OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS
Scored using Tablets Methodology v3.0
Tablets Methodology v3.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontum Tablets Methodology v3.0: the technical score from the specifications is the base, and independent expert and video reviews (up to ±0.5 points), owner opinions (up to ±0.3) and best-of lists (up to +0.3) move it up or down.
Explore Tablets Methodology v3.0

Lenovo IdeaTab S2110 WiFi (1GB + 16GB) review: 168 specs compared

Avg. price:~£300RAM capacity:1 GBInternal storage:16 GBScreen size:10.1 inchesChipset:Qualcomm Snapdragon S4

Lenovo IdeaTab S2110 WiFi (1GB + 16GB) Review: Compare 168 technical specifications and 16 expert and video reviews to see how this product ranks in the Tablets category and whether it is worth buying.

6.1/10

Overall score

Score
6.1/ 10
✕
What it is
Our main score for this model, 1–10. It combines specs, best-of lists, expert reviews and owners.
How we count it
Parts: Technical score 35%, List score 30%, Reviews score 25%, Sentiment score 10%
Marks: Each part gets a mark out of 10. For reviews, lists and owners, a typical model in this category gets about 8 and the best one gets 10.
No data yet: A part with no data shows "?". It counts as the mark of a weaker model in this category (4 in 5 models with data score higher). This way, models with reviews, lists and owners usually come out ahead.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 81% of models
Score components

35%

5.4

Technical score

30%

?

List scoreNot enough data yet, so we use 7.5, the mark of a weaker model in this category

25%

5.4

Reviews score

10%

?

Sentiment scoreNot enough data yet, so we use 6.9, the mark of a weaker model in this category

â–¼Worse than 81% of tablets
7.0

Value for money

Value for money
7.0/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the tablet's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a tablet with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 83% of models
Score components

70%

6.1

Overall score

30%

8.9

Price

â–¼Worse than 83%
5.4

Technical score

Technical score
5.4/ 10
✕
What it is
How good the specs are compared with the other models in this category, 1–10.
How we count it
Areas: We rate the specs in each area against the other models in this category.
Weighting: The areas that matter most to buyers count more. The shares are shown under Score components.
Share: The technical score is 35% of the overall score.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 76% of models
Score components

22%

4.6

Performance

20%

6.0

Display

16%

5.9

Camera

14%

4.3

Battery

12%

5.9

Connectivity

8%

6.0

Software

5%

5.3

Design

3%

4.8

Audio

â–¼Worse than 76%
5.4

Reviews score

Reviews score
5.4/ 10
✕
What it is
Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
How we count it
Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves. Big test sites count more, short reviews half as much as full tests. A video review counts half.
Score: The average grade is 80% of the review mark; the number of reviews is the other 20% (1 review = 5, the typical number in this category = 8, the most-reviewed model = 10).
Enough data: With few reviews, the average grade is pulled toward the typical grade of this category. No reviews yet: 7.4 for now.
Share: Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 81% of models

5.4

Mark 7.7 is below the typical mark 7.8 of this category, so it cannot lift the score above the technical score

80%

7.6

Average grade

20%

8.2

Popularity

Grades by review (16)
11 reviews: 6 with a printed score, 5 estimated from the review. 5 video reviews, each counting half as much as a written test. Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
User ratings collected online are not part of this score.
â–¼Worse than 81%
?

List score

List score
7.5/ 10
✕
What it is
How often independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers put this model in their best-of lists for this category.
How we count it
Points: The model in the most lists of this category gets 10; the others get 8 to 10 in proportion. In no list yet: 7.5. Lists count 30% of the overall score.
Enough data: Every list counts, even a single one. With fewer than 5 best-of lists in the category, this part is left out.
Lists with this model (0)
Not in any best-of list yet, so this part counts as 7.5. Models in a list get 8 to 10.
Not in any best-of list yet
  • No image
No image
Where to buy
    N/A~ £300
Best rankings
Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Other versions:
1GB + 16GB1GB + 32GB

