worse value for money
    Holy Stone F181W has worse value for money than the average drone (6.73 vs 7.1).
    6.73 vs 7.06
  • 2.8 m/s lower wind resistance
    Max wind resistance
    7.9 m/s
    â–¼ Worse than 69% of models
    Market range: <3.3 m/s – >12 m/s
    This drone handles weaker wind than the average drone (7.9 m/s vs 10.7 m/s). The average drone handles wind up to 10.7 m/s.
    7.9 m/s vs 10.7 m/s
  • 10 min shorter flight time
    Max flight time
    10 min
    â–¼ Worse than 81% of models
    Market range: <8 min – >40 min
    This drone offers shorter max flight time than the average drone (10 min vs 20 min). The average drone offers 20 min of max flight time.
    10 min vs 20 min
  • 3,400 m lower service ceiling
    Max service ceiling (ASL)
    100 m
    â–¼ Worse than 91% of models
    Market range: <120 m – >6k m
    This drone can fly at a lower max service ceiling than the average drone (100 m vs 3500 m). The average drone reaches 3500 m.
    100 m vs 3,500 m
  • 6 years older release date
    Release date
    2017
    â–¼ Worse than 95% of models
    Market range: <2k – >2k
    This drone is older than the average drone (2017 vs 2023). The average drone was released in 2023.
    September 2017
    2017 vs 2023
  • 0.9 km shorter flight distance
    Max flight distance
    0.1 km
    â–¼ Worse than 75% of models
    Market range: <0.05 km – >24 km
    This drone has a shorter max flight distance than the average drone (0.1 km vs 1 km). The average drone can fly up to 1 km.
    0.1 km vs 1 km
  • Simpler motor design
    Motor type
    brushed
    â–¼ Worse than 70% of models
    This drone uses brushed motors, while the average drone uses brushless motors.
    brushed vs brushless
  • Non-foldable design
    Foldable design
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 68% of models
    This drone does not have a foldable design, while the average drone does.
  • Lower video resolution
    Video resolution
    1080p/25 fps
    â–¼ Worse than 68% of models
    This drone offers lower video resolution than the average drone (1080p/25 fps vs 4K/100 fps). The average drone offers a video resolution of 4K/100 fps.
    1080p/25 fps vs 4K/100 fps
  • Narrower tilt range
    Camera tilt range
    manual only °
    â–¼ Worse than 74% of models
    This drone has a narrower tilt range than the average drone (manual only ° vs -90 to 20 °).
    manual only ° vs -90 to 20 °
  • Fewer photo format options
    Photo formats supported
    JPEG
    â–¼ Worse than 41% of models
    This drone supports JPEG photo formats, while the average drone supports JPEG, DNG (RAW).
    JPEG vs JPEG, DNG (RAW)
  • Lower photo resolution
    Photo resolution
    1920 x 1080 px
    â–¼ Worse than 68% of models
    This drone offers lower photo resolution than the average drone (1920x1080 px vs 4096x3072 px). The average drone offers a photo resolution of 4096x3072 px.
    1920x1080 px vs 4096x3072 px
  • More basic stabilization
    Image stabilization type
    None (Fixed)
    â–¼ Worse than 64% of models
    This drone uses None (Fixed) image stabilization, while the average drone uses EIS (Digital).
    None (Fixed) vs EIS (Digital)
  • 9.93 MP less camera resolution
    Main camera megapixels
    2.07 MP
    â–¼ Worse than 81% of models
    Market range: <2 MP – >48 MP
    This drone has fewer main camera megapixels than the average drone (2.1 MP vs 12 MP). The average drone has 12 MP on the main camera.
    2.07 MP vs 12 MP
  • 3 x lower digital zoom
    Digital zoom
    0 x
    â–¼ Worse than 59% of models
    Market range: <0 x – >16 x
    This drone offers less digital zoom than the average drone (0 x vs 3 x). The average drone offers 3 x of digital zoom.
    0 x vs 3 x
  • No 4K video
    4K camera
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 55% of models
    This drone does not support 4K video, while the average drone does.
  • 96 GB lower memory card limit
    Max external memory supported
    32 GB
    â–¼ Worse than 60% of models
    Market range: <0 GB – >512 GB
    This drone supports less external storage than the average drone (32 GB vs 128 GB). The average drone supports up to 128 GB of external storage.
