OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS
Scored using Tablets Methodology v3.0
Tablets Methodology v3.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontum Tablets Methodology v3.0: the technical score from the specifications is the base, and independent expert and video reviews (up to ±0.5 points), owner opinions (up to ±0.3) and best-of lists (up to +0.3) move it up or down.
Explore Tablets Methodology v3.0

Lenovo Tab M7 WiFi Cellular (2GB + 32GB) review: 168 specs compared

Avg. price:~£110RAM capacity:2 GBInternal storage:32 GBScreen size:7 inchesChipset:?

Lenovo Tab M7 WiFi Cellular (2GB + 32GB) Review: Compare 168 technical specifications and 12 expert and video reviews to see how this product ranks in the Tablets category and whether it is worth buying.

Lenovo Tab M7 WiFi Cellular (2GB + 32GB)
5.6/10

Overall score

Score
5.6/ 10
✕
What it is
Our main score for this model, 1–10. It combines specs, best-of lists, expert reviews and owners.
How we count it
Parts: Technical score 35%, List score 30%, Reviews score 25%, Sentiment score 10%
Marks: Each part gets a mark out of 10. For reviews, lists and owners, a typical model in this category gets about 8 and the best one gets 10.
No data yet: A part with no data shows "?". It counts as the mark of a weaker model in this category (4 in 5 models with data score higher). This way, models with reviews, lists and owners usually come out ahead.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 96% of models
Score components

35%

4.9

Technical score

30%

?

List scoreNot enough data yet, so we use 7.5, the mark of a weaker model in this category

25%

4.9

Reviews score

10%

4.9

Sentiment score

â–¼Worse than 96% of tablets
6.9

Value for money

Value for money
6.9/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the tablet's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a tablet with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 87% of models
Score components

70%

5.6

Overall score

30%

9.9

Price

â–¼Worse than 87%
4.9

Technical score

Technical score
4.9/ 10
✕
What it is
How good the specs are compared with the other models in this category, 1–10.
How we count it
Areas: We rate the specs in each area against the other models in this category.
Weighting: The areas that matter most to buyers count more. The shares are shown under Score components.
Share: The technical score is 35% of the overall score.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 92% of models
Score components

22%

4.7

Performance

20%

4.0

Display

16%

4.8

Camera

14%

3.5

Battery

12%

6.5

Connectivity

8%

6.8

Software

5%

6.3

Design

3%

3.9

Audio

â–¼Worse than 92%
4.9

Reviews score

Reviews score
4.9/ 10
✕
What it is
Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
How we count it
Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves. Big test sites count more, short reviews half as much as full tests. A video review counts half.
Score: The average grade is 80% of the review mark; the number of reviews is the other 20% (1 review = 5, the typical number in this category = 8, the most-reviewed model = 10).
Enough data: With few reviews, the average grade is pulled toward the typical grade of this category. No reviews yet: 7.4 for now.
Share: Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 93% of models

4.9

Mark 7.0 is below the typical mark 7.8 of this category, so it cannot lift the score above the technical score

80%

6.7

Average grade

20%

7.9

Popularity

Grades by review (12)
7 reviews: 7 with a printed score, 0 estimated from the review. 5 video reviews, each counting half as much as a written test. Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
User ratings collected online are not part of this score.
â–¼Worse than 93%
?

List score

List score
7.5/ 10
✕
What it is
How often independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers put this model in their best-of lists for this category.
How we count it
Points: The model in the most lists of this category gets 10; the others get 8 to 10 in proportion. In no list yet: 7.5. Lists count 30% of the overall score.
Enough data: Every list counts, even a single one. With fewer than 5 best-of lists in the category, this part is left out.
Lists with this model (0)
Not in any best-of list yet, so this part counts as 7.5. Models in a list get 8 to 10.
Not in any best-of list yet
  • lenovo-tab-m7-wifi-cellular-2gb-32gb
lenovo-tab-m7-wifi-cellular-2gb-32gb
Where to buy
    N/A~ £110
Best rankings
Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Available versions:
1GB + 16GBCheck price
Other versions:
2GB + 32GB1GB + 8GB2GB + 16GB

