OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS
Scored using Drones Methodology v2.0
Drones Methodology v2.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontumo Drones Methodology v2.0: technical specifications plus grades from 1,023 independent expert reviews and 2,622 video reviews, with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Drones Methodology v2.0

Autel EVO II Dual 640T Review | 97 Data compared

Avg. price:~£4,000Max flight time:38 minVideo resolution:8K/25 fpsMax transmission distance:15 km

Autel EVO II Dual 640T Review: Compare 97 technical specifications and 1 expert and video reviews to see how this product ranks in the Drones category and whether it is worth buying.

8.5

Overall score

Score
8.5/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the drone's quality, based on technical analyses and grades from independent expert reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best drones on the market.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
★ Better than 93% of models
Score components

85%

8.7

Technical score

15%

7.1

Review score ( 0 · 1)

Review score 15% · 7.1 · based on 1 video
1 video counts as 0.5 of the 4 needed; the rest counts as 7/10. Every model in this category gets the same split: reviews 15%, technical score 85%. A video or a short review counts less than a full test.
★Better than 93% of drones
8.7

Technical score

Technical score
8.7/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of the drone's technical performance, covering key areas such as flight performance, camera quality, transmission, safety features, battery life, and design.
When it matters
When you want to compare drones based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
★ Better than 96% of models
Score components

26%

9.8

Flight

24%

8.7

Camera

20%

8.8

Safety

16%

8.6

Connectivity

14%

7.1

Battery & Design

★Better than 96% of drones
7.1

Review score

Review score
7.1/ 10
✕
What it is
Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
How we count it
Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves.
Weighting: Big test sites count more, short reviews half as much as full tests. A video review counts half.
Share: Reviews are 15% of the overall score for every model in this category; each of the 4 needed reviews that is missing counts as 7/10.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▼ Worse than 87% of models
Grades by review (1)
1 video review, counting half as much as a written test. Share in the overall score: 15%, the same for every model in this category.
Video reviews 1

12.5%

8.0

HYPE Militaria

estimated from the review
Shop star ratings are not part of this score.
▼Worse than 87% of drones
  • No image
No image

Best prices

    N/A~ £4,000

Best rankings

Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of drone Autel EVO II Dual 640T

Technical score
Technical score
8.7/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of the drone's technical performance, covering key areas such as flight performance, camera quality, transmission, safety features, battery life, and design.
When it matters
When you want to compare drones based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
★ Better than 96% of models
Score components:

26%

9.8

Flight

24%

8.7

Camera

20%

8.8

Safety

16%

8.6

Connectivity

14%

7.1

Battery & Design

8.7
Review score
Review score
7.1/ 10
✕
What it is
Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
How we count it
Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves.
Weighting: Big test sites count more, short reviews half as much as full tests. A video review counts half.
Share: Reviews are 15% of the overall score for every model in this category; each of the 4 needed reviews that is missing counts as 7/10.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▼ Worse than 87% of models
Grades by review (1)
1 video review, counting half as much as a written test. Share in the overall score: 15%, the same for every model in this category.
Video reviews 1

12.5%

8.0

HYPE Militaria

estimated from the review
Shop star ratings are not part of this score.
7.1
Popularity
Popularity
1.0/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the drone.
When it matters
When you prefer to choose a drone reviewed and selected by many other buyers.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▼ Worse than 99% of models
Popularity:
Autel EVO II Dual 640T has a popularity score of 1 point, which is lower than that of 74.3% of products in this category.
1.0
Value for money
Value for money
6.3/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the drone's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a drone with a good balance between flight quality, camera features, and price.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▼ Worse than 96% of models
Score components:

