OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS
Scored using Tablets Methodology v1.0
Tablets Methodology v1.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are evaluated mathematically under Frontumo Tablets Methodology v1.0 using verified laboratory benchmarks, technical specifications, and authentic consumer ratings with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Tablets Methodology v1.0

Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 WiFi (4GB + 64GB) Review | 168 Data compared

Avg. price:~£230RAM capacity:3 GBInternal storage:64 GBScreen size:10.4 inchesChipset:Qualcomm Snapdragon 662

Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 WiFi (4GB + 64GB) Review: Compare 168 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Tablets category and whether it is worth buying.

6.7

Overall score

Score
6.7/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the smartphone's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best Tablets on the market.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 62% of models
Score components

90%

6.4

Technical score

10%

9.4

User score

â–²Better than 62% of tablets
6.4

Technical score

Technical score
6.4/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of the smartphone's technical performance, covering eight key areas: performance & hardware, software, camera, connectivity, display, battery, audio, and design.
When it matters
When you want to compare Tablets based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 58% of models
Score components

22%

5.9

Performance

20%

4.9

Display

16%

6.9

Camera

14%

7.0

Battery

12%

7.3

Connectivity

8%

7.9

Software & Features

5%

6.2

Design

3%

8.9

Audio & Multimedia

â–²Better than 58% of tablets
9.4

User score

User score
9.4/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the smartphone
When it matters
When you want to know how a smartphone handles daily tasks and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
★ Better than 96% of models
Score components

70%

9.2

User ratings

30%

10

Number of reviews

No reviews for this version.

Check reviews from other versions.

★Better than 96% of tablets
  • No image
No image

Best prices

    N/A~ £230

Best rankings

Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Available versions:
3GB + 32GBCheck price3GB + 64GBCheck price
Other versions:
4GB + 64GB
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of tablet Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 WiFi (4GB + 64GB)

Technical score
Technical score
6.4/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of the smartphone's technical performance, covering eight key areas: performance & hardware, software, camera, connectivity, display, battery, audio, and design.
When it matters
When you want to compare Tablets based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 58% of models
Score components:

22%

5.9

Performance

20%

4.9

Display

16%

6.9

Camera

14%

7.0

Battery

12%

7.3

Connectivity

8%

7.9

Software & Features

5%

6.2

Design

3%

8.9

Audio & Multimedia

6.4
User score
User score
9.4/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the smartphone
When it matters
When you want to know how a smartphone handles daily tasks and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
★ Better than 96% of models
Score components

70%

9.2

User ratings

30%

10

Number of reviews

No reviews for this version.

Check reviews from other versions.

9.4
Popularity
Popularity
10.0/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the smartphone.
When it matters
When you prefer to purchase a product chosen and reviewed by many other consumers.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
★ Better than 92% of models
Popularity:
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 WiFi (4GB + 64GB) has a user popularity of 10 points, which is lower than 91.8% of Tablets.
10
Value for money
Value for money
7.5/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the smartphone's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a smartphone with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 64% of models
Score components:

60%

6.7

Overall score

40%

9.3

Price

7.5
RAM capacity
3 GB
RAM capacity
3 GB
â–¼ Worse than 52% of models
Market range: <2 GB – >12 GB
This tablet has a RAM capacity of 3 GB which is smaller than the RAM capacity of 52.4% of tablets and equal to that of 8.5% of tablets.
Process node
11 nm
Process node
11 nm
â–² Better than 67% of models
Market range: <4 nm – >40 nm
This tablet is built on a 11 nm process node, which is smaller than the node size used in 67.3% of tablets and equal to the node used in 0.6% of tablets.
Internal storage
64 GB
Internal storage
64 GB
â–¼ Worse than 43% of models
Market range: <0 GB – >250 GB
This tablet has an internal storage capacity of 64 GB which is larger than the storage of 39.5% of tablets and equal to that of 17.1% of tablets.
Geekbench 6 single-core benchmark score
339 points
Geekbench 6 single-core benchmark score
339 points
â–¼ Worse than 78% of models
Market range: <233 points – >2.3k points
This tablet scored 339 points in Geekbench 6 (single-core) which is lower than the score of 77.7% of tablets and equal to the score of 1.3% of tablets.
Chipset
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662
Chipset
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662
â–² Better than 58% of models
This tablet uses the Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 chipset, which is more advanced than the chipsets in 57.8% of tablets and equal to those in 0.5% of tablets.
Show more
Screen resolution
2000×1200
Screen resolution
2000×1200
â–² Better than 58% of models
This tablet has a screen resolution of 2000×1200 which is higher than that of 58.2% of tablets and equal to that of 8.2% of tablets.
Refresh rate
60 Hz
Refresh rate
60 Hz
â–¼ Worse than 26% of models
Market range: <60 Hz – >120 Hz
This tablet supports a refresh rate of 60 Hz which is equal to that in 73.8% of tablets.
Display type
TFT LCD
Display type
TFT LCD
â–¼ Worse than 90% of models
This tablet uses a TFT LCD display type. 89.9% of tablets use this display technology.
Pixel density
224 ppi
Pixel density
224 ppi
â–² Better than 50% of models
Market range: <149 ppi – >291 ppi
This tablet has a pixel density of 224 ppi which is higher than that of 50% of tablets and equal to that of 11.6% of tablets.
Display glass type
?
Show more
Optical image stabilization
no
Optical image stabilization
no
Category Benchmark
This tablet does not support optical image stabilization. 0.4% of tablets include OIS.
Main camera megapixels
8 MP
Main camera megapixels
8 MP
â–² Better than 37% of models
Market range: <3.15 MP – >13 MP
This tablet has a main camera resolution of 8 MP which is higher than that of 36.5% of tablets and equal to that of 31.8% of tablets.
Front camera megapixels
5 MP
Front camera megapixels
5 MP
â–² Better than 49% of models
Market range: <1.2 MP – >9 MP
This tablet has a front camera resolution of 5 MP which is higher than in 48.8% of tablets and equal to that in 19.6% of tablets.
Main camera aperture
f/2.0
Main camera aperture
f/2.0
â–² Better than 58% of models
This tablet has a main camera aperture of f/2.0 which is wider than that of 57.5% of tablets and equal to that of 24.5% of tablets.
Optical zoom
1xxx
Optical zoom
1xx
â–² Better than 18% of models
This tablet supports 1xx optical zoom which is higher than in 18.4% of tablets and equal to that in 80.7% of tablets.
Show more
Battery capacity
6,820 mAh
Battery capacity
6,820 mAh
â–² Better than 53% of models
Market range: <4k mAh – >10.1k mAh
This tablet has a battery capacity of 6,820 mAh which is larger than the batteries in 53.3% of tablets and equal to those in 0.1% of tablets.
Charging speed
15 W
Charging speed
15 W
â–¼ Worse than 52% of models