What reviewers say about the Lenovo Tab M7 WiFi Cellular (2GB + 32GB)

Based on 7 · 5

Reviewers praise the responsive touchscreen and handy size, but agree the camera is weak and the screen disappoints.
Praised
Mixed views
Criticised
Pick a topic to see who said what

What owners say about the Lenovo Tab M7 WiFi Cellular (2GB + 32GB)

Based on 136 owners sharing their experience in online comments

26%positive13%mixed61%negative

Owners appreciate its compact size and basic media use, but slow performance and app compatibility often frustrate them.

What owners dislike

  • Owners report frequent lag and freezing, especially with many apps installed, and it can slow down over time.22
  • Games often lag, crash, or close without warning, and some titles like Roblox, PUBG and Free Fire do not run properly.15
  • Some units will not switch on or charge properly, even when new, and do not respond until left charging for a long time.7
  • Some owners report the screen going black, freezing, showing glitches, or no longer responding to touch.7
  • Wi-Fi often fails to connect or drops out, and some owners say the Wi-Fi signal is weak.5
  • Owners say it is only suitable for basic tasks and is too limited for serious use or entertainment.5
  • Owners report low speaker volume and a microphone that does not pick up voice in calls or recordings.4
  • Some units stop working or fail within one to two months of normal use, especially with children.3
  • The screen resolution is only around 720p or lower, so videos look soft and 1024p content does not play well.3

Points mentioned by at least 3 owners, most mentioned first.

Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of tablet Lenovo Tab M7 WiFi Cellular (2GB + 32GB)

Technical score
Technical score
4.9/ 10
✕
What it is
How good the specs are compared with the other models in this category, 1–10.
How we count it
Areas: We rate the specs in each area against the other models in this category.
Weighting: The areas that matter most to buyers count more. The shares are shown under Score components.
Share: The technical score is 35% of the overall score.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 92% of models
Score components:

22%

4.7

Performance

20%

4.0

Display

16%

4.8

Camera

14%

3.5

Battery

12%

6.5

Connectivity

8%

6.8

Software

5%

6.3

Design

3%

3.9

Audio

4.9
Reviews score
4.9
List score
?
Value for money
Value for money
6.9/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the tablet's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a tablet with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 87% of models
Score components:

70%

5.6

Overall score

30%

9.9

Price

6.9
RAM capacity
2 GB
Market range: <1 GB – >8 GB
This tablet has 2 GB of RAM, which is less than 61.3% of tablets and equal to 15.5% of tablets.
Process node
28 nm
Market range: <4 nm – >40 nm
This tablet is built on a 28 nm process, which is larger than 65.1% of tablets and equal to 17.6% of tablets.
Internal storage
32 GB
Market range: <16 GB – >256 GB
This tablet has 32 GB of internal storage, which is less than 60.9% of tablets and equal to 17.9% of tablets.
Geekbench 6 single-core score
?
Chipset
?
Show more
What reviewers say
Screen resolution
1024×600
This tablet has a 1024×600 screen, which is less sharp than 92.8% of tablets and equal to 6.2% of tablets.
Refresh rate
60 Hz
Market range: <60 Hz – >120 Hz
This tablet has a 60 Hz screen, which is smoother than 0.1% of tablets and equal to 73.4% of tablets.
Display type
IPS LCD
This tablet uses a IPS LCD display type. 17% of tablets use this display technology.
Pixel density
170 ppi
Market range: <149 ppi – >291 ppi
This tablet has a pixel density of 170 ppi, which is lower than 76.5% of tablets and equal to 4.7% of tablets.
Display glass type
Tempered Glass
This tablet protects its screen with Tempered Glass, which is less durable than 78% of tablets and the same as 19.6% of tablets.
Show more
What reviewers say
Optical image stabilization
no
This tablet does not support optical stabilisation. 0.4% of tablets offer this.
Main camera megapixels
5 MP
Market range: <3.15 MP – >13 MP
This tablet has a rear camera with 5 MP resolution, which is lower than 63.7% of tablets and equal to 26% of tablets.
Front camera megapixels
2 MP
Market range: <1.2 MP – >9 MP
This tablet has a front camera with 2 MP resolution, which is lower than 53.8% of tablets and equal to 25.5% of tablets.
Main camera aperture
f/2.4
This tablet has a main camera aperture of f/2.4, which is narrower than 70% of tablets and equal to 17.5% of tablets.
Optical zoom
1xxx
This tablet has 1xx optical zoom, which is stronger than 18.2% of tablets and equal to 80.9% of tablets.
Show more
What reviewers say
Battery capacity
3,590 mAh
Market range: <4k mAh – >10.1k mAh
This tablet has 3,590 mAh battery capacity, which is smaller than 92% of tablets and equal to 0.3% of tablets.
Charging speed
10 W
Market range: <10 W – >45 W
This tablet charges at 10 W, which is slower than 60.9% of tablets and equal to 33.3% of tablets.
Battery life
10 hours
Market range: <7 hours – >16 hours
This tablet has a battery life of 10 hours, which is longer than that of 39.1% of tablets and equal to that of 20.5% of tablets.
web browsing
Wireless charging
no
This tablet does not support wireless charging. 1.5% of tablets offer this.
Fast charging
no
This tablet does not support fast charging. 56.9% of tablets offer this.
Show more
What reviewers say
LTE support
yes
This tablet has built-in LTE. 57.1% of tablets offer this.
Wi-Fi connectivity
yes
This tablet connects to Wi-Fi. 0.2% of tablets offer this.
GPS
yes
This tablet has built-in GPS. 17.1% of tablets offer this.
5G connectivity
no
This tablet does not support 5G. 8.1% of tablets offer this.
NFC
no
This tablet does not include NFC. 10.8% of tablets offer this.
Show more
Operating system
Android
This tablet uses the Android operating system, which is more advanced than the one used by 23.2%.
Update support duration
short
This tablet offers short update support, which is shorter than the support period of 52.4% of tablets and equal to that of 47.6% of tablets.
Direct OS updates
yes
This tablet supports direct OS updates. 20.3% of tablets offer this.
On-device AI
no
This tablet does not support on-device AI. 28.3% of tablets support this capability.
App tracking protection
no
This tablet does not support app tracking protection. 28.4% of tablets offer this.
Show more
What reviewers say
IP rating
not rated
This tablet's IP rating is not rated, which is less protected than 16.5% of tablets and the same as 83.6% of tablets.
Weight
236 g
Market range: <315 g – >730 g
This tablet weighs 236 g, which is lighter than 99.3% of tablets and equal to 0.2% of tablets.
Backlit keyboard
no
This tablet does not support a backlit keyboard. 9.7% of tablets support backlit keyboards.
Keyboard accessory
no
This tablet does not support a keyboard accessory. 84.3% of tablets support this option.
Pen latency
N/A
Show more
What reviewers say
Number of microphones
1
Market range: <1 – >3
This tablet has a microphone array of 1, which is more than 0.2% of tablets and equal to 54.8% of tablets.
aptX Adaptive
no
This tablet does not support aptX Adaptive. 6.9% of tablets offer this.
Dolby Atmos support
no
This tablet does not support Dolby Atmos. 31.3% of tablets support Dolby Atmos.
N. of speakers
1
Market range: <2 – >4
This tablet includes 1 speakers, which is fewer than in 90.3% of tablets and equal to the number in 9.6% of tablets.
FM radio
yes
This tablet includes an FM radio. 81.1% of tablets offer this.
Show more

