Scored using Tablets Methodology v1.0
Tablets Methodology v1.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontum Tablets Methodology v1.0: technical specifications plus authentic consumer ratings, with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Tablets Methodology v1.0

Dell Latitude 7212 4G (16GB + 256GB) Review | 168 Data compared

Avg. price:~£2,060RAM capacity:16 GBInternal storage:256 GBScreen size:11.6 inchesChipset:Intel Core i5-7300U

Dell Latitude 7212 4G (16GB + 256GB) Review: Compare 168 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Tablets category and whether it is worth buying.

7.1/10

Overall score

Score
7.1/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the smartphone's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best Tablets on the market.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

90%

7.1

Technical score

10%

7.1

User score

â–²Better than 70% of tablets
5.3

Value for money

Value for money
5.3/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the smartphone's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a smartphone with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

7.1

Overall score

30%

1.0

Price

â–¼Worse than 99%
7.1

Technical score

Technical score
7.1/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of the smartphone's technical performance, covering eight key areas: performance & hardware, software, camera, connectivity, display, battery, audio, and design.
When it matters
When you want to compare Tablets based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

22%

7.8

Performance

20%

6.1

Display

16%

6.4

Camera

14%

7.0

Battery

12%

8.4

Connectivity

8%

8.5

Software & Features

5%

6.0

Design

3%

5.7

Audio & Multimedia

â–²Better than 71%
7.1

User score

User score
7.1/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the smartphone
When it matters
When you want to know how a smartphone handles daily tasks and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

8.5

User ratings

30%

4.0

Number of reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
â–¼Worse than 83%
  • No image
No image
Where to buy
    N/A~ £2,060
Best rankings
Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Available versions:
Loading...
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of tablet Dell Latitude 7212 4G (16GB + 256GB)

Technical score
Technical score
7.1/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of the smartphone's technical performance, covering eight key areas: performance & hardware, software, camera, connectivity, display, battery, audio, and design.
When it matters
When you want to compare Tablets based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

22%

7.8

Performance

20%

6.1

Display

16%

6.4

Camera

14%

7.0

Battery

12%

8.4

Connectivity

8%

8.5

Software & Features

5%

6.0

Design

3%

5.7

Audio & Multimedia

7.1
User score
User score
7.1/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the smartphone
When it matters
When you want to know how a smartphone handles daily tasks and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

8.5

User ratings

30%

4.0

Number of reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
7.1
Popularity
Popularity
4.0/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the smartphone.
When it matters
When you prefer to purchase a product chosen and reviewed by many other consumers.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Popularity:
Dell Latitude 7212 4G (16GB + 256GB) has a popularity of 4 points, which is higher than 55.1% of Tablets.
4.0
Value for money
Value for money
5.3/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the smartphone's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a smartphone with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