60%

8.5

Overall score

40%

1.0

Price

6.3
Max flight time
38 min
Max flight time
38 min
▲ Better than 85% of models
Market range: <8 min – >40 min
This drone has a max flight time of 38 min, longer than 85% of drones and equal to 2.5% of drones.
Max flight distance
25 km
Max flight distance
25 km
★ Better than 91% of models
Market range: <0.05 km – >24 km
This drone has a max flight distance of 25 km, farther than 90.6% of drones and equal to 3.3% of drones.
Distance can vary by region standard (for example FCC vs CE).
Max flight speed
20 m/s
Max flight speed
20 m/s
▲ Better than 82% of models
Market range: <4 m/s – >21 m/s
This drone has a max flight speed of 20 m/s, faster than 81.7% of drones and equal to 6.3% of drones.
Max wind resistance
12 m/s
Max wind resistance
12 m/s
▲ Better than 76% of models
Market range: <3.3 m/s – >12 m/s
This drone has max wind resistance of 12 m/s, higher than 75.5% of drones and equal to 15.1% of drones.
Max service ceiling (ASL)
7,000 m
Max service ceiling (ASL)
7,000 m
★ Better than 95% of models
Market range: <120 m – >6k m
This drone has a max service ceiling of 7,000 m, higher than 94.8% of drones and equal to 5.2% of drones.
Show more
Video resolution
8K/25 fps
Video resolution
8K/25 fps
★ Better than 97% of models
This drone records video at 8K/25 fps, higher than 97% of drones and equal to 2% of drones.
Thermal-camera stream resolutions were not prioritized over main visual recording mode.
4K camera
yes
4K camera
yes
▲ Better than 46% of models
This drone supports 4K video. 46% of drones support 4K video.
Sensor size
1/1.28"
Sensor size
1/1.28"
▲ Better than 79% of models
This drone has a sensor size of 1/1.28", larger than 78.7% of drones and equal to 3.7% of drones.
Main camera megapixels
48 MP
Main camera megapixels
48 MP
▲ Better than 76% of models
Market range: <2 MP – >48 MP
This drone has a main camera resolution of 48 MP, higher than 76% of drones and equal to 18% of drones.
Max movie bitrate
120 Mbps
Max movie bitrate
120 Mbps
▲ Better than 61% of models
Market range: <40 Mbps – >180 Mbps
This drone has a max movie bitrate of 120 Mbps, higher than 60.5% of drones and equal to 11.8% of drones.
Show more
Obstacle detection
yes
Obstacle detection
yes
▲ Better than 70% of models
This drone supports obstacle detection. 69.5% of drones support obstacle detection.
Return to Home (RTH)
yes
Return to Home (RTH)
yes
▲ Better than 33% of models
This drone supports Return-to-Home (RTH). 33% of drones support Return-to-Home (RTH).
GPS
yes
GPS
yes
▲ Better than 35% of models
This drone supports GPS. 35.3% of drones support GPS.
GNSS systems supported
GPS, GLONASS, Galileo, BeiDou
GNSS systems supported
GPS, GLONASS, Galileo, BeiDou
▲ Better than 82% of models
This drone supports GPS, GLONASS, Galileo, BeiDou GNSS systems, which are more comprehensive than those of 82.4% and the same as those of 17.6%.
Obstacle sensing directions
omnidirectional
Obstacle sensing directions
omnidirectional
▲ Better than 83% of models
This drone senses obstacles in omnidirectional directions, which is more comprehensive than that of 83.4% and the same as that of 16.6%.
Show more
Max transmission distance
15 km
Max transmission distance
15 km
▲ Better than 89% of models
Market range: <0.05 km – >15 km
This drone has a max transmission distance of 15 km, farther than 89.3% of drones and equal to 5.6% of drones.
Maximum range varies by region; CE/SRRC/MIC limits can be lower.
Transmission latency
?
Video transmission system
SkyLink 2.0
Video transmission system
SkyLink 2.0
▲ Better than 77% of models
This drone uses SkyLink 2.0 for video transmission, which is more advanced than the system used by 77.4% and the same as that used by 2.6%.
Live view quality
1080p@30 fps
Live view quality
1080p@30 fps
▲ Better than 61% of models
This drone offers live view quality of 1080p@30 fps, higher-quality than 60.9% of drones and equal to 18.8% of drones.
Remote control
yes
Remote control
yes
▲ Better than 5% of models
This drone has a handheld remote controller. 5% of drones offer this.
Show more
Battery capacity
7,100 mAh
Battery capacity
7,100 mAh
★ Better than 97% of models
Market range: <550 mAh – >5k mAh
This drone has a battery capacity of 7,100 mAh, larger than 96.9% of drones and equal to 2.6% of drones.
Battery energy
82 Wh
Battery energy
82 Wh
★ Better than 92% of models
Market range: <3.7 Wh – >77 Wh
This drone has battery energy of 82 Wh, higher than 92.4% of drones and equal to 2.9% of drones.
Charging time
90 min
Charging time
90 min
▲ Better than 44% of models
Market range: <55 min – >180 min
This drone charges in 90 min, faster than 43.8% of drones and equal to 18.8% of drones.
Weight
1,209 g
Weight
1,209 g
▼ Worse than 94% of models
Market range: <80 g – >920 g
This drone weighs 1,209 g, heavier than 93.8% of drones.
Removable battery
yes
Removable battery
yes
▲ Better than 1% of models
This drone has a removable battery. 0.5% of drones have a removable battery.
Show more

