OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS
Scored using Tablets Methodology v1.0
Tablets Methodology v1.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontum Tablets Methodology v1.0: technical specifications plus authentic consumer ratings, with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Tablets Methodology v1.0

Samsung Galaxy Tab 4 8 0 1 WiFi (5GB + 32GB) Review | 168 Data compared

Avg. price:~£240RAM capacity:1.5 GBInternal storage:32 GBScreen size:8 inchesChipset:Qualcomm Snapdragon 400

Samsung Galaxy Tab 4 8 0 1 WiFi (5GB + 32GB) Review: Compare 168 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Tablets category and whether it is worth buying.

5.3/10

Overall score

Score
5.3/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the smartphone's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best Tablets on the market.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 80% of models
Score components

90%

5.1

Technical score

10%

7.0

User score

â–¼Worse than 80% of tablets
6.5

Value for money

Value for money
6.5/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the smartphone's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a smartphone with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 78% of models
Score components

70%

5.3

Overall score

30%

9.3

Price

â–¼Worse than 78%
5.1

Technical score

Technical score
5.1/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of the smartphone's technical performance, covering eight key areas: performance & hardware, software, camera, connectivity, display, battery, audio, and design.
When it matters
When you want to compare Tablets based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 82% of models
Score components

22%

4.9

Performance

20%

4.0

Display

16%

5.1

Camera

14%

4.5

Battery

12%

6.4

Connectivity

8%

7.0

Software & Features

5%

6.5

Design

3%

4.6

Audio & Multimedia

â–¼Worse than 82%
7.0

User score

User score
7.0/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the smartphone
When it matters
When you want to know how a smartphone handles daily tasks and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 86% of models
Score components

70%

7.6

User ratings

30%

5.5

Number of reviews

â–¼Worse than 86%
  • No image
No image
Best prices
    N/A~ £240
Best rankings
Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Available versions:
5GB + 16GBCheck price
Other versions:
5GB + 32GB
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of tablet Samsung Galaxy Tab 4 8 0 1 WiFi (5GB + 32GB)

Technical score
Technical score
5.1/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of the smartphone's technical performance, covering eight key areas: performance & hardware, software, camera, connectivity, display, battery, audio, and design.
When it matters
When you want to compare Tablets based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 82% of models
Score components:

22%

4.9

Performance

20%

4.0

Display

16%

5.1

Camera

14%

4.5

Battery

12%

6.4

Connectivity

8%

7.0

Software & Features

5%

6.5

Design

3%

4.6

Audio & Multimedia

5.1
User score
User score
7.0/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the smartphone
When it matters
When you want to know how a smartphone handles daily tasks and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 86% of models
Score components

70%

7.6

User ratings

30%

5.5

Number of reviews

7.0
Popularity
Popularity
5.5/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the smartphone.
When it matters
When you prefer to purchase a product chosen and reviewed by many other consumers.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 55% of models
Popularity:
Samsung Galaxy Tab 4 8 0 1 WiFi (5GB + 32GB) has a user popularity of 5.5 points, which is lower than 54.9% of Tablets.
5.5
Value for money
Value for money
6.5/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the smartphone's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a smartphone with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 78% of models
Score components:

70%

5.3

Overall score

30%

9.3

Price

6.5
RAM capacity
1.5 GB
Market range: <2 GB – >12 GB
This tablet has a RAM capacity of 1.5 GB which is smaller than the RAM capacity of 76.6% of tablets and equal to that of 1.2% of tablets.
Process node
28 nm
Market range: <4 nm – >40 nm
This tablet is built on a 28 nm process node, which is larger than the node size used in 64.7% of tablets and equal to the node used in 17.8% of tablets.
Internal storage
32 GB
Market range: <0 GB – >250 GB
This tablet has an internal storage capacity of 32 GB which is smaller than the storage of 60.5% of tablets and equal to that of 18% of tablets.
Geekbench 6 single-core benchmark score
?
Chipset
Qualcomm Snapdragon 400
This tablet uses the Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 chipset, which is more advanced than the chipsets in 51.1% of tablets and equal to those in 1% of tablets.
Show more
Screen resolution
1280×800
This tablet has a screen resolution of 1280×800 which is lower than that of 68.1% of tablets and equal to that of 21.7% of tablets.
Refresh rate
60 Hz
Market range: <60 Hz – >120 Hz
This tablet supports a refresh rate of 60 Hz which is equal to that in 73.8% of tablets.
Display type
TFT LCD
This tablet uses a TFT LCD display type. 89.9% of tablets use this display technology.
Pixel density
189 ppi
Market range: <149 ppi – >291 ppi
This tablet has a pixel density of 189 ppi which is lower than that of 66.5% of tablets and equal to that of 6.8% of tablets.
Display glass type
Corning Gorilla Glass
This tablet uses Corning Gorilla Glass display glass which is stronger than that on 45.4% of tablets and equal to that on 32.7% of tablets.
Show more
Optical image stabilization
no
This tablet does not support optical image stabilization. 0.4% of tablets include OIS.
Main camera megapixels
3.15 MP
Market range: <3.15 MP – >13 MP
This tablet has a main camera resolution of 3.15 MP which is lower than that of 89.8% of tablets and equal to that of 2.6% of tablets.
Front camera megapixels
1.3 MP
Market range: <1.2 MP – >9 MP
This tablet has a front camera resolution of 1.3 MP which is lower than in 80.8% of tablets and equal to that in 5.5% of tablets.
Main camera aperture
f/2.4
This tablet has a main camera aperture of f/2.4 which is narrower than that of 69.8% of tablets and equal to that of 17.6% of tablets.
Optical zoom
1xxx
This tablet supports 1xx optical zoom which is higher than in 18.4% of tablets and equal to that in 80.7% of tablets.
Show more
Battery capacity
4,450 mAh
Market range: <4k mAh – >10.1k mAh
This tablet has a battery capacity of 4,450 mAh which is smaller than the batteries in 78.6% of tablets and equal to those in 0.6% of tablets.
Charging speed
10 W
Market range: <10 W – >60 W
This tablet supports charging speeds of 10 W which is slower than in 61% of tablets and equal to speeds in 33.2% of tablets.
Battery life
12 hours
Market range: <6 hours – >16 hours
This tablet has a battery life of 12 hours, which is longer than that of 65.7% of tablets and equal to that of 9.3% of tablets.
internet usage
Wireless charging
no
This tablet does not support wireless charging. 1.5% of tablets support wireless charging.
Fast charging
no
This tablet does not support fast charging. 49.7% of tablets support fast charging.
Show more
LTE support
yes
This tablet supports LTE. 36.8% of tablets include LTE connectivity.
Wi-Fi connectivity
yes
This tablet supports Wi-Fi connectivity. 0.2% of tablets offer Wi-Fi support.
GPS
yes
This tablet supports GPS. 17.3% of tablets include GPS functionality.
5G connectivity
no
This tablet does not support 5G connectivity. 11.1% of tablets support 5G.
NFC
no
This tablet does not support NFC. 10.9% of tablets support NFC.
Show more
Operating system
Android
This tablet uses the Android operating system, which is more advanced than the one used by 23.3%.
Update support duration
short
This tablet offers short update support, which is shorter than the support period of 52.7% of tablets and equal to that of 47.3% of tablets.
Direct OS updates
yes
This tablet receives direct OS updates. 20.3% of tablets receive direct updates.
On-device AI
no
This tablet does not support on-device AI. 28.3% of tablets support this capability.
App tracking protection
no
This tablet does not include app tracking protection. 28.3% of tablets include app tracking protection.
Show more
IP rating
not rated
This tablet has an IP rating of not rated which is lower than that of 16.3% of tablets and equal to that of 83.7% of tablets.
Weight
320 g
Market range: <315 g – >730 g
This tablet weighs 320 g which is lighter than 88.5% of tablets and equal to the weight of 0.9% of tablets.
Backlit keyboard
no
This tablet does not support a backlit keyboard. 9.8% of tablets support backlit keyboards.
Keyboard accessory
?
Pen latency
N/A
Show more
Number of microphones
?
aptX Adaptive
no
This tablet does not support aptX Adaptive. 6.9% of tablets offer this codec.
Dolby Atmos support
no
This tablet does not support Dolby Atmos. 31.5% of tablets support Dolby Atmos.
N. of speakers
1
Market range: <1 – >6
This tablet includes 1 speakers, which is fewer than in 90.2% of tablets and equal to the number in 9.6% of tablets.
FM radio
no
This tablet does not include an FM radio. 19% of tablets offer FM radio functionality.
Show more

