OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS
Scored using Cameras Methodology v1.0
Cameras Methodology v1.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are evaluated mathematically under Frontumo Cameras Methodology v1.0 using verified laboratory benchmarks, technical specifications, and authentic consumer ratings with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Cameras Methodology v1.0

Samsung WB110 Review | 108 Data compared

Avg. price:~£200Sensor size:1/2.3"Weight:385 gBattery life (CIPA):200 shots

Samsung WB110 Review: Compare 108 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Cameras category and whether it is worth buying.

4.2

Overall score

Score
4.2/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the camera's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best cameras on the market.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 88% of models
Score components

90%

3.9

Technical score

10%

6.7

User score

â–¼Worse than 88% of cameras
3.9

Technical score

Technical score
3.9/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Cameras category across these key areas: Sensor & Image, Photo Features, Video & Audio, Display & Design, Battery & Power, Connectivity & Storage.
When it matters
When you want to compare cameras based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 88% of models
Score components

28%

4.4

Sensor & Image

25%

3.7

Photo Features

18%

3.2

Video & Audio

14%

5.1

Display & Design

8%

3.2

Battery & Power

7%

2.8

Connectivity & Storage

â–¼Worse than 88% of cameras
6.7

User score

User score
6.7/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the camera.
When it matters
When real-world owner satisfaction and review volume matter to your decision.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 96% of models
Score components

70%

8.0

User ratings

30%

3.6

Number of reviews

Based on 6 buyer reviews from online shops.
Read buyer reviews on Amazon →
How we calculate this
User ratings – average star rating across all shop listings, weighted by how many reviews each has, on a 1–10 scale.
Number of reviews – how many buyer reviews the product has, on a logarithmic scale; the 8% most-reviewed models in the category get 10.
â–¼Worse than 96% of cameras
  • No image
No image

Best prices

    N/A~ £200

Best rankings

Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of camera Samsung WB110

Technical score
Technical score
3.9/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Cameras category across these key areas: Sensor & Image, Photo Features, Video & Audio, Display & Design, Battery & Power, Connectivity & Storage.
When it matters
When you want to compare cameras based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 88% of models
Score components:

28%

4.4

Sensor & Image

25%

3.7

Photo Features

18%

3.2

Video & Audio

14%

5.1

Display & Design

8%

3.2

Battery & Power

7%

2.8

Connectivity & Storage

3.9
User score
User score
6.7/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the camera.
When it matters
When real-world owner satisfaction and review volume matter to your decision.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 96% of models
Score components

70%

8.0

User ratings

30%

3.6

Number of reviews

Based on 6 buyer reviews from online shops.
Read buyer reviews on Amazon →
How we calculate this
User ratings – average star rating across all shop listings, weighted by how many reviews each has, on a 1–10 scale.
Number of reviews – how many buyer reviews the product has, on a logarithmic scale; the 8% most-reviewed models in the category get 10.
6.7
Popularity
Popularity
3.6/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the camera.
When it matters
When you want to see which cameras attract the most buyer attention and review activity.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 54% of models
Popularity:
Samsung WB110 has a popularity score of 3.6, which is higher than 53.6% of cameras.
3.6
Value for money
Value for money
5.8/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the camera's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you want to know how much overall quality you get for the price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 79% of models
Score components:

60%

4.2

Overall score

40%

9.5

Price

5.8
Sensor size
1/2.3"
Sensor size
1/2.3"
â–¼ Worse than 61% of models
This camera uses a sensor classified as 1/2.3"; it is smaller than the sensor in 60.5% of cameras and the same size as the sensor in 38.1% of cameras.
Main camera megapixels
20.2 MP
Main camera megapixels
20.2 MP
â–² Better than 66% of models
This camera has a sensor resolution of 20.2 MP, which is higher than that of 66.2% of cameras and equal to that of 1.9% of cameras.
Main camera pixel size
1.19 µm
Main camera pixel size
1.19 µm
â–¼ Worse than 95% of models
Market range: <1.33 µm – >5.94 µm
This camera has sensor pixels measuring 1.19 µm, which are smaller than those in 95.3% of cameras and the same size as those in 2.3% of cameras.
Base ISO
80
Base ISO
80
â–¼ Worse than 80% of models
Market range: <80 – >200
This camera has a base ISO of 80 which is lower than that of 80.3% of cameras and equal to that of 15.4% of cameras.
Max ISO
ISO 3200 ISO
Max ISO
ISO 3,200
â–¼ Worse than 63% of models
This camera reaches a maximum sensitivity of ISO 3,200, which is lower than that of 62.9% of cameras and equal to that of 22.7% of cameras.
Show more
Lens mount
N/A
Built-in focus motor
no
Built-in focus motor
no
â–¼ Worse than 11% of models
This camera does not have a built-in focus motor. 11% of cameras have a built-in focus motor.
N. of focus points
9
N. of focus points
9
â–¼ Worse than 67% of models
Market range: <9 – >399
This camera has 9 focus points, fewer than the number offered by 67.1% of cameras and equal to the number offered by 26% of cameras.
Phase-detection autofocus (photos)
no
Phase-detection autofocus (photos)
no
â–¼ Worse than 37% of models
This camera does not support phase-detection autofocus for photos. 37.5% of cameras support phase-detection autofocus for photos.
AF tracking
yes
AF tracking
yes
â–² Better than 12% of models
This camera supports AF tracking. This feature is available on 88% of cameras.
Show more
Max video resolution
1,280 px
Max video resolution
1,280 px
â–¼ Worse than 71% of models
This camera supports 1,280 px video recording which is lower quality than that of 71.4% of cameras and equal to that of 18.5% of cameras.
Video bitrate
8 Mbps
Video bitrate
8 Mbps
â–¼ Worse than 98% of models
Market range: <12 Mbps – >237 Mbps
This camera has a video bitrate of 8 Mbps which is lower than that of 97.6% of cameras and equal to that of 0.6% of cameras.
Video bit depth
8 bit
Video bit depth
8 bit
â–¼ Worse than 12% of models
This camera supports video at 8 bit, a bit depth higher than that of 7.8% of cameras and equal to that of 80.6% of cameras.
Video chroma subsampling
4:2:0
Video chroma subsampling
4:2:0
â–¼ Worse than 22% of models
This camera supports 4:2:0 video chroma subsampling which is more advanced than that of 7.8% of cameras and equal to that of 69.9% of cameras.
Video codecs
H.264
Show more
Type
bridge
Weight
385 g
Weight
385 g
â–² Better than 51% of models
Market range: <142 g – >812 g
This camera weighs 385 g which is lighter than 51.5% of cameras and equal to the weight of 0.1% of cameras.
Body only.
Width
114.5 mm
Width
114.5 mm
â–² Better than 58% of models
Market range: <96 mm – >142.6 mm
This camera has a width of 114.5 mm which is narrower than 57.8% of cameras.
Height
79.3 mm
Height
79.3 mm
â–¼ Worse than 54% of models
Market range: <57.6 mm – >105.8 mm
This camera has a height of 79.3 mm which is taller than 54.3% of cameras.
Thickness
86.5 mm
Thickness
86.5 mm
â–¼ Worse than 85% of models
Market range: <21.9 mm – >92 mm
This camera has a thickness of 86.5 mm which is thicker than 85.4% of cameras.
Show more
Battery life (CIPA)
200 shots
Battery life (CIPA)
200 shots
â–¼ Worse than 91% of models
Market range: <210 shots – >700 shots
This camera has a CIPA-rated battery life of 200 shots, which is shorter than that of 90.5% of cameras and equal to that of 3.8% of cameras.
Battery capacity
N/A
Removable battery
yes
Removable battery
yes
â–² Better than 1% of models
This camera has a removable battery, and 98.7% of cameras include one.
Uses 4x AA batteries.
USB Power Delivery (PD)
no
USB Power Delivery (PD)
no
â–¼ Worse than 10% of models
This camera does not support USB Power Delivery. 10.1% of cameras support USB Power Delivery.
Wi-Fi connectivity
no
Wi-Fi connectivity
no
â–¼ Worse than 48% of models
This camera does not support Wi-Fi. 47.9% of cameras include this feature.
Wi-Fi version
N/A
Bluetooth connectivity
no
Bluetooth connectivity
no
â–¼ Worse than 23% of models
This camera does not have Bluetooth. 22.7% of cameras support Bluetooth.
Bluetooth version
N/A
USB Type-C
no
USB Type-C
no
â–¼ Worse than 15% of models
This camera does not include USB Type-C. 14.6% of cameras use USB-C.
Show more

