Scored using Cameras Methodology v1.0
Cameras Methodology v1.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are evaluated mathematically under Frontumo Cameras Methodology v1.0 using verified laboratory benchmarks, technical specifications, and authentic consumer ratings with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Cameras Methodology v1.0

Sony RX100 Mark II Review | 108 Data compared

Avg. price:~£290Sensor size:1-inchWeight:281 gBattery life (CIPA):350 shots

Sony RX100 Mark II Review: Compare 108 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Cameras category and whether it is worth buying.

5.3

Overall score

Score
5.3/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the camera's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best cameras on the market.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

90%

5.3

Technical score

10%

?

User score

â–²Better than 56% of cameras
5.3

Technical score

Technical score
5.3/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Cameras category across these key areas: Sensor & Image, Photo Features, Video & Audio, Display & Design, Battery & Power, Connectivity & Storage.
When it matters
When you want to compare cameras based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

28%

5.6

Sensor & Image

25%

4.5

Photo Features

18%

5.2

Video & Audio

14%

6.6

Display & Design

8%

5.4

Battery & Power

7%

5.0

Connectivity & Storage

â–²Better than 60% of cameras
?

User score

User score
8.0/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the camera.
When it matters
When real-world owner satisfaction and review volume matter to your decision.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

?

User ratings

30%

?

Number of reviews

Loading...
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of camera Sony RX100 Mark II

Technical score
Technical score
5.3/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Cameras category across these key areas: Sensor & Image, Photo Features, Video & Audio, Display & Design, Battery & Power, Connectivity & Storage.
When it matters
When you want to compare cameras based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

28%

5.6

Sensor & Image

25%

4.5

Photo Features

18%

5.2

Video & Audio

14%

6.6

Display & Design

8%

5.4

Battery & Power

7%

5.0

Connectivity & Storage

5.3
User score
User score
8.0/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the camera.
When it matters
When real-world owner satisfaction and review volume matter to your decision.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

?

User ratings

30%

?

Number of reviews

?
Popularity
Popularity
1.0/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the camera.
When it matters
When you want to see which cameras attract the most buyer attention and review activity.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Popularity:
Sony RX100 Mark II has a popularity score of 1, which is lower than 51.3% of cameras.
1.0
Value for money
Value for money
6.4/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the camera's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you want to know how much overall quality you get for the price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

