OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS
Scored using Tablets Methodology v1.0
Tablets Methodology v1.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are evaluated mathematically under Frontumo Tablets Methodology v1.0 using verified laboratory benchmarks, technical specifications, and authentic consumer ratings with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Tablets Methodology v1.0

Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 10.5 LTE (3GB + 32GB) Review | 168 Data compared

Avg. price:~£180RAM capacity:3 GBInternal storage:32 GBScreen size:10.5 inchesChipset:Unisoc Tiger T618

Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 10.5 LTE (3GB + 32GB) Review: Compare 168 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Tablets category and whether it is worth buying.

6.3

Overall score

Score
6.3/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the smartphone's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best Tablets on the market.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 54% of models
Score components

90%

6.3

Technical score

10%

?

User score

â–²Better than 54% of tablets
6.3

Technical score

Technical score
6.3/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of the smartphone's technical performance, covering eight key areas: performance & hardware, software, camera, connectivity, display, battery, audio, and design.
When it matters
When you want to compare Tablets based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 57% of models
Score components

22%

5.4

Performance

20%

4.8

Display

16%

7.3

Camera

14%

6.7

Battery

12%

7.3

Connectivity

8%

7.9

Software & Features

5%

6.7

Design

3%

8.4

Audio & Multimedia

â–²Better than 57% of tablets
?

User score

User score
8.0/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the smartphone
When it matters
When you want to know how a smartphone handles daily tasks and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 63% of models
Score components

70%

?

User ratings

30%

?

Number of reviews

  • samsung-galaxy-tab-a8-10-5-3gb-32gb-lte
  • samsung-galaxy-tab-a8-10-5-3gb-32gb-lte
  • samsung-galaxy-tab-a8-10-5-3gb-32gb-lte
  • samsung-galaxy-tab-a8-10-5-3gb-32gb-lte
  • samsung-galaxy-tab-a8-10-5-3gb-32gb-lte
  • samsung-galaxy-tab-a8-10-5-3gb-32gb-lte
  • samsung-galaxy-tab-a8-10-5-3gb-32gb-lte
  • samsung-galaxy-tab-a8-10-5-3gb-32gb-lte
  • samsung-galaxy-tab-a8-10-5-3gb-32gb-lte
samsung-galaxy-tab-a8-10-5-3gb-32gb-lte
samsung-galaxy-tab-a8-10-5-3gb-32gb-lte
samsung-galaxy-tab-a8-10-5-3gb-32gb-lte
samsung-galaxy-tab-a8-10-5-3gb-32gb-lte
samsung-galaxy-tab-a8-10-5-3gb-32gb-lte
samsung-galaxy-tab-a8-10-5-3gb-32gb-lte
samsung-galaxy-tab-a8-10-5-3gb-32gb-lte
samsung-galaxy-tab-a8-10-5-3gb-32gb-lte
samsung-galaxy-tab-a8-10-5-3gb-32gb-lte

Best prices

    N/A~ £180

Best rankings

Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Other versions:
3GB + 32GB4GB + 64GB4GB + 128GB
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of tablet Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 10.5 LTE (3GB + 32GB)

Technical score
Technical score
6.3/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of the smartphone's technical performance, covering eight key areas: performance & hardware, software, camera, connectivity, display, battery, audio, and design.
When it matters
When you want to compare Tablets based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 57% of models
Score components:

22%

5.4

Performance

20%

4.8

Display

16%

7.3

Camera

14%

6.7

Battery

12%

7.3

Connectivity

8%

7.9

Software & Features

5%

6.7

Design

3%

8.4

Audio & Multimedia

6.3
User score
User score
8.0/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the smartphone
When it matters
When you want to know how a smartphone handles daily tasks and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 63% of models
Score components

70%

?

User ratings

30%

?

