OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS
Scored using Tablets Methodology v3.0
Tablets Methodology v3.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontum Tablets Methodology v3.0: the technical score from the specifications is the base, and independent expert and video reviews (up to ±0.5 points), owner opinions (up to ±0.3) and best-of lists (up to +0.3) move it up or down.
Explore Tablets Methodology v3.0

Motorola Xoom 2 MZ615 (1GB + 16GB) review: 168 specs compared

Avg. price:~£180RAM capacity:1 GBInternal storage:16 GBScreen size:10.1 inchesChipset:TI OMAP 4430

Motorola Xoom 2 MZ615 (1GB + 16GB) Review: Compare 168 technical specifications and 18 expert and video reviews to see how this product ranks in the Tablets category and whether it is worth buying.

6.0/10

Overall score

Score
6.0/ 10
✕
What it is
Our main score for this model, 1–10. It combines specs, best-of lists, expert reviews and owners.
How we count it
Parts: Technical score 35%, List score 30%, Reviews score 25%, Sentiment score 10%
Marks: Each part gets a mark out of 10. For reviews, lists and owners, a typical model in this category gets about 8 and the best one gets 10.
No data yet: A part with no data shows "?". It counts as the mark of a weaker model in this category (4 in 5 models with data score higher). This way, models with reviews, lists and owners usually come out ahead.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 86% of models
Score components

35%

5.1

Technical score

30%

?

List scoreNot enough data yet, so we use 7.5, the mark of a weaker model in this category

25%

5.1

Reviews score

10%

?

Sentiment scoreNot enough data yet, so we use 6.9, the mark of a weaker model in this category

â–¼Worse than 86% of tablets
7.1

Value for money

Value for money
7.1/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the tablet's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a tablet with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 78% of models
Score components

70%

6.0

Overall score

30%

9.6

Price

â–¼Worse than 78%
5.1

Technical score

Technical score
5.1/ 10
✕
What it is
How good the specs are compared with the other models in this category, 1–10.
How we count it
Areas: We rate the specs in each area against the other models in this category.
Weighting: The areas that matter most to buyers count more. The shares are shown under Score components.
Share: The technical score is 35% of the overall score.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 82% of models
Score components

22%

4.1

Performance

20%

5.6

Display

16%

5.2

Camera

14%

4.6

Battery

12%

5.7

Connectivity

8%

6.1

Software

5%

5.9

Design

3%

5.5

Audio

â–¼Worse than 82%
5.1

Reviews score

Reviews score
5.1/ 10
✕
What it is
Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
How we count it
Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves. Big test sites count more, short reviews half as much as full tests. A video review counts half.
Score: The average grade is 80% of the review mark; the number of reviews is the other 20% (1 review = 5, the typical number in this category = 8, the most-reviewed model = 10).
Enough data: With few reviews, the average grade is pulled toward the typical grade of this category. No reviews yet: 7.4 for now.
Share: Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 88% of models

5.1

Mark 7.5 is below the typical mark 7.8 of this category, so it cannot lift the score above the technical score

80%

7.3

Average grade

20%

8.3

Popularity

Grades by review (18)
13 reviews: 11 with a printed score, 2 estimated from the review. 5 video reviews, each counting half as much as a written test. Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
User ratings collected online are not part of this score.
â–¼Worse than 88%
?

List score

List score
7.5/ 10
✕
What it is
How often independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers put this model in their best-of lists for this category.
How we count it
Points: The model in the most lists of this category gets 10; the others get 8 to 10 in proportion. In no list yet: 7.5. Lists count 30% of the overall score.
Enough data: Every list counts, even a single one. With fewer than 5 best-of lists in the category, this part is left out.
Lists with this model (0)
Not in any best-of list yet, so this part counts as 7.5. Models in a list get 8 to 10.
Not in any best-of list yet
  • No image
No image
Where to buy
    N/A~ £180
Best rankings
Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Other versions:
1GB + 16GB1GB + 32GB

What reviewers say about the Motorola Xoom 2 MZ615 (1GB + 16GB)

