OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS
Scored using Tablets Methodology v3.0
Tablets Methodology v3.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontum Tablets Methodology v3.0: the technical score from the specifications is the base, and independent expert and video reviews (up to ±0.5 points), owner opinions (up to ±0.3) and best-of lists (up to +0.3) move it up or down.
Explore Tablets Methodology v3.0

LG G Pad 8.3 WiFi GPE (2GB + 16GB) review: 168 specs compared

Avg. price:~£280RAM capacity:2 GBInternal storage:16 GBScreen size:8.3 inchesChipset:Qualcomm Snapdragon 600

LG G Pad 8.3 WiFi GPE (2GB + 16GB) Review: Compare 168 technical specifications and 14 expert and video reviews to see how this product ranks in the Tablets category and whether it is worth buying.

LG G Pad 8.3 WiFi GPE (2GB + 16GB)
6.8/10

Overall score

Score
6.8/ 10
✕
What it is
Our main score for this model, 1–10. It combines specs, best-of lists, expert reviews and owners.
How we count it
Parts: Technical score 35%, List score 30%, Reviews score 25%, Sentiment score 10%
Marks: Each part gets a mark out of 10. For reviews, lists and owners, a typical model in this category gets about 8 and the best one gets 10.
No data yet: A part with no data shows "?". It counts as the mark of a weaker model in this category (4 in 5 models with data score higher). This way, models with reviews, lists and owners usually come out ahead.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 57% of models
Score components

35%

5.3

Technical score

30%

?

List scoreNot enough data yet, so we use 7.5, the mark of a weaker model in this category

25%

8.2

Reviews score

10%

?

Sentiment scoreNot enough data yet, so we use 6.9, the mark of a weaker model in this category

â–¼Worse than 57% of tablets
7.5

Value for money

Value for money
7.5/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the tablet's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a tablet with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 57% of models
Score components

70%

6.8

Overall score

30%

9.0

Price

â–¼Worse than 57%
5.3

Technical score

Technical score
5.3/ 10
✕
What it is
How good the specs are compared with the other models in this category, 1–10.
How we count it
Areas: We rate the specs in each area against the other models in this category.
Weighting: The areas that matter most to buyers count more. The shares are shown under Score components.
Share: The technical score is 35% of the overall score.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 79% of models
Score components

22%

5.2

Performance

20%

4.9

Display

16%

6.0

Camera

14%

3.4

Battery

12%

5.8

Connectivity

8%

6.8

Software

5%

6.1

Design

3%

4.8

Audio

â–¼Worse than 79%
8.2

Reviews score

Reviews score
8.2/ 10
✕
What it is
Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
How we count it
Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves. Big test sites count more, short reviews half as much as full tests. A video review counts half.
Score: The average grade is 80% of the review mark; the number of reviews is the other 20% (1 review = 5, the typical number in this category = 8, the most-reviewed model = 10).
Enough data: With few reviews, the average grade is pulled toward the typical grade of this category. No reviews yet: 7.4 for now.
Share: Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 74% of models

80%

8.2

Average grade

20%

8.1

Popularity

Grades by review (14)
14 video reviews, each counting half as much as a written test. Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
User ratings collected online are not part of this score.
â–²Better than 74%
?

List score

List score
7.5/ 10
✕
What it is
How often independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers put this model in their best-of lists for this category.
How we count it
Points: The model in the most lists of this category gets 10; the others get 8 to 10 in proportion. In no list yet: 7.5. Lists count 30% of the overall score.
Enough data: Every list counts, even a single one. With fewer than 5 best-of lists in the category, this part is left out.
Lists with this model (0)
Not in any best-of list yet, so this part counts as 7.5. Models in a list get 8 to 10.
Not in any best-of list yet
  • lg-g-pad-8-3-2gb-16gb-wifi-gpe
lg-g-pad-8-3-2gb-16gb-wifi-gpe
Where to buy
    N/A~ £280
Best rankings
Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.