70%

7.1

Overall score

30%

1.0

Price

5.3
RAM capacity
16 GB
This tablet has a RAM capacity of 16 GB which is larger than the RAM capacity of 96.2% of tablets and equal to that of 3.6% of tablets.
Process node
14 nm
This tablet is built on a 14 nm process node, which is smaller than the node size used in 45% of tablets and equal to the node used in 8.6% of tablets.
Internal storage
256 GB
This tablet has an internal storage capacity of 256 GB which is larger than the storage of 76.5% of tablets and equal to that of 15.7% of tablets.
Geekbench 6 single-core benchmark score
1,278 points
This tablet scored 1,278 points in Geekbench 6 (single-core) which is higher than the score of 70.4% of tablets and equal to the score of 0.3% of tablets.
Chipset
Intel Core i5-7300U
This tablet uses the Intel Core i5-7300U chipset, which is more advanced than the chipsets in 75% of tablets and equal to those in 0.7% of tablets.
Show more
Screen resolution
1920×1080
This tablet has a screen resolution of 1920×1080 which is lower than that of 61% of tablets and equal to that of 2.7% of tablets.
Refresh rate
60 Hz
This tablet supports a refresh rate of 60 Hz which is equal to that in 73.8% of tablets.
Display type
IPS LCD
This tablet uses a IPS LCD display type. 17% of tablets use this display technology.
Pixel density
190 ppi
This tablet has a pixel density of 190 ppi which is lower than that of 65.1% of tablets and equal to that of 1.4% of tablets.
Display glass type
Corning Gorilla Glass
This tablet uses Corning Gorilla Glass display glass which is stronger than that on 45.4% of tablets and equal to that on 32.7% of tablets.
Show more
Optical image stabilization
no
This tablet does not support optical image stabilization. 0.4% of tablets include OIS.
Main camera megapixels
8 MP
This tablet has a main camera resolution of 8 MP which is higher than that of 36.5% of tablets and equal to that of 31.8% of tablets.
Front camera megapixels
5 MP
This tablet has a front camera resolution of 5 MP which is higher than in 48.8% of tablets and equal to that in 19.6% of tablets.
Main camera aperture
?
Optical zoom
N/A
Show more
Battery capacity
4,342 mAh
This tablet has a battery capacity of 4,342 mAh which is smaller than the batteries in 80.4% of tablets and equal to those in 0.4% of tablets.
Charging speed
65 W
This tablet supports charging speeds of 65 W which is faster than in 91.5% of tablets and equal to speeds in 1.7% of tablets.
Battery life
11.5 hours
This tablet has a battery life of 11.5 hours, which is longer than that of 64.7% of tablets and equal to that of 0.8% of tablets.
Wireless charging
no
This tablet does not support wireless charging. 1.5% of tablets support wireless charging.
Fast charging
yes
This tablet supports fast charging. 50.4% of tablets support fast charging.
Show more
LTE support
yes
This tablet supports LTE. 36.8% of tablets include LTE connectivity.
Wi-Fi connectivity
yes
This tablet supports Wi-Fi connectivity. 0.2% of tablets offer Wi-Fi support.
GPS
yes
This tablet supports GPS. 17.3% of tablets include GPS functionality.
5G connectivity
no
This tablet does not support 5G connectivity. 11.1% of tablets support 5G.
NFC
yes
This tablet supports NFC. 89.1% of tablets support NFC.
Show more
Operating system
Windows
This tablet uses the Windows operating system, which is less advanced than the one used by 84.1%.
Update support duration
long
This tablet offers long update support, which is longer than the support period of 80% of tablets and equal to that of 20% of tablets.
Direct OS updates
yes
This tablet receives direct OS updates. 20.3% of tablets receive direct updates.
On-device AI
no
This tablet does not support on-device AI. 28.3% of tablets support this capability.
App tracking protection
no
This tablet does not include app tracking protection. 28.3% of tablets include app tracking protection.
Show more
IP rating
IP65
This tablet has an IP rating of IP65 which is higher than that of 93.5% of tablets and equal to that of 1.1% of tablets.
Weight
1,270 g
This tablet weighs 1,270 g which is heavier than 99.1% of tablets and equal to the weight of 0.4% of tablets.
Backlit keyboard
yes
This tablet supports a backlit keyboard. 90.3% of tablets support backlit keyboards.
Keyboard accessory
yes
This tablet supports a keyboard accessory. 15.8% of tablets support this option.
Pen latency
N/A
Show more
Number of microphones
2
This tablet includes 2 microphones, which is more than in 55.1% of tablets and equal to the number in 32.7% of tablets.
aptX Adaptive
no
This tablet does not support aptX Adaptive. 6.9% of tablets offer this codec.
Dolby Atmos support
no
This tablet does not support Dolby Atmos. 31.5% of tablets support Dolby Atmos.
N. of speakers
2
This tablet includes 2 speakers, which is more than in 9.8% of tablets and equal to the number in 60.9% of tablets.
FM radio
no
This tablet does not include an FM radio. 19% of tablets offer FM radio functionality.
Show more