Based on 13 · 5

Reviewers love the sleek design, but are split on screen and battery, and complain about the outdated Android version.
Praised
Mixed views
Criticised
Pick a topic to see who said what
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of tablet Motorola Xoom 2 MZ615 (1GB + 16GB)

Technical score
Technical score
5.1/ 10
✕
What it is
How good the specs are compared with the other models in this category, 1–10.
How we count it
Areas: We rate the specs in each area against the other models in this category.
Weighting: The areas that matter most to buyers count more. The shares are shown under Score components.
Share: The technical score is 35% of the overall score.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 82% of models
Score components:

22%

4.1

Performance

20%

5.6

Display

16%

5.2

Camera

14%

4.6

Battery

12%

5.7

Connectivity

8%

6.1

Software

5%

5.9

Design

3%

5.5

Audio

5.1
Reviews score
5.1
List score
?
Value for money
Value for money
7.1/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the tablet's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a tablet with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 78% of models
Score components:

70%

6.0

Overall score

30%

9.6

Price

7.1
RAM capacity
1 GB
Market range: <1 GB – >8 GB
This tablet has 1 GB of RAM, which is less than 78% of tablets and equal to 19.1% of tablets.
Process node
45 nm
Market range: <4 nm – >40 nm
This tablet is built on a 45 nm process, which is larger than 94.9% of tablets and equal to 4.4% of tablets.
Internal storage
16 GB
Market range: <16 GB – >256 GB
This tablet has 16 GB of internal storage, which is less than 78.8% of tablets and equal to 14.8% of tablets.
Geekbench 6 single-core score
?
Chipset
TI OMAP 4430
This tablet runs on TI OMAP 4430, which is less advanced than 68.4% of tablets and equal to 2.1% of tablets.
Show more
What reviewers say
Screen resolution
1280×800
This tablet has a 1280×800 screen, which is less sharp than 68.1% of tablets and equal to 21.7% of tablets.
Refresh rate
?
Display type
IPS LCD
This tablet uses a IPS LCD display type. 17% of tablets use this display technology.
Pixel density
149 ppi
Market range: <149 ppi – >291 ppi
This tablet has a pixel density of 149 ppi, which is lower than 86.8% of tablets and equal to 9.2% of tablets.
Display glass type
Chemically Strengthened Glass
This tablet protects its screen with Chemically Strengthened Glass, which is less durable than 65.1% of tablets and the same as 12.9% of tablets.
Show more
What reviewers say
Optical image stabilization
no
This tablet does not support optical stabilisation. 0.4% of tablets offer this.
Main camera megapixels
5 MP
Market range: <3.15 MP – >13 MP
This tablet has a rear camera with 5 MP resolution, which is lower than 63.7% of tablets and equal to 26% of tablets.
Front camera megapixels
1.3 MP
Market range: <1.2 MP – >9 MP
This tablet has a front camera with 1.3 MP resolution, which is lower than 80.9% of tablets and equal to 5.4% of tablets.
Main camera aperture
?
Optical zoom
N/A
Show more
What reviewers say
Battery capacity
7,000 mAh
Market range: <4k mAh – >10.1k mAh
This tablet has 7,000 mAh battery capacity, which is larger than 53.7% of tablets and equal to 3.6% of tablets.
Charging speed
10 W
Market range: <10 W – >45 W
This tablet charges at 10 W, which is slower than 60.9% of tablets and equal to 33.3% of tablets.
Battery life
10 hours
Market range: <7 hours – >16 hours
This tablet has a battery life of 10 hours, which is longer than that of 39.1% of tablets and equal to that of 20.5% of tablets.
video playback
Wireless charging
no
This tablet does not support wireless charging. 1.5% of tablets offer this.
Fast charging
no
This tablet does not support fast charging. 56.9% of tablets offer this.
Show more
What reviewers say
LTE support
no
This tablet does not have built-in LTE. 42.9% of tablets offer this.
Wi-Fi connectivity
yes
This tablet connects to Wi-Fi. 0.2% of tablets offer this.
GPS
yes
This tablet has built-in GPS. 17.1% of tablets offer this.
5G connectivity
no
This tablet does not support 5G. 8.1% of tablets offer this.
NFC
no
This tablet does not include NFC. 10.8% of tablets offer this.
Show more
What reviewers say
Operating system
Android
This tablet uses the Android operating system, which is more advanced than the one used by 23.2%.
Update support duration
short
This tablet offers short update support, which is shorter than the support period of 52.4% of tablets and equal to that of 47.6% of tablets.
Direct OS updates
yes
This tablet supports direct OS updates. 20.3% of tablets offer this.
On-device AI
no
This tablet does not support on-device AI. 28.3% of tablets support this capability.
App tracking protection
no
This tablet does not support app tracking protection. 28.4% of tablets offer this.
Show more
What reviewers say
IP rating
?
Weight
599 g
Market range: <315 g – >730 g
This tablet weighs 599 g, which is heavier than 76.2% of tablets and equal to 0.7% of tablets.
Backlit keyboard
no
This tablet does not support a backlit keyboard. 9.7% of tablets support backlit keyboards.
Keyboard accessory
yes
This tablet supports a keyboard accessory. 15.8% of tablets support this option.
Pen latency
N/A
Show more
What reviewers say
Number of microphones
?
aptX Adaptive
no
This tablet does not support aptX Adaptive. 6.9% of tablets offer this.
Dolby Atmos support
no
This tablet does not support Dolby Atmos. 31.3% of tablets support Dolby Atmos.
N. of speakers
2
Market range: <2 – >4
This tablet includes 2 speakers, which is more than in 9.8% of tablets and equal to the number in 60.8% of tablets.
FM radio
no
This tablet does not include an FM radio. 19% of tablets offer this.
Show more
What reviewers say