What reviewers say about the Lenovo IdeaTab S2110 WiFi (1GB + 16GB)

Based on 11 · 5

Reviewers love the sharp display and handy keyboard, but many find it sluggish and criticise the software.
Praised
Mixed views
Criticised
Pick a topic to see who said what
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of tablet Lenovo IdeaTab S2110 WiFi (1GB + 16GB)

Technical score
Technical score
5.4/ 10
✕
What it is
How good the specs are compared with the other models in this category, 1–10.
How we count it
Areas: We rate the specs in each area against the other models in this category.
Weighting: The areas that matter most to buyers count more. The shares are shown under Score components.
Share: The technical score is 35% of the overall score.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 76% of models
Score components:

22%

4.6

Performance

20%

6.0

Display

16%

5.9

Camera

14%

4.3

Battery

12%

5.9

Connectivity

8%

6.0

Software

5%

5.3

Design

3%

4.8

Audio

5.4
Reviews score
5.4
List score
?
Value for money
Value for money
7.0/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the tablet's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a tablet with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 83% of models
Score components:

70%

6.1

Overall score

30%

8.9

Price

7.0
RAM capacity
1 GB
Market range: <1 GB – >8 GB
This tablet has 1 GB of RAM, which is less than 78% of tablets and equal to 19.1% of tablets.
Process node
28 nm
Market range: <4 nm – >40 nm
This tablet is built on a 28 nm process, which is larger than 65.1% of tablets and equal to 17.6% of tablets.
Internal storage
16 GB
Market range: <16 GB – >256 GB
This tablet has 16 GB of internal storage, which is less than 78.8% of tablets and equal to 14.8% of tablets.
Geekbench 6 single-core score
?
Chipset
Qualcomm Snapdragon S4
This tablet runs on Qualcomm Snapdragon S4, which is less advanced than 75.1% of tablets and equal to 0.9% of tablets.
Show more
What reviewers say
Screen resolution
1280×800
This tablet has a 1280×800 screen, which is less sharp than 68.1% of tablets and equal to 21.7% of tablets.
Refresh rate
?
Display type
IPS LCD
This tablet uses a IPS LCD display type. 17% of tablets use this display technology.
Pixel density
149 ppi
Market range: <149 ppi – >291 ppi
This tablet has a pixel density of 149 ppi, which is lower than 86.8% of tablets and equal to 9.2% of tablets.
Display glass type
?
Show more
What reviewers say
Optical image stabilization
no
This tablet does not support optical stabilisation. 0.4% of tablets offer this.
Main camera megapixels
5 MP
Market range: <3.15 MP – >13 MP
This tablet has a rear camera with 5 MP resolution, which is lower than 63.7% of tablets and equal to 26% of tablets.
Front camera megapixels
1.3 MP
Market range: <1.2 MP – >9 MP
This tablet has a front camera with 1.3 MP resolution, which is lower than 80.9% of tablets and equal to 5.4% of tablets.
Main camera aperture