Samsung WB110 vs the average camera

246810TotalDisplay & DesignSensor & ImagePhoto FeaturesVideo & AudioBattery & PowerConnectivity & Storage
  • Built-in timelapse
    Timelapse function
    yes
    â–² Better than 56% of models
    This camera includes timelapse capture, the average camera does not.
  • Higher sensor resolution
    Main camera megapixels
    20.2 MP
    â–² Better than 66% of models
    This camera has a higher sensor resolution than the average camera (20.2 MP vs 16.2 MP). The average camera has a sensor resolution of 16.2 MP.
    20.2 MP vs 16.2 MP
  • 0.05 GB more storage
    Internal storage
    0.053 GB
    â–² Better than 83% of models
    Market range: <0 GB – >0.07 GB
    This camera has a higher internal storage than the average camera (0.1 GB vs 0 GB). The average camera offers 0 GB of internal storage.
    0.053 GB vs 0 GB
  • In-camera panorama mode
    In-camera panorama mode
    yes
    â–² Better than 56% of models
    This camera includes an in-camera panorama mode, the average camera does not.
  • 3.66x more optical zoom
    Optical zoom
    26 x
    â–² Better than 83% of models
    Market range: <1 x – >35 x
    40% more optical zoom: this camera offers 26 x, compared with 7.1 x on the average camera.
    The built-in lens provides 26x optical zoom.
    26 x vs 7.1 x
  • Higher sensor resolution
    Main camera megapixels
    20.2 MP
    â–² Better than 66% of models
    This camera has a higher sensor resolution than the average camera (20.2 MP vs 16.2 MP). The average camera has a sensor resolution of 16.2 MP.
    20.2 MP vs 16.2 MP
  • In-camera panorama mode
    In-camera panorama mode
    yes
    â–² Better than 56% of models
    This camera includes an in-camera panorama mode, the average camera does not.
  • 3.66x more optical zoom
    Optical zoom
    26 x
    â–² Better than 83% of models
    Market range: <1 x – >35 x
    40% more optical zoom: this camera offers 26 x, compared with 7.1 x on the average camera.
    The built-in lens provides 26x optical zoom.
    26 x vs 7.1 x
  • Built-in timelapse
    Timelapse function
    yes
    â–² Better than 56% of models
    This camera includes timelapse capture, the average camera does not.
  • 0.05 GB more storage
    Internal storage
    0.053 GB
    â–² Better than 83% of models
    Market range: <0 GB – >0.07 GB
    This camera has a higher internal storage than the average camera (0.1 GB vs 0 GB). The average camera offers 0 GB of internal storage.
    0.053 GB vs 0 GB
  • Smaller sensor
    Sensor size
    1/2.3"
    â–¼ Worse than 61% of models
    This camera has a smaller sensor than the average camera (1/2.3" vs APS-C).
    1/2.3" vs APS-C
  • 2.15 µm smaller sensor pixels
    Main camera pixel size
    1.19 µm
    â–¼ Worse than 95% of models
    Market range: <1.33 µm – >5.94 µm
    This camera has smaller sensor pixels than the average camera (1.2 µm vs 3.34 µm). The average sensor pixel size is 3.34 µm.
    1.19 µm vs 3.34 µm
  • Lacks HDR mode
    HDR mode
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 55% of models
    This camera does not support HDR mode, the average camera does. 55.1% of cameras include HDR mode.
  • Lower video resolution
    Max video resolution
    1,280 px
    â–¼ Worse than 71% of models
    This camera records lower-resolution video than the average camera (1280 px vs 1920 px). The average camera records at 1920 px.
    1280 px vs 1920 px
  • No continuous video AF
    Continuous autofocus (video)
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 71% of models
    This camera does not support continuous autofocus in video, the average camera does.
    single-shot AF only
  • No hot shoe
    Hot shoe
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 54% of models
    This camera does not have a hot shoe, the average camera does.
  • 130 shots fewer shots per charge
    Battery life (CIPA)
    200 shots
    â–¼ Worse than 91% of models
    Market range: <210 shots – >700 shots
    This camera has shorter battery life than the average camera (200 shots vs 330 shots). The average camera delivers 330 shots per charge.
    200 shots vs 330 shots
  • 1 fewer microphones
    N. of microphones
    1
    â–¼ Worse than 63% of models
    Market range: <1 – >2
    This camera has fewer microphones than the average camera (1 vs 2). The average camera has 2 microphones.
    1 vs 2
  • 19.7% lower user score
    User score
    6.7/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the camera.
    When it matters
    When real-world owner satisfaction and review volume matter to your decision.
    Score distribution
    â–¼
    â–¼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    Samsung WB110
    the average camera
    Samsung WB110 has a lower user score than the average camera (6.68 vs 8.000).
