OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS
Scored using Tablets Methodology v3.0
Tablets Methodology v3.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontum Tablets Methodology v3.0: the technical score from the specifications is the base, and independent expert and video reviews (up to ±0.5 points), owner opinions (up to ±0.3) and best-of lists (up to +0.3) move it up or down.
Explore Tablets Methodology v3.0

Vivo iQOO Pad 2 WiFi (8GB + 256GB) review: 168 specs compared

Avg. price:~£320RAM capacity:8 GBInternal storage:256 GBScreen size:12.1 inchesChipset:Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3

Vivo iQOO Pad 2 WiFi (8GB + 256GB) Review: Compare 168 technical specifications to see how this product ranks in the Tablets category and whether it is worth buying.

7.7/10

Overall score

Score
7.7/ 10
✕
What it is
Our main score for this model, 1–10. It combines specs, best-of lists, expert reviews and owners.
How we count it
Parts: Technical score 35%, List score 30%, Reviews score 25%, Sentiment score 10%
Marks: Each part gets a mark out of 10. For reviews, lists and owners, a typical model in this category gets about 8 and the best one gets 10.
No data yet: A part with no data shows "?". It counts as the mark of a weaker model in this category (4 in 5 models with data score higher). This way, models with reviews, lists and owners usually come out ahead.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 78% of models
Score components

35%

8.3

Technical score

30%

?

List scoreNot enough data yet, so we use 7.5, the mark of a weaker model in this category

25%

?

Reviews scoreNot enough data yet, so we use 7.4, the mark of a weaker model in this category

10%

?

Sentiment scoreNot enough data yet, so we use 6.9, the mark of a weaker model in this category

â–²Better than 78% of tablets
8.0

Value for money

Value for money
8.0/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the tablet's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a tablet with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 80% of models
Score components

70%

7.7

Overall score

30%

8.8

Price

â–²Better than 80%
8.3

Technical score

Technical score
8.3/ 10
✕
What it is
How good the specs are compared with the other models in this category, 1–10.
How we count it
Areas: We rate the specs in each area against the other models in this category.
Weighting: The areas that matter most to buyers count more. The shares are shown under Score components.
Share: The technical score is 35% of the overall score.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 88% of models
Score components

22%

9.7

Performance

20%

8.1

Display

16%

7.1

Camera

14%

8.6

Battery

12%

7.4

Connectivity

8%

9.1

Software

5%

6.4

Design

3%

8.7

Audio

â–²Better than 88%
?

Reviews score

Reviews score
✕
What it is
Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
How we count it
Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves. Big test sites count more, short reviews half as much as full tests. A video review counts half.
Score: The average grade is 80% of the review mark; the number of reviews is the other 20% (1 review = 5, the typical number in this category = 8, the most-reviewed model = 10).
Enough data: With few reviews, the average grade is pulled toward the typical grade of this category. No reviews yet: 7.4 for now.
Share: Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Grades by review (0)
We have not found an independent test of this model yet. Until we do, its review part counts as 7.4.
User ratings collected online are not part of this score.
No expert tests yet
?

List score

List score
7.5/ 10
✕
What it is
How often independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers put this model in their best-of lists for this category.
How we count it
Points: The model in the most lists of this category gets 10; the others get 8 to 10 in proportion. In no list yet: 7.5. Lists count 30% of the overall score.
Enough data: Every list counts, even a single one. With fewer than 5 best-of lists in the category, this part is left out.
Lists with this model (0)
Not in any best-of list yet, so this part counts as 7.5. Models in a list get 8 to 10.
Not in any best-of list yet
  • No image
No image
Where to buy
    N/A~ £320
Best rankings
Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Other versions:
8GB + 256GB8GB + 128GB12GB + 256GB12GB + 512GB
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of tablet Vivo iQOO Pad 2 WiFi (8GB + 256GB)

Technical score
Technical score
8.3/ 10
✕
What it is
How good the specs are compared with the other models in this category, 1–10.
How we count it
Areas: We rate the specs in each area against the other models in this category.
Weighting: The areas that matter most to buyers count more. The shares are shown under Score components.
Share: The technical score is 35% of the overall score.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 88% of models
Score components:

22%

9.7

Performance

20%

8.1

Display

16%

7.1

Camera

14%

8.6

Battery

12%

7.4

Connectivity

8%

9.1

Software

5%

6.4

Design

3%

8.7

Audio

8.3
Reviews score
7.4
List score
?
Value for money
Value for money
8.0/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the tablet's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a tablet with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 80% of models
Score components:

70%

7.7

Overall score

30%

8.8

Price

8.0
RAM capacity
8 GB
Market range: <1 GB – >8 GB
This tablet has 8 GB of RAM, which is more than 72.1% of tablets and equal to 17.9% of tablets.
Process node
4 nm
Market range: <4 nm – >40 nm
This tablet is built on a 4 nm process, which is smaller than 88.1% of tablets and equal to 8.5% of tablets.
Internal storage
256 GB
Market range: <16 GB – >256 GB
This tablet has 256 GB of internal storage, which is more than 76.4% of tablets and equal to 15.8% of tablets.
Geekbench 6 single-core score
2019 points
Market range: <233 points – >2.3k points
This tablet scores 2019 points in single-core tests, which is higher than 82.4% of tablets and equal to 0.9% of tablets.
Chipset
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3
This tablet runs on Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, which is more advanced than 95.6% of tablets and equal to 0.9% of tablets.
Show more
Screen resolution
2800×1968
This tablet has a 2800×1968 screen, which is sharper than 92.6% of tablets and equal to 0.9% of tablets.
Refresh rate
144 Hz
Market range: <60 Hz – >120 Hz
This tablet has a 144 Hz screen, which is smoother than 91.2% of tablets and equal to 7.4% of tablets.
Display type
LCD
This tablet uses a LCD display type. 83.1% of tablets use this display technology.
Pixel density
283 ppi
Market range: <149 ppi – >291 ppi
This tablet has a pixel density of 283 ppi, which is higher than 84.4% of tablets and equal to 3% of tablets.
Display glass type
?
Show more
Optical image stabilization
no
This tablet does not support optical stabilisation. 0.4% of tablets offer this.
Main camera megapixels
8 MP
Market range: <3.15 MP – >13 MP
This tablet has a rear camera with 8 MP resolution, which is higher than 36.4% of tablets and equal to 31.9% of tablets.
Front camera megapixels
5 MP
Market range: <1.2 MP – >9 MP
This tablet has a front camera with 5 MP resolution, which is higher than 48.6% of tablets and equal to 19.7% of tablets.
Main camera aperture
f/2.0
This tablet has a main camera aperture of f/2.0, which is wider than 57.4% of tablets and equal to 24.7% of tablets.
Optical zoom
1xxx
This tablet has 1xx optical zoom, which is stronger than 18.2% of tablets and equal to 80.9% of tablets.
Show more
Battery capacity
10,000 mAh
Market range: <4k mAh – >10.1k mAh
This tablet has 10,000 mAh battery capacity, which is larger than 87.5% of tablets and equal to 2.3% of tablets.
Charging speed
44 W
Market range: <10 W – >45 W
This tablet charges at 44 W, which is faster than 82.5% of tablets and equal to 1.2% of tablets.
Battery life
11.5 hours
Market range: <7 hours – >16 hours
This tablet has a battery life of 11.5 hours, which is longer than that of 64.7% of tablets and equal to that of 0.8% of tablets.
Wireless charging
no
This tablet does not support wireless charging. 1.5% of tablets offer this.
Fast charging
yes
This tablet supports fast charging. 43.2% of tablets offer this.
Show more
LTE support
no
This tablet does not have built-in LTE. 42.9% of tablets offer this.
Wi-Fi connectivity
yes
This tablet connects to Wi-Fi. 0.2% of tablets offer this.
GPS
yes
This tablet has built-in GPS. 17.1% of tablets offer this.
5G connectivity
no
This tablet does not support 5G. 8.1% of tablets offer this.
NFC
no
This tablet does not include NFC. 10.8% of tablets offer this.
Show more
Operating system
Android
This tablet uses the Android operating system, which is more advanced than the one used by 23.2%.
Update support duration
medium
This tablet offers medium update support, which is longer than the support period of 47.6% of tablets and equal to that of 32.4% of tablets.
Direct OS updates
yes
This tablet supports direct OS updates. 20.3% of tablets offer this.
On-device AI
yes
This tablet supports on-device AI. 71.7% of tablets support this capability.
App tracking protection
yes
This tablet supports app tracking protection. 71.6% of tablets offer this.
Show more
IP rating
not rated
This tablet's IP rating is not rated, which is less protected than 16.5% of tablets and the same as 83.6% of tablets.
Weight
589 g
Market range: <315 g – >730 g
This tablet weighs 589 g, which is heavier than 73.5% of tablets and equal to 0.4% of tablets.
Backlit keyboard
no
This tablet does not support a backlit keyboard. 9.7% of tablets support backlit keyboards.
Keyboard accessory
yes
This tablet supports a keyboard accessory. 15.8% of tablets support this option.
Pen latency
?
Show more
Number of microphones
?
aptX Adaptive
yes
This tablet supports aptX Adaptive. 93.2% of tablets offer this.
Dolby Atmos support
yes
This tablet supports Dolby Atmos. 68.7% of tablets support Dolby Atmos.
N. of speakers
6
Market range: <2 – >4
This tablet includes 6 speakers, which is more than in 93.7% of tablets and equal to the number in 2.6% of tablets.
FM radio
no
This tablet does not include an FM radio. 19% of tablets offer this.
Show more