Dell Latitude 7212 4G (16GB + 256GB) vs the average tablet

246810TotalPerformanceDisplayCameraBatteryConnectivitySoftware & FeaturesDesignAudio & Multimedia
  • Faster storage type
    This tablet uses NVMe storage, while the average tablet uses eMMC. Storage technology still varies widely across tablets.
    NVMe vs eMMC
  • 2.1x higher CPU speed
    This tablet has a higher CPU speed than the average tablet (4.2 GHz vs 2 GHz). The average tablet has CPU speed of 2 GHz.
    4.2 GHz vs 2 GHz
  • More capable chipset
    This tablet uses the Intel Core i5-7300U chipset, while the average tablet uses MediaTek MT8169A.
    Intel Core i5-7300U vs MediaTek MT8169A
  • 12 GB more RAM
    This tablet has more RAM capacity than the average tablet (16 GB vs 4 GB). The average tablet has 4 GB of RAM.
    16 GB vs 4 GB
  • 4x more storage
    This tablet has more internal storage than the average tablet (256 GB vs 64 GB). The average tablet provides 64 GB of internal storage.
    256 GB vs 64 GB
  • 3.61x faster charging speed
    This tablet supports faster charging than the average tablet (65 W vs 18 W). The average tablet supports charging speed of 18 W.
    65 W vs 18 W
  • Supports Thunderbolt
    This tablet supports Thunderbolt, the average tablet does not. 2.3% of tablets support Thunderbolt.
  • Higher IP rating
    This tablet has a better IP rating than the average tablet (IP65 vs not rated). Water and dust protection are still uncommon on tablets.
    IP65 vs not rated
  • Faster storage type
    This tablet uses NVMe storage, while the average tablet uses eMMC. Storage technology still varies widely across tablets.
    NVMe vs eMMC
  • 2.1x higher CPU speed
    This tablet has a higher CPU speed than the average tablet (4.2 GHz vs 2 GHz). The average tablet has CPU speed of 2 GHz.
    4.2 GHz vs 2 GHz
  • More capable chipset
    This tablet uses the Intel Core i5-7300U chipset, while the average tablet uses MediaTek MT8169A.
    Intel Core i5-7300U vs MediaTek MT8169A
  • 12 GB more RAM
    This tablet has more RAM capacity than the average tablet (16 GB vs 4 GB). The average tablet has 4 GB of RAM.
    16 GB vs 4 GB
  • 4x more storage
    This tablet has more internal storage than the average tablet (256 GB vs 64 GB). The average tablet provides 64 GB of internal storage.
    256 GB vs 64 GB
  • Supports multithreading
    This tablet supports multithreading, the average tablet does not. 0.00% of tablets support multithreading.
  • 75.3% higher Geekbench 6 single-core benchmark score
    This tablet achieves a higher Geekbench 6 single-core benchmark score than the average tablet (1,278 points vs 729 points). The average tablet scores 729 points in Geekbench 6 single-core.
    1,278 points vs 729 points
  • 20 more GPU execution units
    This tablet has more GPU execution units than the average tablet (24 vs 4). The average tablet has 4 GPU execution units.
    24 vs 4
  • 2x higher memory bandwidth
    This tablet has a higher memory bandwidth than the average tablet (29.8 GB/s vs 14.9 GB/s). The average tablet has memory bandwidth of 14.9 GB/s.
    29.8 GB/s vs 14.9 GB/s
  • 23.1% higher Geekbench 6 multi-core benchmark score
    This tablet achieves a higher Geekbench 6 multi-core benchmark score than the average tablet (2,327 points vs 1,891 points). The average tablet scores 1,891 points in Geekbench 6 multi-core.
    2,327 points vs 1,891 points
  • 1.5 inches larger screen size
    This tablet has a higher screen size than the average tablet (11.6 inches vs 10.1 inches). The average tablet has screen size of 10.1 inches.
    11.6 inches vs 10.1 inches
  • 124 nits higher peak brightness
    This tablet has a higher peak brightness than the average tablet (525 nits vs 401 nits). The average tablet reaches 401 nits peak brightness.
    525 nits vs 401 nits
  • Includes anti-reflection coating
