OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS
Scored using Tablets Methodology v1.0
Tablets Methodology v1.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontum Tablets Methodology v1.0: technical specifications plus authentic consumer ratings, with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Tablets Methodology v1.0

Samsung Galaxy Tab A11 WiFi (4GB + 64GB) Review | 168 Data compared

Avg. price:~£160RAM capacity:4 GBInternal storage:64 GBScreen size:8.7 inchesChipset:MediaTek Helio G99

Samsung Galaxy Tab A11 WiFi (4GB + 64GB) Review: Compare 168 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Tablets category and whether it is worth buying.

Samsung Galaxy Tab A11 WiFi (4GB + 64GB)
6.7/10

Overall score

Score
6.7/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the smartphone's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best Tablets on the market.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 61% of models
Score components

90%

6.5

Technical score

10%

8.4

User score

â–²Better than 61% of tablets
7.6

Value for money

Value for money
7.6/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the smartphone's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a smartphone with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 67% of models
Score components

70%

6.7

Overall score

30%

9.7

Price

â–²Better than 67%
6.5

Technical score

Technical score
6.5/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of the smartphone's technical performance, covering eight key areas: performance & hardware, software, camera, connectivity, display, battery, audio, and design.
When it matters
When you want to compare Tablets based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 59% of models
Score components

22%

6.3

Performance

20%

5.7

Display

16%

6.8

Camera

14%

5.1

Battery

12%

6.8

Connectivity

8%

9.4

Software & Features

5%

7.2

Design

3%

7.1

Audio & Multimedia

â–²Better than 59%
8.4

User score

User score
8.4/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the smartphone
When it matters
When you want to know how a smartphone handles daily tasks and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 80% of models
Score components

70%

8.7

User ratings

30%

7.8

Number of reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
â–²Better than 80%
  • samsung-galaxy-tab-a11-4gb-64gb-wifi
samsung-galaxy-tab-a11-4gb-64gb-wifi
Where to buy
*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
Best rankings
Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Available versions:
4GB + 64GB8GB + 128GBCheck price
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of tablet Samsung Galaxy Tab A11 WiFi (4GB + 64GB)

Technical score
Technical score
6.5/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of the smartphone's technical performance, covering eight key areas: performance & hardware, software, camera, connectivity, display, battery, audio, and design.
When it matters
When you want to compare Tablets based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 59% of models
Score components:

22%

6.3

Performance

20%

5.7

Display

16%

6.8

Camera

14%

5.1

Battery

12%

6.8

Connectivity

8%

9.4

Software & Features

5%

7.2

Design

3%

7.1

Audio & Multimedia

6.5
User score
User score
8.4/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the smartphone
When it matters
When you want to know how a smartphone handles daily tasks and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 80% of models
Score components

70%

8.7

User ratings

30%

7.8

Number of reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
8.4
Popularity
Popularity
7.8/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the smartphone.
When it matters
When you prefer to purchase a product chosen and reviewed by many other consumers.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 76% of models
Popularity:
Samsung Galaxy Tab A11 WiFi (4GB + 64GB) has a user popularity of 7.8 points, which is lower than 76.2% of Tablets.
7.8
Value for money
Value for money
7.6/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the smartphone's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a smartphone with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 67% of models
Score components:

70%

6.7

Overall score

30%

9.7

Price

7.6
RAM capacity
4 GB
Market range: <2 GB – >12 GB
This tablet has a RAM capacity of 4 GB which is larger than the RAM capacity of 47.6% of tablets and equal to that of 17.6% of tablets.
Process node
6 nm
Market range: <4 nm – >40 nm
This tablet is built on a 6 nm process node, which is smaller than the node size used in 76.4% of tablets and equal to the node used in 8.2% of tablets.
Internal storage
64 GB
Market range: <0 GB – >250 GB
This tablet has an internal storage capacity of 64 GB which is larger than the storage of 39.5% of tablets and equal to that of 17.1% of tablets.
Geekbench 6 single-core benchmark score
729 points
Market range: <233 points – >2.3k points
This tablet scored 729 points in Geekbench 6 (single-core) which is higher than the score of 47.7% of tablets and equal to the score of 2.9% of tablets.
Chipset
MediaTek Helio G99
This tablet uses the MediaTek Helio G99 chipset, which is less advanced than the chipsets in 50.9% of tablets and equal to those in 2.9% of tablets.
Show more
Screen resolution
1340×800
This tablet has a screen resolution of 1340×800 which is lower than that of 64.2% of tablets and equal to that of 1.3% of tablets.
Refresh rate
90 Hz
Market range: <60 Hz – >120 Hz
This tablet supports a refresh rate of 90 Hz which is higher than in 73.8% of tablets and equal to that in 6.5% of tablets.
Display type
TFT LCD
This tablet uses a TFT LCD display type. 89.9% of tablets use this display technology.
Pixel density
179 ppi
Market range: <149 ppi – >291 ppi
This tablet has a pixel density of 179 ppi which is lower than that of 74.8% of tablets and equal to that of 0.8% of tablets.
Display glass type
Tempered Glass
This tablet uses Tempered Glass display glass which is weaker than that on 78.1% of tablets and equal to that on 19.5% of tablets.
Show more
Optical image stabilization
no
This tablet does not support optical image stabilization. 0.4% of tablets include OIS.
Main camera megapixels
8 MP
Market range: <3.15 MP – >13 MP
This tablet has a main camera resolution of 8 MP which is higher than that of 36.5% of tablets and equal to that of 31.8% of tablets.
Front camera megapixels
5 MP
Market range: <1.2 MP – >9 MP
This tablet has a front camera resolution of 5 MP which is higher than in 48.8% of tablets and equal to that in 19.6% of tablets.
Main camera aperture
f/2.0
This tablet has a main camera aperture of f/2.0 which is wider than that of 57.5% of tablets and equal to that of 24.5% of tablets.
Optical zoom
1xxx
This tablet supports 1xx optical zoom which is higher than in 18.4% of tablets and equal to that in 80.7% of tablets.
Show more
Battery capacity
5,100 mAh
Market range: <4k mAh – >10.1k mAh
This tablet has a battery capacity of 5,100 mAh which is smaller than the batteries in 63.4% of tablets and equal to those in 4.6% of tablets.
Charging speed
15 W
Market range: <10 W – >60 W
This tablet supports charging speeds of 15 W which is slower than in 52.2% of tablets and equal to speeds in 6.3% of tablets.
Battery life
10 hours
Market range: <6 hours – >16 hours
This tablet has a battery life of 10 hours, which is longer than that of 39.1% of tablets and equal to that of 20.5% of tablets.
Wireless charging
no
This tablet does not support wireless charging. 1.5% of tablets support wireless charging.
Fast charging
?
Show more
LTE support
no
This tablet does not support LTE. 63.3% of tablets include LTE connectivity.
Wi-Fi connectivity
yes
This tablet supports Wi-Fi connectivity. 0.2% of tablets offer Wi-Fi support.
GPS
yes
This tablet supports GPS. 17.3% of tablets include GPS functionality.
5G connectivity
no
This tablet does not support 5G connectivity. 11.1% of tablets support 5G.
NFC
no
This tablet does not support NFC. 10.9% of tablets support NFC.
Show more
Operating system
Android 15
This tablet uses the Android 15 operating system, which is more advanced than the one used by 91.9%.
Update support duration
long
This tablet offers long update support, which is longer than the support period of 80% of tablets and equal to that of 20% of tablets.
Direct OS updates
yes
This tablet receives direct OS updates. 20.3% of tablets receive direct updates.
On-device AI
no
This tablet does not support on-device AI. 28.3% of tablets support this capability.
App tracking protection
no
This tablet does not include app tracking protection. 28.3% of tablets include app tracking protection.
Show more
IP rating
IP52
This tablet has an IP rating of IP52 which is higher than that of 85% of tablets and equal to that of 6.2% of tablets.
Weight
335 g
Market range: <315 g – >730 g
This tablet weighs 335 g which is lighter than 86.2% of tablets and equal to the weight of 0.1% of tablets.
Backlit keyboard
yes
This tablet supports a backlit keyboard. 90.3% of tablets support backlit keyboards.
Keyboard accessory
no
This tablet does not support a keyboard accessory. 84.3% of tablets support this option.
Pen latency
N/A
Show more
Number of microphones
?
aptX Adaptive
no
This tablet does not support aptX Adaptive. 6.9% of tablets offer this codec.
Dolby Atmos support
yes
This tablet supports Dolby Atmos. 68.6% of tablets support Dolby Atmos.
N. of speakers
2
Market range: <1 – >6
This tablet includes 2 speakers, which is more than in 9.8% of tablets and equal to the number in 60.9% of tablets.
FM radio
no
This tablet does not include an FM radio. 19% of tablets offer FM radio functionality.
Show more

