OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS
Scored using Cameras Methodology v1.0
Cameras Methodology v1.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are evaluated mathematically under Frontumo Cameras Methodology v1.0 using verified laboratory benchmarks, technical specifications, and authentic consumer ratings with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Cameras Methodology v1.0

Panasonic LUMIX DMC FH25 Review | 108 Data compared

Avg. price:~£130Sensor size:1/2.3"Weight:159 gBattery life (CIPA):250 shots

Panasonic LUMIX DMC FH25 Review: Compare 108 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Cameras category and whether it is worth buying.

3.8

Overall score

Score
3.8/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the camera's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best cameras on the market.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 96% of models
Score components

90%

3.8

Technical score

10%

?

User score

â–¼Worse than 96% of cameras
3.8

Technical score

Technical score
3.8/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Cameras category across these key areas: Sensor & Image, Photo Features, Video & Audio, Display & Design, Battery & Power, Connectivity & Storage.
When it matters
When you want to compare cameras based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 91% of models
Score components

28%

4.4

Sensor & Image

25%

3.4

Photo Features

18%

3.6

Video & Audio

14%

4.4

Display & Design

8%

3.1

Battery & Power

7%

2.7

Connectivity & Storage

â–¼Worse than 91% of cameras
?

User score

User score
8.0/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the camera.
When it matters
When real-world owner satisfaction and review volume matter to your decision.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 78% of models
Score components

70%

?

User ratings

30%

?

Number of reviews

  • No image
No image

Best prices

    N/A~ £130

Best rankings

Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of camera Panasonic LUMIX DMC FH25

Technical score
Technical score
3.8/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Cameras category across these key areas: Sensor & Image, Photo Features, Video & Audio, Display & Design, Battery & Power, Connectivity & Storage.
When it matters
When you want to compare cameras based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 91% of models
Score components:

28%

4.4

Sensor & Image

25%

3.4

Photo Features

18%

3.6

Video & Audio

14%

4.4

Display & Design

8%

3.1

Battery & Power

7%

2.7

Connectivity & Storage

3.8
User score
User score
8.0/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the camera.
When it matters
When real-world owner satisfaction and review volume matter to your decision.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 78% of models
Score components

70%

?

User ratings

30%

?

Number of reviews

?
Popularity
Popularity
1.0/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the camera.
When it matters
When you want to see which cameras attract the most buyer attention and review activity.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 99% of models
Popularity:
Panasonic LUMIX DMC FH25 has a popularity score of 1, which is lower than 51.3% of cameras.
1.0
Value for money
Value for money
5.6/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the camera's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you want to know how much overall quality you get for the price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 87% of models
Score components:

60%

3.8

Overall score

40%

9.8

Price

5.6
Sensor size
1/2.3"
Sensor size
1/2.3"
â–¼ Worse than 61% of models
This camera uses a sensor classified as 1/2.3"; it is smaller than the sensor in 60.5% of cameras and the same size as the sensor in 38.1% of cameras.
Main camera megapixels
16.1 MP
Main camera megapixels
16.1 MP
â–¼ Worse than 53% of models
This camera has a sensor resolution of 16.1 MP, which is lower than that of 53.3% of cameras and equal to that of 7.9% of cameras.
Main camera pixel size
1.33 µm
Main camera pixel size
1.33 µm
â–¼ Worse than 88% of models
Market range: <1.33 µm – >5.94 µm
This camera has sensor pixels measuring 1.33 µm, which are smaller than those in 88.2% of cameras and the same size as those in 3.6% of cameras.
Base ISO
100
Base ISO
100
â–¼ Worse than 28% of models
Market range: <80 – >200
This camera has a base ISO of 100 which is higher than that of 19.9% of cameras and equal to that of 52.4% of cameras.
Max ISO
ISO 6400 ISO
Max ISO
ISO 6,400
â–¼ Worse than 47% of models
This camera reaches a maximum sensitivity of ISO 6,400, which is higher than that of 37.3% of cameras and equal to that of 16.2% of cameras.
Show more
Lens mount
N/A
Built-in focus motor
no
Built-in focus motor
no
â–¼ Worse than 11% of models
This camera does not have a built-in focus motor. 11% of cameras have a built-in focus motor.
N. of focus points
11
N. of focus points
11
â–¼ Worse than 60% of models
Market range: <9 – >399
This camera has 11 focus points, fewer than the number offered by 60.4% of cameras and equal to the number offered by 6.5% of cameras.
Phase-detection autofocus (photos)
no
Phase-detection autofocus (photos)
no
â–¼ Worse than 37% of models
This camera does not support phase-detection autofocus for photos. 37.5% of cameras support phase-detection autofocus for photos.
AF tracking
yes
AF tracking
yes
â–² Better than 12% of models
This camera supports AF tracking. This feature is available on 88% of cameras.
Show more
Max video resolution
1,280 px
Max video resolution
1,280 px
â–¼ Worse than 71% of models
This camera supports 1,280 px video recording which is lower quality than that of 71.4% of cameras and equal to that of 18.5% of cameras.
Video bitrate
30 Mbps
Video bitrate
30 Mbps
â–² Better than 49% of models
Market range: <12 Mbps – >237 Mbps
This camera has a video bitrate of 30 Mbps which is higher than that of 48.6% of cameras and equal to that of 3.9% of cameras.
Video bit depth
8 bit
Video bit depth
8 bit
â–¼ Worse than 12% of models
This camera supports video at 8 bit, a bit depth higher than that of 7.8% of cameras and equal to that of 80.6% of cameras.
Video chroma subsampling
4:2:0
Video chroma subsampling
4:2:0
â–¼ Worse than 22% of models
This camera supports 4:2:0 video chroma subsampling which is more advanced than that of 7.8% of cameras and equal to that of 69.9% of cameras.
Video codecs
Motion JPEG
Show more
Type
compact
Weight
159 g
Weight
159 g
â–² Better than 87% of models
Market range: <142 g – >812 g
This camera weighs 159 g which is lighter than 86.8% of cameras and equal to the weight of 0.2% of cameras.
Width
99 mm
Width
99 mm
â–² Better than 84% of models
Market range: <96 mm – >142.6 mm
This camera has a width of 99 mm which is narrower than 84.5% of cameras and equal to that of 1% of cameras.
Height
57 mm
Height
57 mm
★ Better than 91% of models
Market range: <57.6 mm – >105.8 mm
This camera has a height of 57 mm which is shorter than 90.8% of cameras and equal to that of 1% of cameras.
Thickness
27.8 mm
Thickness
27.8 mm
â–² Better than 82% of models
Market range: <21.9 mm – >92 mm
This camera has a thickness of 27.8 mm which is thinner than 82.3% of cameras and equal to that of 0.3% of cameras.
Show more
Battery life (CIPA)
250 shots
Battery life (CIPA)
250 shots
â–¼ Worse than 72% of models
Market range: <210 shots – >700 shots
This camera has a CIPA-rated battery life of 250 shots, which is shorter than that of 72.1% of cameras and equal to that of 4.2% of cameras.
Battery capacity
660 mAh
Battery capacity
660 mAh
â–¼ Worse than 96% of models
Market range: <700 mAh – >2.2k mAh
This camera has a battery capacity of 660 mAh which is smaller than the batteries in 95.6% of cameras and equal to those in 0.6% of cameras.
Removable battery
yes
Removable battery
yes
â–² Better than 1% of models
This camera has a removable battery, and 98.7% of cameras include one.
USB Power Delivery (PD)
no
USB Power Delivery (PD)
no
â–¼ Worse than 10% of models
This camera does not support USB Power Delivery. 10.1% of cameras support USB Power Delivery.
Wi-Fi connectivity
no
Wi-Fi connectivity
no
â–¼ Worse than 48% of models
This camera does not support Wi-Fi. 47.9% of cameras include this feature.
Wi-Fi version
N/A
Bluetooth connectivity
no
Bluetooth connectivity
no
â–¼ Worse than 23% of models
This camera does not have Bluetooth. 22.7% of cameras support Bluetooth.
Bluetooth version
N/A
USB Type-C
no
USB Type-C
no
â–¼ Worse than 15% of models
This camera does not include USB Type-C. 14.6% of cameras use USB-C.
Show more

