OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS
Scored using Tablets Methodology v1.0
Tablets Methodology v1.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontum Tablets Methodology v1.0: technical specifications plus authentic consumer ratings, with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Tablets Methodology v1.0

Honor Pad X9a WiFi (4GB + 128GB) Review | 168 Data compared

Avg. price:~£130RAM capacity:6 GBInternal storage:128 GBScreen size:11.5 inchesChipset:Qualcomm Snapdragon 685

Honor Pad X9a WiFi (4GB + 128GB) Review: Compare 168 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Tablets category and whether it is worth buying.

7.6/10

Overall score

Score
7.6/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the smartphone's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best Tablets on the market.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 79% of models
Score components

90%

7.5

Technical score

10%

9.0

User score

â–²Better than 79% of tablets
8.3

Value for money

Value for money
8.3/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the smartphone's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a smartphone with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
★ Better than 91% of models
Score components

70%

7.6

Overall score

30%

9.8

Price

★Better than 91%
7.5

Technical score

Technical score
7.5/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of the smartphone's technical performance, covering eight key areas: performance & hardware, software, camera, connectivity, display, battery, audio, and design.
When it matters
When you want to compare Tablets based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 78% of models
Score components

22%

7.1

Performance

20%

7.4

Display

16%

7.4

Camera

14%

8.7

Battery

12%

6.8

Connectivity

8%

8.3

Software & Features

5%

7.2

Design

3%

7.0

Audio & Multimedia

â–²Better than 78%
9.0

User score

User score
9.0/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the smartphone
When it matters
When you want to know how a smartphone handles daily tasks and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 88% of models
Score components

70%

9.2

User ratings

30%

8.5

Number of reviews

â–²Better than 88%
  • No image
No image
Where to buy
    N/A~ £130
Best rankings
Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Available versions:
6GB + 128GBCheck price8GB + 256GBCheck price
Other versions:
4GB + 128GB8GB + 128GB
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of tablet Honor Pad X9a WiFi (4GB + 128GB)

Technical score
Technical score
7.5/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of the smartphone's technical performance, covering eight key areas: performance & hardware, software, camera, connectivity, display, battery, audio, and design.
When it matters
When you want to compare Tablets based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 78% of models
Score components:

22%

7.1

Performance

20%

7.4

Display

16%

7.4

Camera

14%

8.7

Battery

12%

6.8

Connectivity

8%

8.3

Software & Features

5%

7.2

Design

3%

7.0

Audio & Multimedia

7.5
User score
User score
9.0/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the smartphone
When it matters
When you want to know how a smartphone handles daily tasks and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 88% of models
Score components

70%

9.2

User ratings

30%

8.5

Number of reviews

9.0
Popularity
Popularity
8.5/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the smartphone.
When it matters
When you prefer to purchase a product chosen and reviewed by many other consumers.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 82% of models
Popularity:
Honor Pad X9a WiFi (4GB + 128GB) has a user popularity of 8.5 points, which is lower than 82.4% of Tablets.
8.5
Value for money
Value for money
8.3/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the smartphone's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a smartphone with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
★ Better than 91% of models
Score components:

70%

7.6

Overall score

30%

9.8

Price

8.3
RAM capacity
6 GB
Market range: <2 GB – >12 GB
This tablet has a RAM capacity of 6 GB which is larger than the RAM capacity of 65.3% of tablets and equal to that of 7% of tablets.
Process node
6 nm
Market range: <4 nm – >40 nm
This tablet is built on a 6 nm process node, which is smaller than the node size used in 76.4% of tablets and equal to the node used in 8.2% of tablets.
Internal storage
128 GB
Market range: <0 GB – >250 GB
This tablet has an internal storage capacity of 128 GB which is larger than the storage of 56.7% of tablets and equal to that of 19.6% of tablets.
Geekbench 6 single-core benchmark score
473 points
Market range: <233 points – >2.3k points
This tablet scored 473 points in Geekbench 6 (single-core) which is lower than the score of 59% of tablets and equal to the score of 0.6% of tablets.
Chipset
Qualcomm Snapdragon 685
This tablet uses the Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 chipset, which is more advanced than the chipsets in 60.5% of tablets and equal to those in 0.9% of tablets.
Show more
Screen resolution
2508×1504
This tablet has a screen resolution of 2508×1504 which is higher than that of 75% of tablets and equal to that of 0.2% of tablets.
Refresh rate
120 Hz
Market range: <60 Hz – >120 Hz
This tablet supports a refresh rate of 120 Hz which is higher than in 80.4% of tablets and equal to that in 10.8% of tablets.
Display type
IPS LCD
This tablet uses a IPS LCD display type. 17% of tablets use this display technology.
Pixel density
255 ppi
Market range: <149 ppi – >291 ppi
This tablet has a pixel density of 255 ppi which is higher than that of 69.8% of tablets and equal to that of 0.2% of tablets.
Display glass type
Chemically Strengthened Glass
This tablet uses Chemically Strengthened Glass display glass which is weaker than that on 65.1% of tablets and equal to that on 13% of tablets.
Show more
Optical image stabilization
no
This tablet does not support optical image stabilization. 0.4% of tablets include OIS.
Main camera megapixels
8 MP
Market range: <3.15 MP – >13 MP
This tablet has a main camera resolution of 8 MP which is higher than that of 36.5% of tablets and equal to that of 31.8% of tablets.
Front camera megapixels
5 MP
Market range: <1.2 MP – >9 MP
This tablet has a front camera resolution of 5 MP which is higher than in 48.8% of tablets and equal to that in 19.6% of tablets.
Main camera aperture
f/2.0
This tablet has a main camera aperture of f/2.0 which is wider than that of 57.5% of tablets and equal to that of 24.5% of tablets.
Optical zoom
1xxx
This tablet supports 1xx optical zoom which is higher than in 18.4% of tablets and equal to that in 80.7% of tablets.
Show more
Battery capacity
8,300 mAh
Market range: <4k mAh – >10.1k mAh
This tablet has a battery capacity of 8,300 mAh which is larger than the batteries in 76.9% of tablets and equal to those in 1.1% of tablets.
Charging speed
35 W
Market range: <10 W – >60 W
This tablet supports charging speeds of 35 W which is faster than in 77.7% of tablets and equal to speeds in 1.5% of tablets.
Battery life
22 hours
Market range: <6 hours – >16 hours
This tablet has a battery life of 22 hours, which is longer than that of 97.6% of tablets and equal to that of 0.4% of tablets.
video playback
Wireless charging
no
This tablet does not support wireless charging. 1.5% of tablets support wireless charging.
Fast charging
yes
This tablet supports fast charging. 50.4% of tablets support fast charging.
Show more
LTE support
yes
This tablet supports LTE. 36.8% of tablets include LTE connectivity.
Wi-Fi connectivity
yes
This tablet supports Wi-Fi connectivity. 0.2% of tablets offer Wi-Fi support.
GPS
no
This tablet does not support GPS. 82.7% of tablets include GPS functionality.
5G connectivity
no
This tablet does not support 5G connectivity. 11.1% of tablets support 5G.
NFC
no
This tablet does not support NFC. 10.9% of tablets support NFC.
Show more
Operating system
Android
This tablet uses the Android operating system, which is more advanced than the one used by 23.3%.
Update support duration
medium
This tablet offers medium update support, which is longer than the support period of 47.3% of tablets and equal to that of 32.6% of tablets.
Direct OS updates
no
This tablet does not receive direct OS updates. 79.7% of tablets receive direct updates.
On-device AI
yes
This tablet supports on-device AI. 71.8% of tablets support this capability.
App tracking protection
yes
This tablet includes app tracking protection. 71.8% of tablets include app tracking protection.
Show more
IP rating
not rated
This tablet has an IP rating of not rated which is lower than that of 16.3% of tablets and equal to that of 83.7% of tablets.
Weight
475 g
Market range: <315 g – >730 g
This tablet weighs 475 g which is lighter than 55.9% of tablets and equal to the weight of 0.9% of tablets.
Backlit keyboard
no
This tablet does not support a backlit keyboard. 9.8% of tablets support backlit keyboards.
Keyboard accessory
yes
This tablet supports a keyboard accessory. 15.8% of tablets support this option.
Pen latency
20 ms
Market range: <2 ms – >26 ms
This tablet has a pen latency of 20 ms, which is higher than that of 67.9% of tablets and equal to that of 8% of tablets.
Show more
Number of microphones
?
aptX Adaptive
no
This tablet does not support aptX Adaptive. 6.9% of tablets offer this codec.
Dolby Atmos support
no
This tablet does not support Dolby Atmos. 31.5% of tablets support Dolby Atmos.
N. of speakers
6
Market range: <1 – >6
This tablet includes 6 speakers, which is more than in 93.7% of tablets and equal to the number in 2.7% of tablets.
FM radio
no
This tablet does not include an FM radio. 19% of tablets offer FM radio functionality.
Show more