Samsung Galaxy Tab A11 WiFi (4GB + 64GB) vs the average tablet

246810TotalPerformanceDisplayCameraBatteryConnectivitySoftware & FeaturesDesignAudio & Multimedia
  • 50% higher refresh rate
    This tablet has a higher refresh rate than the average tablet (90 Hz vs 60 Hz). The average tablet has refresh rate of 60 Hz.
    90 Hz vs 60 Hz
  • More advanced operating system
    This tablet has a more advanced operating system than the average tablet (Android 15 vs Android). Operating system choice shapes app support, updates, and ecosystem features.
    Android 15 vs Android
  • 100 nits higher typical brightness
    This tablet has a higher typical brightness than the average tablet (500 nits vs 400 nits). The average tablet reaches 400 nits typical brightness.
    500 nits vs 400 nits
  • More capable chipset
    This tablet uses the MediaTek Helio G99 chipset, while the average tablet uses MediaTek MT8169A.
    MediaTek Helio G99 vs MediaTek MT8169A
  • 127 nits higher peak brightness
    This tablet has a higher peak brightness than the average tablet (528 nits vs 401 nits). The average tablet reaches 401 nits peak brightness.
    528 nits vs 401 nits
  • Longer update support
    This tablet offers longer update support than the average tablet (long vs medium). The average tablet gets medium of update support.
    long vs medium
  • 2,400 MHz faster RAM speed
    This tablet has a higher RAM speed than the average tablet (4,266 MHz vs 1,866 MHz). The average tablet has RAM speed of 1,866 MHz.
    4,266 MHz vs 1,866 MHz
  • Higher IP rating
    This tablet has a better IP rating than the average tablet (IP52 vs not rated). Water and dust protection are still uncommon on tablets.
    IP52 vs not rated
  • 5.3% higher user score
    User score
    8.4/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the smartphone
    When it matters
    When you want to know how a smartphone handles daily tasks and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
    Score distribution
    â–¼
    â–¼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    Samsung Galaxy Tab A11 WiFi
    the average tablet
    Samsung Galaxy Tab A11 WiFi (4GB + 64GB) has a higher user score than the average tablet (8.42 vs 8.000).
    8.42 vs 8
  • More capable chipset
    This tablet uses the MediaTek Helio G99 chipset, while the average tablet uses MediaTek MT8169A.
    MediaTek Helio G99 vs MediaTek MT8169A
  • 2,400 MHz faster RAM speed
    This tablet has a higher RAM speed than the average tablet (4,266 MHz vs 1,866 MHz). The average tablet has RAM speed of 1,866 MHz.
    4,266 MHz vs 1,866 MHz
  • 57.1% smaller process node
    This tablet uses a smaller process node than the average tablet (6 nm vs 14 nm). The average tablet uses a process node of 14 nm.
    6 nm vs 14 nm
  • Newer DDR memory version
    This tablet supports a newer DDR version than the average tablet (LPDDR4X vs LPDDR3). The average DDR version is LPDDR3.
    LPDDR4X vs LPDDR3
  • 53.8% faster GPU clock
    This tablet has a higher GPU frequency than the average tablet (1,000 MHz vs 650 MHz). The average tablet has GPU frequency of 650 MHz.
    1,000 MHz vs 650 MHz
  • 2 more CPU threads
    This tablet has more CPU threads than the average tablet (8 vs 6). The average tablet has 6 CPU threads.
    8 vs 6
  • 10% higher CPU speed
    This tablet has a higher CPU speed than the average tablet (2.2 GHz vs 2 GHz). The average tablet has CPU speed of 2 GHz.
    2.2 GHz vs 2 GHz
  • 43% higher memory bandwidth
    This tablet has a higher memory bandwidth than the average tablet (21.3 GB/s vs 14.9 GB/s). The average tablet has memory bandwidth of 14.9 GB/s.
    21.3 GB/s vs 14.9 GB/s
  • Better GPU
    This tablet uses the Mali-G57 MC2 GPU, while the average tablet uses Mali-G51. GPU choice is one of the main performance differences between tablets.
    Mali-G57 MC2 vs Mali-G51
  • 50% higher refresh rate
    This tablet has a higher refresh rate than the average tablet (90 Hz vs 60 Hz). The average tablet has refresh rate of 60 Hz.
    90 Hz vs 60 Hz
  • 100 nits higher typical brightness
    This tablet has a higher typical brightness than the average tablet (500 nits vs 400 nits). The average tablet reaches 400 nits typical brightness.
    500 nits vs 400 nits
  • 127 nits higher peak brightness
    This tablet has a higher peak brightness than the average tablet (528 nits vs 401 nits). The average tablet reaches 401 nits peak brightness.
    528 nits vs 401 nits
  • Higher contrast ratio
    This tablet has a higher contrast ratio than the average tablet (1461:1 vs 1015:1). The average tablet contrast ratio is 1015:1.
    1,461:1 vs 1,015:1
  • Allows manual ISO
    This tablet allows manual ISO adjustment, the average tablet does not. 46% of tablets feature manual ISO.
  • Wider main camera aperture
    This tablet has a better main camera aperture than the average tablet (f/2 vs f/2.2). The average tablet uses f/2.2 main camera aperture.
    f/2.0 vs f/2.2
  • Includes battery health monitoring
    This tablet features battery health monitoring, the average tablet does not. 37% of tablets include battery health tools.
  • Newer Bluetooth version
    This tablet supports a newer Bluetooth version than the average tablet (5.3 vs 5). The average tablet uses Bluetooth 5.0.
    5.3 vs 5.0
  • More advanced operating system
    This tablet has a more advanced operating system than the average tablet (Android 15 vs Android). Operating system choice shapes app support, updates, and ecosystem features.
    Android 15 vs Android
  • Longer update support
    This tablet offers longer update support than the average tablet (long vs medium). The average tablet gets medium of update support.
    long vs medium
