OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS
Scored using Tablets Methodology v3.0
Tablets Methodology v3.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontum Tablets Methodology v3.0: the technical score from the specifications is the base, and independent expert and video reviews (up to ±0.5 points), owner opinions (up to ±0.3) and best-of lists (up to +0.3) move it up or down.
Explore Tablets Methodology v3.0

Samsung Galaxy Tab 4 10.1 WiFi (5GB + 16GB) review: 168 specs compared

Avg. price:~£310RAM capacity:1.5 GBInternal storage:16 GBScreen size:10.1 inchesChipset:Qualcomm Snapdragon 400

Samsung Galaxy Tab 4 10.1 WiFi (5GB + 16GB) Review: Compare 168 technical specifications and 22 expert and video reviews to see how this product ranks in the Tablets category and whether it is worth buying.

Samsung Galaxy Tab 4 10.1 WiFi (5GB + 16GB)
5.7/10

Overall score

Score
5.7/ 10
✕
What it is
Our main score for this model, 1–10. It combines specs, best-of lists, expert reviews and owners.
How we count it
Parts: Technical score 35%, List score 30%, Reviews score 25%, Sentiment score 10%
Marks: Each part gets a mark out of 10. For reviews, lists and owners, a typical model in this category gets about 8 and the best one gets 10.
No data yet: A part with no data shows "?". It counts as the mark of a weaker model in this category (4 in 5 models with data score higher). This way, models with reviews, lists and owners usually come out ahead.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 95% of models
Score components

35%

5.0

Technical score

30%

?

List scoreNot enough data yet, so we use 7.5, the mark of a weaker model in this category

25%

5.0

Reviews score

10%

5.0

Sentiment score

â–¼Worse than 95% of tablets
6.7

Value for money

Value for money
6.7/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the tablet's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a tablet with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 93% of models
Score components

70%

5.7

Overall score

30%

8.9

Price

â–¼Worse than 93%
5.0

Technical score

Technical score
5.0/ 10
✕
What it is
How good the specs are compared with the other models in this category, 1–10.
How we count it
Areas: We rate the specs in each area against the other models in this category.
Weighting: The areas that matter most to buyers count more. The shares are shown under Score components.
Share: The technical score is 35% of the overall score.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 89% of models
Score components

22%

4.7

Performance

20%

4.1

Display

16%

4.7

Camera

14%

4.6

Battery

12%

5.7

Connectivity

8%

7.3

Software

5%

6.0

Design

3%

4.8

Audio

â–¼Worse than 89%
5.0

Reviews score

Reviews score
5.0/ 10
✕
What it is
Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
How we count it
Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves. Big test sites count more, short reviews half as much as full tests. A video review counts half.
Score: The average grade is 80% of the review mark; the number of reviews is the other 20% (1 review = 5, the typical number in this category = 8, the most-reviewed model = 10).
Enough data: With few reviews, the average grade is pulled toward the typical grade of this category. No reviews yet: 7.4 for now.
Share: Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 91% of models

5.0

Mark 7.7 is below the typical mark 7.8 of this category, so it cannot lift the score above the technical score

80%

7.6

Average grade

20%

8.5

Popularity

Grades by review (22)
13 reviews: 8 with a printed score, 5 estimated from the review. 9 video reviews, each counting half as much as a written test. Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
User ratings collected online are not part of this score.
â–¼Worse than 91%
?