?
Optical zoom
N/A
Show more
What reviewers say
Battery capacity
6,320 mAh
Market range: <4k mAh – >10.1k mAh
This tablet has 6,320 mAh battery capacity, which is smaller than 52.5% of tablets and equal to 0.1% of tablets.
Charging speed
10 W
Market range: <10 W – >45 W
This tablet charges at 10 W, which is slower than 60.9% of tablets and equal to 33.3% of tablets.
Battery life
9 hours
Market range: <7 hours – >16 hours
This tablet has a battery life of 9 hours, which is shorter than that of 62.7% of tablets and equal to that of 6.9% of tablets.
web browsing
Wireless charging
no
This tablet does not support wireless charging. 1.5% of tablets offer this.
Fast charging
no
This tablet does not support fast charging. 56.9% of tablets offer this.
Show more
What reviewers say
LTE support
no
This tablet does not have built-in LTE. 42.9% of tablets offer this.
Wi-Fi connectivity
yes
This tablet connects to Wi-Fi. 0.2% of tablets offer this.
GPS
yes
This tablet has built-in GPS. 17.1% of tablets offer this.
5G connectivity
no
This tablet does not support 5G. 8.1% of tablets offer this.
NFC
no
This tablet does not include NFC. 10.8% of tablets offer this.
Show more
What reviewers say
Operating system
Android
This tablet uses the Android operating system, which is more advanced than the one used by 23.2%.
Update support duration
short
This tablet offers short update support, which is shorter than the support period of 52.4% of tablets and equal to that of 47.6% of tablets.
Direct OS updates
yes
This tablet supports direct OS updates. 20.3% of tablets offer this.
On-device AI
no
This tablet does not support on-device AI. 28.3% of tablets support this capability.
App tracking protection
no
This tablet does not support app tracking protection. 28.4% of tablets offer this.
Show more
What reviewers say
IP rating
not rated
This tablet's IP rating is not rated, which is less protected than 16.5% of tablets and the same as 83.6% of tablets.
Weight
580 g
Market range: <315 g – >730 g
This tablet weighs 580 g, which is heavier than 70.9% of tablets and equal to 1.1% of tablets.
Backlit keyboard
no
This tablet does not support a backlit keyboard. 9.7% of tablets support backlit keyboards.
Keyboard accessory
yes
This tablet supports a keyboard accessory. 15.8% of tablets support this option.
Pen latency
N/A
Show more
What reviewers say
Number of microphones
1
Market range: <1 – >3
This tablet has a microphone array of 1, which is more than 0.2% of tablets and equal to 54.8% of tablets.
aptX Adaptive
no
This tablet does not support aptX Adaptive. 6.9% of tablets offer this.
Dolby Atmos support
no
This tablet does not support Dolby Atmos. 31.3% of tablets support Dolby Atmos.
N. of speakers
2
Market range: <2 – >4
This tablet includes 2 speakers, which is more than in 9.8% of tablets and equal to the number in 60.8% of tablets.
FM radio
yes
This tablet includes an FM radio. 81.1% of tablets offer this.
Show more
What reviewers say