Autel EVO II Dual 640T vs the average drone

246810TotalFlightCameraSafetyConnectivityBattery & Design
  • 24 km longer flight distance
    Max flight distance
    25 km
    ★ Better than 91% of models
    Market range: <0.05 km – >24 km
    This drone has a longer max flight distance than the average drone (25 km vs 1 km). The average drone can fly up to 1 km.
    Distance can vary by region standard (for example FCC vs CE).
    25 km vs 1 km
  • 18 min longer flight time
    Max flight time
    38 min
    ▲ Better than 85% of models
    Market range: <8 min – >40 min
    This drone offers longer max flight time than the average drone (38 min vs 20 min). The average drone offers 20 min of max flight time.
    38 min vs 20 min
  • 14 km longer transmission range
    Max transmission distance
    15 km
    ▲ Better than 89% of models
    Market range: <0.05 km – >15 km
    This drone has a longer max transmission distance than the average drone (15 km vs 1 km). The average drone reaches 1 km of transmission distance.
    Maximum range varies by region; CE/SRRC/MIC limits can be lower.
    15 km vs 1 km
  • Supports obstacle detection
    Obstacle detection
    yes
    ▲ Better than 70% of models
    This drone supports obstacle detection, while the average drone does not.
  • 4,900 mAh more battery capacity
    Battery capacity
    7,100 mAh
    ★ Better than 97% of models
    Market range: <550 mAh – >5k mAh
    This drone has a larger battery capacity than the average drone (7100 mAh vs 2200 mAh). The average drone battery has a capacity of 2200 mAh.
    7,100 mAh vs 2,200 mAh
  • Larger sensor size
    Sensor size
    1/1.28"
    ▲ Better than 79% of models
    This drone has a larger sensor than the average drone (1/1.28" vs 1/2.3"). The average drone uses a sensor of 1/2.3".
    1/1.28" vs 1/2.3"
  • 64.82 Wh more battery energy
    Battery energy
    82 Wh
    ★ Better than 92% of models
    Market range: <3.7 Wh – >77 Wh
    This drone has higher battery energy than the average drone (82 Wh vs 17.18 Wh). The average drone battery has 17.18 Wh of energy.
    82 Wh vs 17.18 Wh
  • 3 more gimbal axes
    Gimbal axes
    3
    ▲ Better than 64% of models
    Market range: <0 – >3
    This drone has more gimbal axes than the average drone (3 vs 0). The average drone has 0 gimbal axes.
    3 vs 0
  • 24 km longer flight distance
    Max flight distance
    25 km
    ★ Better than 91% of models
    Market range: <0.05 km – >24 km
    This drone has a longer max flight distance than the average drone (25 km vs 1 km). The average drone can fly up to 1 km.
    Distance can vary by region standard (for example FCC vs CE).
    25 km vs 1 km
  • 18 min longer flight time
    Max flight time
    38 min
    ▲ Better than 85% of models
    Market range: <8 min – >40 min
    This drone offers longer max flight time than the average drone (38 min vs 20 min). The average drone offers 20 min of max flight time.
    38 min vs 20 min
  • 5 m/s faster flight speed
    Max flight speed
    20 m/s
    ▲ Better than 82% of models
    Market range: <4 m/s – >21 m/s
    This drone reaches a higher max flight speed than the average drone (20 m/s vs 15 m/s). The average drone reaches 15 m/s.
    20 m/s vs 15 m/s
  • 1.3 m/s higher wind resistance
    Max wind resistance
    12 m/s
    ▲ Better than 76% of models
    Market range: <3.3 m/s – >12 m/s
    This drone handles stronger wind than the average drone (12 m/s vs 10.7 m/s). The average drone handles wind up to 10.7 m/s.
    12 m/s vs 10.7 m/s
  • 3 m/s faster ascent speed
    Max ascent speed
    8 m/s
    ▲ Better than 73% of models
    Market range: <3 m/s – >8 m/s
    This drone climbs faster than the average drone (8 m/s vs 5 m/s). The average drone climbs at 5 m/s.
    8 m/s vs 5 m/s
  • 3,500 m higher service ceiling
    Max service ceiling (ASL)
    7,000 m
    ★ Better than 95% of models
    Market range: <120 m – >6k m
    This drone can fly at a higher max service ceiling than the average drone (7000 m vs 3500 m). The average drone reaches 3500 m.