What reviewers say about the LG G Pad 8.3 WiFi GPE (2GB + 16GB)

Based on 0 · 14

Reviewers praise the smooth performance and solid build, but agree the camera is weak and value for money falls short.
Praised
Mixed views
Criticised
Pick a topic to see who said what
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of tablet LG G Pad 8.3 WiFi GPE (2GB + 16GB)

Technical score
Technical score
5.3/ 10
✕
What it is
How good the specs are compared with the other models in this category, 1–10.
How we count it
Areas: We rate the specs in each area against the other models in this category.
Weighting: The areas that matter most to buyers count more. The shares are shown under Score components.
Share: The technical score is 35% of the overall score.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 79% of models
Score components:

22%

5.2

Performance

20%

4.9

Display

16%

6.0

Camera

14%

3.4

Battery

12%

5.8

Connectivity

8%

6.8

Software

5%

6.1

Design

3%

4.8

Audio

5.3
Reviews score
8.2
List score
?
Value for money
Value for money
7.5/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the tablet's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a tablet with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 57% of models
Score components:

70%

6.8

Overall score

30%

9.0

Price

7.5
RAM capacity
2 GB
Market range: <1 GB – >8 GB
This tablet has 2 GB of RAM, which is less than 61.3% of tablets and equal to 15.5% of tablets.
Process node
28 nm
Market range: <4 nm – >40 nm
This tablet is built on a 28 nm process, which is larger than 65.1% of tablets and equal to 17.6% of tablets.
Internal storage
16 GB
Market range: <16 GB – >256 GB
This tablet has 16 GB of internal storage, which is less than 78.8% of tablets and equal to 14.8% of tablets.
Geekbench 6 single-core score
?
Chipset
Qualcomm Snapdragon 600
This tablet runs on Qualcomm Snapdragon 600, which is more advanced than 56.1% of tablets and equal to 0.2% of tablets.
Show more
What reviewers say
Screen resolution
1920×1200
This tablet has a 1920×1200 screen, which is sharper than 39.1% of tablets and equal to 18.8% of tablets.
Refresh rate
60 Hz
Market range: <60 Hz – >120 Hz
This tablet has a 60 Hz screen, which is smoother than 0.1% of tablets and equal to 73.4% of tablets.
Display type
IPS LCD
This tablet uses a IPS LCD display type. 17% of tablets use this display technology.
Pixel density
273 ppi
Market range: <149 ppi – >291 ppi
This tablet has a pixel density of 273 ppi, which is higher than 79.4% of tablets and equal to 0.9% of tablets.
Display glass type
Corning Gorilla Glass 2
This tablet protects its screen with Corning Gorilla Glass 2, which is more durable than 78.3% of tablets and the same as 1.9% of tablets.
Show more
What reviewers say
Optical image stabilization
no
This tablet does not support optical stabilisation. 0.4% of tablets offer this.
Main camera megapixels
5 MP
Market range: <3.15 MP – >13 MP
This tablet has a rear camera with 5 MP resolution, which is lower than 63.7% of tablets and equal to 26% of tablets.
Front camera megapixels
1.3 MP
Market range: <1.2 MP – >9 MP
This tablet has a front camera with 1.3 MP resolution, which is lower than 80.9% of tablets and equal to 5.4% of tablets.
Main camera aperture
f/2.6
This tablet has a main camera aperture of f/2.6, which is narrower than 87.6% of tablets and equal to 2% of tablets.
Optical zoom
1xxx
This tablet has 1xx optical zoom, which is stronger than 18.2% of tablets and equal to 80.9% of tablets.
Show more
What reviewers say
Battery capacity
4,600 mAh
Market range: <4k mAh – >10.1k mAh
This tablet has 4,600 mAh battery capacity, which is smaller than 77.3% of tablets and equal to 0.6% of tablets.
Charging speed
10 W
Market range: <10 W – >45 W
This tablet charges at 10 W, which is slower than 60.9% of tablets and equal to 33.3% of tablets.
Battery life
8 hours
Market range: <7 hours – >16 hours
This tablet has a battery life of 8 hours, which is shorter than that of 72.2% of tablets and equal to that of 11.9% of tablets.
mixed use
Wireless charging
no
This tablet does not support wireless charging. 1.5% of tablets offer this.
Fast charging
no
This tablet does not support fast charging. 56.9% of tablets offer this.
Show more
LTE support
no
This tablet does not have built-in LTE. 42.9% of tablets offer this.
Wi-Fi connectivity
yes
This tablet connects to Wi-Fi. 0.2% of tablets offer this.
GPS
yes
This tablet has built-in GPS. 17.1% of tablets offer this.
5G connectivity
no
This tablet does not support 5G. 8.1% of tablets offer this.
NFC
no
This tablet does not include NFC. 10.8% of tablets offer this.
Show more
What reviewers say
Operating system
Android
This tablet uses the Android operating system, which is more advanced than the one used by 23.2%.
Update support duration
short
This tablet offers short update support, which is shorter than the support period of 52.4% of tablets and equal to that of 47.6% of tablets.
Direct OS updates
yes
This tablet supports direct OS updates. 20.3% of tablets offer this.
On-device AI
no
This tablet does not support on-device AI. 28.3% of tablets support this capability.
App tracking protection
no
This tablet does not support app tracking protection. 28.4% of tablets offer this.
Show more
What reviewers say
IP rating
not rated
This tablet's IP rating is not rated, which is less protected than 16.5% of tablets and the same as 83.6% of tablets.
Weight
338 g
Market range: <315 g – >730 g
This tablet weighs 338 g, which is lighter than 85% of tablets and equal to 0.3% of tablets.
Backlit keyboard
no
This tablet does not support a backlit keyboard. 9.7% of tablets support backlit keyboards.
Keyboard accessory
no
This tablet does not support a keyboard accessory. 84.3% of tablets support this option.
Pen latency
N/A
Show more
What reviewers say
Number of microphones
1
Market range: <1 – >3
This tablet has a microphone array of 1, which is more than 0.2% of tablets and equal to 54.8% of tablets.
aptX Adaptive
no
This tablet does not support aptX Adaptive. 6.9% of tablets offer this.
Dolby Atmos support
no
This tablet does not support Dolby Atmos. 31.3% of tablets support Dolby Atmos.
N. of speakers
2
Market range: <2 – >4
This tablet includes 2 speakers, which is more than in 9.8% of tablets and equal to the number in 60.8% of tablets.
FM radio
no
This tablet does not include an FM radio. 19% of tablets offer this.
Show more
What reviewers say