60%

5.3

Overall score

40%

9.0

Price

6.4
Sensor size
1-inch
Sensor size
1-inch
This camera uses a sensor classified as 1-inch; it is smaller than the sensor in 51.1% of cameras and the same size as the sensor in 5.2% of cameras.
Main camera megapixels
20.2 MP
Main camera megapixels
20.2 MP
This camera has a sensor resolution of 20.2 MP, which is higher than that of 66.2% of cameras and equal to that of 1.9% of cameras.
Main camera pixel size
2.41 µm
Main camera pixel size
2.41 µm
This camera has sensor pixels measuring 2.41 µm, which are smaller than those in 52.4% of cameras and the same size as those in 3.6% of cameras.
Base ISO
160
Base ISO
160
This camera has a base ISO of 160 which is higher than that of 80.6% of cameras and equal to that of 4% of cameras.
Max ISO
ISO 12800 ISO
Max ISO
ISO 12,800
This camera reaches a maximum sensitivity of ISO 12,800, which is higher than that of 54.4% of cameras and equal to that of 18.8% of cameras.
Show more
Lens mount
N/A
Built-in focus motor
no
Built-in focus motor
no
This camera does not have a built-in focus motor. 11% of cameras have a built-in focus motor.
N. of focus points
25
N. of focus points
25
This camera has 25 focus points, more than the number offered by 50.4% of cameras and equal to the number offered by 4.6% of cameras.
Phase-detection autofocus (photos)
no
Phase-detection autofocus (photos)
no
This camera does not support phase-detection autofocus for photos. 37.5% of cameras support phase-detection autofocus for photos.
AF tracking
yes
AF tracking
yes
This camera supports AF tracking. This feature is available on 88% of cameras.
Show more
Max video resolution
1920 px
Max video resolution
1920 px
This camera supports 1920 px video recording which is higher quality than that of 28.7% of cameras and equal to that of 47.1% of cameras.
Video bitrate
28 Mbps
Video bitrate
28 Mbps
This camera has a video bitrate of 28 Mbps which is lower than that of 51.9% of cameras and equal to that of 8.7% of cameras.
Video bit depth
8 bit
Video bit depth
8 bit
This camera supports video at 8 bit, a bit depth higher than that of 7.8% of cameras and equal to that of 80.6% of cameras.
Video chroma subsampling
4:2:0
Video chroma subsampling
4:2:0
This camera supports 4:2:0 video chroma subsampling which is more advanced than that of 7.8% of cameras and equal to that of 69.9% of cameras.
Video codecs
H.264
Show more
Type
compact
Weight
281 g
Weight
281 g
This camera weighs 281 g which is lighter than 64.3% of cameras and equal to the weight of 0.2% of cameras.
Width
102 mm
Width
102 mm
This camera has a width of 102 mm which is narrower than 79.6% of cameras and equal to that of 0.8% of cameras.
Height
58.1 mm
Height
58.1 mm
This camera has a height of 58.1 mm which is shorter than 85.8% of cameras and equal to that of 1.3% of cameras.
Thickness
38.3 mm
Thickness
38.3 mm
This camera has a thickness of 38.3 mm which is thinner than 62% of cameras and equal to that of 0.3% of cameras.
Show more
Battery life (CIPA)
350 shots
Battery life (CIPA)
350 shots
This camera has a CIPA-rated battery life of 350 shots, which is longer than that of 54.5% of cameras and equal to that of 5% of cameras.
Battery capacity
1,240 mAh
Battery capacity
1,240 mAh
This camera has a battery capacity of 1,240 mAh which is larger than the batteries in 57.3% of cameras and equal to those in 3% of cameras.
Removable battery
yes
Removable battery
yes
This camera has a removable battery, and 98.7% of cameras include one.
USB Power Delivery (PD)
no
USB Power Delivery (PD)
no
This camera does not support USB Power Delivery. 10.1% of cameras support USB Power Delivery.
Wi-Fi connectivity
yes
Wi-Fi connectivity
yes
This camera supports Wi-Fi. This feature is available on 47.8% of cameras.
Wi-Fi version
Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n)
Wi-Fi version
Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n)
This camera uses Wi-Fi version Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n) which is newer than that of 54.2% of cameras and equal to that of 35.6% of cameras.
Bluetooth connectivity
no
Bluetooth connectivity
no
This camera does not have Bluetooth. 22.7% of cameras support Bluetooth.
Bluetooth version
N/A
USB Type-C
no
USB Type-C
no
This camera does not include USB Type-C. 14.6% of cameras use USB-C.
Show more

