OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS
Scored using Tablets Methodology v1.0
Tablets Methodology v1.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are evaluated mathematically under Frontumo Tablets Methodology v1.0 using verified laboratory benchmarks, technical specifications, and authentic consumer ratings with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Tablets Methodology v1.0

Lenovo Tab M10 FHD WiFi (2GB + 16GB) Review | 168 Data compared

Avg. price:~£160RAM capacity:2 GBInternal storage:16 GBScreen size:10.1 inchesChipset:Qualcomm Snapdragon 429

Lenovo Tab M10 FHD WiFi (2GB + 16GB) Review: Compare 168 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Tablets category and whether it is worth buying.

5.8

Overall score

Score
5.8/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the smartphone's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best Tablets on the market.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 64% of models
Score components

90%

5.5

Technical score

10%

8.8

User score

â–¼Worse than 64% of tablets
5.5

Technical score

Technical score
5.5/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of the smartphone's technical performance, covering eight key areas: performance & hardware, software, camera, connectivity, display, battery, audio, and design.
When it matters
When you want to compare Tablets based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 71% of models
Score components

22%

5.1

Performance

20%

4.7

Display

16%

6.3

Camera

14%

3.2

Battery

12%

7.0

Connectivity

8%

7.5

Software & Features

5%

6.2

Design

3%

6.6

Audio & Multimedia

â–¼Worse than 71% of tablets
8.8

User score

User score
8.8/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the smartphone
When it matters
When you want to know how a smartphone handles daily tasks and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 85% of models
Score components

70%

8.5

User ratings

30%

9.3

Number of reviews

No reviews for this version.

Check reviews from other versions.

â–²Better than 85% of tablets
  • No image
No image

Best prices

    N/A~ £160

Best rankings

Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Available versions:
3GB + 32GBCheck price4GB + 64GBCheck price
Other versions:
2GB + 16GB2GB + 32GB
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of tablet Lenovo Tab M10 FHD WiFi (2GB + 16GB)

Technical score
Technical score
5.5/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of the smartphone's technical performance, covering eight key areas: performance & hardware, software, camera, connectivity, display, battery, audio, and design.
When it matters
When you want to compare Tablets based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 71% of models
Score components:

22%

5.1

Performance

20%

4.7

Display

16%

6.3

Camera

14%

3.2

Battery

12%

7.0

Connectivity

8%

7.5

Software & Features

5%

6.2

Design

3%

6.6

Audio & Multimedia

5.5
User score
User score
8.8/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the smartphone
When it matters
When you want to know how a smartphone handles daily tasks and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 85% of models
Score components

70%

8.5

User ratings

30%

9.3

Number of reviews

No reviews for this version.

Check reviews from other versions.

8.8
Popularity
Popularity
9.3/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the smartphone.
When it matters
When you prefer to purchase a product chosen and reviewed by many other consumers.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 87% of models
Popularity:
Lenovo Tab M10 FHD WiFi (2GB + 16GB) has a user popularity of 9.3 points, which is lower than 87.4% of Tablets.
9.3
Value for money
Value for money
7.0/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the smartphone's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a smartphone with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 56% of models
Score components:

60%

5.8

Overall score

40%

9.7

Price

7.0
RAM capacity
2 GB
RAM capacity
2 GB
â–¼ Worse than 61% of models
Market range: <2 GB – >12 GB
This tablet has a RAM capacity of 2 GB which is smaller than the RAM capacity of 60.9% of tablets and equal to that of 15.6% of tablets.
Process node
14 nm
Process node
14 nm
â–¼ Worse than 46% of models
Market range: <4 nm – >40 nm
This tablet is built on a 14 nm process node, which is smaller than the node size used in 45% of tablets and equal to the node used in 8.6% of tablets.
Internal storage
16 GB
Internal storage
16 GB
â–¼ Worse than 79% of models
Market range: <0 GB – >250 GB
This tablet has an internal storage capacity of 16 GB which is smaller than the storage of 78.5% of tablets and equal to that of 15% of tablets.
Geekbench 6 single-core benchmark score
168 points
Geekbench 6 single-core benchmark score
168 points
â–¼ Worse than 96% of models
Market range: <233 points – >2.3k points
This tablet scored 168 points in Geekbench 6 (single-core) which is lower than the score of 95.8% of tablets and equal to the score of 1.2% of tablets.
Chipset
Qualcomm Snapdragon 429
Chipset
Qualcomm Snapdragon 429
â–² Better than 54% of models
This tablet uses the Qualcomm Snapdragon 429 chipset, which is more advanced than the chipsets in 54.1% of tablets and equal to those in 0.3% of tablets.
Show more
Screen resolution
1920×1200
Screen resolution
1920×1200
â–¼ Worse than 42% of models
This tablet has a screen resolution of 1920×1200 which is higher than that of 39.2% of tablets and equal to that of 18.8% of tablets.
Refresh rate
60 Hz
Refresh rate
60 Hz
â–¼ Worse than 26% of models
Market range: <60 Hz – >120 Hz
This tablet supports a refresh rate of 60 Hz which is equal to that in 73.8% of tablets.
Display type
IPS LCD
Display type
IPS LCD
â–² Better than 17% of models
This tablet uses a IPS LCD display type. 17% of tablets use this display technology.
Pixel density
224 ppi
Pixel density
224 ppi
â–² Better than 50% of models
Market range: <149 ppi – >291 ppi
This tablet has a pixel density of 224 ppi which is higher than that of 50% of tablets and equal to that of 11.6% of tablets.
Display glass type
Tempered Glass
Display glass type
Tempered Glass
â–¼ Worse than 78% of models
This tablet uses Tempered Glass display glass which is weaker than that on 78.1% of tablets and equal to that on 19.5% of tablets.
Show more
Optical image stabilization
no
Optical image stabilization
no
Category Benchmark
This tablet does not support optical image stabilization. 0.4% of tablets include OIS.
Main camera megapixels
?
Front camera megapixels
2 MP
Front camera megapixels
2 MP
â–¼ Worse than 54% of models
Market range: <1.2 MP – >9 MP
This tablet has a front camera resolution of 2 MP which is lower than in 53.6% of tablets and equal to that in 25.5% of tablets.
Main camera aperture
f/2.0
Main camera aperture
f/2.0
â–² Better than 58% of models
This tablet has a main camera aperture of f/2.0 which is wider than that of 57.5% of tablets and equal to that of 24.5% of tablets.
Optical zoom
1xxx
Optical zoom
1xx
â–² Better than 18% of models
This tablet supports 1xx optical zoom which is higher than in 18.4% of tablets and equal to that in 80.7% of tablets.
Show more
Battery capacity
4,850 mAh
Battery capacity
4,850 mAh
â–¼ Worse than 73% of models
Market range: <4k mAh – >10.1k mAh
This tablet has a battery capacity of 4,850 mAh which is smaller than the batteries in 72.8% of tablets and equal to those in 1.8% of tablets.
Charging speed
10 W
Charging speed
10 W
â–¼ Worse than 61% of models
Market range: <10 W – >60 W