    32 GB vs 128 GB
  • Fewer GNSS systems
    GNSS systems supported
    none
    â–¼ Worse than 66% of models
    This drone supports none GNSS systems, while the average drone supports GPS, GLONASS, Galileo, BeiDou.
    none vs GPS, GLONASS, Galileo, BeiDou
  • No subject tracking
    Subject tracking
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 61% of models
    This drone cannot track subjects, while the average drone can.
  • No return-to-home (RTH)
    Return to Home (RTH)
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 68% of models
    This drone does not support return-to-home (RTH), while the average drone does.
  • No GPS
    GPS
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 65% of models
    This drone does not have GPS, while the average drone does.
  • No POI mode
    POI mode
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 66% of models
    This drone does not support POI mode, while the average drone does.
  • 4 fewer flight modes
    N. of intelligent flight modes
    0
    â–¼ Worse than 89% of models
    Market range: <0 – >8
    This drone offers fewer intelligent flight modes than the average drone (0 vs 4). The average drone offers 4 intelligent flight modes.
    0 vs 4
  • No beginner mode
    Beginner mode
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 56% of models
    This drone does not support beginner mode, while the average drone does.
  • 34.5% higher takeoff weight
    Max takeoff weight
    163 g
    â–¼ Worse than 76% of models
    Market range: <80 g – >1.1k g
    This drone has a higher max takeoff weight than the average drone (163 g vs 249 g). The average drone has a max takeoff weight of 249 g.
    163 g vs 249 g
  • More basic transmission system
    Video transmission system
    Wi-Fi
    â–¼ Worse than 44% of models
    This drone uses Wi-Fi for video transmission, while the average drone uses SkyLink 2.0.
    Wi-Fi vs SkyLink 2.0
  • Fewer frequency bands
    Operating frequency bands
    2.4 GHz
    â–¼ Worse than 70% of models
    This drone supports 2.4 GHz operating frequency bands, while the average drone supports 2.4 GHz, 5.8 GHz.
    2.4 GHz vs 2.4 GHz, 5.8 GHz
  • Lower live view quality
    Live view quality
    720p@30 fps
    â–¼ Worse than 57% of models
    This drone has worse live view quality than the average drone (720p@30 fps vs 1080p@25 fps). The average drone offers live view quality of 1080p@25 fps.
    720p@30 fps vs 1080p@25 fps
  • 0.9 km shorter transmission range
    Max transmission distance
    0.1 km
    â–¼ Worse than 72% of models
    Market range: <0.05 km – >15 km
    This drone has a shorter max transmission distance than the average drone (0.1 km vs 1 km). The average drone reaches 1 km of transmission distance.
    0.1 km vs 1 km
  • 1,450 mAh less battery capacity
    Battery capacity
    750 mAh
    â–¼ Worse than 86% of models
    Market range: <550 mAh – >5k mAh
    This drone has a smaller battery capacity than the average drone (750 mAh vs 2200 mAh). The average drone battery has a capacity of 2200 mAh.
    750 mAh vs 2,200 mAh
  • 14.41 Wh less battery energy
    Battery energy
    2.775 Wh
    â–¼ Worse than 92% of models
    Market range: <3.7 Wh – >77 Wh
    This drone has lower battery energy than the average drone (2.8 Wh vs 17.18 Wh). The average drone battery has 17.18 Wh of energy.
    2.775 Wh vs 17.18 Wh
  • 42.5 mm taller body height
    Height
    105 mm
    â–¼ Worse than 80% of models
    Market range: <38 mm – >120 mm
    This drone is taller than the average drone (105 mm vs 62.5 mm). The average drone is 62.5 mm tall.
    105 mm vs 62.5 mm
  • 64 mm wider width
    Width
    305 mm
    â–¼ Worse than 74% of models
    Market range: <114 mm – >387.5 mm
    This drone is wider than the average drone (305 mm vs 241 mm). The average drone width is 241 mm.
    305 mm vs 241 mm
  • 30 mm longer body length
    Length
    305 mm
    â–¼ Worse than 65% of models
    Market range: <117 mm – >385 mm
    This drone is longer than the average drone (305 mm vs 275 mm). The average drone is 275 mm long.
    305 mm vs 275 mm

