Samsung Galaxy Tab 3 3G (1GB + 32GB) review. Compare 168 technical specifications and user reviews to see how it ranks among tablets and if it is worth buying.
Overall score
What it is: An overall evaluation of the smartphone's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters: When you need a quick reference to identify the best Tablets on the market.
Score components:
90.0%
Technical Score
10.0%
User score
Technical Score
What it is: An assessment of the smartphone's technical performance, covering eight key areas: performance & hardware, software, camera, connectivity, display, battery, audio, and design.
When it matters: When you want to compare Tablets based on technical performance and available features.
Score components:
22.0%
Performance
20.0%
Display
16.0%
Camera
14.0%
Battery
12.0%
Connectivity
8.0%
Software & Features
5.0%
Design
3.0%
Audio & Multimedia
User score
What it is: A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the smartphone
When it matters: When you want to know how a smartphone handles daily tasks and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
Score components:
70.0%
User reviews
30.0%
Popularity
No reviews for this version.
Check reviews from other versions.
Score components:
25.0%
RAM capacity
20.0%
Refresh rate
20.0%
GPU frequency
20.0%
Chipset
15.0%
Battery capacity
Score components:
20.0%
Chipset
20.0%
Battery life
20.0%
RAM capacity
10.0%
Weight
10.0%
Internal storage
10.0%
Keyboard accessory
10.0%
Screen size
Score components:
30.0%
RAM capacity
25.0%
Chipset
20.0%
Internal storage
15.0%
Screen size
5.0%
Keyboard accessory
5.0%
Stylus included
Score components:
20.0%
Screen size
20.0%
Battery life
20.0%
Weight
20.0%
RAM capacity
20.0%
Chipset
Score components:
25.0%
Battery capacity
25.0%
RAM capacity
15.0%
Weight
15.0%
Internal storage
10.0%
Screen size
10.0%
Price
Score components:
20.0%
RAM capacity
20.0%
Battery life
15.0%
Chipset
15.0%
Weight
10.0%
Cellular module
10.0%
5G connectivity
5.0%
GPS
5.0%
Internal storage
Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).
All: ranking among all products in the database.
#125 in Best Samsung Tablets
#494 in Best Tablets With SIM Card
#574 in Best Android Tablets
#609 in Best Tablets With Keyboard
#790 in Best Tablets
What it is: An assessment of the smartphone's technical performance, covering eight key areas: performance & hardware, software, camera, connectivity, display, battery, audio, and design.
When it matters: When you want to compare Tablets based on technical performance and available features.
Score components:
22.0%
Performance
20.0%
Display
16.0%
Camera
14.0%
Battery
12.0%
Connectivity
8.0%
Software & Features
5.0%
Design
3.0%
Audio & Multimedia
What it is: A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the smartphone
When it matters: When you want to know how a smartphone handles daily tasks and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
Score components:
70.0%
User reviews
30.0%
Popularity
No reviews for this version.
Check reviews from other versions.
What it is: An indicator that combines the smartphone's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters: When you are looking for a smartphone with a good balance between quality and price.
Score components:
60.0%
Overall score
40.0%
Price
Importance: MEDIUM
Importance: HIGH
Good value: >=8 GB
Importance: HIGH
Good value: <7 nm
Importance: HIGH
Good value: >=128 GB
Importance: HIGH
Good value: >1300
Importance: HIGH
Importance: HIGH
Importance: HIGH
Importance: MEDIUM
Good value: >3500
Importance: MEDIUM
Good value: >=8 GB
Importance: MEDIUM
Good value: 5
Importance: MEDIUM
Good value: >20 GB/s
Importance: MEDIUM
Importance: MEDIUM
Good value: >7 W
Importance: MEDIUM
Good value: >2500
Importance: MEDIUM
Good value: >800
Importance: MEDIUM
Good value: >8
Importance: MEDIUM
Good value: >900 MHz
Importance: MEDIUM
Importance: MEDIUM
Good value: >3000
Importance: MEDIUM
Good value: >1200
Importance: MEDIUM
Good value: >3200 MHz
Importance: MEDIUM
Good value: >400
Importance: MEDIUM
Importance: MEDIUM
Good value: 8+
Importance: MEDIUM
Importance: MEDIUM
Good value: >800 MHz
Importance: MEDIUM
Importance: MEDIUM
Importance: MEDIUM
Good value: >10000 million
Importance: LOW
Good value: >=4 MB
Importance: LOW
Good value: >64 KB
Importance: LOW
Good value: >=1 MB
Importance: LOW
Importance: LOW
Good value: 4
Importance: LOW
Good value: >=512 GB
Importance: LOW
Good value: 2.0/3.0
Importance: LOW
Good value: 3.2
Importance: LOW
Good value: 3.3
Importance: HIGH
Importance: HIGH
Good value: >=120 Hz
Importance: HIGH