Market range: <10 W – >60 W
This tablet supports charging speeds of 15 W which is slower than in 52.2% of tablets and equal to speeds in 6.3% of tablets.
Battery life
13 hours
Battery life
13 hours
â–² Better than 76% of models
Market range: <6 hours – >16 hours
This tablet has a battery life of 13 hours, which is longer than that of 76.1% of tablets and equal to that of 4.9% of tablets.
web browsing
Wireless charging
no
Wireless charging
no
â–¼ Worse than 2% of models
This tablet does not support wireless charging. 1.5% of tablets support wireless charging.
Fast charging
yes
Fast charging
yes
â–² Better than 50% of models
This tablet supports fast charging. 50.4% of tablets support fast charging.
Show more
LTE support
yes
LTE support
yes
â–² Better than 37% of models
This tablet supports LTE. 36.8% of tablets include LTE connectivity.
Wi-Fi connectivity
yes
Wi-Fi connectivity
yes
Category Benchmark
This tablet supports Wi-Fi connectivity. 0.2% of tablets offer Wi-Fi support.
GPS
yes
GPS
yes
â–² Better than 17% of models
This tablet supports GPS. 17.3% of tablets include GPS functionality.
5G connectivity
no
5G connectivity
no
â–¼ Worse than 11% of models
This tablet does not support 5G connectivity. 11.1% of tablets support 5G.
NFC
no
NFC
no
â–¼ Worse than 11% of models
This tablet does not support NFC. 10.9% of tablets support NFC.
Show more
Operating system
Android
Operating system
Android
â–² Better than 23% of models
This tablet uses the Android operating system, which is more advanced than the one used by 23.3%.
Update support duration
short
Update support duration
short
â–¼ Worse than 53% of models
This tablet offers short update support, which is shorter than the support period of 52.7% of tablets and equal to that of 47.3% of tablets.
Direct OS updates
yes
Direct OS updates
yes
â–² Better than 20% of models
This tablet receives direct OS updates. 20.3% of tablets receive direct updates.
On-device AI
no
On-device AI
no
â–¼ Worse than 28% of models
This tablet does not support on-device AI. 28.3% of tablets support this capability.
App tracking protection
no
App tracking protection
no
â–¼ Worse than 28% of models
This tablet does not include app tracking protection. 28.3% of tablets include app tracking protection.
Show more
IP rating
not rated
IP rating
not rated
â–¼ Worse than 16% of models
This tablet has an IP rating of not rated which is lower than that of 16.3% of tablets and equal to that of 83.7% of tablets.
Weight
476 g
Weight
476 g
â–² Better than 56% of models
Market range: <315 g – >730 g
This tablet weighs 476 g which is lighter than 55.8% of tablets and equal to the weight of 0.1% of tablets.
Backlit keyboard
no
Backlit keyboard
no
â–¼ Worse than 10% of models
This tablet does not support a backlit keyboard. 9.8% of tablets support backlit keyboards.
Keyboard accessory
yes
Keyboard accessory
yes
â–² Better than 16% of models
This tablet supports a keyboard accessory. 15.8% of tablets support this option.
Pen latency
N/A
Show more
Number of microphones
?
aptX Adaptive
no
aptX Adaptive
no
â–¼ Worse than 7% of models
This tablet does not support aptX Adaptive. 6.9% of tablets offer this codec.
Dolby Atmos support
yes
Dolby Atmos support
yes
â–² Better than 69% of models
This tablet supports Dolby Atmos. 68.6% of tablets support Dolby Atmos.
N. of speakers
4
N. of speakers
4
â–² Better than 71% of models
Market range: <1 – >6
This tablet includes 4 speakers, which is more than in 70.9% of tablets and equal to the number in 22.7% of tablets.
FM radio
no
FM radio
no
â–¼ Worse than 19% of models
This tablet does not include an FM radio. 19% of tablets offer FM radio functionality.
Show more

Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 WiFi (4GB + 64GB) vs the average tablet

246810TotalPerformanceDisplayCameraBatteryConnectivitySoftware & FeaturesDesignAudio & Multimedia
  • 3 hours longer battery life
    Battery life
    13 hours
    â–² Better than 76% of models
    Market range: <6 hours – >16 hours
    This tablet offers longer battery life than the average tablet (13 hours vs 10 hours). The average tablet offers 10 hours of battery life.
    web browsing
    13 hours vs 10 hours
  • More capable chipset
    Chipset
    Qualcomm Snapdragon 662
    â–² Better than 58% of models
    This tablet uses the Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 chipset, while the average tablet uses MediaTek MT8169A.
    Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 vs MediaTek MT8169A
  • Better GPU
    GPU model
    Adreno 610
    â–² Better than 80% of models
    This tablet uses the Adreno 610 GPU, while the average tablet uses Mali-G51. GPU choice is one of the main performance differences between tablets.
    Adreno 610 vs Mali-G51
  • Higher contrast ratio
    Contrast ratio
    1730:1
    â–² Better than 86% of models
    This tablet has a higher contrast ratio than the average tablet (1730:1 vs 1015:1). The average tablet contrast ratio is 1015:1.
    1,730:1 vs 1,015:1
  • Supports fast charging
    Fast charging
    yes
    â–² Better than 50% of models
    This tablet supports fast charging, the average tablet does not. 49.7% of tablets feature fast charging.
  • 2 more speakers
    N. of speakers
    4
    â–² Better than 71% of models
    Market range: <1 – >6
    This tablet has more speakers than the average tablet (4 vs 2). The average tablet has 2 speakers.
    4 vs 2
  • Includes battery health monitoring
    Battery health monitoring
    yes
    â–² Better than 63% of models
    This tablet features battery health monitoring, the average tablet does not. 37% of tablets include battery health tools.
  • Allows manual ISO
    Manual ISO
    yes
    â–² Better than 54% of models
    This tablet allows manual ISO adjustment, the average tablet does not. 46% of tablets feature manual ISO.
  • 18% higher user score
    User score
    9.4/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the smartphone
    When it matters
    When you want to know how a smartphone handles daily tasks and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
    Score distribution
    â–¼
    â–¼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 WiFi
    the average tablet
    Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 WiFi (4GB + 64GB) has a higher user score than the average tablet (9.44 vs 8.000).
    9.44 vs 8
  • 2.08x more popular
    Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 WiFi (4GB + 64GB) is more popular than the average tablet (10 vs 4.8).
    10 vs 4.81
  • More capable chipset
    Chipset
    Qualcomm Snapdragon 662
    â–² Better than 58% of models
    This tablet uses the Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 chipset, while the average tablet uses MediaTek MT8169A.
    Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 vs MediaTek MT8169A
  • Better GPU
    GPU model
    Adreno 610
    â–² Better than 80% of models
    This tablet uses the Adreno 610 GPU, while the average tablet uses Mali-G51. GPU choice is one of the main performance differences between tablets.
    Adreno 610 vs Mali-G51
  • Newer DDR memory version
    DDR memory version
    LPDDR4X
    â–² Better than 54% of models
    This tablet supports a newer DDR version than the average tablet (LPDDR4X vs LPDDR3). The average DDR version is LPDDR3.
    LPDDR4X vs LPDDR3
  • 2 more CPU threads
    CPU threads
    8
    â–² Better than 50% of models
    Market range: <2 – >12
    This tablet has more CPU threads than the average tablet (8 vs 6). The average tablet has 6 CPU threads.
    8 vs 6
  • 46.2% faster GPU clock
    GPU frequency
    950 MHz
    â–² Better than 77% of models
    Market range: <311 MHz – >1.1k MHz
    This tablet has a higher GPU frequency than the average tablet (950 MHz vs 650 MHz). The average tablet has GPU frequency of 650 MHz.
    950 MHz vs 650 MHz
  • 21.4% smaller process node
    Process node
    11 nm
    â–² Better than 67% of models
    Market range: <4 nm – >40 nm
    This tablet uses a smaller process node than the average tablet (11 nm vs 14 nm). The average tablet uses a process node of 14 nm.
    11 nm vs 14 nm
  • Higher contrast ratio
    Contrast ratio
    1730:1
    â–² Better than 86% of models
    This tablet has a higher contrast ratio than the average tablet (1730:1 vs 1015:1). The average tablet contrast ratio is 1015:1.
    1,730:1 vs 1,015:1
  • 0.3 inches larger screen size
    Screen size
    10.4 inches
    â–² Better than 61% of models
    Market range: <7 inches – >12 inches