Sony RX100 Mark II vs the average camera

246810TotalDisplay & DesignSensor & ImagePhoto FeaturesVideo & AudioBattery & PowerConnectivity & Storage
  • Uses a BSI sensor
    BSI sensor
    yes
    This camera uses a BSI sensor, the average camera does not. 34.8% of cameras use a BSI sensor.
    Back-illuminated CMOS sensor.
  • Has microphone input
    Microphone input
    yes
    This camera has microphone input, the average camera does not.
    proprietary microphone interface
  • 4.3 fps faster mechanical burst
    Continuous shooting (mechanical)
    10 fps
    This camera has a faster mechanical burst than the average camera (10 fps vs 5.7 fps). The average camera reaches 5.7 fps.
    10 fps vs 5.7 fps
  • Supports Wi-Fi connectivity
    Wi-Fi connectivity
    yes
    This camera supports Wi-Fi, the average camera does not. 47.8% of cameras support Wi-Fi.
  • Supports live streaming
    Live streaming (first-party)
    yes
    This camera supports live streaming, the average camera does not.
    Imaging Edge Webcam.
  • Smartphone remote control
    Smartphone remote control
    yes
    This camera supports smartphone remote control, the average camera does not. 46.2% of cameras support smartphone remote control.
    via Imaging Edge Mobile
  • Supports 24p cinema mode
    24p cinema mode
    yes
    This camera supports 24p cinema mode, the average camera does not. 44% of cameras support this mode.
    NTSC mode required
  • Higher sensor resolution
    Main camera megapixels
    20.2 MP
    This camera has a higher sensor resolution than the average camera (20.2 MP vs 16.2 MP). The average camera has a sensor resolution of 16.2 MP.
    20.2 MP vs 16.2 MP
  • 114 g lighter
    Weight
    281 g
    This camera is lighter than the average camera (281 g vs 395 g). The average camera weighs 395 g.
    281 g vs 395 g
  • 15.8 mm shorter body
    Height
    58.1 mm
    This camera is shorter than the average camera (58.1 mm vs 73.9 mm). The average camera has a height of 73.9 mm.
    58.1 mm vs 73.9 mm
  • 17.9 mm narrower
    Width
    102 mm
    This camera is narrower than the average camera (102 mm vs 119.9 mm). The average camera has a width of 119.9 mm.
    102 mm vs 119.9 mm
  • Uses a BSI sensor
    BSI sensor
    yes
    This camera uses a BSI sensor, the average camera does not. 34.8% of cameras use a BSI sensor.
    Back-illuminated CMOS sensor.
  • Higher sensor resolution
    Main camera megapixels
    20.2 MP
    This camera has a higher sensor resolution than the average camera (20.2 MP vs 16.2 MP). The average camera has a sensor resolution of 16.2 MP.
    20.2 MP vs 16.2 MP
  • 6,400 ISO higher maximum sensitivity limit
    Max ISO
    12,800 ISO
    This camera has a higher maximum sensitivity than the average camera (12800 ISO vs 6400 ISO). The average camera reaches a maximum sensitivity of 6400 ISO.
    12,800 ISO vs 6,400 ISO
  • 60 higher base ISO
    Base ISO
    160
    This camera has a higher base ISO than the average camera (160 vs 100). The average camera has a base ISO of 100.
    160 vs 100
  • 4.3 fps faster mechanical burst
    Continuous shooting (mechanical)
    10 fps
    This camera has a faster mechanical burst than the average camera (10 fps vs 5.7 fps). The average camera reaches 5.7 fps.
    10 fps vs 5.7 fps
  • In-camera panorama mode
    In-camera panorama mode
    yes
    This camera includes an in-camera panorama mode, the average camera does not.
  • Has microphone input
    Microphone input
    yes
    This camera has microphone input, the average camera does not.
    proprietary microphone interface
  • Supports live streaming
    Live streaming (first-party)
    yes
    This camera supports live streaming, the average camera does not.
    Imaging Edge Webcam.
  • Supports 24p cinema mode
    24p cinema mode
    yes
    This camera supports 24p cinema mode, the average camera does not. 44% of cameras support this mode.
    NTSC mode required
  • Supports Wi-Fi connectivity
    Wi-Fi connectivity
    yes
    This camera supports Wi-Fi, the average camera does not. 47.8% of cameras support Wi-Fi.
  • Smartphone remote control
    Smartphone remote control
    yes