Importance: HIGH
Good value: >250 ppi
Importance: HIGH
Importance: MEDIUM
Good value: >500 nits
Importance: MEDIUM
Good value: >=11 inches
Importance: MEDIUM
Importance: MEDIUM
Good value: >120 Hz
Importance: MEDIUM
Importance: MEDIUM
Importance: MEDIUM
Importance: MEDIUM
Good value: >200 Hz
Importance: MEDIUM
Good value: >250 ppi
Importance: MEDIUM
Good value: >400 nits
Importance: MEDIUM
Importance: LOW
Importance: LOW
Importance: LOW
Importance: HIGH
Importance: HIGH
Importance: HIGH
Good value: >=8 MP
Importance: HIGH
Importance: HIGH
Importance: MEDIUM
Importance: MEDIUM
Importance: MEDIUM
Importance: MEDIUM
Importance: LOW
Importance: LOW
Importance: LOW
Importance: LOW
Importance: LOW
Importance: LOW
Importance: LOW
Importance: LOW
Importance: LOW
Importance: LOW
Importance: LOW
Importance: LOW
Importance: LOW
Importance: LOW
Importance: LOW
Importance: LOW
Importance: LOW
Importance: LOW
Importance: LOW
Importance: LOW
Importance: LOW
Importance: LOW
Importance: LOW
Importance: HIGH
Good value: >8000 mAh
Importance: HIGH
Good value: >30 W
Importance: HIGH
Good value: >10 hours
Importance: MEDIUM
Importance: MEDIUM
Importance: LOW
Importance: LOW
Importance: HIGH
Importance: HIGH
Importance: HIGH
Importance: MEDIUM
Importance: MEDIUM
Importance: MEDIUM
Importance: MEDIUM
Importance: MEDIUM
Importance: MEDIUM
Importance: MEDIUM
Importance: MEDIUM
Importance: MEDIUM
Importance: MEDIUM
Importance: LOW
Good value: >5.2
Importance: LOW
Importance: LOW
Importance: LOW
Good value: 3.1/3.2
Importance: LOW
Importance: LOW
Importance: LOW
Importance: LOW
Importance: LOW
Importance: LOW
Importance: LOW
Importance: LOW
Importance: LOW
Importance: HIGH
Importance: HIGH
Importance: HIGH
Importance: MEDIUM
Importance: MEDIUM
Importance: MEDIUM
Importance: MEDIUM
Importance: MEDIUM
Importance: MEDIUM
Importance: MEDIUM
Importance: MEDIUM
Importance: LOW
Importance: LOW
Importance: LOW
Importance: LOW
Importance: LOW
Importance: LOW
Importance: LOW
Importance: LOW
Importance: LOW
Importance: LOW
Importance: MEDIUM
Importance: MEDIUM
Good value: <500 g
Importance: MEDIUM
Importance: MEDIUM
Importance: MEDIUM
Good value: <10 ms
Importance: MEDIUM
Good value: >7
Importance: MEDIUM
Importance: MEDIUM
Importance: LOW
Good value: <7 mm
Importance: LOW
Importance: LOW
Importance: LOW
Importance: LOW
Importance: LOW
Importance: MEDIUM
Good value: >=2
Importance: MEDIUM
Importance: MEDIUM
Importance: MEDIUM
Good value: >=4
Importance: LOW
Importance: LOW
Importance: LOW
Importance: LOW
Importance: LOW
Importance: LOW
Importance: LOW
Importance: LOW
Importance: LOW
Importance: MEDIUM
Good value: >500 nits
Importance: MEDIUM
Importance: MEDIUM
Importance: HIGH
Good value: >=8 GB
Importance: HIGH
Good value: >=8 MP
Importance: HIGH
Importance: MEDIUM
Importance: LOW
Importance: HIGH
Good value: <7 nm
Importance: MEDIUM
The Verge's review characterizes the Samsung Galaxy Tab 3 8.0 and 10.1 as functional but uninspired, featuring plastic-heavy, "forgettable" designs. The 8-inch model shines with a light, comfortable build, great screen for media, and useful IR blaster, though it suffers from disappointing standby battery life. Conversely, the 10.1-inch version offers good active battery life and an Intel processor, but is marred by jittery performance, slow app loading, and a mediocre camera. Ultimately, with neither tablet offering compelling value over competitors like the iPad mini or Nexus 10, the review concludes these devices feel released merely to fill a product slot. The Verge
The TechRadar review describes the Samsung Galaxy Tab 3 7.0 as an unremarkable, overpriced device that fails to advance beyond its predecessor. While featuring a solid, lightweight build and a microSD slot for expansion, the tablet is held back by a low-resolution display and weak performance. Key disadvantages highlighted include sluggish processing, a poor camera, and a high price point that makes it hard to recommend against competitors.
Nate’s review on The Digital Reader highlights the Samsung Galaxy Tab 3 7.0 as a highly portable and well-built budget tablet, praising its ergonomic design and superior touchscreen sensitivity. While the screen resolution is criticized by many as "pixelated," the review notes good viewing angles and color quality for the price point. Key downsides include "flaky" performance with occasional screen flickering, a weak CPU, and significant bloatware that reduces storage. The device's strongest asset is its nine-hour-plus battery life, making it a viable option for users prioritizing longevity over raw performance.