LG G Pad 8.3 WiFi GPE (2GB + 16GB) vs the average tablet

246810TotalPerformanceDisplayCameraBatteryConnectivitySoftwareDesignAudio
  • More advanced chipset
    This tablet has a more advanced chipset than the average tablet (Qualcomm Snapdragon 600 vs MediaTek MT8169A).
    Qualcomm Snapdragon 600 vs MediaTek MT8169A
  • More advanced graphics
    This tablet has more advanced graphics than the average tablet (Adreno 320 vs Mali-G51).
    Adreno 320 vs Mali-G51
  • 23.5% sharper screen detail
    This tablet has sharper screen detail than the average tablet (273 ppi vs 221 ppi). The average tablet has a pixel density of 221 ppi.
    273 ppi vs 221 ppi
  • 31% lighter
    This tablet is lighter than the average tablet (338 g vs 490 g). The average tablet weighs 490 g.
    338 g vs 490 g
  • Supports manual ISO
    This tablet supports manual ISO, while the average tablet does not. 45.9% of tablets support manual ISO.
  • 17.1% higher review score
    Reviews score
    8.2/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
    How we count it
    Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves. Big test sites count more, short reviews half as much as full tests. A video review counts half.
    Score: The average grade is 80% of the review mark; the number of reviews is the other 20% (1 review = 5, the typical number in this category = 8, the most-reviewed model = 10).
    Enough data: With few reviews, the average grade is pulled toward the typical grade of this category. No reviews yet: 7.4 for now.
    Share: Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
    Score distribution
    â–¼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    â–² Better than 74% of models