  • Supports live text recognition
    This tablet supports live text recognition, the average tablet does not. 34.9% of tablets can recognize text from images.
  • Allows app offloading
    This tablet allows app offloading, the average tablet does not. 26.4% of tablets support app offloading.
  • Supports dynamic theme
    This tablet features dynamic themes, the average tablet does not. 29% of tablets offer dynamic theming.
  • Supports extra dim mode
    This tablet features extra dim mode, the average tablet does not. 35.4% of tablets support extra diming.
  • Includes clipboard warnings
    This tablet has clipboard warnings, the average tablet does not. 39.9% of tablets include clipboard warnings.
  • Higher IP rating
    This tablet has a better IP rating than the average tablet (IP52 vs not rated). Water and dust protection are still uncommon on tablets.
    IP52 vs not rated
  • 31.6% lighter
    This tablet is lighter than the average tablet (335 g vs 490 g). The average tablet weighs 490 g.
    335 g vs 490 g
  • Includes backlit keyboard
    This tablet has a backlit keyboard, the average tablet does not. 9.8% of tablets offer a backlit keyboard.
  • 6 newer release date
    This tablet has a newer release date than the average tablet (2025 vs 2019).
    September 2025
    2025 vs 2019
  • 50.6 mm narrower
    This tablet is narrower than the average tablet (124.7 mm vs 175.3 mm). The average tablet is 175.3 mm wide.
    124.7 mm vs 175.3 mm
  • Supports Dolby Atmos
    This tablet supports Dolby Atmos, the average tablet does not. 31.5% of tablets support Dolby Atmos.
  • Supports LDAC
    This tablet supports LDAC, the average tablet does not. 25.2% of tablets support LDAC.
  • Inferior display type
    This tablet has an inferior display type compared to the average tablet (TFT LCD vs IPS LCD). 0.00% of tablets use the superior display type.
    TFT LCD vs IPS LCD
  • No LTE support
    This tablet does not support LTE, the average tablet does. 63.2% of tablets support LTE.
  • No continuous video AF
    This tablet does not support continuous video AF, the average tablet does. 57.7% of tablets support continuous video autofocus.
  • Less durable display glass
    This tablet uses weaker display glass than the average tablet (Tempered Glass vs Corning Gorilla Glass). Display glass choice still varies across tablets.
    Tempered Glass vs Corning Gorilla Glass
  • 20.1% lower pixel density
    This tablet has a lower pixel density than the average tablet (179 ppi vs 224 ppi). The average tablet has pixel density of 224 ppi.
    179 ppi vs 224 ppi
  • No manual white balance
    This tablet does not allow manual white balance adjustments, the average tablet does. 51.6% of tablets include white balance controls.
  • No cellular module
    This tablet does not have a cellular module, the average tablet does. 59.3% of tablets include a cellular module.
  • 22.5% smaller battery capacity
    This tablet has a lower battery capacity than the average tablet (5,100 mAh vs 6,580 mAh). The average tablet battery has capacity of 6,580 mAh.
    5,100 mAh vs 6,580 mAh
  • 2 fewer GPU execution units
    This tablet has less GPU execution units than the average tablet (2 vs 4). The average tablet has 4 GPU execution units.
    2 vs 4
  • Inferior display type
    This tablet has an inferior display type compared to the average tablet (TFT LCD vs IPS LCD). 0.00% of tablets use the superior display type.
    TFT LCD vs IPS LCD
  • Less durable display glass
    This tablet uses weaker display glass than the average tablet (Tempered Glass vs Corning Gorilla Glass). Display glass choice still varies across tablets.
    Tempered Glass vs Corning Gorilla Glass
  • 20.1% lower pixel density
    This tablet has a lower pixel density than the average tablet (179 ppi vs 224 ppi). The average tablet has pixel density of 224 ppi.
    179 ppi vs 224 ppi
  • 1.4 inches smaller screen size
    This tablet has a lower screen size than the average tablet (8.7 inches vs 10.1 inches). The average tablet has screen size of 10.1 inches.
    8.7 inches vs 10.1 inches
  • Lower screen resolution
    This tablet has a lower screen resolution than the average tablet (1340×800 vs 1920×1200). The average tablet has a resolution of 1920×1200.
    1340×800 vs 1920×1200
  • 42 ppi lower screen sharpness
    This tablet has a lower screen sharpness than the average tablet (179 ppi vs 221 ppi). The average tablet has screen sharpness of 221 ppi.
    179 ppi vs 221 ppi
  • No continuous video AF
    This tablet does not support continuous video AF, the average tablet does. 57.7% of tablets support continuous video autofocus.
  • No manual white balance
    This tablet does not allow manual white balance adjustments, the average tablet does. 51.6% of tablets include white balance controls.
  • 22.5% smaller battery capacity
    This tablet has a lower battery capacity than the average tablet (5,100 mAh vs 6,580 mAh). The average tablet battery has capacity of 6,580 mAh.
    5,100 mAh vs 6,580 mAh
  • 16.7% slower charging speed
    This tablet supports slower charging than the average tablet (15 W vs 18 W). The average tablet supports charging speed of 18 W.
    15 W vs 18 W
  • No LTE support
    This tablet does not support LTE, the average tablet does. 63.2% of tablets support LTE.
  • No cellular module
    This tablet does not have a cellular module, the average tablet does. 59.3% of tablets include a cellular module.
  • No HDMI output
    This tablet does not have an HDMI output, the average tablet does. 50.1% of tablets support HDMI output.
  • No keyboard accessory
    This tablet does not support a keyboard accessory, the average tablet does. 84.2% of tablets support a keyboard accessory.

