OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS

Miele Classic C1 Turbo Team Review | 52 Data compared

Avg. price:~£390Suction power (AW):?Battery runtime:N/A minutesCapacity:4.5 LWeight:5.8 kg

Miele Classic C1 Turbo Team Review: Compare 52 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Vacuum Cleaners category and whether it is worth buying.

6.3

Overall score

Score
6.3/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the vacuum cleaner's quality, based on technical analysis and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference for identifying the best vacuum cleaners on the market.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 83% of models
Score components

80%

6.3

Technical Score

20%

?

User score

â–¼Worse than 83% of vacuum-cleaners
6.3

Technical Score

Technical score
6.3/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of the vacuum cleaner's technical performance across six key areas: performance, battery and power supply, filtration, attachments, design, and smart features.
When it matters
When you want to compare vacuum cleaners by cleaning performance, specifications, and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 69% of models
Score components

28%

8.0

Performance

22%

3.7

Battery

18%

7.0

Filtration

14%

7.9

Attachments

10%

5.3

Design

8%

4.0

Smart features

â–¼Worse than 69% of vacuum-cleaners
?

User score

User score
8.0/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews with the total number of reviews received by the vacuum cleaner.
When it matters
When you want to know how a vacuum cleaner performs in everyday use and how reliable owners find it over time.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 73% of models
Score components

70%

?

User ratings

30%

?

Number of reviews

  • No image
No image

Best prices

    N/A~ £390
*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.

Best rankings

Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Loading category ranking...

Verdict

The Miele Classic C1 Turbo Team is a bagged canister vacuum powered by a quiet 1200-watt PowerLine motor and equipped with a 6-stage rotary suction control dial. Weighing 5.85 lbs (canister only) with a 29.5-foot operating radius, it features a 4.76-quart GN dustbag capacity, an AirClean 3-stage filtration system, a 24-foot power cord with automatic rewind, and a stainless steel telescopic wand. Main pros include its durable German-engineered build, exceptional cleaning performance on hard floors using the Parquet Twister brush, and efficient pick-up on low-to-medium pile carpets with the air-driven TurboTeQ floorhead. However, notable cons include its lack of an electric powerhead connection, which causes the air-driven brush to struggle on thick, high-pile carpets or with heavy pet hair, alongside a relatively short power cord and a standard filtration system that requires buying the HEPA filter separately.

Technical Specifications of vacuum cleaner Miele Classic C1 Turbo Team

Technical Score
Technical score
6.3/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of the vacuum cleaner's technical performance across six key areas: performance, battery and power supply, filtration, attachments, design, and smart features.
When it matters
When you want to compare vacuum cleaners by cleaning performance, specifications, and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 69% of models
Score components:

28%

8.0

Performance

22%

3.7

Battery

18%

7.0

Filtration

14%

7.9

Attachments

10%

5.3

Design

8%

4.0

Smart features

6.3
Miele Classic C1 Turbo Team has a technical score of 6.3 points, which is lower than 68.6% of vacuum cleaners.
User score
User score
8.0/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews with the total number of reviews received by the vacuum cleaner.
When it matters
When you want to know how a vacuum cleaner performs in everyday use and how reliable owners find it over time.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 73% of models
Score components

70%

?

User ratings

30%

?

Number of reviews

?
Popularity
Popularity
1.0/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the vacuum cleaner.
When it matters
When you prefer a vacuum cleaner that has been chosen and reviewed by many other buyers.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 99% of models
Popularity:
Miele Classic C1 Turbo Team has a popularity score of 1 point, which is lower than 61.7% of vacuum cleaners.
1.0
Miele Classic C1 Turbo Team has a popularity score of 1 point, which is lower than 61.7% of vacuum cleaners.
Ratio quality/price
Value for money
6.9/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the vacuum cleaner's overall score with its price.
When it matters
When you are looking for a vacuum cleaner with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 99% of models
Score components:

60%

6.3

Overall score

40%

8.5

Price

6.9
Miele Classic C1 Turbo Team has a value-for-money score of 6.9 points, which is lower than 97.9% of vacuum cleaners.
Suction power (AW)
?
Suction power (kPa)
21.47 kPa
Suction power (kPa)
21.47 kPa
â–² Better than 65% of models
Market range: <11 kPa – >30 kPa
This vacuum cleaner has a suction pressure of 21.47 kPa, which is higher than that of 64.6% of vacuum cleaners and equal to that of 0.9% of vacuum cleaners.
Airflow
66.07 L/s
Airflow
66.07 L/s
★ Better than 93% of models
Market range: <16.5 L/s – >52 L/s
This vacuum cleaner delivers 66.07 L/s airflow, which is higher than that of 92.6% of vacuum cleaners and equal to that of 1.7% of vacuum cleaners.
Motor type
powerline
Power consumption
1,200 W
Power consumption
1,200 W
â–¼ Worse than 97% of models
Market range: <165 W – >899 W
This vacuum cleaner draws 1,200 W, which is higher than the power consumption of 97.4% of vacuum cleaners and equal to that of 1.5% of vacuum cleaners.
Show more
Cordless
no
Cordless
no
â–¼ Worse than 50% of models
This vacuum cleaner does not work cordlessly. 49.5% of vacuum cleaners offer cordless operation.
Battery runtime
N/A
Charging time
N/A
Battery capacity
N/A
Battery voltage
N/A
Show more
Filter class
airclean
Filter class
airclean
â–¼ Worse than 87% of models
This vacuum cleaner uses filter class airclean, which is less advanced than the class used by 86.9% of vacuum cleaners and the same as the class used by 1.1% of vacuum cleaners.
Minimum overall efficiency
99.9%
Minimum overall efficiency
99.9%
â–¼ Worse than 68% of models
Market range: <95 % – >99.99 %
This vacuum cleaner reaches 99.9% minimum overall efficiency, which is lower than that of 68.1% of vacuum cleaners and equal to that of 10.6% of vacuum cleaners.
Suitable for allergy sufferers
no
Suitable for allergy sufferers
no
â–¼ Worse than 83% of models
This vacuum cleaner is not suitable for allergy sufferers. 82.4% of vacuum cleaners are allergy-friendly.
Capacity
4.5 L
Capacity
4.5 L
★ Better than 93% of models
Market range: <0.44 L – >4 L
This vacuum cleaner has a dust capacity of 4.5 L, which is larger than that of 92.9% of vacuum cleaners and equal to that of 3.4% of vacuum cleaners.
Bagless
no
Bagless
no
â–¼ Worse than 79% of models
This vacuum cleaner does not use a bagless design. 78.6% of vacuum cleaners use this setup.
Show more
Main brush type
roll brush
Roller type
bristled
Anti-tangle brush
no
Anti-tangle brush
no
â–¼ Worse than 26% of models
This vacuum cleaner does not include an anti-tangle brush. 25.7% of vacuum cleaners include this feature.
Mini motorized brush
no
Mini motorized brush
no
â–¼ Worse than 27% of models
This vacuum cleaner does not include a mini motorized brush. 26.9% of vacuum cleaners include this attachment.
Suitable for pet owners
yes
Suitable for pet owners
yes
â–² Better than 28% of models
This vacuum cleaner is suitable for pet owners. 72% of vacuum cleaners handle pet hair well.
Show more
Vacuum type
canister
Weight
5.8 kg
Weight
5.8 kg
â–¼ Worse than 78% of models
Market range: <2.15 kg – >7.1 kg
This vacuum cleaner weighs 5.8 kg, which is greater than the weight of 77.9% of vacuum cleaners and equal to that of 0.6% of vacuum cleaners.
2-in-1 design
no
2-in-1 design
no
â–¼ Worse than 53% of models
This vacuum cleaner does not offer a 2-in-1 design. 53% of vacuum cleaners offer this flexible format.
Self-standing
no
Self-standing
no
â–¼ Worse than 19% of models
This vacuum cleaner does not stand on its own. 18.9% of vacuum cleaners offer this convenience.
Adjustable tube height
yes
Adjustable tube height
yes
â–² Better than 53% of models
This vacuum cleaner includes adjustable tube height. 47.4% of vacuum cleaners offer this ergonomic feature.
Show more
Auto suction adjustment
no
Auto suction adjustment
no
â–¼ Worse than 20% of models
This vacuum cleaner does not support automatic suction adjustment. 19.9% of vacuum cleaners support this feature.
Dust particle sensor
no
Dust particle sensor
no
â–¼ Worse than 8% of models
This vacuum cleaner does not include a dust particle sensor. 8% of vacuum cleaners include this feature.
LED display
no
LED display
no
â–¼ Worse than 26% of models
This vacuum cleaner does not include an LED display. 25.9% of vacuum cleaners include this interface feature.
Nozzle light
no
Nozzle light
no
â–¼ Worse than 43% of models
This vacuum cleaner does not include a nozzle light. 43.4% of vacuum cleaners include this visibility feature.
Mopping support
no
Mopping support
no
â–¼ Worse than 4% of models
This vacuum cleaner does not support mopping. 3.7% of vacuum cleaners support this multi-function feature.