The Android Central review of the Samsung Galaxy Tab 3 series describes the 7-, 8-, and 10.1-inch tablets as safe, incremental updates that offer a familiar user experience and comfortable, lightweight designs. Key pros include excellent two-day battery life and the inclusion of an IR blaster for controlling home entertainment systems. However, the review highlights significant cons, including "pedestrian" performance with noticeable lag and a noisy camera that struggles in low light. Furthermore, the TouchWiz interface is criticized for feeling like an "oversized smartphone" rather than a truly optimized tablet experience. Ultimately, while the Galaxy Tab 3 line is deemed a reasonable choice for Samsung loyalists, it fails to innovate in a market where competitors offer better specifications for the price. The review suggests looking toward the Galaxy Note line for a more premium experience.
The Samsung Galaxy Tab 3 7.0 is a budget-friendly, portable tablet featuring a design, slim build, and narrow bezels heavily influenced by the Galaxy S4. While the 7-inch WSVGA display is bright, its low 1024 x 600 resolution and 170 ppi pixel density are notable drawbacks, especially compared to competitors like the Nexus 7. Powered by a 1.2GHz dual-core processor and 1GB of RAM, the tablet handles basic tasks on Android 4.1.2 with TouchWiz, though it struggles with high-end gaming and multitasking. The device suffers from limited internal storage, making the microSD expansion slot essential, while the 3-megapixel rear camera lacks flash and autofocus. A key advantage is the inclusion of an IR blaster and the Peel Smart Remote app for universal remote functionality, making it a capable, compact device for light media consumption and web browsing. Overall, it serves as a functional, portable option, even if it lacks the performance of more premium devices.
Coty Beasley’s review on Medium describes the Samsung Galaxy Tab 3 10.1 as a lightweight but mediocre, 17.99 oz device with a "cheap" plastic build that suffers from warping. While praised for its portability and comfort, the tablet is heavily criticized for a "fuzzy" 1,280 x 800 display, inconsistent touch response, and laggy, bloatware-heavy software. Ultimately, the review cites poor performance, inferior build quality, and an uninspiring, "just okay" user experience as major cons, recommending alternatives like the Nexus 10, notes Medium. Medium
The Samsung Galaxy Tab 3 10.1-inch is characterized as a lightweight, "middle-of-the-road" device that prioritizes a sleek design over high-end performance, featuring a 10.1-inch 1280x800 display and a 1.6GHz dual-core Intel Atom processor. Key advantages include its portability, excellent battery life, expandable storage, and an IR blaster for home entertainment control. However, the tablet suffers from underwhelming performance, over-sensitive navigation buttons, and a weak 3.2MP rear camera that lacks autofocus.
The Laptop Mag review of the Samsung Galaxy Tab 3 8.0 highlights its slim, 0.28-inch design and lightweight 11.1-ounce build, making it highly portable. Key positives include a bright 1280 x 800 display and useful features like an IR blaster with the Peel Smart Remote app. Performance-wise, the 1.5-GHz dual-core Exynos processor and 1.5GB of RAM provide a responsive experience, enhanced by useful features like Multi Window mode. The battery life is strong, lasting 8 hours and 39 minutes on tests. However, the tablet suffers from harsh, easily muffled bottom-edge speakers and only average camera quality. Additionally, the $299 price point is high for its performance tier compared to competitors, making it a solid but not essential device.
The PhoneArena review characterizes the Samsung Galaxy Tab 3 8-inch as a highly portable, lightweight Android tablet with an 8-inch, 1280 x 800 display. Key features include the inclusion of an IR blaster for TV control, Samsung's TouchWiz UI, and a 1.5GHz dual-core Exynos processor. While suitable for basic tasks and media consumption, the device is criticized for performance lag, poor speaker placement, and a 5-megapixel camera that performs poorly in low light.
The Samsung Galaxy Tab 3 10.1-inch is a mid-range tablet recognized for its lightweight, compact design with thin bezels, making it comfortable to hold. Key pros include a bright, vibrant 10.1-inch TFT LCD screen, an IR blaster for remote functionality, and 64GB of expandable storage. However, the tablet suffers from significant cons, particularly its dated 1.6GHz dual-core Intel Atom CPU and limited 1GB of RAM, which results in noticeable lag and sluggish performance. Furthermore, the screen's 1,280x800 resolution falls short of competitors, and the capacitive buttons are overly sensitive, causing frequent accidental touches. Ultimately, despite its "cute and compact" design, the device's high launch price and performance limitations make it difficult to recommend over superior alternatives, as noted in the CNET review.
The PCMag review characterizes the Samsung Galaxy Tab 3 10.1 as a "pedestrian" update that struggles to justify its $399.99 price, featuring a thin, lightweight design with a standard micro USB port and an IR blaster. However, it is criticized for a low-resolution 1,280-by-800 TFT display and mediocre performance from its 1.6GHz dual-core Intel Atom processor. Key drawbacks include the absence of the Multi Window feature found on smaller models, poor multitasking performance, and underwhelming battery life compared to competitors like the Google Nexus 10. Additionally, the tablet's 3.2-megapixel rear camera is described as producing poor, washed-out images, while the microSD card slot is difficult to access. Ultimately, the review concludes the device is an overpriced, incremental upgrade not recommended over other, more capable, or lower-priced tablets.
