OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS
Scored using Tablets Methodology v3.0
Tablets Methodology v3.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontum Tablets Methodology v3.0: the technical score from the specifications is the base, and independent expert and video reviews (up to ±0.5 points), owner opinions (up to ±0.3) and best-of lists (up to +0.3) move it up or down.
Explore Tablets Methodology v3.0

HP Omni 10 LTE (2GB + 32GB) review: 168 specs compared

Avg. price:~£350RAM capacity:2 GBInternal storage:32 GBScreen size:10.1 inchesChipset:Intel Atom Z3770

HP Omni 10 LTE (2GB + 32GB) Review: Compare 168 technical specifications and 12 expert and video reviews to see how this product ranks in the Tablets category and whether it is worth buying.

HP Omni 10 LTE (2GB + 32GB)
6.3/10

Overall score

Score
6.3/ 10
✕
What it is
Our main score for this model, 1–10. It combines specs, best-of lists, expert reviews and owners.
How we count it
Parts: Technical score 35%, List score 30%, Reviews score 25%, Sentiment score 10%
Marks: Each part gets a mark out of 10. For reviews, lists and owners, a typical model in this category gets about 8 and the best one gets 10.
No data yet: A part with no data shows "?". It counts as the mark of a weaker model in this category (4 in 5 models with data score higher). This way, models with reviews, lists and owners usually come out ahead.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▼ Worse than 78% of models
Score components

35%

5.6

Technical score

30%

?

List scoreNot enough data yet, so we use 7.5, the mark of a weaker model in this category

25%

5.6

Reviews score

10%

?

Sentiment scoreNot enough data yet, so we use 6.9, the mark of a weaker model in this category

▼Worse than 78% of tablets
7.0

Value for money

Value for money
7.0/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the tablet's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a tablet with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▼ Worse than 83% of models
Score components

70%

6.3

Overall score

30%

8.7

Price

▼Worse than 83%
5.6

Technical score

Technical score
5.6/ 10
✕
What it is
How good the specs are compared with the other models in this category, 1–10.
How we count it
Areas: We rate the specs in each area against the other models in this category.
Weighting: The areas that matter most to buyers count more. The shares are shown under Score components.
Share: The technical score is 35% of the overall score.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▼ Worse than 69% of models
Score components

22%

5.2

Performance

20%

4.6

Display

16%

6.0

Camera

14%

5.9

Battery

12%

6.3

Connectivity

8%

7.0

Software

5%

4.6

Design

3%

4.8

Audio

▼Worse than 69%
5.6

Reviews score

Reviews score
5.6/ 10
✕
What it is
Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
How we count it
Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves. Big test sites count more, short reviews half as much as full tests. A video review counts half.
Score: The average grade is 80% of the review mark; the number of reviews is the other 20% (1 review = 5, the typical number in this category = 8, the most-reviewed model = 10).
Enough data: With few reviews, the average grade is pulled toward the typical grade of this category. No reviews yet: 7.4 for now.
Share: Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▼ Worse than 77% of models

5.6

Mark 7.7 is below the typical mark 7.8 of this category, so it cannot lift the score above the technical score

80%

7.6

Average grade

20%

7.9

Popularity

Grades by review (12)
9 reviews: 2 with a printed score, 7 estimated from the review. 3 video reviews, each counting half as much as a written test. Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
User ratings collected online are not part of this score.
▼Worse than 77%
?

List score

List score
7.5/ 10
✕
What it is
How often independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers put this model in their best-of lists for this category.
How we count it
Points: The model in the most lists of this category gets 10; the others get 8 to 10 in proportion. In no list yet: 7.5. Lists count 30% of the overall score.
Enough data: Every list counts, even a single one. With fewer than 5 best-of lists in the category, this part is left out.
Lists with this model (0)
Not in any best-of list yet, so this part counts as 7.5. Models in a list get 8 to 10.
Not in any best-of list yet
  • hp-omni-10-2gb-32gb-lte
hp-omni-10-2gb-32gb-lte
Where to buy
    N/A~ £350
Best rankings
Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.

