Scored using Tablets Methodology v1.0
Tablets Methodology v1.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontum Tablets Methodology v1.0: technical specifications plus authentic consumer ratings, with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Tablets Methodology v1.0

Oneplus Pad Go WiFi (8GB + 256GB) Review | 168 Data compared

Avg. price:~£290RAM capacity:8 GBInternal storage:256 GBScreen size:11.35 inchesChipset:MediaTek Helio G99

Oneplus Pad Go WiFi (8GB + 256GB) Review: Compare 168 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Tablets category and whether it is worth buying.

7.5/10

Overall score

Score
7.5/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the smartphone's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best Tablets on the market.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

90%

7.5

Technical score

10%

8.1

User score

â–²Better than 78% of tablets
8.0

Value for money

Value for money
8.0/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the smartphone's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a smartphone with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

7.5

Overall score

30%

9.0

Price

â–²Better than 83%
7.5

Technical score

Technical score
7.5/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of the smartphone's technical performance, covering eight key areas: performance & hardware, software, camera, connectivity, display, battery, audio, and design.
When it matters
When you want to compare Tablets based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

22%

7.3

Performance

20%

7.0

Display

16%

7.1

Camera

14%

8.5

Battery

12%

7.4

Connectivity

8%

8.9

Software & Features

5%

6.3

Design

3%

7.8

Audio & Multimedia

â–²Better than 78%
8.1

User score

User score
8.1/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the smartphone
When it matters
When you want to know how a smartphone handles daily tasks and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

10

User ratings

30%

3.7

Number of reviews

â–²Better than 74%
  • No image
No image
Where to buy
    N/A~ £290
Available versions:
Other versions:
8GB + 256GB
Loading...
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of tablet Oneplus Pad Go WiFi (8GB + 256GB)

Technical score
Technical score
7.5/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of the smartphone's technical performance, covering eight key areas: performance & hardware, software, camera, connectivity, display, battery, audio, and design.
When it matters
When you want to compare Tablets based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

22%

7.3

Performance

20%

7.0

Display

16%

7.1

Camera

14%

8.5

Battery

12%

7.4

Connectivity

8%

8.9

Software & Features

5%

6.3

Design

3%

7.8

Audio & Multimedia

7.5
User score
User score
8.1/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the smartphone
When it matters
When you want to know how a smartphone handles daily tasks and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

10

User ratings

30%

3.7

Number of reviews

8.1
Popularity
Popularity
3.7/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the smartphone.
When it matters
When you prefer to purchase a product chosen and reviewed by many other consumers.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Popularity:
Oneplus Pad Go WiFi (8GB + 256GB) has a popularity of 3.7 points, which is higher than 56.7% of Tablets.
3.7
Value for money
Value for money
8.0/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the smartphone's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a smartphone with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

