OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS
Scored using Tablets Methodology v3.0
Tablets Methodology v3.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontum Tablets Methodology v3.0: the technical score from the specifications is the base, and independent expert and video reviews (up to ±0.5 points), owner opinions (up to ±0.3) and best-of lists (up to +0.3) move it up or down.
Explore Tablets Methodology v3.0

Sony Tablet S WiFi (1GB + 32GB) review: 168 specs compared

Avg. price:~£440RAM capacity:1 GBInternal storage:32 GBScreen size:9.4 inchesChipset:Nvidia Tegra 2 T20

Sony Tablet S WiFi (1GB + 32GB) Review: Compare 168 technical specifications and 38 expert and video reviews to see how this product ranks in the Tablets category and whether it is worth buying.

6.4/10

Overall score

Score
6.4/ 10
✕
What it is
Our main score for this model, 1–10. It combines specs, best-of lists, expert reviews and owners.
How we count it
Parts: Technical score 35%, List score 30%, Reviews score 25%, Sentiment score 10%
Marks: Each part gets a mark out of 10. For reviews, lists and owners, a typical model in this category gets about 8 and the best one gets 10.
No data yet: A part with no data shows "?". It counts as the mark of a weaker model in this category (4 in 5 models with data score higher). This way, models with reviews, lists and owners usually come out ahead.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▼ Worse than 73% of models
Score components

35%

4.8

Technical score

30%

?

List scoreNot enough data yet, so we use 7.5, the mark of a weaker model in this category

25%

7.9

Reviews score

10%

4.8

Sentiment score

▼Worse than 73% of tablets
6.9

Value for money

Value for money
6.9/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the tablet's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a tablet with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▼ Worse than 87% of models
Score components

70%

6.4

Overall score

30%

8.2

Price

▼Worse than 87%
4.8

Technical score

Technical score
4.8/ 10
✕
What it is
How good the specs are compared with the other models in this category, 1–10.
How we count it
Areas: We rate the specs in each area against the other models in this category.
Weighting: The areas that matter most to buyers count more. The shares are shown under Score components.
Share: The technical score is 35% of the overall score.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▼ Worse than 93% of models
Score components

22%

4.0

Performance

20%

4.4

Display

16%

4.9

Camera

14%

4.9

Battery

12%

5.8

Connectivity

8%

6.0

Software

5%

5.4

Design

3%

4.8

Audio

▼Worse than 93%
7.9

Reviews score

Reviews score
7.9/ 10
✕
What it is
Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
How we count it
Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves. Big test sites count more, short reviews half as much as full tests. A video review counts half.
Score: The average grade is 80% of the review mark; the number of reviews is the other 20% (1 review = 5, the typical number in this category = 8, the most-reviewed model = 10).
Enough data: With few reviews, the average grade is pulled toward the typical grade of this category. No reviews yet: 7.4 for now.
Share: Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▲ Better than 52% of models

80%

7.7

Average grade

20%

9.0

Popularity

Grades by review (38)
29 reviews: 13 with a printed score, 16 estimated from the review. 9 video reviews, each counting half as much as a written test. Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
User ratings collected online are not part of this score.
▲Better than 52%
?

List score

List score
7.5/ 10
✕
What it is
How often independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers put this model in their best-of lists for this category.
How we count it
Points: The model in the most lists of this category gets 10; the others get 8 to 10 in proportion. In no list yet: 7.5. Lists count 30% of the overall score.
Enough data: Every list counts, even a single one. With fewer than 5 best-of lists in the category, this part is left out.
Lists with this model (0)
Not in any best-of list yet, so this part counts as 7.5. Models in a list get 8 to 10.
Not in any best-of list yet
  • No image
No image
Where to buy
    N/A~ £440
Best rankings
Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Other versions:
1GB + 32GB1GB + 16GB

What reviewers say about the Sony Tablet S WiFi (1GB + 32GB)

Based on 26 · 11

Reviewers love the handy remote control and comfortable wedge shape, but complain about weak battery life and poor build quality.
Praised
Mixed views
Criticised
Pick a topic to see who said what

What owners say about the Sony Tablet S WiFi (1GB + 32GB)

Based on 128 owners sharing their experience in online comments

41%positive11%mixed48%negative

Owners praise the comfortable design, gaming features, and smooth browsing, while lag, Wi-Fi trouble, and aging software frustrate many.