    7,000 m vs 3,500 m
  • Larger sensor size
    Sensor size
    1/1.28"
    ▲ Better than 79% of models
    This drone has a larger sensor than the average drone (1/1.28" vs 1/2.3"). The average drone uses a sensor of 1/2.3".
    1/1.28" vs 1/2.3"
  • 3 more gimbal axes
    Gimbal axes
    3
    ▲ Better than 64% of models
    Market range: <0 – >3
    This drone has more gimbal axes than the average drone (3 vs 0). The average drone has 0 gimbal axes.
    3 vs 0
  • Supports low-light mode
    Low light mode
    yes
    ▲ Better than 78% of models
    This drone supports low-light mode, while the average drone does not.
  • Includes thermal camera
    Thermal camera
    yes
    ★ Better than 98% of models
    This drone has a thermal camera, while the average drone does not. 2.5% of drones offer one.
  • More video codec options
    Video codecs supported
    H.264/AVC, H.265/HEVC
    ▲ Better than 70% of models
    This drone supports H.264/AVC, H.265/HEVC video codecs, while the average drone supports H.264/AVC.
    H.264/AVC, H.265/HEVC vs H.264/AVC
  • Captures RAW photos
    RAW photo capture
    yes
    ▲ Better than 67% of models
    This drone can capture RAW photos, while the average drone cannot.
  • More capable focus system
    Focus system
    hybrid AF (PDAF + CDAF)
    ★ Better than 94% of models
    This drone uses hybrid AF (PDAF + CDAF) for focusing, while the average drone uses fixed focus.
    hybrid AF (PDAF + CDAF) vs fixed focus
  • More advanced stabilization
    Image stabilization type
    3-Axis Mechanical
    ▲ Better than 62% of models
    This drone uses 3-Axis Mechanical image stabilization, while the average drone uses EIS (Digital).
    3-Axis Mechanical vs EIS (Digital)
  • Richer manual controls
    Manual camera controls
    full
    ▲ Better than 68% of models
    This drone offers full manual camera controls, while the average drone offers no.
    full vs no
  • More video format options
    Video formats
    MP4, MOV
    ▲ Better than 83% of models
    This drone supports MP4, MOV video formats, while the average drone supports MP4.
    MP4, MOV vs MP4
  • Supports slow-motion mode
    Slow-motion mode
    yes
    ▲ Better than 71% of models
    This drone supports slow-motion mode, while the average drone does not.
  • 36 MP more camera resolution
    Main camera megapixels
    48 MP
    ▲ Better than 76% of models
    Market range: <2 MP – >48 MP
    This drone has more main camera megapixels than the average drone (48 MP vs 12 MP). The average drone has 12 MP on the main camera.
    48 MP vs 12 MP
  • 8 GB more internal storage
    Internal storage
    8 GB
    ▲ Better than 84% of models
    Market range: <0 GB – >8 GB
    This drone has more internal storage than the average drone (8 GB vs 0 GB). The average drone has 0 GB of internal storage.
    8 GB vs 0 GB
  • More color profile options
    Color profiles
    Normal, A-Log
    ▲ Better than 77% of models
    This drone supports Normal, A-Log color profiles, while the average drone supports Normal.
    Normal, A-Log vs Normal
  • 20 Mbps higher video bitrate
    Max movie bitrate
    120 Mbps
    ▲ Better than 61% of models
    Market range: <40 Mbps – >180 Mbps
    This drone supports a higher maximum video bitrate than the average drone (120 Mbps vs 100 Mbps). The average drone supports a maximum video bitrate of 100 Mbps.
    120 Mbps vs 100 Mbps
  • 13 x higher digital zoom
    Digital zoom
    16 x
    ▲ Better than 87% of models
    Market range: <0 x – >16 x
    This drone offers more digital zoom than the average drone (16 x vs 3 x). The average drone offers 3 x of digital zoom.
    16 x vs 3 x
  • Higher video resolution
    Video resolution
    8K/25 fps
    ★ Better than 97% of models
    This drone offers higher video resolution than the average drone (8K/25 fps vs 4K/100 fps). The average drone offers a video resolution of 4K/100 fps.
    Thermal-camera stream resolutions were not prioritized over main visual recording mode.