Miele Classic C1 Turbo Team vs the average vacuum cleaner

246810TotalPerformanceBatteryFiltrationAttachmentsDesignSmart features
  • 38.27 L/s higher airflow
    Airflow
    66.07 L/s
    ★ Better than 93% of models
    Market range: <16.5 L/s – >52 L/s
    This vacuum cleaner delivers higher airflow than the average vacuum cleaner (66.1 L/s vs 27.8 L/s).
    66.07 L/s vs 27.8 L/s
  • Less operating noise
    Noise level (Min-Max)
    62-67 dB
    ★ Better than 92% of models
    Market range: <65 dB – >83 dB
    This vacuum cleaner is quieter than the average vacuum cleaner (62-67 dB vs 77-77 dB).
    62-67 dB vs 77-77 dB
  • Includes parquet brush
    Parquet brush
    yes
    â–² Better than 77% of models
    This vacuum cleaner includes a parquet brush, the average vacuum cleaner does not.
  • 4 more power levels
    Number of speeds
    6
    ★ Better than 97% of models
    Market range: <1 – >4
    This vacuum cleaner offers more speed levels than the average vacuum cleaner (6 vs 2).
    6 vs 2
  • 3.5 L larger dust container
    Capacity
    4.5 L
    ★ Better than 93% of models
    Market range: <0.44 L – >4 L
    This vacuum cleaner has a larger dust capacity than the average vacuum cleaner (4.5 L vs 1 L).
    4.5 L vs 1 L
  • Includes full bin indicator
    Full bin indicator
    yes
    â–² Better than 73% of models
    This vacuum cleaner includes a full bin indicator, the average vacuum cleaner does not.
  • Adjustable tube height
    Adjustable tube height
    yes
    â–² Better than 53% of models
    This vacuum cleaner has adjustable tube height, the average vacuum cleaner does not.
  • 821 mm shorter body
    Height
    279 mm
    â–² Better than 89% of models
    Market range: <290 mm – >1.2k mm
    This vacuum cleaner is shorter than the average vacuum cleaner (279 mm vs 1100 mm).
    279 mm vs 1,100 mm
  • 38.27 L/s higher airflow
    Airflow
    66.07 L/s
    ★ Better than 93% of models
    Market range: <16.5 L/s – >52 L/s
    This vacuum cleaner delivers higher airflow than the average vacuum cleaner (66.1 L/s vs 27.8 L/s).
    66.07 L/s vs 27.8 L/s
  • Less operating noise
    Noise level (Min-Max)
    62-67 dB
    ★ Better than 92% of models
    Market range: <65 dB – >83 dB
    This vacuum cleaner is quieter than the average vacuum cleaner (62-67 dB vs 77-77 dB).
    62-67 dB vs 77-77 dB
  • 4 more power levels
    Number of speeds
    6
    ★ Better than 97% of models
    Market range: <1 – >4
    This vacuum cleaner offers more speed levels than the average vacuum cleaner (6 vs 2).
    6 vs 2
  • 45 mm wider cleaning path
    Cleaning path width
    305 mm
    â–² Better than 89% of models
    Market range: <230 mm – >309 mm
    This vacuum cleaner has a wider cleaning path than the average vacuum cleaner (305 mm vs 260 mm).
    305 mm vs 260 mm
  • 1.47 kPa higher suction pressure
    Suction power (kPa)
    21.47 kPa
    â–² Better than 65% of models
    Market range: <11 kPa – >30 kPa
    This vacuum cleaner has higher suction pressure than the average vacuum cleaner (21.5 kPa vs 20 kPa).
    21.47 kPa vs 20 kPa
  • 3.5 L larger dust container
    Capacity
    4.5 L
    ★ Better than 93% of models
    Market range: <0.44 L – >4 L
    This vacuum cleaner has a larger dust capacity than the average vacuum cleaner (4.5 L vs 1 L).
    4.5 L vs 1 L
  • Includes full bin indicator
    Full bin indicator
    yes
    â–² Better than 73% of models
