OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS
Scored using Tablets Methodology v3.0
Tablets Methodology v3.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontum Tablets Methodology v3.0: the technical score from the specifications is the base, and independent expert and video reviews (up to ±0.5 points), owner opinions (up to ±0.3) and best-of lists (up to +0.3) move it up or down.
Explore Tablets Methodology v3.0

Samsung Galaxy Note 10.1 N8010 (2GB + 16GB) review: 168 specs compared

Avg. price:~£530RAM capacity:2 GBInternal storage:16 GBScreen size:10.1 inchesChipset:Exynos 4412

Samsung Galaxy Note 10.1 N8010 (2GB + 16GB) Review: Compare 168 technical specifications and 20 expert and video reviews to see how this product ranks in the Tablets category and whether it is worth buying.

Samsung Galaxy Note 10.1 N8010 (2GB + 16GB)
6.8/10

Overall score

Score
6.8/ 10
✕
What it is
Our main score for this model, 1–10. It combines specs, best-of lists, expert reviews and owners.
How we count it
Parts: Technical score 35%, List score 30%, Reviews score 25%, Sentiment score 10%
Marks: Each part gets a mark out of 10. For reviews, lists and owners, a typical model in this category gets about 8 and the best one gets 10.
No data yet: A part with no data shows "?". It counts as the mark of a weaker model in this category (4 in 5 models with data score higher). This way, models with reviews, lists and owners usually come out ahead.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 58% of models
Score components

35%

5.3

Technical score

30%

?

List scoreNot enough data yet, so we use 7.5, the mark of a weaker model in this category

25%

8.1

Reviews score

10%

?

Sentiment scoreNot enough data yet, so we use 6.9, the mark of a weaker model in this category

â–¼Worse than 58% of tablets
7.1

Value for money

Value for money
7.1/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the tablet's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a tablet with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 78% of models
Score components

70%

6.8

Overall score

30%

7.7

Price

â–¼Worse than 78%
5.3

Technical score

Technical score
5.3/ 10
✕
What it is
How good the specs are compared with the other models in this category, 1–10.
How we count it
Areas: We rate the specs in each area against the other models in this category.
Weighting: The areas that matter most to buyers count more. The shares are shown under Score components.
Share: The technical score is 35% of the overall score.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 78% of models
Score components

22%

4.5

Performance

20%

5.1

Display

16%

5.8

Camera

14%

4.2

Battery

12%

5.8

Connectivity

8%

7.1

Software

5%

6.9

Design

3%

4.8

Audio

â–¼Worse than 78%
8.1

Reviews score

Reviews score
8.1/ 10
✕
What it is
Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
How we count it
Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves. Big test sites count more, short reviews half as much as full tests. A video review counts half.
Score: The average grade is 80% of the review mark; the number of reviews is the other 20% (1 review = 5, the typical number in this category = 8, the most-reviewed model = 10).
Enough data: With few reviews, the average grade is pulled toward the typical grade of this category. No reviews yet: 7.4 for now.
Share: Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 68% of models

80%

8.0

Average grade

20%

8.4

Popularity

Grades by review (20)
20 video reviews, each counting half as much as a written test. Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
User ratings collected online are not part of this score.
â–²Better than 68%
?

List score

List score
7.5/ 10
✕
What it is
How often independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers put this model in their best-of lists for this category.
How we count it
Points: The model in the most lists of this category gets 10; the others get 8 to 10 in proportion. In no list yet: 7.5. Lists count 30% of the overall score.
Enough data: Every list counts, even a single one. With fewer than 5 best-of lists in the category, this part is left out.
Lists with this model (0)
Not in any best-of list yet, so this part counts as 7.5. Models in a list get 8 to 10.
Not in any best-of list yet
  • samsung-galaxy-note-10-1-n8010-16gb-2gb-16gb
samsung-galaxy-note-10-1-n8010-16gb-2gb-16gb
Where to buy
    N/A~ £530
Best rankings
Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Other versions:
2GB + 16GB2GB + 32GB2GB + 64GB

