OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS
Scored using Tablets Methodology v3.0
Tablets Methodology v3.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontum Tablets Methodology v3.0: the technical score from the specifications is the base, and independent expert and video reviews (up to ±0.5 points), owner opinions (up to ±0.3) and best-of lists (up to +0.3) move it up or down.
Explore Tablets Methodology v3.0

Samsung Galaxy Tab 2 10.1 P5100 3G (1GB + 16GB) review: 168 specs compared

Avg. price:~£260RAM capacity:1 GBInternal storage:16 GBScreen size:10.1 inchesChipset:TI OMAP 4430

Samsung Galaxy Tab 2 10.1 P5100 3G (1GB + 16GB) Review: Compare 168 technical specifications and 20 expert and video reviews to see how this product ranks in the Tablets category and whether it is worth buying.

Samsung Galaxy Tab 2 10.1 P5100 3G (1GB + 16GB)
5.9/10

Overall score

Score
5.9/ 10
✕
What it is
Our main score for this model, 1–10. It combines specs, best-of lists, expert reviews and owners.
How we count it
Parts: Technical score 35%, List score 30%, Reviews score 25%, Sentiment score 10%
Marks: Each part gets a mark out of 10. For reviews, lists and owners, a typical model in this category gets about 8 and the best one gets 10.
No data yet: A part with no data shows "?". It counts as the mark of a weaker model in this category (4 in 5 models with data score higher). This way, models with reviews, lists and owners usually come out ahead.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 90% of models
Score components

35%

5.0

Technical score

30%

?

List scoreNot enough data yet, so we use 7.5, the mark of a weaker model in this category

25%

5.0

Reviews score

10%

?

Sentiment scoreNot enough data yet, so we use 6.9, the mark of a weaker model in this category

â–¼Worse than 90% of tablets
6.9

Value for money

Value for money
6.9/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the tablet's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a tablet with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 87% of models
Score components

70%

5.9

Overall score

30%

9.2

Price

â–¼Worse than 87%
5.0

Technical score

Technical score
5.0/ 10
✕
What it is
How good the specs are compared with the other models in this category, 1–10.
How we count it
Areas: We rate the specs in each area against the other models in this category.
Weighting: The areas that matter most to buyers count more. The shares are shown under Score components.
Share: The technical score is 35% of the overall score.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 89% of models
Score components

22%

4.0

Performance

20%

4.7

Display

16%

5.7

Camera

14%

4.6

Battery

12%

5.9

Connectivity

8%

6.0

Software

5%

4.8

Design

3%

4.8

Audio

â–¼Worse than 89%
5.0

Reviews score

Reviews score
5.0/ 10
✕
What it is
Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
How we count it
Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves. Big test sites count more, short reviews half as much as full tests. A video review counts half.
Score: The average grade is 80% of the review mark; the number of reviews is the other 20% (1 review = 5, the typical number in this category = 8, the most-reviewed model = 10).
Enough data: With few reviews, the average grade is pulled toward the typical grade of this category. No reviews yet: 7.4 for now.
Share: Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 91% of models

5.0

Mark 7.6 is below the typical mark 7.8 of this category, so it cannot lift the score above the technical score

80%

7.4

Average grade

20%

8.4

Popularity

Grades by review (20)
20 video reviews, each counting half as much as a written test. Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
User ratings collected online are not part of this score.
â–¼Worse than 91%
?

List score

List score
7.5/ 10
✕
What it is
How often independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers put this model in their best-of lists for this category.
How we count it
Points: The model in the most lists of this category gets 10; the others get 8 to 10 in proportion. In no list yet: 7.5. Lists count 30% of the overall score.
Enough data: Every list counts, even a single one. With fewer than 5 best-of lists in the category, this part is left out.
Lists with this model (0)
Not in any best-of list yet, so this part counts as 7.5. Models in a list get 8 to 10.
Not in any best-of list yet
  • samsung-galaxy-tab-2-10-1-p5100-16gb-1gb-16gb-3g
  • samsung-galaxy-tab-2-10-1-p5100-16gb-1gb-16gb-3g
samsung-galaxy-tab-2-10-1-p5100-16gb-1gb-16gb-3g
samsung-galaxy-tab-2-10-1-p5100-16gb-1gb-16gb-3g
Where to buy
    N/A~ £260
Best rankings
Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.