    This vacuum cleaner includes a full bin indicator, the average vacuum cleaner does not.
  • Includes parquet brush
    Parquet brush
    yes
    â–² Better than 77% of models
    This vacuum cleaner includes a parquet brush, the average vacuum cleaner does not.
  • Adjustable tube height
    Adjustable tube height
    yes
    â–² Better than 53% of models
    This vacuum cleaner has adjustable tube height, the average vacuum cleaner does not.
  • 821 mm shorter body
    Height
    279 mm
    â–² Better than 89% of models
    Market range: <290 mm – >1.2k mm
    This vacuum cleaner is shorter than the average vacuum cleaner (279 mm vs 1100 mm).
    279 mm vs 1,100 mm
  • 44 mm shallower body
    Depth
    221 mm
    â–² Better than 71% of models
    Market range: <170 mm – >440 mm
    This vacuum cleaner is less deep than the average vacuum cleaner (221 mm vs 265 mm).
    221 mm vs 265 mm
  • No handheld conversion
    2-in-1 design
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 53% of models
    This vacuum cleaner does not have a 2-in-1 design, the average vacuum cleaner does.
  • Not allergy-friendly
    Suitable for allergy sufferers
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 83% of models
    This vacuum cleaner is not suitable for allergy sufferers, the average vacuum cleaner is.
  • 60.2% higher weight
    Weight
    5.8 kg
    â–¼ Worse than 78% of models
    Market range: <2.15 kg – >7.1 kg
    This vacuum cleaner is heavier than the average vacuum cleaner (5.8 kg vs 3.62 kg).
    5.8 kg vs 3.62 kg
  • No bagless design
    Bagless
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 79% of models
    This vacuum cleaner does not use a bagless design, the average vacuum cleaner does.
  • No washable filter
    Washable filter
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 85% of models
    This vacuum cleaner does not include a washable filter, the average vacuum cleaner does.
  • No cyclonic technology
    Cyclonic technology
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 71% of models
    This vacuum cleaner does not use cyclonic technology, the average vacuum cleaner does.
  • 600 W higher power consumption
    Power consumption
    1,200 W
    â–¼ Worse than 97% of models
    Market range: <165 W – >899 W
    This vacuum cleaner draws more power than the average vacuum cleaner (1200 W vs 600 W).
    1,200 W vs 600 W
  • Lower filter class
    Filter class
    airclean
    â–¼ Worse than 87% of models
    This vacuum cleaner uses a lower filter class than the average vacuum cleaner (airclean vs hepa).
    airclean vs hepa
  • 10.5% worse value for money
    Miele Classic C1 Turbo Team offers worse value for money than the average vacuum cleaner (6.92 vs 7.6).
    6.92 vs 7.65
  • 2.6x more expensive
    Miele Classic C1 Turbo Team is more expensive than the average vacuum cleaner (£390 vs £150).
    £390 vs £150
  • No cyclonic technology
    Cyclonic technology
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 71% of models
    This vacuum cleaner does not use cyclonic technology, the average vacuum cleaner does.
  • 600 W higher power consumption
    Power consumption
    1,200 W
    â–¼ Worse than 97% of models
    Market range: <165 W – >899 W
    This vacuum cleaner draws more power than the average vacuum cleaner (1200 W vs 600 W).
    1,200 W vs 600 W
  • 1 m shorter power cord
    Power cord length
    5.5 m