List score

List score
7.5/ 10
✕
What it is
How often independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers put this model in their best-of lists for this category.
How we count it
Points: The model in the most lists of this category gets 10; the others get 8 to 10 in proportion. In no list yet: 7.5. Lists count 30% of the overall score.
Enough data: Every list counts, even a single one. With fewer than 5 best-of lists in the category, this part is left out.
Lists with this model (0)
Not in any best-of list yet, so this part counts as 7.5. Models in a list get 8 to 10.
Not in any best-of list yet
  • samsung-galaxy-tab-4-10-1-1-5gb-16gb-wifi
  • samsung-galaxy-tab-4-10-1-1-5gb-16gb-wifi
  • samsung-galaxy-tab-4-10-1-1-5gb-16gb-wifi
  • samsung-galaxy-tab-4-10-1-1-5gb-16gb-wifi
  • samsung-galaxy-tab-4-10-1-1-5gb-16gb-wifi
  • samsung-galaxy-tab-4-10-1-1-5gb-16gb-wifi
  • samsung-galaxy-tab-4-10-1-1-5gb-16gb-wifi
  • samsung-galaxy-tab-4-10-1-1-5gb-16gb-wifi
  • samsung-galaxy-tab-4-10-1-1-5gb-16gb-wifi
samsung-galaxy-tab-4-10-1-1-5gb-16gb-wifi
samsung-galaxy-tab-4-10-1-1-5gb-16gb-wifi
samsung-galaxy-tab-4-10-1-1-5gb-16gb-wifi
samsung-galaxy-tab-4-10-1-1-5gb-16gb-wifi
samsung-galaxy-tab-4-10-1-1-5gb-16gb-wifi
samsung-galaxy-tab-4-10-1-1-5gb-16gb-wifi
samsung-galaxy-tab-4-10-1-1-5gb-16gb-wifi
samsung-galaxy-tab-4-10-1-1-5gb-16gb-wifi
samsung-galaxy-tab-4-10-1-1-5gb-16gb-wifi
Where to buy
    N/A~ £310
Best rankings
Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Other versions:
5GB + 16GB5GB + 32GB

What reviewers say about the Samsung Galaxy Tab 4 10.1 WiFi (5GB + 16GB)

Based on 13 · 10

Reviewers praise the light build and good battery life, but almost all slam the camera and many dislike the screen resolution.
Praised
Mixed views
Criticised
Pick a topic to see who said what

What owners say about the Samsung Galaxy Tab 4 10.1 WiFi (5GB + 16GB)

Based on 218 owners sharing their experience in online comments

31%positive14%mixed55%negative

Owners praise its lasting reliability and smooth performance, while reset failures, software problems, and aging hardware cause frustration.

What owners dislike

  • After an Odin flash, the tablet may stay on the Downloading screen or show Could not do normal boot, and key combinations often failed to exit.19
  • After installing, the tablet may hang on the Samsung logo or starting apps for hours; a factory data reset sometimes fixes it.17
  • The recovery or factory reset menu may not appear, showing a custom OS warning instead, or the tablet powers off or shows an error during wipe.14
  • After the update, owners report reboots, freezes, force-closing apps and Google Play problems; some went back to Lollipop.11
  • Owners say the battery wears out, drains within a couple of hours, charges slowly, and in some cases has leaked or shown an overheating warning.10
  • Owners find the cameras very poor, and some say they stopped working after installing custom firmware or an update.7
  • Owners report the screen cracking after a drop or knock, touch no longer responding, and sometimes sound but no picture on the display.7
  • Owners find it slow and laggy with heavier tasks, such as repeatedly pasting text into a notes app, and it has slowed further over time.6
  • Owners say the charging port is fragile and can break or stop charging, and charging can take over twelve hours.6
  • Owners report the SD card repeatedly disconnecting with damaged-card messages, apps on the card stopping after an update, and storage filling up quickly.5

Points mentioned by at least 3 owners, most mentioned first.

Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of tablet Samsung Galaxy Tab 4 10.1 WiFi (5GB + 16GB)

Technical score
Technical score
5.0/ 10
✕
What it is
How good the specs are compared with the other models in this category, 1–10.
How we count it
Areas: We rate the specs in each area against the other models in this category.
Weighting: The areas that matter most to buyers count more. The shares are shown under Score components.
Share: The technical score is 35% of the overall score.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 89% of models
Score components:

22%

4.7

Performance

20%

4.1

Display

16%

4.7

Camera

14%

4.6

Battery

12%

5.7

Connectivity

8%

7.3

Software

5%

6.0

Design

3%

4.8

Audio

5.0
Reviews score
5.0
List score
?
Value for money
Value for money
6.7/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the tablet's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a tablet with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 93% of models
Score components:

70%

5.7

Overall score

30%

8.9

Price

6.7
RAM capacity
1.5 GB
Market range: <1 GB – >8 GB
This tablet has 1.5 GB of RAM, which is less than 76.8% of tablets and equal to 1.2% of tablets.
Process node
28 nm
Market range: <4 nm – >40 nm
This tablet is built on a 28 nm process, which is larger than 65.1% of tablets and equal to 17.6% of tablets.
Internal storage
16 GB
Market range: <16 GB – >256 GB
This tablet has 16 GB of internal storage, which is less than 78.8% of tablets and equal to 14.8% of tablets.
Geekbench 6 single-core score
?
Chipset
Qualcomm Snapdragon 400
This tablet runs on Qualcomm Snapdragon 400, which is more advanced than 51.1% of tablets and equal to 1% of tablets.
Show more
What reviewers say
Screen resolution
1280×800
This tablet has a 1280×800 screen, which is less sharp than 68.1% of tablets and equal to 21.7% of tablets.
Refresh rate
60 Hz
Market range: <60 Hz – >120 Hz
This tablet has a 60 Hz screen, which is smoother than 0.1% of tablets and equal to 73.4% of tablets.
Display type
TFT LCD
This tablet uses a TFT LCD display type. 89.9% of tablets use this display technology.
Pixel density
149 ppi
Market range: <149 ppi – >291 ppi
This tablet has a pixel density of 149 ppi, which is lower than 86.8% of tablets and equal to 9.2% of tablets.
Display glass type
?
Show more
What reviewers say
Optical image stabilization
no
This tablet does not support optical stabilisation. 0.4% of tablets offer this.
Main camera megapixels
3.15 MP
Market range: <3.15 MP – >13 MP
This tablet has a rear camera with 3.15 MP resolution, which is lower than 89.8% of tablets and equal to 2.6% of tablets.
Front camera megapixels
1.3 MP
Market range: <1.2 MP – >9 MP
This tablet has a front camera with 1.3 MP resolution, which is lower than 80.9% of tablets and equal to 5.4% of tablets.
Main camera aperture
f/2.8
This tablet has a main camera aperture of f/2.8, which is narrower than 89.6% of tablets and equal to 3.1% of tablets.
Optical zoom
1xxx
This tablet has 1xx optical zoom, which is stronger than 18.2% of tablets and equal to 80.9% of tablets.
Show more
What reviewers say
Battery capacity
6,800 mAh
Market range: <4k mAh – >10.1k mAh
This tablet has 6,800 mAh battery capacity, which is larger than 52.1% of tablets and equal to 1% of tablets.
Charging speed
10 W
Market range: <10 W – >45 W
This tablet charges at 10 W, which is slower than 60.9% of tablets and equal to 33.3% of tablets.
Battery life
10 hours
Market range: <7 hours – >16 hours
This tablet has a battery life of 10 hours, which is longer than that of 39.1% of tablets and equal to that of 20.5% of tablets.
video playback
Wireless charging
no
This tablet does not support wireless charging. 1.5% of tablets offer this.
Fast charging
no
This tablet does not support fast charging. 56.9% of tablets offer this.
Show more
What reviewers say
LTE support
no
This tablet does not have built-in LTE. 42.9% of tablets offer this.
Wi-Fi connectivity
yes
This tablet connects to Wi-Fi. 0.2% of tablets offer this.
GPS
yes
This tablet has built-in GPS. 17.1% of tablets offer this.
5G connectivity
no
This tablet does not support 5G. 8.1% of tablets offer this.
NFC
no
This tablet does not include NFC. 10.8% of tablets offer this.
Show more
Operating system
Android
This tablet uses the Android operating system, which is more advanced than the one used by 23.2%.
Update support duration
medium
This tablet offers medium update support, which is longer than the support period of 47.6% of tablets and equal to that of 32.4% of tablets.
Direct OS updates
yes
This tablet supports direct OS updates. 20.3% of tablets offer this.
On-device AI
no
This tablet does not support on-device AI. 28.3% of tablets support this capability.
App tracking protection
no
This tablet does not support app tracking protection. 28.4% of tablets offer this.
Show more
IP rating
not rated
This tablet's IP rating is not rated, which is less protected than 16.5% of tablets and the same as 83.6% of tablets.
Weight
487 g
Market range: <315 g – >730 g
This tablet weighs 487 g, which is lighter than 51.7% of tablets and equal to 0.2% of tablets.
Backlit keyboard
no
This tablet does not support a backlit keyboard. 9.7% of tablets support backlit keyboards.
Keyboard accessory
yes
This tablet supports a keyboard accessory. 15.8% of tablets support this option.
Pen latency
N/A
Show more
What reviewers say
Number of microphones
1
Market range: <1 – >3
This tablet has a microphone array of 1, which is more than 0.2% of tablets and equal to 54.8% of tablets.
aptX Adaptive
no
This tablet does not support aptX Adaptive. 6.9% of tablets offer this.
Dolby Atmos support
no
This tablet does not support Dolby Atmos. 31.3% of tablets support Dolby Atmos.
N. of speakers
2
Market range: <2 – >4
This tablet includes 2 speakers, which is more than in 9.8% of tablets and equal to the number in 60.8% of tablets.
FM radio
no
This tablet does not include an FM radio. 19% of tablets offer this.
Show more
What reviewers say