What reviewers say about the Samsung Galaxy Note 10.1 N8010 (2GB + 16GB)

Based on 0 · 23

Reviewers praise the S Pen and good speakers, but the low screen resolution is the main complaint; multitasking divides opinion.
Praised
Mixed views
Criticised
Pick a topic to see who said what
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of tablet Samsung Galaxy Note 10.1 N8010 (2GB + 16GB)

Technical score
Technical score
5.3/ 10
✕
What it is
How good the specs are compared with the other models in this category, 1–10.
How we count it
Areas: We rate the specs in each area against the other models in this category.
Weighting: The areas that matter most to buyers count more. The shares are shown under Score components.
Share: The technical score is 35% of the overall score.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 78% of models
Score components:

22%

4.5

Performance

20%

5.1

Display

16%

5.8

Camera

14%

4.2

Battery

12%

5.8

Connectivity

8%

7.1

Software

5%

6.9

Design

3%

4.8

Audio

5.3
Reviews score
8.1
List score
?
Value for money
Value for money
7.1/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the tablet's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a tablet with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 78% of models
Score components:

70%

6.8

Overall score

30%

7.7

Price

7.1
RAM capacity
2 GB
Market range: <1 GB – >8 GB
This tablet has 2 GB of RAM, which is less than 61.3% of tablets and equal to 15.5% of tablets.
Process node
32 nm
Market range: <4 nm – >40 nm
This tablet is built on a 32 nm process, which is larger than 82.7% of tablets and equal to 4.2% of tablets.
Internal storage
16 GB
Market range: <16 GB – >256 GB
This tablet has 16 GB of internal storage, which is less than 78.8% of tablets and equal to 14.8% of tablets.
Geekbench 6 single-core score
?
Chipset
Exynos 4412
This tablet runs on Exynos 4412, which is more advanced than 75.9% of tablets and equal to 0.5% of tablets.
Show more
What reviewers say
Screen resolution
1280×800
This tablet has a 1280×800 screen, which is less sharp than 68.1% of tablets and equal to 21.7% of tablets.
Refresh rate
60 Hz
Market range: <60 Hz – >120 Hz
This tablet has a 60 Hz screen, which is smoother than 0.1% of tablets and equal to 73.4% of tablets.
Display type
IPS LCD
This tablet uses a IPS LCD display type. 17% of tablets use this display technology.
Pixel density
149 ppi
Market range: <149 ppi – >291 ppi
This tablet has a pixel density of 149 ppi, which is lower than 86.8% of tablets and equal to 9.2% of tablets.
Display glass type
Corning Gorilla Glass
This tablet protects its screen with Corning Gorilla Glass, which is more durable than 45.4% of tablets and the same as 32.8% of tablets.
Show more
What reviewers say
Optical image stabilization
no
This tablet does not support optical stabilisation. 0.4% of tablets offer this.
Main camera megapixels
5 MP
Market range: <3.15 MP – >13 MP
This tablet has a rear camera with 5 MP resolution, which is lower than 63.7% of tablets and equal to 26% of tablets.
Front camera megapixels
1.9 MP
Market range: <1.2 MP – >9 MP
This tablet has a front camera with 1.9 MP resolution, which is lower than 79.2% of tablets and equal to 0.7% of tablets.