What reviewers say about the Samsung Galaxy Tab 2 10.1 P5100 3G (1GB + 16GB)

Based on 0 · 24

Reviewers like the speakers, display and battery, but gaming and the camera disappoint, while apps and speed divide opinion.
Praised
Mixed views
Criticised
Pick a topic to see who said what

What owners say about the Samsung Galaxy Tab 2 10.1 P5100 3G (1GB + 16GB)

Based on 100 owners sharing their experience in online comments

31%positive10%mixed59%negative

Owners value getting the old tablet working again, but many struggle with update stalls, missing sound, and sluggish performance.

What owners dislike

  • No sound after the upgrade10
  • After the upgrade, owners report the tablet runs very slowly, with apps lagging and most of its memory used even after removing unused apps.10
  • After setup, the tablet gets stuck on the 'Checking for updates' screen after Wi-Fi is connected, sometimes for hours, and never moves on.8
  • After flashing the recovery file with Odin, the tablet opens Android System Recovery instead of the TeamWin recovery shown in the video, so the steps cannot be finished.6
  • Firmware installation with Odin fails or stalls, showing errors such as 'Error 7', 'No MD5 file found', or a failed download, or the process stops with no progress.6
  • After the upgrade, owners find the Play Store stops working, won't download apps or updates, and some apps no longer run on the old Android version.6
  • After the upgrade, videos on the tablet stutter and play in jumpy, interrupted bursts, with owners asking how to fix the lag.3
  • The tablet is not recognised by the computer over USB, so the firmware or custom system cannot be installed, even after new drivers and a different cable.3
  • Tablet freezes or keeps restarting3

Points mentioned by at least 3 owners, most mentioned first.

Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of tablet Samsung Galaxy Tab 2 10.1 P5100 3G (1GB + 16GB)

Technical score
Technical score
5.0/ 10
✕
What it is
How good the specs are compared with the other models in this category, 1–10.
How we count it
Areas: We rate the specs in each area against the other models in this category.
Weighting: The areas that matter most to buyers count more. The shares are shown under Score components.
Share: The technical score is 35% of the overall score.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 89% of models
Score components:

22%

4.0

Performance

20%

4.7

Display

16%

5.7

Camera

14%

4.6

Battery

12%

5.9

Connectivity

8%

6.0

Software

5%

4.8

Design

3%

4.8

Audio

5.0
Reviews score
5.0
List score
?
Value for money
Value for money
6.9/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the tablet's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a tablet with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 87% of models
Score components:

70%

5.9

Overall score

30%

9.2

Price

6.9
RAM capacity
1 GB
Market range: <1 GB – >8 GB
This tablet has 1 GB of RAM, which is less than 78% of tablets and equal to 19.1% of tablets.
Process node
45 nm
Market range: <4 nm – >40 nm
This tablet is built on a 45 nm process, which is larger than 94.9% of tablets and equal to 4.4% of tablets.
Internal storage
16 GB
Market range: <16 GB – >256 GB
This tablet has 16 GB of internal storage, which is less than 78.8% of tablets and equal to 14.8% of tablets.
Geekbench 6 single-core score
?
Chipset
TI OMAP 4430
This tablet runs on TI OMAP 4430, which is less advanced than 68.4% of tablets and equal to 2.1% of tablets.
Show more
What reviewers say
Screen resolution
1280×800
This tablet has a 1280×800 screen, which is less sharp than 68.1% of tablets and equal to 21.7% of tablets.
Refresh rate
60 Hz
Market range: <60 Hz – >120 Hz
This tablet has a 60 Hz screen, which is smoother than 0.1% of tablets and equal to 73.4% of tablets.
Display type
IPS LCD
This tablet uses a IPS LCD display type. 17% of tablets use this display technology.
Pixel density
149 ppi
Market range: <149 ppi – >291 ppi
This tablet has a pixel density of 149 ppi, which is lower than 86.8% of tablets and equal to 9.2% of tablets.
Display glass type
Corning Gorilla Glass
This tablet protects its screen with Corning Gorilla Glass, which is more durable than 45.4% of tablets and the same as 32.8% of tablets.
Show more
What reviewers say
Optical image stabilization
no
This tablet does not support optical stabilisation. 0.4% of tablets offer this.
Main camera megapixels
?
Front camera megapixels
0.3 MP
Market range: <1.2 MP – >9 MP
This tablet has a front camera with 0.3 MP resolution, which is lower than 93% of tablets and equal to 7% of tablets.
Main camera aperture
f/2.6
This tablet has a main camera aperture of f/2.6, which is narrower than 87.6% of tablets and equal to 2% of tablets.
Optical zoom
N/A
Show more
What reviewers say
Battery capacity
7,000 mAh
Market range: <4k mAh – >10.1k mAh
This tablet has 7,000 mAh battery capacity, which is larger than 53.7% of tablets and equal to 3.6% of tablets.
Charging speed
10 W
Market range: <10 W – >45 W
This tablet charges at 10 W, which is slower than 60.9% of tablets and equal to 33.3% of tablets.
Battery life
10 hours
Market range: <7 hours – >16 hours
This tablet has a battery life of 10 hours, which is longer than that of 39.1% of tablets and equal to that of 20.5% of tablets.
Wireless charging
no
This tablet does not support wireless charging. 1.5% of tablets offer this.
Fast charging
no
This tablet does not support fast charging. 56.9% of tablets offer this.
Show more
What reviewers say
LTE support
no
This tablet does not have built-in LTE. 42.9% of tablets offer this.
Wi-Fi connectivity
yes
This tablet connects to Wi-Fi. 0.2% of tablets offer this.
GPS
yes
This tablet has built-in GPS. 17.1% of tablets offer this.
5G connectivity
no
This tablet does not support 5G. 8.1% of tablets offer this.
NFC
no
This tablet does not include NFC. 10.8% of tablets offer this.
Show more
What reviewers say
Operating system
Android
This tablet uses the Android operating system, which is more advanced than the one used by 23.2%.
Update support duration
short
This tablet offers short update support, which is shorter than the support period of 52.4% of tablets and equal to that of 47.6% of tablets.
Direct OS updates
yes
This tablet supports direct OS updates. 20.3% of tablets offer this.
On-device AI
no
This tablet does not support on-device AI. 28.3% of tablets support this capability.
App tracking protection
no
This tablet does not support app tracking protection. 28.4% of tablets offer this.
Show more
IP rating
not rated
This tablet's IP rating is not rated, which is less protected than 16.5% of tablets and the same as 83.6% of tablets.
Weight
588 g
Market range: <315 g – >730 g
This tablet weighs 588 g, which is heavier than 73.4% of tablets and equal to 0.1% of tablets.
Backlit keyboard
no
This tablet does not support a backlit keyboard. 9.7% of tablets support backlit keyboards.
Keyboard accessory
no
This tablet does not support a keyboard accessory. 84.3% of tablets support this option.
Pen latency
N/A
Show more
What reviewers say
Number of microphones
1
Market range: <1 – >3
This tablet has a microphone array of 1, which is more than 0.2% of tablets and equal to 54.8% of tablets.
aptX Adaptive
no
This tablet does not support aptX Adaptive. 6.9% of tablets offer this.
Dolby Atmos support
no
This tablet does not support Dolby Atmos. 31.3% of tablets support Dolby Atmos.
N. of speakers
2
Market range: <2 – >4
This tablet includes 2 speakers, which is more than in 9.8% of tablets and equal to the number in 60.8% of tablets.
FM radio
yes
This tablet includes an FM radio. 81.1% of tablets offer this.
Show more
What reviewers say

