OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS
Scored using Tablets Methodology v3.0
Tablets Methodology v3.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontum Tablets Methodology v3.0: the technical score from the specifications is the base, and independent expert and video reviews (up to ±0.5 points), owner opinions (up to ±0.3) and best-of lists (up to +0.3) move it up or down.
Explore Tablets Methodology v3.0

HP Envy x2 4G (4GB + 64GB) review: 168 specs compared

Avg. price:~£790RAM capacity:4 GBInternal storage:64 GBScreen size:11.6 inchesChipset:Qualcomm Snapdragon 835

HP Envy x2 4G (4GB + 64GB) Review: Compare 168 technical specifications and 21 expert and video reviews to see how this product ranks in the Tablets category and whether it is worth buying.

7.4/10

Overall score

Score
7.4/ 10
✕
What it is
Our main score for this model, 1–10. It combines specs, best-of lists, expert reviews and owners.
How we count it
Parts: Technical score 35%, List score 30%, Reviews score 25%, Sentiment score 10%
Marks: Each part gets a mark out of 10. For reviews, lists and owners, a typical model in this category gets about 8 and the best one gets 10.
No data yet: A part with no data shows "?". It counts as the mark of a weaker model in this category (4 in 5 models with data score higher). This way, models with reviews, lists and owners usually come out ahead.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 66% of models
Score components

35%

7.4

Technical score

30%

?

List scoreNot enough data yet, so we use 7.5, the mark of a weaker model in this category

25%

7.1

Reviews score

10%

7.4

Sentiment score

â–²Better than 66% of tablets
7.1

Value for money

Value for money
7.1/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the tablet's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a tablet with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 78% of models
Score components

70%

7.4

Overall score

30%

6.3

Price

â–¼Worse than 78%
7.4

Technical score

Technical score
7.4/ 10
✕
What it is
How good the specs are compared with the other models in this category, 1–10.
How we count it
Areas: We rate the specs in each area against the other models in this category.
Weighting: The areas that matter most to buyers count more. The shares are shown under Score components.
Share: The technical score is 35% of the overall score.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 76% of models
Score components

22%

7.1

Performance

20%

6.3

Display

16%

7.0

Camera

14%

9.1

Battery

12%

8.1

Connectivity

8%

8.8

Software

5%

6.5

Design

3%

5.7

Audio

â–²Better than 76%
7.1

Reviews score

Reviews score
7.1/ 10
✕
What it is
Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
How we count it
Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves. Big test sites count more, short reviews half as much as full tests. A video review counts half.
Score: The average grade is 80% of the review mark; the number of reviews is the other 20% (1 review = 5, the typical number in this category = 8, the most-reviewed model = 10).
Enough data: With few reviews, the average grade is pulled toward the typical grade of this category. No reviews yet: 7.4 for now.
Share: Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 57% of models

80%

6.8

Average grade

20%

8.4

Popularity

Grades by review (21)
14 reviews: 9 with a printed score, 5 estimated from the review. 7 video reviews, each counting half as much as a written test. Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
User ratings collected online are not part of this score.
â–¼Worse than 57%
?

List score

List score
7.5/ 10
✕
What it is
How often independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers put this model in their best-of lists for this category.
How we count it
Points: The model in the most lists of this category gets 10; the others get 8 to 10 in proportion. In no list yet: 7.5. Lists count 30% of the overall score.
Enough data: Every list counts, even a single one. With fewer than 5 best-of lists in the category, this part is left out.
Lists with this model (0)
Not in any best-of list yet, so this part counts as 7.5. Models in a list get 8 to 10.
Not in any best-of list yet
  • No image
No image
Where to buy
    N/A~ £790
Best rankings
Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.

What reviewers say about the HP Envy x2 4G (4GB + 64GB)

Based on 14 · 8

Reviewers praise reliable mobile connectivity and long battery life, but complain about poor app compatibility and sluggish performance.
Praised
Mixed views
Criticised
Pick a topic to see who said what

What owners say about the HP Envy x2 4G (4GB + 64GB)

Based on 93 owners sharing their experience in online comments

48%positive8%mixed44%negative

Owners value its long battery life and display, though sluggish performance and reliability problems hold it back.