Main camera aperture
f/2.4
This tablet has a main camera aperture of f/2.4, which is narrower than 70% of tablets and equal to 17.5% of tablets.
Optical zoom
1xxx
This tablet has 1xx optical zoom, which is stronger than 18.2% of tablets and equal to 80.9% of tablets.
Show more
What reviewers say
Battery capacity
7,000 mAh
Market range: <4k mAh – >10.1k mAh
This tablet has 7,000 mAh battery capacity, which is larger than 53.7% of tablets and equal to 3.6% of tablets.
Charging speed
10.6 W
Market range: <10 W – >45 W
This tablet charges at 10.6 W, which is slower than 60.4% of tablets and equal to 0.4% of tablets.
Battery life
8 hours
Market range: <7 hours – >16 hours
This tablet has a battery life of 8 hours, which is shorter than that of 72.2% of tablets and equal to that of 11.9% of tablets.
Wireless charging
no
This tablet does not support wireless charging. 1.5% of tablets offer this.
Fast charging
no
This tablet does not support fast charging. 56.9% of tablets offer this.
Show more
LTE support
no
This tablet does not have built-in LTE. 42.9% of tablets offer this.
Wi-Fi connectivity
yes
This tablet connects to Wi-Fi. 0.2% of tablets offer this.
GPS
yes
This tablet has built-in GPS. 17.1% of tablets offer this.
5G connectivity
no
This tablet does not support 5G. 8.1% of tablets offer this.
NFC
no
This tablet does not include NFC. 10.8% of tablets offer this.
Show more
Operating system
Android
This tablet uses the Android operating system, which is more advanced than the one used by 23.2%.
Update support duration
short
This tablet offers short update support, which is shorter than the support period of 52.4% of tablets and equal to that of 47.6% of tablets.
Direct OS updates
yes
This tablet supports direct OS updates. 20.3% of tablets offer this.
On-device AI
no
This tablet does not support on-device AI. 28.3% of tablets support this capability.
App tracking protection
no
This tablet does not support app tracking protection. 28.4% of tablets offer this.
Show more
What reviewers say
IP rating
not rated
This tablet's IP rating is not rated, which is less protected than 16.5% of tablets and the same as 83.6% of tablets.
Weight
597 g
Market range: <315 g – >730 g
This tablet weighs 597 g, which is heavier than 75.2% of tablets and equal to 0.3% of tablets.
Backlit keyboard
no
This tablet does not support a backlit keyboard. 9.7% of tablets support backlit keyboards.
Keyboard accessory
yes
This tablet supports a keyboard accessory. 15.8% of tablets support this option.
Pen latency
?
Show more
What reviewers say
Number of microphones
1
Market range: <1 – >3
This tablet has a microphone array of 1, which is more than 0.2% of tablets and equal to 54.8% of tablets.
aptX Adaptive
no
This tablet does not support aptX Adaptive. 6.9% of tablets offer this.
Dolby Atmos support
no
This tablet does not support Dolby Atmos. 31.3% of tablets support Dolby Atmos.
N. of speakers
2
Market range: <2 – >4
This tablet includes 2 speakers, which is more than in 9.8% of tablets and equal to the number in 60.8% of tablets.
FM radio
no
This tablet does not include an FM radio. 19% of tablets offer this.
Show more
What reviewers say