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

7.0
My Next Tablet
≈ estimated
16/01/2026
Hands-on review · two weeks of use and benchmarks
Verdict
Samsung Galaxy Tab A11 WiFi disappoints in speed and gaming, but is a good entry point for light use if the price drops.
8.0
Quick Expert Reviews
≈ estimated
09/01/2026
Hands-on review · gaming, reading and camera tests
Verdict
Samsung Galaxy Tab A11 WiFi is a simple value tablet, good for reading and video, but its blurry screen and weak gaming hold it back.
7.0
FishBee Productions
≈ estimated
20/11/2025
Hands-on review · battery test, gaming and comparison with Tab A9
Verdict
Samsung Galaxy Tab A11 WiFi is mostly the same as the Tab A9, with seven years of updates as the main gain.
4.0
TechRight
≈ estimated
18/11/2025
Pros and cons · storage check and feature comparison
Verdict
Samsung Galaxy Tab A11 WiFi is not recommended, since it barely improves on the Tab A9 and has low pixel density.
9.0
Unbox Journal
≈ estimated
13/11/2025
Hands-on review · first week and Tab A9 comparison
Verdict
Samsung Galaxy Tab A11 WiFi is a great portable choice for streaming and reading, but not an upgrade over an existing Tab A9.
6.0
FishBee Productions
≈ estimated
28/11/2025
Comparison · A11 vs A9 with battery test
Verdict
Samsung Galaxy Tab A11 WiFi is an upgrade mainly for its long software support; otherwise the differences are small.
9.0
TechRight
≈ estimated
15/11/2025
First look · unboxing, speaker and camera tests
Verdict
Samsung Galaxy Tab A11 WiFi is a good tablet for the money, with solid speakers and display for web, video and reading.
Not graded yet
Not graded yet

