OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS

Philips SpeedPro FC6723/01 Review | 52 Data compared

Avg. price:~£130Suction power (AW):?Battery runtime:30 minutesCapacity:0.4 LWeight:2.43 kg

Philips SpeedPro FC6723/01 Review: Compare 52 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Vacuum Cleaners category and whether it is worth buying.

4.9

Overall score

Score
4.9/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the vacuum cleaner's quality, based on technical analysis and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference for identifying the best vacuum cleaners on the market.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 99% of models
Score components

80%

4.9

Technical Score

20%

?

User score

â–¼Worse than 99% of vacuum-cleaners
4.9

Technical Score

Technical score
4.9/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of the vacuum cleaner's technical performance across six key areas: performance, battery and power supply, filtration, attachments, design, and smart features.
When it matters
When you want to compare vacuum cleaners by cleaning performance, specifications, and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 99% of models
Score components

28%

4.6

Performance

22%

3.9

Battery

18%

4.8

Filtration

14%

5.1

Attachments

10%

7.9

Design

8%

5.2

Smart features

â–¼Worse than 99% of vacuum-cleaners
?

User score

User score
8.0/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews with the total number of reviews received by the vacuum cleaner.
When it matters
When you want to know how a vacuum cleaner performs in everyday use and how reliable owners find it over time.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 73% of models
Score components

70%

?

User ratings

30%

?

Number of reviews

  • No image
No image

Best prices

    N/A~ £130
*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.

Best rankings

Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Loading category ranking...

Verdict

The Philips SpeedPro FC6723/01 is an 18V bagless, cordless 2-in-1 stick and handheld vacuum cleaner weighing 2.43 kg, engineered with a PowerBlade motor that achieves an airflow of up to 800 L/min and uses PowerCyclone 7 technology to separate dust into its 0.4L capacity bin. Its main characteristics and advantages include a 180-degree suction nozzle with built-in LEDs to capture up to 98% of dirt per stroke in tight spots, a washable filter system, and a lithium-ion battery delivering up to 30 minutes of standard runtime or 15 minutes in turbo mode. However, notable drawbacks include a relatively long 5-hour charging time, a loud 80 dB operating noise, a flat-shaped intake tube that can restrict larger debris, and a limited battery life when using max power settings.

Technical Specifications of vacuum cleaner Philips SpeedPro FC6723/01

Technical Score
Technical score
4.9/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of the vacuum cleaner's technical performance across six key areas: performance, battery and power supply, filtration, attachments, design, and smart features.
When it matters
When you want to compare vacuum cleaners by cleaning performance, specifications, and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 99% of models
Score components:

28%

4.6

Performance

22%

3.9

Battery

18%

4.8

Filtration

14%

5.1

Attachments

10%

7.9

Design

8%

5.2

Smart features

4.9
Philips SpeedPro FC6723/01 has a technical score of 4.9 points, which is lower than 99.8% of vacuum cleaners.
User score
User score
8.0/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews with the total number of reviews received by the vacuum cleaner.
When it matters
When you want to know how a vacuum cleaner performs in everyday use and how reliable owners find it over time.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 73% of models
Score components

70%

?

User ratings

30%

?

Number of reviews

?
Popularity
Popularity
1.0/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the vacuum cleaner.
When it matters
When you prefer a vacuum cleaner that has been chosen and reviewed by many other buyers.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 99% of models
Popularity:
Philips SpeedPro FC6723/01 has a popularity score of 1 point, which is lower than 61.7% of vacuum cleaners.
1.0
Philips SpeedPro FC6723/01 has a popularity score of 1 point, which is lower than 61.7% of vacuum cleaners.
Ratio quality/price
Value for money
6.4/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the vacuum cleaner's overall score with its price.
When it matters
When you are looking for a vacuum cleaner with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 99% of models
Score components:

60%

4.9

Overall score

40%

9.8

Price

6.4
Philips SpeedPro FC6723/01 has a value-for-money score of 6.4 points, which is lower than 99.7% of vacuum cleaners.
Suction power (AW)
?
Suction power (kPa)
8 kPa
Suction power (kPa)
8 kPa
â–¼ Worse than 96% of models
Market range: <11 kPa – >30 kPa
This vacuum cleaner has a suction pressure of 8 kPa, which is lower than that of 95.7% of vacuum cleaners and equal to that of 1.1% of vacuum cleaners.
Airflow
13.33 L/s
Airflow
13.33 L/s
â–¼ Worse than 95% of models
Market range: <16.5 L/s – >52 L/s
This vacuum cleaner delivers 13.33 L/s airflow, which is lower than that of 94.9% of vacuum cleaners and equal to that of 1.1% of vacuum cleaners.
Motor type
powerblade
Power consumption
?
Show more
Cordless
yes
Cordless
yes
â–² Better than 51% of models
This vacuum cleaner works cordlessly. 49.5% of vacuum cleaners offer cordless operation.
Battery runtime
30 minutes
Battery runtime
30 minutes
â–¼ Worse than 89% of models
Market range: <30 minutes – >70 minutes
This vacuum cleaner offers a battery runtime of 30 minutes, which is shorter than that of 89.1% of vacuum cleaners and equal to that of 6.4% of vacuum cleaners.
Charging time
5 hours
Charging time
5 hours
â–¼ Worse than 74% of models
Market range: <3 hours – >5 hours
This vacuum cleaner charges in 5 hours, which is slower than 73.8% of vacuum cleaners and equal to 20.4% of vacuum cleaners.
Battery capacity
2000 mAh
Battery capacity
2000 mAh
â–¼ Worse than 80% of models
Market range: <2k mAh – >3.6k mAh
This vacuum cleaner has a battery capacity of 2000 mAh, which is smaller than that of 79.6% of vacuum cleaners and equal to that of 18.1% of vacuum cleaners.
Battery voltage
18 V
Battery voltage
18 V
â–¼ Worse than 80% of models
Market range: <18 V – >28.8 V
This vacuum cleaner uses a battery voltage of 18 V, which is lower than that of 79.8% of vacuum cleaners and equal to that of 16% of vacuum cleaners.
Show more
Filter class
hepa
Filter class
hepa
â–¼ Worse than 38% of models
This vacuum cleaner uses filter class hepa, which is more advanced than the class used by 16% of vacuum cleaners and the same as the class used by 46% of vacuum cleaners.
Minimum overall efficiency
85%
Minimum overall efficiency
85%
â–¼ Worse than 95% of models
Market range: <95 % – >99.99 %
This vacuum cleaner reaches 85% minimum overall efficiency, which is lower than that of 94.6% of vacuum cleaners and equal to that of 5.4% of vacuum cleaners.
Suitable for allergy sufferers
no
Suitable for allergy sufferers
no
â–¼ Worse than 83% of models
This vacuum cleaner is not suitable for allergy sufferers. 82.4% of vacuum cleaners are allergy-friendly.
Capacity
0.4 L
Capacity
0.4 L
â–¼ Worse than 91% of models
Market range: <0.44 L – >4 L
This vacuum cleaner has a dust capacity of 0.4 L, which is smaller than that of 90.7% of vacuum cleaners and equal to that of 4.5% of vacuum cleaners.
Bagless
yes
Bagless
yes
â–² Better than 21% of models
This vacuum cleaner uses a bagless design. 78.6% of vacuum cleaners use this setup.
Show more
Main brush type
roll brush
Roller type
bristled
Anti-tangle brush
no
Anti-tangle brush
no
â–¼ Worse than 26% of models
This vacuum cleaner does not include an anti-tangle brush. 25.7% of vacuum cleaners include this feature.
Mini motorized brush
no
Mini motorized brush
no
â–¼ Worse than 27% of models
This vacuum cleaner does not include a mini motorized brush. 26.9% of vacuum cleaners include this attachment.
Suitable for pet owners
no
Suitable for pet owners
no
â–¼ Worse than 72% of models
This vacuum cleaner is not suitable for pet owners. 72% of vacuum cleaners handle pet hair well.
Show more
Vacuum type
stick
Weight
2.43 kg
Weight
2.43 kg
â–² Better than 82% of models
Market range: <2.15 kg – >7.1 kg
This vacuum cleaner weighs 2.43 kg, which is lower than the weight of 81.6% of vacuum cleaners and equal to that of 0.2% of vacuum cleaners.
2-in-1 design
yes
2-in-1 design
yes
â–² Better than 47% of models
This vacuum cleaner offers a 2-in-1 design. 53% of vacuum cleaners offer this flexible format.
Self-standing
no
Self-standing
no
â–¼ Worse than 19% of models
This vacuum cleaner does not stand on its own. 18.9% of vacuum cleaners offer this convenience.
Adjustable tube height
no
Adjustable tube height
no
â–¼ Worse than 47% of models
This vacuum cleaner does not include adjustable tube height. 47.4% of vacuum cleaners offer this ergonomic feature.
Show more
Auto suction adjustment
no
Auto suction adjustment
no
â–¼ Worse than 20% of models
This vacuum cleaner does not support automatic suction adjustment. 19.9% of vacuum cleaners support this feature.
Dust particle sensor
no
Dust particle sensor
no
â–¼ Worse than 8% of models
This vacuum cleaner does not include a dust particle sensor. 8% of vacuum cleaners include this feature.
LED display
no
LED display
no
â–¼ Worse than 26% of models
This vacuum cleaner does not include an LED display. 25.9% of vacuum cleaners include this interface feature.
Nozzle light
yes
Nozzle light
yes
â–² Better than 57% of models
This vacuum cleaner includes a nozzle light. 43.4% of vacuum cleaners include this visibility feature.
Mopping support
no
Mopping support
no
â–¼ Worse than 4% of models
This vacuum cleaner does not support mopping. 3.7% of vacuum cleaners support this multi-function feature.