    This tablet has anti-reflection coating, the average tablet does not. 24.7% of tablets use anti-reflection coating.
  • Includes flash
    This tablet features a built-in flash, the average tablet does not. 45.2% of tablets include a flash.
  • 3.61x faster charging speed
    This tablet supports faster charging than the average tablet (65 W vs 18 W). The average tablet supports charging speed of 18 W.
    65 W vs 18 W
  • Supports fast charging
    This tablet supports fast charging, the average tablet does not. 49.7% of tablets feature fast charging.
  • Includes battery health monitoring
    This tablet features battery health monitoring, the average tablet does not. 37% of tablets include battery health tools.
  • 1.5 hours longer battery life
    This tablet offers longer battery life than the average tablet (11.5 hours vs 10 hours). The average tablet offers 10 hours of battery life.
    11.5 hours vs 10 hours
  • Supports Thunderbolt
    This tablet supports Thunderbolt, the average tablet does not. 2.3% of tablets support Thunderbolt.
  • Supports DisplayPort over USB-C
    This tablet supports DisplayPort over USB-C, the average tablet does not. 21.5% of tablets support DisplayPort over USB-C.
  • Supports NFC
    This tablet has NFC support, the average tablet does not. 10.9% of tablets include NFC.
  • Newer USB version
    This tablet supports a newer USB version than the average tablet (USB 3.2 Gen 1 vs USB 2). The average tablet uses USB USB 2.0.
    USB 3.2 Gen 1 vs USB 2.0
  • Longer update support
    This tablet offers longer update support than the average tablet (long vs medium). The average tablet gets medium of update support.
    long vs medium
  • Supports live text recognition
    This tablet supports live text recognition, the average tablet does not. 34.9% of tablets can recognize text from images.
  • Higher IP rating
    This tablet has a better IP rating than the average tablet (IP65 vs not rated). Water and dust protection are still uncommon on tablets.
    IP65 vs not rated
  • Includes stylus
    This tablet includes a stylus, the average tablet does not. 16.9% of tablets come with a stylus.
  • Includes backlit keyboard
    This tablet has a backlit keyboard, the average tablet does not. 9.8% of tablets offer a backlit keyboard.
  • Supports stylus tilt
    This tablet supports stylus tilt, the average tablet does not. 33.6% of tablets support stylus tilt.
  • 1 more microphone/s
    This tablet has more microphones than the average tablet (2 vs 1). The average tablet has 1 microphones.
    2 vs 1
  • Less advanced operating system
    This tablet runs on a less advanced operating system than the average tablet (Windows vs Android). Operating system choice shapes app support, updates, and ecosystem features.
    Windows vs Android
  • No continuous video AF
    This tablet does not support continuous video AF, the average tablet does. 57.7% of tablets support continuous video autofocus.
  • 2.59x heavier
    This tablet is heavier than the average tablet (1,270 g vs 490 g). The average tablet weighs 490 g.
    1,270 g vs 490 g
  • 34% smaller battery capacity
    This tablet has a lower battery capacity than the average tablet (4,342 mAh vs 6,580 mAh). The average tablet battery has capacity of 6,580 mAh.
    4,342 mAh vs 6,580 mAh
  • No manual white balance
    This tablet does not allow manual white balance adjustments, the average tablet does. 51.6% of tablets include white balance controls.
  • 16.38 mm thicker
    This tablet is thicker than the average tablet (24.4 mm vs 8 mm). The average tablet is 8.0 mm thick.
    24.38 mm vs 8.0 mm
  • No burst mode
    This tablet does not support burst mode, the average tablet does. 60.5% of tablets support burst mode.
  • 2 fewer CPU threads