What owners dislike

  • Owners say it lags, especially in apps and games, and that closing open apps from the recent-apps button reduces the slowdown.12
  • Owners say some apps and games will not install or run, including Play Store and PS1 games that lack support.9
  • Owners say the tablet is stuck on old Android versions, so newer apps and games do not run and it cannot be updated.7
  • Owners say the tablet uses a proprietary charger that is hard to find, often costs more than the tablet, and its connector can fail.6
  • Owners say Wi-Fi drops when the screen turns off after 15 to 30 seconds and fails to reconnect after long sleep, and a reboot is the only fix.5
  • Owners say HD and MKV video plays choppily or in slow motion, because the older Tegra 2 processor cannot handle high-profile files.4
  • Owners say the tablet stays stuck on the startup animation or logo and never gets past it, even after restarting.4
  • Owners say the 16 GB model gives only about 10 to 11 GB of usable space, and apps cannot be moved to the SD card.3
  • Owners report the tablet freezes, crashes, or shuts down randomly, with system UI and home page crash messages.3
  • Owners report the screen cracked or leaked a sticky liquid within a short time after purchase.3

Points mentioned by at least 3 owners, most mentioned first.

Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of tablet Sony Tablet S WiFi (1GB + 32GB)

Technical score
Technical score
4.8/ 10
✕
What it is
How good the specs are compared with the other models in this category, 1–10.
How we count it
Areas: We rate the specs in each area against the other models in this category.
Weighting: The areas that matter most to buyers count more. The shares are shown under Score components.
Share: The technical score is 35% of the overall score.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▼ Worse than 93% of models
Score components:

22%

4.0

Performance

20%

4.4

Display

16%

4.9

Camera

14%

4.9

Battery

12%

5.8

Connectivity

8%

6.0

Software

5%

5.4

Design

3%

4.8

Audio

4.8
Reviews score
7.9
List score
?
Value for money
Value for money
6.9/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the tablet's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a tablet with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▼ Worse than 87% of models
Score components:

70%

6.4

Overall score

30%

8.2

Price

6.9
RAM capacity
1 GB
Market range: <1 GB – >8 GB
This tablet has 1 GB of RAM, which is less than 78% of tablets and equal to 19.1% of tablets.
Process node
40 nm
Market range: <4 nm – >40 nm
This tablet is built on a 40 nm process, which is larger than 86.9% of tablets and equal to 8% of tablets.
Internal storage
32 GB
Market range: <16 GB – >256 GB
This tablet has 32 GB of internal storage, which is less than 60.9% of tablets and equal to 17.9% of tablets.
Geekbench 6 single-core score
?
Chipset
Nvidia Tegra 2 T20
This tablet runs on Nvidia Tegra 2 T20, which is less advanced than 70.5% of tablets and equal to 2.6% of tablets.
Show more
What reviewers say
Screen resolution
1280×800
This tablet has a 1280×800 screen, which is less sharp than 68.1% of tablets and equal to 21.7% of tablets.
Refresh rate
60 Hz
Market range: <60 Hz – >120 Hz
This tablet has a 60 Hz screen, which is smoother than 0.1% of tablets and equal to 73.4% of tablets.
Display type
TFT LCD
This tablet uses a TFT LCD display type. 89.9% of tablets use this display technology.
Pixel density
161 ppi
Market range: <149 ppi – >291 ppi
This tablet has a pixel density of 161 ppi, which is lower than 82.8% of tablets and equal to 0.4% of tablets.
Display glass type
Corning Gorilla Glass
This tablet protects its screen with Corning Gorilla Glass, which is more durable than 45.4% of tablets and the same as 32.8% of tablets.
Show more
What reviewers say
Optical image stabilization
no
This tablet does not support optical stabilisation. 0.4% of tablets offer this.
Main camera megapixels
5 MP
Market range: <3.15 MP – >13 MP
This tablet has a rear camera with 5 MP resolution, which is lower than 63.7% of tablets and equal to 26% of tablets.
Front camera megapixels
0.3 MP
Market range: <1.2 MP – >9 MP
This tablet has a front camera with 0.3 MP resolution, which is lower than 93% of tablets and equal to 7% of tablets.
Main camera aperture
f/2.4
This tablet has a main camera aperture of f/2.4, which is narrower than 70% of tablets and equal to 17.5% of tablets.
Optical zoom
N/A
Show more
What reviewers say
Battery capacity
5,000 mAh
Market range: <4k mAh – >10.1k mAh
This tablet has 5,000 mAh battery capacity, which is smaller than 70% of tablets and equal to 2% of tablets.
Charging speed
30 W
Market range: <10 W – >45 W
This tablet charges at 30 W, which is faster than 71.2% of tablets and equal to 3.2% of tablets.
Battery life
8 hours
Market range: <7 hours – >16 hours
This tablet has a battery life of 8 hours, which is shorter than that of 72.2% of tablets and equal to that of 11.9% of tablets.
mixed use
Wireless charging
no
This tablet does not support wireless charging. 1.5% of tablets offer this.
Fast charging
yes
This tablet supports fast charging. 43.2% of tablets offer this.
Show more
What reviewers say
LTE support
no
This tablet does not have built-in LTE. 42.9% of tablets offer this.
Wi-Fi connectivity
yes
This tablet connects to Wi-Fi. 0.2% of tablets offer this.
GPS
yes
This tablet has built-in GPS. 17.1% of tablets offer this.
5G connectivity
no
This tablet does not support 5G. 8.1% of tablets offer this.
NFC
no
This tablet does not include NFC. 10.8% of tablets offer this.
Show more
What reviewers say
Operating system
Android
This tablet uses the Android operating system, which is more advanced than the one used by 23.2%.
Update support duration
short
This tablet offers short update support, which is shorter than the support period of 52.4% of tablets and equal to that of 47.6% of tablets.
Direct OS updates
yes
This tablet supports direct OS updates. 20.3% of tablets offer this.
On-device AI
no
This tablet does not support on-device AI. 28.3% of tablets support this capability.
App tracking protection
no
This tablet does not support app tracking protection. 28.4% of tablets offer this.
Show more
What reviewers say
IP rating
IPX4
This tablet's IP rating is IPX4, which is more protected than 83.9% of tablets and the same as 0.4% of tablets.
Weight
598 g
Market range: <315 g – >730 g
This tablet weighs 598 g, which is heavier than 75.6% of tablets and equal to 0.6% of tablets.
Backlit keyboard
no
This tablet does not support a backlit keyboard. 9.7% of tablets support backlit keyboards.
Keyboard accessory
yes
This tablet supports a keyboard accessory. 15.8% of tablets support this option.
Pen latency
N/A
Show more
What reviewers say
Number of microphones
1
Market range: <1 – >3
This tablet has a microphone array of 1, which is more than 0.2% of tablets and equal to 54.8% of tablets.
aptX Adaptive
no
This tablet does not support aptX Adaptive. 6.9% of tablets offer this.
Dolby Atmos support
no
This tablet does not support Dolby Atmos. 31.3% of tablets support Dolby Atmos.
N. of speakers
2
Market range: <2 – >4
This tablet includes 2 speakers, which is more than in 9.8% of tablets and equal to the number in 60.8% of tablets.
FM radio
no
This tablet does not include an FM radio. 19% of tablets offer this.
Show more