The TechRadar review of the Samsung Galaxy Tab 3 8.0 praises its fantastic, slim, and portable design, making it highly comfortable for one-handed use. However, the device is criticized for a "plasticky" build quality that feels less premium than competitors and is deemed overpriced, exceeding the cost of the iPad mini at launch. Technically, the tablet struggles with a "meagre" dual-core 1.5GHz Exynos processor, leading to noticeable sluggishness and stuttering in daily use compared to flagships of the same era. While the 8-inch TFT display is commended for its high brightness and vibrant colors, its lower resolution keeps it from competing with top-tier screens. Ultimately, the review finds that while the tablet offers good battery life (around 8 hours of heavy use) and useful features like MultiWindow, these pros are overshadowed by poor performance and poor value for money. The combination of underpowered hardware and a high price point resulted in a lukewarm recommendation.
The Samsung Galaxy Tab 3 7-inch is a budget-friendly, highly portable device featuring a compact design with thin side bezels, a microSD card slot, and optional cellular capabilities. However, the tablet suffers from a low-resolution 1024×600 display, resulting in poor text sharpness and high reflectivity. Performance is driven by a modest dual-core processor that handles basic tasks well but struggles with heavy multitasking, although the 4,000 mAh battery provides respectable longevity.
The Samsung Galaxy Tab 3 8.0 is a mid-range, lightweight tablet featuring a portable design, an 8-inch display with 1280-by-800 resolution, and a 1.5GHz dual-core processor, suited for daily tasks and "Multi Window" multitasking. While it boasts long battery life, a microSD slot, and an infrared blaster for remote functionality, the device is hindered by a 1.3-megapixel front camera, mediocre, grainy photo quality, and a 5-megapixel rear camera. Despite its utility for media consumption, the plastic construction feels cheap, and the initial high price point makes it less competitive against alternatives like the Nexus 7 or iPad mini. For a detailed analysis, visit the original PCMag review.
The Recombu review of the Samsung Galaxy Tab 3 7.0 highlights a portable, comfortable device designed for one-handed use, featuring a compact design with reduced side bezels. While praised for its ergonomic design, the tablet is criticized for a lackluster 7-inch display with low resolution and poor contrast. Performance is described as adequate for basic tasks, running on a 1.2GHz dual-core processor, but struggles with demanding applications. Pros include a microSD card slot for expandable storage and impressive battery life, while cons include limited internal storage and a lack of NFC. Ultimately, the device is considered a suitable, though slightly dated, option for casual media consumption compared to rivals like the Google Nexus 7.
Trusted Reviews describes the Samsung Galaxy Tab 3 7.0 as a "deeply unremarkable" 7-inch tablet, noting it lacks the performance and display quality to compete with rivals like the Nexus 7. While it features a lightweight, 300g design with a microSD card slot for expanded storage, the 8GB internal storage is constrained, and the 10mm-thick plastic build feels relatively chunky. Trusted ReviewsThe 1024 x 600 resolution display is criticized for being dated, offering poor pixel density, inaccurate colors, and disappointing response times with noticeable motion trails. Performance is equally mediocre, driven by a dual-core processor that struggles with multitasking, although general navigation of the TouchWiz interface remains functional. Despite offering surprisingly loud speakers and a competitive 4,000 mAh battery capable of around 9 hours of video playback, the device is deemed overpriced and underpowered. The 3-megapixel rear camera lacks autofocus, and the overall, outdated specifications make it difficult to recommend compared to contemporary alternatives.
The Pocket-lint review characterises the Samsung Galaxy Tab 3 8.0 as a capable but overpriced 2013 contender, highlighting a slim, lightweight design and a usable 1280 x 800 resolution screen. Key pros include a microSD card slot for storage expansion, decent battery life of over eight hours in testing, and the inclusion of Samsung's Multi-Window view for productivity. Conversely, cons focus on a plasticky, premium-priced construction and mediocre performance compared to rivals like the Nexus 7.
The Samsung Galaxy Tab 3 10.1 is a lightweight, 510g tablet featuring a 10.1-inch, 1280x800 TFT LCD screen that provides high brightness and good color saturation. Its primary strengths include this bright display and excellent battery life, making it a comfortable, portable media device, despite having average resolution for its class. Performance is a major drawback, with the 1.6GHz Intel Atom processor and 1GB of RAM often struggling to keep up with daily tasks. Users may experience sluggishness, UI lag, and stuttering during app switching or multitasking. Critics often found the hardware outdated compared to competitors at the time of its release. Physical design elements are mixed; while an IR blaster is a useful inclusion, the capacitive buttons are overly sensitive, often resulting in accidental input. Additionally, the glossy plastic chassis is prone to smudges and scratches. Overall, it is considered an underwhelming device that struggled to compete with rivals, particularly the Nexus 10.
The Samsung Galaxy Tab 3 8.0 is a lightweight, portable mid-range tablet featuring a comfortable, single-handed design with a vibrant 8-inch WXGA display. A major pro is the high-quality screen, while a notable con is the bottom-firing speaker placement that gets easily muffled. Driven by a 1.5 GHz dual-core processor, the device excels at daily tasks and includes useful features like Multi Window mode and an IR blaster, though it can suffer from performance lags under heavy load. Battery life is a strong point, offering 8-10 hours of usage, paired with expandable microSD storage. However, the tablet faces criticism for its high price point relative to rivals like the Nexus 7 and a somewhat uninspired, plastic design.