Lenovo IdeaTab S2110 WiFi (1GB + 16GB) vs the average tablet

246810TotalPerformanceDisplayCameraBatteryConnectivitySoftwareDesignAudio
  • More advanced graphics
    This tablet has more advanced graphics than the average tablet (Adreno 225 vs Mali-G51).
    Adreno 225 vs Mali-G51
  • Manual focus control
    This tablet supports manual focus, while the average tablet does not. 36.9% of tablets support manual focus.
  • Built-in camera flash
    This tablet has a camera flash, while the average tablet does not. 45.5% of tablets have one.
  • 20 nits higher typical brightness
    This tablet has a higher typical brightness than the average tablet (420 nits vs 400 nits). The average tablet reaches 400 nits typical brightness.
    420 nits vs 400 nits
  • More advanced chipset
    This tablet has a more advanced chipset than the average tablet (Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 vs MediaTek MT8169A).
    Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 vs MediaTek MT8169A
  • Supports HDMI output
    This tablet supports HDMI output, while the average tablet does not. 49.8% of tablets offer this.
    micro-HDMI port
  • 4 more GPU execution units
    This tablet has more GPU execution units than the average tablet (8 vs 4). The average tablet has 4 GPU execution units.
    8 vs 4
  • More advanced graphics
    This tablet has more advanced graphics than the average tablet (Adreno 225 vs Mali-G51).
    Adreno 225 vs Mali-G51
  • More advanced chipset
    This tablet has a more advanced chipset than the average tablet (Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 vs MediaTek MT8169A).
    Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 vs MediaTek MT8169A
  • 4 more GPU execution units
    This tablet has more GPU execution units than the average tablet (8 vs 4). The average tablet has 4 GPU execution units.
    8 vs 4
  • 20 nits higher typical brightness
    This tablet has a higher typical brightness than the average tablet (420 nits vs 400 nits). The average tablet reaches 400 nits typical brightness.
    420 nits vs 400 nits
  • Manual focus control
    This tablet supports manual focus, while the average tablet does not. 36.9% of tablets support manual focus.
  • Built-in camera flash
    This tablet has a camera flash, while the average tablet does not. 45.5% of tablets have one.
  • Supports HDMI output
    This tablet supports HDMI output, while the average tablet does not. 49.8% of tablets offer this.
    micro-HDMI port
  • 6 fewer CPU threads
    This tablet has fewer CPU threads than the average tablet (2 vs 8). The average tablet has 8 CPU threads.
    2 vs 8
  • 3.7 MP lower front resolution
    This tablet has a lower-resolution front camera than the average tablet (1.3 MP vs 5 MP). The average tablet has a front camera of 5 MP.
    1.3 MP vs 5 MP
  • No USB-C port
    This tablet does not have a USB Type-C port, while the average tablet does. 54% of tablets have one.
  • 3 GB less RAM
    This tablet has less RAM than the average tablet (1 GB vs 4 GB). The average tablet has 4 GB of RAM.
    1 GB vs 4 GB
  • Shorter update support
    This tablet offers shorter update support than the average tablet (short vs medium). The average tablet gets medium of update support.
    short vs medium
  • No fast charging
    This tablet does not support fast charging, while the average tablet does. 56.8% of tablets support fast charging.
  • 22.9% lower review score
    Reviews score
    5.4/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
    How we count it
    Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves. Big test sites count more, short reviews half as much as full tests. A video review counts half.
    Score: The average grade is 80% of the review mark; the number of reviews is the other 20% (1 review = 5, the typical number in this category = 8, the most-reviewed model = 10).
    Enough data: With few reviews, the average grade is pulled toward the typical grade of this category. No reviews yet: 7.4 for now.
    Share: Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
    Score distribution
    â–¼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    â–¼ Worse than 81% of models

    5.4

    Mark 7.7 is below the typical mark 7.8 of this category, so it cannot lift the score above the technical score

    80%

    7.6

    Average grade

    20%

    8.2

    Popularity

    Grades by review (16)
    11 reviews: 6 with a printed score, 5 estimated from the review. 5 video reviews, each counting half as much as a written test. Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
    User ratings collected online are not part of this score.
    5.4 vs 7.0
  • 32.6% softer screen detail
    This tablet has softer screen detail than the average tablet (149 ppi vs 221 ppi). The average tablet has a pixel density of 221 ppi.
    149 ppi vs 221 ppi
  • 22.9% lower review score
    Reviews score
    5.4/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
    How we count it
    Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves. Big test sites count more, short reviews half as much as full tests. A video review counts half.
    Score: The average grade is 80% of the review mark; the number of reviews is the other 20% (1 review = 5, the typical number in this category = 8, the most-reviewed model = 10).
    Enough data: With few reviews, the average grade is pulled toward the typical grade of this category. No reviews yet: 7.4 for now.
    Share: Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
    Score distribution
    â–¼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    â–¼ Worse than 81% of models

    5.4

    Mark 7.7 is below the typical mark 7.8 of this category, so it cannot lift the score above the technical score