Motorola Xoom 2 MZ615 (1GB + 16GB) vs the average tablet

246810TotalPerformanceDisplayCameraBatteryConnectivitySoftwareDesignAudio
  • 78 nits higher typical brightness
    This tablet has a higher typical brightness than the average tablet (478 nits vs 400 nits). The average tablet reaches 400 nits typical brightness.
    478 nits vs 400 nits
  • More advanced chipset
    This tablet has a more advanced chipset than the average tablet (TI OMAP 4430 vs MediaTek MT8169A).
    TI OMAP 4,430 vs MediaTek MT8169A
  • Built-in camera flash
    This tablet has a camera flash, while the average tablet does not. 45.5% of tablets have one.
  • Supports HDMI output
    This tablet supports HDMI output, while the average tablet does not. 49.8% of tablets offer this.
    HDMI port
  • 235 Hz higher PWM dimming frequency
    This tablet has a higher PWM dimming frequency than the average tablet (235 Hz vs 0 Hz). The average tablet has PWM dimming frequency of 0 Hz.
    235 Hz vs 0 Hz
  • More advanced chipset
    This tablet has a more advanced chipset than the average tablet (TI OMAP 4430 vs MediaTek MT8169A).
    TI OMAP 4,430 vs MediaTek MT8169A
  • 78 nits higher typical brightness
    This tablet has a higher typical brightness than the average tablet (478 nits vs 400 nits). The average tablet reaches 400 nits typical brightness.
    478 nits vs 400 nits
  • 235 Hz higher PWM dimming frequency
    This tablet has a higher PWM dimming frequency than the average tablet (235 Hz vs 0 Hz). The average tablet has PWM dimming frequency of 0 Hz.
    235 Hz vs 0 Hz
  • Built-in camera flash
    This tablet has a camera flash, while the average tablet does not. 45.5% of tablets have one.
  • Supports HDMI output
    This tablet supports HDMI output, while the average tablet does not. 49.8% of tablets offer this.
    HDMI port
  • 6 fewer CPU threads
    This tablet has fewer CPU threads than the average tablet (2 vs 8). The average tablet has 8 CPU threads.
    2 vs 8
  • 3.7 MP lower front resolution
    This tablet has a lower-resolution front camera than the average tablet (1.3 MP vs 5 MP). The average tablet has a front camera of 5 MP.
    1.3 MP vs 5 MP
  • No USB-C port
    This tablet does not have a USB Type-C port, while the average tablet does. 54% of tablets have one.
  • 27.1% lower review score
    Reviews score
    5.1/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
    How we count it
    Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves. Big test sites count more, short reviews half as much as full tests. A video review counts half.
    Score: The average grade is 80% of the review mark; the number of reviews is the other 20% (1 review = 5, the typical number in this category = 8, the most-reviewed model = 10).
    Enough data: With few reviews, the average grade is pulled toward the typical grade of this category. No reviews yet: 7.4 for now.
    Share: Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
    Score distribution
    â–¼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    â–¼ Worse than 88% of models