Hardwareluxx reviewed the Samsung Galaxy Tab 3 lineup—7.0, 8.0, and 10.1-inch models—identifying them as solid, highly portable mid-range devices with familiar, lightweight plastic designs. While all models offer bright displays, microSD expansion, and respectable battery life, the series suffers from inconsistent performance and low, aging screen resolutions, particularly on the 7.0 and 10.1-inch versions, which frequently lag due to limited RAM. The 8.0-inch model is deemed the superior choice for its better display sharpness (189 ppi) and balanced performance, whereas the Intel-powered 10.1-inch model struggles with performance, and the 7.0-inch model is limited by a low-resolution screen. Key pros include the lightweight, portable design, decent screen brightness with good viewing angles, and the inclusion of IR blasters. Cons highlighted by the review include the 1GB RAM causing performance issues on the 7.0/10.1 models, low pixel density on two models, and the slippery, fingerprint-prone "hyperglaze" plastic casing.
The Samsung Galaxy Tab 3 10.1 features a thinner, lighter design, moving to a 1.6GHz dual-core Intel Atom processor for better web browsing and video streaming, though it struggles with heavy multitasking. Key pros include a functional IR blaster for home entertainment and solid battery life, while cons include a low-resolution 1280 x 800 display that makes text look fuzzy, along with a mediocre camera. Running Android 4.2.2 with TouchWiz, the tablet lacks the Multi Window feature found on smaller models and is criticized for an overly sensitive capacitive button design. For a detailed review, see the analysis at CNET.
The Samsung Galaxy Tab 3 7.0 (2013) is a compact, budget-friendly tablet praised for its slim, lightweight design and over 9 hours of battery life, making it highly portable. Key advantages include a responsive touchscreen and a microSD slot, although the 8GB internal storage is limited. However, the device is criticized for a low-resolution 1024 x 600 display that causes visible pixelation. Performance is rated as mediocre due to a dual-core 1.2 GHz processor, which struggles with demanding applications. Overall, while functional for basic tasks, the 2013 review indicates the tablet was considered overpriced, with competitors like the 2013 Nexus 7 offering better value and performance at the time.
The Samsung Galaxy Tab 3 10.1, reviewed by connect.de, is a mid-range tablet prioritizing a lightweight, 8mm thick design and high-brightness display over top-tier performance. Key features include a useful infrared (IR) blaster for home entertainment control and solid battery life, though it suffers from significant lag due to an outdated dual-core processor and limited 1GB RAM. While adequate for casual use, the 1280 x 800 resolution is low for its class, and oversensitive capacitive buttons often cause accidental input, making it a functional yet dated option.
The Samsung Galaxy Tab 3 10.1 is a mid-range 10.1-inch tablet featuring a slim, lightweight, and compact plastic design, offering an IR blaster for home entertainment control. However, the device is plagued by a 1280x800 TFT screen with low pixel density, weak performance due to limited 1GB RAM, and a lackluster 3.1-megapixel fixed-focus camera. Despite its drawbacks, the tablet boasts good battery life, loud speakers, and microSD storage, though it was largely considered overpriced at launch compared to its specs.
The Samsung Galaxy Tab 3 10.1 (GT-P5200) is recognized for its high-quality, lightweight design and excellent equipment, including a 3G module, microSD slot, and phone functionality. While the 10.1-inch display offers good brightness and contrast, the device is severely limited by poor battery life, lasting only 5 hours in tests, and equally slow charging times. Driven by an Intel Atom Z2560 processor, the tablet provides smooth, lag-free performance for daily tasks, though its price-performance ratio may not appeal to all users, according to the CHIP.de review.
The Samsung Galaxy Tab 3 series (7.0, 8.0, 10.1) offers a lightweight, thin design with bright displays and practical microSD storage expansion. A notable advantage is the IR blaster, allowing functionality as a universal remote via the Peel Smart Remote app. However, the tablets suffer from lackluster performance due to dated processors, leading to lag, and display resolutions that underperform compared to contemporary rivals. The plastic construction, while light, often feels cheap, and the devices are plagued by underwhelming camera quality. While the 8-inch model serves as a balanced option with useful Multi Window features, the series struggles to justify its price, often outclassed by more powerful, affordable competitors from the same era. Despite these drawbacks, the series boasts excellent, long-lasting battery life.
The Samsung Galaxy Tab 3 7.0 is a compact, third-generation tablet featuring improved ergonomics, specifically through thinner side bezels that make it easier to hold, and excellent battery life. However, the device is criticized for an outdated, low-resolution 1024 x 600 display and mediocre performance from its 1.2 GHz processor. While it includes a microSD slot and an IR blaster, the subpar camera quality and high launch price limit its appeal compared to competitors.
The Samsung Galaxy Tab 3 7.0 is an entry-level, compact tablet featuring a 7-inch display, designed for high portability and comfortable single-handed use. Pros include a solid, lightweight build, loud stereo speakers, an IR blaster, and expandable storage, along with Samsung's TouchWiz software. However, the device is held back by a low 1024 x 600 resolution display, dated dual-core performance that struggles with intensive tasks, and poor camera quality, making it feel overpriced at launch, say PhoneArena.