Samsung Galaxy Note 10.1 N8010 (2GB + 16GB) vs the average tablet

246810TotalPerformanceDisplayCameraBatteryConnectivitySoftwareDesignAudio
  • More advanced chipset
    This tablet has a more advanced chipset than the average tablet (Exynos 4412 vs MediaTek MT8169A).
    Exynos 4,412 vs MediaTek MT8169A
  • Manual focus control
    This tablet supports manual focus, while the average tablet does not. 36.9% of tablets support manual focus.
  • Stylus included
    This tablet includes a stylus, while the average tablet does not. 17.2% of tablets offer this.
  • Supports drawing
    This tablet is suitable for drawing, while the average tablet is not. 40% of tablets are suitable for drawing.
  • 15.7% higher review score
    Reviews score
    8.1/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
    How we count it
    Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves. Big test sites count more, short reviews half as much as full tests. A video review counts half.
    Score: The average grade is 80% of the review mark; the number of reviews is the other 20% (1 review = 5, the typical number in this category = 8, the most-reviewed model = 10).
    Enough data: With few reviews, the average grade is pulled toward the typical grade of this category. No reviews yet: 7.4 for now.
    Share: Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
    Score distribution
    â–¼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    â–² Better than 68% of models

    80%

    8.0

    Average grade

    20%

    8.4

    Popularity

    Grades by review (20)
    20 video reviews, each counting half as much as a written test. Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
    User ratings collected online are not part of this score.
    8.1 vs 7.0
  • Supports stylus tilt
    This tablet supports stylus tilt, the average tablet does not. 33.5% of tablets support stylus tilt.
  • Built-in camera flash
    This tablet has a camera flash, while the average tablet does not. 45.5% of tablets have one.
  • Supports HDMI output
    This tablet supports HDMI output, while the average tablet does not. 49.8% of tablets offer this.
  • 15.7% higher review score
    Reviews score
    8.1/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
    How we count it
    Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves. Big test sites count more, short reviews half as much as full tests. A video review counts half.
    Score: The average grade is 80% of the review mark; the number of reviews is the other 20% (1 review = 5, the typical number in this category = 8, the most-reviewed model = 10).
    Enough data: With few reviews, the average grade is pulled toward the typical grade of this category. No reviews yet: 7.4 for now.
    Share: Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
    Score distribution
    â–¼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    â–² Better than 68% of models