70%

7.5

Overall score

30%

9.0

Price

8.0
RAM capacity
8 GB
This tablet has a RAM capacity of 8 GB which is larger than the RAM capacity of 72.3% of tablets and equal to that of 17.8% of tablets.
Process node
6 nm
This tablet is built on a 6 nm process node, which is smaller than the node size used in 76.4% of tablets and equal to the node used in 8.2% of tablets.
Internal storage
256 GB
This tablet has an internal storage capacity of 256 GB which is larger than the storage of 76.5% of tablets and equal to that of 15.7% of tablets.
Geekbench 6 single-core benchmark score
729 points
This tablet scored 729 points in Geekbench 6 (single-core) which is higher than the score of 47.7% of tablets and equal to the score of 2.9% of tablets.
Chipset
MediaTek Helio G99
This tablet uses the MediaTek Helio G99 chipset, which is less advanced than the chipsets in 50.9% of tablets and equal to those in 2.9% of tablets.
Show more
Screen resolution
2408×1720
This tablet has a screen resolution of 2408×1720 which is higher than that of 87.7% of tablets and equal to that of 0.2% of tablets.
Refresh rate
90 Hz
This tablet supports a refresh rate of 90 Hz which is higher than in 73.8% of tablets and equal to that in 6.5% of tablets.
Display type
IPS LCD
This tablet uses a IPS LCD display type. 17% of tablets use this display technology.
Pixel density
260 ppi
This tablet has a pixel density of 260 ppi which is higher than that of 70.2% of tablets and equal to that of 0.2% of tablets.
Display glass type
Corning Gorilla Glass
This tablet uses Corning Gorilla Glass display glass which is stronger than that on 45.4% of tablets and equal to that on 32.7% of tablets.
Show more
Optical image stabilization
no
This tablet does not support optical image stabilization. 0.4% of tablets include OIS.
Main camera megapixels
8 MP
This tablet has a main camera resolution of 8 MP which is higher than that of 36.5% of tablets and equal to that of 31.8% of tablets.
Front camera megapixels
8 MP
This tablet has a front camera resolution of 8 MP which is higher than in 69.7% of tablets and equal to that in 19.5% of tablets.
Main camera aperture
f/2.0
This tablet has a main camera aperture of f/2.0 which is wider than that of 57.5% of tablets and equal to that of 24.5% of tablets.
Optical zoom
1xxx
This tablet supports 1xx optical zoom which is higher than in 18.4% of tablets and equal to that in 80.7% of tablets.
Show more
Battery capacity
8,000 mAh
This tablet has a battery capacity of 8,000 mAh which is larger than the batteries in 70.6% of tablets and equal to those in 3.9% of tablets.
Charging speed
33 W
This tablet supports charging speeds of 33 W which is faster than in 74.8% of tablets and equal to speeds in 2.9% of tablets.
Battery life
14 hours
This tablet has a battery life of 14 hours, which is longer than that of 81.5% of tablets and equal to that of 3.5% of tablets.
video playback
Wireless charging
no
This tablet does not support wireless charging. 1.5% of tablets support wireless charging.
Fast charging
yes
This tablet supports fast charging. 50.4% of tablets support fast charging.
Show more
LTE support
yes
This tablet supports LTE. 36.8% of tablets include LTE connectivity.
Wi-Fi connectivity
yes
This tablet supports Wi-Fi connectivity. 0.2% of tablets offer Wi-Fi support.
GPS
yes
This tablet supports GPS. 17.3% of tablets include GPS functionality.
5G connectivity
no
This tablet does not support 5G connectivity. 11.1% of tablets support 5G.
NFC
no
This tablet does not support NFC. 10.9% of tablets support NFC.
Show more
Operating system
Android
This tablet uses the Android operating system, which is more advanced than the one used by 23.3%.
Update support duration
medium
This tablet offers medium update support, which is longer than the support period of 47.3% of tablets and equal to that of 32.6% of tablets.
Direct OS updates
yes
This tablet receives direct OS updates. 20.3% of tablets receive direct updates.
On-device AI
no
This tablet does not support on-device AI. 28.3% of tablets support this capability.
App tracking protection
?
Show more
IP rating
not rated
This tablet has an IP rating of not rated which is lower than that of 16.3% of tablets and equal to that of 83.7% of tablets.
Weight
532 g
This tablet weighs 532 g which is heavier than 62.6% of tablets and equal to the weight of 0.3% of tablets.
Backlit keyboard
yes
This tablet supports a backlit keyboard. 90.3% of tablets support backlit keyboards.
Keyboard accessory
yes
This tablet supports a keyboard accessory. 15.8% of tablets support this option.
Pen latency
N/A
Show more
Number of microphones
?
aptX Adaptive
no
This tablet does not support aptX Adaptive. 6.9% of tablets offer this codec.
Dolby Atmos support
yes
This tablet supports Dolby Atmos. 68.6% of tablets support Dolby Atmos.
N. of speakers
4
This tablet includes 4 speakers, which is more than in 70.9% of tablets and equal to the number in 22.7% of tablets.
FM radio
no
This tablet does not include an FM radio. 19% of tablets offer FM radio functionality.
Show more