What reviewers say about the HP Omni 10 LTE (2GB + 32GB)

Based on 9 · 4

Reviewers praise the sharp screen and comfortable grip, but dislike the awkward hardware buttons, heavy weight and limited storage.
Praised
Criticised
Pick a topic to see who said what
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of tablet HP Omni 10 LTE (2GB + 32GB)

Technical score
Technical score
5.6/ 10
✕
What it is
How good the specs are compared with the other models in this category, 1–10.
How we count it
Areas: We rate the specs in each area against the other models in this category.
Weighting: The areas that matter most to buyers count more. The shares are shown under Score components.
Share: The technical score is 35% of the overall score.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▼ Worse than 69% of models
Score components:

22%

5.2

Performance

20%

4.6

Display

16%

6.0

Camera

14%

5.9

Battery

12%

6.3

Connectivity

8%

7.0

Software

5%

4.6

Design

3%

4.8

Audio

5.6
Reviews score
5.6
List score
?
Value for money
Value for money
7.0/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the tablet's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a tablet with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▼ Worse than 83% of models
Score components:

70%

6.3

Overall score

30%

8.7

Price

7.0
RAM capacity
2 GB
Market range: <1 GB – >8 GB
This tablet has 2 GB of RAM, which is less than 61.3% of tablets and equal to 15.5% of tablets.
Process node
22 nm
Market range: <4 nm – >40 nm
This tablet is built on a 22 nm process, which is larger than 57.9% of tablets and equal to 7.2% of tablets.
Internal storage
32 GB
Market range: <16 GB – >256 GB
This tablet has 32 GB of internal storage, which is less than 60.9% of tablets and equal to 17.9% of tablets.
Geekbench 6 single-core score
?
Chipset
Intel Atom Z3770
This tablet runs on Intel Atom Z3770, which is less advanced than 77.2% of tablets and equal to 0.3% of tablets.
Show more
What reviewers say
Screen resolution
1920×1200
This tablet has a 1920×1200 screen, which is sharper than 39.1% of tablets and equal to 18.8% of tablets.
Refresh rate
60 Hz
Market range: <60 Hz – >120 Hz
This tablet has a 60 Hz screen, which is smoother than 0.1% of tablets and equal to 73.4% of tablets.
Display type
IPS LCD
This tablet uses a IPS LCD display type. 17% of tablets use this display technology.
Pixel density
224 ppi
Market range: <149 ppi – >291 ppi
This tablet has a pixel density of 224 ppi, which is higher than 50.1% of tablets and equal to 11.5% of tablets.
Display glass type
Corning Gorilla Glass
This tablet protects its screen with Corning Gorilla Glass, which is more durable than 45.4% of tablets and the same as 32.8% of tablets.
Show more
What reviewers say
Optical image stabilization
no
This tablet does not support optical stabilisation. 0.4% of tablets offer this.
Main camera megapixels
8 MP
Market range: <3.15 MP – >13 MP
This tablet has a rear camera with 8 MP resolution, which is higher than 36.4% of tablets and equal to 31.9% of tablets.
Front camera megapixels
2 MP
Market range: <1.2 MP – >9 MP