Number of reviews

?
Popularity
Popularity
1.0/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the smartphone.
When it matters
When you prefer to purchase a product chosen and reviewed by many other consumers.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 99% of models
Popularity:
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 10.5 LTE (3GB + 32GB) has a popularity of 1 point, which is higher than 65.8% of Tablets.
1.0
Value for money
Value for money
7.3/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the smartphone's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a smartphone with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 56% of models
Score components:

60%

6.3

Overall score

40%

9.6

Price

7.3
RAM capacity
3 GB
RAM capacity
3 GB
â–¼ Worse than 52% of models
Market range: <2 GB – >12 GB
This tablet has a RAM capacity of 3 GB which is smaller than the RAM capacity of 52.4% of tablets and equal to that of 8.5% of tablets.
Process node
12 nm
Process node
12 nm
â–² Better than 54% of models
Market range: <4 nm – >40 nm
This tablet is built on a 12 nm process node, which is smaller than the node size used in 53.7% of tablets and equal to the node used in 13.6% of tablets.
Internal storage
32 GB
Internal storage
32 GB
â–¼ Worse than 60% of models
Market range: <0 GB – >250 GB
This tablet has an internal storage capacity of 32 GB which is smaller than the storage of 60.5% of tablets and equal to that of 18% of tablets.
Geekbench 6 single-core benchmark score
438 points
Geekbench 6 single-core benchmark score
438 points
â–¼ Worse than 62% of models
Market range: <233 points – >2.3k points
This tablet scored 438 points in Geekbench 6 (single-core) which is lower than the score of 61.8% of tablets and equal to the score of 0.5% of tablets.
Chipset
Unisoc Tiger T618
Chipset
Unisoc Tiger T618
â–¼ Worse than 62% of models
This tablet uses the Unisoc Tiger T618 chipset, which is less advanced than the chipsets in 62.3% of tablets and equal to those in 0.5% of tablets.
Show more
Screen resolution
1920×1200
Screen resolution
1920×1200
â–¼ Worse than 42% of models
This tablet has a screen resolution of 1920×1200 which is higher than that of 39.2% of tablets and equal to that of 18.8% of tablets.
Refresh rate
60 Hz
Refresh rate
60 Hz
â–¼ Worse than 26% of models
Market range: <60 Hz – >120 Hz
This tablet supports a refresh rate of 60 Hz which is equal to that in 73.8% of tablets.
Display type
TFT LCD
Display type
TFT LCD
â–¼ Worse than 90% of models
This tablet uses a TFT LCD display type. 89.9% of tablets use this display technology.
Pixel density
216 ppi
Pixel density
216 ppi
â–¼ Worse than 52% of models
Market range: <149 ppi – >291 ppi
This tablet has a pixel density of 216 ppi which is lower than that of 52.1% of tablets and equal to that of 3.8% of tablets.
Display glass type
?
Show more
Optical image stabilization
no
Optical image stabilization
no
Category Benchmark
This tablet does not support optical image stabilization. 0.4% of tablets include OIS.
Main camera megapixels
8 MP
Main camera megapixels
8 MP
â–² Better than 37% of models
Market range: <3.15 MP – >13 MP
This tablet has a main camera resolution of 8 MP which is higher than that of 36.5% of tablets and equal to that of 31.8% of tablets.
Front camera megapixels
5 MP
Front camera megapixels
5 MP
â–² Better than 49% of models
Market range: <1.2 MP – >9 MP
This tablet has a front camera resolution of 5 MP which is higher than in 48.8% of tablets and equal to that in 19.6% of tablets.
Main camera aperture
f/2.0
Main camera aperture
f/2.0
â–² Better than 58% of models
This tablet has a main camera aperture of f/2.0 which is wider than that of 57.5% of tablets and equal to that of 24.5% of tablets.
Optical zoom
1xxx
Optical zoom
1xx
â–² Better than 18% of models
This tablet supports 1xx optical zoom which is higher than in 18.4% of tablets and equal to that in 80.7% of tablets.
Show more
Battery capacity
7,040 mAh