Oneplus Pad Go WiFi (8GB + 256GB) vs the average tablet

246810TotalPerformanceDisplayCameraBatteryConnectivitySoftware & FeaturesDesignAudio & Multimedia
  • 4 hours longer battery life
    This tablet offers longer battery life than the average tablet (14 hours vs 10 hours). The average tablet offers 10 hours of battery life.
    video playback
    14 hours vs 10 hours
  • 4x more storage
    This tablet has more internal storage than the average tablet (256 GB vs 64 GB). The average tablet provides 64 GB of internal storage.
    256 GB vs 64 GB
  • Faster storage type
    This tablet uses UFS storage, while the average tablet uses eMMC. Storage technology still varies widely across tablets.
    UFS vs eMMC
  • 50% higher refresh rate
    This tablet has a higher refresh rate than the average tablet (90 Hz vs 60 Hz). The average tablet has refresh rate of 60 Hz.
    90 Hz vs 60 Hz
  • Higher screen resolution
    This tablet has a higher screen resolution than the average tablet (2408×1720 vs 1920×1200). The average tablet resolution is 1920×1200.
    2408×1720 vs 1920×1200
  • Supports adaptive refresh rate
    This tablet has adaptive refresh rate, the average tablet does not. 17.6% of tablets support adaptive refresh rate.
  • 4 GB more RAM
    This tablet has more RAM capacity than the average tablet (8 GB vs 4 GB). The average tablet has 4 GB of RAM.
    8 GB vs 4 GB
  • 3 MP higher front camera megapixels
    This tablet has more front camera megapixels than the average tablet (8 MP vs 5 MP). The average tablet has 5 MP front camera resolution.
    8 MP vs 5 MP
  • 12.4% better value for money
    Oneplus Pad Go WiFi (8GB + 256GB) has better value for money than the average tablet (7.98 vs 7.1).
    7.98 vs 7.1
  • 4x more storage
    This tablet has more internal storage than the average tablet (256 GB vs 64 GB). The average tablet provides 64 GB of internal storage.
    256 GB vs 64 GB
  • Faster storage type
    This tablet uses UFS storage, while the average tablet uses eMMC. Storage technology still varies widely across tablets.
    UFS vs eMMC
  • 4 GB more RAM
    This tablet has more RAM capacity than the average tablet (8 GB vs 4 GB). The average tablet has 4 GB of RAM.
    8 GB vs 4 GB
  • More capable chipset
    This tablet uses the MediaTek Helio G99 chipset, while the average tablet uses MediaTek MT8169A.
    MediaTek Helio G99 vs MediaTek MT8169A
  • 57.1% smaller process node
    This tablet uses a smaller process node than the average tablet (6 nm vs 14 nm). The average tablet uses a process node of 14 nm.
    6 nm vs 14 nm
  • Newer DDR memory version
    This tablet supports a newer DDR version than the average tablet (LPDDR4X vs LPDDR3). The average DDR version is LPDDR3.
    LPDDR4X vs LPDDR3
  • 2 more CPU threads
    This tablet has more CPU threads than the average tablet (8 vs 6). The average tablet has 6 CPU threads.
    8 vs 6
  • 10% higher CPU speed
    This tablet has a higher CPU speed than the average tablet (2.2 GHz vs 2 GHz). The average tablet has CPU speed of 2 GHz.
    2.2 GHz vs 2 GHz
  • Better GPU
    This tablet uses the Mali-G57 MC2 GPU, while the average tablet uses Mali-G51. GPU choice is one of the main performance differences between tablets.
    Mali-G57 MC2 vs Mali-G51
  • 50% higher refresh rate
    This tablet has a higher refresh rate than the average tablet (90 Hz vs 60 Hz). The average tablet has refresh rate of 60 Hz.
    90 Hz vs 60 Hz
  • Higher screen resolution
    This tablet has a higher screen resolution than the average tablet (2408×1720 vs 1920×1200). The average tablet resolution is 1920×1200.
    2408×1720 vs 1920×1200
  • Supports adaptive refresh rate
    This tablet has adaptive refresh rate, the average tablet does not. 17.6% of tablets support adaptive refresh rate.
  • 1.25 inches larger screen size
    This tablet has a higher screen size than the average tablet (11.4 inches vs 10.1 inches). The average tablet has screen size of 10.1 inches.
    11.35 inches vs 10.1 inches
  • Higher contrast ratio
    This tablet has a higher contrast ratio than the average tablet (1500:1 vs 1015:1). The average tablet contrast ratio is 1015:1.
    1,500:1 vs 1,015:1
  • 2,160 Hz higher PWM dimming frequency
    This tablet has a higher PWM dimming frequency than the average tablet (2,160 Hz vs 0 Hz). The average tablet has PWM dimming frequency of 0 Hz.
    Below 70 nits only.
    2,160 Hz vs 0 Hz
  • 16.1% higher pixel density
    This tablet has a higher pixel density than the average tablet (260 ppi vs 224 ppi). The average tablet has pixel density of 224 ppi.
    260 ppi vs 224 ppi
  • 39 ppi higher screen sharpness
    This tablet has a higher screen sharpness than the average tablet (260 ppi vs 221 ppi). The average tablet has screen sharpness of 221 ppi.
    260 ppi vs 221 ppi
  • 50% higher touch sampling rate
    This tablet has a higher touch sampling rate than the average tablet (180 Hz vs 120 Hz). The average tablet has touch sampling rate of 120 Hz.
    180 Hz vs 120 Hz
  • 3 MP higher front camera megapixels
    This tablet has more front camera megapixels than the average tablet (8 MP vs 5 MP). The average tablet has 5 MP front camera resolution.
    8 MP vs 5 MP
  • Allows manual ISO
    This tablet allows manual ISO adjustment, the average tablet does not. 46% of tablets feature manual ISO.
  • Wider main camera aperture