    This tablet has a higher screen size than the average tablet (10.4 inches vs 10.1 inches). The average tablet has screen size of 10.1 inches.
    10.4 inches vs 10.1 inches
  • Higher screen resolution
    Screen resolution
    2000×1200
    â–² Better than 58% of models
    This tablet has a higher screen resolution than the average tablet (2000×1200 vs 1920×1200). The average tablet resolution is 1920×1200.
    2000×1200 vs 1920×1200
  • Allows manual ISO
    Manual ISO
    yes
    â–² Better than 54% of models
    This tablet allows manual ISO adjustment, the average tablet does not. 46% of tablets feature manual ISO.
  • Wider main camera aperture
    Main camera aperture
    f/2.0
    â–² Better than 58% of models
    This tablet has a better main camera aperture than the average tablet (f/2 vs f/2.2). The average tablet uses f/2.2 main camera aperture.
    f/2.0 vs f/2.2
  • 3 hours longer battery life
    Battery life
    13 hours
    â–² Better than 76% of models
    Market range: <6 hours – >16 hours
    This tablet offers longer battery life than the average tablet (13 hours vs 10 hours). The average tablet offers 10 hours of battery life.
    web browsing
    13 hours vs 10 hours
  • Supports fast charging
    Fast charging
    yes
    â–² Better than 50% of models
    This tablet supports fast charging, the average tablet does not. 49.7% of tablets feature fast charging.
  • Includes battery health monitoring
    Battery health monitoring
    yes
    â–² Better than 63% of models
    This tablet features battery health monitoring, the average tablet does not. 37% of tablets include battery health tools.
  • Supports dynamic theme
    Dynamic theme
    yes
    â–² Better than 71% of models
    This tablet features dynamic themes, the average tablet does not. 29% of tablets offer dynamic theming.
  • Supports extra dim mode
    Extra dim mode
    yes
    â–² Better than 65% of models
    This tablet features extra dim mode, the average tablet does not. 35.4% of tablets support extra diming.
  • Includes clipboard warnings
    Clipboard warnings
    yes
    â–² Better than 60% of models
    This tablet has clipboard warnings, the average tablet does not. 39.9% of tablets include clipboard warnings.
  • 1 mm thinner
    Thickness
    7 mm
    â–² Better than 74% of models
    Market range: <6.1 mm – >11.5 mm
    This tablet is thinner than the average tablet (7 mm vs 8 mm). The average tablet is 8.0 mm thick.
    7 mm vs 8.0 mm
  • 42.6 mm shorter
    Width
    157.4 mm
    â–¼ Worse than 78% of models
    Market range: <123.8 mm – >274 mm
    This tablet is shorter than the average tablet (157.4 mm vs 200 mm). The average tablet is 200.0 mm tall.
    157.4 mm vs 200.0 mm
  • 2 more speakers
    N. of speakers
    4
    â–² Better than 71% of models
    Market range: <1 – >6
    This tablet has more speakers than the average tablet (4 vs 2). The average tablet has 2 speakers.
    4 vs 2
  • Supports Dolby Atmos
    Dolby Atmos support
    yes
    â–² Better than 69% of models
    This tablet supports Dolby Atmos, the average tablet does not. 31.5% of tablets support Dolby Atmos.
  • Supports LDAC
    LDAC support
    yes
    â–² Better than 75% of models
    This tablet supports LDAC, the average tablet does not. 25.2% of tablets support LDAC.
  • Inferior display type
    Display type
    TFT LCD
    â–¼ Worse than 90% of models
    This tablet has an inferior display type compared to the average tablet (TFT LCD vs IPS LCD). 0.00% of tablets use the superior display type.
    TFT LCD vs IPS LCD
  • Shorter update support
    Update support duration
    short
    â–¼ Worse than 53% of models
    This tablet offers shorter update support than the average tablet (short vs medium). The average tablet gets medium of update support.
    short vs medium
  • Narrower front camera aperture
    Front camera aperture
    f/2.4
    â–¼ Worse than 70% of models
    This tablet has a worse front camera aperture than the average tablet (f/2.4 vs f/2.2). The average tablet uses f/2.2 front camera aperture.
    f/2.4 vs f/2.2
  • No touch autofocus
    Touch autofocus
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 83% of models
    This tablet does not support touch autofocus, the average tablet does. 82.8% of tablets allow touch-to-focus.
  • 71 nits lower typical brightness
    Typical brightness
    329 nits
    â–¼ Worse than 83% of models
    Market range: <300 nits – >600 nits
    This tablet has a lower typical brightness than the average tablet (329 nits vs 400 nits). The average tablet reaches 400 nits typical brightness.
    329 nits vs 400 nits
  • 41 nits lower peak brightness
    Peak brightness
    360 nits
    â–¼ Worse than 75% of models
    Market range: <320 nits – >750 nits