Battery capacity
7,040 mAh
â–² Better than 58% of models
Market range: <4k mAh – >10.1k mAh
This tablet has a battery capacity of 7,040 mAh which is larger than the batteries in 57.9% of tablets and equal to those in 2% of tablets.
Charging speed
15 W
Charging speed
15 W
â–¼ Worse than 52% of models
Market range: <10 W – >60 W
This tablet supports charging speeds of 15 W which is slower than in 52.2% of tablets and equal to speeds in 6.3% of tablets.
Battery life
12 hours
Battery life
12 hours
â–² Better than 66% of models
Market range: <6 hours – >16 hours
This tablet has a battery life of 12 hours, which is longer than that of 65.7% of tablets and equal to that of 9.3% of tablets.
Wireless charging
no
Wireless charging
no
â–¼ Worse than 2% of models
This tablet does not support wireless charging. 1.5% of tablets support wireless charging.
Fast charging
yes
Fast charging
yes
â–² Better than 50% of models
This tablet supports fast charging. 50.4% of tablets support fast charging.
Show more
LTE support
yes
LTE support
yes
â–² Better than 37% of models
This tablet supports LTE. 36.8% of tablets include LTE connectivity.
Wi-Fi connectivity
yes
Wi-Fi connectivity
yes
Category Benchmark
This tablet supports Wi-Fi connectivity. 0.2% of tablets offer Wi-Fi support.
GPS
yes
GPS
yes
â–² Better than 17% of models
This tablet supports GPS. 17.3% of tablets include GPS functionality.
5G connectivity
no
5G connectivity
no
â–¼ Worse than 11% of models
This tablet does not support 5G connectivity. 11.1% of tablets support 5G.
NFC
no
NFC
no
â–¼ Worse than 11% of models
This tablet does not support NFC. 10.9% of tablets support NFC.
Show more
Operating system
Android
Operating system
Android
â–² Better than 23% of models
This tablet uses the Android operating system, which is more advanced than the one used by 23.3%.
Update support duration
medium
Update support duration
medium
â–² Better than 47% of models
This tablet offers medium update support, which is longer than the support period of 47.3% of tablets and equal to that of 32.6% of tablets.
Direct OS updates
no
Direct OS updates
no
â–¼ Worse than 80% of models
This tablet does not receive direct OS updates. 79.7% of tablets receive direct updates.
On-device AI
no
On-device AI
no
â–¼ Worse than 28% of models
This tablet does not support on-device AI. 28.3% of tablets support this capability.
App tracking protection
no
App tracking protection
no
â–¼ Worse than 28% of models
This tablet does not include app tracking protection. 28.3% of tablets include app tracking protection.
Show more
IP rating
not rated
IP rating
not rated
â–¼ Worse than 16% of models
This tablet has an IP rating of not rated which is lower than that of 16.3% of tablets and equal to that of 83.7% of tablets.
Weight
508 g
Weight
508 g
â–¼ Worse than 55% of models
Market range: <315 g – >730 g
This tablet weighs 508 g which is heavier than 55.4% of tablets and equal to the weight of 0.4% of tablets.
Backlit keyboard
no
Backlit keyboard
no
â–¼ Worse than 10% of models
This tablet does not support a backlit keyboard. 9.8% of tablets support backlit keyboards.
Keyboard accessory
yes
Keyboard accessory
yes
â–² Better than 16% of models
This tablet supports a keyboard accessory. 15.8% of tablets support this option.
Pen latency
N/A
Show more
Number of microphones
?
aptX Adaptive
no
aptX Adaptive
no
â–¼ Worse than 7% of models
This tablet does not support aptX Adaptive. 6.9% of tablets offer this codec.
Dolby Atmos support
yes
Dolby Atmos support
yes
â–² Better than 69% of models
This tablet supports Dolby Atmos. 68.6% of tablets support Dolby Atmos.
N. of speakers
4
N. of speakers
4
â–² Better than 71% of models
Market range: <1 – >6
This tablet includes 4 speakers, which is more than in 70.9% of tablets and equal to the number in 22.7% of tablets.
FM radio
no
FM radio
no
â–¼ Worse than 19% of models
This tablet does not include an FM radio. 19% of tablets offer FM radio functionality.
Show more

Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 10.5 LTE (3GB + 32GB) vs the average tablet

246810TotalPerformanceDisplayCameraBatteryConnectivitySoftware & FeaturesDesignAudio & Multimedia
  • Supports fast charging
    Fast charging
    yes
    â–² Better than 50% of models
    This tablet supports fast charging, the average tablet does not. 49.7% of tablets feature fast charging.
  • 2 more speakers
    N. of speakers
    4
    â–² Better than 71% of models
    Market range: <1 – >6
    This tablet has more speakers than the average tablet (4 vs 2). The average tablet has 2 speakers.
    4 vs 2
  • 2 hours longer battery life
    Battery life
    12 hours
    â–² Better than 66% of models
    Market range: <6 hours – >16 hours
    This tablet offers longer battery life than the average tablet (12 hours vs 10 hours). The average tablet offers 10 hours of battery life.
    12 hours vs 10 hours
  • Wider front camera aperture
    Front camera aperture
    f/2.0
    â–² Better than 73% of models
    This tablet has a better front camera aperture than the average tablet (f/2 vs f/2.2). The average tablet uses f/2.2 front camera aperture.
    f/2.0 vs f/2.2
  • Includes battery health monitoring
    Battery health monitoring
    yes
    â–² Better than 63% of models
    This tablet features battery health monitoring, the average tablet does not. 37% of tablets include battery health tools.
  • Allows manual ISO
    Manual ISO
    yes
    â–² Better than 54% of models
    This tablet allows manual ISO adjustment, the average tablet does not. 46% of tablets feature manual ISO.
  • More capable chipset
    Chipset
    Unisoc Tiger T618
    â–¼ Worse than 62% of models
    This tablet uses the Unisoc Tiger T618 chipset, while the average tablet uses MediaTek MT8169A.
    Unisoc Tiger T618 vs MediaTek MT8169A
  • Supports Dolby Atmos
    Dolby Atmos support
    yes
    â–² Better than 69% of models
    This tablet supports Dolby Atmos, the average tablet does not. 31.5% of tablets support Dolby Atmos.
  • More capable chipset
    Chipset
    Unisoc Tiger T618
    â–¼ Worse than 62% of models
    This tablet uses the Unisoc Tiger T618 chipset, while the average tablet uses MediaTek MT8169A.
    Unisoc Tiger T618 vs MediaTek MT8169A
  • Newer DDR memory version
    DDR memory version
    LPDDR4X
    â–² Better than 54% of models
    This tablet supports a newer DDR version than the average tablet (LPDDR4X vs LPDDR3). The average DDR version is LPDDR3.
    LPDDR4X vs LPDDR3
  • 2 more CPU threads
    CPU threads
    8
    â–² Better than 50% of models
    Market range: <2 – >12
    This tablet has more CPU threads than the average tablet (8 vs 6). The average tablet has 6 CPU threads.
    8 vs 6
  • 30.8% faster GPU clock
    GPU frequency
    850 MHz
    â–² Better than 71% of models
    Market range: <311 MHz – >1.1k MHz
    This tablet has a higher GPU frequency than the average tablet (850 MHz vs 650 MHz). The average tablet has GPU frequency of 650 MHz.
    850 MHz vs 650 MHz
  • 0.4 inches larger screen size
    Screen size
    10.5 inches
    â–² Better than 63% of models
    Market range: <7 inches – >12 inches
    This tablet has a higher screen size than the average tablet (10.5 inches vs 10.1 inches). The average tablet has screen size of 10.1 inches.
    10.5 inches vs 10.1 inches
  • Wider front camera aperture
    Front camera aperture
    f/2.0
    â–² Better than 73% of models
    This tablet has a better front camera aperture than the average tablet (f/2 vs f/2.2). The average tablet uses f/2.2 front camera aperture.
    f/2.0 vs f/2.2
  • Allows manual ISO
    Manual ISO
    yes
    â–² Better than 54% of models
    This tablet allows manual ISO adjustment, the average tablet does not. 46% of tablets feature manual ISO.
  • Wider main camera aperture
    Main camera aperture
    f/2.0
    â–² Better than 58% of models
    This tablet has a better main camera aperture than the average tablet (f/2 vs f/2.2). The average tablet uses f/2.2 main camera aperture.
    f/2.0 vs f/2.2
  • Supports fast charging
    Fast charging
    yes
    â–² Better than 50% of models
    This tablet supports fast charging, the average tablet does not. 49.7% of tablets feature fast charging.