    80%

    7.6

    Average grade

    20%

    8.2

    Popularity

    Grades by review (16)
    11 reviews: 6 with a printed score, 5 estimated from the review. 5 video reviews, each counting half as much as a written test. Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
    User ratings collected online are not part of this score.
    5.4 vs 7.0
  • 8.1% worse value for money
    Lenovo IdeaTab S2110 WiFi (1GB + 16GB) has worse value for money than the average tablet (6.99 vs 7.6).
    6.99 vs 7.55
  • 6 fewer CPU threads
    This tablet has fewer CPU threads than the average tablet (2 vs 8). The average tablet has 8 CPU threads.
    2 vs 8
  • 3 GB less RAM
    This tablet has less RAM than the average tablet (1 GB vs 4 GB). The average tablet has 4 GB of RAM.
    1 GB vs 4 GB
  • 25% lower CPU speed
    This tablet has a lower CPU speed than the average tablet (1.5 GHz vs 2 GHz). The average tablet has CPU speed of 2 GHz.
    1.5 GHz vs 2 GHz
  • 1,266 MHz slower RAM speed
    This tablet has a lower RAM speed than the average tablet (600 MHz vs 1,866 MHz). The average tablet has RAM speed of 1,866 MHz.
    600 MHz vs 1,866 MHz
  • 75% less internal storage
    This tablet has less internal storage than the average tablet (16 GB vs 64 GB). The average tablet has 64 GB of internal storage.
    16 GB vs 64 GB
  • 2x larger process node
    This tablet has a larger process node than the average tablet (28 nm vs 14 nm). The average tablet is built on 14 nm.
    28 nm vs 14 nm
  • No big.LITTLE architecture
    This tablet does not support big.LITTLE architecture, while the average tablet does. 51.7% of tablets support big.LITTLE architecture.
  • 57% less memory bandwidth
    This tablet has less memory bandwidth than the average tablet (6.4 GB/s vs 14.9 GB/s). The average tablet has 14.9 GB/s of memory bandwidth.
    6.4 GB/s vs 14.9 GB/s
  • 7 years older
    This tablet was released earlier than the average tablet (2012 vs 2019). The average tablet was released in 2019.
    August 2012
    2012 vs 2019
  • More basic memory type
    This tablet uses less advanced memory than the average tablet (LPDDR2 vs LPDDR3).
    LPDDR2 vs LPDDR3
  • 32.6% softer screen detail
    This tablet has softer screen detail than the average tablet (149 ppi vs 221 ppi). The average tablet has a pixel density of 221 ppi.
    149 ppi vs 221 ppi
  • Less sharp display
    This tablet has a less sharp screen than the average tablet (1280×800 vs 1920×1200).
    1,280×800 vs 1,920×1,200
  • Less vivid contrast
    This tablet has less contrast than the average tablet (900:1 vs 1015:1). The average tablet has a contrast ratio of 1015:1.
    900:1 vs 1,015:1
  • 3.7 MP lower front resolution
    This tablet has a lower-resolution front camera than the average tablet (1.3 MP vs 5 MP). The average tablet has a front camera of 5 MP.
    1.3 MP vs 5 MP
  • No continuous video AF
    This tablet does not support continuous video AF, the average tablet does. 57.7% of tablets support continuous video autofocus.
  • 3 MP lower rear resolution
    This tablet has a lower-resolution rear camera than the average tablet (5 MP vs 8 MP). The average tablet has a rear camera of 8 MP.
    5 MP vs 8 MP
  • No manual white balance
    This tablet does not support manual white balance, while the average tablet does. 51.5% of tablets support manual white balance.
  • No timelapse video
