OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS
Scored using Tablets Methodology v3.0
Tablets Methodology v3.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontum Tablets Methodology v3.0: the technical score from the specifications is the base, and independent expert and video reviews (up to ±0.5 points), owner opinions (up to ±0.3) and best-of lists (up to +0.3) move it up or down.
Explore Tablets Methodology v3.0

Huawei MatePad 10.4 2022 WiFi (4GB + 128GB) review: 168 specs compared

Avg. price:~£280RAM capacity:4 GBInternal storage:128 GBScreen size:10.4 inchesChipset:Kirin 710A

Huawei MatePad 10.4 2022 WiFi (4GB + 128GB) Review: Compare 168 technical specifications and 5 expert and video reviews to see how this product ranks in the Tablets category and whether it is worth buying.

Huawei MatePad 10.4 2022 WiFi (4GB + 128GB)
7.0/10

Overall score

Score
7.0/ 10
✕
What it is
Our main score for this model, 1–10. It combines specs, best-of lists, expert reviews and owners.
How we count it
Parts: Technical score 35%, List score 30%, Reviews score 25%, Sentiment score 10%
Marks: Each part gets a mark out of 10. For reviews, lists and owners, a typical model in this category gets about 8 and the best one gets 10.
No data yet: A part with no data shows "?". It counts as the mark of a weaker model in this category (4 in 5 models with data score higher). This way, models with reviews, lists and owners usually come out ahead.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 53% of models
Score components

35%

7.0

Technical score

30%

?

List scoreNot enough data yet, so we use 7.5, the mark of a weaker model in this category

25%

7.0

Reviews score

10%

6.0

Sentiment score

â–²Better than 53% of tablets
7.6

Value for money

Value for money
7.6/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the tablet's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a tablet with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 50% of models
Score components

70%

7.0

Overall score

30%

9.0

Price

â–²Better than 50%
7.0

Technical score

Technical score
7.0/ 10
✕
What it is
How good the specs are compared with the other models in this category, 1–10.
How we count it
Areas: We rate the specs in each area against the other models in this category.
Weighting: The areas that matter most to buyers count more. The shares are shown under Score components.
Share: The technical score is 35% of the overall score.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 68% of models
Score components

22%

6.4

Performance

20%

5.7

Display

16%

8.5

Camera

14%

7.1

Battery

12%

6.7

Connectivity

8%

8.9

Software

5%

7.2

Design

3%

6.9

Audio

â–²Better than 68%
7.0

Reviews score

Reviews score
7.0/ 10
✕
What it is
Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
How we count it
Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves. Big test sites count more, short reviews half as much as full tests. A video review counts half.
Score: The average grade is 80% of the review mark; the number of reviews is the other 20% (1 review = 5, the typical number in this category = 8, the most-reviewed model = 10).
Enough data: With few reviews, the average grade is pulled toward the typical grade of this category. No reviews yet: 7.4 for now.
Share: Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 58% of models

7.0

Mark 7.7 is below the typical mark 7.8 of this category, so it cannot lift the score above the technical score

80%

7.9

Average grade

20%

6.9

Popularity

Grades by review (5)
2 reviews: 1 with a printed score, 1 estimated from the review. 3 video reviews, each counting half as much as a written test. Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
User ratings collected online are not part of this score.
â–¼Worse than 58%
?