This tablet supports charging speeds of 10 W which is slower than in 61% of tablets and equal to speeds in 33.2% of tablets.
Battery life
8 hours
Battery life
8 hours
â–¼ Worse than 72% of models
Market range: <6 hours – >16 hours
This tablet has a battery life of 8 hours, which is shorter than that of 72.2% of tablets and equal to that of 11.9% of tablets.
web browsing
Wireless charging
no
Wireless charging
no
â–¼ Worse than 2% of models
This tablet does not support wireless charging. 1.5% of tablets support wireless charging.
Fast charging
no
Fast charging
no
â–¼ Worse than 50% of models
This tablet does not support fast charging. 49.7% of tablets support fast charging.
Show more
LTE support
yes
LTE support
yes
â–² Better than 37% of models
This tablet supports LTE. 36.8% of tablets include LTE connectivity.
Wi-Fi connectivity
yes
Wi-Fi connectivity
yes
Category Benchmark
This tablet supports Wi-Fi connectivity. 0.2% of tablets offer Wi-Fi support.
GPS
yes
GPS
yes
â–² Better than 17% of models
This tablet supports GPS. 17.3% of tablets include GPS functionality.
5G connectivity
no
5G connectivity
no
â–¼ Worse than 11% of models
This tablet does not support 5G connectivity. 11.1% of tablets support 5G.
NFC
no
NFC
no
â–¼ Worse than 11% of models
This tablet does not support NFC. 10.9% of tablets support NFC.
Show more
Operating system
Android
Operating system
Android
â–² Better than 23% of models
This tablet uses the Android operating system, which is more advanced than the one used by 23.3%.
Update support duration
short
Update support duration
short
â–¼ Worse than 53% of models
This tablet offers short update support, which is shorter than the support period of 52.7% of tablets and equal to that of 47.3% of tablets.
Direct OS updates
yes
Direct OS updates
yes
â–² Better than 20% of models
This tablet receives direct OS updates. 20.3% of tablets receive direct updates.
On-device AI
no
On-device AI
no
â–¼ Worse than 28% of models
This tablet does not support on-device AI. 28.3% of tablets support this capability.
App tracking protection
no
App tracking protection
no
â–¼ Worse than 28% of models
This tablet does not include app tracking protection. 28.3% of tablets include app tracking protection.
Show more
IP rating
not rated
IP rating
not rated
â–¼ Worse than 16% of models
This tablet has an IP rating of not rated which is lower than that of 16.3% of tablets and equal to that of 83.7% of tablets.
Weight
480 g
Weight
480 g
â–² Better than 53% of models
Market range: <315 g – >730 g
This tablet weighs 480 g which is lighter than 53.2% of tablets and equal to the weight of 1.7% of tablets.
Backlit keyboard
no
Backlit keyboard
no
â–¼ Worse than 10% of models
This tablet does not support a backlit keyboard. 9.8% of tablets support backlit keyboards.
Keyboard accessory
yes
Keyboard accessory
yes
â–² Better than 16% of models
This tablet supports a keyboard accessory. 15.8% of tablets support this option.
Pen latency
N/A
Show more
Number of microphones
?
aptX Adaptive
no
aptX Adaptive
no
â–¼ Worse than 7% of models
This tablet does not support aptX Adaptive. 6.9% of tablets offer this codec.
Dolby Atmos support
yes
Dolby Atmos support
yes
â–² Better than 69% of models
This tablet supports Dolby Atmos. 68.6% of tablets support Dolby Atmos.
N. of speakers
2
N. of speakers
2
â–¼ Worse than 29% of models
Market range: <1 – >6
This tablet includes 2 speakers, which is more than in 9.8% of tablets and equal to the number in 60.9% of tablets.
FM radio
yes
FM radio
yes
â–² Better than 81% of models
This tablet includes an FM radio. 81.1% of tablets offer FM radio functionality.
Show more