Vivo iQOO Pad 2 WiFi (8GB + 256GB) vs the average tablet

246810TotalPerformanceDisplayCameraBatteryConnectivitySoftwareDesignAudio
  • More advanced chipset
    This tablet has a more advanced chipset than the average tablet (Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 vs MediaTek MT8169A).
    Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 vs MediaTek MT8169A
  • 2.4x faster refresh rate
    This tablet has a faster refresh rate than the average tablet (144 Hz vs 60 Hz). The average tablet has a 60 Hz refresh rate.
    144 Hz vs 60 Hz
  • 4x more internal storage
    This tablet has more internal storage than the average tablet (256 GB vs 64 GB). The average tablet has 64 GB of internal storage.
    256 GB vs 64 GB
  • Sharper display
    This tablet has a sharper screen than the average tablet (2800×1968 vs 1920×1200).
    2,800×1968 vs 1920×1,200
  • More advanced graphics
    This tablet has more advanced graphics than the average tablet (Adreno 735 vs Mali-G51).
    Adreno 735 vs Mali-G51
  • 50% higher CPU speed
    This tablet has a higher CPU speed than the average tablet (3 GHz vs 2 GHz). The average tablet has CPU speed of 2 GHz.
    3 GHz vs 2 GHz
  • Faster storage type
    This tablet uses UFS storage, while the average tablet uses eMMC. Storage technology still varies widely across tablets.
    UFS vs eMMC
  • 2.95x higher multi-core score
    This tablet has a higher multi-core score than the average tablet (5,570 points vs 1,891 points). The average tablet scores 1,891 points in multi-core tests.
    5,570 points vs 1,891 points
  • 6.5% better value for money
    Vivo iQOO Pad 2 WiFi (8GB + 256GB) has better value for money than the average tablet (8.04 vs 7.6).
    8.04 vs 7.55
  • More advanced chipset
    This tablet has a more advanced chipset than the average tablet (Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 vs MediaTek MT8169A).
    Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 vs MediaTek MT8169A
  • 4x more internal storage
    This tablet has more internal storage than the average tablet (256 GB vs 64 GB). The average tablet has 64 GB of internal storage.
    256 GB vs 64 GB
  • More advanced graphics
    This tablet has more advanced graphics than the average tablet (Adreno 735 vs Mali-G51).
    Adreno 735 vs Mali-G51
  • 50% higher CPU speed
    This tablet has a higher CPU speed than the average tablet (3 GHz vs 2 GHz). The average tablet has CPU speed of 2 GHz.
    3 GHz vs 2 GHz
  • Faster storage type
    This tablet uses UFS storage, while the average tablet uses eMMC. Storage technology still varies widely across tablets.
    UFS vs eMMC
  • 2.95x higher multi-core score
    This tablet has a higher multi-core score than the average tablet (5,570 points vs 1,891 points). The average tablet scores 1,891 points in multi-core tests.
    5,570 points vs 1,891 points
  • 4 GB more RAM
    This tablet has more RAM than the average tablet (8 GB vs 4 GB). The average tablet has 4 GB of RAM.
    8 GB vs 4 GB
  • 2.77x higher single-core score
    This tablet has a higher single-core score than the average tablet (2019 points vs 729 points). The average tablet scores 729 points in single-core tests.
    2,019 points vs 729 points
  • More advanced memory type
    This tablet uses more advanced memory than the average tablet (LPDDR5X vs LPDDR3).
    LPDDR5X vs LPDDR3
  • 4.51x more memory bandwidth
    This tablet has more memory bandwidth than the average tablet (67.2 GB/s vs 14.9 GB/s). The average tablet has 14.9 GB/s of memory bandwidth.
    67.2 GB/s vs 14.9 GB/s
  • 6,134 MHz faster RAM speed
    This tablet has a higher RAM speed than the average tablet (8,000 MHz vs 1,866 MHz). The average tablet has RAM speed of 1,866 MHz.
    8,000 MHz vs 1,866 MHz
  • 71.4% smaller process node
    This tablet has a smaller process node than the average tablet (4 nm vs 14 nm). The average tablet is built on 14 nm.
    4 nm vs 14 nm
  • 69.2% faster GPU clock
    This tablet runs its GPU faster than the average tablet (1,100 MHz vs 650 MHz). The average tablet runs its GPU at 650 MHz.
    1,100 MHz vs 650 MHz
  • Includes neural engine
    This tablet includes a neural engine, the average tablet does not. 25.6% of tablets include a neural engine.
  • 5 years newer