    8K/25 fps vs 4K/100 fps
  • Supports HDR mode
    HDR mode
    yes
    ▲ Better than 72% of models
    This drone supports HDR mode, while the average drone does not.
  • More photo format options
    Photo formats supported
    JPEG, DNG (RAW), TIFF, IRG
    ★ Better than 100% of models
    This drone supports JPEG, DNG (RAW), TIFF, IRG photo formats, while the average drone supports JPEG, DNG (RAW).
    JPEG, DNG (RAW), TIFF, IRG vs JPEG, DNG (RAW)
  • Higher photo resolution
    Photo resolution
    8192 x 6144 px
    ★ Better than 92% of models
    This drone offers higher photo resolution than the average drone (8192x6144 px vs 4096x3072 px). The average drone offers a photo resolution of 4096x3072 px.
    8192x6144 px vs 4096x3072 px
  • Wider aperture
    Aperture
    f/1.9
    ▲ Better than 76% of models
    This drone has a wider aperture than the average drone (f/1.9 vs f/2). The average drone uses an aperture of f/2.
    f/1.9 vs f/2
  • Supports burst mode
    Burst mode
    yes
    ▲ Better than 61% of models
    This drone supports burst mode, while the average drone does not.
  • Supports panorama mode
    Panorama mode
    yes
    ▲ Better than 54% of models
    This drone supports panorama mode, while the average drone does not.
  • Supports obstacle detection
    Obstacle detection
    yes
    ▲ Better than 70% of models
    This drone supports obstacle detection, while the average drone does not.
  • Supports waypoint flight
    Waypoint flight
    yes
    ▲ Better than 51% of models
    This drone supports waypoint flight, while the average drone does not.
  • Weather-sealed design
    Weather sealing (splashproof)
    yes
    ★ Better than 94% of models
    This drone is weather-sealed, while the average drone is not.
    IP43
  • 8.03x lower takeoff weight
    Max takeoff weight
    1999 g
    ★ Better than 96% of models
    Market range: <80 g – >1.1k g
    This drone has a lower max takeoff weight than the average drone (1999 g vs 249 g). The average drone has a max takeoff weight of 249 g.
    1,999 g vs 249 g
  • Less restrictive EU class
    EU class marking
    C2
    ▲ Better than 68% of models
    This drone is rated as C2 under the EU drone class system, while the average drone is rated as None.
    C2 vs None
  • 14 km longer transmission range
    Max transmission distance
    15 km
    ▲ Better than 89% of models
    Market range: <0.05 km – >15 km
    This drone has a longer max transmission distance than the average drone (15 km vs 1 km). The average drone reaches 1 km of transmission distance.
    Maximum range varies by region; CE/SRRC/MIC limits can be lower.
    15 km vs 1 km
  • Built-in display
    Display
    yes
    ▲ Better than 85% of models
    This drone has a built-in display, while the average drone does not.
  • More frequency bands
    Operating frequency bands
    2.4 GHz, 5.2 GHz, 5.8 GHz
    ▲ Better than 84% of models
    This drone supports 2.4 GHz, 5.2 GHz, 5.8 GHz operating frequency bands, while the average drone supports 2.4 GHz, 5.8 GHz.
    2.4 GHz, 5.2 GHz, 5.8 GHz vs 2.4 GHz, 5.8 GHz
  • More polished companion app
    Companion app
    Autel Explorer
    ▲ Better than 76% of models
    This drone uses the Autel Explorer companion app, while the average drone uses HS FPV.
    Autel Explorer vs HS FPV
  • Better live view quality
    Live view quality
    1080p@30 fps
    ▲ Better than 61% of models
    This drone has better live view quality than the average drone (1080p@30 fps vs 1080p@25 fps). The average drone offers live view quality of 1080p@25 fps.
    1080p@30 fps vs 1080p@25 fps
  • 4,900 mAh more battery capacity
    Battery capacity
    7,100 mAh
    ★ Better than 97% of models
    Market range: <550 mAh – >5k mAh
    This drone has a larger battery capacity than the average drone (7100 mAh vs 2200 mAh). The average drone battery has a capacity of 2200 mAh.
    7,100 mAh vs 2,200 mAh
  • 64.82 Wh more battery energy
    Battery energy
    82 Wh
    ★ Better than 92% of models
    Market range: <3.7 Wh – >77 Wh
