OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS
Scored using Drones Methodology v2.0
Drones Methodology v2.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontumo Drones Methodology v2.0: technical specifications plus grades from 1,110 independent expert reviews and 2,622 video reviews, with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Drones Methodology v2.0

Holy Stone HS200P Review | 97 Data compared

Avg. price:~£55Max flight time:14 minVideo resolution:1080pMax transmission distance:0.05 km

Holy Stone HS200P Review: Compare 97 technical specifications and expert reviews to see how this product ranks in the Drones category and whether it is worth buying.

4.8

Overall score

Score
4.8/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the drone's quality, based on technical analyses and grades from independent expert reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best drones on the market.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 95% of models
Score components

100%

4.8

Technical Score

No expert review graded yet
So the overall score is the technical score alone. With 3 full tests, experts would count 25%.
â–¼Worse than 95% of drones
4.8

Technical Score

Technical score
4.8/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of the drone's technical performance, covering key areas such as flight performance, camera quality, transmission, safety features, battery life, and design.
When it matters
When you want to compare drones based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 87% of models
Score components

26%

2.7

Flight

24%

5.4

Camera

20%

4.6

Safety

16%

5.8

Connectivity

14%

7.0

Battery & Design

â–¼Worse than 87% of drones
?

Review score

Review score
✕
What it is
Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
How we count it
Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves.
Weighting: Big test sites count more, first looks half as much as full tests. A video review counts half.
Share: The review score is 25% of the overall score with 3+ full tests, less with fewer.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Grades by review (0)
We have not found an independent test of this model yet, so its overall score is our technical score alone.
Shop star ratings are not part of this score.
No expert tests yet
  • holy-stone-hs200p
  • holy-stone-hs200p
  • holy-stone-hs200p
  • holy-stone-hs200p
  • holy-stone-hs200p
  • holy-stone-hs200p
  • holy-stone-hs200p
  • holy-stone-hs200p
holy-stone-hs200p
holy-stone-hs200p
holy-stone-hs200p
holy-stone-hs200p
holy-stone-hs200p
holy-stone-hs200p
holy-stone-hs200p
holy-stone-hs200p

Best prices

*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.

Best rankings

Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of drone Holy Stone HS200P

Technical Score
Technical score
4.8/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of the drone's technical performance, covering key areas such as flight performance, camera quality, transmission, safety features, battery life, and design.
When it matters
When you want to compare drones based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 87% of models
Score components:

26%

2.7

Flight

24%

5.4

Camera

20%

4.6

Safety

16%

5.8

Connectivity

14%

7.0

Battery & Design

4.8
Review score
Review score
✕
What it is
Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
How we count it
Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves.
Weighting: Big test sites count more, first looks half as much as full tests. A video review counts half.
Share: The review score is 25% of the overall score with 3+ full tests, less with fewer.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Grades by review (0)
We have not found an independent test of this model yet, so its overall score is our technical score alone.
Shop star ratings are not part of this score.
?
Popularity
Popularity
7.9/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the drone.
When it matters
When you prefer to choose a drone reviewed and selected by many other buyers.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 67% of models
Popularity:
Holy Stone HS200P has a popularity score of 7.9 points, which is higher than that of 66.8% of products in this category.
7.9
Ratio quality/price
Value for money
6.4/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the drone's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a drone with a good balance between flight quality, camera features, and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 88% of models
Score components:

60%

4.8

Overall score

40%

10

Price

6.4
Max flight time
14 min
Max flight time
14 min
â–¼ Worse than 73% of models
Market range: <8 min – >40 min
This drone has a max flight time of 14 min, shorter than 72.5% of drones and equal to 2% of drones.
Max flight distance
0.1 km
Max flight distance
0.1 km
â–¼ Worse than 75% of models
Market range: <0.05 km – >24 km
This drone has a max flight distance of 0.1 km, shorter-range than 75.1% of drones and equal to 8.8% of drones.
Max flight speed
4 m/s
Max flight speed
4 m/s
â–¼ Worse than 91% of models
Market range: <4 m/s – >21 m/s
This drone has a max flight speed of 4 m/s, slower than 90.5% of drones and equal to 6.3% of drones.
Max wind resistance
3.3 m/s
Max wind resistance
3.3 m/s
â–¼ Worse than 88% of models
Market range: <3.3 m/s – >12 m/s
This drone has max wind resistance of 3.3 m/s, lower than 88.5% of drones and equal to 7.2% of drones.
Max service ceiling (ASL)
?
Show more
Video resolution
1080p
Video resolution
1080p
â–¼ Worse than 72% of models
This drone records video at 1080p, lower than 71.8% of drones and equal to 11.9% of drones.
4K camera
no
4K camera
no
â–¼ Worse than 55% of models
This drone does not support 4K video. 54.6% of drones support 4K video.
Sensor size
?
Main camera megapixels
?
Max movie bitrate
?
Show more
Obstacle detection
no
Obstacle detection
no
â–¼ Worse than 31% of models
This drone does not support obstacle detection. 31% of drones support obstacle detection.
Return to Home (RTH)
no
Return to Home (RTH)
no
â–¼ Worse than 68% of models
This drone does not support Return-to-Home (RTH). 67.5% of drones support Return-to-Home (RTH).
GPS
no
GPS
no
â–¼ Worse than 65% of models
This drone does not support GPS. 65.2% of drones support GPS.
GNSS systems supported
none
GNSS systems supported
none
â–¼ Worse than 66% of models
This drone supports none GNSS systems, which are less comprehensive than those of 65.8% and the same as those of 34.2%.
Obstacle sensing directions
N/A
Show more
Max transmission distance
0.05 km
Max transmission distance
0.05 km
â–¼ Worse than 85% of models
Market range: <0.05 km – >15 km
This drone has a max transmission distance of 0.05 km, shorter-range than 85.2% of drones and equal to 9.2% of drones.
Transmission latency
?
Video transmission system
Wi-Fi
Video transmission system
Wi-Fi
â–¼ Worse than 44% of models
This drone uses Wi-Fi for video transmission, which is more advanced than the system used by 8.2% and the same as that used by 47.7%.
Live view quality
1080p@25 fps
Live view quality
1080p@25 fps
â–² Better than 50% of models
This drone offers live view quality of 1080p@25 fps, higher-quality than 50% of drones and equal to 10.4% of drones.
Remote control
yes
Remote control
yes
â–² Better than 5% of models
This drone has a handheld remote controller. 5% of drones offer this.
Show more
Battery capacity
900 mAh
Battery capacity
900 mAh
â–¼ Worse than 83% of models
Market range: <550 mAh – >5k mAh
This drone has a battery capacity of 900 mAh, smaller than 83.4% of drones.
Battery energy
?
Charging time
?
Weight
143 g
Weight
143 g
â–² Better than 76% of models
Market range: <80 g – >920 g
This drone weighs 143 g, lighter than 76.3% of drones.
Removable battery
yes
Removable battery
yes
â–² Better than 1% of models
This drone has a removable battery. 0.5% of drones have a removable battery.
Show more