This tablet has a front camera with 2 MP resolution, which is lower than 53.8% of tablets and equal to 25.5% of tablets.
Main camera aperture
f/2.4
This tablet has a main camera aperture of f/2.4, which is narrower than 70% of tablets and equal to 17.5% of tablets.
Optical zoom
1xxx
This tablet has 1xx optical zoom, which is stronger than 18.2% of tablets and equal to 80.9% of tablets.
Show more
Battery capacity
8,250 mAh
Market range: <4k mAh – >10.1k mAh
This tablet has 8,250 mAh battery capacity, which is larger than 76.4% of tablets and equal to 0.1% of tablets.
Charging speed
18 W
Market range: <10 W – >45 W
This tablet charges at 18 W, which is faster than 48% of tablets and equal to 12.3% of tablets.
Battery life
8.5 hours
Market range: <7 hours – >16 hours
This tablet has a battery life of 8.5 hours, which is shorter than that of 70% of tablets and equal to that of 1.2% of tablets.
Wireless charging
no
This tablet does not support wireless charging. 1.5% of tablets offer this.
Fast charging
yes
This tablet supports fast charging. 43.2% of tablets offer this.
Show more
LTE support
yes
This tablet has built-in LTE. 57.1% of tablets offer this.
Wi-Fi connectivity
yes
This tablet connects to Wi-Fi. 0.2% of tablets offer this.
GPS
no
This tablet does not have built-in GPS. 82.9% of tablets offer this.
5G connectivity
no
This tablet does not support 5G. 8.1% of tablets offer this.
NFC
yes
This tablet includes NFC. 89.3% of tablets offer this.
Show more
What reviewers say
Operating system
Windows
This tablet uses the Windows operating system, which is less advanced than the one used by 84.2%.
Update support duration
long
This tablet offers long update support, which is longer than the support period of 80% of tablets and equal to that of 20% of tablets.
Direct OS updates
yes
This tablet supports direct OS updates. 20.3% of tablets offer this.
On-device AI
no
This tablet does not support on-device AI. 28.3% of tablets support this capability.
App tracking protection
no
This tablet does not support app tracking protection. 28.4% of tablets offer this.
Show more
What reviewers say
IP rating
not rated
This tablet's IP rating is not rated, which is less protected than 16.5% of tablets and the same as 83.6% of tablets.
Weight
652 g
Market range: <315 g – >730 g
This tablet weighs 652 g, which is heavier than 83.7% of tablets and equal to 0.5% of tablets.
Backlit keyboard
no
This tablet does not support a backlit keyboard. 9.7% of tablets support backlit keyboards.
Keyboard accessory
?
Pen latency
N/A
Show more
What reviewers say
Number of microphones
1
Market range: <1 – >3
This tablet has a microphone array of 1, which is more than 0.2% of tablets and equal to 54.8% of tablets.
aptX Adaptive
no
This tablet does not support aptX Adaptive. 6.9% of tablets offer this.
Dolby Atmos support
no
This tablet does not support Dolby Atmos. 31.3% of tablets support Dolby Atmos.
N. of speakers
2
Market range: <2 – >4
This tablet includes 2 speakers, which is more than in 9.8% of tablets and equal to the number in 60.8% of tablets.
FM radio
no
This tablet does not include an FM radio. 19% of tablets offer this.
Show more