    This tablet has less CPU threads than the average tablet (4 vs 6). The average tablet has 6 CPU threads.
    4 vs 6
  • 7.92x more expensive
    Dell Latitude 7212 4G (16GB + 256GB) is more expensive than the average tablet (£2,060 vs £260).
    £2,060 vs £260
  • 34.6% worse value for money
    Dell Latitude 7212 4G (16GB + 256GB) has worse value for money than the average tablet (5.27 vs 7.1).
    5.27 vs 7.1
  • 12.2% lower user score
    User score
    7.1/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the smartphone
    When it matters
    When you want to know how a smartphone handles daily tasks and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
    Score distribution
    ▼▼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    Dell Latitude 7212 4G
    the average tablet
    Dell Latitude 7212 4G (16GB + 256GB) has a lower user score than the average tablet (7.13 vs 8.000).
    7.13 vs 8
  • 2 fewer CPU threads
    This tablet has less CPU threads than the average tablet (4 vs 6). The average tablet has 6 CPU threads.
    4 vs 6
  • No big.LITTLE architecture
    This tablet does not use a big.LITTLE architecture, the average tablet does. 51.3% of tablets use a big.LITTLE architecture.
  • 15.2% lower pixel density
    This tablet has a lower pixel density than the average tablet (190 ppi vs 224 ppi). The average tablet has pixel density of 224 ppi.
    190 ppi vs 224 ppi
  • Lower screen resolution
    This tablet has a lower screen resolution than the average tablet (1920×1080 vs 1920×1200). The average tablet has a resolution of 1920×1200.
    1920×1080 vs 1920×1200
  • 31 ppi lower screen sharpness
    This tablet has a lower screen sharpness than the average tablet (190 ppi vs 221 ppi). The average tablet has screen sharpness of 221 ppi.
    190 ppi vs 221 ppi
  • No continuous video AF
    This tablet does not support continuous video AF, the average tablet does. 57.7% of tablets support continuous video autofocus.
  • No manual white balance
    This tablet does not allow manual white balance adjustments, the average tablet does. 51.6% of tablets include white balance controls.
  • No burst mode
    This tablet does not support burst mode, the average tablet does. 60.5% of tablets support burst mode.
  • No BSI sensor
    This tablet lacks a BSI sensor, the average tablet has one. 52.6% of tablets use BSI sensors for better low-light shots.
  • No timelapse video
    This tablet does not support timelapse video, the average tablet does. 57.5% of tablets include timelapse modes.
  • 34% smaller battery capacity
    This tablet has a lower battery capacity than the average tablet (4,342 mAh vs 6,580 mAh). The average tablet battery has capacity of 6,580 mAh.
    4,342 mAh vs 6,580 mAh
  • No face recognition
    This tablet does not have face recognition, the average tablet does. 56% of tablets support face recognition.
  • Older Bluetooth version
    This tablet uses an older Bluetooth version than the average tablet (4.2 vs 5). The average tablet uses Bluetooth 5.0.
    4.2 vs 5.0
  • Less advanced operating system
    This tablet runs on a less advanced operating system than the average tablet (Windows vs Android). Operating system choice shapes app support, updates, and ecosystem features.
    Windows vs Android
  • No full-page screenshots
    This tablet does not support full-page screenshots, the average tablet does. 52.5% of tablets support full-page screenshots.
  • 2.59x heavier
    This tablet is heavier than the average tablet (1,270 g vs 490 g). The average tablet weighs 490 g.
    1,270 g vs 490 g
  • 16.38 mm thicker
    This tablet is thicker than the average tablet (24.4 mm vs 8 mm). The average tablet is 8.0 mm thick.
    24.38 mm vs 8.0 mm
  • 137.12 mm wider
    This tablet is wider than the average tablet (312.4 mm vs 175.3 mm). The average tablet is 175.3 mm wide.
    312.42 mm vs 175.3 mm