The PC-WELT review finds that the Samsung Galaxy Tab 3 10.1 is a solid, thinner, and lighter, yet evolutionary rather than revolutionary update, featuring a familiar plastic build with redesigned side speakers and physical, capacitive buttons. Powered by an Intel Atom Z2560 processor, the device offers fluid daily performance, though it faces minor stuttering with heavy tasks and features a functional, but average 1280x800 resolution display. Pros include improved portability, expandable microSD storage, and Android 4.2.2 functionality, while cons are centered on its budget-feeling plastic, only 1GB of RAM limiting multitasking, low-resolution screen, and accidental capacitive button activations.
The Samsung Galaxy Tab 3 8.0 is highlighted for its exceptionally portable, 7.4mm slim design and a high-contrast LCD screen, making it easy to hold with one hand. Pros include functional Samsung features like the IR blaster and useful Multi Window multitasking, though it suffers from minor touch-screen inaccuracies on the narrow bezels. While offering a solid 9-hour battery life for video, the device is hindered by high, non-competitive pricing and mediocre standby performance.
The Samsung Galaxy Tab 3 8.0 is lauded for its ergonomic, slim, and lightweight design (314g, 7.4mm), making it comfortable for one-handed use with a vibrant 8-inch, 1280x800 display. Powered by a 1.5 GHz dual-core processor and 1.5 GB of RAM, the device delivers capable performance for everyday tasks, bolstered by useful software features like Multi Window and an integrated IR blaster for home entertainment control. Despite these strengths, the device is held back by a plastic chassis prone to fingerprints, mediocre battery life compared to competitors, a 5-megapixel camera lacking a flash, and a premium price point that limits its appeal against stronger, budget-friendly alternatives.
The Samsung Galaxy Tab 3 7.0 (SM-T211) is characterized by high mobility, weighing only 300 grams with a compact 18.8 x 11.1 x 1.0 cm frame, making it comfortable for extended use. A significant pro is its battery life, which lasts over 5 hours for continuous video playback or internet browsing. However, the 1024 x 600 pixel TFT display constitutes a con, offering low resolution with noticeable bluish tint and high reflectance. Performance is considered entry-level, with a 1.2 GHz dual-core processor and 1 GB of RAM that can lag during heavy multitasking. Notably, the SM-T211 variant includes 3G support for voice calls, offering functional, basic tablet performance with an outdated Android 4.1 interface. For more details, visit CHIP.de.
The Computer Bild review of the Samsung Galaxy Tab 3 series highlights a refined, lighter design resembling the Galaxy S4 with significantly thinner, comfortable bezels. While the 8-inch and 10.1-inch models offer bright displays, the 10.1-inch version's 1280x800 resolution is deemed underwhelming. Key advantages include solid battery life, microSD expansion, and an IR blaster for remote functionality. Performance is a major drawback, with reports of lag during multitasking on the 10.1-inch Intel Atom-based model. Furthermore, the 10.1-inch version surprisingly omits the Multi Window feature found on smaller models. The cameras are described as poor quality, and the capacitive buttons are overly sensitive, causing accidental inputs. Ultimately, the review finds that while the Galaxy Tab 3 is a decent, portable option, it struggles to justify its premium price tag against more powerful competitors. It is best suited for users looking for a basic, recognizable tablet experience rather than high-end performance.
The Samsung Galaxy Tab 3 10.1 features a lightweight, thin design (approx. 510g) suitable for family use, boasting a bright 10.1-inch screen (1280x800) and good stereo speakers. While powered by an Intel Atom Z2560 processor, performance is adequate for daily tasks but lags under heavy multitasking, featuring a useful IR blaster for remote control functionality. Drawbacks include an outdated, low-resolution screen with visible pixels, oversensitive navigation buttons, and mediocre camera quality, with battery life that underperforms compared to competitors. For more details, visit Les Androïdes.
The Samsung Galaxy Tab 3 7.0 is a compact, entry-level tablet praised for its lightweight, ergonomic design and microSD storage expansion. It offers a solid 6-8 hour battery life suitable for basic tasks, but the 1024 x 600 resolution display is noted for its lack of sharpness. Performance is limited by a dual-core 1.2GHz processor, which may lag under heavy use, and the 3MP rear camera lacks autofocus. While ideal for kids or basic web browsing, the device feels dated compared to modern alternatives at the same price point. For more details, visit top-for-phone.fr.
The Samsung Galaxy Tab 3 10.1 is a lightweight, portable tablet featuring a bright, vibrant TFT LCD display and a built-in IR blaster for home entertainment control, aimed at users seeking a familiar Samsung experience. While offering a slim design and solid battery life, the device is hindered by a subpar 1280x800 resolution that renders text and images less sharp than competitors. Performance is a significant drawback, with the 1.6GHz Intel Atom processor and 1GB of RAM causing noticeable lag, while the plastic design is prone to scratches and fingerprints. For more details, visit Tomiiks.
According to the CNET France review, the Samsung Galaxy Tab 3 10.1 is a lightweight and compact device praised for its high maximum screen brightness and exceptional, long-lasting battery life. However, it suffers from significant drawbacks, including a low-resolution display, frequent lag, and overly sensitive navigation buttons. While suitable for casual users, its underpowered performance compared to competitors and poor gaming capabilities make it difficult to recommend for demanding tasks.