HP Omni 10 LTE (2GB + 32GB) vs the average tablet

246810TotalPerformanceDisplayCameraBatteryConnectivitySoftwareDesignAudio
  • Supports LTE
    This tablet supports LTE, while the average tablet does not. 42.9% of tablets support LTE.
  • Longer update support
    This tablet offers longer update support than the average tablet (long vs medium). The average tablet gets medium of update support.
    long vs medium
  • Includes NFC
    This tablet includes NFC, while the average tablet does not. 10.8% of tablets include NFC.
  • 25% larger battery capacity
    This tablet has a larger battery capacity than the average tablet (8,250 mAh vs 6,600 mAh). The average tablet offers 6,600 mAh of battery capacity.
    8,250 mAh vs 6,600 mAh
  • Monitors battery health
    This tablet monitors battery health, while the average tablet does not. 36.7% of tablets monitor battery health.
  • 20% higher CPU speed
    This tablet has a higher CPU speed than the average tablet (2.4 GHz vs 2 GHz). The average tablet has CPU speed of 2 GHz.
    2.4 GHz vs 2 GHz
  • Supports cellular data
    This tablet supports cellular data, while the average tablet does not. 47.4% of tablets offer this.
  • Built-in camera flash
    This tablet has a camera flash, while the average tablet does not. 45.5% of tablets have one.
  • 20% higher CPU speed
    This tablet has a higher CPU speed than the average tablet (2.4 GHz vs 2 GHz). The average tablet has CPU speed of 2 GHz.
    2.4 GHz vs 2 GHz
  • More advanced chipset
    This tablet has a more advanced chipset than the average tablet (Intel Atom Z3770 vs MediaTek MT8169A).
    Intel Atom Z3770 vs MediaTek MT8169A
  • Built-in camera flash
    This tablet has a camera flash, while the average tablet does not. 45.5% of tablets have one.
  • 25% larger battery capacity
    This tablet has a larger battery capacity than the average tablet (8,250 mAh vs 6,600 mAh). The average tablet offers 6,600 mAh of battery capacity.
    8,250 mAh vs 6,600 mAh
  • Monitors battery health
    This tablet monitors battery health, while the average tablet does not. 36.7% of tablets monitor battery health.
  • Supports LTE
    This tablet supports LTE, while the average tablet does not. 42.9% of tablets support LTE.
  • Includes NFC
    This tablet includes NFC, while the average tablet does not. 10.8% of tablets include NFC.
  • Supports cellular data
    This tablet supports cellular data, while the average tablet does not. 47.4% of tablets offer this.
  • Supports HDMI output
    This tablet supports HDMI output, while the average tablet does not. 49.8% of tablets offer this.
  • Longer update support
    This tablet offers longer update support than the average tablet (long vs medium). The average tablet gets medium of update support.
    long vs medium
  • No USB-C port
    This tablet does not have a USB Type-C port, while the average tablet does. 54% of tablets have one.
  • 4 fewer CPU threads
    This tablet has fewer CPU threads than the average tablet (4 vs 8). The average tablet has 8 CPU threads.
    4 vs 8
  • 3 MP lower front resolution
    This tablet has a lower-resolution front camera than the average tablet (2 MP vs 5 MP). The average tablet has a front camera of 5 MP.
    2 MP vs 5 MP
  • Less advanced operating system
    This tablet runs on a less advanced operating system than the average tablet (Windows vs Android). Operating system choice shapes app support, updates, and ecosystem features.
    Windows vs Android
  • 20.0% lower review score
    Reviews score
    5.6/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
    How we count it
    Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves. Big test sites count more, short reviews half as much as full tests. A video review counts half.
    Score: The average grade is 80% of the review mark; the number of reviews is the other 20% (1 review = 5, the typical number in this category = 8, the most-reviewed model = 10).
    Enough data: With few reviews, the average grade is pulled toward the typical grade of this category. No reviews yet: 7.4 for now.
    Share: Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
    Score distribution
    ▼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    ▼ Worse than 77% of models

    5.6

    Mark 7.7 is below the typical mark 7.8 of this category, so it cannot lift the score above the technical score

    80%

    7.6

    Average grade

    20%

    7.9

    Popularity

    Grades by review (12)
    9 reviews: 2 with a printed score, 7 estimated from the review. 3 video reviews, each counting half as much as a written test. Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
    User ratings collected online are not part of this score.
    5.6 vs 7.0
  • 94 nits dimmer screen
    This tablet is dimmer than the average tablet (307 nits vs 401 nits). The average tablet reaches 401 nits.
    307 nits vs 401 nits
  • Older Wi-Fi standard
    This tablet has an older Wi-Fi standard than the average tablet (Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n) vs Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac)).
    Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n) vs Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac)
  • 2 GB less RAM
    This tablet has less RAM than the average tablet (2 GB vs 4 GB). The average tablet has 4 GB of RAM.
    2 GB vs 4 GB
  • 20.0% lower review score
    Reviews score
    5.6/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
    How we count it
    Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves. Big test sites count more, short reviews half as much as full tests. A video review counts half.
    Score: The average grade is 80% of the review mark; the number of reviews is the other 20% (1 review = 5, the typical number in this category = 8, the most-reviewed model = 10).
    Enough data: With few reviews, the average grade is pulled toward the typical grade of this category. No reviews yet: 7.4 for now.
    Share: Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
    Score distribution
    ▼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    ▼ Worse than 77% of models