Holy Stone HS200P vs the average drone

246810TotalFlightCameraSafetyConnectivityBattery & Design
  • Supports TapFly
    TapFly
    yes
    â–² Better than 62% of models
    This drone supports TapFly, while the average drone does not.
  • Includes propeller guards
    Propeller guards
    yes
    â–² Better than 67% of models
    This drone has propeller guards, while the average drone does not. 33.3% of drones offer them.
  • Supports smartphone control
    Smartphone control
    yes
    â–² Better than 50% of models
    This drone supports smartphone control, while the average drone does not.
  • 41.9% lower weight
    Weight
    143 g
    â–² Better than 76% of models
    Market range: <80 g – >920 g
    This drone is lighter than the average drone (143 g vs 246 g). The average drone weighs 246 g.
    143 g vs 246 g
  • 3 years newer release date
    Release date
    2026
    ★ Better than 92% of models
    Market range: <2k – >2k
    This drone is newer than the average drone (2026 vs 2023). The average drone was released in 2023.
    2026 vs 2023
  • 12.5 mm lower body height
    Height
    50 mm
    â–² Better than 77% of models
    Market range: <38 mm – >120 mm
    This drone is shorter than the average drone (50 mm vs 62.5 mm). The average drone is 62.5 mm tall.
    50 mm vs 62.5 mm
  • 3.64x cheaper
    Holy Stone HS200P is cheaper than the average drone (£55 vs £200).
    £55 vs £200
  • 3.64x cheaper
    Holy Stone HS200P is cheaper than the average drone (£55 vs £200).
    £55 vs £200
  • 3 years newer release date
    Release date
    2026
    ★ Better than 92% of models
    Market range: <2k – >2k
    This drone is newer than the average drone (2026 vs 2023). The average drone was released in 2023.
    2026 vs 2023
  • Supports TapFly
    TapFly
    yes
    â–² Better than 62% of models
    This drone supports TapFly, while the average drone does not.
  • Includes propeller guards
    Propeller guards
    yes
    â–² Better than 67% of models
    This drone has propeller guards, while the average drone does not. 33.3% of drones offer them.
  • Supports smartphone control
    Smartphone control
    yes
    â–² Better than 50% of models
    This drone supports smartphone control, while the average drone does not.
  • 41.9% lower weight
    Weight
    143 g
    â–² Better than 76% of models
    Market range: <80 g – >920 g
    This drone is lighter than the average drone (143 g vs 246 g). The average drone weighs 246 g.
    143 g vs 246 g
  • 12.5 mm lower body height
    Height
    50 mm
    â–² Better than 77% of models
    Market range: <38 mm – >120 mm
    This drone is shorter than the average drone (50 mm vs 62.5 mm). The average drone is 62.5 mm tall.
    50 mm vs 62.5 mm
  • Lower video resolution
    Video resolution
    1080p
    â–¼ Worse than 72% of models
    This drone offers lower video resolution than the average drone (1080p vs 4K/100 fps). The average drone offers a video resolution of 4K/100 fps.
    1080p vs 4K/100 fps
  • 7.4 m/s lower wind resistance
    Max wind resistance
    3.3 m/s
    â–¼ Worse than 88% of models
    Market range: <3.3 m/s – >12 m/s
    This drone handles weaker wind than the average drone (3.3 m/s vs 10.7 m/s). The average drone handles wind up to 10.7 m/s.
    3.3 m/s vs 10.7 m/s
  • Fewer GNSS systems
    GNSS systems supported
    none
    â–¼ Worse than 66% of models
    This drone supports none GNSS systems, while the average drone supports GPS, GLONASS, Galileo, BeiDou.
    none vs GPS, GLONASS, Galileo, BeiDou
  • 11 m/s slower flight speed
    Max flight speed
    4 m/s
    â–¼ Worse than 91% of models
    Market range: <4 m/s – >21 m/s
    This drone reaches a lower max flight speed than the average drone (4 m/s vs 15 m/s). The average drone reaches 15 m/s.
    4 m/s vs 15 m/s
  • More basic transmission system
    Video transmission system
    Wi-Fi
    â–¼ Worse than 44% of models
    This drone uses Wi-Fi for video transmission, while the average drone uses SkyLink 2.0.
    Wi-Fi vs SkyLink 2.0
  • No subject tracking
    Subject tracking
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 61% of models
    This drone cannot track subjects, while the average drone can.
  • No return-to-home (RTH)
    Return to Home (RTH)
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 68% of models
    This drone does not support return-to-home (RTH), while the average drone does.
  • No GPS
    GPS
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 65% of models
    This drone does not have GPS, while the average drone does.
  • 10% worse value for money
    Holy Stone HS200P has worse value for money than the average drone (6.39 vs 7).
    6.39 vs 7.03
  • 7.4 m/s lower wind resistance
    Max wind resistance
    3.3 m/s
    â–¼ Worse than 88% of models
    Market range: <3.3 m/s – >12 m/s
    This drone handles weaker wind than the average drone (3.3 m/s vs 10.7 m/s). The average drone handles wind up to 10.7 m/s.
    3.3 m/s vs 10.7 m/s
  • 11 m/s slower flight speed
    Max flight speed
    4 m/s
    â–¼ Worse than 91% of models
    Market range: <4 m/s – >21 m/s
    This drone reaches a lower max flight speed than the average drone (4 m/s vs 15 m/s). The average drone reaches 15 m/s.
    4 m/s vs 15 m/s
  • 6 min shorter flight time
    Max flight time
    14 min
    â–¼ Worse than 73% of models
    Market range: <8 min – >40 min
    This drone offers shorter max flight time than the average drone (14 min vs 20 min). The average drone offers 20 min of max flight time.
    14 min vs 20 min
  • 0.9 km shorter flight distance
    Max flight distance
    0.1 km
    â–¼ Worse than 75% of models
    Market range: <0.05 km – >24 km
    This drone has a shorter max flight distance than the average drone (0.1 km vs 1 km). The average drone can fly up to 1 km.
    0.1 km vs 1 km
  • Lower video resolution
    Video resolution
    1080p
    â–¼ Worse than 72% of models
    This drone offers lower video resolution than the average drone (1080p vs 4K/100 fps). The average drone offers a video resolution of 4K/100 fps.