    80%

    8.2

    Average grade

    20%

    8.1

    Popularity

    Grades by review (14)
    14 video reviews, each counting half as much as a written test. Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
    User ratings collected online are not part of this score.
    8.2 vs 7.0
  • Supports slow-motion video
    This tablet supports slow-motion recording, while the average tablet does not. 37.3% of tablets support slow-motion recording.
  • More durable glass
    This tablet has more durable glass than the average tablet (Corning Gorilla Glass 2 vs Corning Gorilla Glass). The average tablet uses Corning Gorilla Glass.
    Corning Gorilla Glass 2 vs Corning Gorilla Glass
  • 17.1% higher review score
    Reviews score
    8.2/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
    How we count it
    Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves. Big test sites count more, short reviews half as much as full tests. A video review counts half.
    Score: The average grade is 80% of the review mark; the number of reviews is the other 20% (1 review = 5, the typical number in this category = 8, the most-reviewed model = 10).
    Enough data: With few reviews, the average grade is pulled toward the typical grade of this category. No reviews yet: 7.4 for now.
    Share: Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
    Score distribution
    â–¼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    â–² Better than 74% of models

    80%

    8.2

    Average grade

    20%

    8.1

    Popularity

    Grades by review (14)
    14 video reviews, each counting half as much as a written test. Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
    User ratings collected online are not part of this score.
    8.2 vs 7.0
  • More advanced chipset
    This tablet has a more advanced chipset than the average tablet (Qualcomm Snapdragon 600 vs MediaTek MT8169A).
    Qualcomm Snapdragon 600 vs MediaTek MT8169A
  • More advanced graphics
    This tablet has more advanced graphics than the average tablet (Adreno 320 vs Mali-G51).
    Adreno 320 vs Mali-G51
  • 23.5% sharper screen detail
    This tablet has sharper screen detail than the average tablet (273 ppi vs 221 ppi). The average tablet has a pixel density of 221 ppi.
    273 ppi vs 221 ppi
  • More durable glass
    This tablet has more durable glass than the average tablet (Corning Gorilla Glass 2 vs Corning Gorilla Glass). The average tablet uses Corning Gorilla Glass.
    Corning Gorilla Glass 2 vs Corning Gorilla Glass
  • Supports manual ISO
    This tablet supports manual ISO, while the average tablet does not. 45.9% of tablets support manual ISO.
  • Supports slow-motion video
    This tablet supports slow-motion recording, while the average tablet does not. 37.3% of tablets support slow-motion recording.
  • Supports HDMI output
    This tablet supports HDMI output, while the average tablet does not. 49.8% of tablets offer this.
    via SlimPort adapter
  • 31% lighter
    This tablet is lighter than the average tablet (338 g vs 490 g). The average tablet weighs 490 g.
    338 g vs 490 g
  • 48.8 mm narrower
    This tablet is narrower than the average tablet (126.5 mm vs 175.3 mm). The average tablet is 175.3 mm wide.
    126.5 mm vs 175.3 mm
  • 3.7 MP lower front resolution
    This tablet has a lower-resolution front camera than the average tablet (1.3 MP vs 5 MP). The average tablet has a front camera of 5 MP.
    1.3 MP vs 5 MP
  • No USB-C port
    This tablet does not have a USB Type-C port, while the average tablet does. 54% of tablets have one.
  • 4 fewer CPU threads
    This tablet has fewer CPU threads than the average tablet (4 vs 8). The average tablet has 8 CPU threads.
    4 vs 8
  • Shorter update support
    This tablet offers shorter update support than the average tablet (short vs medium). The average tablet gets medium of update support.
    short vs medium
  • No fast charging
    This tablet does not support fast charging, while the average tablet does. 56.8% of tablets support fast charging.
  • 2 hours shorter battery life
    This tablet offers shorter battery life than the average tablet (8 hours vs 10 hours). The average tablet offers 10 hours of battery life.
    mixed use
    8 hours vs 10 hours
  • 3 MP lower rear resolution
    This tablet has a lower-resolution rear camera than the average tablet (5 MP vs 8 MP). The average tablet has a rear camera of 8 MP.
    5 MP vs 8 MP
  • Older Wi-Fi standard
    This tablet has an older Wi-Fi standard than the average tablet (Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n) vs Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac)).
    Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n) vs Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac)
  • 4 fewer CPU threads
    This tablet has fewer CPU threads than the average tablet (4 vs 8). The average tablet has 8 CPU threads.
    4 vs 8
  • 2 GB less RAM
    This tablet has less RAM than the average tablet (2 GB vs 4 GB). The average tablet has 4 GB of RAM.