    5.6

    Mark 7.7 is below the typical mark 7.8 of this category, so it cannot lift the score above the technical score

    80%

    7.6

    Average grade

    20%

    7.9

    Popularity

    Grades by review (12)
    9 reviews: 2 with a printed score, 7 estimated from the review. 3 video reviews, each counting half as much as a written test. Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
    User ratings collected online are not part of this score.
    5.6 vs 7.0
  • 8% worse value for money
    HP Omni 10 LTE (2GB + 32GB) has worse value for money than the average tablet (6.99 vs 7.6).
    6.99 vs 7.55
  • 34.6% more expensive
    HP Omni 10 LTE (2GB + 32GB) is more expensive than the average tablet (£350 vs £260).
    £350 vs £260
  • 4 fewer CPU threads
    This tablet has fewer CPU threads than the average tablet (4 vs 8). The average tablet has 8 CPU threads.
    4 vs 8
  • 2 GB less RAM
    This tablet has less RAM than the average tablet (2 GB vs 4 GB). The average tablet has 4 GB of RAM.
    2 GB vs 4 GB
  • No big.LITTLE architecture
    This tablet does not support big.LITTLE architecture, while the average tablet does. 51.7% of tablets support big.LITTLE architecture.
  • 52.2% slower GPU clock
    This tablet runs its GPU slower than the average tablet (311 MHz vs 650 MHz). The average tablet runs its GPU at 650 MHz.
    311 MHz vs 650 MHz
  • 50% less internal storage
    This tablet has less internal storage than the average tablet (32 GB vs 64 GB). The average tablet has 64 GB of internal storage.
    32 GB vs 64 GB
  • 6 years older
    This tablet was released earlier than the average tablet (2013 vs 2019). The average tablet was released in 2019.
    December 2013
    2013 vs 2019
  • 57.1% larger process node
    This tablet has a larger process node than the average tablet (22 nm vs 14 nm). The average tablet is built on 14 nm.
    22 nm vs 14 nm
  • More basic graphics
    This tablet has less advanced graphics than the average tablet (Intel HD Graphics vs Mali-G51).
    Intel HD Graphics vs Mali-G51
  • 266 MHz slower RAM speed
    This tablet has a lower RAM speed than the average tablet (1,600 MHz vs 1,866 MHz). The average tablet has RAM speed of 1,866 MHz.
    1,600 MHz vs 1,866 MHz
  • 94 nits dimmer screen
    This tablet is dimmer than the average tablet (307 nits vs 401 nits). The average tablet reaches 401 nits.
    307 nits vs 401 nits
  • 93 nits lower typical brightness
    This tablet has a lower typical brightness than the average tablet (307 nits vs 400 nits). The average tablet reaches 400 nits typical brightness.
    307 nits vs 400 nits
  • Less vivid contrast
    This tablet has less contrast than the average tablet (667:1 vs 1015:1). The average tablet has a contrast ratio of 1015:1.
    667:1 vs 1,015:1
  • 3 MP lower front resolution
    This tablet has a lower-resolution front camera than the average tablet (2 MP vs 5 MP). The average tablet has a front camera of 5 MP.
    2 MP vs 5 MP
  • No manual exposure control