Lenovo Tab M10 FHD WiFi (2GB + 16GB) vs the average tablet

246810TotalPerformanceDisplayCameraBatteryConnectivitySoftware & FeaturesDesignAudio & Multimedia
  • More capable chipset
    Chipset
    Qualcomm Snapdragon 429
    â–² Better than 54% of models
    This tablet uses the Qualcomm Snapdragon 429 chipset, while the average tablet uses MediaTek MT8169A.
    Qualcomm Snapdragon 429 vs MediaTek MT8169A
  • Better GPU
    GPU model
    Adreno 506
    â–² Better than 78% of models
    This tablet uses the Adreno 506 GPU, while the average tablet uses Mali-G51. GPU choice is one of the main performance differences between tablets.
    Adreno 506 vs Mali-G51
  • Allows manual ISO
    Manual ISO
    yes
    â–² Better than 54% of models
    This tablet allows manual ISO adjustment, the average tablet does not. 46% of tablets feature manual ISO.
  • Supports Dolby Atmos
    Dolby Atmos support
    yes
    â–² Better than 69% of models
    This tablet supports Dolby Atmos, the average tablet does not. 31.5% of tablets support Dolby Atmos.
  • 2 more CPU threads
    CPU threads
    8
    â–² Better than 50% of models
    Market range: <2 – >12
    This tablet has more CPU threads than the average tablet (8 vs 6). The average tablet has 6 CPU threads.
    8 vs 6
  • Wider main camera aperture
    Main camera aperture
    f/2.0
    â–² Better than 58% of models
    This tablet has a better main camera aperture than the average tablet (f/2 vs f/2.2). The average tablet uses f/2.2 main camera aperture.
    f/2.0 vs f/2.2
  • Designed for kids
    Designed for kids
    yes
    â–² Better than 76% of models
    This tablet is suitable for kids, the average tablet is not. 23.7% of tablets are suitable for kids.
  • 9.6% higher user score
    User score
    8.8/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the smartphone
    When it matters
    When you want to know how a smartphone handles daily tasks and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
    Score distribution
    â–¼
    â–¼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    Lenovo Tab M10 FHD WiFi
    the average tablet
    Lenovo Tab M10 FHD WiFi (2GB + 16GB) has a higher user score than the average tablet (8.77 vs 8.000).
    8.77 vs 8
  • 9.6% higher user score
    User score
    8.8/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the smartphone
    When it matters
    When you want to know how a smartphone handles daily tasks and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
    Score distribution
    â–¼
    â–¼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    Lenovo Tab M10 FHD WiFi
    the average tablet
    Lenovo Tab M10 FHD WiFi (2GB + 16GB) has a higher user score than the average tablet (8.77 vs 8.000).
    8.77 vs 8
  • 93.1% more popular
    Lenovo Tab M10 FHD WiFi (2GB + 16GB) is more popular than the average tablet (9.29 vs 4.8).
    9.29 vs 4.81
  • More capable chipset
    Chipset
    Qualcomm Snapdragon 429
    â–² Better than 54% of models
    This tablet uses the Qualcomm Snapdragon 429 chipset, while the average tablet uses MediaTek MT8169A.
    Qualcomm Snapdragon 429 vs MediaTek MT8169A
  • Better GPU
    GPU model
    Adreno 506
    â–² Better than 78% of models
    This tablet uses the Adreno 506 GPU, while the average tablet uses Mali-G51. GPU choice is one of the main performance differences between tablets.
    Adreno 506 vs Mali-G51
  • 2 more CPU threads
    CPU threads
    8
    â–² Better than 50% of models
    Market range: <2 – >12
    This tablet has more CPU threads than the average tablet (8 vs 6). The average tablet has 6 CPU threads.
    8 vs 6
  • Allows manual ISO
    Manual ISO
    yes
    â–² Better than 54% of models
    This tablet allows manual ISO adjustment, the average tablet does not. 46% of tablets feature manual ISO.
  • Wider main camera aperture
    Main camera aperture
    f/2.0
    â–² Better than 58% of models
    This tablet has a better main camera aperture than the average tablet (f/2 vs f/2.2). The average tablet uses f/2.2 main camera aperture.
    f/2.0 vs f/2.2
  • Designed for kids
    Designed for kids
    yes
    â–² Better than 76% of models
    This tablet is suitable for kids, the average tablet is not. 23.7% of tablets are suitable for kids.
  • Supports Dolby Atmos
    Dolby Atmos support
    yes
    â–² Better than 69% of models
    This tablet supports Dolby Atmos, the average tablet does not. 31.5% of tablets support Dolby Atmos.
  • Shorter update support
    Update support duration
    short
    â–¼ Worse than 53% of models
    This tablet offers shorter update support than the average tablet (short vs medium). The average tablet gets medium of update support.