The Samsung Galaxy Tab 3 10.1 is described as a slim, lightweight, 10.1-inch, mid-range tablet that borrows design cues from the Galaxy S4. Key pros include its 8mm profile, 510g weight, and an IR blaster, along with a decent 1280x800 display suitable for media consumption. Performance is limited by a 1.6 GHz dual-core Intel processor and 1GB of RAM, leading to lags and slow multitasking. Further cons highlight a low-quality, 3.15-megapixel rear camera lacking autofocus, along with a plastic "Hyperglaze" finish prone to smudges. While the 6800 mAh battery provides strong longevity, the overall package is hindered by outdated performance and a premium price point.
The Frandroid review highlights the Samsung Galaxy Tab 3 8.0's thin, light design as a major pro for portability, alongside an 8-inch TFT LCD screen praised for its viewing angles despite only offering a 1280 x 800 resolution. While featuring an IR blaster for versatile remote control, the tablet is criticized for its glossy plastic build and a launch price that felt too high for its specifications. Performance is driven by a 1.5 GHz dual-core processor and 1.5 GB of RAM; it remains fluid for daily tasks but heats up during heavy use and lacks proximity sensors or LED notifications. Samsung's TouchWiz interface on Android 4.2.2 provides useful, albeit cluttered, software features. Camera performance is merely average for the segment, serving only as a basic backup, while the 4450 mAh battery offers a standard, not exceptional, 8 to 10 hours of usage. Frandroid
The Samsung Galaxy Tab 3 10.1 is described as a functional yet unremarkable tablet, featuring a refined, thin, and light design that is comfortable to hold, along with a bright PLS display [1.1]. While it includes a useful infrared blaster for acting as a universal remote, the device is held back by a low-resolution screen and performance issues due to limited RAM [1.1]. Weaknesses in the device include significant lag during multitasking and a subpar 3.15-megapixel rear camera that lacks autofocus and a flash [1.1]. The plastic, fingerprint-prone build does not justify the initial $399 price point when compared to higher-resolution competitors available at the time [1.1]. Ultimately, the 01net review concludes that the tablet offers a smooth, "bland" experience suitable for basic tasks, but lacks a compelling "killer feature." The review suggests users look toward more powerful alternatives for better value [1.1].
The Samsung Galaxy Tab 3 10.1 features a lightweight, 8mm-thin design with a bright 10.1-inch TFT display, micro SD expansion, and an IR blaster for remote control functionality. However, the tablet is severely hampered by a 1.6 GHz dual-core processor and just 1GB of RAM, leading to significant lag, while the 1280x800 resolution is low for its size. Despite excellent battery life, the device suffers from overly sensitive navigation buttons, mediocre 3.2MP cameras, and a high price-to-performance ratio compared to its era's competitors.
The Capital.fr review presents the Samsung Galaxy Tab 3 series, particularly the 10.1-inch model, as a lightweight, sleek, and bright-screened tablet designed to compete with the iPad. Pros include the inclusion of an IR blaster for home entertainment control and expandable storage via microSD. However, the 10.1-inch model is criticized for using outdated dual-core components and only 1GB of RAM, leading to frequent lag and sluggish multitasking despite its premium price. Further drawbacks include overly sensitive navigation buttons and the omission of the "multi-window" feature found in the 8-inch version. CNETThe jury verdict indicates that while sufficient for light, everyday use, the Tab 3 struggles against more powerful, better-value competitors, with the 8-inch model noted as a more balanced option in the lineup. The design, although light, feels inexpensive due to the plastic construction.
The Samsung Galaxy Tab 3 series, covering 7, 8, and 10.1-inch models, is described as a lightweight, portable entry-level line prioritizing a slim, user-friendly design over high-end performance. While the 8-inch variant is highlighted for its superior balance of features and display, the overall series is characterized as an incremental update with modest hardware improvements. Pros include an exceptionally light, "plasticky" build, bright displays with decent viewing angles, a microSD slot for expansion, and an IR blaster for TV control, coupled with the functional TouchWiz interface. Cons highlighted in reviews center on underwhelming performance with noticeable lag during heavy tasks, alongside overly sensitive capacitive buttons. The build quality, while comfortable, feels inexpensive, and the series was criticized for being overpriced at launch compared to faster, better-equipped competitors.
The Samsung Galaxy Tab 3 8.0 review from ComputerHoy highlights a highly portable 8-inch device, featuring a slim 7.4mm design and weighing just 314g for comfortable one-handed use. Its WXGA display is noted for being bright and sharp, while the inclusion of an IR blaster with WatchON software allows it to serve as an effective universal remote. The tablet also supports Samsung's Multi Window feature, allowing for productive multitasking on the, display, powered by a 1.5 GHz dual-core Exynos 4212 processor and 1.5 GB of RAM. Journal of Electronic Commerce Research | JECRDespite positive design aspects, the review cites performance bottlenecks, noting that the dual-core processor can struggle with the heavy TouchWiz UI, causing occasional stuttering. The cameras are described as mediocre, often overexposing photos and struggling in low-light environments, while the thin bezels cause, issues with accidental touch inputs. Finally, the relatively high launch price at the time of the review made it less competitive against alternatives like the Nexus 7.