    This tablet does not support manual exposure, while the average tablet does. 63.6% of tablets support manual exposure.
  • No HDR photo mode
    This tablet does not have HDR photo mode, the average tablet does. 79.8% of tablets support HDR photo mode.
  • No backside-illuminated sensor
    This tablet does not have a BSI sensor, while the average tablet does. 52.6% of tablets have a BSI sensor.
  • Narrower main camera aperture
    This tablet has a narrower main camera aperture than the average tablet (f/2.4 vs f/2.2). The average tablet's main camera aperture is f/2.2.
    f/2.4 vs f/2.2
  • 1.5 hours shorter battery life
    This tablet offers shorter battery life than the average tablet (8.5 hours vs 10 hours). The average tablet offers 10 hours of battery life.
    8.5 hours vs 10 hours
  • No USB-C port
    This tablet does not have a USB Type-C port, while the average tablet does. 54% of tablets have one.
  • Older Wi-Fi standard
    This tablet has an older Wi-Fi standard than the average tablet (Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n) vs Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac)).
    Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n) vs Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac)
  • No GPS
    This tablet does not include GPS, while the average tablet does. 82.9% of tablets include GPS.
  • Older Bluetooth version
    This tablet has an older Bluetooth version than the average tablet (4 vs 5).
    4 vs 5
  • No face recognition
    This tablet does not have face recognition, the average tablet does. 56.4% of tablets support face recognition.
  • Less advanced operating system
    This tablet runs on a less advanced operating system than the average tablet (Windows vs Android). Operating system choice shapes app support, updates, and ecosystem features.
    Windows vs Android
  • No split-screen
    This tablet does not support split-screen, the average tablet does. 72.8% of tablets support split-screen.
  • No picture-in-picture mode
    This tablet does not support picture-in-picture, the average tablet does. 61.4% of tablets support picture-in-picture.
  • No camera and mic privacy
    This tablet does not support camera and mic privacy, while the average tablet does. 56.6% of tablets offer this.
  • No full-page screenshots
    This tablet does not support full-page screenshots, the average tablet does. 53% of tablets support full-page screenshots.
  • No dark mode
    This tablet does not support dark mode, while the average tablet does. 57.7% of tablets offer this.
  • 33.1% heavier
    This tablet is heavier than the average tablet (652 g vs 490 g). The average tablet weighs 490 g.
    652 g vs 490 g
  • 1.9 mm thicker
    This tablet is thicker than the average tablet (9.9 mm vs 8 mm). The average tablet is 8 mm thick.
    9.9 mm vs 8 mm
  • 84.3 mm wider
    This tablet is wider than the average tablet (259.6 mm vs 175.3 mm). The average tablet is 175.3 mm wide.
    259.6 mm vs 175.3 mm