    This camera supports smartphone remote control, the average camera does not. 46.2% of cameras support smartphone remote control.
    via Imaging Edge Mobile
  • Has NFC
    NFC
    yes
    This camera supports NFC, the average camera does not. 15% of cameras support NFC.
  • More versatile card slots
    Memory card slot types
    Memory Stick Duo + SD
    This camera uses more versatile card slots than the average camera (Memory Stick Duo + SD vs SD). The average camera supports SD memory card slot types.
    Memory Stick Duo + SD vs SD
  • Worse low-light autofocus
    AF low-light sensitivity
    0
    This camera has a worse low-light AF sensitivity than the average camera (0 EV vs -4 EV). The average camera reaches a low-light AF sensitivity of -4 EV.
    0 vs -4
  • Smaller sensor
    Sensor size
    1-inch
    This camera has a smaller sensor than the average camera (1-inch vs APS-C).
    1-inch vs APS-C
  • Lower RAW bit depth
    RAW bit depth
    12-bit
    This camera supports lower RAW bit depth than the average camera (12-bit vs 14-bit). The average camera supports 14-bit RAW capture.
    12-bit vs 14-bit
  • 360 points lower DxOMark Sports score
    DxOMark sports score
    483 points
    This camera has a lower DxOMark sports score than the average camera (483 points vs 843 points). The average camera has a DxOMark sports score of 843 points.
    483 points vs 843 points
  • 0.93 µm smaller sensor pixels
    Main camera pixel size
    2.41 µm
    This camera has smaller sensor pixels than the average camera (2.4 µm vs 3.34 µm). The average sensor pixel size is 3.34 µm.
    2.41 µm vs 3.34 µm
  • 6 points lower DxOMark sensor score
    DxOMark sensor score
    67 points
    This camera has a lower DxOMark sensor score than the average camera (67 points vs 73 points). The average camera has a DxOMark sensor score of 73 points.
    67 points vs 73 points
  • 0.5 points lower DxOMark Portrait score
    DxOMark portrait score
    22.5 points
    This camera has a lower DxOMark portrait score than the average camera (22.5 points vs 23 points). The average camera scores 23.0 points.
    22.5 points vs 23.0 points
  • 93% less popular
    Sony RX100 Mark II is less popular than the average camera (1 vs 1.9).
    1 vs 1.93
  • 93% less popular
    Sony RX100 Mark II is less popular than the average camera (1 vs 1.9).
    1 vs 1.93
  • Smaller sensor
    Sensor size
    1-inch
    This camera has a smaller sensor than the average camera (1-inch vs APS-C).
    1-inch vs APS-C
  • Lower RAW bit depth
    RAW bit depth
    12-bit
    This camera supports lower RAW bit depth than the average camera (12-bit vs 14-bit). The average camera supports 14-bit RAW capture.
    12-bit vs 14-bit
  • 360 points lower DxOMark Sports score
    DxOMark sports score
    483 points
    This camera has a lower DxOMark sports score than the average camera (483 points vs 843 points). The average camera has a DxOMark sports score of 843 points.
    483 points vs 843 points
  • 0.93 µm smaller sensor pixels
    Main camera pixel size
    2.41 µm
    This camera has smaller sensor pixels than the average camera (2.4 µm vs 3.34 µm). The average sensor pixel size is 3.34 µm.
    2.41 µm vs 3.34 µm
  • 6 points lower DxOMark sensor score
    DxOMark sensor score
    67 points
    This camera has a lower DxOMark sensor score than the average camera (67 points vs 73 points). The average camera has a DxOMark sensor score of 73 points.
    67 points vs 73 points
  • 0.5 points lower DxOMark Portrait score
    DxOMark portrait score
    22.5 points
    This camera has a lower DxOMark portrait score than the average camera (22.5 points vs 23 points). The average camera scores 23.0 points.
    22.5 points vs 23.0 points
  • Worse low-light autofocus
    AF low-light sensitivity
    0
    This camera has a worse low-light AF sensitivity than the average camera (0 EV vs -4 EV). The average camera reaches a low-light AF sensitivity of -4 EV.
    0 vs -4
  • 2 Mbps lower video bitrate
    Video bitrate
    28 Mbps
    This camera has a lower video bitrate than the average camera (28 Mbps vs 30 Mbps). The average camera records at 30 Mbps.
    28 Mbps vs 30 Mbps

