OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS
Scored using Tablets Methodology v1.0
Tablets Methodology v1.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are evaluated mathematically under Frontumo Tablets Methodology v1.0 using verified laboratory benchmarks, technical specifications, and authentic consumer ratings with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Tablets Methodology v1.0

Teclast P80 4G (2GB + 16GB) Review | 168 Data compared

Avg. price:~£70RAM capacity:2 GBInternal storage:16 GBScreen size:8 inchesChipset:Allwinner A133

Teclast P80 4G (2GB + 16GB) Review: Compare 168 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Tablets category and whether it is worth buying.

5.0

Overall score

Score
5.0/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the smartphone's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best Tablets on the market.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 90% of models
Score components

90%

5.0

Technical score

10%

?

User score

â–¼Worse than 90% of tablets
5.0

Technical score

Technical score
5.0/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of the smartphone's technical performance, covering eight key areas: performance & hardware, software, camera, connectivity, display, battery, audio, and design.
When it matters
When you want to compare Tablets based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 86% of models
Score components

22%

4.3

Performance

20%

4.7

Display

16%

5.7

Camera

14%

2.2

Battery

12%

6.8

Connectivity

8%

7.3

Software & Features

5%

6.7

Design

3%

5.8

Audio & Multimedia

â–¼Worse than 86% of tablets
?

User score

User score
8.0/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the smartphone
When it matters
When you want to know how a smartphone handles daily tasks and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 63% of models
Score components

70%

?

User ratings

30%

?

Number of reviews

  • No image
No image

Best prices

    N/A~ £70

Best rankings

Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of tablet Teclast P80 4G (2GB + 16GB)

Technical score
Technical score
5.0/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of the smartphone's technical performance, covering eight key areas: performance & hardware, software, camera, connectivity, display, battery, audio, and design.
When it matters
When you want to compare Tablets based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 86% of models
Score components:

22%

4.3

Performance

20%

4.7

Display

16%

5.7

Camera

14%

2.2

Battery

12%

6.8

Connectivity

8%

7.3

Software & Features

5%

6.7

Design

3%

5.8

Audio & Multimedia

5.0
User score
User score
8.0/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the smartphone
When it matters
When you want to know how a smartphone handles daily tasks and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 63% of models
Score components

70%

?

User ratings

30%

?

Number of reviews

?
Popularity
Popularity
1.0/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the smartphone.
When it matters
When you prefer to purchase a product chosen and reviewed by many other consumers.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 99% of models
Popularity:
Teclast P80 4G (2GB + 16GB) has a popularity of 1 point, which is higher than 65.8% of Tablets.
1.0
Value for money
Value for money
6.5/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the smartphone's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a smartphone with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 78% of models
Score components:

60%

5.0

Overall score

40%

10

Price

6.5
RAM capacity
2 GB
RAM capacity
2 GB
â–¼ Worse than 61% of models
Market range: <2 GB – >12 GB
This tablet has a RAM capacity of 2 GB which is smaller than the RAM capacity of 60.9% of tablets and equal to that of 15.6% of tablets.
Process node
28 nm
Process node
28 nm
â–¼ Worse than 65% of models
Market range: <4 nm – >40 nm
This tablet is built on a 28 nm process node, which is larger than the node size used in 64.7% of tablets and equal to the node used in 17.8% of tablets.
Internal storage
16 GB
Internal storage
16 GB
â–¼ Worse than 79% of models
Market range: <0 GB – >250 GB
This tablet has an internal storage capacity of 16 GB which is smaller than the storage of 78.5% of tablets and equal to that of 15% of tablets.
Geekbench 6 single-core benchmark score
164 points
Geekbench 6 single-core benchmark score
164 points
â–¼ Worse than 97% of models
Market range: <233 points – >2.3k points
This tablet scored 164 points in Geekbench 6 (single-core) which is lower than the score of 97.1% of tablets and equal to the score of 0.6% of tablets.
Chipset
Allwinner A133
Chipset
Allwinner A133
â–¼ Worse than 99% of models
This tablet uses the Allwinner A133 chipset, which is less advanced than the chipsets in 98.9% of tablets and equal to those in 0.1% of tablets.
Show more
Screen resolution
1280×800
Screen resolution
1280×800
â–¼ Worse than 68% of models
This tablet has a screen resolution of 1280×800 which is lower than that of 68.1% of tablets and equal to that of 21.7% of tablets.
Refresh rate
60 Hz
Refresh rate
60 Hz
â–¼ Worse than 26% of models
Market range: <60 Hz – >120 Hz
This tablet supports a refresh rate of 60 Hz which is equal to that in 73.8% of tablets.
Display type
IPS LCD
Display type
IPS LCD
â–² Better than 17% of models
This tablet uses a IPS LCD display type. 17% of tablets use this display technology.
Pixel density
188 ppi
Pixel density
188 ppi
â–¼ Worse than 73% of models
Market range: <149 ppi – >291 ppi
This tablet has a pixel density of 188 ppi which is lower than that of 73.3% of tablets and equal to that of 0.6% of tablets.
Display glass type
Plastic
Display glass type
Plastic
â–¼ Worse than 98% of models
This tablet uses Plastic display glass which is weaker than that on 97.7% of tablets and equal to that on 2.3% of tablets.
Show more
Optical image stabilization
no
Optical image stabilization
no
Category Benchmark
This tablet does not support optical image stabilization. 0.4% of tablets include OIS.
Main camera megapixels
?
Front camera megapixels
0.3 MP
Front camera megapixels
0.3 MP
â–¼ Worse than 93% of models
Market range: <1.2 MP – >9 MP
This tablet has a front camera resolution of 0.3 MP which is lower than in 93% of tablets and equal to that in 7% of tablets.
Main camera aperture
f/2.8
Main camera aperture
f/2.8
â–¼ Worse than 90% of models
This tablet has a main camera aperture of f/2.8 which is narrower than that of 89.6% of tablets and equal to that of 3.1% of tablets.
Optical zoom
1xxx
Optical zoom
1xx
â–² Better than 18% of models
This tablet supports 1xx optical zoom which is higher than in 18.4% of tablets and equal to that in 80.7% of tablets.
Show more
Battery capacity
4,000 mAh
Battery capacity
4,000 mAh
â–¼ Worse than 85% of models
Market range: <4k mAh – >10.1k mAh
This tablet has a battery capacity of 4,000 mAh which is smaller than the batteries in 84.6% of tablets and equal to those in 4.5% of tablets.
Charging speed
10 W
Charging speed
10 W
â–¼ Worse than 61% of models