    This drone has higher battery energy than the average drone (82 Wh vs 17.18 Wh). The average drone battery has 17.18 Wh of energy.
    82 Wh vs 17.18 Wh
  • More modern charging port
    Charging interface
    proprietary
    ▼ Worse than 42% of models
    This drone uses proprietary for charging, while the average drone uses micro-USB.
    proprietary vs micro-USB
  • 4.91x higher weight
    Weight
    1,209 g
    ▼ Worse than 94% of models
    Market range: <80 g – >920 g
    This drone is heavier than the average drone (1209 g vs 246 g). The average drone weighs 246 g.
    1,209 g vs 246 g
  • 317 mm wider width
    Width
    558 mm
    ▼ Worse than 98% of models
    Market range: <114 mm – >387.5 mm
    This drone is wider than the average drone (558 mm vs 241 mm). The average drone width is 241 mm.
    558 mm vs 241 mm
  • 45.5 mm taller body height
    Height
    108 mm
    ▼ Worse than 85% of models
    Market range: <38 mm – >120 mm
    This drone is taller than the average drone (108 mm vs 62.5 mm). The average drone is 62.5 mm tall.
    108 mm vs 62.5 mm
  • 182 mm longer body length
    Length
    457 mm
    ▼ Worse than 96% of models
    Market range: <117 mm – >385 mm
    This drone is longer than the average drone (457 mm vs 275 mm). The average drone is 275 mm long.
    457 mm vs 275 mm
  • 20x more expensive
    Autel EVO II Dual 640T is more expensive than the average drone (£4,000 vs £200).
    £4,000 vs £200
  • 12.5% worse value for money
    Autel EVO II Dual 640T has worse value for money than the average drone (6.28 vs 7.1).
    6.28 vs 7.06
  • 6.47x less popular
    Autel EVO II Dual 640T is less popular than the average drone (1 vs 6.5).
    1 vs 6.47
  • No headless mode
    Headless mode
    no
    ▼ Worse than 55% of models
    This drone does not support headless mode, while the average drone does.
  • 20x more expensive
    Autel EVO II Dual 640T is more expensive than the average drone (£4,000 vs £200).
    £4,000 vs £200
  • 12.5% worse value for money
    Autel EVO II Dual 640T has worse value for money than the average drone (6.28 vs 7.1).
    6.28 vs 7.06
  • 6.47x less popular
    Autel EVO II Dual 640T is less popular than the average drone (1 vs 6.5).
    1 vs 6.47
  • 2 years older release date
    Release date
    2021
    ▼ Worse than 59% of models
    Market range: <2k – >2k
    This drone is older than the average drone (2021 vs 2023). The average drone was released in 2023.
    April 2021
    2021 vs 2023
  • No headless mode
    Headless mode
    no
    ▼ Worse than 55% of models
    This drone does not support headless mode, while the average drone does.
  • More basic controller
    Controller model
    Smart Controller V3
    ▼ Worse than 63% of models
    This drone uses the Smart Controller V3 controller, while the average drone uses LiteRadio 4 SE.
    Smart Controller V3 vs LiteRadio 4 SE
  • 4.91x higher weight
    Weight
    1,209 g
    ▼ Worse than 94% of models
    Market range: <80 g – >920 g
    This drone is heavier than the average drone (1209 g vs 246 g). The average drone weighs 246 g.
    1,209 g vs 246 g
  • 317 mm wider width
    Width
    558 mm
    ▼ Worse than 98% of models
    Market range: <114 mm – >387.5 mm
    This drone is wider than the average drone (558 mm vs 241 mm). The average drone width is 241 mm.
    558 mm vs 241 mm
  • 45.5 mm taller body height
    Height
    108 mm
    ▼ Worse than 85% of models
    Market range: <38 mm – >120 mm
    This drone is taller than the average drone (108 mm vs 62.5 mm). The average drone is 62.5 mm tall.
    108 mm vs 62.5 mm
  • 182 mm longer body length
    Length
    457 mm
    ▼ Worse than 96% of models
    Market range: <117 mm – >385 mm
    This drone is longer than the average drone (457 mm vs 275 mm). The average drone is 275 mm long.
    457 mm vs 275 mm
  • Plainer color finish
    Color
    gray, orange
    ▼ Worse than 72% of models
    This drone comes in gray, orange, while the average drone comes in gray.
    gray, orange vs gray