    This tablet has a lower peak brightness than the average tablet (360 nits vs 401 nits). The average tablet reaches 401 nits peak brightness.
    360 nits vs 401 nits
  • 53.5% lower Geekbench 6 single-core benchmark score
    Geekbench 6 single-core benchmark score
    339 points
    â–¼ Worse than 78% of models
    Market range: <233 points – >2.3k points
    This tablet achieves a lower Geekbench 6 single-core benchmark score than the average tablet (339 points vs 729 points). The average tablet scores 729 points in Geekbench 6 single-core.
    339 points vs 729 points
  • 36.1% lower Geekbench 6 multi-core benchmark score
    Geekbench 6 multi-core benchmark score
    1,208 points
    â–¼ Worse than 76% of models
    Market range: <725 points – >6.8k points
    This tablet achieves a lower Geekbench 6 multi-core benchmark score than the average tablet (1208 points vs 1891 points). The average tablet scores 1891 points in Geekbench 6 multi-core.
    1,208 points vs 1,891 points
  • 36.1% lower Geekbench 6 multi-core benchmark score
    Geekbench 6 multi-core benchmark score
    1,208 points
    â–¼ Worse than 76% of models
    Market range: <725 points – >6.8k points
    This tablet achieves a lower Geekbench 6 multi-core benchmark score than the average tablet (1208 points vs 1891 points). The average tablet scores 1891 points in Geekbench 6 multi-core.
    1,208 points vs 1,891 points
  • 53.5% lower Geekbench 6 single-core benchmark score
    Geekbench 6 single-core benchmark score
    339 points
    â–¼ Worse than 78% of models
    Market range: <233 points – >2.3k points
    This tablet achieves a lower Geekbench 6 single-core benchmark score than the average tablet (339 points vs 729 points). The average tablet scores 729 points in Geekbench 6 single-core.
    339 points vs 729 points
  • 1 GB less RAM
    RAM capacity
    3 GB
    â–¼ Worse than 52% of models
    Market range: <2 GB – >12 GB
    This tablet has less RAM capacity than the average tablet (3 GB vs 4 GB). The average tablet has 4 GB of RAM.
    3 GB vs 4 GB
  • 2 fewer GPU execution units
    GPU execution units
    2
    â–¼ Worse than 66% of models
    Market range: <2 – >24
    This tablet has less GPU execution units than the average tablet (2 vs 4). The average tablet has 4 GPU execution units.
    2 vs 4
  • Inferior display type
    Display type
    TFT LCD
    â–¼ Worse than 90% of models
    This tablet has an inferior display type compared to the average tablet (TFT LCD vs IPS LCD). 0.00% of tablets use the superior display type.
    TFT LCD vs IPS LCD
  • 71 nits lower typical brightness
    Typical brightness
    329 nits
    â–¼ Worse than 83% of models
    Market range: <300 nits – >600 nits
    This tablet has a lower typical brightness than the average tablet (329 nits vs 400 nits). The average tablet reaches 400 nits typical brightness.
    329 nits vs 400 nits
  • 41 nits lower peak brightness
    Peak brightness
    360 nits
    â–¼ Worse than 75% of models
    Market range: <320 nits – >750 nits
    This tablet has a lower peak brightness than the average tablet (360 nits vs 401 nits). The average tablet reaches 401 nits peak brightness.
    360 nits vs 401 nits
  • Narrower front camera aperture
    Front camera aperture
    f/2.4
    â–¼ Worse than 70% of models
    This tablet has a worse front camera aperture than the average tablet (f/2.4 vs f/2.2). The average tablet uses f/2.2 front camera aperture.
    f/2.4 vs f/2.2
  • No touch autofocus
    Touch autofocus
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 83% of models
    This tablet does not support touch autofocus, the average tablet does. 82.8% of tablets allow touch-to-focus.
  • No timelapse video
    Timelapse video
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 58% of models
    This tablet does not support timelapse video, the average tablet does. 57.5% of tablets include timelapse modes.
  • 16.7% slower charging speed
    Charging speed
    15 W
    â–¼ Worse than 52% of models
    Market range: <10 W – >60 W
    This tablet supports slower charging than the average tablet (15 W vs 18 W). The average tablet supports charging speed of 18 W.
    15 W vs 18 W
  • No HDMI output
    HDMI output
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 50% of models
    This tablet does not have an HDMI output, the average tablet does. 50.1% of tablets support HDMI output.
  • Shorter update support
    Update support duration
    short
    â–¼ Worse than 53% of models
    This tablet offers shorter update support than the average tablet (short vs medium). The average tablet gets medium of update support.
    short vs medium
  • 72.3 mm wider
    Width
    247.6 mm
    â–¼ Worse than 78% of models
    Market range: <123.8 mm – >274 mm
    This tablet is wider than the average tablet (247.6 mm vs 175.3 mm). The average tablet is 175.3 mm wide.
    247.6 mm vs 175.3 mm