    5.1

    Mark 7.5 is below the typical mark 7.8 of this category, so it cannot lift the score above the technical score

    80%

    7.3

    Average grade

    20%

    8.3

    Popularity

    Grades by review (18)
    13 reviews: 11 with a printed score, 2 estimated from the review. 5 video reviews, each counting half as much as a written test. Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
    User ratings collected online are not part of this score.
    5.1 vs 7.0
  • 3 GB less RAM
    This tablet has less RAM than the average tablet (1 GB vs 4 GB). The average tablet has 4 GB of RAM.
    1 GB vs 4 GB
  • Shorter update support
    This tablet offers shorter update support than the average tablet (short vs medium). The average tablet gets medium of update support.
    short vs medium
  • No fast charging
    This tablet does not support fast charging, while the average tablet does. 56.8% of tablets support fast charging.
  • 40% lower CPU speed
    This tablet has a lower CPU speed than the average tablet (1.2 GHz vs 2 GHz). The average tablet has CPU speed of 2 GHz.
    1.2 GHz vs 2 GHz
  • 27.1% lower review score
    Reviews score
    5.1/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
    How we count it
    Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves. Big test sites count more, short reviews half as much as full tests. A video review counts half.
    Score: The average grade is 80% of the review mark; the number of reviews is the other 20% (1 review = 5, the typical number in this category = 8, the most-reviewed model = 10).
    Enough data: With few reviews, the average grade is pulled toward the typical grade of this category. No reviews yet: 7.4 for now.
    Share: Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
    Score distribution
    â–¼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    â–¼ Worse than 88% of models

    5.1

    Mark 7.5 is below the typical mark 7.8 of this category, so it cannot lift the score above the technical score