Philips SpeedPro FC6723/01 vs the average vacuum cleaner

246810TotalPerformanceBatteryFiltrationAttachmentsDesignSmart features
  • Cordless operation
    Cordless
    yes
    â–² Better than 51% of models
    This vacuum cleaner works cordlessly, the average vacuum cleaner does not.
  • 32.9% lower weight
    Weight
    2.43 kg
    â–² Better than 82% of models
    Market range: <2.15 kg – >7.1 kg
    This vacuum cleaner is lighter than the average vacuum cleaner (2.4 kg vs 3.62 kg).
    2.43 kg vs 3.62 kg
  • Includes nozzle light
    Nozzle light
    yes
    â–² Better than 57% of models
    This vacuum cleaner includes a nozzle light, the average vacuum cleaner does not.
  • Includes wall bracket
    Wall-mounted bracket
    yes
    â–² Better than 64% of models
    This vacuum cleaner includes a wall-mounted bracket, the average vacuum cleaner does not.
  • 95 mm narrower body
    Width
    170 mm
    ★ Better than 96% of models
    Market range: <229 mm – >350 mm
    This vacuum cleaner is narrower than the average vacuum cleaner (170 mm vs 265 mm).
    170 mm vs 265 mm
  • 95 mm shallower body
    Depth
    170 mm
    â–² Better than 89% of models
    Market range: <170 mm – >440 mm
    This vacuum cleaner is less deep than the average vacuum cleaner (170 mm vs 265 mm).
    170 mm vs 265 mm
  • 3 minutes longer turbo runtime
    Turbo mode runtime
    15 minutes
    â–² Better than 62% of models
    Market range: <6 minutes – >20 minutes
    This vacuum cleaner offers longer turbo runtime than the average vacuum cleaner (15 minutes vs 12 minutes).
    15 minutes vs 12 minutes
  • 330 mm shorter body
    Height
    770 mm
    â–² Better than 65% of models
    Market range: <290 mm – >1.2k mm
    This vacuum cleaner is shorter than the average vacuum cleaner (770 mm vs 1100 mm).
    770 mm vs 1,100 mm
  • Cordless operation
    Cordless
    yes
    â–² Better than 51% of models
    This vacuum cleaner works cordlessly, the average vacuum cleaner does not.
  • 3 minutes longer turbo runtime
    Turbo mode runtime
    15 minutes
    â–² Better than 62% of models
    Market range: <6 minutes – >20 minutes
    This vacuum cleaner offers longer turbo runtime than the average vacuum cleaner (15 minutes vs 12 minutes).
    15 minutes vs 12 minutes
  • 32.9% lower weight
    Weight
    2.43 kg
    â–² Better than 82% of models
    Market range: <2.15 kg – >7.1 kg
    This vacuum cleaner is lighter than the average vacuum cleaner (2.4 kg vs 3.62 kg).
    2.43 kg vs 3.62 kg
  • Includes wall bracket
    Wall-mounted bracket
    yes
    â–² Better than 64% of models
    This vacuum cleaner includes a wall-mounted bracket, the average vacuum cleaner does not.
  • 95 mm narrower body
    Width
    170 mm
    ★ Better than 96% of models
    Market range: <229 mm – >350 mm
    This vacuum cleaner is narrower than the average vacuum cleaner (170 mm vs 265 mm).
    170 mm vs 265 mm
  • 95 mm shallower body
    Depth
    170 mm
    â–² Better than 89% of models
    Market range: <170 mm – >440 mm
    This vacuum cleaner is less deep than the average vacuum cleaner (170 mm vs 265 mm).
    170 mm vs 265 mm
  • 330 mm shorter body
    Height
    770 mm
    â–² Better than 65% of models
    Market range: <290 mm – >1.2k mm
    This vacuum cleaner is shorter than the average vacuum cleaner (770 mm vs 1100 mm).
    770 mm vs 1,100 mm
  • Includes nozzle light
    Nozzle light
    yes
    â–² Better than 57% of models
    This vacuum cleaner includes a nozzle light, the average vacuum cleaner does not.
  • 20 minutes shorter runtime
    Battery runtime
    30 minutes
    â–¼ Worse than 89% of models
    Market range: <30 minutes – >70 minutes
    This vacuum cleaner offers shorter battery runtime than the average vacuum cleaner (30 minutes vs 50 minutes).
    30 minutes vs 50 minutes
  • 12 kPa lower suction pressure
    Suction power (kPa)
    8 kPa
    â–¼ Worse than 96% of models
    Market range: <11 kPa – >30 kPa
    This vacuum cleaner has lower suction pressure than the average vacuum cleaner (8 kPa vs 20 kPa).
    8 kPa vs 20 kPa
  • 14.47 L/s lower airflow
    Airflow
    13.33 L/s
    â–¼ Worse than 95% of models
    Market range: <16.5 L/s – >52 L/s
    This vacuum cleaner delivers lower airflow than the average vacuum cleaner (13.3 L/s vs 27.8 L/s).
    13.33 L/s vs 27.8 L/s