Samsung Galaxy Tab 4 8 0 1 WiFi (5GB + 32GB) vs the average tablet

246810TotalPerformanceDisplayCameraBatteryConnectivitySoftware & FeaturesDesignAudio & Multimedia
  • More capable chipset
    This tablet uses the Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 chipset, while the average tablet uses MediaTek MT8169A.
    Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 vs MediaTek MT8169A
  • Better GPU
    This tablet uses the Adreno 305 GPU, while the average tablet uses Mali-G51. GPU choice is one of the main performance differences between tablets.
    Adreno 305 vs Mali-G51
  • 2 hours longer battery life
    This tablet offers longer battery life than the average tablet (12 hours vs 10 hours). The average tablet offers 10 hours of battery life.
    internet usage
    12 hours vs 10 hours
  • 34.7% lighter
    This tablet is lighter than the average tablet (320 g vs 490 g). The average tablet weighs 490 g.
    320 g vs 490 g
  • Supports slow-motion recording
    This tablet supports slow-motion recording, the average tablet does not. 37.5% of tablets offer slow-mo.
  • 51.3 mm narrower
    This tablet is narrower than the average tablet (124 mm vs 175.3 mm). The average tablet is 175.3 mm wide.
    124 mm vs 175.3 mm
  • Designed for kids
    This tablet is suitable for kids, the average tablet is not. 23.7% of tablets are suitable for kids.
  • More capable chipset
    This tablet uses the Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 chipset, while the average tablet uses MediaTek MT8169A.
    Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 vs MediaTek MT8169A
  • Better GPU
    This tablet uses the Adreno 305 GPU, while the average tablet uses Mali-G51. GPU choice is one of the main performance differences between tablets.
    Adreno 305 vs Mali-G51
  • Supports slow-motion recording
    This tablet supports slow-motion recording, the average tablet does not. 37.5% of tablets offer slow-mo.
  • 2 hours longer battery life
    This tablet offers longer battery life than the average tablet (12 hours vs 10 hours). The average tablet offers 10 hours of battery life.
    internet usage
    12 hours vs 10 hours
  • 34.7% lighter
    This tablet is lighter than the average tablet (320 g vs 490 g). The average tablet weighs 490 g.
    320 g vs 490 g
  • 51.3 mm narrower
    This tablet is narrower than the average tablet (124 mm vs 175.3 mm). The average tablet is 175.3 mm wide.
    124 mm vs 175.3 mm
  • Designed for kids
    This tablet is suitable for kids, the average tablet is not. 23.7% of tablets are suitable for kids.
  • 3.7 MP lower front camera megapixels
    This tablet has less front camera megapixels than the average tablet (1.3 MP vs 5 MP). The average tablet has 5 MP front camera resolution.
    1.3 MP vs 5 MP
  • Inferior display type
    This tablet has an inferior display type compared to the average tablet (TFT LCD vs IPS LCD). 0.00% of tablets use the superior display type.
    TFT LCD vs IPS LCD
  • No USB Type-C
    This tablet lacks a USB Type-C port, the average tablet includes one. 53.4% of tablets use USB Type-C.
  • 4.85 MP lower main camera megapixels
    This tablet has a lower-resolution main camera than the average tablet (3.2 MP vs 8 MP). The average tablet has a 8 MP main camera.
    3.15 MP vs 8 MP
  • Shorter update support
    This tablet offers shorter update support than the average tablet (short vs medium). The average tablet gets medium of update support.
    short vs medium
  • 40% lower CPU speed
    This tablet has a lower CPU speed than the average tablet (1.2 GHz vs 2 GHz). The average tablet has CPU speed of 2 GHz.
    1.2 GHz vs 2 GHz
  • 2.5 GB less RAM
    This tablet has less RAM capacity than the average tablet (1.5 GB vs 4 GB). The average tablet has 4 GB of RAM.
    1.5 GB vs 4 GB
  • No continuous video AF