What owners dislike

  • Owners report apps taking ages to launch, stuttering video at 60fps, dropped frames when scrolling, and lag when dragging windows or typing.11
  • Several owners report the keyboard stopping, with no lights or power to the dock, and needing a warranty replacement.8
  • Reset can freeze on a black screen at Preparing repair, and the tablet may not boot Windows or Linux live USBs.7
  • Owners report screens cracking from a knock and some touchscreens arriving broken, while one replacement worked perfectly.5
  • Some tablets show a light but will not start, the power button may stick down, and hard resets did not help.5
  • The touchpad clicks can stop working or fire the wrong button, and the cursor may freeze at times.4
  • The tablet can crash after a few hours with an SDBUS internal error, and only a full power-off fixes it.4
  • Owners report Wi-Fi that is much slower than other tablets and repeatedly shows limited access.3
  • Owners who lost or broke the charger struggled to find the exact replacement, as stores rarely stock it.3
  • Owners say HP support took hours of online troubleshooting and over a week to ship a replacement keyboard.3

Points mentioned by at least 3 owners, most mentioned first.

Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of tablet HP Envy x2 4G (4GB + 64GB)

Technical score
Technical score
7.4/ 10
✕
What it is
How good the specs are compared with the other models in this category, 1–10.
How we count it
Areas: We rate the specs in each area against the other models in this category.
Weighting: The areas that matter most to buyers count more. The shares are shown under Score components.
Share: The technical score is 35% of the overall score.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 76% of models
Score components:

22%

7.1

Performance

20%

6.3

Display

16%

7.0

Camera

14%

9.1

Battery

12%

8.1

Connectivity

8%

8.8

Software

5%

6.5

Design

3%

5.7

Audio

7.4
Reviews score
7.1
List score
?
Value for money
Value for money
7.1/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the tablet's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a tablet with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 78% of models
Score components:

70%

7.4

Overall score

30%

6.3

Price

7.1
RAM capacity
4 GB
Market range: <1 GB – >8 GB
This tablet has 4 GB of RAM, which is more than 47.2% of tablets and equal to 17.8% of tablets.
Process node
10 nm
Market range: <4 nm – >40 nm
This tablet is built on a 10 nm process, which is smaller than 67.8% of tablets and equal to 1.4% of tablets.
Internal storage
64 GB
Market range: <16 GB – >256 GB
This tablet has 64 GB of internal storage, which is more than 39.1% of tablets and equal to 17% of tablets.
Geekbench 6 single-core score
?
Chipset
Qualcomm Snapdragon 835
This tablet runs on Qualcomm Snapdragon 835, which is more advanced than 66.3% of tablets and equal to 0.3% of tablets.
Show more
What reviewers say
Screen resolution
1920×1280
This tablet has a 1920×1280 screen, which is sharper than 66.2% of tablets and equal to 1.1% of tablets.
Refresh rate
60 Hz
Market range: <60 Hz – >120 Hz
This tablet has a 60 Hz screen, which is smoother than 0.1% of tablets and equal to 73.4% of tablets.
Display type
IPS LCD
This tablet uses a IPS LCD display type. 17% of tablets use this display technology.
Pixel density
188 ppi
Market range: <149 ppi – >291 ppi
This tablet has a pixel density of 188 ppi, which is lower than 73.3% of tablets and equal to 0.6% of tablets.
Display glass type
Corning Gorilla Glass 4
This tablet protects its screen with Corning Gorilla Glass 4, which is more durable than 91.4% of tablets and the same as 2.4% of tablets.
Show more
What reviewers say
Optical image stabilization
no
This tablet does not support optical stabilisation. 0.4% of tablets offer this.
Main camera megapixels
13 MP
Market range: <3.15 MP – >13 MP
This tablet has a rear camera with 13 MP resolution, which is higher than 73.9% of tablets and equal to 21.7% of tablets.
Front camera megapixels
5 MP
Market range: <1.2 MP – >9 MP
This tablet has a front camera with 5 MP resolution, which is higher than 48.6% of tablets and equal to 19.7% of tablets.
Main camera aperture
?
Optical zoom
1xxx
This tablet has 1xx optical zoom, which is stronger than 18.2% of tablets and equal to 80.9% of tablets.
Show more
Battery capacity
?
Charging speed
45 W
Market range: <10 W – >45 W
This tablet charges at 45 W, which is faster than 83.8% of tablets and equal to 6.7% of tablets.
Battery life
20 hours
Market range: <7 hours – >16 hours
This tablet has a battery life of 20 hours, which is longer than that of 95.8% of tablets and equal to that of 1.4% of tablets.
Wireless charging
no
This tablet does not support wireless charging. 1.5% of tablets offer this.
Fast charging
yes
This tablet supports fast charging. 43.2% of tablets offer this.
Show more
What reviewers say
LTE support
yes
This tablet has built-in LTE. 57.1% of tablets offer this.
Wi-Fi connectivity
yes
This tablet connects to Wi-Fi. 0.2% of tablets offer this.
GPS
yes
This tablet has built-in GPS. 17.1% of tablets offer this.
5G connectivity
no
This tablet does not support 5G. 8.1% of tablets offer this.
NFC
yes
This tablet includes NFC. 89.3% of tablets offer this.
Show more
What reviewers say
Operating system
Windows
This tablet uses the Windows operating system, which is less advanced than the one used by 84.2%.
Update support duration
long
This tablet offers long update support, which is longer than the support period of 80% of tablets and equal to that of 20% of tablets.
Direct OS updates
yes
This tablet supports direct OS updates. 20.3% of tablets offer this.
On-device AI
no
This tablet does not support on-device AI. 28.3% of tablets support this capability.
App tracking protection
yes
This tablet supports app tracking protection. 71.6% of tablets offer this.
Show more
What reviewers say
IP rating
not rated
This tablet's IP rating is not rated, which is less protected than 16.5% of tablets and the same as 83.6% of tablets.
Weight
700 g
Market range: <315 g – >730 g
This tablet weighs 700 g, which is heavier than 88.3% of tablets and equal to 0.3% of tablets.
Backlit keyboard
no
This tablet does not support a backlit keyboard. 9.7% of tablets support backlit keyboards.
Keyboard accessory
yes
This tablet supports a keyboard accessory. 15.8% of tablets support this option.
Pen latency
?
Show more
What reviewers say
Number of microphones
2
Market range: <1 – >3
This tablet has a microphone array of 2, which is more than 55.1% of tablets and equal to 32.7% of tablets.
aptX Adaptive
no
This tablet does not support aptX Adaptive. 6.9% of tablets offer this.
Dolby Atmos support
no
This tablet does not support Dolby Atmos. 31.3% of tablets support Dolby Atmos.
N. of speakers
2
Market range: <2 – >4
This tablet includes 2 speakers, which is more than in 9.8% of tablets and equal to the number in 60.8% of tablets.
FM radio
no
This tablet does not include an FM radio. 19% of tablets offer this.
Show more