Lenovo Tab M7 WiFi Cellular (2GB + 32GB) vs the average tablet

246810TotalPerformanceDisplayCameraBatteryConnectivitySoftwareDesignAudio
  • 51.8% lighter
    This tablet is lighter than the average tablet (236 g vs 490 g). The average tablet weighs 490 g.
    236 g vs 490 g
  • Supports LTE
    This tablet supports LTE, while the average tablet does not. 42.9% of tablets support LTE.
  • Supports cellular data
    This tablet supports cellular data, while the average tablet does not. 47.4% of tablets offer this.
  • 72.45 mm narrower
    This tablet is narrower than the average tablet (102.9 mm vs 175.3 mm). The average tablet is 175.3 mm wide.
    102.85 mm vs 175.3 mm
  • 2.36x cheaper
    Lenovo Tab M7 WiFi Cellular (2GB + 32GB) is cheaper than the average tablet (£110 vs £260).
    £110 vs £260
  • 2.36x cheaper
    Lenovo Tab M7 WiFi Cellular (2GB + 32GB) is cheaper than the average tablet (£110 vs £260).
    £110 vs £260
  • Supports LTE
    This tablet supports LTE, while the average tablet does not. 42.9% of tablets support LTE.
  • Supports cellular data
    This tablet supports cellular data, while the average tablet does not. 47.4% of tablets offer this.
  • 51.8% lighter
    This tablet is lighter than the average tablet (236 g vs 490 g). The average tablet weighs 490 g.
    236 g vs 490 g
  • 72.45 mm narrower
    This tablet is narrower than the average tablet (102.9 mm vs 175.3 mm). The average tablet is 175.3 mm wide.
    102.85 mm vs 175.3 mm
  • 30.0% lower review score
    Reviews score
    4.9/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
    How we count it
    Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves. Big test sites count more, short reviews half as much as full tests. A video review counts half.
    Score: The average grade is 80% of the review mark; the number of reviews is the other 20% (1 review = 5, the typical number in this category = 8, the most-reviewed model = 10).
    Enough data: With few reviews, the average grade is pulled toward the typical grade of this category. No reviews yet: 7.4 for now.
    Share: Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
    Score distribution
    â–¼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    â–¼ Worse than 93% of models

    4.9

    Mark 7.0 is below the typical mark 7.8 of this category, so it cannot lift the score above the technical score

    80%

    6.7

    Average grade

    20%

    7.9

    Popularity

    Grades by review (12)
    7 reviews: 7 with a printed score, 0 estimated from the review. 5 video reviews, each counting half as much as a written test. Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
    User ratings collected online are not part of this score.
    4.9 vs 7.0
  • No USB-C port
    This tablet does not have a USB Type-C port, while the average tablet does. 54% of tablets have one.
  • 4 fewer CPU threads
    This tablet has fewer CPU threads than the average tablet (4 vs 8). The average tablet has 8 CPU threads.
    4 vs 8
  • Less sharp display
    This tablet has a less sharp screen than the average tablet (1024×600 vs 1920×1200).
    1,024×600 vs 1,920×1,200
  • 45.6% smaller battery capacity
    This tablet has a smaller battery capacity than the average tablet (3,590 mAh vs 6,600 mAh). The average tablet offers 6,600 mAh of battery capacity.
    3,590 mAh vs 6,600 mAh
  • Shorter update support
    This tablet offers shorter update support than the average tablet (short vs medium). The average tablet gets medium of update support.
    short vs medium
  • No fast charging
    This tablet does not support fast charging, while the average tablet does. 56.8% of tablets support fast charging.
  • 3 MP lower front resolution
    This tablet has a lower-resolution front camera than the average tablet (2 MP vs 5 MP). The average tablet has a front camera of 5 MP.
    2 MP vs 5 MP
  • 30.0% lower review score
    Reviews score
    4.9/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
    How we count it
    Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves. Big test sites count more, short reviews half as much as full tests. A video review counts half.
    Score: The average grade is 80% of the review mark; the number of reviews is the other 20% (1 review = 5, the typical number in this category = 8, the most-reviewed model = 10).
    Enough data: With few reviews, the average grade is pulled toward the typical grade of this category. No reviews yet: 7.4 for now.
    Share: Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
    Score distribution
    â–¼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    â–¼ Worse than 93% of models