Honor Pad X9a WiFi (4GB + 128GB) vs the average tablet

246810TotalPerformanceDisplayCameraBatteryConnectivitySoftware & FeaturesDesignAudio & Multimedia
  • 2x higher refresh rate
    This tablet has a higher refresh rate than the average tablet (120 Hz vs 60 Hz). The average tablet has refresh rate of 60 Hz.
    120 Hz vs 60 Hz
  • 12 hours longer battery life
    This tablet offers longer battery life than the average tablet (22 hours vs 10 hours). The average tablet offers 10 hours of battery life.
    video playback
    22 hours vs 10 hours
  • More capable chipset
    This tablet uses the Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 chipset, while the average tablet uses MediaTek MT8169A.
    Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 vs MediaTek MT8169A
  • 40% higher CPU speed
    This tablet has a higher CPU speed than the average tablet (2.8 GHz vs 2 GHz). The average tablet has CPU speed of 2 GHz.
    2.8 GHz vs 2 GHz
  • Better GPU
    This tablet uses the Adreno 610 GPU, while the average tablet uses Mali-G51. GPU choice is one of the main performance differences between tablets.
    Adreno 610 vs Mali-G51
  • Supports adaptive refresh rate
    This tablet has adaptive refresh rate, the average tablet does not. 17.6% of tablets support adaptive refresh rate.
  • 4 more speakers
    This tablet has more speakers than the average tablet (6 vs 2). The average tablet has 2 speakers.
    6 vs 2
  • 1.4 inches larger screen size
    This tablet has a higher screen size than the average tablet (11.5 inches vs 10.1 inches). The average tablet has screen size of 10.1 inches.
    11.5 inches vs 10.1 inches
  • 12.2% higher user score
    User score
    9.0/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the smartphone
    When it matters
    When you want to know how a smartphone handles daily tasks and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
    Score distribution
    â–¼
    â–¼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    Honor Pad X9a WiFi
    the average tablet
    Honor Pad X9a WiFi (4GB + 128GB) has a higher user score than the average tablet (8.98 vs 8.000).
    8.98 vs 8
  • 16.9% better value for money
    Honor Pad X9a WiFi (4GB + 128GB) has better value for money than the average tablet (8.3 vs 7.1).
    8.3 vs 7.1
  • 2x cheaper
    Honor Pad X9a WiFi (4GB + 128GB) is cheaper than the average tablet (£130 vs £260).
    £130 vs £260
  • 76.4% more popular
    Honor Pad X9a WiFi (4GB + 128GB) is more popular than the average tablet (8.48 vs 4.8).
    8.48 vs 4.81
  • More capable chipset
    This tablet uses the Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 chipset, while the average tablet uses MediaTek MT8169A.
    Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 vs MediaTek MT8169A
  • 40% higher CPU speed
    This tablet has a higher CPU speed than the average tablet (2.8 GHz vs 2 GHz). The average tablet has CPU speed of 2 GHz.
    2.8 GHz vs 2 GHz
  • Better GPU
    This tablet uses the Adreno 610 GPU, while the average tablet uses Mali-G51. GPU choice is one of the main performance differences between tablets.
    Adreno 610 vs Mali-G51
  • 93.8% faster GPU clock
    This tablet has a higher GPU frequency than the average tablet (1,260 MHz vs 650 MHz). The average tablet has GPU frequency of 650 MHz.
    1,260 MHz vs 650 MHz
  • 57.1% smaller process node
    This tablet uses a smaller process node than the average tablet (6 nm vs 14 nm). The average tablet uses a process node of 14 nm.
    6 nm vs 14 nm
  • Newer DDR memory version
    This tablet supports a newer DDR version than the average tablet (LPDDR4X vs LPDDR3). The average DDR version is LPDDR3.
    LPDDR4X vs LPDDR3
  • 2x more storage
    This tablet has more internal storage than the average tablet (128 GB vs 64 GB). The average tablet provides 64 GB of internal storage.
    128 GB vs 64 GB
  • 2 GB more RAM
    This tablet has more RAM capacity than the average tablet (6 GB vs 4 GB). The average tablet has 4 GB of RAM.
    6 GB vs 4 GB
  • 2 more CPU threads