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

D
dpreview.com
23/09/2013
Summary of the review
I
imaging-resource.com
27/06/2013
Summary of the review
P
pcmag.com
07/08/2013
Summary of the review
E
ephotozine.com
10/07/2013
Summary of the review
T
trustedreviews.com
15/07/2013
Summary of the review
T
techradar.com
12/07/2018
Summary of the review
A
amateurphotographer.com
01/07/2013
Summary of the review
W
whatdigitalcamera.com
12/07/2013
Summary of the review
E
eoshd.com
25/07/2013
Summary of the review
T
t3.com
28/06/2013
Summary of the review
E
expertreviews.co.uk
20/06/2016
Summary of the review
W
whatdigitalcamera.com
12/07/2013
Summary of the review
C
chip.de
26/07/2013
Summary of the review
D
digitalkamera.de
20/08/2013
Summary of the review
D
dkamera.de
17/05/2022
Summary of the review
G
gwegner.de
09/07/2013
Summary of the review
C
computerbild.de
17/03/2014
Summary of the review
N
netzwelt.de
22/10/2026
Summary of the review
F
freiheitenwelt.de
19/01/2014
Summary of the review
C
chip.de
27/06/2013
Summary of the review
L
lesnumeriques.com
27/06/2013
Summary of the review
C
clubic.com
12/07/2013
Summary of the review
L
leclaireur.fnac.com
13/07/2013
Summary of the review
C
cnetfrance.fr
19/11/2013
Summary of the review
P
photoetmac.com
29/06/2013
Summary of the review
C
camerarace.com
27/06/2013
Summary of the review
D
dg77.net
03/11/2025
Summary of the review
L
lesnumeriques.com
02/07/2013
Summary of the review
D
dxomark.fr
27/06/2013
Summary of the review
X
xatakafoto.com
17/07/2013
Summary of the review
T
teknofilo.com
27/12/2013
Summary of the review
X
xataka.com
17/07/2013
Summary of the review
M
macitynet.it
22/11/2013
Summary of the review
S
saggiamente.com
16/12/2013
Summary of the review
F
fotocamerapro.it
11/05/2015
Summary of the review
D
digifotopro.nl
27/06/2013
Summary of the review

Third-party reviews

What we like about Sony RX100 Mark II

  • Excellent image quality with its large 1-inch Exmor R sensor
  • Pocket-friendly, compact, and lightweight aluminum body
  • Bright f/1.8 Carl Zeiss lens at the wide end for low light
  • New tilting 3-inch LCD screen useful for different angles
  • Multi-Interface shoe for adding an external flash or EVF
  • Fast autofocus and overall speedy performance
  • Built-in Wi-Fi and NFC for easy photo sharing

What we don't like about Sony RX100 Mark II

  • Slippery body design that lacks a built-in grip
  • Aperture drops significantly (to f/4.9) when fully zoomed
  • LCD screen tilts but cannot flip 180 degrees for selfies
  • Slow and 'clickless' front control ring can be unengaging
  • No built-in ND filter or internal Raw conversion
  • High launch price and expensive hot shoe accessories
  • Tendency to clip bright highlights in high-contrast scenes

Verdict

The Sony RX100 Mark II is a premium pocket-sized compact camera featuring a 20.2MP 1-inch Exmor R back-illuminated CMOS sensor and a 28-100mm equivalent f/1.8-4.9 Carl Zeiss Vario-Sonnar T* lens. Its main characteristics include a 3-inch 1.2M-dot tilting LCD screen, a multi-interface hot shoe for accessories like an electronic viewfinder or external flash, and built-in Wi-Fi with NFC for easy sharing. Key pros are its class-leading image quality for its size, improved low-light performance over its predecessor, and fast autofocus speeds. Notable cons include the lack of a built-in electronic viewfinder, a somewhat slick and grip-less body design, and a lens aperture that narrows significantly to f/4.9 at the telephoto end.

Compare Sony RX100 Mark II with other products in the Cameras category

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Sony RX100 Mark II and other products in the Cameras category

No results found