Sony Tablet S WiFi (1GB + 32GB) vs the average tablet

246810TotalPerformanceDisplayCameraBatteryConnectivitySoftwareDesignAudio
  • 66.7% faster charging
    This tablet charges faster than the average tablet (30 W vs 18 W). The average tablet charges at 18 W.
    30 W vs 18 W
  • More dust and water protection
    This tablet offers better dust and water protection than the average tablet (IPX4 vs not rated).
    IPX4 vs not rated
  • 12.9% higher review score
    Reviews score
    7.9/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
    How we count it
    Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves. Big test sites count more, short reviews half as much as full tests. A video review counts half.
    Score: The average grade is 80% of the review mark; the number of reviews is the other 20% (1 review = 5, the typical number in this category = 8, the most-reviewed model = 10).
    Enough data: With few reviews, the average grade is pulled toward the typical grade of this category. No reviews yet: 7.4 for now.
    Share: Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
    Score distribution
    ▼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    ▲ Better than 52% of models

    80%

    7.7

    Average grade

    20%

    9.0

    Popularity

    Grades by review (38)
    29 reviews: 13 with a printed score, 16 estimated from the review. 9 video reviews, each counting half as much as a written test. Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
    User ratings collected online are not part of this score.
    7.9 vs 7.0
  • More advanced chipset
    This tablet has a more advanced chipset than the average tablet (Nvidia Tegra 2 T20 vs MediaTek MT8169A).
    Nvidia Tegra 2 T20 vs MediaTek MT8169A
  • Supports HDMI output
    This tablet supports HDMI output, while the average tablet does not. 49.8% of tablets offer this.
  • 4 more GPU execution units
    This tablet has more GPU execution units than the average tablet (8 vs 4). The average tablet has 4 GPU execution units.
    8 vs 4
  • 12.9% higher review score
    Reviews score
    7.9/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
    How we count it
    Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves. Big test sites count more, short reviews half as much as full tests. A video review counts half.
    Score: The average grade is 80% of the review mark; the number of reviews is the other 20% (1 review = 5, the typical number in this category = 8, the most-reviewed model = 10).
    Enough data: With few reviews, the average grade is pulled toward the typical grade of this category. No reviews yet: 7.4 for now.
    Share: Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
    Score distribution
    ▼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    ▲ Better than 52% of models