    short vs medium
  • 3 MP lower front camera megapixels
    Front camera megapixels
    2 MP
    â–¼ Worse than 54% of models
    Market range: <1.2 MP – >9 MP
    This tablet has less front camera megapixels than the average tablet (2 MP vs 5 MP). The average tablet has 5 MP front camera resolution.
    2 MP vs 5 MP
  • No continuous video AF
    Continuous autofocus in video
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 58% of models
    This tablet does not support continuous video AF, the average tablet does. 57.7% of tablets support continuous video autofocus.
  • 2 hours shorter battery life
    Battery life
    8 hours
    â–¼ Worse than 72% of models
    Market range: <6 hours – >16 hours
    This tablet offers shorter battery life than the average tablet (8 hours vs 10 hours). The average tablet offers 10 hours of battery life.
    web browsing
    8 hours vs 10 hours
  • Less durable display glass
    Display glass type
    Tempered Glass
    â–¼ Worse than 78% of models
    This tablet uses weaker display glass than the average tablet (Tempered Glass vs Corning Gorilla Glass). Display glass choice still varies across tablets.
    Tempered Glass vs Corning Gorilla Glass
  • 81 nits lower peak brightness
    Peak brightness
    320 nits
    â–¼ Worse than 89% of models
    Market range: <320 nits – >750 nits
    This tablet has a lower peak brightness than the average tablet (320 nits vs 401 nits). The average tablet reaches 401 nits peak brightness.
    320 nits vs 401 nits
  • 2 GB less RAM
    RAM capacity
    2 GB
    â–¼ Worse than 61% of models
    Market range: <2 GB – >12 GB
    This tablet has less RAM capacity than the average tablet (2 GB vs 4 GB). The average tablet has 4 GB of RAM.
    2 GB vs 4 GB
  • No touch autofocus
    Touch autofocus
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 83% of models
    This tablet does not support touch autofocus, the average tablet does. 82.8% of tablets allow touch-to-focus.
  • 2 GB less RAM
    RAM capacity
    2 GB
    â–¼ Worse than 61% of models
    Market range: <2 GB – >12 GB
    This tablet has less RAM capacity than the average tablet (2 GB vs 4 GB). The average tablet has 4 GB of RAM.
    2 GB vs 4 GB
  • 77% lower Geekbench 6 single-core benchmark score
    Geekbench 6 single-core benchmark score
    168 points
    â–¼ Worse than 96% of models
    Market range: <233 points – >2.3k points
    This tablet achieves a lower Geekbench 6 single-core benchmark score than the average tablet (168 points vs 729 points). The average tablet scores 729 points in Geekbench 6 single-core.
    168 points vs 729 points
  • 59.7% lower Geekbench 6 multi-core benchmark score
    Geekbench 6 multi-core benchmark score
    762 points
    â–¼ Worse than 87% of models
    Market range: <725 points – >6.8k points
    This tablet achieves a lower Geekbench 6 multi-core benchmark score than the average tablet (762 points vs 1891 points). The average tablet scores 1891 points in Geekbench 6 multi-core.
    762 points vs 1,891 points
  • 75% less storage
    Internal storage
    16 GB
    â–¼ Worse than 79% of models
    Market range: <0 GB – >250 GB
    This tablet has less internal storage than the average tablet (16 GB vs 64 GB). The average tablet provides 64 GB of internal storage.
    16 GB vs 64 GB
  • No big.LITTLE architecture
    big.LITTLE Architecture
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 51% of models
    This tablet does not use a big.LITTLE architecture, the average tablet does. 51.3% of tablets use a big.LITTLE architecture.
  • 49.9% lower memory bandwidth
    Memory bandwidth
    7.46 GB/s
    â–¼ Worse than 74% of models
    Market range: <4.26 GB/s – >60 GB/s
    This tablet has a lower memory bandwidth than the average tablet (7.5 GB/s vs 14.9 GB/s). The average tablet has memory bandwidth of 14.9 GB/s.
    7.46 GB/s vs 14.9 GB/s
  • 10% lower CPU speed
    CPU speed
    1.8 GHz
    â–¼ Worse than 62% of models
    Market range: <1.2 GHz – >3.2 GHz
    This tablet has a lower CPU speed than the average tablet (1.8 GHz vs 2 GHz). The average tablet has CPU speed of 2 GHz.
    1.8 GHz vs 2 GHz
  • 81 nits lower peak brightness
    Peak brightness
    320 nits
    â–¼ Worse than 89% of models
    Market range: <320 nits – >750 nits
    This tablet has a lower peak brightness than the average tablet (320 nits vs 401 nits). The average tablet reaches 401 nits peak brightness.
    320 nits vs 401 nits
  • Less durable display glass
    Display glass type
    Tempered Glass
    â–¼ Worse than 78% of models
    This tablet uses weaker display glass than the average tablet (Tempered Glass vs Corning Gorilla Glass). Display glass choice still varies across tablets.