HP Envy x2 4G (4GB + 64GB) vs the average tablet

246810TotalPerformanceDisplayCameraBatteryConnectivitySoftwareDesignAudio
  • 10 hours longer battery life
    This tablet offers longer battery life than the average tablet (20 hours vs 10 hours). The average tablet offers 10 hours of battery life.
    20 hours vs 10 hours
  • More advanced chipset
    This tablet has a more advanced chipset than the average tablet (Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 vs MediaTek MT8169A).
    Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 vs MediaTek MT8169A
  • 2.5x faster charging
    This tablet charges faster than the average tablet (45 W vs 18 W). The average tablet charges at 18 W.
    45 W vs 18 W
  • 5 MP higher rear resolution
    This tablet has a higher-resolution rear camera than the average tablet (13 MP vs 8 MP). The average tablet has a rear camera of 8 MP.
    13 MP vs 8 MP
  • More advanced graphics
    This tablet has more advanced graphics than the average tablet (Adreno 540 vs Mali-G51).
    Adreno 540 vs Mali-G51
  • 1.5 inches larger screen
    This tablet has a larger screen than the average tablet (11.6 inches vs 10.1 inches). The average tablet measures 10.1 inches.
    11.6 inches vs 10.1 inches
  • Faster storage type
    This tablet uses SSD storage, while the average tablet uses eMMC. Storage technology still varies widely across tablets.
    SSD vs eMMC
  • 30% higher CPU speed
    This tablet has a higher CPU speed than the average tablet (2.6 GHz vs 2 GHz). The average tablet has CPU speed of 2 GHz.
    2.6 GHz vs 2 GHz
  • More advanced chipset
    This tablet has a more advanced chipset than the average tablet (Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 vs MediaTek MT8169A).
    Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 vs MediaTek MT8169A
  • More advanced graphics
    This tablet has more advanced graphics than the average tablet (Adreno 540 vs Mali-G51).
    Adreno 540 vs Mali-G51
  • Faster storage type
    This tablet uses SSD storage, while the average tablet uses eMMC. Storage technology still varies widely across tablets.
    SSD vs eMMC
  • 30% higher CPU speed
    This tablet has a higher CPU speed than the average tablet (2.6 GHz vs 2 GHz). The average tablet has CPU speed of 2 GHz.
    2.6 GHz vs 2 GHz
  • 1,867 MHz faster RAM speed
    This tablet has a higher RAM speed than the average tablet (3,733 MHz vs 1,866 MHz). The average tablet has RAM speed of 1,866 MHz.
    3,733 MHz vs 1,866 MHz
  • More advanced memory type
    This tablet uses more advanced memory than the average tablet (LPDDR4X vs LPDDR3).
    LPDDR4X vs LPDDR3
  • 2x more memory bandwidth
    This tablet has more memory bandwidth than the average tablet (29.8 GB/s vs 14.9 GB/s). The average tablet has 14.9 GB/s of memory bandwidth.
    29.8 GB/s vs 14.9 GB/s
  • 28.6% smaller process node
    This tablet has a smaller process node than the average tablet (10 nm vs 14 nm). The average tablet is built on 14 nm.
    10 nm vs 14 nm
  • 1.5 inches larger screen
    This tablet has a larger screen than the average tablet (11.6 inches vs 10.1 inches). The average tablet measures 10.1 inches.
    11.6 inches vs 10.1 inches
  • More vivid contrast
    This tablet has more contrast than the average tablet (1540:1 vs 1015:1). The average tablet has a contrast ratio of 1015:1.
    1,540:1 vs 1,015:1
  • Includes anti-reflection coating
    This tablet has anti-reflection coating, the average tablet does not. 24.6% of tablets use anti-reflection coating.
  • More durable glass
    This tablet has more durable glass than the average tablet (Corning Gorilla Glass 4 vs Corning Gorilla Glass). The average tablet uses Corning Gorilla Glass.
    Corning Gorilla Glass 4 vs Corning Gorilla Glass
  • 85 nits brighter screen
    This tablet is brighter than the average tablet (486 nits vs 401 nits). The average tablet reaches 401 nits.
    486 nits vs 401 nits
  • Sharper display
    This tablet has a sharper screen than the average tablet (1920×1280 vs 1920×1200).
    1,920×1,280 vs 1,920×1,200
  • 5 MP higher rear resolution
    This tablet has a higher-resolution rear camera than the average tablet (13 MP vs 8 MP). The average tablet has a rear camera of 8 MP.
    13 MP vs 8 MP
  • Built-in camera flash
    This tablet has a camera flash, while the average tablet does not. 45.5% of tablets have one.
  • 10 hours longer battery life
    This tablet offers longer battery life than the average tablet (20 hours vs 10 hours). The average tablet offers 10 hours of battery life.
    20 hours vs 10 hours
  • 2.5x faster charging
    This tablet charges faster than the average tablet (45 W vs 18 W). The average tablet charges at 18 W.
    45 W vs 18 W
  • Monitors battery health
    This tablet monitors battery health, while the average tablet does not. 36.7% of tablets monitor battery health.
  • Supports DisplayPort over USB-C
    This tablet supports DisplayPort over USB-C, the average tablet does not. 21.3% of tablets support DisplayPort over USB-C.
  • Supports LTE
    This tablet supports LTE, while the average tablet does not. 42.9% of tablets support LTE.