    80%

    7.7

    Average grade

    20%

    9.0

    Popularity

    Grades by review (38)
    29 reviews: 13 with a printed score, 16 estimated from the review. 9 video reviews, each counting half as much as a written test. Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
    User ratings collected online are not part of this score.
    7.9 vs 7.0
  • More advanced chipset
    This tablet has a more advanced chipset than the average tablet (Nvidia Tegra 2 T20 vs MediaTek MT8169A).
    Nvidia Tegra 2 T20 vs MediaTek MT8169A
  • 4 more GPU execution units
    This tablet has more GPU execution units than the average tablet (8 vs 4). The average tablet has 4 GPU execution units.
    8 vs 4
  • 66.7% faster charging
    This tablet charges faster than the average tablet (30 W vs 18 W). The average tablet charges at 18 W.
    30 W vs 18 W
  • Supports HDMI output
    This tablet supports HDMI output, while the average tablet does not. 49.8% of tablets offer this.
  • More dust and water protection
    This tablet offers better dust and water protection than the average tablet (IPX4 vs not rated).
    IPX4 vs not rated
  • 4.7 MP lower front resolution
    This tablet has a lower-resolution front camera than the average tablet (0.3 MP vs 5 MP). The average tablet has a front camera of 5 MP.
    0.3 MP vs 5 MP
  • 6 fewer CPU threads
    This tablet has fewer CPU threads than the average tablet (2 vs 8). The average tablet has 8 CPU threads.
    2 vs 8
  • Inferior display type
    This tablet has an inferior display type compared to the average tablet (TFT LCD vs IPS LCD). 0.00% of tablets use the superior display type.
    TFT LCD vs IPS LCD
  • No USB-C port
    This tablet does not have a USB Type-C port, while the average tablet does. 54% of tablets have one.
  • 3 GB less RAM
    This tablet has less RAM than the average tablet (1 GB vs 4 GB). The average tablet has 4 GB of RAM.
    1 GB vs 4 GB
  • 50% lower CPU speed
    This tablet has a lower CPU speed than the average tablet (1 GHz vs 2 GHz). The average tablet has CPU speed of 2 GHz.
    1 GHz vs 2 GHz
  • More basic graphics
    This tablet has less advanced graphics than the average tablet (ULP GeForce vs Mali-G51).
    ULP GeForce vs Mali-G51
  • Shorter update support
    This tablet offers shorter update support than the average tablet (short vs medium). The average tablet gets medium of update support.
    short vs medium
  • 36.0% lower sentiment score
    4.8 vs 7.5
  • 8.8% worse value for money
    Sony Tablet S WiFi (1GB + 32GB) has worse value for money than the average tablet (6.94 vs 7.6).
    6.94 vs 7.55
  • 69.2% more expensive
    Sony Tablet S WiFi (1GB + 32GB) is more expensive than the average tablet (£440 vs £260).
    £440 vs £260
  • 6 fewer CPU threads
    This tablet has fewer CPU threads than the average tablet (2 vs 8). The average tablet has 8 CPU threads.
    2 vs 8
  • 3 GB less RAM
    This tablet has less RAM than the average tablet (1 GB vs 4 GB). The average tablet has 4 GB of RAM.
    1 GB vs 4 GB
  • 50% lower CPU speed
    This tablet has a lower CPU speed than the average tablet (1 GHz vs 2 GHz). The average tablet has CPU speed of 2 GHz.
    1 GHz vs 2 GHz
  • More basic graphics
    This tablet has less advanced graphics than the average tablet (ULP GeForce vs Mali-G51).
    ULP GeForce vs Mali-G51
  • 2.86x larger process node
    This tablet has a larger process node than the average tablet (40 nm vs 14 nm). The average tablet is built on 14 nm.
    40 nm vs 14 nm
  • 83.9% less memory bandwidth
    This tablet has less memory bandwidth than the average tablet (2.4 GB/s vs 14.9 GB/s). The average tablet has 14.9 GB/s of memory bandwidth.
    2.4 GB/s vs 14.9 GB/s
  • No big.LITTLE architecture
    This tablet does not support big.LITTLE architecture, while the average tablet does. 51.7% of tablets support big.LITTLE architecture.
  • 38.5% slower GPU clock
    This tablet runs its GPU slower than the average tablet (400 MHz vs 650 MHz). The average tablet runs its GPU at 650 MHz.
    400 MHz vs 650 MHz
  • 50% less internal storage
    This tablet has less internal storage than the average tablet (32 GB vs 64 GB). The average tablet has 64 GB of internal storage.
    32 GB vs 64 GB
  • 8 years older
    This tablet was released earlier than the average tablet (2011 vs 2019). The average tablet was released in 2019.
    September 2011
    2011 vs 2019
  • More basic memory type
    This tablet uses less advanced memory than the average tablet (LPDDR2 vs LPDDR3).
    LPDDR2 vs LPDDR3
  • Inferior display type
    This tablet has an inferior display type compared to the average tablet (TFT LCD vs IPS LCD). 0.00% of tablets use the superior display type.
    TFT LCD vs IPS LCD
  • 27.1% softer screen detail
    This tablet has softer screen detail than the average tablet (161 ppi vs 221 ppi). The average tablet has a pixel density of 221 ppi.
    161 ppi vs 221 ppi
  • Less sharp display
    This tablet has a less sharp screen than the average tablet (1280×800 vs 1920×1200).
    1,280×800 vs 1,920×1,200
  • Less vivid contrast
    This tablet has less contrast than the average tablet (842:1 vs 1015:1). The average tablet has a contrast ratio of 1015:1.
    842:1 vs 1,015:1