    2 GB vs 4 GB
  • 1,333 MHz slower RAM speed
    This tablet has a lower RAM speed than the average tablet (533 MHz vs 1,866 MHz). The average tablet has RAM speed of 1,866 MHz.
    533 MHz vs 1,866 MHz
  • 75% less internal storage
    This tablet has less internal storage than the average tablet (16 GB vs 64 GB). The average tablet has 64 GB of internal storage.
    16 GB vs 64 GB
  • 2x larger process node
    This tablet has a larger process node than the average tablet (28 nm vs 14 nm). The average tablet is built on 14 nm.
    28 nm vs 14 nm
  • No big.LITTLE architecture
    This tablet does not support big.LITTLE architecture, while the average tablet does. 51.7% of tablets support big.LITTLE architecture.
  • 15% lower CPU speed
    This tablet has a lower CPU speed than the average tablet (1.7 GHz vs 2 GHz). The average tablet has CPU speed of 2 GHz.
    1.7 GHz vs 2 GHz
  • 42.8% less memory bandwidth
    This tablet has less memory bandwidth than the average tablet (8.5 GB/s vs 14.9 GB/s). The average tablet has 14.9 GB/s of memory bandwidth.
    8.52 GB/s vs 14.9 GB/s
  • 6 years older
    This tablet was released earlier than the average tablet (2013 vs 2019). The average tablet was released in 2019.
    December 2013
    2013 vs 2019
  • More basic memory type
    This tablet uses less advanced memory than the average tablet (LPDDR2 vs LPDDR3).
    LPDDR2 vs LPDDR3
  • 56 nits dimmer screen
    This tablet is dimmer than the average tablet (345 nits vs 401 nits). The average tablet reaches 401 nits.
    345 nits vs 401 nits
  • 71 nits lower typical brightness
    This tablet has a lower typical brightness than the average tablet (329 nits vs 400 nits). The average tablet reaches 400 nits typical brightness.
    329 nits vs 400 nits
  • 1.8 inches smaller screen
    This tablet has a smaller screen than the average tablet (8.3 inches vs 10.1 inches). The average tablet measures 10.1 inches.
    8.3 inches vs 10.1 inches
  • 3.7 MP lower front resolution
    This tablet has a lower-resolution front camera than the average tablet (1.3 MP vs 5 MP). The average tablet has a front camera of 5 MP.
    1.3 MP vs 5 MP
  • 3 MP lower rear resolution
    This tablet has a lower-resolution rear camera than the average tablet (5 MP vs 8 MP). The average tablet has a rear camera of 8 MP.
    5 MP vs 8 MP
  • Narrower front camera aperture
    This tablet has a narrower front camera aperture than the average tablet (f/2.4 vs f/2.2). The average tablet's front camera aperture is f/2.2.
    f/2.4 vs f/2.2
  • Narrower main camera aperture
    This tablet has a narrower main camera aperture than the average tablet (f/2.6 vs f/2.2). The average tablet's main camera aperture is f/2.2.
    f/2.6 vs f/2.2
  • No timelapse video
    This tablet does not support timelapse video, while the average tablet does. 57.5% of tablets support timelapse video.
  • No fast charging
    This tablet does not support fast charging, while the average tablet does. 56.8% of tablets support fast charging.
  • 2 hours shorter battery life
    This tablet offers shorter battery life than the average tablet (8 hours vs 10 hours). The average tablet offers 10 hours of battery life.
    mixed use
    8 hours vs 10 hours
  • 30.3% smaller battery capacity
    This tablet has a smaller battery capacity than the average tablet (4,600 mAh vs 6,600 mAh). The average tablet offers 6,600 mAh of battery capacity.
    4,600 mAh vs 6,600 mAh
  • 44.4% slower charging
    This tablet charges slower than the average tablet (10 W vs 18 W). The average tablet charges at 18 W.
    10 W vs 18 W
  • No USB-C port
    This tablet does not have a USB Type-C port, while the average tablet does. 54% of tablets have one.
  • Older Wi-Fi standard
    This tablet has an older Wi-Fi standard than the average tablet (Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n) vs Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac)).
    Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n) vs Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac)
  • Older Bluetooth version
    This tablet has an older Bluetooth version than the average tablet (4 vs 5).
    4 vs 5
  • Shorter update support
    This tablet offers shorter update support than the average tablet (short vs medium). The average tablet gets medium of update support.
    short vs medium
  • No camera and mic privacy
    This tablet does not support camera and mic privacy, while the average tablet does. 56.6% of tablets offer this.
  • No full-page screenshots
    This tablet does not support full-page screenshots, the average tablet does. 53% of tablets support full-page screenshots.
  • No location privacy
    This tablet does not support location privacy, while the average tablet does. 76.7% of tablets offer this.
  • No dark mode
    This tablet does not support dark mode, while the average tablet does. 57.7% of tablets offer this.
  • No keyboard accessory
    This tablet does not support a keyboard accessory, the average tablet does. 84.2% of tablets support a keyboard accessory.