  • Supports eSIM
    This tablet supports eSIM, the average tablet does not. 11.3% of tablets support eSIM.
  • Includes NFC
    This tablet includes NFC, while the average tablet does not. 10.8% of tablets include NFC.
  • Supports cellular data
    This tablet supports cellular data, while the average tablet does not. 47.4% of tablets offer this.
  • Supports HDMI output
    This tablet supports HDMI output, while the average tablet does not. 49.8% of tablets offer this.
  • Longer update support
    This tablet offers longer update support than the average tablet (long vs medium). The average tablet gets medium of update support.
    long vs medium
  • Supports live text recognition
    This tablet supports live text recognition, while the average tablet does not. 35.1% of tablets offer this.
  • Supports app tracking protection
    This tablet supports app tracking protection, while the average tablet does not. 28.4% of tablets offer this.
  • Stylus included
    This tablet includes a stylus, while the average tablet does not. 17.2% of tablets offer this.
  • Supports drawing
    This tablet is suitable for drawing, while the average tablet is not. 40% of tablets are suitable for drawing.
  • Supports stylus tilt
    This tablet supports stylus tilt, the average tablet does not. 33.5% of tablets support stylus tilt.
  • 1.1 mm thinner
    This tablet is thinner than the average tablet (6.9 mm vs 8 mm). The average tablet is 8 mm thick.
    6.9 mm vs 8 mm
  • 1 more microphones
    This tablet has more microphones than the average tablet (2 vs 1). The average tablet's microphone count is 1.
    2 vs 1
  • 4 fewer CPU threads
    This tablet has fewer CPU threads than the average tablet (4 vs 8). The average tablet has 8 CPU threads.
    4 vs 8
  • Less advanced operating system
    This tablet runs on a less advanced operating system than the average tablet (Windows vs Android). Operating system choice shapes app support, updates, and ecosystem features.
    Windows vs Android
  • Older Wi-Fi standard
    This tablet has an older Wi-Fi standard than the average tablet (Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n) vs Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac)).
    Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n) vs Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac)
  • 42.9% heavier
    This tablet is heavier than the average tablet (700 g vs 490 g). The average tablet weighs 490 g.
    700 g vs 490 g
  • No HDR photo mode
    This tablet does not have HDR photo mode, the average tablet does. 79.8% of tablets support HDR photo mode.
  • No manual white balance
    This tablet does not support manual white balance, while the average tablet does. 51.5% of tablets support manual white balance.
  • 14.9% softer screen detail
    This tablet has softer screen detail than the average tablet (188 ppi vs 221 ppi). The average tablet has a pixel density of 221 ppi.
    188 ppi vs 221 ppi
  • No panorama mode
    This tablet does not support panorama mode, while the average tablet does. 78.6% of tablets support panorama mode.
  • 3.04x more expensive
    HP Envy x2 4G (4GB + 64GB) is more expensive than the average tablet (£790 vs £260).
    £790 vs £260
  • 7% worse value for money
    HP Envy x2 4G (4GB + 64GB) has worse value for money than the average tablet (7.06 vs 7.6).
    7.06 vs 7.55
  • 4 fewer CPU threads
    This tablet has fewer CPU threads than the average tablet (4 vs 8). The average tablet has 8 CPU threads.
    4 vs 8
  • 14.9% softer screen detail
    This tablet has softer screen detail than the average tablet (188 ppi vs 221 ppi). The average tablet has a pixel density of 221 ppi.
    188 ppi vs 221 ppi
  • No HDR photo mode
    This tablet does not have HDR photo mode, the average tablet does. 79.8% of tablets support HDR photo mode.
  • No manual white balance
    This tablet does not support manual white balance, while the average tablet does. 51.5% of tablets support manual white balance.
  • No panorama mode
    This tablet does not support panorama mode, while the average tablet does. 78.6% of tablets support panorama mode.
  • Older Wi-Fi standard
    This tablet has an older Wi-Fi standard than the average tablet (Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n) vs Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac)).
    Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n) vs Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac)
  • Less advanced operating system
    This tablet runs on a less advanced operating system than the average tablet (Windows vs Android). Operating system choice shapes app support, updates, and ecosystem features.
    Windows vs Android
  • No full-page screenshots
    This tablet does not support full-page screenshots, the average tablet does. 53% of tablets support full-page screenshots.
  • 42.9% heavier
    This tablet is heavier than the average tablet (700 g vs 490 g). The average tablet weighs 490 g.
    700 g vs 490 g
  • 117.7 mm wider
    This tablet is wider than the average tablet (293 mm vs 175.3 mm). The average tablet is 175.3 mm wide.
    293 mm vs 175.3 mm

