Scored using Tablets Methodology v1.0
Tablets Methodology v1.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontum Tablets Methodology v1.0: technical specifications plus authentic consumer ratings, with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Tablets Methodology v1.0

Microsoft Surface Go LTE (8GB + 256GB) Review | 168 Data compared

Avg. price:~£690RAM capacity:8 GBInternal storage:256 GBScreen size:10 inchesChipset:Intel Pentium Gold 4415Y

Microsoft Surface Go LTE (8GB + 256GB) Review: Compare 168 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Tablets category and whether it is worth buying.

Microsoft Surface Go LTE (8GB + 256GB)
6.6/10

Overall score

Score
6.6/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the smartphone's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best Tablets on the market.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

90%

6.5

Technical score

10%

7.6

User score

â–²Better than 59% of tablets
6.7

Value for money

Value for money
6.7/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the smartphone's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a smartphone with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

6.6

Overall score

30%

6.9

Price

â–¼Worse than 67%
6.5

Technical score

Technical score
6.5/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of the smartphone's technical performance, covering eight key areas: performance & hardware, software, camera, connectivity, display, battery, audio, and design.
When it matters
When you want to compare Tablets based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

22%

6.6

Performance

20%

5.0

Display

16%

6.9

Camera

14%

5.6

Battery

12%

8.0

Connectivity

8%

8.4

Software & Features

5%

6.5

Design

3%

5.5

Audio & Multimedia

â–²Better than 59%
7.6

User score

User score
7.6/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the smartphone
When it matters
When you want to know how a smartphone handles daily tasks and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

8.3

User ratings

30%

5.8

Number of reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
â–¼Worse than 73%
  • microsoft-surface-go-8gb-256gb-lte
  • microsoft-surface-go-8gb-256gb-lte
  • microsoft-surface-go-8gb-256gb-lte
microsoft-surface-go-8gb-256gb-lte
microsoft-surface-go-8gb-256gb-lte
microsoft-surface-go-8gb-256gb-lte
Where to buy
*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
Available versions:
Loading...
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of tablet Microsoft Surface Go LTE (8GB + 256GB)

Technical score
Technical score
6.5/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of the smartphone's technical performance, covering eight key areas: performance & hardware, software, camera, connectivity, display, battery, audio, and design.
When it matters
When you want to compare Tablets based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

22%

6.6

Performance

20%

5.0

Display

16%

6.9

Camera

14%

5.6

Battery

12%

8.0

Connectivity

8%

8.4

Software & Features

5%

6.5

Design

3%

5.5

Audio & Multimedia

6.5
User score
User score
7.6/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the smartphone
When it matters
When you want to know how a smartphone handles daily tasks and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

8.3

User ratings

30%

5.8

Number of reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
7.6
Popularity
Popularity
5.8/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the smartphone.
When it matters
When you prefer to purchase a product chosen and reviewed by many other consumers.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Popularity:
Microsoft Surface Go LTE (8GB + 256GB) has a user popularity of 5.8 points, which is lower than 57% of Tablets.
5.8
Value for money
Value for money
6.7/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the smartphone's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a smartphone with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