    This tablet has a better main camera aperture than the average tablet (f/2 vs f/2.2). The average tablet uses f/2.2 main camera aperture.
    f/2.0 vs f/2.2
  • 4 hours longer battery life
    This tablet offers longer battery life than the average tablet (14 hours vs 10 hours). The average tablet offers 10 hours of battery life.
    video playback
    14 hours vs 10 hours
  • Supports fast charging
    This tablet supports fast charging, the average tablet does not. 49.7% of tablets feature fast charging.
  • 83.3% faster charging speed
    This tablet supports faster charging than the average tablet (33 W vs 18 W). The average tablet supports charging speed of 18 W.
    33 W vs 18 W
  • Includes battery health monitoring
    This tablet features battery health monitoring, the average tablet does not. 37% of tablets include battery health tools.
  • 21.6% larger battery capacity
    This tablet has a higher battery capacity than the average tablet (8,000 mAh vs 6,580 mAh). The average tablet battery has capacity of 6,580 mAh.
    8,000 mAh vs 6,580 mAh
  • Newer Bluetooth version
    This tablet supports a newer Bluetooth version than the average tablet (5.2 vs 5). The average tablet uses Bluetooth 5.0.
    5.2 vs 5.0
  • Supports live text recognition
    This tablet supports live text recognition, the average tablet does not. 34.9% of tablets can recognize text from images.
  • Allows app offloading
    This tablet allows app offloading, the average tablet does not. 26.4% of tablets support app offloading.
  • Supports dynamic theme
    This tablet features dynamic themes, the average tablet does not. 29% of tablets offer dynamic theming.
  • Supports extra dim mode
    This tablet features extra dim mode, the average tablet does not. 35.4% of tablets support extra diming.
  • Includes clipboard warnings
    This tablet has clipboard warnings, the average tablet does not. 39.9% of tablets include clipboard warnings.
  • Includes backlit keyboard
    This tablet has a backlit keyboard, the average tablet does not. 9.8% of tablets offer a backlit keyboard.
  • 1.1 mm thinner
    This tablet is thinner than the average tablet (6.9 mm vs 8 mm). The average tablet is 8.0 mm thick.
    6.9 mm vs 8.0 mm
  • 4 newer release date
    This tablet has a newer release date than the average tablet (2023 vs 2019).
    October 2023
    2023 vs 2019
  • 2 more speakers
    This tablet has more speakers than the average tablet (4 vs 2). The average tablet has 2 speakers.
    4 vs 2
  • Supports Dolby Atmos
    This tablet supports Dolby Atmos, the average tablet does not. 31.5% of tablets support Dolby Atmos.
  • Supports LDAC
    This tablet supports LDAC, the average tablet does not. 25.2% of tablets support LDAC.
  • No continuous video AF
    This tablet does not support continuous video AF, the average tablet does. 57.7% of tablets support continuous video autofocus.
  • No 3.5 mm headphone jack
    This tablet does not have a 3.5 mm headphone jack, the average tablet does. 72.9% of tablets include a headphone jack.
  • No panorama mode
    This tablet does not have a panorama mode, the average tablet does. 78.6% of tablets include panorama features.
  • No timelapse video
    This tablet does not support timelapse video, the average tablet does. 57.5% of tablets include timelapse modes.
  • Narrower front camera aperture
    This tablet has a worse front camera aperture than the average tablet (f/2.3 vs f/2.2). The average tablet uses f/2.2 front camera aperture.
    f/2.3 vs f/2.2
  • No HDMI output
    This tablet does not have an HDMI output, the average tablet does. 50.1% of tablets support HDMI output.
  • 8.6% heavier
    This tablet is heavier than the average tablet (532 g vs 490 g). The average tablet weighs 490 g.
    532 g vs 490 g
  • 55.1 mm taller
    This tablet is taller than the average tablet (255.1 mm vs 200 mm). The average tablet is 200.0 mm tall.
    255.1 mm vs 200.0 mm
  • 2 fewer GPU execution units
    This tablet has less GPU execution units than the average tablet (2 vs 4). The average tablet has 4 GPU execution units.
    2 vs 4
  • 1 nits lower peak brightness
    This tablet has a lower peak brightness than the average tablet (400 nits vs 401 nits). The average tablet reaches 401 nits peak brightness.
    400 nits vs 401 nits
  • No continuous video AF
    This tablet does not support continuous video AF, the average tablet does. 57.7% of tablets support continuous video autofocus.
  • No panorama mode
    This tablet does not have a panorama mode, the average tablet does. 78.6% of tablets include panorama features.
  • No timelapse video
    This tablet does not support timelapse video, the average tablet does. 57.5% of tablets include timelapse modes.
  • Narrower front camera aperture
    This tablet has a worse front camera aperture than the average tablet (f/2.3 vs f/2.2). The average tablet uses f/2.2 front camera aperture.
    f/2.3 vs f/2.2
  • No HDMI output
    This tablet does not have an HDMI output, the average tablet does. 50.1% of tablets support HDMI output.
  • 8.6% heavier
    This tablet is heavier than the average tablet (532 g vs 490 g). The average tablet weighs 490 g.
    532 g vs 490 g
  • 55.1 mm taller
    This tablet is taller than the average tablet (255.1 mm vs 200 mm). The average tablet is 200.0 mm tall.
    255.1 mm vs 200.0 mm
  • No 3.5 mm headphone jack
    This tablet does not have a 3.5 mm headphone jack, the average tablet does. 72.9% of tablets include a headphone jack.