    4.9

    Mark 7.0 is below the typical mark 7.8 of this category, so it cannot lift the score above the technical score

    80%

    6.7

    Average grade

    20%

    7.9

    Popularity

    Grades by review (12)
    7 reviews: 7 with a printed score, 0 estimated from the review. 5 video reviews, each counting half as much as a written test. Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
    User ratings collected online are not part of this score.
    4.9 vs 7.0
  • 34.7% lower sentiment score
    4.9 vs 7.5
  • 8.8% worse value for money
    Lenovo Tab M7 WiFi Cellular (2GB + 32GB) has worse value for money than the average tablet (6.94 vs 7.6).
    6.94 vs 7.55
  • 4 fewer CPU threads
    This tablet has fewer CPU threads than the average tablet (4 vs 8). The average tablet has 8 CPU threads.
    4 vs 8
  • More basic graphics
    This tablet has less advanced graphics than the average tablet (Mali-T720 MP1 vs Mali-G51).
    Mali-T720 MP1 vs Mali-G51
  • 35% lower CPU speed
    This tablet has a lower CPU speed than the average tablet (1.3 GHz vs 2 GHz). The average tablet has CPU speed of 2 GHz.
    1.3 GHz vs 2 GHz
  • 2 GB less RAM
    This tablet has less RAM than the average tablet (2 GB vs 4 GB). The average tablet has 4 GB of RAM.
    2 GB vs 4 GB
  • 1,200 MHz slower RAM speed
    This tablet has a lower RAM speed than the average tablet (666 MHz vs 1,866 MHz). The average tablet has RAM speed of 1,866 MHz.
    666 MHz vs 1,866 MHz
  • 2x larger process node
    This tablet has a larger process node than the average tablet (28 nm vs 14 nm). The average tablet is built on 14 nm.
    28 nm vs 14 nm
  • 71.4% less memory bandwidth
    This tablet has less memory bandwidth than the average tablet (4.3 GB/s vs 14.9 GB/s). The average tablet has 14.9 GB/s of memory bandwidth.
    4.26 GB/s vs 14.9 GB/s
  • 50% less internal storage
    This tablet has less internal storage than the average tablet (32 GB vs 64 GB). The average tablet has 64 GB of internal storage.
    32 GB vs 64 GB
  • 3 fewer GPU execution units
    This tablet has less GPU execution units than the average tablet (1 vs 4). The average tablet has 4 GPU execution units.
    1 vs 4
  • Less sharp display
    This tablet has a less sharp screen than the average tablet (1024×600 vs 1920×1200).
    1,024×600 vs 1,920×1,200
  • 3.1 inches smaller screen
    This tablet has a smaller screen than the average tablet (7 inches vs 10.1 inches). The average tablet measures 10.1 inches.
    7 inches vs 10.1 inches
  • Less durable glass
    This tablet has less durable glass than the average tablet (Tempered Glass vs Corning Gorilla Glass). The average tablet uses Corning Gorilla Glass.
    Tempered Glass vs Corning Gorilla Glass
  • 23.1% softer screen detail
    This tablet has softer screen detail than the average tablet (170 ppi vs 221 ppi). The average tablet has a pixel density of 221 ppi.
    170 ppi vs 221 ppi
  • 51 nits dimmer screen
    This tablet is dimmer than the average tablet (350 nits vs 401 nits). The average tablet reaches 401 nits.
    350 nits vs 401 nits
  • 50 nits lower typical brightness
    This tablet has a lower typical brightness than the average tablet (350 nits vs 400 nits). The average tablet reaches 400 nits typical brightness.
    350 nits vs 400 nits
  • 3 MP lower front resolution
    This tablet has a lower-resolution front camera than the average tablet (2 MP vs 5 MP). The average tablet has a front camera of 5 MP.
    2 MP vs 5 MP
  • No continuous video AF
    This tablet does not support continuous video AF, the average tablet does. 57.7% of tablets support continuous video autofocus.
  • Worse main-camera video
    This tablet supports worse main-camera video recording than the average tablet (720x30 fps vs 1080x30 fps). The average tablet supports 1080x30 fps main-camera video recording.