In a 2013 review by tuexperto, the Samsung Galaxy Tab 3 8.0 was lauded for its highly portable design, featuring a slim 7.4mm profile and thin bezels that make one-handed use comfortable, alongside a solid 8-inch screen suitable for media consumption. Key functional advantages included a built-in IR blaster for turning the device into a universal remote and support for Samsung's Multi-Window multitasking, though the lack of a camera flash was noted. Conversely, the tablet faced criticism for sluggish performance caused by its dual-core processor, a plastic build that felt less premium, and a high launch price that made it less competitive than rivals like the Nexus 7.
The Samsung Galaxy Tab 3 8.0 is a 2013 mid-range tablet optimized for portability and media consumption, featuring a lightweight 316-gram, 7.4mm thin design and an 8-inch WXGA display with a specialized reading mode. Key pros include its high-quality display, decent 5-megapixel camera, and an infrared blaster coupled with the "WatchON" app for universal remote functionality. However, performance cons include a slow TouchWiz interface, noticeable UI lag during multitasking, and a slippery, fingerprint-prone plastic build. Copy
The Xataka Android review highlights the Samsung Galaxy Tab 3 8.0 as a highly portable, well-built 8-inch tablet with a 1280x800 display, suitable for one-handed use due to its slim 7.4mm design and thin bezels. Pros include its comfortable ergonomics, the functional Multi Window multitasking feature, and a useful IR blaster for media control. Conversely, cons include noticeable performance lag with the 1.5 GHz Exynos processor, finicky touch input, and a mediocre 5-megapixel rear camera. While offering solid battery life, the device was criticized at launch for its high price relative to rivals. Copy
The Samsung Galaxy Tab 3 8.0 features a highly portable, ergonomic design weighing 314 grams, with reduced bezels and a bright 8-inch WXGA display. Performance is powered by a 1.5 GHz dual-core processor, capable of handling daily tasks and media consumption, while an IR blaster allows for universal remote functionality. Key advantages include its lightweight build, quality screen, and "Multi Window" multitasking, though it is limited by a plastic design, lack of NFC, and mediocre camera performance.
The Samsung Galaxy Tab 3 10.1 is a mid-range tablet prioritizing a lightweight, portable design with a 10.1-inch 1280x800 TFT display, powered by an Intel Atom processor. Key advantages include its compact form factor, strong battery life, stereo speakers, microSD expansion, and a useful IR blaster. However, performance is limited by 1GB of RAM causing lag, and the screen resolution is low by competitive standards. The device is ultimately characterized by its dated specifications and mediocre camera performance.
The Samsung Galaxy Tab 3 7.0 (Wi-Fi) is lauded for its compact, ergonomic design and improved, lightweight portability compared to its predecessor. Key advantages include a microSD slot for storage expansion, which mitigates the limited internal memory, and robust battery life exceeding 9 hours in video playback tests. Conversely, the device suffers from a low 1024 x 600 display resolution, resulting in a dated and pixelated viewing experience. Performance is another drawback, with the dual-core processor and 1GB of RAM lagging during intensive tasks, despite smooth basic navigation. The tablet serves as a functional, entry-level device for basic multimedia, enhanced by an integrated IR blaster and useful WatchOn app for home entertainment control. However, at its release price, the aging specifications make it feel overpriced compared to superior alternatives like the Nexus 7. Detailed analysis of the Samsung Galaxy Tab 3 7.0 is available on PhoneArena.
The Samsung Galaxy Tab 3 series offers a lightweight, ergonomic design and bright displays, making it suitable for casual media consumption and, in some models, comfortable one-handed use. Key advantages include the addition of a microSD slot for storage expansion and an IR blaster for controlling home devices. However, the devices are plagued by performance issues, including significant lag during multitasking and lackluster screen resolutions that appear outdated compared to competitors. While the series provides a functional, user-friendly experience for, in particular, basic tasks, the mid-range specifications and lack of a premium feel make it difficult to recommend over better-performing alternatives.
The Samsung Galaxy Tab 3 8.0 is a solid mid-range tablet, praised for its thin, light, and compact design with narrow bezels, which makes it ideal for one-handed use. Key advantages include the comfortable form factor and inclusion of useful features, such as an IR blaster and a microSD slot. While the display offers good colors and viewing angles, the 1280x800 resolution results in a relatively low pixel density where individual pixels are visible. A significant drawback is performance; the dual-core processor often struggles to drive the TouchWiz interface smoothly, resulting in lag. Ultimately, the tablet lacks a "wow factor" and, at its launch price, faced stiff competition from more powerful alternatives like the Nexus 7. The review deems it a capable middle-of-the-road device, though not the best value in its class.
The Samsung Galaxy Tab 3 10.1 is described as a thin, lightweight, and well-built tablet featuring a bright 10.1-inch display and useful extras like an IR blaster and expandable storage, though it ultimately feels like an underwhelming, incremental update. Performance is a major drawback, with the Intel Atom processor and 1GB of RAM causing frequent lag, stuttering, and multitasking issues, while the screen resolution remains stuck at a low 1280x800 pixels. Despite offering decent battery life, the device is criticized for lacking advanced features, having poor cameras, and carrying a price that is not justified by its performance compared to competitors.
Compare