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

8.0
HYPE Militaria
≈ estimated
31/08/2025
Hands-on review · flight, range, battery and camera tests
Verdict
Autel EVO II Dual 640T offers an impressive thermal camera and radio range, but poor battery life in wind and mixed obstacle avoidance hold it back.
Shop video
Shop video
Brand video
Overview video
Overview video
Brand video

Third-party reviews

What we like about Autel EVO II Dual 640T

  • High-resolution (640x512) thermal sensor with excellent sensitivity for industrial and public safety use
  • Lack of geofencing allows operators to fly without manufacturer-imposed restrictions or unlocking procedures
  • Dual-camera system enables simultaneous 8K visual and high-quality thermal data capture
  • Impressive flight time of up to 38-40 minutes per battery
  • Stable flight performance even in high-wind conditions up to 39 mph
  • Rugged design and included hard case provide superior protection for fieldwork
  • Interchangeable modular camera system allows for versatile payload options

What we don't like about Autel EVO II Dual 640T

  • Autel Explorer app is often described as less intuitive and user-friendly compared to DJI counterparts
  • Obstacle avoidance system can be overly sensitive, sometimes slowing the drone unnecessarily in open air
  • Customer service has been reported as hit-or-miss with slow response times
  • Software updates and initial firmware setup can be slow and cumbersome
  • Historical issues with horizon tilt, although often fixable through meticulous calibration
  • Concern over long-term parts availability, particularly batteries, as models age

Verdict

The Autel EVO II Dual 640T is a high-performance professional drone featuring a dual-sensor camera system that integrates a 640x512 thermal imaging sensor and a 50MP visual camera capable of 8K video. Key characteristics include an 11-mile (15km) transmission range via SkyLink 2.0, a 38-minute maximum flight time, and 360-degree omnidirectional obstacle avoidance powered by 19 groups of sensors. Its main pros are the high thermal sensitivity (<50mk), 16x digital zoom (including 4x lossless), and its lack of mandatory geofencing, allowing for rapid deployment in critical search and rescue or industrial inspection missions. However, notable cons include its relatively heavy takeoff weight of approximately 1209g and its lack of official waterproofing, making it unsuitable for flight in moderate to heavy rain.

Compare Autel EVO II Dual 640T with other drones

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Autel EVO II Dual 640T and other drones

No results found