Samsung Galaxy Tab 4 10.1 WiFi (5GB + 16GB) vs the average tablet

246810TotalPerformanceDisplayCameraBatteryConnectivitySoftwareDesignAudio
  • More advanced chipset
    This tablet has a more advanced chipset than the average tablet (Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 vs MediaTek MT8169A).
    Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 vs MediaTek MT8169A
  • More advanced graphics
    This tablet has more advanced graphics than the average tablet (Adreno 305 vs Mali-G51).
    Adreno 305 vs Mali-G51
  • Supports slow-motion video
    This tablet supports slow-motion recording, while the average tablet does not. 37.3% of tablets support slow-motion recording.
  • More advanced chipset
    This tablet has a more advanced chipset than the average tablet (Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 vs MediaTek MT8169A).
    Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 vs MediaTek MT8169A
  • More advanced graphics
    This tablet has more advanced graphics than the average tablet (Adreno 305 vs Mali-G51).
    Adreno 305 vs Mali-G51
  • Supports slow-motion video
    This tablet supports slow-motion recording, while the average tablet does not. 37.3% of tablets support slow-motion recording.
  • 3.7 MP lower front resolution
    This tablet has a lower-resolution front camera than the average tablet (1.3 MP vs 5 MP). The average tablet has a front camera of 5 MP.
    1.3 MP vs 5 MP
  • 28.6% lower review score
    Reviews score
    5.0/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
    How we count it
    Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves. Big test sites count more, short reviews half as much as full tests. A video review counts half.
    Score: The average grade is 80% of the review mark; the number of reviews is the other 20% (1 review = 5, the typical number in this category = 8, the most-reviewed model = 10).
    Enough data: With few reviews, the average grade is pulled toward the typical grade of this category. No reviews yet: 7.4 for now.
    Share: Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
    Score distribution
    â–¼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    â–¼ Worse than 91% of models

    5.0

    Mark 7.7 is below the typical mark 7.8 of this category, so it cannot lift the score above the technical score