Panasonic LUMIX DMC FH25 vs the average camera

246810TotalDisplay & DesignSensor & ImagePhoto FeaturesVideo & AudioBattery & PowerConnectivity & Storage
  • 236 g lighter
    Weight
    159 g
    â–² Better than 87% of models
    Market range: <142 g – >812 g
    This camera is lighter than the average camera (159 g vs 395 g). The average camera weighs 395 g.
    159 g vs 395 g
  • Supports live streaming
    Live streaming (first-party)
    yes
    â–² Better than 72% of models
    This camera supports live streaming, the average camera does not.
  • Supports 24p cinema mode
    24p cinema mode
    yes
    â–² Better than 56% of models
    This camera supports 24p cinema mode, the average camera does not. 44% of cameras support this mode.
  • 0.07 GB more storage
    Internal storage
    0.07 GB
    â–² Better than 88% of models
    Market range: <0 GB – >0.07 GB
    This camera has a higher internal storage than the average camera (0.1 GB vs 0 GB). The average camera offers 0 GB of internal storage.
    0.07 GB vs 0 GB
  • 16.9 mm shorter body
    Height
    57 mm
    ★ Better than 91% of models
    Market range: <57.6 mm – >105.8 mm
    This camera is shorter than the average camera (57 mm vs 73.9 mm). The average camera has a height of 73.9 mm.
    57 mm vs 73.9 mm
  • 20.9 mm narrower
    Width
    99 mm
    â–² Better than 84% of models
    Market range: <96 mm – >142.6 mm
    This camera is narrower than the average camera (99 mm vs 119.9 mm). The average camera has a width of 119.9 mm.
    99 mm vs 119.9 mm
  • 18.2 mm thinner
    Thickness
    27.8 mm
    â–² Better than 82% of models
    Market range: <21.9 mm – >92 mm
    This camera is thinner than the average camera (27.8 mm vs 46 mm). The average camera has a thickness of 46 mm.
    27.8 mm vs 46 mm
  • 2.23x cheaper
    Panasonic LUMIX DMC FH25 is cheaper than the average camera (£130 vs £290).
    £130 vs £290
  • 2.23x cheaper
    Panasonic LUMIX DMC FH25 is cheaper than the average camera (£130 vs £290).
    £130 vs £290
  • 236 g lighter
    Weight
    159 g
    â–² Better than 87% of models
    Market range: <142 g – >812 g
    This camera is lighter than the average camera (159 g vs 395 g). The average camera weighs 395 g.
    159 g vs 395 g
  • 16.9 mm shorter body
    Height
    57 mm
    ★ Better than 91% of models
    Market range: <57.6 mm – >105.8 mm
    This camera is shorter than the average camera (57 mm vs 73.9 mm). The average camera has a height of 73.9 mm.
    57 mm vs 73.9 mm
  • 20.9 mm narrower
    Width
    99 mm
    â–² Better than 84% of models
    Market range: <96 mm – >142.6 mm
    This camera is narrower than the average camera (99 mm vs 119.9 mm). The average camera has a width of 119.9 mm.
    99 mm vs 119.9 mm
  • 18.2 mm thinner
    Thickness
    27.8 mm
    â–² Better than 82% of models
    Market range: <21.9 mm – >92 mm
    This camera is thinner than the average camera (27.8 mm vs 46 mm). The average camera has a thickness of 46 mm.
    27.8 mm vs 46 mm
  • Supports live streaming
    Live streaming (first-party)
    yes
    â–² Better than 72% of models
    This camera supports live streaming, the average camera does not.
  • Supports 24p cinema mode
    24p cinema mode
    yes
    â–² Better than 56% of models
    This camera supports 24p cinema mode, the average camera does not. 44% of cameras support this mode.
  • 0.07 GB more storage
    Internal storage
    0.07 GB
    â–² Better than 88% of models
    Market range: <0 GB – >0.07 GB
    This camera has a higher internal storage than the average camera (0.1 GB vs 0 GB). The average camera offers 0 GB of internal storage.
    0.07 GB vs 0 GB
  • Smaller sensor
    Sensor size
    1/2.3"
    â–¼ Worse than 61% of models
    This camera has a smaller sensor than the average camera (1/2.3" vs APS-C).
    1/2.3" vs APS-C
  • 2.01 µm smaller sensor pixels
    Main camera pixel size
    1.33 µm
    â–¼ Worse than 88% of models
    Market range: <1.33 µm – >5.94 µm
    This camera has smaller sensor pixels than the average camera (1.3 µm vs 3.34 µm). The average sensor pixel size is 3.34 µm.
    1.33 µm vs 3.34 µm
  • 4.2 fps slower mechanical burst
    Continuous shooting (mechanical)
    1.5 fps
    â–¼ Worse than 84% of models
    Market range: <1.08 fps – >10 fps
    This camera has a slower mechanical burst than the average camera (1.5 fps vs 5.7 fps). The average camera reaches 5.7 fps.
    Hi-Speed Burst reaches 4.4 fps at 3 MP.
    1.5 fps vs 5.7 fps
  • 0.3 in smaller screen diagonal
    Screen size
    2.7 in
    â–¼ Worse than 84% of models
    Market range: <2.7 in – >3.2 in
    This camera has a smaller screen than the average camera (2.7 in vs 3 in). The average camera has a screen size of 3 in.
    2.7 in vs 3 in
  • Lacks HDR mode
    HDR mode
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 55% of models
    This camera does not support HDR mode, the average camera does. 55.1% of cameras include HDR mode.
  • Lower video resolution
    Max video resolution
    1,280 px
    â–¼ Worse than 71% of models
    This camera records lower-resolution video than the average camera (1280 px vs 1920 px). The average camera records at 1920 px.
    1280 px vs 1920 px
  • No continuous video AF