70%

6.6

Overall score

30%

6.9

Price

6.7
RAM capacity
8 GB
This tablet has a RAM capacity of 8 GB which is larger than the RAM capacity of 72.3% of tablets and equal to that of 17.8% of tablets.
Process node
14 nm
This tablet is built on a 14 nm process node, which is smaller than the node size used in 45% of tablets and equal to the node used in 8.6% of tablets.
Internal storage
256 GB
This tablet has an internal storage capacity of 256 GB which is larger than the storage of 76.5% of tablets and equal to that of 15.7% of tablets.
Geekbench 6 single-core benchmark score
228 points
This tablet scored 228 points in Geekbench 6 (single-core) which is lower than the score of 91.4% of tablets and equal to the score of 0.1% of tablets.
Chipset
Intel Pentium Gold 4415Y
This tablet uses the Intel Pentium Gold 4415Y chipset, which is less advanced than the chipsets in 56% of tablets and equal to those in 0.1% of tablets.
Show more
Screen resolution
1800×1200
This tablet has a screen resolution of 1800×1200 which is lower than that of 60.8% of tablets and equal to that of 0.1% of tablets.
Refresh rate
60 Hz
This tablet supports a refresh rate of 60 Hz which is equal to that in 73.8% of tablets.
Display type
LCD
This tablet uses a LCD display type. 83% of tablets use this display technology.
Pixel density
217 ppi
This tablet has a pixel density of 217 ppi which is lower than that of 51.9% of tablets and equal to that of 0.2% of tablets.
Display glass type
Corning Gorilla Glass 3
This tablet uses Corning Gorilla Glass 3 display glass which is stronger than that on 80.1% of tablets and equal to that on 11.2% of tablets.
Show more
Optical image stabilization
no
This tablet does not support optical image stabilization. 0.4% of tablets include OIS.
Main camera megapixels
8 MP
This tablet has a main camera resolution of 8 MP which is higher than that of 36.5% of tablets and equal to that of 31.8% of tablets.
Front camera megapixels
5 MP
This tablet has a front camera resolution of 5 MP which is higher than in 48.8% of tablets and equal to that in 19.6% of tablets.
Main camera aperture
f/2.0
This tablet has a main camera aperture of f/2.0 which is wider than that of 57.5% of tablets and equal to that of 24.5% of tablets.
Optical zoom
1xxx
This tablet supports 1xx optical zoom which is higher than in 18.4% of tablets and equal to that in 80.7% of tablets.
Show more
Battery capacity
3,100 mAh
This tablet has a battery capacity of 3,100 mAh which is smaller than the batteries in 96.1% of tablets and equal to those in 0.1% of tablets.
Charging speed
45 W
This tablet supports charging speeds of 45 W which is faster than in 83.8% of tablets and equal to speeds in 6.7% of tablets.
Battery life
8.5 hours
This tablet has a battery life of 8.5 hours, which is shorter than that of 70% of tablets and equal to that of 1.2% of tablets.
local video playback
Wireless charging
no
This tablet does not support wireless charging. 1.5% of tablets support wireless charging.
Fast charging
yes
This tablet supports fast charging. 50.4% of tablets support fast charging.
Show more
LTE support
yes
This tablet supports LTE. 36.8% of tablets include LTE connectivity.
Wi-Fi connectivity
yes
This tablet supports Wi-Fi connectivity. 0.2% of tablets offer Wi-Fi support.
GPS
yes
This tablet supports GPS. 17.3% of tablets include GPS functionality.
5G connectivity
no
This tablet does not support 5G connectivity. 11.1% of tablets support 5G.
NFC
no
This tablet does not support NFC. 10.9% of tablets support NFC.
Show more
Operating system
Windows
This tablet uses the Windows operating system, which is less advanced than the one used by 84.1%.
Update support duration
medium
This tablet offers medium update support, which is longer than the support period of 47.3% of tablets and equal to that of 32.6% of tablets.
Direct OS updates
yes
This tablet receives direct OS updates. 20.3% of tablets receive direct updates.
On-device AI
no
This tablet does not support on-device AI. 28.3% of tablets support this capability.
App tracking protection
yes
This tablet includes app tracking protection. 71.8% of tablets include app tracking protection.
Show more
IP rating
not rated
This tablet has an IP rating of not rated which is lower than that of 16.3% of tablets and equal to that of 83.7% of tablets.
Weight
532 g
This tablet weighs 532 g which is heavier than 62.6% of tablets and equal to the weight of 0.3% of tablets.
Backlit keyboard
yes
This tablet supports a backlit keyboard. 90.3% of tablets support backlit keyboards.
Keyboard accessory
yes
This tablet supports a keyboard accessory. 15.8% of tablets support this option.
Pen latency
21 ms
This tablet has a pen latency of 21 ms, which is higher than that of 76% of tablets and equal to that of 4.9% of tablets.
Show more
Number of microphones
?
aptX Adaptive
no
This tablet does not support aptX Adaptive. 6.9% of tablets offer this codec.
Dolby Atmos support
no
This tablet does not support Dolby Atmos. 31.5% of tablets support Dolby Atmos.
N. of speakers
2
This tablet includes 2 speakers, which is more than in 9.8% of tablets and equal to the number in 60.9% of tablets.
FM radio
no
This tablet does not include an FM radio. 19% of tablets offer FM radio functionality.
Show more