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

P
pcwelt.de
03/12/2025
Summary of the review
Samsung Galaxy Tab A11 im Test: Kompakt, leistungsstark & günstig
(Translated)Show original
H
heise.de
02/01/2026
Summary of the review
Samsung Galaxy Tab A11 im Test: Günstiges Mini-Tablet mit 8,7 Zoll
(Translated)Show original
C
computerbild.de
14/02/2026
Summary of the review
Samsung Galaxy Tab A11 im Test: Klein, günstig, ausdauernd?
(Translated)Show original
G
galaxus.de
18/03/2026
Summary of the review
Produktdetails & Nutzerbewertungen: Samsung Galaxy Tab A11 (nur WLAN) Benötigst du für eines dieser Modelle auch Informationen zu passendem Zubehör od...
(Translated)Show original
C
computerbild.de
15/02/2026
Summary of the review
Samsung Galaxy Tab A11+ im Test: Groß, günstig, scharf – reicht das? (Enthält Vergleich zum Standard A11) Would you like me to find accessories like c...
(Translated)Show original
L
lesnumeriques.com
29/11/2025
Summary of the review
Test Samsung Galaxy Tab A11+: une tablette abordable qui trace sa route sans freiner le budget
(Translated)Show original
A
androidplanet.nl
14/11/2025
Summary of the review
Samsung Galaxy Tab A11 review: kleine tablet in een handzaam jasje
(Translated)Show original

Third-party reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
Reviews last updated: November 2026 · How we calculate this

What customers like about Samsung Galaxy Tab A11 WiFi (4GB + 64GB)

  • Exceptional 7-year software support commitment for a budget device
  • Smooth 90Hz refresh rate display which is a significant upgrade over predecessors
  • Highly portable, lightweight design suitable for one-handed use
  • Excellent value for price, often cited as a top budget entry-level choice
  • Reliable battery life that can last for several days of moderate use
  • Upgraded front-facing camera that is better suited for video calls

What customers don't like about Samsung Galaxy Tab A11 WiFi (4GB + 64GB)

  • Underwhelming performance on the 4GB RAM model, leading to frequent app lag
  • Painfully slow 15W charging that takes several hours for a full charge
  • Low screen resolution (179 ppi) results in visible pixels and less sharpness
  • Lack of biometrics like a fingerprint scanner or 3D face unlock
  • Limited storage on base models (64GB), making a microSD card almost essential
  • Speakers lack bass and depth for immersive media consumption

Verdict

The Samsung Galaxy Tab A11 WiFi is a compact 8.7-inch budget tablet featuring an 800 x 1340 resolution LCD screen with a notable 90Hz refresh rate for smooth scrolling. It is powered by a MediaTek Helio G99 octa-core processor paired with 4GB of RAM and 64GB of internal storage, which can be expanded up to 2TB via a microSD card. Main pros include its premium-feeling aluminum build, seven years of promised software updates, a long-lasting 5,100 mAh battery, and the inclusion of a 3.5mm headphone jack and Dolby Atmos-supported dual speakers. However, the device has significant cons such as a relatively low-resolution display where pixels may be visible, a lack of biometrics like a fingerprint scanner, and basic 15W charging speeds that result in longer recharge times.

Compare Samsung Galaxy Tab A11 WiFi (4GB + 64GB) with other tablets

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Samsung Galaxy Tab A11 WiFi (4GB + 64GB) and other tablets

No results found