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

S
sypnotix.com
01/04/2021
Summary of the review
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 Review: Binging for a Budget Would you like to compare these results against the newer Galaxy Tab A8 or the smaller A7 Lite vers...
L
laptopmedia.com
30/11/2020
Summary of the review
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 (2020) review - a worthy little brother to the S7
S
sammobile.com
23/09/2021
Summary of the review
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 review: Budget tablet with great stereo sound
T
trustedreviews.com
27/06/2022
Summary of the review
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 Review - Trusted Reviews
A
androidauthority.com
20/04/2023
Summary of the review
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 review: Low cost, high value
E
engadget.com
10/11/2020
Summary of the review
Galaxy Tab A7 review: You get what you pay for
A
androidpolice.com
12/01/2021
Summary of the review
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 review, one month later
T
tomsguide.com
08/02/2024
Summary of the review
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 review
T
thehindu.com
23/01/2021
Summary of the review
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 review: For your basic binge
L
laptopmag.com
30/12/2020
Summary of the review
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 review
L
laptopmedia.com
30/11/2020
Summary of the review
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 (2020) review – a worthy little brother to the S7
S
smartphone-tipp.de
01/03/2021
Summary of the review
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7: Mein eigener Test dieses tollen Tablets
(Translated)Show original
C
computerbild.de
21/06/2021
Summary of the review
Galaxy Tab A7: Samsungs neues Preisbrecher-Tablet im Test Computer Bild
(Translated)Show original
L
lesnumeriques.com
20/11/2020
Summary of the review
Test Tablette Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 (2020): pensée pour une orientation paysage
(Translated)Show original
I
ilfattoquotidiano.it
24/11/2020
Summary of the review
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 (2020), recensione: un tablet "medio" sotto tutti i punti di vista, prezzo compreso
(Translated)Show original
A
andreagaleazzi.com
13/02/2021
Summary of the review
Recensione Samsung GALAXY TAB A7 - Andrea Galeazzi
(Translated)Show original
T
tomshw.it
23/11/2020
Summary of the review
Recensione Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 (2020) - Tom's Hardware
(Translated)Show original
L
laptopmedia.com
30/11/2020
Summary of the review
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 (2020) review – een waardig broertje van de S7
(Translated)Show original
N
notebookcheck.nl
26/11/2020
Summary of the review
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 LTE Tablet Review - Een van de beste tablets voor minder dan 300 euro (includes WiFi model comparison)
(Translated)Show original

Third-party reviews

What we like about Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 WiFi (4GB + 64GB)

  • Excellent value for the price, frequently cited as a top budget alternative to the iPad.
  • Immersive quad-speaker system with Dolby Atmos that provides loud and clear sound quality.
  • Outstanding battery life, with some testers reporting over 13 hours of continuous web browsing.
  • Sturdy aluminum unibody design that feels more premium than typical plastic budget tablets.
  • Sharp 10.4-inch display with good color reproduction for streaming video.
  • Inclusion of facial recognition for more effortless biometric unlocking.
  • MicroSD card slot for expandable storage up to 1TB and a standard 3.5mm headphone jack.

What we don't like about Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 WiFi (4GB + 64GB)

  • Limited 3GB of RAM and mid-range Snapdragon 662 processor can lead to lag when multitasking or opening apps.
  • Screen brightness is relatively low, making it difficult to view in direct sunlight or at wide angles.
  • Base model only comes with 32GB of internal storage, which is quickly consumed by the OS and pre-installed bloatware.
  • Poor camera quality on both the front and rear, suitable only for casual video calls.
  • Performance stutters during graphically intensive gaming (e.g., Asphalt 9 or Genshin Impact).
  • Slow charging speeds with the included adapter.

Verdict

The Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 WiFi (4GB + 64GB) is an affordable 10.4-inch tablet designed primarily for entertainment, featuring a 2000 x 1200 WUXGA+ TFT display and a slim 7mm metal body. Powered by a Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 octa-core processor, this specific variant offers 4GB of RAM and 64GB of internal storage, which can be expanded up to 1TB via microSD. Its main pros include an immersive quad-speaker system with Dolby Atmos, a long-lasting 7,040mAh battery with 15W fast charging, and a landscape-oriented 5MP front camera optimized for video calls. However, notable cons include a display that can appear dim in bright light, underwhelming camera performance for photography, and occasional lag when running demanding games or heavy multitasking.

Compare Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 WiFi (4GB + 64GB) with other tablets

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 WiFi (4GB + 64GB) and other tablets

No results found