  • 2 hours longer battery life
    Battery life
    12 hours
    â–² Better than 66% of models
    Market range: <6 hours – >16 hours
    This tablet offers longer battery life than the average tablet (12 hours vs 10 hours). The average tablet offers 10 hours of battery life.
    12 hours vs 10 hours
  • Includes battery health monitoring
    Battery health monitoring
    yes
    â–² Better than 63% of models
    This tablet features battery health monitoring, the average tablet does not. 37% of tablets include battery health tools.
  • 7% larger battery capacity
    Battery capacity
    7,040 mAh
    â–² Better than 58% of models
    Market range: <4k mAh – >10.1k mAh
    This tablet has a higher battery capacity than the average tablet (7040 mAh vs 6580 mAh). The average tablet battery has capacity of 6580 mAh.
    7,040 mAh vs 6,580 mAh
  • Supports live text recognition
    Live text recognition
    yes
    â–² Better than 65% of models
    This tablet supports live text recognition, the average tablet does not. 34.9% of tablets can recognize text from images.
  • Allows app offloading
    App offloading
    yes
    â–² Better than 74% of models
    This tablet allows app offloading, the average tablet does not. 26.4% of tablets support app offloading.
  • Supports dynamic theme
    Dynamic theme
    yes
    â–² Better than 71% of models
    This tablet features dynamic themes, the average tablet does not. 29% of tablets offer dynamic theming.
  • Includes clipboard warnings
    Clipboard warnings
    yes
    â–² Better than 60% of models
    This tablet has clipboard warnings, the average tablet does not. 39.9% of tablets include clipboard warnings.
  • 1.1 mm thinner
    Thickness
    6.9 mm
    â–² Better than 77% of models
    Market range: <6.1 mm – >11.5 mm
    This tablet is thinner than the average tablet (6.9 mm vs 8 mm). The average tablet is 8.0 mm thick.
    6.9 mm vs 8.0 mm
  • Designed for kids
    Designed for kids
    yes
    â–² Better than 76% of models
    This tablet is suitable for kids, the average tablet is not. 23.7% of tablets are suitable for kids.
  • 38.1 mm shorter
    Width
    161.9 mm
    â–² Better than 67% of models
    Market range: <123.8 mm – >274 mm
    This tablet is shorter than the average tablet (161.9 mm vs 200 mm). The average tablet is 200.0 mm tall.
    161.9 mm vs 200.0 mm
  • 2 more speakers
    N. of speakers
    4
    â–² Better than 71% of models
    Market range: <1 – >6
    This tablet has more speakers than the average tablet (4 vs 2). The average tablet has 2 speakers.
    4 vs 2
  • Supports Dolby Atmos
    Dolby Atmos support
    yes
    â–² Better than 69% of models
    This tablet supports Dolby Atmos, the average tablet does not. 31.5% of tablets support Dolby Atmos.
  • Inferior display type
    Display type
    TFT LCD
    â–¼ Worse than 90% of models
    This tablet has an inferior display type compared to the average tablet (TFT LCD vs IPS LCD). 0.00% of tablets use the superior display type.
    TFT LCD vs IPS LCD
  • Does not receive direct OS updates
    Direct OS updates
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 80% of models
    This tablet does not support direct OS updates, the average tablet does. 79.7% of tablets support direct OS updates.
  • 74 nits lower peak brightness
    Peak brightness
    327 nits
    â–¼ Worse than 88% of models
    Market range: <320 nits – >750 nits
    This tablet has a lower peak brightness than the average tablet (327 nits vs 401 nits). The average tablet reaches 401 nits peak brightness.
    327 nits vs 401 nits
  • Lower contrast ratio
    Contrast ratio
    608:1
    â–¼ Worse than 97% of models
    This tablet has a lower contrast ratio than the average tablet (608:1 vs 1015:1). The average tablet has a contrast ratio of 1015:1.
    608:1 vs 1,015:1
  • No BSI sensor
    BSI sensor
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 53% of models
    This tablet lacks a BSI sensor, the average tablet has one. 52.6% of tablets use BSI sensors for better low-light shots.
  • 1 GB less RAM
    RAM capacity
    3 GB
    â–¼ Worse than 52% of models
    Market range: <2 GB – >12 GB