  • 8 nits dimmer screen
    This tablet is dimmer than the average tablet (393 nits vs 401 nits). The average tablet reaches 401 nits.
    393 nits vs 401 nits
  • 0.7 inches smaller screen
    This tablet has a smaller screen than the average tablet (9.4 inches vs 10.1 inches). The average tablet measures 10.1 inches.
    9.4 inches vs 10.1 inches
  • 50% slower touch response
    This tablet samples touch more slowly than the average tablet (60 Hz vs 120 Hz). The average tablet samples touch at 120 Hz.
    60 Hz vs 120 Hz
  • 7 nits lower typical brightness
    This tablet has a lower typical brightness than the average tablet (393 nits vs 400 nits). The average tablet reaches 400 nits typical brightness.
    393 nits vs 400 nits
  • 4.7 MP lower front resolution
    This tablet has a lower-resolution front camera than the average tablet (0.3 MP vs 5 MP). The average tablet has a front camera of 5 MP.
    0.3 MP vs 5 MP
  • Worse main-camera video
    This tablet supports worse main-camera video recording than the average tablet (720x30 fps vs 1080x30 fps). The average tablet supports 1080x30 fps main-camera video recording.
    720x30 fps vs 1080x30 fps
  • 3 MP lower rear resolution
    This tablet has a lower-resolution rear camera than the average tablet (5 MP vs 8 MP). The average tablet has a rear camera of 8 MP.
    5 MP vs 8 MP
  • No manual exposure control
    This tablet does not support manual exposure, while the average tablet does. 63.6% of tablets support manual exposure.
  • No HDR photo mode
    This tablet does not have HDR photo mode, the average tablet does. 79.8% of tablets support HDR photo mode.
  • No burst mode
    This tablet does not support burst mode, the average tablet does. 60.6% of tablets support burst mode.
  • No panorama mode
    This tablet does not support panorama mode, while the average tablet does. 78.6% of tablets support panorama mode.
  • No backside-illuminated sensor
    This tablet does not have a BSI sensor, while the average tablet does. 52.6% of tablets have a BSI sensor.
  • Narrower main camera aperture
    This tablet has a narrower main camera aperture than the average tablet (f/2.4 vs f/2.2). The average tablet's main camera aperture is f/2.2.
    f/2.4 vs f/2.2
  • 2 hours shorter battery life
    This tablet offers shorter battery life than the average tablet (8 hours vs 10 hours). The average tablet offers 10 hours of battery life.
    mixed use
    8 hours vs 10 hours
  • 24.2% smaller battery capacity
    This tablet has a smaller battery capacity than the average tablet (5,000 mAh vs 6,600 mAh). The average tablet offers 6,600 mAh of battery capacity.
    5,000 mAh vs 6,600 mAh
  • No USB-C port
    This tablet does not have a USB Type-C port, while the average tablet does. 54% of tablets have one.
  • Older Bluetooth version
    This tablet has an older Bluetooth version than the average tablet (2.1 vs 5).
    2.1 vs 5
  • Older Wi-Fi standard
    This tablet has an older Wi-Fi standard than the average tablet (Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n) vs Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac)).
    Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n) vs Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac)
  • No face recognition
    This tablet does not have face recognition, the average tablet does. 56.4% of tablets support face recognition.
  • Shorter update support
    This tablet offers shorter update support than the average tablet (short vs medium). The average tablet gets medium of update support.
    short vs medium
  • No split-screen
    This tablet does not support split-screen, the average tablet does. 72.8% of tablets support split-screen.
  • No picture-in-picture mode
    This tablet does not support picture-in-picture, the average tablet does. 61.4% of tablets support picture-in-picture.
  • No camera and mic privacy
    This tablet does not support camera and mic privacy, while the average tablet does. 56.6% of tablets offer this.
  • No multi-user mode
    User score
    8.0/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    Average of independent expert reviews and videos, graded by us; missing reviews count as 7/10.
    When it matters
    When you want to know how independent test sites and video reviewers rate the product in real use.
    Score distribution
    ▼
    ▼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    Sony Tablet S WiFi
    the average tablet
    Sony Tablet S WiFi (1GB + 32GB) does not support multi-user mode, while the average tablet does. 73.8% of tablets offer this.
  • No full-page screenshots
    This tablet does not support full-page screenshots, the average tablet does. 53% of tablets support full-page screenshots.
  • No location privacy
    This tablet does not support location privacy, while the average tablet does. 76.7% of tablets offer this.
  • No dark mode
    This tablet does not support dark mode, while the average tablet does. 57.7% of tablets offer this.
  • 22% heavier
    This tablet is heavier than the average tablet (598 g vs 490 g). The average tablet weighs 490 g.
    598 g vs 490 g
  • 2.1 mm thicker
    This tablet is thicker than the average tablet (10.1 mm vs 8 mm). The average tablet is 8 mm thick.
    10.1 mm vs 8 mm