Samsung Galaxy Tab 2 10.1 P5100 3G (1GB + 16GB) vs the average tablet

246810TotalPerformanceDisplayCameraBatteryConnectivitySoftwareDesignAudio
  • Manual focus control
    This tablet supports manual focus, while the average tablet does not. 36.9% of tablets support manual focus.
  • Supports cellular data
    This tablet supports cellular data, while the average tablet does not. 47.4% of tablets offer this.
  • More advanced chipset
    This tablet has a more advanced chipset than the average tablet (TI OMAP 4430 vs MediaTek MT8169A).
    TI OMAP 4,430 vs MediaTek MT8169A
  • Supports HDMI output
    This tablet supports HDMI output, while the average tablet does not. 49.8% of tablets offer this.
  • More advanced chipset
    This tablet has a more advanced chipset than the average tablet (TI OMAP 4430 vs MediaTek MT8169A).
    TI OMAP 4,430 vs MediaTek MT8169A
  • Manual focus control
    This tablet supports manual focus, while the average tablet does not. 36.9% of tablets support manual focus.
  • Supports cellular data
    This tablet supports cellular data, while the average tablet does not. 47.4% of tablets offer this.
  • Supports HDMI output
    This tablet supports HDMI output, while the average tablet does not. 49.8% of tablets offer this.
  • 4.7 MP lower front resolution
    This tablet has a lower-resolution front camera than the average tablet (0.3 MP vs 5 MP). The average tablet has a front camera of 5 MP.
    0.3 MP vs 5 MP
  • 6 fewer CPU threads
    This tablet has fewer CPU threads than the average tablet (2 vs 8). The average tablet has 8 CPU threads.
    2 vs 8
  • 28.6% lower review score
    Reviews score
    5.0/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
    How we count it
    Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves. Big test sites count more, short reviews half as much as full tests. A video review counts half.
    Score: The average grade is 80% of the review mark; the number of reviews is the other 20% (1 review = 5, the typical number in this category = 8, the most-reviewed model = 10).
    Enough data: With few reviews, the average grade is pulled toward the typical grade of this category. No reviews yet: 7.4 for now.
    Share: Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
    Score distribution
    â–¼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    â–¼ Worse than 91% of models

    5.0

    Mark 7.6 is below the typical mark 7.8 of this category, so it cannot lift the score above the technical score

    80%

    7.4

    Average grade

    20%

    8.4

    Popularity

    Grades by review (20)
    20 video reviews, each counting half as much as a written test. Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
    User ratings collected online are not part of this score.
    5.0 vs 7.0
  • No USB-C port
    This tablet does not have a USB Type-C port, while the average tablet does. 54% of tablets have one.
  • 3 GB less RAM
    This tablet has less RAM than the average tablet (1 GB vs 4 GB). The average tablet has 4 GB of RAM.
    1 GB vs 4 GB
  • 50% lower CPU speed
    This tablet has a lower CPU speed than the average tablet (1 GHz vs 2 GHz). The average tablet has CPU speed of 2 GHz.
    1 GHz vs 2 GHz
  • Shorter update support
    This tablet offers shorter update support than the average tablet (short vs medium). The average tablet gets medium of update support.
    short vs medium
  • No fast charging
    This tablet does not support fast charging, while the average tablet does. 56.8% of tablets support fast charging.
  • 28.6% lower review score
    Reviews score
    5.0/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
    How we count it
    Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves. Big test sites count more, short reviews half as much as full tests. A video review counts half.
    Score: The average grade is 80% of the review mark; the number of reviews is the other 20% (1 review = 5, the typical number in this category = 8, the most-reviewed model = 10).
    Enough data: With few reviews, the average grade is pulled toward the typical grade of this category. No reviews yet: 7.4 for now.
    Share: Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
    Score distribution
    â–¼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    â–¼ Worse than 91% of models

    5.0

    Mark 7.6 is below the typical mark 7.8 of this category, so it cannot lift the score above the technical score