    720x30 fps vs 1080x30 fps
  • 3 MP lower rear resolution
    This tablet has a lower-resolution rear camera than the average tablet (5 MP vs 8 MP). The average tablet has a rear camera of 8 MP.
    5 MP vs 8 MP
  • Narrower front camera aperture
    This tablet has a narrower front camera aperture than the average tablet (f/2.4 vs f/2.2). The average tablet's front camera aperture is f/2.2.
    f/2.4 vs f/2.2
  • No tap-to-focus
    This tablet does not support touch autofocus, while the average tablet does. 83% of tablets support touch autofocus.
  • No HDR photo mode
    This tablet does not have HDR photo mode, the average tablet does. 79.8% of tablets support HDR photo mode.
  • No manual white balance
    This tablet does not support manual white balance, while the average tablet does. 51.5% of tablets support manual white balance.
  • No panorama mode
    This tablet does not support panorama mode, while the average tablet does. 78.6% of tablets support panorama mode.
  • No backside-illuminated sensor
    This tablet does not have a BSI sensor, while the average tablet does. 52.6% of tablets have a BSI sensor.
  • No timelapse video
    This tablet does not support timelapse video, while the average tablet does. 57.5% of tablets support timelapse video.
  • Narrower main camera aperture
    This tablet has a narrower main camera aperture than the average tablet (f/2.4 vs f/2.2). The average tablet's main camera aperture is f/2.2.
    f/2.4 vs f/2.2
  • 45.6% smaller battery capacity
    This tablet has a smaller battery capacity than the average tablet (3,590 mAh vs 6,600 mAh). The average tablet offers 6,600 mAh of battery capacity.
    3,590 mAh vs 6,600 mAh
  • No fast charging
    This tablet does not support fast charging, while the average tablet does. 56.8% of tablets support fast charging.
  • 44.4% slower charging
    This tablet charges slower than the average tablet (10 W vs 18 W). The average tablet charges at 18 W.
    10 W vs 18 W
  • No USB-C port
    This tablet does not have a USB Type-C port, while the average tablet does. 54% of tablets have one.
  • Older Wi-Fi standard
    This tablet has an older Wi-Fi standard than the average tablet (Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n) vs Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac)).
    Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n) vs Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac)
  • No Ethernet support
    This tablet does not have Ethernet support, the average tablet does. 76.5% of tablets support Ethernet.
  • Older Bluetooth version
    This tablet has an older Bluetooth version than the average tablet (4.2 vs 5).
    4.2 vs 5
  • Shorter update support
    This tablet offers shorter update support than the average tablet (short vs medium). The average tablet gets medium of update support.
    short vs medium
  • No split-screen
    This tablet does not support split-screen, the average tablet does. 72.8% of tablets support split-screen.
  • No camera and mic privacy
    This tablet does not support camera and mic privacy, while the average tablet does. 56.6% of tablets offer this.
  • No dark mode
    This tablet does not support dark mode, while the average tablet does. 57.7% of tablets offer this.
  • No offline voice recognition
    This tablet does not support offline voice recognition, the average tablet does. 76.4% of tablets support offline voice recognition.
  • No keyboard accessory
    This tablet does not support a keyboard accessory, the average tablet does. 84.2% of tablets support a keyboard accessory.
  • 1 fewer speakers
    This tablet has less speakers than the average tablet (1 vs 2). The average tablet has 2 speakers.
    1 vs 2