List score

List score
7.5/ 10
✕
What it is
How often independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers put this model in their best-of lists for this category.
How we count it
Points: The model in the most lists of this category gets 10; the others get 8 to 10 in proportion. In no list yet: 7.5. Lists count 30% of the overall score.
Enough data: Every list counts, even a single one. With fewer than 5 best-of lists in the category, this part is left out.
Lists with this model (0)
Not in any best-of list yet, so this part counts as 7.5. Models in a list get 8 to 10.
Not in any best-of list yet
  • huawei-matepad-10-4-2022-4gb-128gb-wifi
  • huawei-matepad-10-4-2022-4gb-128gb-wifi
  • huawei-matepad-10-4-2022-4gb-128gb-wifi
  • huawei-matepad-10-4-2022-4gb-128gb-wifi
  • huawei-matepad-10-4-2022-4gb-128gb-wifi
  • huawei-matepad-10-4-2022-4gb-128gb-wifi
  • huawei-matepad-10-4-2022-4gb-128gb-wifi
  • huawei-matepad-10-4-2022-4gb-128gb-wifi
  • huawei-matepad-10-4-2022-4gb-128gb-wifi
huawei-matepad-10-4-2022-4gb-128gb-wifi
huawei-matepad-10-4-2022-4gb-128gb-wifi
huawei-matepad-10-4-2022-4gb-128gb-wifi
huawei-matepad-10-4-2022-4gb-128gb-wifi
huawei-matepad-10-4-2022-4gb-128gb-wifi
huawei-matepad-10-4-2022-4gb-128gb-wifi
huawei-matepad-10-4-2022-4gb-128gb-wifi
huawei-matepad-10-4-2022-4gb-128gb-wifi
huawei-matepad-10-4-2022-4gb-128gb-wifi
Where to buy
    N/A~ £280
Best rankings
Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Other versions:
4GB + 128GB4GB + 64GB

What reviewers say about the Huawei MatePad 10.4 2022 WiFi (4GB + 128GB)

Based on 2 · 3

Reviewers enjoy the sound and display quality with solid battery life, but find performance sluggish and the ports lacking.
Praised
Criticised
Pick a topic to see who said what
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of tablet Huawei MatePad 10.4 2022 WiFi (4GB + 128GB)

Technical score
Technical score
7.0/ 10
✕
What it is
How good the specs are compared with the other models in this category, 1–10.
How we count it
Areas: We rate the specs in each area against the other models in this category.
Weighting: The areas that matter most to buyers count more. The shares are shown under Score components.
Share: The technical score is 35% of the overall score.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 68% of models
Score components:

22%

6.4

Performance

20%

5.7

Display

16%

8.5

Camera

14%

7.1

Battery

12%

6.7

Connectivity

8%

8.9

Software

5%

7.2

Design

3%

6.9

Audio

7.0
Reviews score
7.0
List score
?
Value for money
Value for money
7.6/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the tablet's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a tablet with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 50% of models
Score components:

70%

7.0

Overall score

30%

9.0

Price

7.6
RAM capacity
4 GB
Market range: <1 GB – >8 GB
This tablet has 4 GB of RAM, which is more than 47.2% of tablets and equal to 17.8% of tablets.
Process node
14 nm
Market range: <4 nm – >40 nm
This tablet is built on a 14 nm process, which is smaller than 44.6% of tablets and equal to 8.5% of tablets.
Internal storage
128 GB
Market range: <16 GB – >256 GB
This tablet has 128 GB of internal storage, which is more than 56.2% of tablets and equal to 20% of tablets.
Geekbench 6 single-core score
319 points
Market range: <233 points – >2.3k points
This tablet scores 319 points in single-core tests, which is lower than 82% of tablets and equal to 2.1% of tablets.
Chipset
Kirin 710A
This tablet runs on Kirin 710A, which is more advanced than 69.1% of tablets and equal to 1.2% of tablets.
Show more
What reviewers say
Screen resolution
2000×1200
This tablet has a 2000×1200 screen, which is sharper than 58.1% of tablets and equal to 8.1% of tablets.
Refresh rate
60 Hz
Market range: <60 Hz – >120 Hz
This tablet has a 60 Hz screen, which is smoother than 0.1% of tablets and equal to 73.4% of tablets.
Display type
IPS LCD
This tablet uses a IPS LCD display type. 17% of tablets use this display technology.
Pixel density
224 ppi
Market range: <149 ppi – >291 ppi
This tablet has a pixel density of 224 ppi, which is higher than 50.1% of tablets and equal to 11.5% of tablets.
Display glass type
Chemically Strengthened Glass
This tablet protects its screen with Chemically Strengthened Glass, which is less durable than 65.1% of tablets and the same as 12.9% of tablets.
Show more
What reviewers say
Optical image stabilization
no
This tablet does not support optical stabilisation. 0.4% of tablets offer this.
Main camera megapixels
?
Front camera megapixels
8 MP
Market range: <1.2 MP – >9 MP
This tablet has a front camera with 8 MP resolution, which is higher than 69.6% of tablets and equal to 19.5% of tablets.
Main camera aperture
f/1.8
This tablet has a main camera aperture of f/1.8, which is wider than 85.9% of tablets and equal to 14.1% of tablets.
Optical zoom
1xxx
This tablet has 1xx optical zoom, which is stronger than 18.2% of tablets and equal to 80.9% of tablets.
Show more
Battery capacity
7,250 mAh
Market range: <4k mAh – >10.1k mAh
This tablet has 7,250 mAh battery capacity, which is larger than 60% of tablets and equal to 1.9% of tablets.
Charging speed
22.5 W
Market range: <10 W – >45 W
This tablet charges at 22.5 W, which is faster than 66.6% of tablets and equal to 2.4% of tablets.
Battery life
12 hours
Market range: <7 hours – >16 hours
This tablet has a battery life of 12 hours, which is longer than that of 65.7% of tablets and equal to that of 9.3% of tablets.
mixed use
Wireless charging
no
This tablet does not support wireless charging. 1.5% of tablets offer this.
Fast charging
yes
This tablet supports fast charging. 43.2% of tablets offer this.
Show more
What reviewers say
LTE support
no
This tablet does not have built-in LTE. 42.9% of tablets offer this.
Wi-Fi connectivity
yes
This tablet connects to Wi-Fi. 0.2% of tablets offer this.
GPS
yes
This tablet has built-in GPS. 17.1% of tablets offer this.
5G connectivity
no
This tablet does not support 5G. 8.1% of tablets offer this.
NFC
no
This tablet does not include NFC. 10.8% of tablets offer this.
Show more
What reviewers say
Operating system
HarmonyOS
This tablet uses the HarmonyOS operating system, which is less advanced than the one used by 77.7%.
Update support duration
medium
This tablet offers medium update support, which is longer than the support period of 47.6% of tablets and equal to that of 32.4% of tablets.
Direct OS updates
yes
This tablet supports direct OS updates. 20.3% of tablets offer this.
On-device AI
yes
This tablet supports on-device AI. 71.7% of tablets support this capability.
App tracking protection
yes
This tablet supports app tracking protection. 71.6% of tablets offer this.
Show more
What reviewers say
IP rating
not rated
This tablet's IP rating is not rated, which is less protected than 16.5% of tablets and the same as 83.6% of tablets.
Weight
460 g
Market range: <315 g – >730 g
This tablet weighs 460 g, which is lighter than 62.3% of tablets and equal to 2.5% of tablets.
Backlit keyboard
no
This tablet does not support a backlit keyboard. 9.7% of tablets support backlit keyboards.
Keyboard accessory
yes
This tablet supports a keyboard accessory. 15.8% of tablets support this option.
Pen latency
?
Show more
Number of microphones
3
Market range: <1 – >3
This tablet has a microphone array of 3, which is more than 87.8% of tablets and equal to 5.3% of tablets.
aptX Adaptive
no
This tablet does not support aptX Adaptive. 6.9% of tablets offer this.
Dolby Atmos support
no
This tablet does not support Dolby Atmos. 31.3% of tablets support Dolby Atmos.
N. of speakers
4
Market range: <2 – >4
This tablet includes 4 speakers, which is more than in 70.8% of tablets and equal to the number in 22.9% of tablets.
FM radio
no
This tablet does not include an FM radio. 19% of tablets offer this.
Show more
What reviewers say