    This tablet has less RAM capacity than the average tablet (3 GB vs 4 GB). The average tablet has 4 GB of RAM.
    3 GB vs 4 GB
  • 50% less storage
    Internal storage
    32 GB
    â–¼ Worse than 60% of models
    Market range: <0 GB – >250 GB
    This tablet has less internal storage than the average tablet (32 GB vs 64 GB). The average tablet provides 64 GB of internal storage.
    32 GB vs 64 GB
  • No HDMI output
    HDMI output
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 50% of models
    This tablet does not have an HDMI output, the average tablet does. 50.1% of tablets support HDMI output.
  • 4.81x less popular
    Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 10.5 LTE (3GB + 32GB) is less popular than the average tablet (1 vs 4.8).
    1 vs 4.81
  • 50% less storage
    Internal storage
    32 GB
    â–¼ Worse than 60% of models
    Market range: <0 GB – >250 GB
    This tablet has less internal storage than the average tablet (32 GB vs 64 GB). The average tablet provides 64 GB of internal storage.
    32 GB vs 64 GB
  • 1 GB less RAM
    RAM capacity
    3 GB
    â–¼ Worse than 52% of models
    Market range: <2 GB – >12 GB
    This tablet has less RAM capacity than the average tablet (3 GB vs 4 GB). The average tablet has 4 GB of RAM.
    3 GB vs 4 GB
  • 26.2% lower Geekbench 6 multi-core benchmark score
    Geekbench 6 multi-core benchmark score
    1,396 points
    â–¼ Worse than 65% of models
    Market range: <725 points – >6.8k points
    This tablet achieves a lower Geekbench 6 multi-core benchmark score than the average tablet (1396 points vs 1891 points). The average tablet scores 1891 points in Geekbench 6 multi-core.
    1,396 points vs 1,891 points
  • 39.9% lower Geekbench 6 single-core benchmark score
    Geekbench 6 single-core benchmark score
    438 points
    â–¼ Worse than 62% of models
    Market range: <233 points – >2.3k points
    This tablet achieves a lower Geekbench 6 single-core benchmark score than the average tablet (438 points vs 729 points). The average tablet scores 729 points in Geekbench 6 single-core.
    438 points vs 729 points
  • Inferior display type
    Display type
    TFT LCD
    â–¼ Worse than 90% of models
    This tablet has an inferior display type compared to the average tablet (TFT LCD vs IPS LCD). 0.00% of tablets use the superior display type.
    TFT LCD vs IPS LCD
  • 74 nits lower peak brightness
    Peak brightness
    327 nits
    â–¼ Worse than 88% of models
    Market range: <320 nits – >750 nits
    This tablet has a lower peak brightness than the average tablet (327 nits vs 401 nits). The average tablet reaches 401 nits peak brightness.
    327 nits vs 401 nits
  • Lower contrast ratio
    Contrast ratio
    608:1
    â–¼ Worse than 97% of models
    This tablet has a lower contrast ratio than the average tablet (608:1 vs 1015:1). The average tablet has a contrast ratio of 1015:1.
    608:1 vs 1,015:1
  • 3.6% lower pixel density
    Pixel density
    216 ppi
    â–¼ Worse than 52% of models
    Market range: <149 ppi – >291 ppi
    This tablet has a lower pixel density than the average tablet (216 ppi vs 224 ppi). The average tablet has pixel density of 224 ppi.
    216 ppi vs 224 ppi
  • No BSI sensor
    BSI sensor
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 53% of models
    This tablet lacks a BSI sensor, the average tablet has one. 52.6% of tablets use BSI sensors for better low-light shots.
  • 16.7% slower charging speed
    Charging speed
    15 W
    â–¼ Worse than 52% of models
    Market range: <10 W – >60 W
    This tablet supports slower charging than the average tablet (15 W vs 18 W). The average tablet supports charging speed of 18 W.
    15 W vs 18 W
  • No HDMI output
    HDMI output
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 50% of models
    This tablet does not have an HDMI output, the average tablet does. 50.1% of tablets support HDMI output.
  • Does not receive direct OS updates
    Direct OS updates
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 80% of models
    This tablet does not support direct OS updates, the average tablet does. 79.7% of tablets support direct OS updates.