    80%

    8.0

    Average grade

    20%

    8.4

    Popularity

    Grades by review (20)
    20 video reviews, each counting half as much as a written test. Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
    User ratings collected online are not part of this score.
    8.1 vs 7.0
  • More advanced chipset
    This tablet has a more advanced chipset than the average tablet (Exynos 4412 vs MediaTek MT8169A).
    Exynos 4,412 vs MediaTek MT8169A
  • Manual focus control
    This tablet supports manual focus, while the average tablet does not. 36.9% of tablets support manual focus.
  • Built-in camera flash
    This tablet has a camera flash, while the average tablet does not. 45.5% of tablets have one.
  • Supports HDMI output
    This tablet supports HDMI output, while the average tablet does not. 49.8% of tablets offer this.
  • Stylus included
    This tablet includes a stylus, while the average tablet does not. 17.2% of tablets offer this.
  • Supports drawing
    This tablet is suitable for drawing, while the average tablet is not. 40% of tablets are suitable for drawing.
  • Supports stylus tilt
    This tablet supports stylus tilt, the average tablet does not. 33.5% of tablets support stylus tilt.
  • No USB-C port
    This tablet does not have a USB Type-C port, while the average tablet does. 54% of tablets have one.
  • 3.1 MP lower front resolution
    This tablet has a lower-resolution front camera than the average tablet (1.9 MP vs 5 MP). The average tablet has a front camera of 5 MP.
    1.9 MP vs 5 MP
  • 4 fewer CPU threads
    This tablet has fewer CPU threads than the average tablet (4 vs 8). The average tablet has 8 CPU threads.
    4 vs 8
  • More basic graphics
    This tablet has less advanced graphics than the average tablet (Mali-400 MP4 vs Mali-G51).
    Mali-400 MP4 vs Mali-G51
  • Shorter update support
    This tablet offers shorter update support than the average tablet (short vs medium). The average tablet gets medium of update support.
    short vs medium
  • No fast charging
    This tablet does not support fast charging, while the average tablet does. 56.8% of tablets support fast charging.
  • 32.6% softer screen detail
    This tablet has softer screen detail than the average tablet (149 ppi vs 221 ppi). The average tablet has a pixel density of 221 ppi.
    149 ppi vs 221 ppi
  • No continuous video AF
    This tablet does not support continuous video AF, the average tablet does. 57.7% of tablets support continuous video autofocus.
  • 2.04x more expensive
    Samsung Galaxy Note 10.1 N8010 (2GB + 16GB) is more expensive than the average tablet (£530 vs £260).
    £530 vs £260
  • 6.7% worse value for money
    Samsung Galaxy Note 10.1 N8010 (2GB + 16GB) has worse value for money than the average tablet (7.08 vs 7.6).
    7.08 vs 7.55
  • 4 fewer CPU threads
    This tablet has fewer CPU threads than the average tablet (4 vs 8). The average tablet has 8 CPU threads.
    4 vs 8
  • More basic graphics
    This tablet has less advanced graphics than the average tablet (Mali-400 MP4 vs Mali-G51).
    Mali-400 MP4 vs Mali-G51
  • 30% lower CPU speed
    This tablet has a lower CPU speed than the average tablet (1.4 GHz vs 2 GHz). The average tablet has CPU speed of 2 GHz.
    1.4 GHz vs 2 GHz
  • 2 GB less RAM
    This tablet has less RAM than the average tablet (2 GB vs 4 GB). The average tablet has 4 GB of RAM.
    2 GB vs 4 GB
  • 2.29x larger process node
    This tablet has a larger process node than the average tablet (32 nm vs 14 nm). The average tablet is built on 14 nm.
    32 nm vs 14 nm
  • 75% less internal storage
    This tablet has less internal storage than the average tablet (16 GB vs 64 GB). The average tablet has 64 GB of internal storage.
    16 GB vs 64 GB
  • 1,066 MHz slower RAM speed
    This tablet has a lower RAM speed than the average tablet (800 MHz vs 1,866 MHz). The average tablet has RAM speed of 1,866 MHz.
    800 MHz vs 1,866 MHz
  • No big.LITTLE architecture
    This tablet does not support big.LITTLE architecture, while the average tablet does. 51.7% of tablets support big.LITTLE architecture.
  • 57% less memory bandwidth
    This tablet has less memory bandwidth than the average tablet (6.4 GB/s vs 14.9 GB/s). The average tablet has 14.9 GB/s of memory bandwidth.
    6.4 GB/s vs 14.9 GB/s
  • 32.3% slower GPU clock
    This tablet runs its GPU slower than the average tablet (440 MHz vs 650 MHz). The average tablet runs its GPU at 650 MHz.
    440 MHz vs 650 MHz
  • 7 years older
    This tablet was released earlier than the average tablet (2012 vs 2019). The average tablet was released in 2019.
    August 2012
    2012 vs 2019
  • More basic memory type
    This tablet uses less advanced memory than the average tablet (LPDDR2 vs LPDDR3).
    LPDDR2 vs LPDDR3