    80%

    7.4

    Average grade

    20%

    8.4

    Popularity

    Grades by review (20)
    20 video reviews, each counting half as much as a written test. Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
    User ratings collected online are not part of this score.
    5.0 vs 7.0
  • 9.7% worse value for money
    Samsung Galaxy Tab 2 10.1 P5100 3G (1GB + 16GB) has worse value for money than the average tablet (6.88 vs 7.6).
    6.88 vs 7.55
  • 6 fewer CPU threads
    This tablet has fewer CPU threads than the average tablet (2 vs 8). The average tablet has 8 CPU threads.
    2 vs 8
  • 3 GB less RAM
    This tablet has less RAM than the average tablet (1 GB vs 4 GB). The average tablet has 4 GB of RAM.
    1 GB vs 4 GB
  • 50% lower CPU speed
    This tablet has a lower CPU speed than the average tablet (1 GHz vs 2 GHz). The average tablet has CPU speed of 2 GHz.
    1 GHz vs 2 GHz
  • 3.21x larger process node
    This tablet has a larger process node than the average tablet (45 nm vs 14 nm). The average tablet is built on 14 nm.
    45 nm vs 14 nm
  • More basic graphics
    This tablet has less advanced graphics than the average tablet (PowerVR SGX540 vs Mali-G51).
    PowerVR SGX540 vs Mali-G51
  • 75% less internal storage
    This tablet has less internal storage than the average tablet (16 GB vs 64 GB). The average tablet has 64 GB of internal storage.
    16 GB vs 64 GB
  • No big.LITTLE architecture
    This tablet does not support big.LITTLE architecture, while the average tablet does. 51.7% of tablets support big.LITTLE architecture.
  • 53.2% slower GPU clock
    This tablet runs its GPU slower than the average tablet (304 MHz vs 650 MHz). The average tablet runs its GPU at 650 MHz.
    304 MHz vs 650 MHz
  • 57% less memory bandwidth
    This tablet has less memory bandwidth than the average tablet (6.4 GB/s vs 14.9 GB/s). The average tablet has 14.9 GB/s of memory bandwidth.
    6.4 GB/s vs 14.9 GB/s
  • 7 years older
    This tablet was released earlier than the average tablet (2012 vs 2019). The average tablet was released in 2019.
    May 2012
    2012 vs 2019
  • More basic memory type
    This tablet uses less advanced memory than the average tablet (LPDDR2 vs LPDDR3).
    LPDDR2 vs LPDDR3
  • 2 fewer GPU execution units
    This tablet has less GPU execution units than the average tablet (2 vs 4). The average tablet has 4 GPU execution units.
    2 vs 4
  • 32.6% softer screen detail
    This tablet has softer screen detail than the average tablet (149 ppi vs 221 ppi). The average tablet has a pixel density of 221 ppi.
    149 ppi vs 221 ppi
  • Less sharp display
    This tablet has a less sharp screen than the average tablet (1280×800 vs 1920×1200).
    1,280×800 vs 1,920×1,200
  • Less vivid contrast
    This tablet has less contrast than the average tablet (882:1 vs 1015:1). The average tablet has a contrast ratio of 1015:1.
    882:1 vs 1,015:1
  • 50% slower touch response
    This tablet samples touch more slowly than the average tablet (60 Hz vs 120 Hz). The average tablet samples touch at 120 Hz.
    60 Hz vs 120 Hz
  • 1 nits dimmer screen
    This tablet is dimmer than the average tablet (400 nits vs 401 nits). The average tablet reaches 401 nits.
    400 nits vs 401 nits
  • 12 nits lower typical brightness
    This tablet has a lower typical brightness than the average tablet (388 nits vs 400 nits). The average tablet reaches 400 nits typical brightness.
    388 nits vs 400 nits
  • 4.7 MP lower front resolution
    This tablet has a lower-resolution front camera than the average tablet (0.3 MP vs 5 MP). The average tablet has a front camera of 5 MP.
    0.3 MP vs 5 MP
  • No continuous video AF
    This tablet does not support continuous video AF, the average tablet does. 57.7% of tablets support continuous video autofocus.
  • Worse main-camera video