    80%

    7.6

    Average grade

    20%

    8.5

    Popularity

    Grades by review (22)
    13 reviews: 8 with a printed score, 5 estimated from the review. 9 video reviews, each counting half as much as a written test. Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
    User ratings collected online are not part of this score.
    5.0 vs 7.0
  • Inferior display type
    This tablet has an inferior display type compared to the average tablet (TFT LCD vs IPS LCD). 0.00% of tablets use the superior display type.
    TFT LCD vs IPS LCD
  • No USB-C port
    This tablet does not have a USB Type-C port, while the average tablet does. 54% of tablets have one.
  • 4 fewer CPU threads
    This tablet has fewer CPU threads than the average tablet (4 vs 8). The average tablet has 8 CPU threads.
    4 vs 8
  • 4.85 MP lower rear resolution
    This tablet has a lower-resolution rear camera than the average tablet (3.2 MP vs 8 MP). The average tablet has a rear camera of 8 MP.
    3.15 MP vs 8 MP
  • No fast charging
    This tablet does not support fast charging, while the average tablet does. 56.8% of tablets support fast charging.
  • 40% lower CPU speed
    This tablet has a lower CPU speed than the average tablet (1.2 GHz vs 2 GHz). The average tablet has CPU speed of 2 GHz.
    1.2 GHz vs 2 GHz
  • 28.6% lower review score
    Reviews score
    5.0/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
    How we count it
    Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves. Big test sites count more, short reviews half as much as full tests. A video review counts half.
    Score: The average grade is 80% of the review mark; the number of reviews is the other 20% (1 review = 5, the typical number in this category = 8, the most-reviewed model = 10).
    Enough data: With few reviews, the average grade is pulled toward the typical grade of this category. No reviews yet: 7.4 for now.
    Share: Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
    Score distribution
    â–¼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    â–¼ Worse than 91% of models

    5.0

    Mark 7.7 is below the typical mark 7.8 of this category, so it cannot lift the score above the technical score