  • 0.6 L smaller dust container
    Capacity
    0.4 L
    â–¼ Worse than 91% of models
    Market range: <0.44 L – >4 L
    This vacuum cleaner has a smaller dust capacity than the average vacuum cleaner (0.4 L vs 1 L).
    0.4 L vs 1 L
  • 14.95 % lower filtration efficiency
    Minimum overall efficiency
    85 %
    â–¼ Worse than 95% of models
    Market range: <95 % – >99.99 %
    This vacuum cleaner has lower filtration efficiency than the average vacuum cleaner (85 % vs 99.95 %).
    85 % vs 99.95 %
  • 1 hours slower charging
    Charging time
    5 hours
    â–¼ Worse than 74% of models
    Market range: <3 hours – >5 hours
    This vacuum cleaner charges slower than the average vacuum cleaner (5 hours vs 4 hours).
    5 hours vs 4 hours
  • Not pet-hair friendly
    Suitable for pet owners
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 72% of models
    This vacuum cleaner is not suitable for pet owners, the average vacuum cleaner is.
  • 500 mAh smaller battery capacity
    Battery capacity
    2000 mAh
    â–¼ Worse than 80% of models
    Market range: <2k mAh – >3.6k mAh
    This vacuum cleaner has a smaller battery capacity than the average vacuum cleaner (2000 mAh vs 2500 mAh).
    2,000 mAh vs 2,500 mAh
  • 19.2% worse value for money
    Philips SpeedPro FC6723/01 offers worse value for money than the average vacuum cleaner (6.42 vs 7.6).
    6.42 vs 7.65
  • 12 kPa lower suction pressure
    Suction power (kPa)
    8 kPa
    â–¼ Worse than 96% of models
    Market range: <11 kPa – >30 kPa
    This vacuum cleaner has lower suction pressure than the average vacuum cleaner (8 kPa vs 20 kPa).
    8 kPa vs 20 kPa
  • 14.47 L/s lower airflow
    Airflow
    13.33 L/s
    â–¼ Worse than 95% of models
    Market range: <16.5 L/s – >52 L/s
    This vacuum cleaner delivers lower airflow than the average vacuum cleaner (13.3 L/s vs 27.8 L/s).
    13.33 L/s vs 27.8 L/s
  • More operating noise
    Noise level (Min-Max)
    80-80 dB
    â–¼ Worse than 62% of models
    Market range: <65 dB – >83 dB
    This vacuum cleaner is noisier than the average vacuum cleaner (80-80 dB vs 77-77 dB).
    80-80 dB vs 77-77 dB
  • 20 minutes shorter runtime
    Battery runtime
    30 minutes
    â–¼ Worse than 89% of models
    Market range: <30 minutes – >70 minutes
    This vacuum cleaner offers shorter battery runtime than the average vacuum cleaner (30 minutes vs 50 minutes).
    30 minutes vs 50 minutes
  • 1 hours slower charging
    Charging time
    5 hours
    â–¼ Worse than 74% of models
    Market range: <3 hours – >5 hours
    This vacuum cleaner charges slower than the average vacuum cleaner (5 hours vs 4 hours).
    5 hours vs 4 hours
  • 500 mAh smaller battery capacity
    Battery capacity
    2000 mAh
    â–¼ Worse than 80% of models
    Market range: <2k mAh – >3.6k mAh
    This vacuum cleaner has a smaller battery capacity than the average vacuum cleaner (2000 mAh vs 2500 mAh).
    2,000 mAh vs 2,500 mAh
  • 4.2 V lower voltage
    Battery voltage
    18 V
    â–¼ Worse than 80% of models
    Market range: <18 V – >28.8 V
    This vacuum cleaner has a lower battery voltage than the average vacuum cleaner (18 V vs 22.2 V).
    18 V vs 22.2 V
  • 0.6 L smaller dust container
    Capacity
    0.4 L
    â–¼ Worse than 91% of models
    Market range: <0.44 L – >4 L
    This vacuum cleaner has a smaller dust capacity than the average vacuum cleaner (0.4 L vs 1 L).
    0.4 L vs 1 L
  • 14.95 % lower filtration efficiency
    Minimum overall efficiency
    85 %
    â–¼ Worse than 95% of models
    Market range: <95 % – >99.99 %
    This vacuum cleaner has lower filtration efficiency than the average vacuum cleaner (85 % vs 99.95 %).
    85 % vs 99.95 %
  • Not allergy-friendly
    Suitable for allergy sufferers
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 83% of models
    This vacuum cleaner is not suitable for allergy sufferers, the average vacuum cleaner is.
  • Not pet-hair friendly
    Suitable for pet owners
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 72% of models
    This vacuum cleaner is not suitable for pet owners, the average vacuum cleaner is.
  • No upholstery nozzle
    Upholstery nozzle
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 68% of models
    This vacuum cleaner does not include an upholstery nozzle, the average vacuum cleaner does.