    This tablet does not support continuous video AF, the average tablet does. 57.7% of tablets support continuous video autofocus.
  • 14.5% lower user score
    User score
    7.0/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the smartphone
    When it matters
    When you want to know how a smartphone handles daily tasks and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
    Score distribution
    ▼▼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    Samsung Galaxy Tab 4 8 0 1 WiFi
    the average tablet
    Samsung Galaxy Tab 4 8 0 1 WiFi (5GB + 32GB) has a lower user score than the average tablet (6.98 vs 8.000).
    6.98 vs 8
  • 9.4% worse value for money
    Samsung Galaxy Tab 4 8 0 1 WiFi (5GB + 32GB) has worse value for money than the average tablet (6.49 vs 7.1).
    6.49 vs 7.1
  • 40% lower CPU speed
    This tablet has a lower CPU speed than the average tablet (1.2 GHz vs 2 GHz). The average tablet has CPU speed of 2 GHz.
    1.2 GHz vs 2 GHz
  • 2.5 GB less RAM
    This tablet has less RAM capacity than the average tablet (1.5 GB vs 4 GB). The average tablet has 4 GB of RAM.
    1.5 GB vs 4 GB
  • 1,333 MHz slower RAM speed
    This tablet has a lower RAM speed than the average tablet (533 MHz vs 1866 MHz). The average tablet has RAM speed of 1866 MHz.
    533 MHz vs 1,866 MHz
  • 2x larger process node
    This tablet uses a larger process node than the average tablet (28 nm vs 14 nm). The average tablet uses a process node of 14 nm.
    28 nm vs 14 nm
  • 73.2% lower memory bandwidth
    This tablet has a lower memory bandwidth than the average tablet (4 GB/s vs 14.9 GB/s). The average tablet has memory bandwidth of 14.9 GB/s.
    4 GB/s vs 14.9 GB/s
  • 2 fewer CPU threads
    This tablet has less CPU threads than the average tablet (4 vs 6). The average tablet has 6 CPU threads.
    4 vs 6
  • 50% less storage
    This tablet has less internal storage than the average tablet (32 GB vs 64 GB). The average tablet provides 64 GB of internal storage.
    32 GB vs 64 GB
  • 30.8% slower GPU clock
    This tablet has a lower GPU frequency than the average tablet (450 MHz vs 650 MHz). The average tablet has GPU frequency of 650 MHz.
    450 MHz vs 650 MHz
  • Inferior display type
    This tablet has an inferior display type compared to the average tablet (TFT LCD vs IPS LCD). 0.00% of tablets use the superior display type.
    TFT LCD vs IPS LCD
  • Lower screen resolution
    This tablet has a lower screen resolution than the average tablet (1280×800 vs 1920×1200). The average tablet has a resolution of 1920×1200.
    1280×800 vs 1920×1200
  • 2.1 inches smaller screen size
    This tablet has a lower screen size than the average tablet (8 inches vs 10.1 inches). The average tablet has screen size of 10.1 inches.
    8 inches vs 10.1 inches
  • 63 nits lower typical brightness
    This tablet has a lower typical brightness than the average tablet (337 nits vs 400 nits). The average tablet reaches 400 nits typical brightness.
    337 nits vs 400 nits
  • 51 nits lower peak brightness
    This tablet has a lower peak brightness than the average tablet (350 nits vs 401 nits). The average tablet reaches 401 nits peak brightness.
    350 nits vs 401 nits
  • 15.6% lower pixel density
    This tablet has a lower pixel density than the average tablet (189 ppi vs 224 ppi). The average tablet has pixel density of 224 ppi.
    189 ppi vs 224 ppi
  • 32 ppi lower screen sharpness
    This tablet has a lower screen sharpness than the average tablet (189 ppi vs 221 ppi). The average tablet has screen sharpness of 221 ppi.
    189 ppi vs 221 ppi
  • Lower contrast ratio
    This tablet has a lower contrast ratio than the average tablet (991:1 vs 1015:1). The average tablet has a contrast ratio of 1015:1.
    991:1 vs 1,015:1
  • 3.7 MP lower front camera megapixels