Huawei MatePad 10.4 2022 WiFi (4GB + 128GB) vs the average tablet

246810TotalPerformanceDisplayCameraBatteryConnectivitySoftwareDesignAudio
  • More advanced chipset
    This tablet has a more advanced chipset than the average tablet (Kirin 710A vs MediaTek MT8169A).
    Kirin 710A vs MediaTek MT8169A
  • Wider main camera aperture
    This tablet has a wider main camera aperture than the average tablet (f/1.8 vs f/2.2). The average tablet's main camera aperture is f/2.2.
    f/1.8 vs f/2.2
  • 3 MP higher front resolution
    This tablet has a higher-resolution front camera than the average tablet (8 MP vs 5 MP). The average tablet has a front camera of 5 MP.
    8 MP vs 5 MP
  • 2 more speakers
    This tablet has more speakers than the average tablet (4 vs 2). The average tablet has 2 speakers.
    4 vs 2
  • Supports manual shutter speed
    This tablet supports manual shutter speed, while the average tablet does not. 21.8% of tablets support manual shutter speed.
  • 2 hours longer battery life
    This tablet offers longer battery life than the average tablet (12 hours vs 10 hours). The average tablet offers 10 hours of battery life.
    mixed use
    12 hours vs 10 hours
  • 70 nits higher typical brightness
    This tablet has a higher typical brightness than the average tablet (470 nits vs 400 nits). The average tablet reaches 400 nits typical brightness.
    470 nits vs 400 nits
  • Wider front camera aperture
    This tablet has a wider front camera aperture than the average tablet (f/2 vs f/2.2). The average tablet's front camera aperture is f/2.2.
    f/2.0 vs f/2.2
  • More advanced chipset
    This tablet has a more advanced chipset than the average tablet (Kirin 710A vs MediaTek MT8169A).
    Kirin 710A vs MediaTek MT8169A
  • 18% higher CPU speed
    This tablet has a higher CPU speed than the average tablet (2.4 GHz vs 2 GHz). The average tablet has CPU speed of 2 GHz.
    2.36 GHz vs 2 GHz
  • More advanced memory type
    This tablet uses more advanced memory than the average tablet (LPDDR4X vs LPDDR3).
    LPDDR4X vs LPDDR3
  • 2x more internal storage
    This tablet has more internal storage than the average tablet (128 GB vs 64 GB). The average tablet has 64 GB of internal storage.
    128 GB vs 64 GB
  • Includes neural engine
    This tablet includes a neural engine, the average tablet does not. 25.6% of tablets include a neural engine.
  • 30.8% faster GPU clock
    This tablet runs its GPU faster than the average tablet (850 MHz vs 650 MHz). The average tablet runs its GPU at 650 MHz.
    850 MHz vs 650 MHz
  • 70 nits higher typical brightness
    This tablet has a higher typical brightness than the average tablet (470 nits vs 400 nits). The average tablet reaches 400 nits typical brightness.
    470 nits vs 400 nits
  • 69 nits brighter screen
    This tablet is brighter than the average tablet (470 nits vs 401 nits). The average tablet reaches 401 nits.
    470 nits vs 401 nits
  • 0.3 inches larger screen
    This tablet has a larger screen than the average tablet (10.4 inches vs 10.1 inches). The average tablet measures 10.1 inches.
    10.4 inches vs 10.1 inches
  • Sharper display
    This tablet has a sharper screen than the average tablet (2000×1200 vs 1920×1200).
    2,000×1,200 vs 1,920×1,200
  • More vivid contrast
    This tablet has more contrast than the average tablet (1300:1 vs 1015:1). The average tablet has a contrast ratio of 1015:1.
    1,300:1 vs 1,015:1
  • Wider main camera aperture
    This tablet has a wider main camera aperture than the average tablet (f/1.8 vs f/2.2). The average tablet's main camera aperture is f/2.2.
    f/1.8 vs f/2.2
  • 3 MP higher front resolution
    This tablet has a higher-resolution front camera than the average tablet (8 MP vs 5 MP). The average tablet has a front camera of 5 MP.
    8 MP vs 5 MP
  • Supports manual shutter speed
    This tablet supports manual shutter speed, while the average tablet does not. 21.8% of tablets support manual shutter speed.
  • Manual focus control
    This tablet supports manual focus, while the average tablet does not. 36.9% of tablets support manual focus.
  • Wider front camera aperture
    This tablet has a wider front camera aperture than the average tablet (f/2 vs f/2.2). The average tablet's front camera aperture is f/2.2.
    f/2.0 vs f/2.2
  • Supports manual ISO
    This tablet supports manual ISO, while the average tablet does not. 45.9% of tablets support manual ISO.
  • Supports slow-motion video
    This tablet supports slow-motion recording, while the average tablet does not. 37.3% of tablets support slow-motion recording.
  • Built-in camera flash
    This tablet has a camera flash, while the average tablet does not. 45.5% of tablets have one.
  • 2 hours longer battery life
    This tablet offers longer battery life than the average tablet (12 hours vs 10 hours). The average tablet offers 10 hours of battery life.
    mixed use
    12 hours vs 10 hours
  • Monitors battery health
    This tablet monitors battery health, while the average tablet does not. 36.7% of tablets monitor battery health.
  • 25% faster charging