    Continuous autofocus (video)
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 71% of models
    This camera does not support continuous autofocus in video, the average camera does.
    focus locked at recording start
  • No hot shoe
    Hot shoe
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 54% of models
    This camera does not have a hot shoe, the average camera does.
  • 10.5% worse value for money
    Panasonic LUMIX DMC FH25 has a worse value-for-money score than the average camera (5.61 vs 6.2).
    5.61 vs 6.2
  • 93% less popular
    Panasonic LUMIX DMC FH25 is less popular than the average camera (1 vs 1.9).
    1 vs 1.93
  • 0.3 in smaller screen diagonal
    Screen size
    2.7 in
    â–¼ Worse than 84% of models
    Market range: <2.7 in – >3.2 in
    This camera has a smaller screen than the average camera (2.7 in vs 3 in). The average camera has a screen size of 3 in.
    2.7 in vs 3 in
  • No hot shoe
    Hot shoe
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 54% of models
    This camera does not have a hot shoe, the average camera does.
  • Smaller sensor
    Sensor size
    1/2.3"
    â–¼ Worse than 61% of models
    This camera has a smaller sensor than the average camera (1/2.3" vs APS-C).
    1/2.3" vs APS-C
  • 2.01 µm smaller sensor pixels
    Main camera pixel size
    1.33 µm
    â–¼ Worse than 88% of models
    Market range: <1.33 µm – >5.94 µm
    This camera has smaller sensor pixels than the average camera (1.3 µm vs 3.34 µm). The average sensor pixel size is 3.34 µm.
    1.33 µm vs 3.34 µm
  • Lacks HDR mode
    HDR mode
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 55% of models
    This camera does not support HDR mode, the average camera does. 55.1% of cameras include HDR mode.
  • 2 older
    Release date
    2011
    â–¼ Worse than 77% of models
    Market range: <2k – >2k
    This camera is older than the average camera (2011 vs 2013). The average camera was released in 2013.
    January 2011
    2,011 vs 2,013
  • Lower sensor resolution
    Main camera megapixels
    16.1 MP
    â–¼ Worse than 53% of models
    This camera has a lower sensor resolution than the average camera (16.1 MP vs 16.2 MP). The average camera has a sensor resolution of 16.2 MP.
    16.1 MP vs 16.2 MP
  • 4.2 fps slower mechanical burst
    Continuous shooting (mechanical)
    1.5 fps
    â–¼ Worse than 84% of models
    Market range: <1.08 fps – >10 fps
    This camera has a slower mechanical burst than the average camera (1.5 fps vs 5.7 fps). The average camera reaches 5.7 fps.
    Hi-Speed Burst reaches 4.4 fps at 3 MP.
    1.5 fps vs 5.7 fps
  • No RAW photo capture
    RAW photo capture
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 63% of models
    This camera does not support RAW photo capture, the average camera does. 62.8% of cameras support RAW formats.
  • No manual focus mode
    Manual focus
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 72% of models
    This camera does not support manual focus, the average camera does. 71.7% of cameras include a manual focus mode.
  • No manual exposure control
    Manual exposure
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 72% of models
    This camera does not support manual exposure, the average camera does. 72% of cameras support manual exposure controls.
  • 12 fewer AF points
    N. of focus points
    11
    â–¼ Worse than 60% of models
    Market range: <9 – >399
    This camera has fewer focus points than the average camera (11 vs 23). The average camera offers 23 focus points.
    11 vs 23
  • Lower video resolution
    Max video resolution
    1,280 px
    â–¼ Worse than 71% of models
    This camera records lower-resolution video than the average camera (1280 px vs 1920 px). The average camera records at 1920 px.
    1280 px vs 1920 px
  • No continuous video AF
    Continuous autofocus (video)
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 71% of models
    This camera does not support continuous autofocus in video, the average camera does.
    focus locked at recording start
  • 1 fewer microphones
    N. of microphones
    1
    â–¼ Worse than 63% of models
    Market range: <1 – >2
    This camera has fewer microphones than the average camera (1 vs 2). The average camera has 2 microphones.
    1 vs 2
  • 1 min shorter recording time
    Max video recording time
    29 min
    â–¼ Worse than 82% of models
    Market range: <25 min – >60 min
    This camera records continuously for less time than the average camera (29 min vs 30 min). The average camera records for 30 min.
    29 min vs 30 min
  • 460 mAh smaller battery capacity
    Battery capacity
    660 mAh
    â–¼ Worse than 96% of models
    Market range: <700 mAh – >2.2k mAh
    This camera has a lower battery capacity than the average camera (660 mAh vs 1120 mAh). The average camera has a battery capacity of 1120 mAh.
    660 mAh vs 1,120 mAh
  • 80 shots fewer shots per charge
    Battery life (CIPA)
    250 shots
    â–¼ Worse than 72% of models
    Market range: <210 shots – >700 shots
    This camera has shorter battery life than the average camera (250 shots vs 330 shots). The average camera delivers 330 shots per charge.
    250 shots vs 330 shots