    This tablet was released more recently than the average tablet (2024 vs 2019). The average tablet was released in 2019.
    May 2024
    2024 vs 2019
  • 2.4x faster refresh rate
    This tablet has a faster refresh rate than the average tablet (144 Hz vs 60 Hz). The average tablet has a 60 Hz refresh rate.
    144 Hz vs 60 Hz
  • Sharper display
    This tablet has a sharper screen than the average tablet (2800×1968 vs 1920×1200).
    2,800×1968 vs 1920×1,200
  • 2 inches larger screen
    This tablet has a larger screen than the average tablet (12.1 inches vs 10.1 inches). The average tablet measures 10.1 inches.
    12.1 inches vs 10.1 inches
  • Supports adaptive refresh rate
    This tablet has adaptive refresh rate, the average tablet does not. 17.7% of tablets support adaptive refresh rate.
  • Wider color gamut
    This tablet supports a wider color gamut than the average tablet (DCI-P3 vs sRGB). The average tablet covers sRGB color gamut.
    DCI-P3 vs sRGB
  • 28.1% sharper screen detail
    This tablet has sharper screen detail than the average tablet (283 ppi vs 221 ppi). The average tablet has a pixel density of 221 ppi.
    283 ppi vs 221 ppi
  • 99 nits brighter screen
    This tablet is brighter than the average tablet (500 nits vs 401 nits). The average tablet reaches 401 nits.
    500 nits vs 401 nits
  • Supports HDR10
    This tablet supports HDR10, while the average tablet does not. 21.7% of tablets support HDR10.
  • 2x faster touch response
    This tablet samples touch faster than the average tablet (240 Hz vs 120 Hz). The average tablet samples touch at 120 Hz.
    240 Hz vs 120 Hz
  • Supports manual shutter speed
    This tablet supports manual shutter speed, while the average tablet does not. 21.8% of tablets support manual shutter speed.
  • Supports manual ISO
    This tablet supports manual ISO, while the average tablet does not. 45.9% of tablets support manual ISO.
  • Wider main camera aperture
    This tablet has a wider main camera aperture than the average tablet (f/2 vs f/2.2). The average tablet's main camera aperture is f/2.2.
    f/2.0 vs f/2.2
  • Built-in camera flash
    This tablet has a camera flash, while the average tablet does not. 45.5% of tablets have one.
  • 51.5% larger battery capacity
    This tablet has a larger battery capacity than the average tablet (10,000 mAh vs 6,600 mAh). The average tablet offers 6,600 mAh of battery capacity.
    10,000 mAh vs 6,600 mAh
  • 2.44x faster charging
    This tablet charges faster than the average tablet (44 W vs 18 W). The average tablet charges at 18 W.
    44 W vs 18 W
  • Monitors battery health
    This tablet monitors battery health, while the average tablet does not. 36.7% of tablets monitor battery health.
  • 1.5 hours longer battery life
    This tablet offers longer battery life than the average tablet (11.5 hours vs 10 hours). The average tablet offers 10 hours of battery life.
    11.5 hours vs 10 hours
  • Supports DisplayPort over USB-C
    This tablet supports DisplayPort over USB-C, the average tablet does not. 21.3% of tablets support DisplayPort over USB-C.
  • Newer Bluetooth version
    This tablet has a newer Bluetooth version than the average tablet (5.4 vs 5).
    5.4 vs 5
  • Newer Wi-Fi standard
    This tablet has a newer Wi-Fi standard than the average tablet (Wi-Fi 6 (802.11ax) vs Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac)).
    Wi-Fi 6 (802.11ax) vs Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac)
  • Faster USB ports
    This tablet has faster USB ports than the average tablet (USB 3.2 Gen 1 vs USB 2).
    USB 3.2 Gen 1 vs USB 2.0
  • Supports HDMI output
    This tablet supports HDMI output, while the average tablet does not. 49.8% of tablets offer this.
    via USB-C DisplayPort Alt Mode adapter
  • Includes on-device AI
    This tablet includes on-device AI, the average tablet does not. 28.3% of tablets include on-device AI.
  • Supports live text recognition
    This tablet supports live text recognition, while the average tablet does not. 35.1% of tablets offer this.
  • Supports app tracking protection
    This tablet supports app tracking protection, while the average tablet does not. 28.4% of tablets offer this.
  • Supports dynamic themes