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

8.0
B4U GO
≈ estimated
26/02/2022
Hands-on review · outdoor flight and features
Verdict
Holy Stone F181W is a budget drone with a nice case, though the 110D is the better flyer.
8.0
Drywall Beast87
≈ estimated
08/01/2021
Unboxing · first flight and short test
Verdict
Holy Stone F181W is recommended as a fun, affordable stunt drone, though its signal dropped at about 30 feet.
7.0
Sandbar Sofa Surfers (Jeremie Lee Cook)
≈ estimated
22/10/2020
Hands-on review · range and video quality
Verdict
Holy Stone F181W is a decent beginner drone for the price, but shaky footage and short range hold it back.
7.0
The Sethioz Project
≈ estimated
10/11/2017
Hands-on review · unboxing, flights and app test
Verdict
Holy Stone F181W flies well, but its app and camera let it down.
7.0
Sethioz Reviews
≈ estimated
09/11/2017
Hands-on review · unboxing, flights and app test
Verdict
Holy Stone F181W flies well, but its app and camera let it down.
Hands-on video, no verdict
Overview video
Hands-on video, no verdict

What reviewers agree on

Based on 1 · 6

Reviewers like the generous extras and easy handling, but the app and build quality disappoint, and opinions on the camera are split.
Praised
Mixed views
Criticised
Pick a topic to see who said what

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

8.8
moonandback.com
✓ explicit
25/01/2024
Expert review · Beginner quadcopter
Verdict
The Holy Stone F181W is a ready-to-fly beginner quadcopter with two batteries and altitude hold, but it drifts in the slightest breeze and has no GPS.
8.8
moonandback.com
✓ explicit
25/01/2024
Expert review · Beginner quadcopter
Verdict
The Holy Stone F181W is a ready-to-fly beginner quadcopter with two batteries and altitude hold, but it drifts in the slightest breeze and has no GPS.

Third-party reviews

Read buyer reviews on Amazon →

What we like about Holy Stone F181W

  • User-friendly for beginners due to intuitive controls and headless mode
  • Altitude hold feature provides stable hovering for easier photography
  • Includes two batteries and parallel charging cables, doubling initial flight time
  • Lightweight but durable enough to withstand minor crashes
  • Comes with various accessories including a carrying case, extra propellers, and prop guards
  • Fun maneuverability with 360-degree flip capabilities and four speed settings

What we don't like about Holy Stone F181W

  • Susceptible to drifting even in light winds due to its low weight
  • Camera quality can be shaky or blurry, with some users finding the 720p resolution underwhelming
  • FPV video transmission over WiFi often has significant lag and limited range
  • Reported issues with motor reliability, with some burning out after early flights
  • Battery life is relatively short, typically lasting only 8 to 10 minutes per charge
  • Lacks GPS for automatic return-to-home, making it easy to lose in windy conditions

Verdict

The Holy Stone F181W is an entry-level quadcopter built for beginners, with a Wi-Fi camera, simple FPV viewing, and familiar training features such as headless mode and one-key tricks. Its appeal comes from easy handling and low cost rather than advanced camera or GPS hardware, making it more of a fun starter drone than a serious imaging tool. The main advantages are simplicity, affordability, and a light learning curve. The downsides are limited image quality, weaker stability than GPS-equipped models, and a generally basic overall feature set.

Compare Holy Stone F181W with other drones

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Holy Stone F181W and other drones

No results found