    This tablet supports worse main-camera video recording than the average tablet (720x30 fps vs 1080x30 fps). The average tablet supports 1080x30 fps main-camera video recording.
    720x30 fps vs 1080x30 fps
  • No tap-to-focus
    This tablet does not support touch autofocus, while the average tablet does. 83% of tablets support touch autofocus.
  • No burst mode
    This tablet does not support burst mode, the average tablet does. 60.6% of tablets support burst mode.
  • Narrower main camera aperture
    This tablet has a narrower main camera aperture than the average tablet (f/2.6 vs f/2.2). The average tablet's main camera aperture is f/2.2.
    f/2.6 vs f/2.2
  • No backside-illuminated sensor
    This tablet does not have a BSI sensor, while the average tablet does. 52.6% of tablets have a BSI sensor.
  • No timelapse video
    This tablet does not support timelapse video, while the average tablet does. 57.5% of tablets support timelapse video.
  • No fast charging
    This tablet does not support fast charging, while the average tablet does. 56.8% of tablets support fast charging.
  • 44.4% slower charging
    This tablet charges slower than the average tablet (10 W vs 18 W). The average tablet charges at 18 W.
    10 W vs 18 W
  • No USB-C port
    This tablet does not have a USB Type-C port, while the average tablet does. 54% of tablets have one.
  • Older Bluetooth version
    This tablet has an older Bluetooth version than the average tablet (3 vs 5).
    3 vs 5
  • Older Wi-Fi standard
    This tablet has an older Wi-Fi standard than the average tablet (Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n) vs Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac)).
    Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n) vs Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac)
  • No Ethernet support
    This tablet does not have Ethernet support, the average tablet does. 76.5% of tablets support Ethernet.
  • Shorter update support
    This tablet offers shorter update support than the average tablet (short vs medium). The average tablet gets medium of update support.
    short vs medium
  • No split-screen
    This tablet does not support split-screen, the average tablet does. 72.8% of tablets support split-screen.
  • No picture-in-picture mode
    This tablet does not support picture-in-picture, the average tablet does. 61.4% of tablets support picture-in-picture.
  • No camera and mic privacy
    This tablet does not support camera and mic privacy, while the average tablet does. 56.6% of tablets offer this.
  • No multi-user mode
    User score
    8.0/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    Average of independent expert reviews and videos, graded by us; missing reviews count as 7/10.
    When it matters
    When you want to know how independent test sites and video reviewers rate the product in real use.
    Score distribution
    â–¼
    â–¼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    Samsung Galaxy Tab 2 10.1 P5100 3G
    the average tablet
    Samsung Galaxy Tab 2 10.1 P5100 3G (1GB + 16GB) does not support multi-user mode, while the average tablet does. 73.8% of tablets offer this.
  • No full-page screenshots
    This tablet does not support full-page screenshots, the average tablet does. 53% of tablets support full-page screenshots.
  • No location privacy
    This tablet does not support location privacy, while the average tablet does. 76.7% of tablets offer this.
  • No dark mode
    This tablet does not support dark mode, while the average tablet does. 57.7% of tablets offer this.
  • 20% heavier
    This tablet is heavier than the average tablet (588 g vs 490 g). The average tablet weighs 490 g.
    588 g vs 490 g
  • No keyboard accessory
    This tablet does not support a keyboard accessory, the average tablet does. 84.2% of tablets support a keyboard accessory.
  • 1.7 mm thicker
    This tablet is thicker than the average tablet (9.7 mm vs 8 mm). The average tablet is 8 mm thick.
    9.7 mm vs 8 mm