    This tablet does not support timelapse video, while the average tablet does. 57.5% of tablets support timelapse video.
  • No fast charging
    This tablet does not support fast charging, while the average tablet does. 56.8% of tablets support fast charging.
  • 44.4% slower charging
    This tablet charges slower than the average tablet (10 W vs 18 W). The average tablet charges at 18 W.
    10 W vs 18 W
  • 1 hours shorter battery life
    This tablet offers shorter battery life than the average tablet (9 hours vs 10 hours). The average tablet offers 10 hours of battery life.
    web browsing
    9 hours vs 10 hours
  • No USB-C port
    This tablet does not have a USB Type-C port, while the average tablet does. 54% of tablets have one.
  • Older Wi-Fi standard
    This tablet has an older Wi-Fi standard than the average tablet (Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n) vs Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac)).
    Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n) vs Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac)
  • Older Bluetooth version
    This tablet has an older Bluetooth version than the average tablet (4 vs 5).
    4 vs 5
  • Shorter update support
    This tablet offers shorter update support than the average tablet (short vs medium). The average tablet gets medium of update support.
    short vs medium
  • No split-screen
    This tablet does not support split-screen, the average tablet does. 72.8% of tablets support split-screen.
  • No picture-in-picture mode
    This tablet does not support picture-in-picture, the average tablet does. 61.4% of tablets support picture-in-picture.
  • No camera and mic privacy
    This tablet does not support camera and mic privacy, while the average tablet does. 56.6% of tablets offer this.
  • No multi-user mode
    User score
    8.0/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    Average of independent expert reviews and videos, graded by us; missing reviews count as 7/10.
    When it matters
    When you want to know how independent test sites and video reviewers rate the product in real use.
    Score distribution
    â–¼
    â–¼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    Lenovo IdeaTab S2110 WiFi
    the average tablet
    Lenovo IdeaTab S2110 WiFi (1GB + 16GB) does not support multi-user mode, while the average tablet does. 73.8% of tablets offer this.
  • No full-page screenshots
    This tablet does not support full-page screenshots, the average tablet does. 53% of tablets support full-page screenshots.
  • No location privacy
    This tablet does not support location privacy, while the average tablet does. 76.7% of tablets offer this.
  • No dark mode
    This tablet does not support dark mode, while the average tablet does. 57.7% of tablets offer this.
  • No offline voice recognition
    This tablet does not support offline voice recognition, the average tablet does. 76.4% of tablets support offline voice recognition.
  • 18.4% heavier
    This tablet is heavier than the average tablet (580 g vs 490 g). The average tablet weighs 490 g.
    580 g vs 490 g
  • 84.5 mm wider
    This tablet is wider than the average tablet (259.8 mm vs 175.3 mm). The average tablet is 175.3 mm wide.
    259.8 mm vs 175.3 mm
  • 0.69 mm thicker
    This tablet is thicker than the average tablet (8.7 mm vs 8 mm). The average tablet is 8 mm thick.
    8.69 mm vs 8 mm