Microsoft Surface Go LTE (8GB + 256GB) vs the average tablet

246810TotalPerformanceDisplayCameraBatteryConnectivitySoftware & FeaturesDesignAudio & Multimedia
  • Faster storage type
    This tablet uses NVMe storage, while the average tablet uses eMMC. Storage technology still varies widely across tablets.
    NVMe vs eMMC
  • 4x more storage
    This tablet has more internal storage than the average tablet (256 GB vs 64 GB). The average tablet provides 64 GB of internal storage.
    256 GB vs 64 GB
  • 2.5x faster charging speed
    This tablet supports faster charging than the average tablet (45 W vs 18 W). The average tablet supports charging speed of 18 W.
    45 W vs 18 W
  • 4 GB more RAM
    This tablet has more RAM capacity than the average tablet (8 GB vs 4 GB). The average tablet has 4 GB of RAM.
    8 GB vs 4 GB
  • Supports DisplayPort over USB-C
    This tablet supports DisplayPort over USB-C, the average tablet does not. 21.5% of tablets support DisplayPort over USB-C.
  • Supports fast charging
    This tablet supports fast charging, the average tablet does not. 49.7% of tablets feature fast charging.
  • Supports eSIM
    This tablet supports eSIM, the average tablet does not. 11.5% of tablets support eSIM.
  • Allows manual shutter speed
    This tablet allows manual shutter speed control, the average tablet does not. 21.9% of tablets offer manual shutter speed control.
  • Faster storage type
    This tablet uses NVMe storage, while the average tablet uses eMMC. Storage technology still varies widely across tablets.
    NVMe vs eMMC
  • 4x more storage
    This tablet has more internal storage than the average tablet (256 GB vs 64 GB). The average tablet provides 64 GB of internal storage.
    256 GB vs 64 GB
  • 4 GB more RAM
    This tablet has more RAM capacity than the average tablet (8 GB vs 4 GB). The average tablet has 4 GB of RAM.
    8 GB vs 4 GB
  • More capable chipset
    This tablet uses the Intel Pentium Gold 4415Y chipset, while the average tablet uses MediaTek MT8169A.
    Intel Pentium Gold 4415Y vs MediaTek MT8169A
  • Supports multithreading
    This tablet supports multithreading, the average tablet does not. 0.00% of tablets support multithreading.
  • 20 more GPU execution units
    This tablet has more GPU execution units than the average tablet (24 vs 4). The average tablet has 4 GPU execution units.
    24 vs 4
  • 2x higher memory bandwidth
    This tablet has a higher memory bandwidth than the average tablet (29.8 GB/s vs 14.9 GB/s). The average tablet has memory bandwidth of 14.9 GB/s.
    29.8 GB/s vs 14.9 GB/s
  • Higher contrast ratio
    This tablet has a higher contrast ratio than the average tablet (1500:1 vs 1015:1). The average tablet contrast ratio is 1015:1.
    1,500:1 vs 1,015:1
  • 4.17x higher touch sampling rate
    This tablet has a higher touch sampling rate than the average tablet (500 Hz vs 120 Hz). The average tablet has touch sampling rate of 120 Hz.
    500 Hz vs 120 Hz
  • Supports HDR10 support
    This tablet supports HDR10, the average tablet does not. 21.8% of tablets are HDR10 compatible.
  • More durable display glass
    This tablet uses better display glass than the average tablet (Corning Gorilla Glass 3 vs Corning Gorilla Glass). Display glass choice still varies across tablets.
    Corning Gorilla Glass 3 vs Corning Gorilla Glass
  • Allows manual shutter speed
    This tablet allows manual shutter speed control, the average tablet does not. 21.9% of tablets offer manual shutter speed control.
  • Wider front camera aperture
    This tablet has a better front camera aperture than the average tablet (f/2 vs f/2.2). The average tablet uses f/2.2 front camera aperture.
    f/2.0 vs f/2.2
  • Wider main camera aperture
    This tablet has a better main camera aperture than the average tablet (f/2 vs f/2.2). The average tablet uses f/2.2 main camera aperture.
    f/2.0 vs f/2.2
  • 2.5x faster charging speed
    This tablet supports faster charging than the average tablet (45 W vs 18 W). The average tablet supports charging speed of 18 W.
    45 W vs 18 W
  • Supports fast charging
    This tablet supports fast charging, the average tablet does not. 49.7% of tablets feature fast charging.