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

9.0
Damir Franc
≈ estimated
24/12/2013
Hands-on review · daily use, browser and desktop tests
Verdict
HP Omni 10 LTE is great value for a Windows tablet, but its 2 GB of RAM limits heavy multitasking.
7.0
TechVideo
≈ estimated
15/12/2013
Hands-on look · hardware, ports and camera
Verdict
HP Omni 10 LTE is a more professional Windows device with solid hardware, but its camera is slow and it charges only through the dock.
8.0
GadgetsToUse
≈ estimated
07/03/2014
First look · ports, build and screen overview
Verdict
HP Omni 10 LTE is praised for its build, screen and ability to work as a full Windows PC.
8.0
Techniqued
≈ estimated
15/02/2014
Hands-on first look · hardware, build and screen
Verdict
HP Omni 10 LTE looks very good overall, with solid build quality and a good screen.
Not graded
Hands-on video, no verdict
Hands-on video, no verdict

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

6.0
cnet.com
≈ estimated
19/09/2013
Hands-on test · Windows 8.1 tablet
Verdict
The HP Omni 10 is a plain but solid Windows 8.1 tablet with a bright, quick screen, best for buyers who want simplicity over standout features.
7.0
gadgetsnow.indiatimes.com
✓ explicit
17/04/2018
Hands-on test · Windows 8.1 tablet
Verdict
The HP Omni 10 is a budget way into full Windows 8.1 on a tablet, best for people who need specific Windows apps rather than casual iPad-style use.
7.0
m.economictimes.com
≈ estimated
16/06/2014
Hands-on test · Light Windows tablet
Verdict
The HP Omni 10 is a light, silent Windows tablet that handles web, video and light games well, but needs extra accessories for real work.
7.0
pcwelt.de
≈ estimated
04/03/2014
Hands-on test · Windows tablet
Verdict
The HP Omni 10 is a smooth, solidly built Windows tablet with Office included, but its dim screen and heavy weight make it a poor choice on the go.
8.1
notebookcheck.com
✓ explicit
05/01/2014
Lab test · Windows tablet
Verdict
The HP Omni 10 is a quick, light Windows 8.1 tablet with Office included, though its 32 GB storage and cramped ports make it awkward as a desk computer.
9.0
cachem.fr
≈ estimated
04/08/2014
Hands-on test · Windows 8.1 tablet
Verdict
The HP Omni 10 is a well-finished Windows 8.1 tablet with a sharp screen and Office included, held back by tight storage and a non-standard charger.
8.0
roxarmy.com
≈ estimated
18/02/2014
Hands-on test · Multimedia and office
Verdict
The HP Omni 10 is a good all-rounder for video and office work, running real Windows programs well, though its tinny speakers and forced Microsoft account are drawbacks.
7.0
xatakawindows.com
≈ estimated
27/02/2014
Full review · Windows 8.1 tablet
Verdict
The HP Omni 10 is a solid, sharp-screened Windows tablet that lasts a full day, but its bottom-edge ports, tight 32 GB storage and weight hold it back.
8.0
tuexperto.com
≈ estimated
21/03/2014
Hands-on test · Windows 8.1 tablet
Verdict
The HP Omni 10 is a well-balanced Windows 8.1 tablet with a wide-angle Full HD screen and loud speakers, but its weight and clumsy Windows button are drawbacks.

Third-party reviews

What customers like about HP Omni 10 LTE (2GB + 32GB)

  • Razor-sharp 1920x1200 resolution IPS display with excellent viewing angles
  • Smooth performance in daily tasks and multitasking thanks to the quad-core Intel Bay Trail processor
  • Premium build quality with a comfortable, grippy matte/rubber finish
  • Full Windows 8.1 support allowing for desktop applications rather than just mobile apps
  • High-density 8MP rear camera compared to other tablets in its price bracket
  • Excellent value for money, often compared to a 'poor man’s Surface Pro'

What customers don't like about HP Omni 10 LTE (2GB + 32GB)

  • Limited internal storage (32GB) with very little free space available after Windows updates
  • Extreme lack of official HP accessories such as keyboard docks or dedicated cases
  • Capacitive Windows home button is often reported as unresponsive or requiring multiple taps
  • Absence of a full-sized USB port, requiring the use of OTG cables for most peripherals
  • Reports of touch screen unresponsiveness or hardware failures over long-term use
  • Lack of standard USB charging, requiring a proprietary DC power brick

Verdict

The HP Omni 10 is a 10.1-inch Windows 8.1 tablet featuring a high-resolution 1920x1200 IPS display and a quad-core Intel Atom Z3770 processor. This specific model includes 2GB of RAM, 32GB of internal storage (expandable via microSD), and supports LTE connectivity for on-the-go data access. Main pros include its sharp, vibrant screen with excellent viewing angles, the ability to run full desktop Windows applications, and a solid build quality with a comfortable, grippy back. However, notable cons include limited available internal storage due to the large OS footprint, a lack of a full-sized USB port requiring adapters for most peripherals, and a capacitive home button that can sometimes be unresponsive to touch.

Compare HP Omni 10 LTE (2GB + 32GB) with other tablets

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of HP Omni 10 LTE (2GB + 32GB) and other tablets

No results found