Market range: <10 W – >60 W
This tablet supports charging speeds of 10 W which is slower than in 61% of tablets and equal to speeds in 33.2% of tablets.
Battery life
6 hours
Battery life
6 hours
â–¼ Worse than 92% of models
Market range: <6 hours – >16 hours
This tablet has a battery life of 6 hours, which is shorter than that of 92% of tablets and equal to that of 2.6% of tablets.
Wireless charging
no
Wireless charging
no
â–¼ Worse than 2% of models
This tablet does not support wireless charging. 1.5% of tablets support wireless charging.
Fast charging
no
Fast charging
no
â–¼ Worse than 50% of models
This tablet does not support fast charging. 49.7% of tablets support fast charging.
Show more
LTE support
no
LTE support
no
â–¼ Worse than 63% of models
This tablet does not support LTE. 63.3% of tablets include LTE connectivity.
Wi-Fi connectivity
yes
Wi-Fi connectivity
yes
Category Benchmark
This tablet supports Wi-Fi connectivity. 0.2% of tablets offer Wi-Fi support.
GPS
yes
GPS
yes
â–² Better than 17% of models
This tablet supports GPS. 17.3% of tablets include GPS functionality.
5G connectivity
no
5G connectivity
no
â–¼ Worse than 11% of models
This tablet does not support 5G connectivity. 11.1% of tablets support 5G.
NFC
no
NFC
no
â–¼ Worse than 11% of models
This tablet does not support NFC. 10.9% of tablets support NFC.
Show more
Operating system
Android
Operating system
Android
â–² Better than 23% of models
This tablet uses the Android operating system, which is more advanced than the one used by 23.3%.
Update support duration
short
Update support duration
short
â–¼ Worse than 53% of models
This tablet offers short update support, which is shorter than the support period of 52.7% of tablets and equal to that of 47.3% of tablets.
Direct OS updates
yes
Direct OS updates
yes
â–² Better than 20% of models
This tablet receives direct OS updates. 20.3% of tablets receive direct updates.
On-device AI
no
On-device AI
no
â–¼ Worse than 28% of models
This tablet does not support on-device AI. 28.3% of tablets support this capability.
App tracking protection
no
App tracking protection
no
â–¼ Worse than 28% of models
This tablet does not include app tracking protection. 28.3% of tablets include app tracking protection.
Show more
IP rating
not rated
IP rating
not rated
â–¼ Worse than 16% of models
This tablet has an IP rating of not rated which is lower than that of 16.3% of tablets and equal to that of 83.7% of tablets.
Weight
310 g
Weight
310 g
★ Better than 90% of models
Market range: <315 g – >730 g
This tablet weighs 310 g which is lighter than 90.4% of tablets and equal to the weight of 1.7% of tablets.
Backlit keyboard
no
Backlit keyboard
no
â–¼ Worse than 10% of models
This tablet does not support a backlit keyboard. 9.8% of tablets support backlit keyboards.
Keyboard accessory
yes
Keyboard accessory
yes
â–² Better than 16% of models
This tablet supports a keyboard accessory. 15.8% of tablets support this option.
Pen latency
N/A
Show more
Number of microphones
?
aptX Adaptive
no
aptX Adaptive
no
â–¼ Worse than 7% of models
This tablet does not support aptX Adaptive. 6.9% of tablets offer this codec.
Dolby Atmos support
?
N. of speakers
1
N. of speakers
1
â–¼ Worse than 90% of models
Market range: <1 – >6
This tablet includes 1 speakers, which is fewer than in 90.2% of tablets and equal to the number in 9.6% of tablets.
FM radio
yes
FM radio
yes
â–² Better than 81% of models
This tablet includes an FM radio. 81.1% of tablets offer FM radio functionality.
Show more