    This tablet supports dynamic themes, while the average tablet does not. 29.5% of tablets offer this.
  • Supports extra dim mode
    This tablet supports extra dim mode, while the average tablet does not. 35.9% of tablets offer this.
  • Includes clipboard warnings
    This tablet has clipboard warnings, the average tablet does not. 40.3% of tablets include clipboard warnings.
  • Supports drawing
    This tablet is suitable for drawing, while the average tablet is not. 40% of tablets are suitable for drawing.
  • Supports stylus tilt
    This tablet supports stylus tilt, the average tablet does not. 33.5% of tablets support stylus tilt.
  • 1.4 mm thinner
    This tablet is thinner than the average tablet (6.6 mm vs 8 mm). The average tablet is 8 mm thick.
    6.6 mm vs 8 mm
  • 4 more speakers
    This tablet has more speakers than the average tablet (6 vs 2). The average tablet has 2 speakers.
    6 vs 2
  • Supports Dolby Atmos
    This tablet supports Dolby Atmos, the average tablet does not. 31.3% of tablets support Dolby Atmos.
  • Supports LDAC
    This tablet supports LDAC, the average tablet does not. 25.3% of tablets support LDAC.
  • Supports Bluetooth LE Audio
    This tablet supports Bluetooth LE Audio, the average tablet does not. 11.4% of tablets support Bluetooth LE Audio.
  • Supports aptX Adaptive
    This tablet supports aptX Adaptive, while the average tablet does not. 6.8% of tablets offer this.
  • Supports aptX Lossless
    This tablet supports aptX Lossless, while the average tablet does not. 1.7% of tablets offer this.
  • Supports aptX Low Latency
    This tablet supports aptX Low Latency, the average tablet does not. 2.6% of tablets support aptX Low Latency.
  • Inferior display type
    This tablet has an inferior display type compared to the average tablet (LCD vs IPS LCD). 0.00% of tablets use the superior display type.
    LCD vs IPS LCD
  • No burst mode
    This tablet does not support burst mode, the average tablet does. 60.6% of tablets support burst mode.
  • No headphone jack
    This tablet does not include a 3.5 mm headphone jack, while the average tablet does. 72.8% of tablets offer this.
  • No panorama mode
    This tablet does not support panorama mode, while the average tablet does. 78.6% of tablets support panorama mode.
  • 20.2% heavier
    This tablet is heavier than the average tablet (589 g vs 490 g). The average tablet weighs 490 g.
    589 g vs 490 g
  • 91.1 mm wider
    This tablet is wider than the average tablet (266.4 mm vs 175.3 mm). The average tablet is 175.3 mm wide.
    266.4 mm vs 175.3 mm
  • No Ethernet support
    This tablet does not have Ethernet support, the average tablet does. 76.5% of tablets support Ethernet.
    via keyboard dock or dock adapter
  • 66.4 mm taller
    This tablet is taller than the average tablet (266.4 mm vs 200 mm). The average tablet is 200 mm tall.
    266.4 mm vs 200 mm
  • Inferior display type
    This tablet has an inferior display type compared to the average tablet (LCD vs IPS LCD). 0.00% of tablets use the superior display type.
    LCD vs IPS LCD
  • Less vivid contrast
    This tablet has less contrast than the average tablet (1000:1 vs 1015:1). The average tablet has a contrast ratio of 1015:1.
    1,000:1 vs 1,015:1
  • No burst mode
    This tablet does not support burst mode, the average tablet does. 60.6% of tablets support burst mode.
  • No panorama mode
    This tablet does not support panorama mode, while the average tablet does. 78.6% of tablets support panorama mode.
  • No Ethernet support
    This tablet does not have Ethernet support, the average tablet does. 76.5% of tablets support Ethernet.
    via keyboard dock or dock adapter
  • 20.2% heavier
    This tablet is heavier than the average tablet (589 g vs 490 g). The average tablet weighs 490 g.
    589 g vs 490 g
  • 91.1 mm wider
    This tablet is wider than the average tablet (266.4 mm vs 175.3 mm). The average tablet is 175.3 mm wide.
    266.4 mm vs 175.3 mm
  • 66.4 mm taller
    This tablet is taller than the average tablet (266.4 mm vs 200 mm). The average tablet is 200 mm tall.
    266.4 mm vs 200 mm
  • No headphone jack
    This tablet does not include a 3.5 mm headphone jack, while the average tablet does. 72.8% of tablets offer this.