  • Includes battery health monitoring
    This tablet features battery health monitoring, the average tablet does not. 37% of tablets include battery health tools.
  • Supports DisplayPort over USB-C
    This tablet supports DisplayPort over USB-C, the average tablet does not. 21.5% of tablets support DisplayPort over USB-C.
  • Supports eSIM
    This tablet supports eSIM, the average tablet does not. 11.5% of tablets support eSIM.
  • Newer USB version
    This tablet supports a newer USB version than the average tablet (USB 3.2 Gen 1 vs USB 2). The average tablet uses USB USB 2.0.
    USB 3.2 Gen 1 vs USB 2.0
  • Supports live text recognition
    This tablet supports live text recognition, the average tablet does not. 34.9% of tablets can recognize text from images.
  • Includes app tracking protection
    This tablet includes app tracking protection, the average tablet does not. 28.3% of tablets offer app tracking protection.
  • Allows app offloading
    This tablet allows app offloading, the average tablet does not. 26.4% of tablets support app offloading.
  • Supports dynamic theme
    This tablet features dynamic themes, the average tablet does not. 29% of tablets offer dynamic theming.
  • Supports extra dim mode
    This tablet features extra dim mode, the average tablet does not. 35.4% of tablets support extra diming.
  • Suitable for drawing
    This tablet is suitable for drawing, the average tablet is not. 41% of tablets are suitable for drawing.
  • Includes backlit keyboard
    This tablet has a backlit keyboard, the average tablet does not. 9.8% of tablets offer a backlit keyboard.
  • Supports stylus tilt
    This tablet supports stylus tilt, the average tablet does not. 33.6% of tablets support stylus tilt.
  • Designed for kids
    This tablet is suitable for kids, the average tablet is not. 23.7% of tablets are suitable for kids.
  • 52.9% smaller battery capacity
    This tablet has a lower battery capacity than the average tablet (3,100 mAh vs 6,580 mAh). The average tablet battery has capacity of 6,580 mAh.
    3,100 mAh vs 6,580 mAh
  • Less advanced operating system
    This tablet runs on a less advanced operating system than the average tablet (Windows vs Android). Operating system choice shapes app support, updates, and ecosystem features.
    Windows vs Android
  • Inferior display type
    This tablet has an inferior display type compared to the average tablet (LCD vs IPS LCD). 0.00% of tablets use the superior display type.
    LCD vs IPS LCD
  • No HDR photo mode
    This tablet does not have HDR photo mode, the average tablet does. 79.6% of tablets support HDR photo mode.
  • 68.7% lower Geekbench 6 single-core benchmark score
    This tablet achieves a lower Geekbench 6 single-core benchmark score than the average tablet (228 points vs 729 points). The average tablet scores 729 points in Geekbench 6 single-core.
    228 points vs 729 points
  • No manual white balance
    This tablet does not allow manual white balance adjustments, the average tablet does. 51.6% of tablets include white balance controls.
  • 51 nits lower peak brightness
    This tablet has a lower peak brightness than the average tablet (350 nits vs 401 nits). The average tablet reaches 401 nits peak brightness.
    350 nits vs 401 nits
  • 1.5 hours shorter battery life
    This tablet offers shorter battery life than the average tablet (8.5 hours vs 10 hours). The average tablet offers 10 hours of battery life.
    local video playback
    8.5 hours vs 10 hours
  • 2.65x more expensive
    Microsoft Surface Go LTE (8GB + 256GB) is more expensive than the average tablet (£690 vs £260).
    £690 vs £260
  • 5.5% lower user score
    User score
    7.6/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the smartphone
    When it matters
    When you want to know how a smartphone handles daily tasks and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
    Score distribution
    ▼▼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    Microsoft Surface Go LTE
    the average tablet
    Microsoft Surface Go LTE (8GB + 256GB) has a lower user score than the average tablet (7.58 vs 8.000).
    7.58 vs 8