  • 32.6% softer screen detail
    This tablet has softer screen detail than the average tablet (149 ppi vs 221 ppi). The average tablet has a pixel density of 221 ppi.
    149 ppi vs 221 ppi
  • Less sharp display
    This tablet has a less sharp screen than the average tablet (1280×800 vs 1920×1200).
    1,280×800 vs 1,920×1,200
  • Less vivid contrast
    This tablet has less contrast than the average tablet (804:1 vs 1015:1). The average tablet has a contrast ratio of 1015:1.
    804:1 vs 1,015:1
  • 30 nits lower typical brightness
    This tablet has a lower typical brightness than the average tablet (370 nits vs 400 nits). The average tablet reaches 400 nits typical brightness.
    370 nits vs 400 nits
  • 3.1 MP lower front resolution
    This tablet has a lower-resolution front camera than the average tablet (1.9 MP vs 5 MP). The average tablet has a front camera of 5 MP.
    1.9 MP vs 5 MP
  • No continuous video AF
    This tablet does not support continuous video AF, the average tablet does. 57.7% of tablets support continuous video autofocus.
  • Worse main-camera video
    This tablet supports worse main-camera video recording than the average tablet (720x30 fps vs 1080x30 fps). The average tablet supports 1080x30 fps main-camera video recording.
    720x30 fps vs 1080x30 fps
  • 3 MP lower rear resolution
    This tablet has a lower-resolution rear camera than the average tablet (5 MP vs 8 MP). The average tablet has a rear camera of 8 MP.
    5 MP vs 8 MP
  • No manual exposure control
    This tablet does not support manual exposure, while the average tablet does. 63.6% of tablets support manual exposure.
  • No timelapse video
    This tablet does not support timelapse video, while the average tablet does. 57.5% of tablets support timelapse video.
  • Narrower main camera aperture
    This tablet has a narrower main camera aperture than the average tablet (f/2.4 vs f/2.2). The average tablet's main camera aperture is f/2.2.
    f/2.4 vs f/2.2
  • No fast charging
    This tablet does not support fast charging, while the average tablet does. 56.8% of tablets support fast charging.
  • 2 hours shorter battery life
    This tablet offers shorter battery life than the average tablet (8 hours vs 10 hours). The average tablet offers 10 hours of battery life.
    8 hours vs 10 hours
  • 41.1% slower charging
    This tablet charges slower than the average tablet (10.6 W vs 18 W). The average tablet charges at 18 W.
    10.6 W vs 18 W
  • No USB-C port
    This tablet does not have a USB Type-C port, while the average tablet does. 54% of tablets have one.
  • Older Wi-Fi standard
    This tablet has an older Wi-Fi standard than the average tablet (Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n) vs Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac)).
    Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n) vs Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac)
  • Older Bluetooth version
    This tablet has an older Bluetooth version than the average tablet (4 vs 5).
    4 vs 5
  • Shorter update support
    This tablet offers shorter update support than the average tablet (short vs medium). The average tablet gets medium of update support.
    short vs medium
  • No camera and mic privacy
    This tablet does not support camera and mic privacy, while the average tablet does. 56.6% of tablets offer this.
  • No multi-user mode
    User score
    8.0/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    Average of independent expert reviews and videos, graded by us; missing reviews count as 7/10.
    When it matters
    When you want to know how independent test sites and video reviewers rate the product in real use.
    Score distribution
    â–¼
    â–¼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    Samsung Galaxy Note 10.1 N8010
    the average tablet
    Samsung Galaxy Note 10.1 N8010 (2GB + 16GB) does not support multi-user mode, while the average tablet does. 73.8% of tablets offer this.
  • No full-page screenshots
    This tablet does not support full-page screenshots, the average tablet does. 53% of tablets support full-page screenshots.
  • No location privacy
    This tablet does not support location privacy, while the average tablet does. 76.7% of tablets offer this.
  • No dark mode
    This tablet does not support dark mode, while the average tablet does. 57.7% of tablets offer this.
  • 21.8% heavier
    This tablet is heavier than the average tablet (597 g vs 490 g). The average tablet weighs 490 g.
    597 g vs 490 g
  • 0.9 mm thicker
    This tablet is thicker than the average tablet (8.9 mm vs 8 mm). The average tablet is 8 mm thick.
    8.9 mm vs 8 mm
  • 62 mm taller
    This tablet is taller than the average tablet (262 mm vs 200 mm). The average tablet is 200 mm tall.
    262 mm vs 200 mm