    Tempered Glass vs Corning Gorilla Glass
  • 80 nits lower typical brightness
    Typical brightness
    320 nits
    â–¼ Worse than 84% of models
    Market range: <300 nits – >600 nits
    This tablet has a lower typical brightness than the average tablet (320 nits vs 400 nits). The average tablet reaches 400 nits typical brightness.
    320 nits vs 400 nits
  • Lower contrast ratio
    Contrast ratio
    1000:1
    â–¼ Worse than 59% of models
    This tablet has a lower contrast ratio than the average tablet (1000:1 vs 1015:1). The average tablet has a contrast ratio of 1015:1.
    1,000:1 vs 1,015:1
  • 3 MP lower front camera megapixels
    Front camera megapixels
    2 MP
    â–¼ Worse than 54% of models
    Market range: <1.2 MP – >9 MP
    This tablet has less front camera megapixels than the average tablet (2 MP vs 5 MP). The average tablet has 5 MP front camera resolution.
    2 MP vs 5 MP
  • No continuous video AF
    Continuous autofocus in video
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 58% of models
    This tablet does not support continuous video AF, the average tablet does. 57.7% of tablets support continuous video autofocus.
  • No touch autofocus
    Touch autofocus
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 83% of models
    This tablet does not support touch autofocus, the average tablet does. 82.8% of tablets allow touch-to-focus.
  • No manual exposure control
    Manual exposure
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 64% of models
    This tablet does not offer manual exposure control, the average tablet does. 63.6% of tablets have manual exposure.
  • No timelapse video
    Timelapse video
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 58% of models
    This tablet does not support timelapse video, the average tablet does. 57.5% of tablets include timelapse modes.
  • 2 hours shorter battery life
    Battery life
    8 hours
    â–¼ Worse than 72% of models
    Market range: <6 hours – >16 hours
    This tablet offers shorter battery life than the average tablet (8 hours vs 10 hours). The average tablet offers 10 hours of battery life.
    web browsing
    8 hours vs 10 hours
  • 26.3% smaller battery capacity
    Battery capacity
    4,850 mAh
    â–¼ Worse than 73% of models
    Market range: <4k mAh – >10.1k mAh
    This tablet has a lower battery capacity than the average tablet (4850 mAh vs 6580 mAh). The average tablet battery has capacity of 6580 mAh.
    4,850 mAh vs 6,580 mAh
  • 44.4% slower charging speed
    Charging speed
    10 W
    â–¼ Worse than 61% of models
    Market range: <10 W – >60 W
    This tablet supports slower charging than the average tablet (10 W vs 18 W). The average tablet supports charging speed of 18 W.
    10 W vs 18 W
  • No cellular module
    Cellular module
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 59% of models
    This tablet does not have a cellular module, the average tablet does. 59.3% of tablets include a cellular module.
  • No HDMI output
    HDMI output
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 50% of models
    This tablet does not have an HDMI output, the average tablet does. 50.1% of tablets support HDMI output.
  • No Ethernet support
    Ethernet support
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 76% of models
    This tablet does not have Ethernet support, the average tablet does. 76.3% of tablets support Ethernet.
  • Older Bluetooth version
    Bluetooth version
    4.2
    â–¼ Worse than 49% of models
    This tablet uses an older Bluetooth version than the average tablet (4.2 vs 5). The average tablet uses Bluetooth 5.0.
    4.2 vs 5.0
  • Shorter update support
    Update support duration
    short
    â–¼ Worse than 53% of models
    This tablet offers shorter update support than the average tablet (short vs medium). The average tablet gets medium of update support.
    short vs medium
  • No dark mode
    Dark mode
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 57% of models
    This tablet does not support dark mode, the average tablet does. 57.2% of tablets have dark mode.
  • No offline voice recognition
    Offline voice recognition
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 76% of models
    This tablet does not support offline voice recognition, the average tablet does. 76.1% of tablets support offline voice recognition.
  • 42 mm taller
    Width
    242.0 mm
    â–² Better than 75% of models
    Market range: <123.8 mm – >274 mm
    This tablet is taller than the average tablet (242 mm vs 200 mm). The average tablet is 200.0 mm tall.
    242.0 mm vs 200.0 mm