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

Not graded yet
Not graded yet
Not graded yet
Not graded yet
Not graded yet
Not graded yet
Not graded yet
Not graded yet
Not graded yet
Not graded yet

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

laptopmag.com
28/12/2017
Full review · Rugged tablet
Verdict
The Dell Latitude 7212 is a tough tablet that survives 4-foot drops and lasts all day on two batteries, though its fuzzy screen and high price hold it back.
P
pcmag.com
30/01/2018
Summary of the review
techaeris.com
11/03/2018
Hands-on review · Rugged tablet
Verdict
The Dell Latitude 7212 is a rugged work tablet that came through a hardwood-floor fall unharmed, but its slow trackpad and tinny sound are weak points.
windowscentral.com
12/08/2020
Review · Rugged tablet
Verdict
The Dell Latitude 7212 is a rugged tablet with Ultrabook-class speed and swappable batteries, but its exhaust fan blows hot air at your palm in summer.
ruggedpcreview.com
Late 2018
Long-term review · Rugged Windows tablet
Verdict
The Dell Latitude 7212 is a rugged Windows tablet that doubles as a laptop with its snap-on keyboard, but it is thick and heavy next to an iPad.
U
uk.pcmag.com
30/01/2018
Summary of the review
au.pcmag.com
31/01/2018
Lab test · Rugged tablet
Verdict
The Dell Latitude 7212 is a bright, tough detachable that suits field workers, though its touchpad becomes unusable in rain.
au.pcmag.com
13/06/2018
Hands-on review · Rugged detachable
Verdict
The Dell Latitude 7212 is a tough, well-designed detachable Windows tablet that's a relative bargain next to rugged rivals.
L
laptopmedia.com
15/07/2021
Summary of the review
R
refurbed.nl
18/03/2026
Summary of the review
D
dubbelgaaf.nl
18/03/2026
Summary of the review

Third-party reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
Reviews last updated: November 2026 · How we calculate this

What customers like about Dell Latitude 7212 4G (16GB + 256GB)

  • Extreme durability with MIL-STD-810G and IP65 ratings for protection against drops, water, and dust.
  • Exceptional display brightness (over 500 nits) making it easily readable in direct sunlight.
  • Dual hot-swappable battery system allows for continuous operation without powering down.
  • Glove-capable touchscreen and included tethered stylus for use in harsh weather or industrial settings.
  • Extensive accessory ecosystem including vehicle docks, keyboard covers, and various carrying straps.
  • Integrated physical privacy shutters for both front and rear cameras.

What customers don't like about Dell Latitude 7212 4G (16GB + 256GB)

  • The touchpad on the optional keyboard cover is often described as unresponsive or finicky, especially in wet conditions.
  • Significant bulk and weight (starting at ~2.8 lbs) compared to standard consumer tablets like the iPad Pro.
  • Essential accessories like the keyboard cover and kickstand are expensive add-ons rather than included.
  • The display's protective etched glass can create a slightly 'fuzzy' or grainy visual texture.
  • Audio quality from the speakers is noted as tinny and lacking bass.
  • Performance is adequate for field tasks but lags behind similarly priced non-rugged workstations.

Verdict

The Dell Latitude 7212 Rugged Extreme is a highly durable 11.6-inch tablet featuring an outdoor-readable Full HD (1920 x 1080) touch screen with 800-nit brightness and Gorilla Glass protection. This specific configuration is powered by 16GB of LPDDR3 RAM and a 256GB SSD, and it includes 4G LTE connectivity for field use. Built to MIL-STD-810G and IP65 standards, it is resistant to drops, dust, and water. Main pros include its dual hot-swappable battery system for extended runtime and its exceptional sunlight-readable display. However, common cons include a janky or unresponsive touchpad (especially when wet), tinny integrated speakers, and substantial bulk compared to standard consumer tablets.

Compare Dell Latitude 7212 4G (16GB + 256GB) with other tablets

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Dell Latitude 7212 4G (16GB + 256GB) and other tablets

No results found