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

H
hardwarezone.com.sg
12/07/2011
Summary of the review
Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH25 - A Triple Whammy Surprise
C
cnet.com
27/07/2011
Summary of the review
Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH25 - review - CNET
O
oinkety.com
06/12/2011
Summary of the review
Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH25 camera review - Oink
J
jpolak.org
26/01/2024
Summary of the review
Retro Review: Panasonic DMC-FH25/DMC-FS35 - Jason Polak Imaging Resource
C
camerarace.com
05/01/2011
Summary of the review
Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH25 - Review and specifications
(Translated)Show original

Third-party reviews

What we like about Panasonic LUMIX DMC FH25

  • Compact, pocket-sized design makes it highly portable and convenient for daily use.
  • Intuitive user interface and straightforward menus make it very easy to use for beginners.
  • Impressive 8x optical zoom capability provides broad reach for a slim compact camera.
  • Effective built-in optical image stabilization reduces blur from shaky hands.
  • Intelligent Auto mode produces solid results across standard lighting environments.
  • Reliable battery life delivers a high number of shots per full charge.
  • Affordable pricing offers high value for money as an entry-level point-and-shoot camera.

What we don't like about Panasonic LUMIX DMC FH25

  • Optical zoom is completely non-functional while actively recording video.
  • Noticeable drop in image quality and clarity at higher focal lengths.
  • Poor low-light and high-ISO performance leads to noisy and smeary image details.
  • Complete lack of advanced manual controls for focus, shutter speed, or aperture.
  • Absence of a physical optical viewfinder requires full reliance on the rear LCD screen.
  • Does not support shooting in RAW format, limiting post-processing capabilities.
  • Lacks a dedicated video recording button, requiring users to change modes via menus.

Verdict

The Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH25 is a sleek, pocket-sized compact camera featuring a 16.1-megapixel CCD sensor and a high-quality Leica DC Vario-Elmar 8x optical zoom lens (28–224mm equivalent). Powered by the Venus Engine VI processor, it offers fast performance with 'Sonic Speed' autofocus and Mega Optical Image Stabilization (O.I.S.) to minimize blur during handheld shooting. Key highlights include 720p HD video recording, an Intelligent Auto (iA) mode for simplified operation, and a 2.7-inch LCD screen. While it excels in portability and ease of use, notable drawbacks include subpar low-light performance due to its small 1/2.3-inch sensor, a lack of optical zoom functionality while recording video, and the absence of manual exposure controls.

Compare Panasonic LUMIX DMC FH25 with other products in the Cameras category

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Panasonic LUMIX DMC FH25 and other products in the Cameras category

No results found