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

M
mynexttablet.com
23/04/2020
Summary of the review
Lenovo Tab M10 FHD Plus Review: How Good Is It?
Gearbrain
Gearbrain
08/10/2020
Summary of the review
Review: Lenovo Smart Tab M10 with Google Assistant (2nd Gen)
C
consumerreports.org
Not specified
Summary of the review
Lenovo Tab M10 FHD Plus Tablet Review
T
t3.com
04/07/2022
Summary of the review
Lenovo Tab M10 FHD Plus review: a great tablet for families
R
root-nation.com
25/02/2020
Summary of the review
Lenovo Tab M10 FHD Plus tablet review
N
notebookcheck.net
25/09/2019
Summary of the review
Lenovo Smart Tab M10 TB-X605F - Reviews
X
xda-developers.com
06/12/2023
Summary of the review
Lenovo Tab M10 Plus 3rd Gen review: Not quite what you'd hope
T
tomsguide.com
28/03/2023
Summary of the review
Lenovo Tab M10 Plus Gen 3 review - Tom's Guide
T
trustedreviews.com
19/07/2023
Summary of the review
Lenovo Tab M10 Plus (3rd Gen) - Trusted Reviews
R
root-nation.com
23/02/2023
Summary of the review
Lenovo Tab M10 Plus: review of an affordable tablet for entertainment
H
heise.de
19/05/2021
Summary of the review
Lenovo Smart Tab M10 Plus im Test: Edles Android-Tablet mit Alexa
(Translated)Show original
P
pcwelt.de
17/03/2021
Summary of the review
Test: Lenovo Smart Tab M10 – FHD Plus
(Translated)Show original
C
computerbild.de
10/10/2022
Summary of the review
Lenovo Smart Tab M10 FHD Plus: Die 2. Generation im Test
(Translated)Show original
W
winfuture.de
17/04/2020
Summary of the review
Lenovo Tab M10 FHD Plus getestet: Gutes Tablet, kleine Schwächen
(Translated)Show original
N
notebookcheck.biz
14/07/2022
Summary of the review
Test du Lenovo Tab M10 Plus 2022 (Gen 3) : tablette abordable
(Translated)Show original
L
lesnumeriques.com
28/07/2021
Summary of the review
Test Lenovo Tab M10 FHD Plus : une tablette qui rate le coche
(Translated)Show original
B
bpm-power.com
11/11/2020
Summary of the review
Lenovo Tab M10: L'ideale La Didattica A Distanza
(Translated)Show original
I
it.root-nation.com
25/02/2020
Summary of the review
Lenovo Recensione del tablet Tab M10 FHD Plus
(Translated)Show original
T
tech.everyeye.it
18/06/2022
Summary of the review
Lenovo Tab M10 Plus Gen 3 Recensione: ottimo tablet per l'intrattenimento
(Translated)Show original
S
smartworld.it
06/09/2022
Summary of the review
Recensione Lenovo Tab M10 Plus: fatto per resistere alla famiglia
(Translated)Show original
N
notebookcheck.nl
07/10/2020
Summary of the review
Lenovo Smart Tab M10 FHD Plus Review
(Translated)Show original
A
androidworld.nl
06/07/2022
Summary of the review
Lenovo Tab M10 Plus (Gen 3) review
(Translated)Show original
T
techfi.nl
23/07/2022
Summary of the review
Lenovo Tab M10 Plus Gen 3 (2022) review - Uitstekende budget tablet
(Translated)Show original
E
expert.nl
21/06/2023
Summary of the review
Lenovo Tab M10 Review - Fel scherm met levendige kleuren
(Translated)Show original
N
notebookcheck.nl
29/03/2023
Summary of the review
Lenovo Tab M10 2022 (Gen 3) tablet review - lichtgewicht budget-apparaat met metale
(Translated)Show original

Third-party reviews

What we like about Lenovo Tab M10 FHD WiFi (2GB + 16GB)

  • Premium build quality with a sturdy, aluminum-alloy unibody design.
  • Sharp Full HD (1920 x 1200) IPS display with good colors and viewing angles.
  • Affordable price point offering high value for basic multimedia use.
  • Lightweight and slim profile (approx. 460-465g), making it highly portable.
  • Immersive audio experience from stereo speakers enhanced by Dolby Atmos.
  • Dedicated Kids Mode/Google Kids Space for a safe family-friendly environment.

What we don't like about Lenovo Tab M10 FHD WiFi (2GB + 16GB)

  • Sluggish performance and frequent stuttering, especially during multitasking or heavy apps.
  • Slow charging speeds, often taking 3 to 5 hours for a full charge with the included 10W adapter.
  • Unreliable software updates, often limited to only one major OS upgrade.
  • Inability to stream Netflix in HD due to Widevine L3 limitations in some models.
  • Middling camera quality that produces unremarkable images, especially in low light.
  • Pre-installed bloatware and games that can be intrusive until removed.

Verdict

The Lenovo Tab M10 (TB-X605F) is a budget-friendly 10.1-inch tablet featuring a 1920 x 1200 Full HD IPS display, a Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 octa-core processor, 2GB of RAM, and 16GB of expandable eMMC storage. Main pros include its surprisingly premium slim metal design, dual front-facing speakers with Dolby Atmos for immersive audio, and a dedicated Kids Mode for family-safe content. However, cons include lackluster performance due to the limited 2GB of memory, which can lead to lag during multitasking, and relatively modest battery life from its 4850mAh cell compared to more modern competitors.

Compare Lenovo Tab M10 FHD WiFi (2GB + 16GB) with other tablets

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Lenovo Tab M10 FHD WiFi (2GB + 16GB) and other tablets

No results found