    6.68 vs 8
  • 7.3% worse value for money
    Samsung WB110 has a worse value-for-money score than the average camera (5.77 vs 6.2).
    5.77 vs 6.2
  • No hot shoe
    Hot shoe
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 54% of models
    This camera does not have a hot shoe, the average camera does.
  • 40.5 mm thicker
    Thickness
    86.5 mm
    â–¼ Worse than 85% of models
    Market range: <21.9 mm – >92 mm
    This camera is thicker than the average camera (86.5 mm vs 46 mm). The average camera has a thickness of 46 mm.
    86.5 mm vs 46 mm
  • Smaller sensor
    Sensor size
    1/2.3"
    â–¼ Worse than 61% of models
    This camera has a smaller sensor than the average camera (1/2.3" vs APS-C).
    1/2.3" vs APS-C
  • 2.15 µm smaller sensor pixels
    Main camera pixel size
    1.19 µm
    â–¼ Worse than 95% of models
    Market range: <1.33 µm – >5.94 µm
    This camera has smaller sensor pixels than the average camera (1.2 µm vs 3.34 µm). The average sensor pixel size is 3.34 µm.
    1.19 µm vs 3.34 µm
  • Lacks HDR mode
    HDR mode
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 55% of models
    This camera does not support HDR mode, the average camera does. 55.1% of cameras include HDR mode.
  • 3,200 ISO lower maximum sensitivity limit
    Max ISO
    3,200 ISO
    â–¼ Worse than 63% of models
    Market range: <1.6k ISO – >40k ISO
    This camera has a lower maximum sensitivity than the average camera (3200 ISO vs 6400 ISO). The average camera reaches a maximum sensitivity of 6400 ISO.
    3,200 ISO vs 6,400 ISO
  • No RAW photo capture
    RAW photo capture
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 63% of models
    This camera does not support RAW photo capture, the average camera does. 62.8% of cameras support RAW formats.
  • 14 fewer AF points
    N. of focus points
    9
    â–¼ Worse than 67% of models
    Market range: <9 – >399
    This camera has fewer focus points than the average camera (9 vs 23). The average camera offers 23 focus points.
    9 vs 23
  • No manual focus mode
    Manual focus
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 72% of models
    This camera does not support manual focus, the average camera does. 71.7% of cameras include a manual focus mode.
  • No manual exposure control
    Manual exposure
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 72% of models
    This camera does not support manual exposure, the average camera does. 72% of cameras support manual exposure controls.
  • 0.7 fps slower mechanical burst
    Continuous shooting (mechanical)
    5 fps
    â–¼ Worse than 52% of models
    Market range: <1.08 fps – >10 fps
    This camera has a slower mechanical burst than the average camera (5 fps vs 5.7 fps). The average camera reaches 5.7 fps.
    5 fps vs 5.7 fps
  • 22 s shorter maximum exposure
    Longest shutter speed
    8 s
    â–¼ Worse than 79% of models
    Market range: <4 s – >1.8k s
    This camera supports a shorter maximum exposure than the average camera (8 s s vs 30 s s). The average camera supports a longest shutter speed of 30 s s.
    8 s vs 30 s
  • Lower video resolution
    Max video resolution
    1,280 px
    â–¼ Worse than 71% of models
    This camera records lower-resolution video than the average camera (1280 px vs 1920 px). The average camera records at 1920 px.
    1280 px vs 1920 px
  • No continuous video AF
    Continuous autofocus (video)
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 71% of models
    This camera does not support continuous autofocus in video, the average camera does.
    single-shot AF only
  • 1 fewer microphones
    N. of microphones
    1
    â–¼ Worse than 63% of models
    Market range: <1 – >2
    This camera has fewer microphones than the average camera (1 vs 2). The average camera has 2 microphones.
    1 vs 2
  • 22 Mbps lower video bitrate
    Video bitrate
    8 Mbps
    â–¼ Worse than 98% of models
    Market range: <12 Mbps – >237 Mbps
    This camera has a lower video bitrate than the average camera (8 Mbps vs 30 Mbps). The average camera records at 30 Mbps.
    8 Mbps vs 30 Mbps
  • 10 min shorter recording time
    Max video recording time
    20 min
    â–¼ Worse than 90% of models
    Market range: <25 min – >60 min
    This camera records continuously for less time than the average camera (20 min vs 30 min). The average camera records for 30 min.
    20 min vs 30 min
  • 130 shots fewer shots per charge
    Battery life (CIPA)
    200 shots
    â–¼ Worse than 91% of models
    Market range: <210 shots – >700 shots
    This camera has shorter battery life than the average camera (200 shots vs 330 shots). The average camera delivers 330 shots per charge.
    200 shots vs 330 shots