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

7.0
MobileCupOfJoe
✓ explicit
15/02/2013
Full review · design, software and price comparison
Verdict
Lenovo IdeaTab S2110 WiFi is a decent choice, but its price and Lenovo skin hold it back against rivals.
8.0
TechBargains
✓ explicit
21/12/2012
Hands-on review · battery life and dock tests
Verdict
Lenovo IdeaTab S2110 WiFi is a good choice for long battery life, despite dock quirks and Wi-Fi issues.
8.0
Android Authority
≈ estimated
19/10/2012
Hands-on review · build, battery, camera and dock
Verdict
Lenovo IdeaTab S2110 WiFi is useful and well built with some good features, but the price is the main problem.
9.0
MobileTechReview
≈ estimated
28/09/2012
Hands-on review · performance, screen and app tests
Verdict
Lenovo IdeaTab S2110 WiFi is a very good tablet and strong competition for the Asus Transformer line, with a good keyboard.
Overview video
Not graded
Hands-on video, no verdict

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

6.5
cnet.com
✓ explicit
03/10/2012
Hands-on review · Build quality
Verdict
The Lenovo IdeaTab S2110A is bright and handles fast games well, but a flexing body and a price rivals beat for value hold it back.
8.4
notebookcheck.net
✓ explicit
22/10/2012
Lab test · Battery runtimes
Verdict
The Lenovo IdeaTab S2110 is a bright, thin tablet that suits simple tasks and movies on the go, but sluggish menus and average build hold it back.
6.0
uk.pcmag.com
✓ explicit
04/10/2012
Hands-on test · Keyboard dock
Verdict
The Lenovo IdeaTab S2110A stands out mainly with its optional keyboard dock, which adds comfortable typing and extra battery; alone, choppy animations and weak cameras hold it back.
7.0
laptopmag.com
✓ explicit
15/10/2012
Lab test · Keyboard dock
Verdict
The Lenovo IdeaTab S2110A is a snappy tablet with long battery life, but its flexible plastic body and cramped dock keys make it less ideal for heavy typing.
9.0
deviceguru.com
≈ estimated
14/11/2012
Hands-on test · Customization tour
Verdict
The Lenovo IdeaTab S2110 is one of the thinnest, lightest 10-inch tablets, with better cameras than Galaxy Tab 2 but no GPS or microSD slot.
9.0
mobiletechreview.com
≈ estimated
10/10/2012
Hands-on test · Keyboard dock
Verdict
The Lenovo IdeaTab S2110 is a thin, bright tablet whose keyboard dock is among the best for typing, though its plain styling and slight UI lag hold it back.
9.0
zdnet.com
≈ estimated
01/10/2012
Hands-on review · Laptop dock
Verdict
The Lenovo IdeaTab S2110 is a light tablet whose laptop dock offers a very good keyboard and nearly 20 hours of battery, though it runs Android 4.0.
7.0
engadget.com
≈ estimated
16/10/2012
Hands-on review · Dock typing
Verdict
The Lenovo IdeaTab S2110 is a competent Transformer rival, with a comfortable keyboard dock and responsive apps, but a slow cube animation and many preloaded apps weigh it down.
3.0
androidpolice.com
≈ estimated
07/10/2012
Hands-on review · Performance check
Verdict
The Lenovo IdeaTab S2110 has a crisp, wide-angle IPS screen and good battery life, but lagging performance and a flimsy build make it hard to recommend.
8.4
notebookcheck.com
✓ explicit
12/11/2012
Lab test · Display and heat
Verdict
The Lenovo IdeaTab S2110 has a stable IPS screen that works moderately outdoors, but it runs warm under load and multitasks more slowly.
9.0
hifitest.de
✓ explicit
18/04/2013
Lab test · Keyboard dock
Verdict
The Lenovo IdeaTab S2110 is a thin, light tablet whose dock adds about five hours of battery and a steady hinge, though the tablet alone lasts under seven hours.

Third-party reviews

What customers like about Lenovo IdeaTab S2110 WiFi (1GB + 16GB)

  • Excellent battery life, especially when paired with the optional keyboard dock which can extend it to over 13 hours.
  • Bright 10.1-inch IPS display with wide viewing angles and accurate color reproduction.
  • Highly functional optional keyboard dock that adds two full-size USB ports and an SD card reader.
  • Thin and lightweight design, making it very portable and comfortable for outdoor use.
  • Responsive virtual keyboard and inclusion of standard ports like micro-HDMI.

What customers don't like about Lenovo IdeaTab S2110 WiFi (1GB + 16GB)

  • Poor build quality; many reviewers described the all-plastic chassis as flimsy and prone to screen warping when handled.
  • No built-in microSD card slot on the tablet itself, requiring the keyboard dock for storage expansion.
  • Choppy performance in the home screen UI and animations, despite good performance in individual apps.
  • Subpar camera quality, particularly the front-facing camera which was noted for washed-out colors and graininess.
  • Thin and harsh-sounding stereo speakers that can distort at higher volumes.

Verdict

The Lenovo IdeaTab S2110 is a 10.1-inch Android tablet featuring a 1280 x 800 IPS display, powered by a 1.5 GHz dual-core Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 processor with 1GB of RAM and 16GB of internal storage. Its primary characteristic is its thin and lightweight design, coupled with a micro-HDMI port for video output and a textured, non-slip rear surface. Main pros include a bright screen with wide viewing angles, impressive battery life of over 8 hours, and compatibility with an optional keyboard dock that adds full-sized USB ports and doubles total battery runtime. However, users may encounter cons such as a somewhat flimsy build quality that can cause screen warping, the lack of a built-in microSD card slot for storage expansion, and occasional choppy performance during home screen animations.

Compare Lenovo IdeaTab S2110 WiFi (1GB + 16GB) with other tablets

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Lenovo IdeaTab S2110 WiFi (1GB + 16GB) and other tablets

No results found