    80%

    7.6

    Average grade

    20%

    8.5

    Popularity

    Grades by review (22)
    13 reviews: 8 with a printed score, 5 estimated from the review. 9 video reviews, each counting half as much as a written test. Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
    User ratings collected online are not part of this score.
    5.0 vs 7.0
  • 33.3% lower sentiment score
    5.0 vs 7.5
  • 13.1% worse value for money
    Samsung Galaxy Tab 4 10.1 WiFi (5GB + 16GB) has worse value for money than the average tablet (6.67 vs 7.6).
    6.67 vs 7.55
  • 4 fewer CPU threads
    This tablet has fewer CPU threads than the average tablet (4 vs 8). The average tablet has 8 CPU threads.
    4 vs 8
  • 40% lower CPU speed
    This tablet has a lower CPU speed than the average tablet (1.2 GHz vs 2 GHz). The average tablet has CPU speed of 2 GHz.
    1.2 GHz vs 2 GHz
  • 2.5 GB less RAM
    This tablet has less RAM than the average tablet (1.5 GB vs 4 GB). The average tablet has 4 GB of RAM.
    1.5 GB vs 4 GB
  • 75% less internal storage
    This tablet has less internal storage than the average tablet (16 GB vs 64 GB). The average tablet has 64 GB of internal storage.
    16 GB vs 64 GB
  • 1,066 MHz slower RAM speed
    This tablet has a lower RAM speed than the average tablet (800 MHz vs 1,866 MHz). The average tablet has RAM speed of 1,866 MHz.
    800 MHz vs 1,866 MHz
  • 2x larger process node
    This tablet has a larger process node than the average tablet (28 nm vs 14 nm). The average tablet is built on 14 nm.
    28 nm vs 14 nm
  • 71.8% less memory bandwidth
    This tablet has less memory bandwidth than the average tablet (4.2 GB/s vs 14.9 GB/s). The average tablet has 14.9 GB/s of memory bandwidth.
    4.2 GB/s vs 14.9 GB/s
  • No big.LITTLE architecture
    This tablet does not support big.LITTLE architecture, while the average tablet does. 51.7% of tablets support big.LITTLE architecture.
  • 30.8% slower GPU clock
    This tablet runs its GPU slower than the average tablet (450 MHz vs 650 MHz). The average tablet runs its GPU at 650 MHz.
    450 MHz vs 650 MHz
  • More basic memory type
    This tablet uses less advanced memory than the average tablet (LPDDR2 vs LPDDR3).
    LPDDR2 vs LPDDR3
  • 5 years older
    This tablet was released earlier than the average tablet (2014 vs 2019). The average tablet was released in 2019.
    May 2014
    2014 vs 2019
  • Inferior display type
    This tablet has an inferior display type compared to the average tablet (TFT LCD vs IPS LCD). 0.00% of tablets use the superior display type.
    TFT LCD vs IPS LCD
  • 101 nits dimmer screen
    This tablet is dimmer than the average tablet (300 nits vs 401 nits). The average tablet reaches 401 nits.
    300 nits vs 401 nits
  • 32.6% softer screen detail
    This tablet has softer screen detail than the average tablet (149 ppi vs 221 ppi). The average tablet has a pixel density of 221 ppi.
    149 ppi vs 221 ppi
  • Less sharp display
    This tablet has a less sharp screen than the average tablet (1280×800 vs 1920×1200).
    1,280×800 vs 1,920×1,200
  • Less vivid contrast
    This tablet has less contrast than the average tablet (877:1 vs 1015:1). The average tablet has a contrast ratio of 1015:1.
    877:1 vs 1,015:1
  • 50% slower touch response
    This tablet samples touch more slowly than the average tablet (60 Hz vs 120 Hz). The average tablet samples touch at 120 Hz.
    60 Hz vs 120 Hz
  • 3.7 MP lower front resolution
    This tablet has a lower-resolution front camera than the average tablet (1.3 MP vs 5 MP). The average tablet has a front camera of 5 MP.
    1.3 MP vs 5 MP
  • 4.85 MP lower rear resolution
    This tablet has a lower-resolution rear camera than the average tablet (3.2 MP vs 8 MP). The average tablet has a rear camera of 8 MP.
    3.15 MP vs 8 MP
  • No continuous video AF
    This tablet does not support continuous video AF, the average tablet does. 57.7% of tablets support continuous video autofocus.
  • Worse main-camera video
    This tablet supports worse main-camera video recording than the average tablet (720x30 fps vs 1080x30 fps). The average tablet supports 1080x30 fps main-camera video recording.
    720x30 fps vs 1080x30 fps
  • No tap-to-focus
    This tablet does not support touch autofocus, while the average tablet does. 83% of tablets support touch autofocus.
  • No HDR photo mode
    This tablet does not have HDR photo mode, the average tablet does. 79.8% of tablets support HDR photo mode.
  • Narrower main camera aperture
    This tablet has a narrower main camera aperture than the average tablet (f/2.8 vs f/2.2). The average tablet's main camera aperture is f/2.2.
    f/2.8 vs f/2.2
  • No backside-illuminated sensor
    This tablet does not have a BSI sensor, while the average tablet does. 52.6% of tablets have a BSI sensor.
  • No timelapse video
    This tablet does not support timelapse video, while the average tablet does. 57.5% of tablets support timelapse video.
  • No fast charging
    This tablet does not support fast charging, while the average tablet does. 56.8% of tablets support fast charging.
  • 44.4% slower charging
    This tablet charges slower than the average tablet (10 W vs 18 W). The average tablet charges at 18 W.
    10 W vs 18 W
  • No USB-C port
    This tablet does not have a USB Type-C port, while the average tablet does. 54% of tablets have one.
  • Older Wi-Fi standard
    This tablet has an older Wi-Fi standard than the average tablet (Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n) vs Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac)).
    Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n) vs Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac)
  • Older Bluetooth version
    This tablet has an older Bluetooth version than the average tablet (4 vs 5).
    4 vs 5
  • No face recognition
    This tablet does not have face recognition, the average tablet does. 56.4% of tablets support face recognition.
  • No picture-in-picture mode
    This tablet does not support picture-in-picture, the average tablet does. 61.4% of tablets support picture-in-picture.
  • No camera and mic privacy
    This tablet does not support camera and mic privacy, while the average tablet does. 56.6% of tablets offer this.
  • No full-page screenshots
    This tablet does not support full-page screenshots, the average tablet does. 53% of tablets support full-page screenshots.
  • No location privacy
    This tablet does not support location privacy, while the average tablet does. 76.7% of tablets offer this.
  • No dark mode
    This tablet does not support dark mode, while the average tablet does. 57.7% of tablets offer this.
  • 43.4 mm taller
    This tablet is taller than the average tablet (243.4 mm vs 200 mm). The average tablet is 200 mm tall.
    243.4 mm vs 200 mm