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

Not graded yet
Not graded yet
Not graded yet
Not graded yet
Not graded yet
Not graded yet
Not graded yet
Not graded yet

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

6.0
theverge.com
✓ explicit
24/10/2011
Hands-on review · Honeycomb tablet
Verdict
The Sony Tablet S stands out for its shape and handy infrared remote, but its cheap plastic build, tinny speakers and awkward buttons hold it back.
6.0
gizmodo.com
≈ estimated
31/08/2011
Hands-on review · Honeycomb design
Verdict
The Sony Tablet S has a comfortable, unusual shape and a handy remote, but flimsy plastic, a screen that scratches easily and slowdowns hold it back.
7.0
laptopmag.com
✓ explicit
30/08/2011
Hands-on test · Entertainment tablet
Verdict
The Sony Tablet S is a stylish entertainment tablet with a TruBlack display and PlayStation games, but its software is still unfinished.
8.0
wired.com
≈ estimated
31/08/2011
Hands-on test · Early look
Verdict
The Sony Tablet S wins on its comfortable magazine-like shape and bright screen, but its plain Android software and proprietary charger hold it back.
9.0
mobiletechreview.com
≈ estimated
21/09/2011
Hands-on review · Lifestyle tablet
Verdict
The Sony Tablet S is a comfortable, stylish lifestyle tablet with Sony media apps, but its USB and SD storage support is poorly integrated into the system.
7.5
cnet.com
✓ explicit
09/01/2012
Hands-on test · Folded-magazine design
Verdict
The Sony Tablet S has an unusual magazine-shaped look and enough power for most tasks, but it is underpowered next to quad-core rivals and a bit dim.
6.0
techcrunch.com
≈ estimated
15/12/2011
Hands-on review · Android tablet
Verdict
The Sony Tablet S has a striking, comfortable design and smooth PlayStation games, but sluggish browsing and frequent Wi-Fi drops are frustrating.
6.0
itpro.com
✓ explicit
28/10/2011
Hands-on review · Business use
Verdict
The Sony Tablet S has a practical folded shape and a full-size SD slot, but its lack of video output and weak camera mean it isn't quite a business tablet.
8.6
notebookcheck.net
✓ explicit
06/10/2011
Lab test · Hardware and connectivity
Verdict
The Sony Tablet S is a comfortable 9.4-inch tablet with a standard SD slot and handy remote function, held back by having to copy media first and a fingerprint-prone screen.
9.0
businesstoday.in
≈ estimated
13/12/2011
Hands-on review · Media sharing
Verdict
The Sony Tablet S is a stylish, light tablet that excels at sending video to a Sony TV, though it has no SIM slot for mobile data.
5.0
reviewed.com
≈ estimated
2011
Lab test · Battery and screen
Verdict
The Sony Tablet S is a responsive tablet with a useful TV remote, but its short battery life and washed-out screen outdoors make it a home-only device.
8.0
techradar.com
✓ explicit
30/09/2011
Full review · Magazine-shaped design
Verdict
The Sony Tablet S is a distinctive Android tablet with PlayStation games and a universal remote, but it is less polished than the iPad 2.
C
cnet.com
15/09/2011
✓ explicit
7.0
Summary of the review
Sony S review: Sony S
W
whathifi.com
07/12/2011
✓ explicit
8.0
Summary of the review
Sony Tablet S review
T
thevooner.com
23/02/2012
✓ explicit
4.0
Summary of the review
Sony Tablet S-Series Review
9.0
chip.de
≈ estimated
28/09/2011
Lab test · Display and battery
Verdict
The Sony Tablet S has a comfortable design, smooth performance and a bright, low-glare screen, but its plastic build, middling battery and thin game library hold it back.
8.0
futurezone.at
≈ estimated
16/11/2011
Full review · Home entertainment
Verdict
The Sony Tablet S is a solid, fast tablet with a good keyboard and easy DLNA sharing, but it has cheap plastic and no office app.
9.0
android-user.de
✓ explicit
12/09/2023
Short test · Home entertainer
Verdict
The Sony Tablet S is a light tablet with a strong display, fast keyboard and built-in remote, but it scratches easily and trails rivals on battery.
8.0
connect.de
≈ estimated
22/11/2011
Test report · Remote-control tablet
Verdict
The Sony Tablet S is a smooth Android tablet with a remote that learns unusual codes, but its battery lasts under five hours and its display glares in daylight.
stern.de
01/09/2011
Not graded yet