  • 6.6% worse value for money
    Microsoft Surface Go LTE (8GB + 256GB) has worse value for money than the average tablet (6.66 vs 7.1).
    6.66 vs 7.1
  • 68.7% lower Geekbench 6 single-core benchmark score
    This tablet achieves a lower Geekbench 6 single-core benchmark score than the average tablet (228 points vs 729 points). The average tablet scores 729 points in Geekbench 6 single-core.
    228 points vs 729 points
  • 20% lower CPU speed
    This tablet has a lower CPU speed than the average tablet (1.6 GHz vs 2 GHz). The average tablet has CPU speed of 2 GHz.
    1.6 GHz vs 2 GHz
  • 2 fewer CPU threads
    This tablet has less CPU threads than the average tablet (4 vs 6). The average tablet has 6 CPU threads.
    4 vs 6
  • 37.8% lower Geekbench 6 multi-core benchmark score
    This tablet achieves a lower Geekbench 6 multi-core benchmark score than the average tablet (1,176 points vs 1,891 points). The average tablet scores 1,891 points in Geekbench 6 multi-core.
    1,176 points vs 1,891 points
  • No big.LITTLE architecture
    This tablet does not use a big.LITTLE architecture, the average tablet does. 51.3% of tablets use a big.LITTLE architecture.
  • Inferior display type
    This tablet has an inferior display type compared to the average tablet (LCD vs IPS LCD). 0.00% of tablets use the superior display type.
    LCD vs IPS LCD
  • 51 nits lower peak brightness
    This tablet has a lower peak brightness than the average tablet (350 nits vs 401 nits). The average tablet reaches 401 nits peak brightness.
    350 nits vs 401 nits
  • 50 nits lower typical brightness
    This tablet has a lower typical brightness than the average tablet (350 nits vs 400 nits). The average tablet reaches 400 nits typical brightness.
    350 nits vs 400 nits
  • 0.1 inches smaller screen size
    This tablet has a lower screen size than the average tablet (10 inches vs 10.1 inches). The average tablet has screen size of 10.1 inches.
    10 inches vs 10.1 inches
  • Lower screen resolution
    This tablet has a lower screen resolution than the average tablet (1800×1200 vs 1920×1200). The average tablet has a resolution of 1920×1200.
    1800×1200 vs 1920×1200
  • 3.1% lower pixel density
    This tablet has a lower pixel density than the average tablet (217 ppi vs 224 ppi). The average tablet has pixel density of 224 ppi.
    217 ppi vs 224 ppi
  • No HDR photo mode
    This tablet does not have HDR photo mode, the average tablet does. 79.6% of tablets support HDR photo mode.
  • No manual white balance
    This tablet does not allow manual white balance adjustments, the average tablet does. 51.6% of tablets include white balance controls.
  • 52.9% smaller battery capacity
    This tablet has a lower battery capacity than the average tablet (3,100 mAh vs 6,580 mAh). The average tablet battery has capacity of 6,580 mAh.
    3,100 mAh vs 6,580 mAh
  • 1.5 hours shorter battery life
    This tablet offers shorter battery life than the average tablet (8.5 hours vs 10 hours). The average tablet offers 10 hours of battery life.
    local video playback
    8.5 hours vs 10 hours
  • Older Bluetooth version
    This tablet uses an older Bluetooth version than the average tablet (4.1 vs 5). The average tablet uses Bluetooth 5.0.
    4.1 vs 5.0
  • Less advanced operating system
    This tablet runs on a less advanced operating system than the average tablet (Windows vs Android). Operating system choice shapes app support, updates, and ecosystem features.
    Windows vs Android
  • No full-page screenshots
    This tablet does not support full-page screenshots, the average tablet does. 52.5% of tablets support full-page screenshots.
  • 12 ms higher pen latency
    This tablet has higher pen latency than the average tablet (21 ms vs 9 ms). The average tablet has pen latency of 9 ms.
    21 ms vs 9 ms
  • 3 points lower iFixit repairability score
    This tablet has a lower repairability score than the average tablet (1 points vs 4 points). The average tablet repairability score is 4 points.
    1 points vs 4 points
  • 8.6% heavier
    This tablet is heavier than the average tablet (532 g vs 490 g). The average tablet weighs 490 g.
    532 g vs 490 g