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

7.0
Today We Review
≈ estimated
29/03/2020
Long-term use · media playback and connectivity
Verdict
Samsung Galaxy Note 10.1 N8010 is still a fine media tablet for secondary use, though its old software limits apps.
9.0
TheDigitalDigest
≈ estimated
25/11/2012
Full review · performance, camera, speakers and stylus tests
Verdict
Samsung Galaxy Note 10.1 N8010 is strongly recommended, especially for students who take handwritten notes, with only minor drawbacks.
7.0
DUGLESSM
≈ estimated
28/09/2012
Quick review · two weeks of use and split-screen tests
Verdict
Samsung Galaxy Note 10.1 N8010 is good for students who multitask; others may find better tablets for their needs.
9.0
SourceForge
≈ estimated
27/09/2012
Hands-on review · pen, multi-screen and browsing tests
Verdict
Samsung Galaxy Note 10.1 N8010 has multitasking and pen features that make it strong for pen work, typing and quick searches.
9.0
SourceForge
≈ estimated
27/09/2012
Full review · benchmark, multitasking and S Pen tests
Verdict
Samsung Galaxy Note 10.1 N8010 is very impressive for content creation and multitasking, though it is pricey next to the iPad.
8.0
HotHardware
≈ estimated
30/08/2012
Hands-on review · multiscreen, S Pen and display
Verdict
Samsung Galaxy Note 10.1 N8010 has a strong display and useful multi-window and pen features, though its resolution lags behind newer tablets.
9.0
The YouTube Tech Guy
≈ estimated
28/08/2012
Gaming review · PS3 controller and performance tests
Verdict
Samsung Galaxy Note 10.1 N8010 is good for gaming, with smooth performance and a vivid screen, especially with a PS3 controller.
6.0
DetroitBORG
≈ estimated
25/08/2012
Unboxing and review · design, speakers, screen and performance
Verdict
Samsung Galaxy Note 10.1 N8010 has an attractive design and loud speakers, but low screen resolution and sluggish multitasking hold it back.
8.0
PhoneBuff
≈ estimated
23/08/2012
Hands-on review · benchmarks, S Pen and speaker tests
Verdict
Samsung Galaxy Note 10.1 N8010 is good for note-taking and creative work, but it is a bit overpriced for what the screen offers.
7.0
PhoneArena
≈ estimated
20/08/2012
Hands-on review · S Pen, camera, performance and battery tests
Verdict
Samsung Galaxy Note 10.1 N8010 is a very average tablet with niche appeal for artists and note-takers, and decent value for its price.
9.0
adrianisen
≈ estimated
30/03/2013
Durability test · knife and hammer scratch test
Verdict
Samsung Galaxy Note 10.1 N8010 is strong and durable, offering good protection mainly for the front.
8.0
PhoneBuff
≈ estimated
17/08/2012
Benchmark tests · speed and browser scores
Verdict
Samsung Galaxy Note 10.1 N8010 posts top-tier speed in benchmarks, with no lag noticed so far.
More graded video reviews (2)
creator’s own scoreestimated by us

Third-party reviews

What customers like about Samsung Galaxy Note 10.1 N8010 (2GB + 16GB)

  • Innovative S Pen stylus functionality with 1,024 levels of pressure sensitivity for note-taking and drawing
  • True multitasking capabilities including a side-by-side split-screen mode for running two apps at once
  • Strong performance at launch powered by a 1.4GHz quad-core processor and 2GB of RAM
  • Excellent storage flexibility with a built-in microSD slot for easy expansion
  • Front-facing stereo speakers that provide clear sound directed toward the user
  • Lightweight and slim design for a 10.1-inch tablet, making it comfortable to hold in portrait mode

What customers don't like about Samsung Galaxy Note 10.1 N8010 (2GB + 16GB)

  • Plastic build quality that many users felt was cheap, creaky, and prone to flexing
  • Low screen resolution (1280x800) that fell behind competitors like the Retina iPad
  • Use of a proprietary Samsung charging and data connector instead of a standard micro-USB
  • Occasional software lag or 'visual stutter' caused by the heavy TouchWiz UI overlay
  • Reflective display surface that can be difficult to view in bright outdoor sunlight
  • Limited number of apps that initially supported the signature split-screen feature

Verdict

The Samsung Galaxy Note 10.1 N8010 is a Wi-Fi-only tablet featuring a 10.1-inch PLS LCD display with a 1280 x 800 resolution and a 1.4 GHz quad-core Exynos 4412 processor. This model is equipped with 2GB of RAM and 16GB of internal storage, expandable up to 64GB via a microSD slot, and includes a 5MP rear camera with LED flash and a 1.9MP front camera. Its primary characteristics include the integrated S Pen with 1,024 levels of pressure sensitivity, front-facing stereo speakers, and a 7,000 mAh battery. Main pros consist of its smooth multitasking capabilities via split-screen features, strong overall performance for its era, and the high precision offered by the Wacom-powered stylus. However, notable cons include a relatively low-resolution display compared to its contemporaries, a build quality that feels somewhat plasticky and prone to flexing, and a proprietary charging connector.

Compare Samsung Galaxy Note 10.1 N8010 (2GB + 16GB) with other tablets

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Samsung Galaxy Note 10.1 N8010 (2GB + 16GB) and other tablets

No results found