    This tablet has more CPU threads than the average tablet (8 vs 6). The average tablet has 6 CPU threads.
    8 vs 6
  • 2x higher refresh rate
    This tablet has a higher refresh rate than the average tablet (120 Hz vs 60 Hz). The average tablet has refresh rate of 60 Hz.
    120 Hz vs 60 Hz
  • Supports adaptive refresh rate
    This tablet has adaptive refresh rate, the average tablet does not. 17.6% of tablets support adaptive refresh rate.
  • 1.4 inches larger screen size
    This tablet has a higher screen size than the average tablet (11.5 inches vs 10.1 inches). The average tablet has screen size of 10.1 inches.
    11.5 inches vs 10.1 inches
  • Higher screen resolution
    This tablet has a higher screen resolution than the average tablet (2508×1504 vs 1920×1200). The average tablet resolution is 1920×1200.
    2508×1504 vs 1920×1200
  • Higher contrast ratio
    This tablet has a higher contrast ratio than the average tablet (1500:1 vs 1015:1). The average tablet contrast ratio is 1015:1.
    1,500:1 vs 1,015:1
  • 13.8% higher pixel density
    This tablet has a higher pixel density than the average tablet (255 ppi vs 224 ppi). The average tablet has pixel density of 224 ppi.
    255 ppi vs 224 ppi
  • 34 ppi higher screen sharpness
    This tablet has a higher screen sharpness than the average tablet (255 ppi vs 221 ppi). The average tablet has screen sharpness of 221 ppi.
    255 ppi vs 221 ppi
  • Allows manual focus
    This tablet allows manual focus control, the average tablet does not. 37.2% of tablets include manual focus.
  • Allows manual ISO
    This tablet allows manual ISO adjustment, the average tablet does not. 46% of tablets feature manual ISO.
  • Wider main camera aperture
    This tablet has a better main camera aperture than the average tablet (f/2 vs f/2.2). The average tablet uses f/2.2 main camera aperture.
    f/2.0 vs f/2.2
  • Supports slow-motion recording
    This tablet supports slow-motion recording, the average tablet does not. 37.5% of tablets offer slow-mo.
  • 12 hours longer battery life
    This tablet offers longer battery life than the average tablet (22 hours vs 10 hours). The average tablet offers 10 hours of battery life.
    video playback
    22 hours vs 10 hours
  • Supports fast charging
    This tablet supports fast charging, the average tablet does not. 49.7% of tablets feature fast charging.
  • 94.4% faster charging speed
    This tablet supports faster charging than the average tablet (35 W vs 18 W). The average tablet supports charging speed of 18 W.
    35 W vs 18 W
  • 26.1% larger battery capacity
    This tablet has a higher battery capacity than the average tablet (8,300 mAh vs 6,580 mAh). The average tablet battery has capacity of 6,580 mAh.
    8,300 mAh vs 6,580 mAh
  • Includes battery health monitoring
    This tablet features battery health monitoring, the average tablet does not. 37% of tablets include battery health tools.
  • Newer Bluetooth version
    This tablet supports a newer Bluetooth version than the average tablet (5.1 vs 5). The average tablet uses Bluetooth 5.0.
    5.1 vs 5.0
  • Includes on-device AI
    This tablet includes on-device AI, the average tablet does not. 28.3% of tablets include on-device AI.
  • Supports live text recognition
    This tablet supports live text recognition, the average tablet does not. 34.9% of tablets can recognize text from images.
  • Includes app tracking protection
    This tablet includes app tracking protection, the average tablet does not. 28.3% of tablets offer app tracking protection.
  • Allows app offloading
    This tablet allows app offloading, the average tablet does not. 26.4% of tablets support app offloading.
  • Includes clipboard warnings
    This tablet has clipboard warnings, the average tablet does not. 39.9% of tablets include clipboard warnings.
  • Suitable for drawing
    This tablet is suitable for drawing, the average tablet is not. 41% of tablets are suitable for drawing.
  • Supports stylus tilt
    This tablet supports stylus tilt, the average tablet does not. 33.6% of tablets support stylus tilt.
  • 1.23 mm thinner