    This tablet charges faster than the average tablet (22.5 W vs 18 W). The average tablet charges at 18 W.
    22.5 W vs 18 W
  • 9.8% larger battery capacity
    This tablet has a larger battery capacity than the average tablet (7,250 mAh vs 6,600 mAh). The average tablet offers 6,600 mAh of battery capacity.
    7,250 mAh vs 6,600 mAh
  • Newer Bluetooth version
    This tablet has a newer Bluetooth version than the average tablet (5.1 vs 5).
    5.1 vs 5
  • Includes on-device AI
    This tablet includes on-device AI, the average tablet does not. 28.3% of tablets include on-device AI.
  • Supports live text recognition
    This tablet supports live text recognition, while the average tablet does not. 35.1% of tablets offer this.
  • Supports app tracking protection
    This tablet supports app tracking protection, while the average tablet does not. 28.4% of tablets offer this.
  • Supports dynamic themes
    This tablet supports dynamic themes, while the average tablet does not. 29.5% of tablets offer this.
  • Includes clipboard warnings
    This tablet has clipboard warnings, the average tablet does not. 40.3% of tablets include clipboard warnings.
  • Supports drawing
    This tablet is suitable for drawing, while the average tablet is not. 40% of tablets are suitable for drawing.
  • Supports stylus tilt
    This tablet supports stylus tilt, the average tablet does not. 33.5% of tablets support stylus tilt.
  • 6.1% lighter
    This tablet is lighter than the average tablet (460 g vs 490 g). The average tablet weighs 490 g.
    460 g vs 490 g
  • 0.65 mm thinner
    This tablet is thinner than the average tablet (7.4 mm vs 8 mm). The average tablet is 8 mm thick.
    7.35 mm vs 8 mm
  • 2 more speakers
    This tablet has more speakers than the average tablet (4 vs 2). The average tablet has 2 speakers.
    4 vs 2
  • 2 more microphones
    This tablet has more microphones than the average tablet (3 vs 1). The average tablet's microphone count is 1.
    3 vs 1
  • Supports LDAC
    This tablet supports LDAC, the average tablet does not. 25.3% of tablets support LDAC.
  • Less advanced operating system
    This tablet runs on a less advanced operating system than the average tablet (HarmonyOS vs Android). Operating system choice shapes app support, updates, and ecosystem features.
    HarmonyOS vs Android
  • 56.2% lower single-core score
    This tablet has a lower single-core score than the average tablet (319 points vs 729 points). The average tablet scores 729 points in single-core tests.
    319 points vs 729 points
  • 40.5% lower multi-core score
    This tablet has a lower multi-core score than the average tablet (1,125 points vs 1,891 points). The average tablet scores 1,891 points in multi-core tests.
    1,125 points vs 1,891 points
  • Less durable glass
    This tablet has less durable glass than the average tablet (Chemically Strengthened Glass vs Corning Gorilla Glass). The average tablet uses Corning Gorilla Glass.
    Chemically Strengthened Glass vs Corning Gorilla Glass
  • No headphone jack
    This tablet does not include a 3.5 mm headphone jack, while the average tablet does. 72.8% of tablets offer this.
  • No backside-illuminated sensor
    This tablet does not have a BSI sensor, while the average tablet does. 52.6% of tablets have a BSI sensor.
  • 20.0% lower sentiment score
    6.0 vs 7.5
  • 50% slower touch response
    This tablet samples touch more slowly than the average tablet (60 Hz vs 120 Hz). The average tablet samples touch at 120 Hz.
    60 Hz vs 120 Hz
  • 20.0% lower sentiment score
    6.0 vs 7.5
  • 56.2% lower single-core score
    This tablet has a lower single-core score than the average tablet (319 points vs 729 points). The average tablet scores 729 points in single-core tests.
    319 points vs 729 points
  • 40.5% lower multi-core score
    This tablet has a lower multi-core score than the average tablet (1,125 points vs 1,891 points). The average tablet scores 1,891 points in multi-core tests.
    1,125 points vs 1,891 points
  • Less durable glass
    This tablet has less durable glass than the average tablet (Chemically Strengthened Glass vs Corning Gorilla Glass). The average tablet uses Corning Gorilla Glass.
    Chemically Strengthened Glass vs Corning Gorilla Glass
  • 50% slower touch response
    This tablet samples touch more slowly than the average tablet (60 Hz vs 120 Hz). The average tablet samples touch at 120 Hz.
    60 Hz vs 120 Hz
  • No backside-illuminated sensor
    This tablet does not have a BSI sensor, while the average tablet does. 52.6% of tablets have a BSI sensor.
  • Less advanced operating system
    This tablet runs on a less advanced operating system than the average tablet (HarmonyOS vs Android). Operating system choice shapes app support, updates, and ecosystem features.
    HarmonyOS vs Android
  • 45.2 mm taller
    This tablet is taller than the average tablet (245.2 mm vs 200 mm). The average tablet is 200 mm tall.
    245.2 mm vs 200 mm
  • No headphone jack
    This tablet does not include a 3.5 mm headphone jack, while the average tablet does. 72.8% of tablets offer this.