Graphic comparison of Philips SpeedPro FC6723/01 and other vacuum cleaners

No results found

Third-party reviews

What customers like about Philips SpeedPro FC6723/01?

  • Useful integrated LED nozzle lights that reveal hidden dust and dirt
  • Highly maneuverable, lightweight, and flexible design that lays flat under low furniture
  • Convenient 2-in-1 functionality with a detachable handheld unit and integrated stick brush
  • Easy-to-empty dust bucket that minimizes dust clouds
  • Good performance for quick, daily light cleaning on hard floors and carpets

What customers dislike about Philips SpeedPro FC6723/01?

  • Weak suction power, especially when dealing with large debris or deep cleaning
  • Hair and fibers easily tangle around the brush roller and clog the intake
  • Short battery life that only lasts about 15 minutes in Turbo mode
  • Long overall charging time and a tedious charging station dock mechanism
  • The motor can be quite loud during operation

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

T
theinsidersnet.com
30/09/2019
Summary of the review
REVIEW OF SPEEDPRO FC6723 - The Insiders.
T
theinsidersnet.com
08/10/2019
Summary of the review
Review of the Philip cordless vacuum stick
S
spiegel.de
23/02/2020
Summary of the review
Cleanliness Unplugged: Cordless Handheld Vacuum Cleaner Review
(Translated)Show original
S
smarthomeassistent.de
09/08/2023
Summary of the review
Philips SpeedPro FC6723/01 - Our review with comparison, features, differences, vacuuming results, functions, and much more!
(Translated)Show original
A
altroconsumo.it
01/08/2020
Summary of the review
The cordless vacuum cleaner test: PHILIPS FC6723/01 Archive
(Translated)Show original
C
consumentenbond.nl
Onbekend
Summary of the review
Philips FC6723/01 SpeedPro - Test, Reviews & Prices. View the full test results on Consumentenbond.
(Translated)Show original

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

Compare Philips SpeedPro FC6723/01 with other vacuum cleaners

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)