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

7.0
HCORP TV 7.0
≈ estimated
11/09/2024
Hands-on review · everyday apps and daily use on an old tablet
Verdict
Samsung Galaxy Tab 4 10.1 WiFi is usable for media, social apps and reading despite its age and slowness.
9.0
korguenkomodo
≈ estimated
26/07/2014
Hands-on review · benchmark, apps and games
Verdict
Samsung Galaxy Tab 4 10.1 WiFi offers good performance and battery life, though its cameras are weak.
8.0
Android Authority
≈ estimated
21/05/2014
Hands-on review · battery, performance and camera tests
Verdict
Samsung Galaxy Tab 4 10.1 WiFi is a decent mid-range tablet with strong battery life, though its hardware and camera are modest.
7.0
DetroitBORG
≈ estimated
14/05/2014
Unboxing and review · price, speakers and performance
Verdict
Samsung Galaxy Tab 4 10.1 WiFi is a bargain large tablet for buyers who can accept its low screen resolution and weak cameras.
7.0
91mobiles
≈ estimated
30/07/2014
First look · box contents and first impressions
Verdict
Samsung Galaxy Tab 4 10.1 WiFi has a decent build and a reasonably crisp screen with no lag so far; a full review is still to come.
8.0
UFC SuperFan
≈ estimated
20/05/2014
First look · unboxing and first impressions
Verdict
Samsung Galaxy Tab 4 10.1 WiFi is light, sleek and fast so far, with a very nice feel, though these are only first impressions.
Not graded
Hands-on video, no verdict
Hands-on video, no verdict
Hands-on video, no verdict
Hands-on video, no verdict
Shop video