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

C
cameratim.com
19/06/2025
Summary of the review
Review of Galaxy Samsung Tab A8 (SM-X200) tablet
P
pocket-lint.com
01/11/2023
Summary of the review
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 review: Just about enough, never more
T
techradar.com
13/04/2023
Summary of the review
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 review: budget tablet with a beautiful screen
A
androidauthority.com
08/09/2024
Summary of the review
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 review: Budget streaming star
G
gadgetbytenepal.com
01/02/2022
Summary of the review
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 Review: Good Enough in 2022?
T
trustedreviews.com
29/06/2022
Summary of the review
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 Review
T
techadvisor.com
26/04/2022
Summary of the review
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 Review: Almost Budget Brilliance
H
hitechcentury.com
15/02/2022
Summary of the review
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 Review – Big Tablet, Awesome Value
H
heise.de
22/11/2023
Summary of the review
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 im Test: Sehr gutes Tablet für unter 200 Euro(www.computerbild.de) | 11.02.2022 | Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 im Test: Besser als der...
(Translated)Show original
C
chip.de
05/06/2023
Summary of the review
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 im Test
(Translated)Show original
N
notebookcheck.com
11/05/2024
Summary of the review
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022 - Notebookcheck.com Externe Tests
(Translated)Show original
E
eu.community.samsung.com
20/07/2023
Summary of the review
Mon test complet de la Galaxy Tab A8! - Samsung Community Souhaitez-vous des précisions sur les différences de performances entre la version Wi-Fi et...
(Translated)Show original
C
cnetfrance.fr
04/03/2022
Summary of the review
Test de la Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2021: une bonne tablette...(www.frandroid.com) | 08 février 2022 | Test de la Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 (2021): l'efficac...
(Translated)Show original
L
lesnumeriques.com
29/01/2022
Summary of the review
Test Samsung Galaxy Tab A8: une mise à jour sans excès de zèle
(Translated)Show original
P
phonandroid.com
28/01/2022
Summary of the review
Test Samsung Galaxy Tab A8: une tablette abordable qui accumule les défauts
(Translated)Show original
N
notebookcheck.biz
21/02/2022
Summary of the review
Test de la Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 LTE (2022) : tablette polyvalente pour moins de 300 euros
(Translated)Show original
L
lesnumeriques.com
11/01/2023
Summary of the review
Duel de tablettes : Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 vs Xiaomi Redmi Pad
(Translated)Show original
F
frandroid.com
15/12/2021
Summary of the review
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 (2021) : Caractéristiques, prix et actualités
(Translated)Show original
T
tweakers.net
15/04/2024
Summary of the review
Grondige en onafhankelijke Samsung Galaxy Tab A8-reviews
(Translated)Show original
N
notebookcheck.nl
21/02/2022
Summary of the review
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 LTE (2022) tablet review: Een krachtige allrounder voor beduidend minder dan 300
(Translated)Show original
T
tweakers.net
17/10/2022
Summary of the review
Tablet Best Buy Guide - Oktober 2022 (Testresultaten inclusief 4G/LTE variant)
(Translated)Show original

Verdict

The Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 10.5 LTE (3GB + 32GB) is an affordable, entry-level tablet featuring a 10.5-inch TFT LCD display with a 1920 x 1200 (WUXGA) resolution and an immersive 16:10 aspect ratio. Powered by an octa-core Unisoc Tiger T618 processor with 3GB of RAM and 32GB of internal storage, it supports LTE cellular connectivity and expandable memory up to 1TB via microSD. Key characteristics include a sleek 6.9mm slim metal body, a quad-speaker system with Dolby Atmos for superior audio, and a long-lasting 7,040mAh battery. Main pros include its premium build quality, excellent sound performance for media streaming, and reliable battery life. However, notable cons include slow 15W charging times, underwhelming 8MP rear and 5MP front cameras, and occasional performance lag in more demanding apps or games due to limited RAM.

Compare Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 10.5 LTE (3GB + 32GB) with other tablets

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 10.5 LTE (3GB + 32GB) and other tablets

No results found