    This tablet is thinner than the average tablet (6.8 mm vs 8 mm). The average tablet is 8.0 mm thick.
    6.77 mm vs 8.0 mm
  • 6 newer release date
    This tablet has a newer release date than the average tablet (2025 vs 2019).
    March 2025
    2025 vs 2019
  • Designed for kids
    This tablet is suitable for kids, the average tablet is not. 23.7% of tablets are suitable for kids.
  • 4 more speakers
    This tablet has more speakers than the average tablet (6 vs 2). The average tablet has 2 speakers.
    6 vs 2
  • Supports LDAC
    This tablet supports LDAC, the average tablet does not. 25.2% of tablets support LDAC.
  • Supports Bluetooth LE Audio
    This tablet supports Bluetooth LE Audio, the average tablet does not. 11.5% of tablets support Bluetooth LE Audio.
  • Does not receive direct OS updates
    This tablet does not support direct OS updates, the average tablet does. 79.7% of tablets support direct OS updates.
  • No continuous video AF
    This tablet does not support continuous video AF, the average tablet does. 57.7% of tablets support continuous video autofocus.
  • No GPS
    This tablet does not have GPS, the average tablet does. 82.7% of tablets feature GPS.
  • No cellular module
    This tablet does not have a cellular module, the average tablet does. 59.3% of tablets include a cellular module.
  • Less durable display glass
    This tablet uses weaker display glass than the average tablet (Chemically Strengthened Glass vs Corning Gorilla Glass). Display glass choice still varies across tablets.
    Chemically Strengthened Glass vs Corning Gorilla Glass
  • No 3.5 mm headphone jack
    This tablet does not have a 3.5 mm headphone jack, the average tablet does. 72.9% of tablets include a headphone jack.
  • No HDMI output
    This tablet does not have an HDMI output, the average tablet does. 50.1% of tablets support HDMI output.
  • 11 ms higher pen latency
    This tablet has higher pen latency than the average tablet (20 ms vs 9 ms). The average tablet has pen latency of 9 ms.
    20 ms vs 9 ms
  • 35.1% lower Geekbench 6 single-core benchmark score
    This tablet achieves a lower Geekbench 6 single-core benchmark score than the average tablet (473 points vs 729 points). The average tablet scores 729 points in Geekbench 6 single-core.
    473 points vs 729 points
  • 21.5% lower Geekbench 6 multi-core benchmark score
    This tablet achieves a lower Geekbench 6 multi-core benchmark score than the average tablet (1,484 points vs 1,891 points). The average tablet scores 1,891 points in Geekbench 6 multi-core.
    1,484 points vs 1,891 points
  • Less durable display glass
    This tablet uses weaker display glass than the average tablet (Chemically Strengthened Glass vs Corning Gorilla Glass). Display glass choice still varies across tablets.
    Chemically Strengthened Glass vs Corning Gorilla Glass
  • 1 nits lower peak brightness
    This tablet has a lower peak brightness than the average tablet (400 nits vs 401 nits). The average tablet reaches 401 nits peak brightness.
    400 nits vs 401 nits
  • No continuous video AF
    This tablet does not support continuous video AF, the average tablet does. 57.7% of tablets support continuous video autofocus.
  • No GPS
    This tablet does not have GPS, the average tablet does. 82.7% of tablets feature GPS.
  • No cellular module
    This tablet does not have a cellular module, the average tablet does. 59.3% of tablets include a cellular module.
  • No HDMI output
    This tablet does not have an HDMI output, the average tablet does. 50.1% of tablets support HDMI output.
  • Does not receive direct OS updates
    This tablet does not support direct OS updates, the average tablet does. 79.7% of tablets support direct OS updates.
  • 11 ms higher pen latency
    This tablet has higher pen latency than the average tablet (20 ms vs 9 ms). The average tablet has pen latency of 9 ms.
    20 ms vs 9 ms
  • No 3.5 mm headphone jack
    This tablet does not have a 3.5 mm headphone jack, the average tablet does. 72.9% of tablets include a headphone jack.