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

3.0
ictio
≈ estimated
13/04/2026
Hands-on test · apps, camera and performance
Verdict
Samsung Galaxy Tab 2 10.1 P5100 3G is not worth using, since nothing runs well enough.
9.0
Ian Dixon
≈ estimated
03/03/2013
Hands-on review · performance, UI and hardware
Verdict
Samsung Galaxy Tab 2 10.1 P5100 3G is a good 10-inch Android tablet for the price, held back mainly by its proprietary charging connector.
9.0
H2TechVideos
≈ estimated
14/06/2012
Pros and cons review · standby battery and everyday use
Verdict
Samsung Galaxy Tab 2 10.1 P5100 3G is recommended for browsing, email, video and music, though it is weak for gaming.
7.0
The YouTube Tech Guy
≈ estimated
04/06/2012
Gaming test · four games played on the tablet
Verdict
Samsung Galaxy Tab 2 10.1 P5100 3G is not built for gaming, but it is good for everything else, with a strong battery and front speakers.
8.0
Android Authority
≈ estimated
31/05/2012
Long-term review · one week of daily use
Verdict
Samsung Galaxy Tab 2 10.1 P5100 3G is overall a nice tablet with great battery life, held back by the music player and TouchWiz.
9.0
The YouTube Tech Guy
≈ estimated
24/05/2012
Full review · design, apps, browser, camera and performance
Verdict
Samsung Galaxy Tab 2 10.1 P5100 3G is great overall and an amazing deal, though the camera is weak and not every game runs on it.
6.0
MobileTechReview
≈ estimated
17/05/2012
Full review · gaming, battery, camera and remote app tests
Verdict
Samsung Galaxy Tab 2 10.1 P5100 3G is a nice-looking budget Samsung tablet, but rivals offer more speed and features at this price.
5.0
PhoneArena
≈ estimated
15/05/2012
Full review · benchmarks, camera and battery tests
Verdict
Samsung Galaxy Tab 2 10.1 P5100 3G is unimpressive compared with the original, and the smaller model is the better buy.
8.0
Drew Russo
≈ estimated
22/12/2012
Quick review · speed and first setup impressions
Verdict
Samsung Galaxy Tab 2 10.1 P5100 3G is a good tablet, judged better than the creator's previous one.
9.0
TechTubeCentral
≈ estimated
28/08/2012
Hands-on review · menus, keyboard and widgets
Verdict
Samsung Galaxy Tab 2 10.1 P5100 3G is a tablet the creator loved, though it is Wi-Fi only and not an iPad rival.
8.0
Android Authority
≈ estimated
25/05/2012
Unboxing and quick review · UI and camera demo
Verdict
Samsung Galaxy Tab 2 10.1 P5100 3G makes a good first impression, with smooth performance, a sharp display and a pleasant interface.
5.0
ApFaqTech
≈ estimated
23/05/2012
First look · scrolling, video and game performance
Verdict
Samsung Galaxy Tab 2 10.1 P5100 3G feels like an overpriced sequel, with weaker performance than rival tablets.
More graded video reviews (2)
creator’s own scoreestimated by us

Third-party reviews

What customers like about Samsung Galaxy Tab 2 10.1 P5100 3G (1GB + 16GB)

  • Dual front-facing speakers provide loud, clear, and immersive audio.
  • Responsive 10.1-inch PLS TFT touchscreen with good visibility for media.
  • Features a microSD slot for easy storage expansion up to 32GB.
  • Sturdy and well-built plastic chassis that feels comfortable in the hand.
  • Impressive battery life, lasting nearly 10 hours in some continuous surfing tests.
  • Support for 3G connectivity and GSM voice communication (phone calls/SMS).

What customers don't like about Samsung Galaxy Tab 2 10.1 P5100 3G (1GB + 16GB)

  • Dual-core 1.0 GHz processor struggles with large 1080p video files, causing stuttering or 'slideshow' playback.
  • Poor camera quality; the 3MP rear camera lacks detail and the front camera was downgraded to VGA from the previous model.
  • Noticeable lag or 'clipping' during web browsing and when running multiple heavy applications.
  • Slow charging times, especially when the screen is turned on.
  • Outdated software (Android 4.0/4.1) with limited support for modern apps and security updates.
  • No built-in HDMI port, requiring an optional adapter for external display connection.
  • Screen color accuracy is lower than that of the original Galaxy Tab 10.1.

Verdict

The Samsung Galaxy Tab 2 10.1 P5100 is a versatile 10.1-inch tablet featuring 3G HSPA+ connectivity for mobile data and voice calls, alongside a 1280 x 800 PLS LCD protected by Corning Gorilla Glass. It is powered by a 1GHz TI OMAP 4430 dual-core processor with 1GB of RAM and 16GB of internal storage, which is expandable via a dedicated microSD slot. Main pros include its slim design with front-facing stereo speakers, reliable GPS/GLONASS navigation, and a large 7,000 mAh battery that provides solid runtimes for media consumption. However, its primary cons are the aging hardware that struggles with high-definition 1080p video, a mediocre 3MP rear camera that lacks a flash, and a relatively slow charging process.

Compare Samsung Galaxy Tab 2 10.1 P5100 3G (1GB + 16GB) with other tablets

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Samsung Galaxy Tab 2 10.1 P5100 3G (1GB + 16GB) and other tablets

No results found