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

8.0
Windows Central
≈ estimated
18/05/2018
Hands-on review · two weeks of daily use
Verdict
HP Envy x2 4G is a premium Windows tablet best for light productivity, but it is weak for games and Win32 apps.
7.5
Andrew Marc David
✓ explicit
15/04/2018
Long-term test · three weeks as daily driver
Verdict
HP Envy x2 4G has great battery life, but lackluster performance means it isn't ready for demanding work yet.
4.0
Hardware Unboxed
≈ estimated
08/04/2018
Hands-on review · performance, battery and price
Verdict
HP Envy x2 4G is not recommended at this price: battery life is excellent, but the weak processor does not justify it.
8.0
Andrew Marc David
≈ estimated
18/03/2018
First look · unboxing and early impressions
Verdict
HP Envy x2 4G: early impressions point to excellent battery life and adequate performance, but more testing is needed.
Not graded
Overview video
Overview video
Hands-on video, no verdict
Overview video
Overview video
Not graded
Brand video

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

6.0
techadvisor.com
✓ explicit
10/05/2018
Hands-on review · Windows 2-in-1
Verdict
The HP Envy x2 suits mobile workers with its long battery life and built-in 4G, but slow performance and Windows 10 S hold it back.
4.0
techradar.com
✓ explicit
27/07/2018
Hands-on test · Always-on 2-in-1
Verdict
The HP Envy x2 offers strong battery life and built-in 4G in a light design, but its underpowered chip and high price make it hard to recommend.
8.0
expertreviews.co.uk
✓ explicit
24/07/2018
Hands-on review · Snapdragon 2-in-1
Verdict
The HP Envy x2 is a well-built tablet with a bright screen and excellent battery life, but its Snapdragon chip struggles with full Windows apps.
8.0
t3.com
✓ explicit
14/11/2018
Hands-on review · Windows 2-in-1
Verdict
The HP Envy x2 is a stylish premium 2-in-1 with long battery life and 4G, but Windows 10 S and its Snapdragon chip may frustrate power users.
4.0
thurrott.com
≈ estimated
25/04/2018
Hands-on review · Windows on ARM
Verdict
The HP Envy x2 is a thin, attractive tablet with always-on connectivity, but slow performance and limited app compatibility make it a poor choice for typical PC users.
7.0
laptopmag.com
✓ explicit
16/04/2018
Lab test · Windows on ARM
Verdict
The HP Envy x2 lasts over 14 hours on Wi-Fi and has built-in 4G, but lag limits it to light web browsing and Store apps.
6.0
stuff.tv
✓ explicit
30/05/2018
Hands-on review · Snapdragon 2-in-1
Verdict
The HP Envy x2 is a slim, bright hybrid with nearly 19 hours of battery life in light use, but its Snapdragon chip is too slow for serious work.
6.0
trustedreviews.com
✓ explicit
06/04/2017
Full review · Windows on ARM
Verdict
The HP Envy x2 is a thin, long-lasting 2-in-1 for people who mainly watch and browse on the move, but sluggish performance hinders real work.
6.0
pocket-lint.com
≈ estimated
05/12/2017
First look · Always-connected 2-in-1
Verdict
The HP Envy x2 is a well-made first Windows 2-in-1 on a phone chip, but its speed and real battery life remain unproven until tested longer.
7.6
cnet.com
✓ explicit
25/05/2018
Everyday use test · Snapdragon laptop
Verdict
The HP Envy x2 has excellent battery life and built-in LTE, but its slow Snapdragon processor makes it hard to recommend for everyday work.
5.0
zdnet.com
≈ estimated
11/06/2018
Everyday use · Windows on ARM
Verdict
The HP Envy x2 suits light users who value always-on connectivity, but slow Edge performance makes it a poor pick for heavy browsing.
4.0
01net.com
≈ estimated
23/06/2018
Hands-on test · Snapdragon 2-in-1
Verdict
The HP Envy x2 suits video watchers who want always-on 4G, but its sluggish performance and limited app support make it a weak choice for productive work.
6.5
computerhoy.20minutos.es
✓ explicit
25/08/2018
Hands-on review · Snapdragon 2-in-1
Verdict
The HP Envy x2 has an excellent screen and long battery life, but x86 emulation runs apps at roughly half the speed of native ARM software.
8.0
tomshw.it
≈ estimated
21/03/2018
Hands-on test · Always-connected PC
Verdict
The HP Envy x2 offers excellent battery life and 4G for people who want content without Wi-Fi, but some Windows apps don't run properly.