    80%

    7.3

    Average grade

    20%

    8.3

    Popularity

    Grades by review (18)
    13 reviews: 11 with a printed score, 2 estimated from the review. 5 video reviews, each counting half as much as a written test. Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
    User ratings collected online are not part of this score.
    5.1 vs 7.0
  • 6.5% worse value for money
    Motorola Xoom 2 MZ615 (1GB + 16GB) has worse value for money than the average tablet (7.09 vs 7.6).
    7.09 vs 7.55
  • 6 fewer CPU threads
    This tablet has fewer CPU threads than the average tablet (2 vs 8). The average tablet has 8 CPU threads.
    2 vs 8
  • 3 GB less RAM
    This tablet has less RAM than the average tablet (1 GB vs 4 GB). The average tablet has 4 GB of RAM.
    1 GB vs 4 GB
  • 40% lower CPU speed
    This tablet has a lower CPU speed than the average tablet (1.2 GHz vs 2 GHz). The average tablet has CPU speed of 2 GHz.
    1.2 GHz vs 2 GHz
  • 3.21x larger process node
    This tablet has a larger process node than the average tablet (45 nm vs 14 nm). The average tablet is built on 14 nm.
    45 nm vs 14 nm
  • More basic graphics
    This tablet has less advanced graphics than the average tablet (PowerVR SGX540 vs Mali-G51).
    PowerVR SGX540 vs Mali-G51
  • 75% less internal storage
    This tablet has less internal storage than the average tablet (16 GB vs 64 GB). The average tablet has 64 GB of internal storage.
    16 GB vs 64 GB
  • No big.LITTLE architecture
    This tablet does not support big.LITTLE architecture, while the average tablet does. 51.7% of tablets support big.LITTLE architecture.
  • 57% less memory bandwidth
    This tablet has less memory bandwidth than the average tablet (6.4 GB/s vs 14.9 GB/s). The average tablet has 14.9 GB/s of memory bandwidth.
    6.4 GB/s vs 14.9 GB/s
  • 8 years older
    This tablet was released earlier than the average tablet (2011 vs 2019). The average tablet was released in 2019.
    December 2011
    2011 vs 2019
  • More basic memory type
    This tablet uses less advanced memory than the average tablet (LPDDR2 vs LPDDR3).
    LPDDR2 vs LPDDR3
  • 16.9% slower GPU clock
    This tablet runs its GPU slower than the average tablet (540 MHz vs 650 MHz). The average tablet runs its GPU at 650 MHz.
    540 MHz vs 650 MHz
  • 32.6% softer screen detail
    This tablet has softer screen detail than the average tablet (149 ppi vs 221 ppi). The average tablet has a pixel density of 221 ppi.
    149 ppi vs 221 ppi
  • Less sharp display
    This tablet has a less sharp screen than the average tablet (1280×800 vs 1920×1200).
    1,280×800 vs 1,920×1,200
  • Less vivid contrast
    This tablet has less contrast than the average tablet (800:1 vs 1015:1). The average tablet has a contrast ratio of 1015:1.
    800:1 vs 1,015:1
  • Less durable glass
    This tablet has less durable glass than the average tablet (Chemically Strengthened Glass vs Corning Gorilla Glass). The average tablet uses Corning Gorilla Glass.
    Chemically Strengthened Glass vs Corning Gorilla Glass
  • 50% slower touch response
    This tablet samples touch more slowly than the average tablet (60 Hz vs 120 Hz). The average tablet samples touch at 120 Hz.
    60 Hz vs 120 Hz
  • 1 nits dimmer screen
    This tablet is dimmer than the average tablet (400 nits vs 401 nits). The average tablet reaches 401 nits.
    400 nits vs 401 nits
  • 3.7 MP lower front resolution
    This tablet has a lower-resolution front camera than the average tablet (1.3 MP vs 5 MP). The average tablet has a front camera of 5 MP.
    1.3 MP vs 5 MP
  • No continuous video AF
    This tablet does not support continuous video AF, the average tablet does. 57.7% of tablets support continuous video autofocus.
  • Worse main-camera video
    This tablet supports worse main-camera video recording than the average tablet (720x30 fps vs 1080x30 fps). The average tablet supports 1080x30 fps main-camera video recording.