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

6.0
pcmag.com
✓ explicit
24/07/2014
Review · Big-screen Android tablet
Verdict
The Galaxy Tab 4 10.1 is a steady, well-built big-screen Android tablet with an outdated display, and better values exist unless you are a Samsung loyalist.
8.0
mobiletechreview.com
≈ estimated
03/06/2014
Hands-on review · Thin 10-inch tablet
Verdict
The Galaxy Tab 4 10.1 is a light, sharp 10-inch Android tablet with a built-in TV remote that suits everyday users, but serious gamers and LTE buyers should look elsewhere.
7.0
wired.com
✓ explicit
09/02/2015
Review · Slim everyday tablet
Verdict
The Galaxy Tab 4 10.1 is a slim, sturdy tablet with a battery that lasts nearly two days, but its weak cameras and lack of waterproofing hold it back.
8.2
notebookcheck.net
✓ explicit
24/06/2014
Lab test · Display and performance
Verdict
The Galaxy Tab 4 10.1 is an inexpensive Samsung tablet with good viewing angles and no app stutters, but grey blacks, glare and pale colours hold it back.
8.0
androidauthority.com
≈ estimated
21/05/2014
Hands-on review · Midrange 10-inch tablet
Verdict
The Galaxy Tab 4 10.1 is a light midrange tablet with loud side speakers and multi-day battery life, held back by its ordinary screen and TouchWiz.
7.4
computerbild.de
✓ explicit
03/06/2014
Lab test · Quick mid-range tablet
Verdict
The Galaxy Tab 4 10.1 is a fast tablet that lasts about 15 hours, but its dated display and weak cameras hold it back.
6.8
pcwelt.de
✓ explicit
18/09/2014
Lab test · Light mid-range tablet
Verdict
The Galaxy Tab 4 10.1 is light and thin and handles everyday tasks well, but its screen and video battery life are only average.
8.0
connect.de
≈ estimated
07/07/2014
Lab test · LTE tablet
Verdict
The Galaxy Tab 4 10.1 LTE is easy to use and lasts long on one charge, but its screen fades in sunlight and looks rougher beside premium Samsung models.
8.2
notebookcheck.com
✓ explicit
23/06/2014
Lab test · Performance and games
Verdict
The Galaxy Tab 4 10.1 runs current games such as FIFA 14 and Real Racing 3 smoothly, but its graphics may struggle as tougher games arrive.
6.2
01net.com
✓ explicit
21/07/2014
Hands-on test · Family tablet
Verdict
The Galaxy Tab 4 10.1 is a family-friendly 10-inch tablet with smooth HD video, but its blurry screen and weak cameras keep it from excelling.
7.5
android-mt.ouest-france.fr
✓ explicit
19/08/2014
Full review · Entry-level 10-inch tablet
Verdict
The Galaxy Tab 4 10.1 suits buyers who want 4G and long battery life, but its soft screen and weak camera make it only a small step up.
8.0
smartworld.it
≈ estimated
17/06/2014
Hands-on review · Wi-Fi tablet
Verdict
The Samsung Galaxy Tab 4 10.1 Wi-Fi is a light, snappy tablet with automatic brightness, but its camera and fingerprint-prone glass let it down.
8.0
tuttoapp-android.com
≈ estimated
03/09/2015
Hands-on test · Home tablet
Verdict
The Samsung Galaxy Tab 4 10.1 suits home use: it is light and compact, but its screen and camera are weak.

Third-party reviews

What customers like about Samsung Galaxy Tab 4 10.1 WiFi (5GB + 16GB)

  • Long battery life that can last several days with light use
  • Lightweight and slim design making it portable and comfortable to hold
  • User-friendly interface and easy initial setup
  • Good overall build quality with a faux leather texture that resists fingerprints
  • Consistent and reliable performance for everyday tasks like web browsing and video playback
  • Improved dual-speaker setup providing clear audio

What customers don't like about Samsung Galaxy Tab 4 10.1 WiFi (5GB + 16GB)

  • Low screen resolution (1280 x 800) resulting in visible pixels and an outdated feel
  • Poor camera quality with a fixed-focus 3MP rear camera that lacks a flash
  • Occasional performance lag, particularly during heavy multitasking or web browsing on Chrome
  • Known issues with intermittent WiFi connection drops reported by some users
  • Limited internal RAM (1.5GB) can hinder high-end gaming or intensive productivity apps
  • Device can occasionally overheat during extended use, triggering app closures

Verdict

The Samsung Galaxy Tab 4 10.1 is a mid-range Android tablet featuring a 10.1-inch WXGA TFT display with a 1280 x 800 resolution and a 16:10 aspect ratio. It is powered by a 1.2 GHz quad-core Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 processor paired with 1.5GB of RAM and 16GB of internal storage, which is expandable via a microSD slot up to 64GB. Key characteristics include a lightweight 485g design with a textured faux-leather back, a 6,800 mAh battery providing up to 10 hours of use, and dual side-facing stereo speakers. Main pros are its solid build quality, reliable performance for casual multitasking, and the inclusion of an IR blaster for use as a universal remote. However, it is held back by a relatively low-resolution display (149 ppi), mediocre 3MP rear and 1.3MP front cameras, and a slow charging time.

Compare Samsung Galaxy Tab 4 10.1 WiFi (5GB + 16GB) with other tablets

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Samsung Galaxy Tab 4 10.1 WiFi (5GB + 16GB) and other tablets

No results found