Third-party reviews

What customers like about Sony Tablet S WiFi (1GB + 32GB)

  • Unique, ergonomic 'folded magazine' design that is comfortable for long periods of one-handed use
  • Universal IR remote control functionality for managing home entertainment systems
  • TruBlack display technology providing deep black levels and vibrant colors
  • Lightweight build that enhances portability compared to 10-inch competitors
  • Full-sized SD card slot for easy storage expansion and photo viewing
  • Includes useful pre-loaded Sony-specific apps and a customized Android interface
  • Responsive web browsing and initial snappy performance

What customers don't like about Sony Tablet S WiFi (1GB + 32GB)

  • Poor battery life, including significant drain during sleep/standby mode
  • Plastic build quality can feel 'cheap' and less solid than high-end metallic tablets
  • Proprietary charging port and cable that is bulky and inconvenient for travel
  • Under-powered hardware compared to quad-core competitors from the same era
  • Screen is a significant fingerprint magnet and can be prone to glare
  • Intermittent software lag and performance dips after opening multiple applications
  • Average camera quality with a lack of flash on the rear lens
  • Awkwardly placed physical buttons that are sometimes difficult to find or press

Verdict

The Sony Tablet S (WiFi, 32GB) is a uniquely designed Android tablet featuring a 9.4-inch TruBlack TFT LCD with a 1280 x 800 resolution, powered by an NVIDIA Tegra 2 dual-core 1.0 GHz processor and 1GB of RAM. Its signature wedge-shaped 'folded magazine' profile shifts the centre of gravity for a more comfortable one-handed grip and provides a natural typing angle on flat surfaces. Key pros include its built-in infrared (IR) blaster for universal remote functionality, a full-size SD card slot for easy storage expansion, and PlayStation Certification for gaming. However, notable cons include its reliance on a bulky proprietary charging connector, the lack of an HDMI output, and a glossy screen that is prone to significant glare and fingerprints.

Compare Sony Tablet S WiFi (1GB + 32GB) with other tablets

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Sony Tablet S WiFi (1GB + 32GB) and other tablets

No results found