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

Not graded yet
Not graded yet
Not graded yet
Not graded yet
Not graded yet
Not graded yet
Not graded yet
Not graded yet
Not graded yet
Not graded yet
Not graded yet
Not graded yet

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

T
thehindu.com
04/11/2023
Summary of the review
T
thehindubusinessline.com
15/11/2023
Summary of the review
T
trustedreviews.com
08/05/2024
Summary of the review
T
t3.com
08/05/2024
Summary of the review
U
uswitch.com
28/05/2024
Summary of the review
F
forbes.com
16/06/2024
Summary of the review
T
techradar.com
20/06/2024
Summary of the review
C
coolsmartphone.com
30/06/2024
Summary of the review
F
forbes.com
28/11/2023
Summary of the review
D
digitalcameraworld.com
04/12/2024
Summary of the review
T
tuttoandroid.net
23/04/2026
Summary of the review
A
andreagaleazzi.com
23/04/2026
Summary of the review
A
androidplanet.nl
27/05/2024
Summary of the review
F
fwd.nl
22/05/2024
Summary of the review
I
id.nl
11/05/2024
Summary of the review
C
ct.nl
02/07/2024
Summary of the review
A
androidworld.nl
15/06/2024
Summary of the review
D
digitailing.nl
28/05/2024
Summary of the review
T
technologyinsider.nl
02/06/2024
Summary of the review
T
techpulse.be
21/06/2024
Summary of the review

Third-party reviews

What customers like about Oneplus Pad Go WiFi (8GB + 256GB)

  • High-resolution 2.4K display that is sharp and vibrant for media
  • Excellent quad-speaker setup with Dolby Atmos support providing loud, clear audio
  • Affordable price point offering high value compared to competitors like the iPad
  • Solid battery life that typically lasts all day with casual usage
  • Clean and intuitive OxygenOS software with minimal bloatware
  • Lightweight and slim design that is comfortable for long periods of handheld use

What customers don't like about Oneplus Pad Go WiFi (8GB + 256GB)

  • Performance can be slow or choppy during intensive multitasking or high-end gaming
  • Highly reflective screen makes viewing difficult in bright environments or for dark movie scenes
  • Lacks a fingerprint sensor, relying instead on facial unlock or PINs
  • Charging speed (33W) is slower than the flagship OnePlus Pad and can take up to 2 hours for a full charge
  • Lack of official accessories like a first-party keyboard or advanced stylus support compared to premium models
  • Camera quality is middling and struggles in low-light conditions

Verdict

The OnePlus Pad Go WiFi (8GB + 256GB) is an entertainment-focused tablet featuring an 11.35-inch 2.4K LCD display with a 90Hz refresh rate and a unique 7:5 aspect ratio for comfortable reading. It is powered by a MediaTek Helio G99 processor and 8GB of RAM, supported by a 8,000mAh battery with 33W fast charging and quad speakers with Dolby Atmos. Main pros include its sharp high-resolution screen, sleek two-tone design, and generous storage with microSD expansion up to 1TB. However, notable cons include the lack of a fingerprint sensor, a highly reflective screen that can struggle in bright light, and limited performance for high-end gaming or heavy multitasking.

Compare Oneplus Pad Go WiFi (8GB + 256GB) with other tablets

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Oneplus Pad Go WiFi (8GB + 256GB) and other tablets

No results found