    720x30 fps vs 1080x30 fps
  • 3 MP lower rear resolution
    This tablet has a lower-resolution rear camera than the average tablet (5 MP vs 8 MP). The average tablet has a rear camera of 8 MP.
    5 MP vs 8 MP
  • No manual exposure control
    This tablet does not support manual exposure, while the average tablet does. 63.6% of tablets support manual exposure.
  • No HDR photo mode
    This tablet does not have HDR photo mode, the average tablet does. 79.8% of tablets support HDR photo mode.
  • No burst mode
    This tablet does not support burst mode, the average tablet does. 60.6% of tablets support burst mode.
  • No panorama mode
    This tablet does not support panorama mode, while the average tablet does. 78.6% of tablets support panorama mode.
  • No backside-illuminated sensor
    This tablet does not have a BSI sensor, while the average tablet does. 52.6% of tablets have a BSI sensor.
  • No fast charging
    This tablet does not support fast charging, while the average tablet does. 56.8% of tablets support fast charging.
  • 44.4% slower charging
    This tablet charges slower than the average tablet (10 W vs 18 W). The average tablet charges at 18 W.
    10 W vs 18 W
  • No USB-C port
    This tablet does not have a USB Type-C port, while the average tablet does. 54% of tablets have one.
  • Older Bluetooth version
    This tablet has an older Bluetooth version than the average tablet (2.1 vs 5).
    2.1 vs 5
  • Older Wi-Fi standard
    This tablet has an older Wi-Fi standard than the average tablet (Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n) vs Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac)).
    Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n) vs Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac)
  • No face recognition
    This tablet does not have face recognition, the average tablet does. 56.4% of tablets support face recognition.
  • Shorter update support
    This tablet offers shorter update support than the average tablet (short vs medium). The average tablet gets medium of update support.
    short vs medium
  • No split-screen
    This tablet does not support split-screen, the average tablet does. 72.8% of tablets support split-screen.
  • No picture-in-picture mode
    This tablet does not support picture-in-picture, the average tablet does. 61.4% of tablets support picture-in-picture.
  • No camera and mic privacy
    This tablet does not support camera and mic privacy, while the average tablet does. 56.6% of tablets offer this.
  • No multi-user mode
    User score
    8.0/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    Average of independent expert reviews and videos, graded by us; missing reviews count as 7/10.
    When it matters
    When you want to know how independent test sites and video reviewers rate the product in real use.
    Score distribution
    â–¼
    â–¼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    Motorola Xoom 2 MZ615
    the average tablet
    Motorola Xoom 2 MZ615 (1GB + 16GB) does not support multi-user mode, while the average tablet does. 73.8% of tablets offer this.
  • No location privacy
    This tablet does not support location privacy, while the average tablet does. 76.7% of tablets offer this.
  • No dark mode
    This tablet does not support dark mode, while the average tablet does. 57.7% of tablets offer this.
  • 22.2% heavier
    This tablet is heavier than the average tablet (599 g vs 490 g). The average tablet weighs 490 g.
    599 g vs 490 g
  • 78.6 mm wider
    This tablet is wider than the average tablet (253.9 mm vs 175.3 mm). The average tablet is 175.3 mm wide.
    253.9 mm vs 175.3 mm
  • 0.8 mm thicker
    This tablet is thicker than the average tablet (8.8 mm vs 8 mm). The average tablet is 8 mm thick.
    8.8 mm vs 8 mm