    1080p vs 4K/100 fps
  • Fewer photo format options
    Photo formats supported
    JPEG
    â–¼ Worse than 41% of models
    This drone supports JPEG photo formats, while the average drone supports JPEG, DNG (RAW).
    JPEG vs JPEG, DNG (RAW)
  • Lower photo resolution
    Photo resolution
    1920 x 1080 px
    â–¼ Worse than 68% of models
    This drone offers lower photo resolution than the average drone (1920x1080 px vs 4096x3072 px). The average drone offers a photo resolution of 4096x3072 px.
    1920x1080 px vs 4096x3072 px
  • More basic stabilization
    Image stabilization type
    None (Fixed)
    â–¼ Worse than 64% of models
    This drone uses None (Fixed) image stabilization, while the average drone uses EIS (Digital).
    None (Fixed) vs EIS (Digital)
  • No memory card slot
    Memory card slot
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 74% of models
    This drone does not have a memory card slot, while the average drone does.
  • Narrower tilt range
    Camera tilt range
    -90 to 0 °
    â–¼ Worse than 33% of models
    This drone has a narrower tilt range than the average drone (-90 to 0 ° vs -90 to 20 °).
    -90 to 0 ° vs -90 to 20 °
  • No 4K video
    4K camera
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 55% of models
    This drone does not support 4K video, while the average drone does.
  • 128 GB lower memory card limit
    Max external memory supported
    0 GB
    â–¼ Worse than 76% of models
    Market range: <0 GB – >512 GB
    This drone supports less external storage than the average drone (0 GB vs 128 GB). The average drone supports up to 128 GB of external storage.
    0 GB vs 128 GB
  • Fewer GNSS systems
    GNSS systems supported
    none
    â–¼ Worse than 66% of models
    This drone supports none GNSS systems, while the average drone supports GPS, GLONASS, Galileo, BeiDou.
    none vs GPS, GLONASS, Galileo, BeiDou
  • No subject tracking
    Subject tracking
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 61% of models
    This drone cannot track subjects, while the average drone can.
  • No return-to-home (RTH)
    Return to Home (RTH)
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 68% of models
    This drone does not support return-to-home (RTH), while the average drone does.
  • No GPS
    GPS
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 65% of models
    This drone does not have GPS, while the average drone does.
  • No compass
    Compass
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 69% of models
    This drone does not have a compass, while the average drone does.
  • 2 fewer flight modes
    N. of intelligent flight modes
    2
    â–¼ Worse than 61% of models
    Market range: <0 – >8
    This drone offers fewer intelligent flight modes than the average drone (2 vs 4). The average drone offers 4 intelligent flight modes.
    2 vs 4
  • No beginner mode
    Beginner mode
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 56% of models
    This drone does not support beginner mode, while the average drone does.
  • 42.6% higher takeoff weight
    Max takeoff weight
    143 g
    â–¼ Worse than 81% of models
    Market range: <80 g – >1.1k g
    This drone has a higher max takeoff weight than the average drone (143 g vs 249 g). The average drone has a max takeoff weight of 249 g.
    143 g vs 249 g
  • More basic transmission system
    Video transmission system
    Wi-Fi
    â–¼ Worse than 44% of models
    This drone uses Wi-Fi for video transmission, while the average drone uses SkyLink 2.0.
    Wi-Fi vs SkyLink 2.0
  • Fewer frequency bands
    Operating frequency bands
    2.4 GHz
    â–¼ Worse than 70% of models
    This drone supports 2.4 GHz operating frequency bands, while the average drone supports 2.4 GHz, 5.8 GHz.
    2.4 GHz vs 2.4 GHz, 5.8 GHz
  • 0.95 km shorter transmission range
    Max transmission distance
    0.05 km
    â–¼ Worse than 85% of models
    Market range: <0.05 km – >15 km
    This drone has a shorter max transmission distance than the average drone (0.1 km vs 1 km). The average drone reaches 1 km of transmission distance.
    0.05 km vs 1 km
  • More basic controller
    Controller model
    HS200P Transmitter
    â–¼ Worse than 95% of models
    This drone uses the HS200P Transmitter controller, while the average drone uses LiteRadio 4 SE.
    HS200P Transmitter vs LiteRadio 4 SE
  • 1,300 mAh less battery capacity
    Battery capacity
    900 mAh
    â–¼ Worse than 83% of models
    Market range: <550 mAh – >5k mAh
    This drone has a smaller battery capacity than the average drone (900 mAh vs 2200 mAh). The average drone battery has a capacity of 2200 mAh.
    900 mAh vs 2,200 mAh

Third-party reviews

Read buyer reviews on Amazon →

What we like about Holy Stone HS200P

  • Brushless motors for steadier, longer-lasting flight
  • Around 14 minutes per flight from a 900 mAh battery
  • Foldable and only 143 g
  • Altitude hold and headless mode suit beginners
  • 1080p live view on a phone

What we don't like about Holy Stone HS200P

  • No GPS or automatic return
  • No video stabilisation
  • Short Wi-Fi range
  • Struggles in windy conditions

Verdict

The Holy Stone HS200P is a foldable camera drone for kids and beginners that sits between pocket toys and GPS models. At 143 g it is light enough to carry anywhere, yet its brushless motors give it noticeably steadier and longer-lasting flight than brushed toy drones. A 900 mAh battery delivers around 14 minutes per flight. The 1080p camera sends a live picture to a phone over Wi-Fi, good enough for fun clips from the garden but without stabilisation for smooth footage. Altitude hold keeps the height steady, headless mode simplifies steering, and the controls stay simple for younger pilots. Because there is no GPS, it will drift in wind and cannot fly home on its own. For a first outdoor drone on a small budget, it is a sensible and durable choice.

Compare Holy Stone HS200P with other drones

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Holy Stone HS200P and other drones

No results found