Teclast P80 4G (2GB + 16GB) vs the average tablet

246810TotalPerformanceDisplayCameraBatteryConnectivitySoftware & FeaturesDesignAudio & Multimedia
  • 36.7% lighter
    Weight
    310 g
    ★ Better than 90% of models
    Market range: <315 g – >730 g
    This tablet is lighter than the average tablet (310 g vs 490 g). The average tablet weighs 490 g.
    310 g vs 490 g
  • Supports LDAC
    LDAC support
    yes
    â–² Better than 75% of models
    This tablet supports LDAC, the average tablet does not. 25.2% of tablets support LDAC.
  • 54.3 mm narrower
    Width
    121 mm
    ★ Better than 93% of models
    Market range: <123.8 mm – >274 mm
    This tablet is narrower than the average tablet (121 mm vs 175.3 mm). The average tablet is 175.3 mm wide.
    121 mm vs 175.3 mm
  • 3.71x cheaper
    Teclast P80 4G (2GB + 16GB) is cheaper than the average tablet (£70 vs £260).
    £70 vs £260
  • 2x higher touch sampling rate
    Touch sampling rate
    240 Hz
    â–² Better than 74% of models
    Market range: <60 Hz – >300 Hz
    This tablet has a higher touch sampling rate than the average tablet (240 Hz vs 120 Hz). The average tablet has touch sampling rate of 120 Hz.
    240 Hz vs 120 Hz
  • Newer DDR memory version
    DDR memory version
    DDR3
    â–¼ Worse than 54% of models
    This tablet supports a newer DDR version than the average tablet (DDR3 vs LPDDR3). The average DDR version is LPDDR3.
    DDR3 vs LPDDR3
  • 3.71x cheaper
    Teclast P80 4G (2GB + 16GB) is cheaper than the average tablet (£70 vs £260).
    £70 vs £260
  • Newer DDR memory version
    DDR memory version
    DDR3
    â–¼ Worse than 54% of models
    This tablet supports a newer DDR version than the average tablet (DDR3 vs LPDDR3). The average DDR version is LPDDR3.
    DDR3 vs LPDDR3
  • 2x higher touch sampling rate
    Touch sampling rate
    240 Hz
    â–² Better than 74% of models
    Market range: <60 Hz – >300 Hz
    This tablet has a higher touch sampling rate than the average tablet (240 Hz vs 120 Hz). The average tablet has touch sampling rate of 120 Hz.
    240 Hz vs 120 Hz
  • 36.7% lighter
    Weight
    310 g
    ★ Better than 90% of models
    Market range: <315 g – >730 g
    This tablet is lighter than the average tablet (310 g vs 490 g). The average tablet weighs 490 g.
    310 g vs 490 g
  • 54.3 mm narrower
    Width
    121 mm
    ★ Better than 93% of models
    Market range: <123.8 mm – >274 mm
    This tablet is narrower than the average tablet (121 mm vs 175.3 mm). The average tablet is 175.3 mm wide.
    121 mm vs 175.3 mm
  • Supports LDAC
    LDAC support
    yes
    â–² Better than 75% of models
    This tablet supports LDAC, the average tablet does not. 25.2% of tablets support LDAC.
  • 4.7 MP lower front camera megapixels
    Front camera megapixels
    0.3 MP
    â–¼ Worse than 93% of models
    Market range: <1.2 MP – >9 MP
    This tablet has less front camera megapixels than the average tablet (0.3 MP vs 5 MP). The average tablet has 5 MP front camera resolution.
    0.3 MP vs 5 MP
  • 4 hours shorter battery life
    Battery life
    6 hours
    â–¼ Worse than 92% of models
    Market range: <6 hours – >16 hours
    This tablet offers shorter battery life than the average tablet (6 hours vs 10 hours). The average tablet offers 10 hours of battery life.
    6 hours vs 10 hours
  • Shorter update support
    Update support duration
    short
    â–¼ Worse than 53% of models
    This tablet offers shorter update support than the average tablet (short vs medium). The average tablet gets medium of update support.
    short vs medium
  • Worse main-camera video
    Video recording (main camera)
    480 x 30 fps
    â–¼ Worse than 95% of models
    This tablet supports worse main-camera video recording than the average tablet (480x30 fps vs 1080x30 fps). The average tablet supports 1080x30 fps main-camera video recording.
    480x30 fps vs 1080x30 fps
  • 39.2% smaller battery capacity
    Battery capacity
    4,000 mAh
    â–¼ Worse than 85% of models
    Market range: <4k mAh – >10.1k mAh
    This tablet has a lower battery capacity than the average tablet (4000 mAh vs 6580 mAh). The average tablet battery has capacity of 6580 mAh.
    4,000 mAh vs 6,580 mAh
  • No LTE support
    LTE support
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 63% of models
    This tablet does not support LTE, the average tablet does. 63.2% of tablets support LTE.
  • Less durable display glass
    Display glass type
    Plastic
    â–¼ Worse than 98% of models
    This tablet uses weaker display glass than the average tablet (Plastic vs Corning Gorilla Glass). Display glass choice still varies across tablets.
    Plastic vs Corning Gorilla Glass
  • 100 nits lower typical brightness
    Typical brightness
    300 nits
    â–¼ Worse than 87% of models
    Market range: <300 nits – >600 nits
    This tablet has a lower typical brightness than the average tablet (300 nits vs 400 nits). The average tablet reaches 400 nits typical brightness.