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

Not graded yet
Not graded yet
Not graded yet
Not graded yet
Not graded yet
Not graded yet
Not graded yet
Not graded yet

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

7.5
notebookcheck.net
✓ explicit
31/12/2019
Hands-on test · Budget Android tablet
Verdict
Lenovo Tab M7 is a sturdy, light 7-inch Android Go tablet for light everyday tasks, but its cameras, slow Wi-Fi and Netflix limits hold it back.
5.8
test-achats.be
✓ explicit
n/a
Lab test · Budget Android tablet
Verdict
Lenovo Tab M7 is a comfortable, light mini tablet for simple use, but its poor cameras and small 16GB storage hold it back.
7.5
notebookcheck.biz
✓ explicit
01/11/2020
Lab measurements · Budget Android tablet
Verdict
Lenovo Tab M7 is a light, flicker-free tablet with a bright screen, but slow screen response, weak processor and limited colour range hold it back.
5.8
test-achats.be
✓ explicit
Not Dated
Lab test · Budget Android tablet
Verdict
Lenovo Tab M7 is a comfortable, light mini tablet for simple use, but its poor cameras and small 16GB storage hold it back.
5.3
ocu.org
✓ explicit
Not Dated
Lab test · Budget Android tablet
Verdict
Lenovo Tab M7 is a light tablet with long battery life, but its average screen, weak cameras and modest hardware mean better options exist.
5.8
test-aankoop.be
✓ explicit
Onbekend
Lab test · Budget Android tablet
Verdict
Lenovo Tab M7 is a comfortable, light mini tablet for simple use, but its poor cameras and small 16GB storage hold it back.
5.8
test-aankoop.be
✓ explicit
Not Dated
Lab test · Budget Android tablet
Verdict
Lenovo Tab M7 is a comfortable, light mini tablet for simple use, but its poor cameras and small 16GB storage hold it back.

Third-party reviews

What customers like about Lenovo Tab M7 WiFi Cellular (2GB + 32GB)

  • Extremely affordable price point, often cited as a 'steal' for a budget tablet.
  • Highly portable, compact 7-inch design that fits easily in small bags or large pockets.
  • Premium-feeling metal build quality that exceeds expectations for a budget device.
  • Decent battery life for simple tasks like e-book reading and light web browsing.
  • LTE/Cellular connectivity works reliably for calls and on-the-go data in supported models.
  • Includes a dedicated 3.5mm headphone jack and expandable storage via microSD card.

What customers don't like about Lenovo Tab M7 WiFi Cellular (2GB + 32GB)

  • Slow and laggy performance due to an underpowered processor and limited RAM.
  • Low-resolution display (1024x600) with poor viewing angles and coarse text detail.
  • Outdated Micro-USB charging port instead of the more modern USB-C.
  • Inadequate cameras that produce blurry photos and low-quality video.
  • Poor sound quality from the single built-in speaker, lacking bass and clarity.
  • Software limitations, as it often runs 'Android Go Edition' which restricts some standard features like split-screen multitasking.

Verdict

The Lenovo Tab M7 (3rd Gen) is a compact, entry-level 7-inch tablet featuring a 1024 x 600 IPS display and a premium all-metal back cover. This cellular-enabled variant is powered by a quad-core MediaTek MT8766 processor paired with 2GB of LPDDR4 RAM and 32GB of eMMC storage, which is expandable via microSD. Key pros include its highly portable, lightweight design (237g), reliable 4G LTE connectivity for on-the-go use, and a solid 3,750mAh battery that supports up to 10 hours of video playback. However, it is hindered by slow overall performance that struggles with multitasking, a low-resolution screen that may appear pixelated, and the use of an outdated micro-USB port for charging.

Compare Lenovo Tab M7 WiFi Cellular (2GB + 32GB) with other tablets

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Lenovo Tab M7 WiFi Cellular (2GB + 32GB) and other tablets

No results found