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

9.0
TechToko
≈ estimated
05/12/2025
Hands-on review · real-world use and battery test
Verdict
Honor Pad X9a WiFi is one of the best balanced budget tablets tested this year and a strong pick for everyday use.
8.0
YugaGaming
≈ estimated
22/09/2025
Gaming test · 30-minute runs in five games
Verdict
Honor Pad X9a WiFi handles casual and mid-range games well, but struggles with demanding titles like Genshin Impact.
7.0
Firdavsi Game Dev
≈ estimated
03/09/2025
Hands-on review · gaming, note-taking and teaching tests
Verdict
Honor Pad X9a WiFi suits casual gaming and studying, but it is not built for professional gaming.
8.0
YugaTech
≈ estimated
23/05/2025
Full review · display, performance and battery tests
Verdict
Honor Pad X9a WiFi is a solid, balanced tablet for everyday tasks, though it struggles with demanding games.
9.0
Now & Then Tech
≈ estimated
26/04/2025
Hands-on review · kids mode, AI features and gaming tests
Verdict
Honor Pad X9a WiFi is simple to use with plenty of uses, and an easy recommendation unless you are a power user.
Shop video
Not graded
Not graded
Not graded yet
Not graded yet

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

E
en.techreviewer.de
02/07/2024
Summary of the review
HONOR Pad X9a review: HONOR ups the ante with its budget tablet
S
smartzone.de
20/07/2025
Summary of the review
Honor Pad X9a Tablet im Test – Ehre, wem Ehre gebührt!
(Translated)Show original
T
techreviewer.de
21/07/2025
Summary of the review
HONOR Pad X9a im Test: HONOR legt beim Budget-Tablet nach
(Translated)Show original
F
fr.techreviewer.de
21/07/2025
Summary of the review
Test du HONOR Pad X9a: HONOR place la barre plus haut avec sa nouvelle tablette d'entrée de gamme
(Translated)Show original
R
racunalniske-novice.com
23/03/2025
Summary of the review
Cerchi un ottimo tablet? Ecco l'Honor Pad X9a
(Translated)Show original
N
nl.techreviewer.de
21/07/2025
Summary of the review
HONOR Pad X9a review: HONOR verhoogt de inzet met zijn budgettablet
(Translated)Show original
T
test-aankoop.be
01/06/2025
Summary of the review
HONOR PAD X9A test en review - Testaankoop
(Translated)Show original

Third-party reviews

What customers like about Honor Pad X9a WiFi (4GB + 128GB)

  • Vibrant 11.5-inch 2.5K display with a smooth 120Hz refresh rate
  • Excellent value for money, often cited as a top choice in its price range
  • Premium build quality with a slim, lightweight metal unibody design
  • Long-lasting 8300mAh battery providing solid all-day usage
  • Immersive audio from the quad-speaker setup with clear vocals
  • Widevine L1 support for Full HD streaming on Netflix and Disney+
  • Smooth performance for everyday tasks like web browsing and light multitasking

What customers don't like about Honor Pad X9a WiFi (4GB + 128GB)

  • No 3.5mm headphone jack or microSD card slot for storage expansion
  • Display brightness is insufficient for comfortable use in direct sunlight
  • Cameras provide only average quality, especially in low-light conditions
  • Struggles with demanding 3D games, resulting in frame drops or stuttering
  • Charging speeds are relatively slow, taking around two hours for a full charge
  • Software support lifecycle is shorter than competitors, typically limited to 2-3 years
  • No official IP rating for dust or water resistance

Verdict

The Honor Pad X9a WiFi (4GB + 128GB) is a sleek 11.5-inch tablet featuring a 2.5K FullView LCD with a smooth 120Hz refresh rate and 400 nits peak brightness. Powered by an octa-core Snapdragon 685 chipset, it offers a refined multimedia experience with its six-speaker surround system and a large 8,300mAh battery supporting 35W fast charging. Main pros include its premium ultra-slim 6.77mm metal unibody design, long-lasting battery life of up to 22 hours of use, and a vibrant display suitable for streaming. Notable cons include the lack of a 3.5mm headphone jack, no microSD card slot for storage expansion, and performance that may struggle with graphically demanding games.

Compare Honor Pad X9a WiFi (4GB + 128GB) with other tablets

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Honor Pad X9a WiFi (4GB + 128GB) and other tablets

No results found