    300 nits vs 400 nits
  • 4.81x less popular
    Teclast P80 4G (2GB + 16GB) is less popular than the average tablet (1 vs 4.8).
    1 vs 4.81
  • 8.9% worse value for money
    Teclast P80 4G (2GB + 16GB) has worse value for money than the average tablet (6.52 vs 7.1).
    6.52 vs 7.1
  • 2 GB less RAM
    RAM capacity
    2 GB
    â–¼ Worse than 61% of models
    Market range: <2 GB – >12 GB
    This tablet has less RAM capacity than the average tablet (2 GB vs 4 GB). The average tablet has 4 GB of RAM.
    2 GB vs 4 GB
  • 77.5% lower Geekbench 6 single-core benchmark score
    Geekbench 6 single-core benchmark score
    164 points
    â–¼ Worse than 97% of models
    Market range: <233 points – >2.3k points
    This tablet achieves a lower Geekbench 6 single-core benchmark score than the average tablet (164 points vs 729 points). The average tablet scores 729 points in Geekbench 6 single-core.
    164 points vs 729 points
  • 75% less storage
    Internal storage
    16 GB
    â–¼ Worse than 79% of models
    Market range: <0 GB – >250 GB
    This tablet has less internal storage than the average tablet (16 GB vs 64 GB). The average tablet provides 64 GB of internal storage.
    16 GB vs 64 GB
  • 1,066 MHz slower RAM speed
    RAM speed
    800 MHz
    â–¼ Worse than 83% of models
    Market range: <800 MHz – >6.4k MHz
    This tablet has a lower RAM speed than the average tablet (800 MHz vs 1866 MHz). The average tablet has RAM speed of 1866 MHz.
    800 MHz vs 1,866 MHz
  • 2x larger process node
    Process node
    28 nm
    â–¼ Worse than 65% of models
    Market range: <4 nm – >40 nm
    This tablet uses a larger process node than the average tablet (28 nm vs 14 nm). The average tablet uses a process node of 14 nm.
    28 nm vs 14 nm
  • 20% lower CPU speed
    CPU speed
    1.6 GHz
    â–¼ Worse than 68% of models
    Market range: <1.2 GHz – >3.2 GHz
    This tablet has a lower CPU speed than the average tablet (1.6 GHz vs 2 GHz). The average tablet has CPU speed of 2 GHz.
    1.6 GHz vs 2 GHz
  • 2 fewer CPU threads
    CPU threads
    4
    â–¼ Worse than 53% of models
    Market range: <2 – >12
    This tablet has less CPU threads than the average tablet (4 vs 6). The average tablet has 6 CPU threads.
    4 vs 6
  • No big.LITTLE architecture
    big.LITTLE Architecture
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 51% of models
    This tablet does not use a big.LITTLE architecture, the average tablet does. 51.3% of tablets use a big.LITTLE architecture.
  • Worse GPU
    GPU model
    GE8300
    â–¼ Worse than 68% of models
    This tablet uses the GE8300 GPU, while the average tablet uses the stronger Mali-G51. GPU choice is one of the main performance differences between tablets.
    GE8300 vs Mali-G51
  • 2 fewer GPU execution units
    GPU execution units
    2
    â–¼ Worse than 66% of models
    Market range: <2 – >24
    This tablet has less GPU execution units than the average tablet (2 vs 4). The average tablet has 4 GPU execution units.
    2 vs 4
  • Less capable chipset
    Chipset
    Allwinner A133
    â–¼ Worse than 99% of models
    This tablet uses the Allwinner A133 chipset, while the average tablet uses the newer MediaTek MT8169A.
    Allwinner A133 vs MediaTek MT8169A
  • Less durable display glass
    Display glass type
    Plastic
    â–¼ Worse than 98% of models
    This tablet uses weaker display glass than the average tablet (Plastic vs Corning Gorilla Glass). Display glass choice still varies across tablets.
    Plastic vs Corning Gorilla Glass
  • 100 nits lower typical brightness
    Typical brightness
    300 nits
    â–¼ Worse than 87% of models
    Market range: <300 nits – >600 nits
    This tablet has a lower typical brightness than the average tablet (300 nits vs 400 nits). The average tablet reaches 400 nits typical brightness.
    300 nits vs 400 nits
  • Lower contrast ratio
    Contrast ratio
    700:1
    â–¼ Worse than 95% of models
    This tablet has a lower contrast ratio than the average tablet (700:1 vs 1015:1). The average tablet has a contrast ratio of 1015:1.
    700:1 vs 1,015:1
  • Lower screen resolution
    Screen resolution
    1280×800
    â–¼ Worse than 68% of models
    This tablet has a lower screen resolution than the average tablet (1280×800 vs 1920×1200). The average tablet has a resolution of 1920×1200.
    1280×800 vs 1920×1200
  • 2.1 inches smaller screen size
    Screen size
    8 inches
    â–¼ Worse than 76% of models
    Market range: <7 inches – >12 inches
    This tablet has a lower screen size than the average tablet (8 inches vs 10.1 inches). The average tablet has screen size of 10.1 inches.
    8 inches vs 10.1 inches
  • 16.1% lower pixel density
    Pixel density
    188 ppi
    â–¼ Worse than 73% of models
    Market range: <149 ppi – >291 ppi
    This tablet has a lower pixel density than the average tablet (188 ppi vs 224 ppi). The average tablet has pixel density of 224 ppi.
    188 ppi vs 224 ppi
  • 33 ppi lower screen sharpness
    Screen sharpness