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

7.0
FoneArena
≈ estimated
02/03/2014
Hands-on review · performance, screen and software tests
Verdict
LG G Pad 8.3 WiFi GPE is well built but offers little over the Nexus 7, mainly worth it for its bigger screen and build quality.
8.0
techloupe
≈ estimated
27/01/2014
Hands-on test · gaming, browsing and video playback
Verdict
LG G Pad 8.3 WiFi GPE is playable for games, though some rival tablets run smoother with fewer micro-stutters.
9.5
Armando Ferreira
≈ estimated
19/12/2013
Hands-on review · battery, heat and camera tests
Verdict
LG G Pad 8.3 WiFi GPE is named favourite tablet of the year and highly recommended, especially for its size and build.
9.0
Beau HD
≈ estimated
06/02/2014
Hands-on review · several days of use, display and camera tests
Verdict
LG G Pad 8.3 WiFi GPE is a very solid tablet with great battery life, though the camera is only average.
8.0
Android Central
≈ estimated
11/12/2013
First look · unboxing and early hands-on
Verdict
LG G Pad 8.3 WiFi GPE is a solid, well-built tablet the reviewer clearly likes, though the Google edition feels bare.
Hands-on video, no verdict

Third-party reviews

What customers like about LG G Pad 8.3 WiFi GPE (2GB + 16GB)

  • Pure Android experience with a clean, bloatware-free interface
  • Sharp 1920x1200 Full HD display with great viewing angles
  • Premium build quality featuring a sleek aluminum back panel
  • Smooth and zippy performance powered by a quad-core Snapdragon 600 processor
  • Includes a microSD card slot for expandable storage, rare for stock Android devices
  • Ideally sized 8.3-inch screen that offers more real estate than 7-inch tablets while remaining portable

What customers don't like about LG G Pad 8.3 WiFi GPE (2GB + 16GB)

  • Relatively high launch price compared to the Nexus 7
  • Screen brightness is lower than competitors, making it difficult to view in direct sunlight
  • Lacks some useful software features from the original LG-skinned version, such as QPair and Knock-On
  • Audio quality from the rear-facing speakers is often described as tinny or 'muddy'
  • Battery life is average and may not last as long as some rival tablets under heavy use
  • Limited accessory availability due to its niche market position

Verdict

The LG G Pad 8.3 Google Play Edition (V510) is a premium 8.3-inch tablet featuring a sharp 1920 x 1200 IPS display, a 1.7GHz quad-core Qualcomm Snapdragon 600 processor, 2GB of RAM, and 16GB of internal storage. Its main characteristics include a slim, brushed-metal design and a stock Android experience that ensures timely updates without manufacturer bloatware. Key pros are its high-resolution screen, expandable storage via microSD (up to 64GB), and comfortable one-handed portability. Notable cons include its lack of exclusive LG software features like QPair, a rear camera that lacks a flash, and average battery life compared to contemporary rivals.

Compare LG G Pad 8.3 WiFi GPE (2GB + 16GB) with other tablets

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of LG G Pad 8.3 WiFi GPE (2GB + 16GB) and other tablets

No results found