    This tablet has less front camera megapixels than the average tablet (1.3 MP vs 5 MP). The average tablet has 5 MP front camera resolution.
    1.3 MP vs 5 MP
  • 4.85 MP lower main camera megapixels
    This tablet has a lower-resolution main camera than the average tablet (3.2 MP vs 8 MP). The average tablet has a 8 MP main camera.
    3.15 MP vs 8 MP
  • No continuous video AF
    This tablet does not support continuous video AF, the average tablet does. 57.7% of tablets support continuous video autofocus.
  • Worse main-camera video
    This tablet supports worse main-camera video recording than the average tablet (720x30 fps vs 1080x30 fps). The average tablet supports 1080x30 fps main-camera video recording.
    720x30 fps vs 1080x30 fps
  • No touch autofocus
    This tablet does not support touch autofocus, the average tablet does. 82.8% of tablets allow touch-to-focus.
  • No manual white balance
    This tablet does not allow manual white balance adjustments, the average tablet does. 51.6% of tablets include white balance controls.
  • No burst mode
    This tablet does not support burst mode, the average tablet does. 60.5% of tablets support burst mode.
  • No BSI sensor
    This tablet lacks a BSI sensor, the average tablet has one. 52.6% of tablets use BSI sensors for better low-light shots.
  • Narrower main camera aperture
    This tablet has a worse main camera aperture than the average tablet (f/2.4 vs f/2.2). The average tablet uses f/2.2 main camera aperture.
    f/2.4 vs f/2.2
  • 32.4% smaller battery capacity
    This tablet has a lower battery capacity than the average tablet (4450 mAh vs 6580 mAh). The average tablet battery has capacity of 6580 mAh.
    4,450 mAh vs 6,580 mAh
  • 44.4% slower charging speed
    This tablet supports slower charging than the average tablet (10 W vs 18 W). The average tablet supports charging speed of 18 W.
    10 W vs 18 W
  • No USB Type-C
    This tablet lacks a USB Type-C port, the average tablet includes one. 53.4% of tablets use USB Type-C.
  • Older Wi-Fi version
    This tablet uses an older Wi-Fi version than the average tablet (Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n) vs Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac)). The average tablet uses Wi-Fi Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac).
    Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n) vs Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac)
  • Older Bluetooth version
    This tablet uses an older Bluetooth version than the average tablet (4 vs 5). The average tablet uses Bluetooth 5.0.
    4.0 vs 5.0
  • No HDMI output
    This tablet does not have an HDMI output, the average tablet does. 50.1% of tablets support HDMI output.
  • No face recognition
    This tablet does not have face recognition, the average tablet does. 56% of tablets support face recognition.
  • Shorter update support
    This tablet offers shorter update support than the average tablet (short vs medium). The average tablet gets medium of update support.
    short vs medium
  • No picture-in-picture mode
    This tablet does not support picture-in-picture, the average tablet does. 61% of tablets support picture-in-picture.
  • No full-page screenshots
    This tablet does not support full-page screenshots, the average tablet does. 52.5% of tablets support full-page screenshots.
  • No location privacy controls
    This tablet does not offer location privacy controls, the average tablet does. 76.5% of tablets include location privacy features.
  • No dark mode
    This tablet does not support dark mode, the average tablet does. 57.2% of tablets have dark mode.
  • 5 older release date
    This tablet is an older model than the average tablet (2014 vs 2019).
    May 2014
    2014 vs 2019
  • 1 fewer speakers
    This tablet has less speakers than the average tablet (1 vs 2). The average tablet has 2 speakers.
    1 vs 2