    188 ppi
    â–¼ Worse than 73% of models
    Market range: <149 ppi – >291 ppi
    This tablet has a lower screen sharpness than the average tablet (188 ppi vs 221 ppi). The average tablet has screen sharpness of 221 ppi.
    188 ppi vs 221 ppi
  • 4.7 MP lower front camera megapixels
    Front camera megapixels
    0.3 MP
    â–¼ Worse than 93% of models
    Market range: <1.2 MP – >9 MP
    This tablet has less front camera megapixels than the average tablet (0.3 MP vs 5 MP). The average tablet has 5 MP front camera resolution.
    0.3 MP vs 5 MP
  • Worse main-camera video
    Video recording (main camera)
    480 x 30 fps
    â–¼ Worse than 95% of models
    This tablet supports worse main-camera video recording than the average tablet (480x30 fps vs 1080x30 fps). The average tablet supports 1080x30 fps main-camera video recording.
    480x30 fps vs 1080x30 fps
  • No manual exposure control
    Manual exposure
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 64% of models
    This tablet does not offer manual exposure control, the average tablet does. 63.6% of tablets have manual exposure.
  • No HDR photo mode
    HDR photo mode
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 80% of models
    This tablet does not have HDR photo mode, the average tablet does. 79.6% of tablets support HDR photo mode.
  • Narrower main camera aperture
    Main camera aperture
    f/2.8
    â–¼ Worse than 90% of models
    This tablet has a worse main camera aperture than the average tablet (f/2.8 vs f/2.2). The average tablet uses f/2.2 main camera aperture.
    f/2.8 vs f/2.2
  • No panorama mode
    Panorama mode
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 79% of models
    This tablet does not have a panorama mode, the average tablet does. 78.6% of tablets include panorama features.
  • No timelapse video
    Timelapse video
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 58% of models
    This tablet does not support timelapse video, the average tablet does. 57.5% of tablets include timelapse modes.
  • 4 hours shorter battery life
    Battery life
    6 hours
    â–¼ Worse than 92% of models
    Market range: <6 hours – >16 hours
    This tablet offers shorter battery life than the average tablet (6 hours vs 10 hours). The average tablet offers 10 hours of battery life.
    6 hours vs 10 hours
  • 39.2% smaller battery capacity
    Battery capacity
    4,000 mAh
    â–¼ Worse than 85% of models
    Market range: <4k mAh – >10.1k mAh
    This tablet has a lower battery capacity than the average tablet (4000 mAh vs 6580 mAh). The average tablet battery has capacity of 6580 mAh.
    4,000 mAh vs 6,580 mAh
  • 44.4% slower charging speed
    Charging speed
    10 W
    â–¼ Worse than 61% of models
    Market range: <10 W – >60 W
    This tablet supports slower charging than the average tablet (10 W vs 18 W). The average tablet supports charging speed of 18 W.
    10 W vs 18 W
  • No LTE support
    LTE support
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 63% of models
    This tablet does not support LTE, the average tablet does. 63.2% of tablets support LTE.
  • No cellular module
    Cellular module
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 59% of models
    This tablet does not have a cellular module, the average tablet does. 59.3% of tablets include a cellular module.
  • No HDMI output
    HDMI output
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 50% of models
    This tablet does not have an HDMI output, the average tablet does. 50.1% of tablets support HDMI output.
  • No face recognition
    Face recognition
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 56% of models
    This tablet does not have face recognition, the average tablet does. 56% of tablets support face recognition.
  • Shorter update support
    Update support duration
    short
    â–¼ Worse than 53% of models
    This tablet offers shorter update support than the average tablet (short vs medium). The average tablet gets medium of update support.
    short vs medium
  • No camera/mic privacy toggles
    Camera/mic privacy
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 56% of models
    This tablet lacks camera and microphone privacy toggles, the average tablet includes them. 56.2% of tablets offer these toggles.
  • No full-page screenshots
    Full-page screenshots
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 53% of models
    This tablet does not support full-page screenshots, the average tablet does. 52.5% of tablets support full-page screenshots.
  • 1.3 mm thicker
    Thickness
    9.3 mm
    â–¼ Worse than 73% of models
    Market range: <6.1 mm – >11.5 mm
    This tablet is thicker than the average tablet (9.3 mm vs 8 mm). The average tablet is 8.0 mm thick.
    9.3 mm vs 8.0 mm
  • 1 fewer speakers
    N. of speakers
    1
    â–¼ Worse than 90% of models
    Market range: <1 – >6
    This tablet has less speakers than the average tablet (1 vs 2). The average tablet has 2 speakers.
    1 vs 2