Third-party reviews

What customers like about HP Envy x2 4G (4GB + 64GB)

  • Exceptional battery life, often exceeding 19-20 hours in real-world testing.
  • Integrated 4G LTE connectivity for 'always-on' internet access without Wi-Fi.
  • High-quality 12.3-inch display with excellent brightness (up to 500 nits) and contrast.
  • Premium, ultra-thin (6.9mm) CNC-machined aluminium design that is lightweight and portable.
  • Fanless and silent operation with minimal heat buildup.
  • Includes essential accessories in the box, such as the keyboard cover and HP Digital Pen.
  • Impressive front-facing Bang & Olufsen stereo speakers for a tablet.

What customers don't like about HP Envy x2 4G (4GB + 64GB)

  • Underwhelming performance compared to Intel-based rivals, with noticeable lag in web browsing and multitasking.
  • Software compatibility issues; cannot run 64-bit (x64) apps and some 32-bit (x86) apps run slowly under emulation.
  • Limited connectivity with only a single USB-C port for both charging and peripherals.
  • Ships with Windows 10 S, which restricts users to Microsoft Store apps unless upgraded to Pro (which can further impact speed).
  • High initial price point that many reviewers felt was not justified by the processing power.
  • Poor 'lapability' due to the flexible folio keyboard design, making it difficult to use on uneven surfaces.
  • The included HP Digital Pen can experience input lag during fast sketching or writing.

Verdict

The HP Envy x2 4G is a sleek 12.3-inch detachable 2-in-1 tablet featuring a WUXGA+ IPS touchscreen with a 1920 x 1280 resolution. It is powered by the Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 processor and Adreno 540 graphics, paired with 4GB of LPDDR4x RAM and 64GB of eMMC storage. Its primary characteristics include integrated 4G LTE connectivity for always-on internet and a remarkably thin 6.9mm fanless aluminum design that ensures silent operation. The main pros of this device are its exceptional battery life of up to 22 hours and its highly portable, lightweight build weighing only 1.54 lbs. However, significant cons include underwhelming performance for demanding tasks due to the mobile-class processor, limited connectivity with only a single USB-C port, and potential software compatibility issues when running traditional Windows applications.

Compare HP Envy x2 4G (4GB + 64GB) with other tablets

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of HP Envy x2 4G (4GB + 64GB) and other tablets

No results found