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

U
uk.pcmag.com
27/05/2014
Summary of the review
Samsung Galaxy Tab 4 8.0 Review - PCMag UK
E
expertreviews.co.uk
18/01/2017
Summary of the review
Samsung Galaxy Tab 4 8.0 review: A competent budget tablet
T
techadvisor.com
29/08/2014
Summary of the review
Samsung Galaxy Tab 4 8.0 review - Tech Advisor
A
androidcentral.com
11/06/2014
Summary of the review
Samsung Galaxy Tab 4 review - Android Central
P
pcmag.com
27/05/2014
Summary of the review
Samsung Galaxy Tab 4 8.0 Review - PCMag
A
au.pcmag.com
28/05/2014
Summary of the review
Samsung Galaxy Tab 4 8.0 Review - PCMag Australia Would you like to compare the battery life or camera performance across these specific reviews?
N
notebookcheck.net
03/07/2014
Summary of the review
Samsung Galaxy Tab 4 8.0 Review - Hot Hardware via NotebookCheck
W
welt.de
08/06/2014
Summary of the review
Tablet-Test: Samsung Galaxy Tab 4 mit museumsreifer Kamera
(Translated)Show original
L
lesnumeriques.com
Date non spécifiée
Summary of the review
Samsung Galaxy Tab 4 8.0: meilleur prix
(Translated)Show original
0
01net.com
Date non spécifiée
Summary of the review
Samsung Galaxy Tab4 8.0 Wi-Fi contre Google Pixel Tablet
(Translated)Show original
A
android-mt.ouest-france.fr
19/08/2014
Summary of the review
Test de la Samsung Galaxy Tab 4: Une simple mise à niveau… pas une révolution
(Translated)Show original
N
nicolasforcet.com
02/11/2014
Summary of the review
[Test] Tablette Android Galaxy Tab 4
(Translated)Show original

Third-party reviews

What we like about Samsung Galaxy Tab 4 8 0 1 WiFi (5GB + 32GB)

  • Compact and lightweight design, comfortable for one-handed use
  • Smooth performance for basic tasks like web browsing and email
  • Multi-window feature allows for effective split-screen multitasking
  • Includes a microSD card slot for easy storage expansion
  • Solid battery life, typically lasting 9–10 hours of general use

What we don't like about Samsung Galaxy Tab 4 8 0 1 WiFi (5GB + 32GB)

  • Low screen resolution (1280x800) results in pixelated text and images
  • Poor camera quality; both front and rear cameras produce grainy, dull photos
  • Single rear-facing speaker is often described as tinny and easily muffled
  • Plastic build can feel 'cheap' compared to premium or newer metal/glass models
  • Capacitive navigation buttons do not light up and are easy to trigger accidentally
  • Slow performance when running graphically intensive or 3D games

Verdict

The Samsung Galaxy Tab 4 8.0 (SM-T330) is a portable 8-inch tablet featuring a WXGA TFT display with a 1280 x 800 resolution and a 16:10 aspect ratio. It is powered by a 1.2 GHz quad-core Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 processor and 1.5GB of RAM, with this specific variant offering 32GB of internal storage expandable via a microSD slot. Its primary strengths include a lightweight, slim design with a textured back for better grip, reliable dual-band Wi-Fi connectivity, and useful software features like Multi-Window multitasking and a built-in IR blaster for universal remote functionality. However, it is held back by a relatively low-resolution screen with visible pixelation, mediocre 3MP rear and 1.3MP front cameras that lack detail, and a plastic build that some users find less premium compared to higher-end models.

Compare Samsung Galaxy Tab 4 8 0 1 WiFi (5GB + 32GB) with other tablets

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Samsung Galaxy Tab 4 8 0 1 WiFi (5GB + 32GB) and other tablets

No results found