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

P
pcdemano.com
01/08/2018
Summary of the review
Teclast P80, una económica tablet 3G de 8 pulgadas... por...
(Translated)Show original
T
today.it
13/08/2019
Summary of the review
Teclast P80X: la recensione di un completo tablet da 8 pollici
(Translated)Show original
T
tweakers.net
21/09/2018
Summary of the review
Teclast P80 Pro Champagne - DukeN - Product reviews
(Translated)Show original
C
consumentenbond.nl
01/06/2015
Summary of the review
Teclast P80 3G - Test, Reviews & Prijzen
(Translated)Show original

Third-party reviews

What we like about Teclast P80 4G (2GB + 16GB)

  • Affordable pricing makes it a high-value 'entry-level' or 'starter' tablet.
  • Compact 8-inch design with narrow bezels allows for easy one-handed use.
  • IPS display provides decent resolution (up to 1920x1200 on Pro models) with crisp visuals for streaming and reading.
  • Includes useful physical ports such as a 3.5mm headphone jack and micro SD card slot for storage expansion.
  • Comes with helpful accessories like a pre-applied screen protector and a power brick.

What we don't like about Teclast P80 4G (2GB + 16GB)

  • Slow overall performance and lag, especially when multitasking or running heavy applications.
  • Poor long-term reliability with reports of charging ports breaking or batteries failing after a few months.
  • Weak camera quality (0.3MP front / 2MP rear) that is often described as unsuitable for anything beyond basic video chat.
  • Inconsistent battery life; some users report rapid discharge even during standby.
  • Inferior wireless connectivity, with some users noting limited range for Wi-Fi and Bluetooth compared to premium devices.

Verdict

The Teclast P80 4G is a budget-friendly 8-inch tablet featuring a 1280x800 IPS HD display with a 16:10 aspect ratio and narrow 6mm bezels for comfortable one-handed use. It is powered by an Allwinner A133 quad-core processor paired with a Rogue GE8300 GPU, 2GB of RAM, and 16GB of internal storage, which can be expanded via a dedicated microSD slot. Its primary strengths include its highly portable, lightweight 310g design, the inclusion of a 3.5mm headphone jack, and stable connectivity through dual-band Wi-Fi and Bluetooth 5.0. However, the device is limited by its small 16GB storage capacity, low-resolution cameras (0.3MP front and 2.0MP rear), and a modest 4000mAh battery that some users report has poor standby performance.

Compare Teclast P80 4G (2GB + 16GB) with other tablets

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Teclast P80 4G (2GB + 16GB) and other tablets

No results found