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

4.0
GadgetFirst
≈ estimated
13/11/2012
Hands-on review · browser, apps and iPad comparison
Verdict
Motorola Xoom 2 MZ615 is a disappointing tablet with no killer feature, and better rivals exist at similar prices.
6.0
Gear65.com
≈ estimated
10/06/2012
Hands-on review · design, ports and software
Verdict
Motorola Xoom 2 MZ615 is thin and well built with handy USB charging, but a stiff power button and stock-only apps hold it back.
9.0
Geekanoids
≈ estimated
19/12/2011
Full review · speakers, apps and games tests
Verdict
Motorola Xoom 2 MZ615 is a very good alternative to the iPad that deserves a place on your shortlist.
8.0
comedyrollout
≈ estimated
16/12/2011
Hands-on review · build, camera, stylus and software
Verdict
Motorola Xoom 2 MZ615 improves on the original in almost every way, with a few drawbacks.
8.0
Stuff
≈ estimated
14/12/2011
Short video review · first impressions and browser tests
Verdict
Motorola Xoom 2 MZ615 is a thin, fast, well-built Android tablet and a solid choice, but faces tough competition from rivals.
Overview video

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

6.0
itpro.com
✓ explicit
25/01/2012
Lab test · Android tablet
Verdict
The Motorola Xoom 2 is a stylish, quick Android tablet with long battery life, but it's priced too close to the more capable iPad 2.
10
expertreviews.co.uk
✓ explicit
13/12/2011
Hands-on test · Performance tests
Verdict
The Motorola Xoom 2 is the best Android tablet on sale now, with a bright, sturdy build, but buyers may wait for the Android 4.0 update.
7.0
techradar.com
✓ explicit
07/12/2011
Full review · Design and screen
Verdict
The Motorola Xoom 2 is thin, light and crisp, with good battery life, but it isn't as good as its rivals and still runs older Android software.
5.0
eurogamer.net
≈ estimated
13/02/2012
Full review · Screen and gaming
Verdict
The Motorola Xoom 2 has a much better screen and a lighter body than its predecessor, but old Android 3.2 software and a modest chip leave it behind rivals.
7.0
trustedreviews.com
✓ explicit
07/12/2011
Review · Design and connectivity
Verdict
The Motorola Xoom 2 is slim, well built and a handy universal remote, but its lack of memory expansion and modest design changes hold it back.
6.0
itpro.com
✓ explicit
25/01/2012
Review · Design and Android updates
Verdict
The Motorola Xoom 2 is one of the best Android tablets, stylish, well made and fast, though some hardware changes over the original don't add up.
6.0
t3.com
✓ explicit
17/03/2012
Review · Design and web browsing
Verdict
The Motorola Xoom 2 is slimmer and better looking than its predecessor, with a strong browser, but old software and sluggish rotation keep it behind rivals.
8.0
pocket-lint.com
✓ explicit
16/04/2013
Hands-on review · Android tablet
Verdict
The Motorola Xoom 2 is a well-built, snappy Android tablet whose missing microSD slot and some missing apps keep it from standing out.
7.0
connect.de
✓ explicit
13/04/2012
Lab test · Battery and handling
Verdict
The Motorola Xoom 2 is currently the best Android tablet, light and smooth to use, though its battery lasts only about five and a half hours.
7.1
pcwelt.de
✓ explicit
19/04/2012
Lab test · Speed and battery
Verdict
The Motorola Xoom 2 is thin, sturdy and well equipped, with a bright screen, but weak battery life and stuttering menus keep it below the top Android tablets.
7.4
computerbild.de
✓ explicit
06/06/2012
Lab test · Display and connections
Verdict
The Motorola Xoom 2 is a good, solid tablet with plenty of ports and a light build, but its battery and screen sharpness trail the new iPad.
8.0
connect-professional.de
≈ estimated
01/02/2012
Hands-on test · First impressions
Verdict
The Motorola Xoom 2 offers a good screen, fast processor and handy infrared remote, though its Android 4 update is still only promised.
8.6
notebookcheck.com
✓ explicit
03/04/2012
Lab test · Benchmarks and battery
Verdict
The Motorola Xoom 2 is a good buy with a bright screen and flawless build, but it barely outpaces the original and its battery life falls short.

Third-party reviews

What customers like about Motorola Xoom 2 MZ615 (1GB + 16GB)

  • Improved design that is significantly lighter and slimmer than the original Xoom
  • High-quality 10.1-inch IPS display offering excellent viewing angles and color reproduction
  • Splash-proof coating provides protection against minor liquid spills and rain
  • Robust internal storage and stable overall hardware build
  • MotoCast software allows for useful streaming of media from a connected PC

What customers don't like about Motorola Xoom 2 MZ615 (1GB + 16GB)

  • Frequent sluggishness and lag during web browsing and multitasking
  • Lacks 4G connectivity, limited to Wi-Fi and 3G
  • Does not support native voice calls or SMS over the 3G connection
  • The screen is a 'dirt and grease magnet' due to the lack of an oleophobic coating
  • Power and volume buttons are placed in close proximity, making them hard to distinguish by touch
  • Launched with an outdated version of Android (Honeycomb) compared to newer competitors

Verdict

The Motorola XOOM 2 MZ615 is a 10.1-inch tablet featuring a 1280 x 800 HD-IPS LCD display protected by Corning Gorilla Glass and powered by a 1.2 GHz dual-core TI OMAP 4430 processor. Equipped with 1GB of RAM and 16GB of internal storage, it offers a refined, splash-resistant design that is significantly thinner (8.8mm) and lighter (599g) than its predecessor. Key characteristics include a 5MP rear camera with LED flash capable of 720p video, a 1.3MP front camera, and a 7000 mAh battery. Main pros highlighted by reviewers are its premium build quality with rubberised edges for better grip, the inclusion of a mini-HDMI port, and the useful MotoCast software for media streaming. However, common cons include a lack of expandable storage via microSD on the retail model, a highly reflective screen, and software that can sometimes feel sluggish or dated compared to more modern rivals.

Compare Motorola Xoom 2 MZ615 (1GB + 16GB) with other tablets

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Motorola Xoom 2 MZ615 (1GB + 16GB) and other tablets

No results found