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

Not graded yet
Not graded yet
Not graded yet

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

P
pcmag.com
18/01/2019
Summary of the review
W
www2.anandtech.com
17/01/2019
Summary of the review
W
windowscentral.com
22/11/2019
Summary of the review
A
au.pcmag.com
19/01/2019
Summary of the review
U
uk.pcmag.com
18/01/2019
Summary of the review
C
computerbild.de
13/11/2018
Summary of the review
H
heise.de
22/09/2018
Summary of the review
T
technikfaultier.com
13/10/2018
Summary of the review
L
lesnumeriques.com
04/10/2018
Summary of the review
C
cnetfrance.fr
27/08/2018
Summary of the review
Z
zdnet.fr
27/08/2018
Summary of the review
L
leclaireur.fnac.com
10/11/2018
Summary of the review
N
notebookcheck.biz
24/12/2018
Summary of the review
L
leclaireur.fnac.com
01/09/2019
Summary of the review
P
pcmag.com
2019
Summary of the review
F
fwd.nl
07/11/2018
Summary of the review
T
tweakers.net
29/08/2018
Summary of the review
E
expeditieaardbol.nl
02/01/2025
Summary of the review
T
test-aankoop.be
2018
Summary of the review
T
techzine.nl
02/09/2018
Summary of the review

Third-party reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
Reviews last updated: November 2026 · How we calculate this

What customers like about Microsoft Surface Go LTE (8GB + 256GB)

  • Extremely portable 10-inch form factor, ideal for travel and secondary use
  • Premium magnesium build quality with a versatile built-in kickstand
  • Always-on connectivity via reliable and fast LTE modem with wide band support
  • High-quality PixelSense display with sharp resolution and vivid colors
  • Supports full Windows desktop applications rather than just mobile apps
  • Convenient Windows Hello facial recognition for secure login
  • Front-facing speakers and 1080p webcam provide an excellent video calling experience

What customers don't like about Microsoft Surface Go LTE (8GB + 256GB)

  • Poor battery life, often lasting only 4-6 hours in real-world LTE usage
  • High entry price that increases significantly when adding the required Type Cover and Pen
  • Underpowered Intel Pentium Gold processor can struggle with heavy multitasking or 20+ browser tabs
  • Cramped keyboard and screen size may be uncomfortable for long typing sessions
  • Large bezels around the display make the device feel slightly dated or frumpy
  • Slow performance on the base model due to slower eMMC storage and limited 4GB RAM
  • Lack of eSIM support on the original LTE model requires a physical SIM card

Verdict

The Microsoft Surface Go LTE (8GB RAM, 256GB SSD) is a highly portable 10-inch 2-in-1 tablet featuring a PixelSense Display with 1800 x 1200 resolution and a versatile 165-degree adjustable kickstand. It is powered by an Intel Pentium Gold 4415Y processor and includes a built-in 4G LTE Advanced modem for always-on cellular connectivity, alongside professional features like a Windows Hello facial recognition camera and a magnesium alloy chassis. Main advantages include its ultra-lightweight design (starting at 1.17 lbs), support for precision inking with the Surface Pen, and the inclusion of a fast SSD and more memory compared to base models. However, users may encounter significant performance limitations under heavy multitasking, a cramped keyboard experience if using the optional Type Cover, and relatively short battery life when active cellular data is in use.

Compare Microsoft Surface Go LTE (8GB + 256GB) with other tablets

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Microsoft Surface Go LTE (8GB + 256GB) and other tablets

No results found