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

Third-party reviews

Based on 6 buyer reviews from online shops.
Reviews last updated: July 2026 · How we calculate this
Read buyer reviews on Amazon →

What we like about Samsung WB110

  • Powerful 26x optical zoom for distant subjects
  • Effective macro mode for detailed close-ups
  • Vibrant and appealing color reproduction
  • Intuitive 'Smart Auto' mode is helpful for beginners
  • Lightweight and ergonomic body that is comfortable to hold
  • Ultra wide-angle lens (22.3mm) captures more in each frame

What we don't like about Samsung WB110

  • Poor performance in low-light conditions, leading to grain
  • Non-intuitive menu interface for some users
  • Plastic housing feels somewhat fragile/low-quality
  • Unreliable and slow autofocus, especially when zoomed in
  • Video resolution capped at 720p HD rather than full 1080p
  • Uses AA batteries, which some users find less convenient than rechargeable packs

Verdict

The Samsung WB110 is a bridge-style point-and-shoot camera featuring a 20.2-megapixel 1/2.3" CCD sensor and a versatile 26x optical zoom lens with a 22.3mm ultra-wide-angle focal range (equivalent to 22.3-579.8mm). Key characteristics include a 3.0-inch hVGA LCD that automatically adjusts brightness, Dual Image Stabilization (OIS and DIS) for clearer handheld shots, and 720p HD video recording at 30fps. Its main pros are the high resolution for a budget camera, an impressive zoom reach, and the convenience of using four standard AA batteries for power. However, notable cons include its limited maximum video resolution (720p), lack of manual control modes (relying heavily on Smart Auto), and relatively poor performance in low-light conditions typical of small CCD sensors.

Compare Samsung WB110 with other products in the Cameras category

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Samsung WB110 and other products in the Cameras category

No results found