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

Not graded yet
Not graded yet
Not graded yet

Third-party reviews

What customers like about Vivo iQOO Pad 2 WiFi (8GB + 256GB)

  • High-performance Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 chipset provides smooth multitasking and stable frame rates in demanding games like Genshin Impact
  • Vibrant 12.1-inch 144Hz display with a 240Hz touch sampling rate offers a fluid visual experience for gaming and media
  • Robust 10,000mAh battery supports long usage sessions, coupled with 44W fast charging
  • Premium build featuring a slim 6.6mm profile and a durable metallic matte finish
  • Immersive six-speaker system with Hi-Res audio certification provides superior sound quality compared to standard tablets
  • Efficient thermal management with a 3D cooling system helps maintain performance during heavy workloads

What customers don't like about Vivo iQOO Pad 2 WiFi (8GB + 256GB)

  • Average camera setup (8MP rear/5MP front) is basic and lacks advanced features like 4K recording found in the Pro model
  • Software ecosystem occasionally lacks optimization for large-screen tablet layouts in third-party apps
  • Limited global availability as the device is primarily a China-exclusive release, which may affect local warranty and service
  • Inaccurate color reproduction reported by some users, with oversaturated tones in certain display modes

Verdict

The Vivo iQOO Pad 2 (8GB + 256GB) is a high-performance Android 14 tablet featuring a 12.1-inch IPS LCD with a 2.8K resolution (2800 x 1968), a fluid 144Hz refresh rate, and 600 nits peak brightness. It is powered by the flagship-tier Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 chipset, paired with 8GB of LPDDR5X RAM and 256GB of fast UFS 4.0 storage. Key characteristics include a slim 6.6mm aluminum body, a large 10,000mAh battery with 44W fast charging, and a six-speaker system for immersive audio. Main pros are its powerful gaming-ready processor, vibrant high-refresh-rate display, and generous battery life. Notable cons include the lack of a microSD card slot for expandable storage, no 3.5mm headphone jack, and the absence of a fingerprint sensor for biometric security.

Compare Vivo iQOO Pad 2 WiFi (8GB + 256GB) with other tablets

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Vivo iQOO Pad 2 WiFi (8GB + 256GB) and other tablets

No results found