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

Not graded yet
Not graded yet
Not graded yet
Not graded yet

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

7.0
techradar.com
≈ estimated
04/03/2022
Hands-on test · Value tablet
Verdict
The MatePad (2022) is a good-value media tablet with a sharp screen and four loud speakers, but Google-app users should look elsewhere.
8.0
tomshw.it
✓ explicit
18/05/2022
Review · Entry-level tablet
Verdict
The MatePad 10.4 is a well-priced tablet for media and light productivity, but its aging processor and cameras hold it back.

Third-party reviews

What customers like about Huawei MatePad 10.4 2022 WiFi (4GB + 128GB)

  • Premium aluminum build quality and sleek, slim design
  • Excellent quad-speaker system tuned by Harman Kardon for immersive audio
  • Sharp 2K (2000 x 1200) IPS display with good color balance
  • Impressive battery life, typically lasting over 8 hours of active use
  • Stable performance with no significant thermal throttling under load
  • Expandable storage via a dedicated microSD card slot
  • Support for useful accessories like the M-Pencil and smart magnetic keyboard

What customers don't like about Huawei MatePad 10.4 2022 WiFi (4GB + 128GB)

  • Lack of Google Mobile Services (no Play Store, Gmail, or YouTube app)
  • Limited app selection in the Huawei AppGallery compared to competitors
  • Mid-range Kirin 710A processor is relatively slow and struggles with heavy gaming
  • No 3.5mm headphone jack
  • Charging speed is relatively slow at only 22.5W
  • Software can occasionally feel unpolished or buggy with slight animation lag
  • Confusion regarding hardware specs due to multiple variants with similar names

Verdict

The Huawei MatePad 10.4 (2022) WiFi (4GB + 128GB) is a sleek, budget-friendly tablet featuring a 10.4-inch 2K FullView IPS display with a 2000 x 1200 resolution and a 60Hz refresh rate. It is powered by the Kirin 710A octa-core processor and includes a large 7,250mAh battery that supports 22.5W fast charging, alongside a quad-speaker system tuned by Harman Kardon for immersive audio. Main pros include its durable aluminium chassis, excellent battery life capable of over 8 hours of gaming, and a dedicated eBook mode for comfortable reading. However, significant cons include the lack of Google Mobile Services, necessitating the use of Huawei’s AppGallery, and relatively modest performance from its 14nm chipset which may struggle with high-end gaming.

Compare Huawei MatePad 10.4 2022 WiFi (4GB + 128GB) with other tablets

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Huawei MatePad 10.4 2022 WiFi (4GB + 128GB) and other tablets

No results found