    â–¼ Worse than 74% of models
    Market range: <5 m – >9.3 m
    This vacuum cleaner has a shorter power cord than the average vacuum cleaner (5.5 m vs 6.5 m).
    5.5 m vs 6.5 m
  • Not allergy-friendly
    Suitable for allergy sufferers
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 83% of models
    This vacuum cleaner is not suitable for allergy sufferers, the average vacuum cleaner is.
  • No bagless design
    Bagless
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 79% of models
    This vacuum cleaner does not use a bagless design, the average vacuum cleaner does.
  • No washable filter
    Washable filter
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 85% of models
    This vacuum cleaner does not include a washable filter, the average vacuum cleaner does.
  • Lower filter class
    Filter class
    airclean
    â–¼ Worse than 87% of models
    This vacuum cleaner uses a lower filter class than the average vacuum cleaner (airclean vs hepa).
    airclean vs hepa
  • 0.05 % lower filtration efficiency
    Minimum overall efficiency
    99.9 %
    â–¼ Worse than 68% of models
    Market range: <95 % – >99.99 %
    This vacuum cleaner has lower filtration efficiency than the average vacuum cleaner (99.9 % vs 99.95 %).
    99.9 % vs 99.95 %
  • No handheld conversion
    2-in-1 design
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 53% of models
    This vacuum cleaner does not have a 2-in-1 design, the average vacuum cleaner does.
  • 60.2% higher weight
    Weight
    5.8 kg
    â–¼ Worse than 78% of models
    Market range: <2.15 kg – >7.1 kg
    This vacuum cleaner is heavier than the average vacuum cleaner (5.8 kg vs 3.62 kg).
    5.8 kg vs 3.62 kg
  • Older release date
    Release date
    2019
    â–¼ Worse than 67% of models
    Market range: <2k – >2k
    This vacuum cleaner has an older release date than the average vacuum cleaner (2019 vs 2021).
    2019 vs 2021

Graphic comparison of Miele Classic C1 Turbo Team and other vacuum cleaners

No results found

Third-party reviews

What customers like about Miele Classic C1 Turbo Team?

  • Powerful suction performance across multiple surface types
  • Excellent maneuverability due to its compact and lightweight canister design
  • High build quality and long-term durability typical of German engineering
  • Effective air filtration system that captures 99.9% of dust and allergens
  • Quiet motor operation even at higher suction settings
  • Included Turbo brush is highly effective for removing pet hair on low-to-medium pile rugs

What customers dislike about Miele Classic C1 Turbo Team?

  • Relatively short power cord requires frequent outlet changes in larger homes
  • Ongoing costs for proprietary replacement bags and filters can be high
  • Turbine-driven brush head may struggle on thick, high-pile, or plush carpeting
  • Higher initial purchase price compared to many other canister models
  • HEPA filter often needs to be purchased separately for maximum air purification

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

R
realhomes.com
19/10/2020
Summary of the review
Miele Classic C1 Turbo Team PowerLine vacuum review
R
rtings.com
22/07/2022
Summary of the review
Miele Classic C1 Vacuum Review - RTINGS.com

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

Compare Miele Classic C1 Turbo Team with other vacuum cleaners

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)